Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor Agents Research Articles

P0861 Comparative effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab versus anti-tumour necrosis Factor agents as first- or second-line biologics in Crohn´s disease: a real-world multicentric observational study

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST), an antibody targeting the p40 subunit of interleukin-12/23, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). However, comparative real-world data regarding the positioning of biologic therapies, particularly UST versus anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents, remain limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of UST and anti-TNF agents in biologic-naïve and biologic-failure CD patients. Methods A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted, including patients with moderate to severe CD initiating first- or second-line biologic treatment with UST or anti-TNF agents [infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA)]. Propensity score adjustment (1/PS) was applied to address confounders. Primary endpoints were clinical remission (Harvey-Bradshaw Index ≤3), endoscopic remission (SES-CD ≤3 or Rutgeerts score I0), and steroid-free clinical remission at week 52. Secondary outcomes included clinical response, primary/secondary loss of response, treatment persistence, biochemical remission, adverse events (AEs), hospitalisation, and surgeries. Results A total of 536 CD patients (172 IFX, 132 ADA, 236 UST) were analysed. Clinical remission at week 52 was achieved by 78.1% of UST and 75.7% of anti-TNF patients in the biologic-naïve group (p=0.25), and 52.2% of UST and 50.5% of anti-TNF in biologic-failure patients (p=0.31). Steroid-free clinical remission rates were similar between UST and anti-TNF groups: 80.5% vs 80.1% (p=0.99) in biologic-naïve and 81.2% vs 77.3% (p=0.46) in biologic-failure patients. Endoscopic remission was observed in 74.8% of UST vs 68.8% of anti-TNF patients (p=0.81) in biologic-naïve, and 50.6% vs 46.8% (p=0.72) in biologic-failure. Serious AEs were more frequent with anti-TNF agents in biologic-failure patients (28.3% vs 12.5%; p<0.01). UST demonstrated higher treatment persistence in biologic-naïve patients (96.9% vs 80.8%; p=0.029) and lower CD relapse rates (3.08% vs 11.11%; p=0.01). Conclusion UST and anti-TNF agents exhibit comparable effectiveness for CD treatment regardless of prior biologic exposure. UST showed superior treatment persistence and a better safety profile, particularly in biologic-naïve patients.

P1046 Risk Factors for Complications After Crohn’s Disease Surgery : A tertiary monocentric study

Abstract Background Crohn’s disease needs a multidisciplinary approach, and surgery will ultimately be necessary for most patients. Complications usually occur after surgery. Objective This study aims to present complication rates in surgically treated Crohn’s disease patients at a single institution and to determine possible risk factors and also to determinate the impact of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents on the postoperative course. Methods This was a single-center retrospective study that included 121 CD patients who underwent elective ileo-coecale resection (ICR) in a tertiary center between January 2016 and September 2024. Risk factors for overall postoperative complications (POC) and intra-abdominal septic complications (IASC) were assessed with univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Over 121 patients, 77 (63%) were male and 44 (39%) were female, the mean age of our population was 27+/- 7,5 yo, The most common early complications were wound infection (22%) and intra-abdominal abscess formation (14%) and The incisional hernia was the most common late complication (n = 4, 3.6%). In multivariate analysis, anti-TNF agents (n=57), as either monotherapy or combination treatment, were not associated with an increased risk for overall POC (P=0.71) or IASC (P=0.83). Patients with colonic involvement (P = 0.001), penetrating disease character (P = 0.037), concomitant fistula and intra-abdominal abscess existence (P = 0.043), disease duration >10 years (P=O,OO4), or previous intestinal resections had significantly higher rates of both overall POC and IASC. Conclusion Preoperative administration of anti-TNF agents or other immunosuppressive regimens was not a risk factor for total POC or IASC. A Colonic involvement, penetrating disease, fistula, concomitant abscess and fistula correlated with both overall POC and IASC.

Sepsis-associated liver injury: Mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets

In this editorial, we examined a recent article in the World Journal of Gastroenterology that focused on sepsis-associated liver injury (SLI) and its treatment. SLI is a serious complication of sepsis, primarily caused by microcirculatory disturbances, the gut-liver axis, and inflammatory responses. Specific treatment recommendations for SLI are lacking. The gut-liver axis represents a potential therapeutic target, with metformin showing promise in modulating the gut microbiome and enhancing intestinal barrier function. Although immunomodulatory therapies are being explored, anti-tumor necrosis factor agents and interleukin-1 receptor antagonists have not demonstrated significant clinical benefits. Statins may reduce liver inflammation and prevent injury in sepsis, but their clinical application is limited. Reduced D-related human leucocyte antigen expression on monocytes and lymphocytes suggests immune suppression in patients, indicating that corticosteroids could reverse clinical deterioration in severe infections and address adrenal cortical insufficiency. Current large-scale studies on glucocorticoid therapy for sepsis have yielded mixed results, likely due to inadequate assessment of the immune status of the host. Future research should prioritize the development of personalized immunotherapy tailored to patients’ immune profiles, focusing on identifying novel indicators of immune status and advancing immunomodulatory targets and therapeutics for septic patients.

Five principles and protocols for the clinician based on the 2021 ERS and BTS statements for treating sarcoidosis.

The European Respiratory Society (ERS) and the British Thoracic Society (BTS) have recently published their statements on the treatment of sarcoidosis. There are five key questions in sarcoidosis treatment that need to be addressed: when to treat, how to initiate treatment, how long to treat, when and how to change treatment, and how to treat relapses. Herein, we describe the principles and protocols to answer these questions based on the ERS and BTS statements and other expert reviews. Pulmonary or extrapulmonary sarcoidosis should be treated with anti-inflammatory therapy if it significantly impairs the quality of life (QoL), causes significant organ dysfunction, or threatens to cause organ damage, disability, or death. If treatment is initiated for improving the QoL alone, low-dose (10 mg/day) prednisone is a good initial treatment that can be tapered and stopped over 3 months. Disease that causes significant organ dysfunction needs to be treated with medium-dose glucocorticoids (initial daily dose, 20 mg of prednisone equivalent) tapered over a minimum duration of 6 months. Worsening of disease while tapering treatment indicates that longer (9-24 months) treatment may be necessary. If a daily prednisone dose of >10 mg is required for >6 months to maintain remission, it is best to use a second-line drug such as methotrexate or azathioprine. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, such as infliximab or adalimumab, may be used to treat inflammatory disease that persists on combination treatment with glucocorticoids and a second-line agent.

Improved injection site reactions after switching from adalimumab reference to adalimumab biosimilar LBAL for ulcerative colitis: A case report.

Adalimumab (ADA) is an antitumor necrosis factor agent that is used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. However, its cost has resulted in varying degrees of restricted access across global healthcare economies. Biosimilars are agents that contain a similar version of the active substance of an already approved original biologic agent and are intended to be used for the same indication as the reference product. In general, biosimilars follow the originator; therefore, information on its efficacy and safety had been few. Some studies have reported on replacement of the originator with a biosimilar of the same efficacy because of medical reasons. A 15-year-old girl with steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis that relapsed after vedolizumab was treated with ADA reference. Six weeks after starting ADA reference, her gastrointestinal symptoms had completely resolved, however, immediately after the eighth dose of ADA reference, redness, swelling, and pruritus were noted at the injection site on the left thigh. Allergic reaction caused by the ADA reference. ADA reference was changed to ADA biosimilar LBAL. ADA biosimilar LBAL was continued without any symptoms, such as local swelling, redness, or itching. In addition, there was no deterioration of gastrointestinal symptoms. We showed the efficacy and safety of ADA biosimilar LBAL as an alternative to ADA reference, which caused injection site reactions. Changing from ADA reference to ADA biosimilar because of adverse events may be an option that needs careful observation, considering that the originator and the biosimilar are not exactly the same.

Efficacy and safety of infliximab or adalimumab in severe mucocutaneous Behçet’s syndrome refractory to traditional immunosuppressants: a 6-month, multicentre, randomised controlled, prospective, parallel group, single-blind trial

IntroductionEvidence from randomised controlled trials on anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents in patients with Behçet’s syndrome (BS) is low.MethodWe conducted a phase 3, multicentre, prospective, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group study to...

Optimal timeframe for achieving biochemical remission in Crohn's disease patients treated with first-line biologics: A retrospective multicenter study.

Predicting treatment response in Crohn's disease (CD) patients initiating biological therapy is crucial. The first step involves considering symptom control and normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP). However, data on the actual rates of achieving CRP normalization and the appropriate timeframe are lacking. Therefore, we aim to investigate the rate of attaining CRP normalization and identify its optimal timeframe in CD patients initiating biological therapy. In this retrospective multi-center study, we analyzed moderate to severe CD patients initiating biological therapy from January 2012 to July 2023. The primary outcome was the rate and timeframe for achieving CRP normalization. Secondary outcomes included clinical outcomes in patients who achieved CRP normalization and factors associated with early CRP normalization. Of 183 patients, 123 (67.2%) achieved CRP normalization, with a median duration of 3.8 months (interquartile range 1.4 to 7.4 months). The duration and value difference for CRP normalization between anti-tumor necrosis factor agents, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab were statistically insignificant. Cumulative rates of CD-related hospitalization, intestinal resection, and drug discontinuation over 8 years were 11.4%, 2.4%, and 12.2%, respectively. The duration of CRP normalization correlates with drug discontinuation (area under the curve: 0.64). Treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid (HR 2.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-6.11) and high albumin level (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.61) favored early CRP normalization, whereas structuring behavior less likely than inflammatory behavior (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-0.96). We have provided the actual rate of achieving CRP normalization and its appropriate timeframe as an initial target in CD treatment.

Lateral flow test versus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure infliximab trough concentrations: A head-to-head comparison.

Infliximab is an antitumour necrosis factor agent used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Measurement of infliximab trough concentrations (C-troughs) are used to optimize drug exposure and improve outcomes. Currently, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) are used predominantly for this purpose. Novel lateral flow immunoassays provide a rapid result. We collected 100 paired serum samples of adolescents and young adults with IBD, who were treated with infliximab maintenance infusions. C-troughs were measured with the Quantum Blue® lateral flow test (QB) with ELISA. Results were categorized as low-range (mean C-trough ≤5 µg/mL) or high-range (>5 µg/mL). A Bland-Altman plot was created with limits of clinical acceptability set at ≤2 µg/mL for low-range and ≤40% for high-range C-troughs. A concordance matrix was created to evaluate the C-trough-based clinical scenario (whether or not to escalate infliximab) using a cutoff value of 5 µg/mL. Agreement between QB and ELISA was good (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.85). In the low-range, 90% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79-96) of measurements were within the limits of clinical acceptability. In the high-range this was 67% (95% CI: 53-79). QB provided higher results than ELISA. The concordance matrix showed 81% agreement (95% CI: 72-88, κ: 0.62). Lateral flow- and ELISA-based infliximab C-trough measurements were in agreement. The swift establishment of infliximab C-troughs matters for patients experiencing increased disease activity. In the event of a low C-trough, prompt dose escalation can be initiated.

Diagnosis and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Associated Spondyloarthritis.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated spondyloarthritis (SpA) is common but remains poorly understood. In this review article, we aimed to provide guidance regarding the diagnosis and management of this condition. For diagnosis of IBD-associated peripheral SpA (IBD-pSpA), we recommend collaboration with rheumatology for incorporation of clinical symptoms, physical examination findings, joint imaging if applicable, and available diagnostic criteria. For the management of IBD-pSpA, we first recommend assessment and treatment of underlying luminal IBD disease activity. We provide guidance regarding positioning of advanced therapies for IBD in patients with IBD-pSpA based on the limited available literature. For diagnosis of IBD-associated axial SpA, we recommend rheumatology referral to make the diagnosis based on incorporation of symptoms, laboratory data, imaging findings (sacroiliitis), and available diagnostic criteria. For the management of axial SpA, we recommend comanagement with rheumatology and use of either antitumor necrosis factor agents or Janus kinase inhibitors, when applicable.

Comparative Efficacy of Novel Biologics, Antitumour Necrosis Factor Agents, and Immunomodulators to Prevent Postoperative Recurrence in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Our objective was to compare the efficacy of novel biologics (like vedolizumab and ustekinumab), anti-tumour necrosis factor agents (anti-TNFs), and immunomodulators (IMMs) in preventing postoperative recurrence (POR) of Crohn's disease (CD). We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases up to December 2023 to identify placebo-controlled, no-treatment-comparison, or positive-controlled studies for the prevention of POR in CD. Endoscopic and clinical recurrence were the primary and secondary endpoint for the efficacy assessment. We conducted traditional direct and Bayesian network meta-analyses to evaluate the preventive effects of selected drugs. Additionally, we ranked interventions based on their scores under the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 17 studies involving 2786 patients were included. In the direct meta-analysis, anti-TNFs, vedolizumab, and IMMs showed greater efficacy in preventing endoscopic POR, compared to controls (placebo or no treatment). When it came to preventing clinical POR, anti-TNFs and IMMs outperformed controls. The network meta-analysis revealed that the risk of endoscopic POR was considerably lower in patients receiving anti-TNFs, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab compared to controls. Regarding the reduction of clinical POR, only anti-TNFs showed significant efficacy compared to controls. Vedolizumab and anti-TNFs were ranked as the most effective strategies in preventing endoscopic and clinical recurrence, respectively. According to direct and network meta-analysis, in CD patients after surgical resection, novel biologics, especially vedolizumab, were quite effective in decreasing the risk of endoscopic POR, whereas anti-TNFs appeared to perform best in reducing the risk of clinical POR.

Factors associated with cause-specific discontinuation of long-term anti-tumor necrosis factor agent use in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective cohort study

ObjectTo investigate the factors associated with cause-specific discontinuation of long-term anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent use in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).MethodsAS patients who initiated first-line anti-TNF treatment between 2004 and 2018 and continued treatment for at least two years were enrolled in the study. Enrolled patients were observed until the last visit, discontinuation of treatment, or September 2022. Reasons for discontinuation of the first-line anti-TNF agent were categorized into the following: (1) clinical remission, (2) loss of efficacy, (3) adverse events, and (4) other reasons including loss to follow-up, cost, or reimbursement issues. A cumulative incidence function curve was used to visualize the cumulative failure rates over time for each specific reason. Univariable and multivariable cause-specific hazard models were utilized to identify factors associated with cause-specific discontinuation of the first-line anti-TNF agent.ResultsA total of 429 AS patients was included in the study, with 121 treated with adalimumab (ADA), 176 with etanercept (ETN), 89 with infliximab (INF), and 43 with golimumab (GLM). The median overall survival on the first-line anti-TNF agent was 10.6 (7.9–14.5) years. Among the patients, 103 (24.0%) discontinued treatment, with 36 (34.9%) due to inefficacy, 31 (30.1%) due to clinical remission, 15 (14.6%) due to adverse events, and 21 (20.4%) due to other reasons. Patients treated with ETN had a lower risk of discontinuation due to clinical remission compared to those receiving ADA (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 [0.21–0.99], P = 0.048). Higher baseline Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; HR 1.31 [1.04–1.65], P = 0.023) and INF use were linked to a higher risk of treatment discontinuation for inefficacy compared to ADA use (HR 4.53 [1.45–14.16], P = 0.009). Older age was related to an increased risk of discontinuation due to infection-related adverse events (HR 1.07 [1.02–1.12], P = 0.005), and current smoking was a risk factor for discontinuation due to other reasons (HR 6.22 [1.82–21.28], P = 0.004).ConclusionAS patients on their first anti-TNF treatment for at least two years demonstrated a favorable long-term treatment retention rate, with a 24.0% discontinuation rate over a 10.6-year overall survival period. The predictors for discontinuation varied by causes, underscoring the complexity of treatment response and the importance of personalized approaches to treatment management.

Short term effectiveness of ustekinumab versus vedolizumab in Crohn's disease after failure of anti-TNF agents: An observational comparative study design with a Bayesian analysis.

Crohn's disease (CD) is a debilitating gastrointestinal disease with complex etiology. Although effective, recipients of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents may experience primary or secondary nonresponse, necessitating alternative treatments. This study is intended to compare the short-term effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in treating CD after failure of multiple lines of anti-TNF therapy using real-world data. A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, including adults (≥18 years old) with CD who did not respond to anti-TNF therapy. Primary endpoints were clinical improvement per the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) scores and remission at 12 weeks on an ordinal outcome scale. Secondary endpoints included clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission; clinical response; corticosteroid-free days; and cumulative steroid dose. Proportional odds and logistic regression Bayesian models were used to analyze outcomes, and the probability of treatment effectiveness was calculated from the posterior distribution. The study included 101 patients (ustekinumab, n = 71 and vedolizumab, n = 30) with a median age of 32 years (IQR: 26.0-38.0); 54.4% were male. At 12 weeks, the HBI endpoint showed an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-1.31), favoring ustekinumab, with a 75% probability of treatment effectiveness over vedolizumab. The clinical ordinal scale had an aOR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.26-1.35) with a 73% probability of effectiveness for ustekinumab. Ustekinumab was also associated with favorable outcomes in secondary endpoints, reaching up to a 90% probability of effectiveness. In CD patients with anti-TNF failure, ustekinumab was more effective than vedolizumab in the short term. These real-world insights contribute to understanding CD management but require validation in larger prospective studies and randomized controlled trials.

Hepatitis B reactivation in PsA patients: an SLR and meta-analysis for IL-17, IL-23 and JAK inhibitors.

Hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) constitutes a side effect of the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Even though HBVr risk of conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents has long been established, the risk of targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs and anti-interleukin (anti-IL) agents remains largely unknown. We conducted a SLR (PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE) and metanalysis to examine the HBVr risk for the following: anti-IL17, anti-IL12/23, anti-IL23 and JAK-inhibitors in patients with chronic HBV infection (HBsAg presence or detectable HBV-DNA) and in patients with prior HBV infection (HBcAb-positive and HBsAg-negative). Meta-analysis was performed using both the fixed and random effects method and was conducted using the R computing language. Overall, our study revealed a low HBVr risk of < 6% in all agents; the risk was significantly higher for people having chronic compared with those with resolved HBV (14,4% vs 5.1%, respectively p< 0.01). There was no difference among different drugs in the HBVr rates [anti-IL-17: 4% (95% CI: 1-9%), anti-IL-12/IL-23: 2% (95% CI: 0-5%), JAK-inhibitors: 4% (95% CI: 1-8%), anti-IL23: 0%]. Of note, HBVr rate reached 28% in patients with chronic HBV who did not receive anti-viral treatment. For patients with resolved hepatitis the respective percentage was 4.7%. Overall, our meta-analysis shows that patients with chronic HBV receiving anti-IL-17, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-23 and JAK-inhibitors have significant risk for HBVr, especially if they are not under anti-viral treatment. In contrast, resolved HBV seems to offer minor risk for HBVr even without anti-viral treatment.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab and Anti-TNF in Elderly Crohn's Disease Patients.

Biologic therapies are associated with increased infection risk among elderly patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there are few data on the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab compared with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in the elderly. The study sought to compare the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents in elderly Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Patients ≥60 years of age who commenced ustekinumab or an anti-TNF agent for CD were included in this retrospective multicenter cohort. The primary outcome was incidence of serious infections requiring hospitalization. Effectiveness was assessed by clinical remission, clinical response, and treatment persistence rates at 6 months. We adjusted for confounders using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and performed a logistic regression analysis to assess factors associated with serious infections, clinical remission, and treatment persistence. Eighty-three patients commencing ustekinumab and 124 commencing anti-TNF therapy were included. There was no difference in serious infection rates between anti-TNF agents (2.8%) and ustekinumab (3.1%) (P = .924) after propensity adjustment. Clinical remission rates were comparable at 6 months for ustekinumab (55.9%) and anti-TNF agents (52.4%) (P = .762). There was a significant reduction in HBI at 6 months in both groups. Treatment persistence was comparable between ustekinumab (90.6%) and anti-TNF agents (90.0%) at 6 months. Cox regression analysis did not show differences in treatment persistence (hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.57-2.61; P = .594) and serious infection incidence (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-7.57; P = .709) by 6 months. We observed comparable safety and effectiveness for ustekinumab and anti-TNF agents in treating elderly CD patients.

Risks and benefits of anti-TNF therapy for ulcerative colitis in a patient with autoimmune hepatitis-related cirrhosis: Case report.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) characterized by continuous inflammation of the colonic mucosa. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, circulating autoantibodies, interface hepatitis, and favorable response to immunosuppression. An association between IBD and AIH is uncommon, and experts have suggested that in patients with overlapping IBD and AIH, the anti-tumor necrosis factor agents can be used. Therefore, this study reports a rare case of a patient with liver cirrhosis due to AIH and UC refractory to conventional treatment and discusses the risks and benefits of using anti-tumor necrosis factor in both conditions. A 28-year-old female presented with symptoms of diarrhea, abdominal pain, asthenia, and inappetence, accompanied by abdominal collateral circulation, anemia, alteration of liver enzymes, and elevation of C-reactive protein levels. The patient underwent a liver biopsy, which was consistent with liver cirrhosis due to AIH. Colonoscopy showed an inflammatory process throughout the colon, compatible with moderately active UC. The patient received mesalazine, azathioprine, and corticotherapy, with no control of the inflammatory process. Faced with refractoriness to drug treatment and side effects of corticosteroids with an increased risk of severe infection due to cirrhosis, we opted to use infliximab for the treatment of UC. The patient presented with a clinical response and infliximab therapy was maintained. Eight months after starting infliximab therapy, the patient developed pneumonia with complications from disseminated intravascular coagulation and died. AIH is a rare cause of elevated transaminase levels in patients with UC. The best treatment to control the 2 conditions should be evaluated with vigilance for the side effects of medications, mainly infections, especially in patients with cirrhosis.

Application of Drug Repurposing Approach for Therapeutic Intervention of Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), represented by Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) characterized by chronic relapsing intestinal inflammation, abdominal pain, cramping, loss of appetite, fatigue, diarrhoea, and weight loss. Although the etiology of IBD remains unclear, it is believed to be an interaction between genes, and environmental factors, such as an imbalance of the intestinal microbiota, changing food habits, an ultra-hygiene environment, and an inappropriate immune system. The development of novel effective therapies is stymied by a lack of understanding of the aetiology of IBD. The current therapy involves the use of aminosalicylates, immunosuppressants, and corticosteroids that can effectively manage symptoms, induce and sustain remission, prevent complications, modify the course of the disease, provide diverse treatment options, showcase advancements in biologic therapies, and enhance the overall quality of life. However, the efficacy of current therapy is overshadowed by a plethora of adverse effects, such as loss of weight, mood swings, skin issues, loss of bone density, higher vulnerability to infections, and elevated blood pressure. Biologicals, like anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, can stimulate an autoimmune response in certain individuals that may diminish the effectiveness of the medication over time, necessitating a switch to alternative treatments. The response of IBD patients to current drug therapy is quite varied, which can lead to disease flares that underlines the urgent need to explore alternative treatment option to address the unmet need of developing new treatment strategies for IBD with high efficacy and fewer adverse effects. Drug repurposing is a novel strategy where existing drugs that have already been validated safe in patients for the management of certain diseases are redeployed to treat other, unindicated diseases. The present narrative review focuses on potential drug candidates that could be repurposed for the management of IBD using on-target and off-target strategies. It covers their preclinical, clinical assessment, mechanism of action, and safety profiles, and forecasts their appropriateness in the management of IBD. The review presents useful insights into the most promising candidates for repurposing, like anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic troxerutin, which has been found to improve the DSS-induced colitis in rats, an antiosteoarthritic drug diacetylrhein that has been found to have remarkable ameliorating effects on DSS-induced colitis via anti-oxidant and anti- inflammatory properties and by influencing both apoptosis and pyroptosis. Topiramate, an antiepileptic and anticonvulsant drug, has remarkably decreased overall pathophysiological and histopathological events in the experimental model of IBD in rodents by its cytokine inhibitory action.

Nordic inflammatory bowel disease treatment strategy trial: protocol for the NORDTREAT randomised controlled biomarker-strategy trial

IntroductionThe absence of reliable prognostic markers poses a challenge to the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with aggressive disease may not receive sufficient treatment with conventional ‘step-up’ therapy,...

Systematic review: Methotrexate-A poorly understood and underused medication in inflammatory bowel disease.

Methotrexate, an immunosuppressant used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for over 30 years, remains underused compared to thiopurines. To review the efficacy, safety, optimal dosing and delivery regimens of methotrexate in adults with IBD. We conducted a systematic review of studies involving patients with IBD treated with methotrexate from inception to August 2023. All studies were included from the MEDLINE database via PubMed. For Crohn's disease, we included eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 17 observational studies. Parenteral methotrexate effectively increased remission rates in steroid-dependent patients at 25 mg/week for 16 weeks and at 15 mg/week for maintenance. Methotrexate can be used in combination with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents to reduce immunogenicity. Data comparing thiopurines and methotrexate remain scarce. For ulcerative colitis (UC), we included five RCTs and 10 observational studies were included; there was no evidence to support the use of methotrexate in (UC). We extracted safety data from 17 studies; mild-to-moderate adverse effects were common. The incidence of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis was low. Methotrexate is effective at inducing and maintaining remission in steroid-refractory Crohn's disease and can reduce anti-TNF-induced immunogenicity when used in combination therapy. Data regarding tolerance and safety are reassuring. These findings challenge preconceived ideas on methotrexate and suggest that it is a valid first-line conventional option for the treatment of mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease.

Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part II: Risk of Infections. A Narrative Review.

The risk of infections associated with biological drugs (BD) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) has been extensively explored in the literature. However, there is a dearth of studies that evaluate both pharmacological groups together and, furthermore, compare them. Here, we review the risk of infections associated with BD and JAKi used in dermatology. A narrative review was performed. All relevant articles evaluating the risk of infection and opportunistic infections with BD and JAKi between January 2010 and February 2024 were selected. Overall, the incidence of infections, serious infections, and opportunistic infections associated with BD and JAKi is low, but higher than in the general population. JAKi approved for dermatological disorders (abrocitinib, baricitinib, deucravacitinib, upadacitinib, ritlecitinib, and topical ruxolitinib) have been shown to be safe, and present a low rate of infections. We found an elevated risk, especially with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib at high doses). Specific associations with infections include tuberculosis and tuberculosis reactivation with anti-TNF agents and tocilizumab; candidiasis with anti-interleukin (IL) 17 agents; hepatitisB virus reactivation with rituximab, anti-TNF, and JAKi; and herpes simplex and herpes zoster infections with JAKi (especially tofacitinib and upadacitinib at high doses). The incidence of infections with ustekinumab and anti-IL-23 was very low. Anti-IL-1, nemolizumab, tralokinumab, and omalizumab were not associated with an increased risk of infections. Dupilumab could decrease the incidence of cutaneous infections. Anti-TNF agents, rituximab, and JAKi (particularly tofacitinib) can increase the risk of infections. Close monitoring of patients undergoing these therapies is recommended. Prospective studies with long-term follow-up are needed to comparatively evaluate the risks of infection deriving from treatment with BD and JAKi.

Duration of Postvaccination Neutralizing Antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and Medication Effects: Results from the Safety and Immunogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccination in Systemic Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases Cohort Study.

In the face of the ongoing circulation of SARS-CoV-2, the durability of neutralization post-COVID-19 vaccination in immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) is a key issue, as are the effects of medications. Adults (n = 112) with inflammatory bowel disease, psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, spondylarthritis, and systemic lupus were recruited from participating Canadian medical centers from 2021 to 2023. We focused on log-transformed neutralization (lentivirus methods) as a continuous outcome, with separate models for wild-type and Omicron strains BA.1 and BA.5. Compared with 30 to 120 days postvaccination, subsequent periods were associated with greater neutralization in unadjusted models for wild-type, BA.1, and BA.5 strains and against the BA.1 strain in adjusted models. Rituximab was associated with lower neutralization for the BA.1 strain in adjusted models, with a similar trend for BA.5. In methotrexate users, there were trends for less neutralization of BA.1 and BA.5 in all unadjusted models, whereas in adjusted models, there was significantly lower neutralization only for the wild type. Three or more doses and Omicron-specific vaccines were both independently associated with better neutralization ability for all three strains. A COVID-19 infection within six months before sampling was associated with higher neutralization of wild type and BA.1 in adjusted analyses. Anti-tumor necrosis factor agents were associated with lower neutralization ability for BA.5 in adjusted analyses. Neutralization responses in immunosuppressed individuals with IMID were durable over time and were augmented by more than three doses and Omicron-specific vaccines. Less neutralization was seen with certain medications. Our work clarifies the joint effects of vaccine history, infection, and medications on COVID-19 immunity.