Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Research Articles

The matricellular protein CCN5 prevents anti-VEGF drug-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of retinal pigment epithelium

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the major causes of blindness in the elderly worldwide. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs have been widely used to treat the neovascular type of AMD (nAMD). However, VEGF acts not only as a pro-angiogenic factor but also as an anti-apoptotic factor in the eyes. In this study, we found that anti-VEGF drugs, including bevacizumab (Bev), ranibizumab (Ran), and aflibercept (Afl), induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in ARPE-19 cells in vitro, accompanied by the induction of CCN2, a potent pro-fibrotic factor. Similarly, intravitreal injection of Afl into mouse eyes resulted in EMT in the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE). Co-treatment with CCN5, an anti-fibrotic factor that down-regulates CCN2 expression, significantly attenuated the adverse effects of the anti-VEGF drugs both in vitro and in vivo. Inhibition of the VEGF signaling pathway with antagonists of VEGF receptors, SU5416 and ZM323881, induced EMT and up-regulated CCN2 in ARPE-19 cells. Additionally, knock-down of CCN2 with siRNA abolished the adverse effects of the anti-VEGF drugs in ARPE-19 cells. Collectively, these results suggest that anti-VEGF drugs induce EMT in RPE through the induction of CCN2 and that co-treatment with CCN5 attenuates the adverse effects of anti-VEGF drugs in mouse eyes.

Anti-angiogenic and antioxidant effects of axitinib in human retinal endothelial cells: implications in diabetic retinopathy.

Diabetic retinopathy is a secondary microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus. This disease progresses from two stages, non-proliferative and proliferative diabetic retinopathy, the latter characterized by retinal abnormal angiogenesis. Pharmacological management of retinal angiogenesis employs expensive and invasive intravitreal injections of biologic drugs (anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents). To search small molecules able to act as anti-angiogenic agents, we focused our study on axitinib, which is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and represents the second line treatment for renal cell carcinoma. Axitinib is an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and among the others tyrosine kinase inhibitors (sunitinib and sorafenib) is the most selective towards vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 and 2. Besides the well-known anti-angiogenic and immune-modulatory functions, we hereby explored the polypharmacological profile of axitinib, through a bioinformatic/molecular modeling approach and in vitro models of diabetic retinopathy. We showed the anti-angiogenic activity of axitinib in two different in vitro models of diabetic retinopathy, by challenging retinal endothelial cells with high glucose concentration (fluctuating and non-fluctuating). We found that axitinib, along with inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1 (1.82 ± 0.10; 0.54 ± 0.13, phosphorylated protein levels in fluctuating high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 2 (2.38 ± 0.21; 0.98 ± 0.20, phosphorylated protein levels in fluctuating high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively), was able to significantly reduce (p < 0.05) the expression of Nrf2 (1.43 ± 0.04; 0.85 ± 0.01, protein levels in fluctuating high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively) in retinal endothelial cells exposed to high glucose, through predicted Keap1 interaction and activation of melanocortin receptor 1. Furthermore, axitinib treatment significantly (p < 0.05) decreased reactive oxygen species production (0.90 ± 0.10; 0.44 ± 0.06, fluorescence units in high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively) and inhibited ERK pathway (1.64 ± 0.09; 0.73 ± 0.06, phosphorylated protein levels in fluctuating high glucose vs . axitinib 1 µM, respectively) in HRECs exposed to high glucose. The obtained results about the emerging polypharmacological profile support the hypothesis that axitinib could be a valid candidate to handle diabetic retinopathy, with ancillary mechanisms of action.

Exploring laser-induced acute and chronic retinal vein occlusion mouse models: Development, temporal in vivo imaging, and application perspectives.

Photodynamic venous occlusion is a commonly accepted method for establishing mouse models of retinal vein occlusion (RVO). However, existing model parameters do not distinguish between acute and chronic RVO subtypes. Large variations in laser energy seem to correlate with fluctuating retinopathy severity and high rates of venous recanalization during the acute phase, along with the variable levels of retinal perfusion during the chronic phase. After optimizing the modeling procedure and defining success and exclusion criteria, laser energy groups of 80mW, 100mW, and 120mW were established. Multimodal imaging confirmed that higher energy levels increased the incidence of retinal cystoid edema and intraretinal hemorrhage, exacerbated the severity of exudative retinal detachment, and reduced the venous recanalization rate. For the acute model, 100mW was considered an appropriate parameter for balancing moderate retinopathy and venous recanalization. Continuous imaging follow-up revealed that day 1 after RVO was the optimal observation point for peaking of retinal thickness and intensive occurrence of retinal cystic edema and intraretinal hemorrhage. After excluding the influence of venous recanalization on retinal thickness, acute retinal edema demonstrated a positive response to standard anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, validating the clinical relevance of the acute RVO model for further study in pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic efficacy. For the chronic model, the 120mW parameter with the lowest venous recanalization rate was applied, accompanied by an increase in both photocoagulation shots and range to ensure sustained vein occlusion. Imaging follow-up clarified non-ischemic retinopathy characterized by tortuosity and dilation of the distal end, branches, and adjacent veins of the occluded vein. These morphological changes are quantifiable and could be combined with electrophysiological functional assessment for treatment effectiveness evaluation. Moreover, the stable state of venous occlusion may facilitate investigations into response and compensation mechanisms under conditions of chronic retinal hypoperfusion.

Subretinal fluid in macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion

We identified characteristics of patients with subretinal fluid (SRF) in macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and determined their clinical outcomes after anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment. Fifty-seven eyes of BRVO patients with ME were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of SRF at diagnosis. We compared the aqueous profiles, ocular and systemic characteristics at baseline, and the clinical outcomes. The SRF group had significantly greater central subfield thickness (CST) values and poorer best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline compared to the non-SRF group. The former group had significantly higher aqueous levels of interleukin-8, VEGF, and placental growth factor. CST reduction and BCVA improvement during treatment were significantly greater in the SRF group than in the non-SRF group. Consequently, CST values were significantly lower in the SRF group than in the non-SRF group at 12 months, when BCVA did not differ significantly between the two groups. The SRF group required more frequent anti-VEGF treatment over 12 months and exhibited a higher rate of macular atrophy. Based on the aqueous profiles and the number of treatments required, the presence of SRF in BRVO patients appears to be associated with higher disease activity.

Ileal perforation at the site of peritoneal metastasis with intestinal infiltration by dual EGFR-VEGF pathway inhibition in an EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer patient.

Gastrointestinal (GI) perforation including ileal perforation is a rare complication of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Risk factors of GI perforation have not been fully understood. This report highlights the case of a patient who experienced GI perforation at the site of peritoneal metastasis with intestinal infiltration immediately after treatment with dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-VEGF pathway inhibition agents for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The administration of dual EGFR-VEGF pathway inhibition agents in EGFR mutant NSCLC patients appears to elevate the risk of GI perforation. This report provides insights into the association between EGFR mutant NSCLC and the susceptibility to GI perforation following treatment with dual EGFR-VEGF pathway inhibition agents.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Targeted Drugs in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are becoming a new treatment approach for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, the results regarding its efficacy compared with the standard regimen of targeted therapy are not consistent. Our aim was to conduct a meta-analysis of existing studies to reveal the differences in the efficacy and safety of the two systems of treatment. The related studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase from inception to June 30th, 2022. Data on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and rate of treatment- related adverse events (TrAEs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled and analyzed by Stata 12.0 software. A total of ten high-quality controlled clinical studies with 5,539 patients with uHCC were included. The hazard ratio (HR) of the OS and PFS were 0.80 (95% CI, 0.74-0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58-0.89), respectively. In addition, the odds ratio (OR) of the ORR and DCR were 3.39 (95% CI, 2.75-4.17) and 1.20 (95% CI, 0.84-1.73), respectively. The ORR of ICIs monotherapy, ICIs plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and ICIs plus ICIs were 16% (95% CI, 0.13-0.18), 17% (95% CI, 0.10-0.27), and 20% (95% CI, 0.16-0.24), respectively. For all included studies, the OR of the overall TrAEs was 0.51(95% CI, 0.22-1.18), and grade ≥ 3 TrAEs was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.53-1.14). ICIs were more effective than targeted drugs concerning survival periods and ORR in patients with uHCC while maintaining a stable safety profile.

Retrospective Large Database Study of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Treatments and Visual Outcomes Analysis in the United States.

Purpose: To evaluate a large database detailing the changes in visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness after various treatments for central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients with CSCR from January 2015 to September 2022 using the Vestrum Health Retina Database of aggregated de-identified electronic medical records from retina specialists in the United States. The cases of CSCR were categorized by age, sex, and treatment provided. Results: The annual incidence of CSCR was 1.72% (61 755 of 3 598 672 patient eyes), with a mean patient age of 53 years. Male eyes comprised 71.8% of the patient population. Eighty-five percent of patients received no treatment within 1 year of diagnosis. Of the patients needing treatment, 21% received thermal laser therapy, 23% photodynamic therapy, and 49% antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intraocular injection. Patients not receiving treatment had the best baseline and 1-year VA. All treatment groups had an increased percentage of patients gaining letters compared with patients not receiving treatment. Conclusions: Although most patients did not require treatment, those who received treatment generally did well, with a large proportion having visual gain. Statistical analysis suggests treatment has a positive impact on VA outcomes. Patients receiving combination treatment were older and had the least visual gain of the treated cohorts. Younger patients with CSCR treated with anti-VEGF (and without a secondary diagnosis of macular degeneration) had the greatest increase in VA at 1 year.

Successful treatment of retinopathy of prematurity in oculocutaneous albinism with OCA2 variants: a case report and review of literature

BackgroundOculocutaneous albinism (OCA) is a group of autosomal recessive hereditary disorders that affect melanin biosynthesis, resulting in abnormalities in hair, skin, and eyes. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a proliferative retinopathy mainly observed in premature infants with low birth weight and early gestational age, but it can also affect full-term infants or children with normal weight, particularly in developing countries. The coexistence of ROP and OCA is rare. There is limited documentation regarding treatment approaches, with few studies reporting positive outcomes with laser treatment due to the absence of melanin pigment. This study discusses the treatment challenges in a female infant diagnosed with ROP and OCA, and underscores the importance of genetic analysis in guiding therapeutic decisions for this rare comorbid condition.Case presentationThe study presents a case of ROP occurring concurrently with OCA. Genetic testing revealed two variants, c.727C > T (p.R243C) and c.1832 T > C (p.L611P), in the OCA2 gene, inherited from the patient's mother and father, respectively. The identified mutations were consistent with a diagnosis of OCA2, classified as a subtype of OCA. The patient initially received intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection, followed by laser photocoagulation therapy for a recurrent event. A favorable outcome was observed during the 2-month follow-up period.ConclusionsThe co-occurrence of ROP and OCA is a rare phenomenon, and this is the first recorded case in the Chinese population. The current case supports the use of laser as the primary treatment modality for ROP in OCA2 patients with partial pigmentation impairment. Furthermore, genetic analysis can aid in predicting the effectiveness of laser photocoagulation in this patient population.

Adaptive resistance of tumor cells to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A reversible phenomenon

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is an essential targeted strategy for malignant tumors, but its efficacy is severely constrained by drug resistance. The traditional view holds that the target of VEGF inhibition is endothelial cells, and thus compensatory angiogenesis is considered the main mechanism of drug resistance. In this study, we found that tumor cells themselves could develop acquired resistance to VEGF therapy, indicating an independent resistance mechanism apart from angiogenesis. Notably, this acquired resistance was temporary, disappearing completely four days after discontinuing exposure to the drug in vitro. Our findings suggest that tumor cells may also be targets of VEGF inhibition, and their response to treatment should not be overlooked in contributing to drug resistance.

Faricimab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema: from preclinical studies to phase 3 outcomes

AbstractIntravitreal anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the standard of care for diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD); however, vision gains and anatomical improvements are not sustained over longer periods of treatment, suggesting other relevant targets may be needed to optimize treatments. Additionally, frequent intravitreal injections can prove a burden for patients and caregivers. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) has been explored as an additional therapeutic target, due to the involvement of Ang-2 in DME and nAMD pathogenesis. Recent evidence supports the hypothesis that targeting both VEGF and Ang-2 may improve clinical outcomes in DME and nAMD compared with targeting VEGF alone by enhancing vascular stability, resulting in reduced macular leakage, prevention of neovascularization, and diminished inflammation. Faricimab, a novel bispecific antibody that targets VEGF-A and Ang-2, has been evaluated in clinical trials for DME (YOSEMITE/RHINE) and nAMD (TENAYA/LUCERNE). These trials evaluated faricimab against the anti-VEGFA/B and anti–placental growth factor fusion protein aflibercept, both administered by intravitreal injection. In addition to faricimab efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics, durability was evaluated during the trials using a treat-and-extend regimen. At 1 year, faricimab demonstrated non-inferior vision gains versus aflibercept across YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE. In YOSEMITE/RHINE, faricimab improved anatomic parameters versus aflibercept. Reduction of central subfield thickness (CST), and absence of both DME and intraretinal fluid were greater in faricimab- versus aflibercept-treated eyes. In TENAYA/LUCERNE, CST reductions were greater for faricimab than aflibercept at the end of the head-to-head phase (0–12 weeks), and were comparable with aflibercept at year 1, but with less frequent dosing. CST and vision gains were maintained during year 2 of both YOSEMITE/RHINE and TENAYA/LUCERNE. These findings suggest that dual Ang-2/VEGF-A pathway inhibition may result in greater disease control versus anti-VEGF alone, potentially addressing the unmet needs and reducing treatment burden, and improving real-world outcomes and compliance in retinal vascular diseases. Long-term extension studies (RHONE-X, AVONELLE-X) are ongoing. Current evidence suggests that dual inhibition with faricimab heralds the beginning of multitargeted treatment strategies inhibiting multiple, independent components of retinal pathology, with faricimab providing opportunities to reduce treatment burden and improve outcomes compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy.

Progression to Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol S suggested that vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage (VH) or tractional retinal detachment (TRD) was more common among eyes assigned initially to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). These clinical implications warrant further evaluation in the clinical practice setting. To explore outcomes of PDR treated with PRP monotherapy compared with matched patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. Retrospective cohort study using an aggregated electronic health records research network. Patients with PDR who received PRP or anti-VEGF monotherapy between January and September 2023 were included before propensity score matching. Patients were excluded with 6 or fewer months' follow-up after monotherapy or with a combination of PRP and anti-VEGF. Data were analyzed in September 2023. Patients with new PDR diagnoses stratified by monotherapy with PRP or anti-VEGF agents using Current Procedural Terminology code. Incidence of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), VH, or TRD. Among 6020 patients (PRP cohort: mean [SD] age, 64.8 [13.4]; 6424 [50.88%] female; 3562 [28.21%] Black, 6180 [48.95%] White, and 2716 [21.51%] unknown race; anti-VEGF cohort: mean [SD] age, 66.1 [13.2]; 5399 [50.52%] male; 2859 [26.75%] Black, 5377 [50.31%] White, and 2382 [22.29%] unknown race) who received treatment, PRP monotherapy was associated with higher rates of PPV when compared with patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy at 5 years (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36; RD, 1.37%; 95% CI, 0.39%-2.37%; P < .001), with similar associations at 1 and 3 years. PRP monotherapy was associated with higher rates of VH at 5 years (relative risk [RR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.52-1.95; risk difference [RD], 7.05; 95% CI, 5.41%-8.69%; P < .001) and higher rates of TRD at 5 years (RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 2.26-3.37; RD, 4.25%; 95% CI, 3.45%-5.05%; P < .001), with similar magnitudes of associations at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, when compared with patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. These findings support the hypothesis that patients with PDR treated with PRP monotherapy are more likely to develop VH, TRD, and undergo PPV when compared with matched patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. However, given the wide range in relative risk, confounding factors may account for some of the association between PRP vs anti-VEGF monotherapy and outcomes evaluated.

AI-driven discovery of blood xenobiotic biomarkers in neovascular age-related macular degeneration using iterative random forests.

To investigate the xenobiotic profiles of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) undergoing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) intravitreal therapy (IVT) to identify biomarkers indicative of clinical phenotypes through advanced AI methodologies. In this cross-sectional observational study, we analyzed 156 peripheral blood xenobiotic features in a cohort of 46 nAMD patients stratified by choroidal neovascularization (CNV) control under anti-VEGF IVT. We employed Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for measurement and leveraged an AI-driven iterative Random Forests (iRF) approach for robust pattern recognition and feature selection, aligning molecular profiles with clinical phenotypes. AI-augmented iRF models effectively refined the metabolite spectrum by discarding non-predictive elements. Perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and Ethyl β-glucopyranoside were identified as significant biomarkers through this process, associated with various clinically relevant phenotypes. Unlike single metabolite classes, drug metabolites were distinctly correlated with subretinal fluid presence. This study underscores the enhanced capability of AI, particularly iRF, in dissecting complex metabolomic data to elucidate the xenobiotic landscape of nAMD and environmental impact on the disease. The preliminary biomarkers discovered offer promising directions for personalized treatment strategies, although further validation in broader cohorts is essential for clinical application.

Switching to an Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant after Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review.

Among working-age people, diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema are currently considered the main causes of blindness. Nowadays, intravitreal injections are widely acknowledged as a significant milestone in ophthalmology, especially for the treatment of several retinal diseases, including diabetic macular edema. In particular, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents are typically the first line of treatment; however, monthly injections are required, at least, during the loading dosage. Notably, an intravitreal 0.7 mg dexamethasone (DEX) implant (Ozurdex®, AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, USA) is considered a legitimate substitute treatment for diabetic eyes that have not responded to anti-VEGF treatment. In fact, clinical trials and real-life studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and safety of an intravitreal DEX implant in treating such conditions over a period of three to six months. For this reason, wisely selecting diabetic patients might be crucial to decreasing the load of injections in clinics and hospitals. The purpose of this review is to analyze the available scientific literature to highlight the benefits, efficacy, and clinical criteria for choosing whether to switch from intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy to an intravitreal DEX implant in diabetic macular edema.

Risk of post-injection endophthalmitis peaks within the first three injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A nationwide registry-based study.

To report the incidence of post-injection endophthalmitis (PIE) and the cumulative risk associated with repeated injections of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). We employed nationwide registries in Denmark to include all individuals aged ≥40 years who received at least one intravitreal anti-VEGF injection in 2007-2022. Our primary endpoint PIE was identified using specific diagnostic codes for endophthalmitis and procedure codes for vitreous biopsy within 10 days prior to and 120 days post-injection. Patients were stratified according to the underlying diagnoses for which they received the treatment. The relative risk (RR) for PIE was calculated between groups based on the number of injections received by the patients. We identified 60 825 patients who received intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment during study time, with a median age of 77.2 years and females constituting 58.1%. We identified 232 cases of PIE after 1 051 549 injections during follow-up, resulting in an incidence of 0.022% [95% CI 0.019%-0.025%]. Despite a linear growth in annual anti-VEGF use, the incidence remained stable at 0.020% [95% CI 0.017%-0.023%] from 2013 to 2022. Compared to patients receiving 1-3 injections, RR for patients receiving 4-20, 21-40, and >40 injections were 0.46 [95% CI 0.34-0.63], 0.32 [95% CI 0.21-0.50], and 0.54 [95% CI 0.36-0.81], respectively. Findings were similar across the different diagnoses. Based on 16 years of nationwide registry data, this study identified a low and stable incidence of PIE. Notably, the highest risk of endophthalmitis was within the first three anti-VEGF injections.

Advancements in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: Current Strategies and Future Directions

This narrative review examines current and emerging treatment strategies for diabetic macular edema (DME), a complication of diabetic retinopathy characterised by fluid accumulation in the macula, which can lead to vision impairment. The incidence of DME is particularly high in patients with long-standing diabetes and advanced retinopathy. The current treatment options for DME include anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents, corticosteroids, and laser therapies. Anti-VEGF agents, including bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and the more recently developed brolucizumab and faricimab, have been demonstrated to reduce macular thickness and improve visual acuity. Brolucizumab offers the advantage of fewer injections due to its longer duration of action, although it carries a higher risk of ocular inflammation compared to other anti-VEGF agents. The dual inhibition of the VEGF and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) pathways by faricimab may enhance vascular stability and reduce inflammation, potentially improving patient outcomes. Steroid therapies, including dexamethasone, fluocinolone acetonide, and triamcinolone acetonide, represent an alternative for patients who do not respond adequately to anti-VEGF treatment. Laser therapies, including focal, navigated, and subthreshold laser treatments, remain a crucial component in the management of DME, with the ability to seal leaking vessels and reduce fluid accumulation. In order to achieve the best outcomes for patients, it is essential to continue to advance these treatment modalities and adopt a personalised, multifaceted approach.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor biosimilars for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor biosimilars for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Application of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody restores the function of saliva secretion in a type 2 diabetes mouse model

ObjectivesXerostomia, a common complication of type 2 diabetes, leads to an increased risk of caries, dysphagia, and dysgeusia. Although anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibodies, such as ranibizumab (RBZ), have been used to treat diabetic retinopathy, their effects on the salivary glands are unknown. This study evaluated the effects of RBZ on salivary glands to reduce inflammation and restore salivary function in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes. MethodsMale KK-Ay mice with type 2 diabetes (10–12 weeks old) were used. The diabetes mellitus (DM) group received phosphate-buffered saline, while the DM + RBZ group received an intraperitoneal administration of RBZ (100 μg/kg) 24 h before the experiment. ResultsEx vivo perfusion experiments showed a substantial increase in salivary secretion from the submandibular gland (SMG) in the DM + RBZ group. In addition, the mRNA expression levels of TNF-α and IL-1β were considerably lower in this group. In contrast, those of aquaporin 5 were substantially higher in the DM + RBZ group, as revealed by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Furthermore, the number of lymphocyte infiltration spots in the SMG was notably lower in the DM + RBZ group. Finally, intracellular Ca2+ signaling in acinar cells was considerably higher in the DM + RBZ group than that in the DM group. ConclusionTreating a type 2 diabetic mouse model with RBZ restored salivary secretion through its anti-inflammatory effects.

Timing of Switching to Steroid Implants in Cases of Recalcitrant Diabetic Macular Edema Not Responding to Anti-vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Therapy: A Real-World Study.

Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of the timing of the steroid switch on both visual and anatomical outcomes in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes that have shown an inadequate response to multiple intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections. In the treatment of DME, anti-VEGF injections are typically the initial course of action. However, in cases where DME persists despite anti-VEGF treatment, intravitreal dexamethasone implants (Ozurdex®, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) are often utilized. Despite this, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the optimal timing for transitioning to steroid treatment. This study aims to shed light on the potential benefits of adjusting the timing of the steroid switch in cases of recalcitrant DME. Methods The eyes (n = 105) of 77 patients with recalcitrant DME were included in this retrospective, interventional, comparative study comprising three groups: participants switched to steroid implants after three anti-VEGF injections (Group I), four to six anti-VEGF injections (Group II), and more than six anti-VEGF injections (Group III). Anti-VEGF treatment failure was defined as a central retinal thickness (CRT) of ≥300 microns and/or a lack of visual improvement (≤1 line of visual gain according to Snellen acuity). The last follow-up took place after 10-12 weeks of Ozurdex® injections. Results Improvement was observed in 19 eyes (46%), 17 eyes (50%), and 10 eyes (33%) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively, after switching to dexamethasone implants. The best overall results (an improvement in vision and stabilization) were seen in Group II (32 eyes, 94%). The decrease in CRT was statistically significant in all three groups. Conclusion Intravitreal dexamethasone implants improved functional and morphological outcomes in anti-VEGF-resistant DME eyes. After four to six anti-VEGF injections, switching to a steroid implant resulted in the best functional results.

Factors Involved in Anti-VEGF Treatment Decisions for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Insights from Real-World Clinical Practice.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are widely prescribed for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Although studies have investigated patient choice of anti-VEGF agent, little is known regarding factors that influence physician preference of anti-VEGF agent for their patients. To describe physician rationale and challenges in prescribing anti-VEGF treatments for patients with nAMD. Data were drawn from the Adelphi Real World nAMD Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey with retrospective data capture of physicians and their patients with nAMD in the United States between October 2021 and May 2022. Physicians (n = 56) reported data for up to 13 consecutively consulting patients (n = 451), including current anti-VEGF treatments used, factors affecting physicians' choice of anti-VEGF agent and treatment strategy, and restrictions on specific agents. Most physicians prefer employing a "treat-and-extend" treatment strategy, over "fixed interval" or "pro re nata" strategies. However, in routine clinical practice, "treat-and-extend" was reported for less than half of nAMD-diagnosed eyes. Top factors influencing physician choice of anti-VEGF agent and treatment strategy included maximizing clinical benefit (eg visual acuity gains and fluid control), patient convenience, and reducing out-of-pocket costs. However, physicians also reported facing substantial roadblocks in prescribing their choice of anti-VEGF agent, including restrictions on approved agents and gaps in insurance coverage. Persistent fluid was the most common physician-selected reason for switching a patient away from an anti-VEGF agent. Physicians face barriers to prescribing their preferred anti-VEGF agents in real-world healthcare settings. Overcoming these challenges may improve treatment outcomes for patients with nAMD.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF): its function in proliferative diabetic retinopathy management

Introduction. Among working-age adults, diabetes is a primary cause of visual impairment. Pan-retinal photocoagulation, the standard treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy, is effective but comes with well-established adverse effects, including limitations on the peripheral visual field. The mechanism of vascular proliferation is thought to be triggered by vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF). Anti-VEGF medications have been studied extensively in the treatment of diabetic macular edema, and the results suggest that treatment with anti-VEGF medications causes a decrease in diabetic retinopathy. Anti-VEGF therapies can be used to treat underlying proliferative diabetic retinopathy in cases of vitreous bleeding when platelet-rich plasma cannot be used, delaying, or reducing the necessity for a vitrectomy. However, the limitations of anti-VEGF therapy require careful patient selection and constant observation. Recent clinical trials and recommendations for the use of anti-VEGF in proliferative diabetic retinopathy are presented in this review. Material and methods. The effectiveness of anti-VEGF medicines in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy was the subject of a comprehensive review of the scientific and medical literature. A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, and HINARI databases, considering relevant articles published in the last 10 years. The search terms used (in English) were: “angiogenesis inhibitors”, “anti-VEGF”, “pan-retinal photocoagulation”, “intravitreal injection”, “diabetic retinopathy”. Accurate diagnosis, side effects, quality of life, and patient satisfaction were analyzed and compared for each treatment option. Results. Anti-VEGF treatments have been demonstrated to be beneficial in reducing macular edema, enhancing visual acuity, and slowing the advancement of diabetic retinopathy. While generally safe, different anti-VEGF medicines have varied side effects profiles. Conclusion. When choosing an anti-VEGF treatment for diabetic retinopathy, factors such as patient satisfaction, quality of life, side effects, and correct diagnosis should be taken into account. While anti-VEGF treatments show promise, further study is required to fully understand their advantages and disadvantages and to optimize their application.