Anti-calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies Research Articles

Switching between anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A comparison of monthly and quarterly dosing

BackgroundAnti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRPmAbs) have dramatically changed preventive treatment options for patients with migraine. Although there is emerging real-world evidence on the use of CGRPmAbs globally, the change in efficacy and safety after switching between CGRPmAbs owing to patients' frequency of hospital visits preference remains unknown. MethodsWe conducted a single-centre, retrospective, real-world study of patients with migraine who first received galcanezumab for 3 or 4 months and then switched to fremanezumab at Keio University Hospital. We investigated changes in monthly migraine days (MMD), responder rate, and adverse effects such as injection site reactions. ResultsMMD increased only by 0.7 (95% CI, −4.1–5.5; p = 0.748) after 4 months of treatment with fremanezumab (6.1, 95% CI, 2.3–9.9) compared to before switching (5.4, 95% CI, 2.2–8.6). Furthermore, switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab produced only minor adverse events, such as injection site reactions. ConclusionsAfter switching from galcanezumab to fremanezumab out of the desire to visit the hospital less often, the reduction in MMD compared to baseline was sustained, and no serious adverse effects were observed.

Combined Prophylaxis of Chronic Migraine with OnabotulinumtoxinA and Anti-CGRP Antibodies

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of adding large molecule anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to onabotulinumtoxinA (OBT-A) for chronic migraine prevention. Background: Chronic migraine (CM) is a highly prevalent, debilitating disorder that leads to personal, social, and economic burdens. Both OBT-A and mAbs are proven safe and effective in chronic migraine prevention. The use of combination therapy has not been formally studied but may prove more effective than either monotherapy alone in select patients. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of patients with chronic migraine, treated with OBT-A, who received additional mAb preventative therapy. The primary endpoint was migraine headache days per month (MHD) after 3 months of combined therapy. Secondary endpoints included total headache days per month, headache intensity, disability level, and use of abortive medications. Results: Of 1503 patients reviewed, 133 met inclusion criteria. At 3 months of combined therapy, mean reduction of MHD from baseline was 6.2 (95% CI 4.91 to 7.49, p < 0.0001). Nearly 2/3rd of patients (60.9%) experienced ≥ 50% MHD reduction. Fewer patients reported high disability level (14.6% [17/126], compared to 29.4%) and high headache intensity (13.0% [16/119], compared to 51.3%) at 3 months (all p < 0.0001). A reduction in abortive medication doses needed and discontinuation of concomitant oral preventative medications was also noted in 15.8% and 6.8% of patients, respectively. Conclusions: Combined therapy with OBT-A and mAbs is well-tolerated, effective in further reducing migraine frequency, and may improve quality of life for patients with CM refractory to monotherapy.

Meta-regression to explain the placebo effects in clinical trials of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention

Background: Commonly used methods of comparison (e.g. network meta-analyses) require common comparator(s) across trials, such as placebo in placebo-controlled trials. Recent literature indicates that route of administration differences across placebo arms of clinical trials in pain disorders may contribute to differences in placebo effect.Methods: We conducted a meta-regression on placebo data from pivotal clinical trials of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies for migraine prevention to quantify the impact of route of administration, migraine type (episodic/chronic), and number of prior treatment failures on placebo reduction in monthly migraine days (MMDs) across weeks 1–12 of treatment. A systematic literature review of Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature conducted in June 2021 identified 14 relevant, randomized placebo-controlled trials for analysis.Results: After testing models with different covariates, a meta-regression was fitted to the extracted placebo data with the covariates of route of administration, migraine type, and proportion of patients with ≥2 prior preventive treatment failures. An intravenous route of administration for the placebo arm was a predictor for higher MMD reduction. Predictors of lower MMD reduction were migraine type (episodic migraine) and a higher proportion of patients having ≥2 failed preventive treatments.Conclusions: The efficacy of intravenous anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are likely underestimated, and differences in the route of administration of placebo may necessitate use of alternative methods that do not assume the presence of a common comparator when comparing anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine prevention. Further research into the contextual effects of the placebo effect is warranted.

Galcanezumab in patients with episodic migraine: results from the open-label period of the phase 3 PERSIST study

BackgroundThe phase 3 randomized PERSIST study demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of galcanezumab, a humanized anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody for prevention of episodic migraines. We present findings from the open-label extension (OLE) of PERSIST, which evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in patients from China, India, and Russia.MethodsPatients completing the 3-month double-blind period of PERSIST were eligible for the 3-month OLE. Patients previously randomized to galcanezumab (GMB/GMB group) continued to receive galcanezumab 120 mg at all three visits during the OLE whereas patients randomized to placebo received a 240 mg loading dose of galcanezumab and then two 120 mg doses (PBO/GMB group). The primary outcome was the mean change (from double-blind baseline) in the number of monthly migraine headache days (MHDs) to month 6. Other endpoints included percent reduction in monthly MHDs from double-blind baseline to month 6, functional outcomes, safety and tolerability.ResultsOverall, 99% of patients completing the double-blind period entered the OLE, and 96% completed through month 6. Patients in the GMB/GMB group achieved continued improvements in efficacy, with the reduction from baseline in the mean number of monthly MHDs, and slightly increasing from 4.01 days at the end of the double-blind period to 4.62 at the end of the OLE. Of patients who were ≥ 50% responders to galcanezumab at month 3, 66% maintained this response through to month 6. Patients in the PBO/GMB group experienced a rapid reduction in the number of monthly MHDs after initiation of galcanezumab, with a mean reduction from baseline of 4.56 days by month 6. The long-term benefits of galcanezumab were also supported by improvements in other efficacy and functional endpoints. All safety findings were consistent with the known long-term safety profile of galcanezumab; no patients experienced a treatment-related serious adverse event.ConclusionsGalcanezumab was efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with episodic migraine from China, India and Russia, for up to 6 months.Trial registrationClinicalTrisABSTRACT_pals.gov NCT03963232, registered May 24, 2019.

Persistence to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA among patients with migraine: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundTo date, real-world evidence on persistence to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) or onabotulinumtoxinA have excluded eptinezumab. This retrospective cohort study was performed to compare treatment persistency among patients with migraine on anti-CGRP mAbs (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, or eptinezumab) or onabotulinumtoxinA.MethodsThis retrospective study used IQVIA PharmMetrics data. Adult patients with migraine treated with an anti-CGRP mAb or onabotulinumtoxinA who had 12 months of continuous insurance enrollment before starting treatment were included. A “most recent treatment episode” analysis was used in which the most recent episode was defined as the latest treatment period with the same drug (anti-CGRP mAb or onabotulinumtoxinA) without a ≥ 15-day gap in medication supply on/after June 25, 2020, to December 31, 2021. Patients were indexed at the start of their most recent episode. Patients were considered non-persistent and discontinued the therapy associated with their most recent episode if there was ≥ 15-day gap in medication supply. A Cox proportional-hazards model estimated the discontinuation hazard between treatments. The gap periods and cohort definition were varied in sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe study included 66,576 patients (median age 46 years, 88.6% female). More eptinezumab-treated patients had chronic migraine (727/1074), ≥ 3 previous acute (323/1074) or preventive (333/1074) therapies, and more prior treatment episodes (3) than other treatment groups. Based on a 15-day treatment gap, patients on subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs had a 32% (95% CI: 1.19, 1.49; erenumab), 42% (95% CI: 1.27, 1.61; galcanezumab), and 58% (95% CI: 1.42, 1.80; fremanezumab) higher discontinuation hazard than those receiving eptinezumab, with this relationship attenuated, but still statistically significant based on 30-day and 60-day treatment gaps. There was no significant difference in the discontinuation hazard between eptinezumab and onabotulinumtoxinA. Based on a 15-day treatment gap among patients who newly initiated therapy, the discontinuation hazard of subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs remained significantly higher compared to eptinezumab and onabotulinumtoxinA.ConclusionPatients treated with eptinezumab demonstrated persistency that was higher than subcutaneous anti-CGRP mAbs and similar to onabotulinumtoxinA.Graphical

Impact of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies on migraine attack accompanying symptoms: A real-world evidence study.

Clinical trials on anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies poorly investigated their impact on migraine accompanying symptoms. To evaluate the impact of basal accompanying symptoms on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies treatment response and their evolution after six months of treatment in migraine patients. Patients with migraine diagnosis seen in the Headache Clinic and treated with erenumab, galcanezumab or fremanezumab were prospectively recruited. They completed a daily eDiary which provided data on headache frequency and the following accompanying symptoms of each day: photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, dizziness, and aura. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on 50% or greater reduction in headache days per month at month 6 (≥50% response rate). Accompanying symptoms ratios based on headache days per month were assessed per patient at baseline and after three and six months. Comparisons for basal characteristics, basal accompanying symptoms ratios and their evolution after six months between responders and non-responders were performed. One hundred and fifty-eight patients were included, 44% (69/158) showed ≥50% response rate after six months. A significant reduction in headache days per month in both groups was found at month 6 (-9.4 days/month in ≥50% response rate group; p < 0.001, -2.2 days/month in <50% response rate group; p = 0.004). Additionally, significant decreases in photophobia (-19.5%, p < 0.001), phonophobia (-12.1%, p = 0.010) and aura ratios (-25.1%, p = 0.008) were found in ≥50% response rate group. No statistically significant reductions were found in nausea and dizziness in any group since their reduction was correlated with the decrease in headache days per month. Higher photophobia ratios at baseline were predictive of an increased response between months 3 and 6 (Incidence Risk Ratio = 0.928, p = 0.040). The days per month with photophobia, phonophobia and aura decreased at a higher rate than headache days per month after six months in the ≥50% response group. Higher photophobia ratios were associated with higher response rates between three and six months. It could indicate an involvement of peripheral CGRP in photophobia as well as a central modulation of migraine through these treatments which mainly act on the periphery.

Treatment of hemiplegic migraine with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies: A case series in a tertiary-care headache center.

Hemiplegic migraine (HM) is a subtype of migraine with aura that includes motor weakness; such headaches can be excruciating. The presence of not only headache but also aura symptoms of HM increase the burden on patients, and the treatment of HM is sometimes challenging. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway are novel migraine preventive treatments that have shown promising efficacy in patients with migraine; however, there have been no reports regarding their efficacy in HM to date. Six patients with HM were treated with galcanezumab in a tertiary-care headache center. After 3 months of treatment, the number of monthly days with headache of at least moderate severity was reduced in three patients. The number of days each month with weakness was also reduced in four patients. Furthermore, the Patient's Global Impression of Change and change in Migraine Disability Assessment total score, were improved in five of the six patients after the treatment; however, the change from baseline in days with bothersome symptoms did not show any specific trends in our patients. Notably, no adverse events were reported during the treatments. The mechanism underlying the improvement in aura symptoms in our patients is not clear; however, we speculate that a small amount of CGRP mAbs have a direct mode of action in the central nervous system; alternatively, blocking the CGRP pathway in the periphery may secondarily inhibit cortical spreading depression. While prudence must be practiced, galcanezumab was still generally effective in HM and well tolerated. Further prospective clinical studies will more clearly elucidate the effects of CGRP mAbs in patients with HM.

Visual hypersensitivity in patients treated with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (receptor) monoclonal antibodies.

To evaluate the effect of treatment with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP; receptor) antibodies on visual hypersensitivity in patients with migraine. Increased visual sensitivity can be present both during and outside migraine attacks. CGRP has been demonstrated to play a key role in light-aversive behavior. In this prospective follow-up study, patients treated for migraine with erenumab (n = 105) or fremanezumab (n = 100) in the Leiden Headache Center were invited to complete a questionnaire on visual sensitivity (the Leiden Visual Sensitivity Scale [L-VISS]), pertaining to both their ictal and interictal state, before starting treatment (T0) and 3 months after treatment initiation (T1). Using a daily e-diary, treatment effectiveness was assessed in weeks 9-12 compared to a 4-week pre-treatment baseline period. L-VISS scores were compared between T0 and T1. Subsequently, the association between the reduction in L-VISS scores and the reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) was investigated. At 3 months, the visual hypersensitivity decreased, with a decrease in mean ± standard deviation (SD) ictal L-VISS (from 20.1 ± 7.7 to 19.2 ± 8.1, p = 0.042) and a decrease in mean ± SD interictal L-VISS (from 11.8 ± 6.6 to 11.1 ± 7.0, p = 0.050). We found a positive association between the reduction in MMD and the decrease in interictal L-VISS (β = 0.2, p = 0.010) and the reduction in ictal L-VISS (β = 0.3, p = 0.001). A decrease in visual hypersensitivity in patients with migraine after treatment with anti-CGRP (receptor) antibodies is positively associated with clinical response on migraine.

Preventive Treatment With Eptinezumab in Patients With a Dual Diagnosis of Chronic Migraine and Medication-Overuse Headache: Subgroup Analysis of PROMISE-2 (S47.006)

Preventive Treatment With Eptinezumab in Patients With a Dual Diagnosis of Chronic Migraine and Medication-Overuse Headache: Subgroup Analysis of PROMISE-2 (S47.006)

Early Clinical Experience With Eptinezumab From a Retrospective, Observational Study of Real-World Patient Response (P6-12.008)

<h3>Objective:</h3> To describe the patient response, including effects on disability and function, to eptinezumab in a real-world setting after 6 months of preventive migraine treatment. <h3>Background:</h3> The anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody eptinezumab is approved for the prevention of migraine in adults. Evidence from post-marketing studies is needed to better understand how eptinezumab prevents migraine in the real-world setting. <h3>Design/Methods:</h3> This retrospective chart review examined data from adults who initiated preventive treatment and received at least 2 infusions of eptinezumab (100mg or 300mg) at headache clinics between April and October 2020. Demographic information, treatment history, migraine and headache frequency, disease characteristics, and disability assessment scores (e.g., Migraine Disability Assessment [MIDAS], Headache Impact Test [HIT-6]) were collected using standardized case-report forms completed by physicians. These report forms measured patient and clinician perspectives on eptinezumab treatment response. <h3>Results:</h3> This analysis includes data from 31 patients with migraine (mean age, 50.7 years; 100% white [27/27]; 81.5% female [22/27]; 93.5% chronic migraine [29/31]) had been collected across 8 sites. Relative to baseline, 6 months of preventive treatment with eptinezumab reduced mean monthly headache days (23.5 at baseline, 16.3 at Month 6), mean monthly migraine days (17.9 at baseline, 9.1 at Month 6), and patient-reported disability (50.0% [11/22] severe at baseline per MIDAS and/or HIT-6, 36.8% [7/19] severe at Month 6). Eptinezumab treatment was also associated with reduced acute headache medication use (16.7 mean acute medication days per month in the last 3 months prior to treatment and 8.3 at Month 6). Clinicians reported that treatment was well-tolerated (96.8%) and improved disability/function (77.4%) after 6 months of use. <h3>Conclusions:</h3> Early clinical experience with eptinezumab and the magnitude of improvement is consistent with results reported in controlled clinical trials, with reductions in headache frequency and associated disability evident during the first 6 months of treatment. <b>Disclosure:</b> Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Amgen. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Axsome Therapeutics. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $5,000-$9,999 for serving as a Consultant for Lundbeck. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as a Consultant for Med-IQ. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Medscape. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Satsuma. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Neurolief. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Abbvie. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Everyday Health. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for Allergan. Dr. Starling has received personal compensation in the range of $500-$4,999 for serving as a Consultant for WebMD. Steven Kymes has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Lundbeck. Steven Kymes has received personal compensation in the range of $0-$499 for serving as an Editor, Associate Editor, or Editorial Advisory Board Member for American Journal of Ophthalmology. Steven Kymes has received research support from Emmes Corporation. Divya Asher has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Lundbeck. Divya Asher has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of AbbVie. Seema Soni-Brahmbhatt has nothing to disclose. Meghana Karnik-Henry has received personal compensation for serving as an employee of Lundbeck.

Responder Rates With Eptinezumab Over 24 Weeks in Patients With Prior Migraine Preventive Treatment Failures (S47.007)

Responder Rates With Eptinezumab Over 24 Weeks in Patients With Prior Migraine Preventive Treatment Failures (S47.007)

Medications affecting the insulin-like growth factor 1/growth hormone axis, including teprotumumab, somatostatin analogs, and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, are associated with elevated reporting odds of alopecia in women: A pharmacovigilance study

Medications affecting the insulin-like growth factor 1/growth hormone axis, including teprotumumab, somatostatin analogs, and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies, are associated with elevated reporting odds of alopecia in women: A pharmacovigilance study

Safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway and gepants in migraine prevention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Direct comparisons of the tolerability and safety of migraine preventive treatments targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway are lacking. This study aimed to compare the safety and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies and gepants in migraine prevention. A network meta-analysis of phase 3 randomized controlled trials assessing the safety and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, eptinezumab, fremanezumab, or galcanezumab) and gepants (atogepant, rimegepant) in migraine prevention was performed. Primary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included any adverse events, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation and individual adverse events. We included 19 randomized controlled trials, comprising 14,584 patients. Atogepant 120 mg (OR 2.22, 95% CI [1.26, 3.91]) and galcanezumab 240 mg (OR 1.63, 95% CI [1.33, 2.00]) showed the largest odds of treatment-emergent adverse events compared to placebo. While eptinezumab 30 mg had greater odds of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (OR 2.62, 95% CI [1.03,6.66]). No significant differences in serious adverse events were found between active treatments and placebo. Eptinezumab was associated with the lowest odds of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events compared to placebo, whereas erenumab was associated with the lowest odds of any adverse events and quarterly fremanezumab with the lowest odds of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway and gepants are a safe and well tolerated option for migraine prevention.

Switching OnabotulinumtoxinA to Monoclonal Anti-CGRP Antibodies in Drug-Resistant Chronic Migraine.

OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) and anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) are approved drugs for chronic migraine (CM), a difficult-to-treat condition. Optimization of CM patient management by choosing the best options and determining appropriate time for switching or adding concomitant treatments are highly needed. Evaluate clinical response to anti-CGRP mAbs in patients who switched from BTX-A due to ineffectiveness defined by different cut-offs and assess the retention rate, effectiveness, and safety of both drugs within the first 9 months of treatment. A monocentric, cohort study, enrolling patients withCM, resistant to several preventive treatments, first treated with BTX-A and then with anti-CGRP mAbs with two observational phases of 9 months preceded by respective baseline. First, the retention rate and effectiveness of both treatments were measured in all patients. A second analysis assessed effectiveness in patients stratified according to <50 or <30% response rate to BTX-A. The absolute change from baseline in monthly headache days (MHDs), response rate, analgesic use, and persistence in medication overuse (MO) at 3, 6, and 9 months of treatment were recorded. Last observation carried forward (LOCF)analyses, including all patients and assuming no further changes after discontinuation, were performed for all outcomes. Of the 78 enrolled patients (80.8% female, and 89.7% with MO at baseline), 32 (41.0%) received erenumab, 32 (41.0%) galcanezumab, and 14 (18.0%) fremanezumab. Retention rate was 62.2 and 91.0% for BTX-A and 76.9 and 96.2%, for anti-CGRP mAbs at 3 and 9 months of treatment, respectively. At 9 months of treatment, 22.4% of BTX-A patients and 65.0% of anti-CGRP mAbs patients achieved a ≥50% response rate. Anti-CGRP mAbs reduced MHDs, AMN, and AMDs, and decreased the number of MO patients at 9 months. In patients stratified according to <50 or <30% response rate to BTX-A, response rate (≥50% response at 9 months) to anti-CGRP was 62.9 and 57.9%, respectively. LOCF analyses confirmed these findings. No serious adverse events (AEs) were recorded and only two patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. Difficult-to-treat CM patients who discontinued BTX-A and received anti-CGRP mAbs showed a substantial clinical improvement in migraine-related outcomes. Switching to an anti-CGRP mAb appears to be a viable option in patients with insufficient response after the first 2 cycles with BTX-A. The appropriate variables, cut-offs, and timing to define ineffectiveness and the best time to switch or combine therapies for difficult-to-treat CM need to be investigated further.

Real-world evidence of galcanezumab for migraine treatment in Japan: a retrospective analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab in patients with migraine in a real-world setting in Japan.BackgroundGalcanezumab is the first anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody approved in Japan. To the best of our knowledge, no real-world studies on galcanezumab have been published in any international journal from Japan.MethodsWe retrospectively examined patients with migraine who received three doses of galcanezumab between August 2021 and February 2022 at the Keio University Hospital. We assessed changes in monthly migraine days, responder rate, and migraine-associated and premonitory symptoms. We also investigated injection site reactions and adverse events.ResultsFifty-two patients received three doses of galcanezumab during the study period. Compared with those at baseline, the monthly migraine days decreased by 5.9 days (95% confidence interval, 4.2–7.7) at 3 months. The 50% responder rate was 61.5% at 3 months. A total of 64.9%, 50.0%, and 63.9% of patients showed improvement in the severity of photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea/vomiting, respectively. Premonitory symptoms without subsequent headache were reported in 62.5% of patients. Moreover, injection site reaction was the most common adverse event (34.6%).ConclusionThis study revealed the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for migraineurs in Japan. Galcanezumab also improved migraine-associated symptoms. However, despite a reduction in headaches, premonitory symptoms without subsequent headache were reported in > 50% of the patients at 3 months.

OnabotulinumtoxinA Add-On to Monoclonal Anti-CGRP Antibodies in Treatment-Refractory Chronic Migraine.

We sought to assess the effectiveness of combining dual therapy with onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX) add-on to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP MAbs) in treatment-refractory patients with chronic migraine (CM). We retrospectively reviewed the medical files of 19 treatment-refractory patients with CM who had failed to two oral migraine preventatives, at least three consecutive BTX cycles (less than 30% response rate), at least three consecutive sessions with either fremanezumab or erenumab (less than 30% response rate), and were eventually switched to dual therapy with BTX add-on to any of the already-given anti-CGRP MAbs. We then assessed from baseline to each monotherapy or dual intervention predefined efficacy follow-up the changes in the following efficacy outcomes: (i) monthly headache days (MHD), (ii) monthly days with moderate/severe peak headache intensity, and (iii) monthly days with intake of any acute headache medication. Response (50% reduction in MHD) rates, safety, and tolerability were also determined. In the majority of cases (n = 14), dual targeting proved effective and was associated with clinically meaningful improvement in all efficacy variables; 50% response rates (also disability and QOL outcomes) coupled with favorable safety/tolerability. Our results advocate in favor of the view that dual therapy is effective and should be considered in difficult-to-treat CM patients who have failed all available monotherapies.

Inpatient Constipation Among Migraine Patients Prescribed Anti-calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies and Standard of Care Antiepileptic Drugs: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a United States Electronic Health Record Database.

Erenumab, an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor monoclonal antibody (mAb), was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2018. Constipation with serious complications was added to the Warning and Precautions section in the erenumab Prescribing Information in October 2019 after events were observed during post-marketing surveillance. We aimed to assess and compare the risk of inpatient constipation, and, separately, inpatient constipation with serious complications, among patients with migraine treated with CGRP mAbs and standard of care antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Within Optum's Electronic Health Record Research Database, patients with migraine who initiated erenumab, other CGRP mAbs, and AEDs were identified from May 2018 through March 2020. Erenumab initiators were propensity score-matched separately to initiators of other CGRP mAbs and AEDs. Incident inpatient constipation events, and serious complications, were identified using multiple risk windows for outcome assessment (30-, 60-, 90-day risk windows, and all available follow-up). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated comparing inpatient constipation risk among matched erenumab initiators relative to comparators. We identified 17,902 erenumab, 13,404 other CGRP mAb, and 49,497 AED initiators who met study criteria. Among matched initiators, the risk of inpatient constipation was 0.46% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.60) for erenumab and 0.44% (95%CI 0.33-0.58) for other CGRP mAbs within the 90-day risk window, with a corresponding OR of 1.06 (95%CI 0.72-1.55). Among matched erenumab and AED initiators, inpatient constipation risk was 0.53% (95%CI 0.42-0.66) and 0.76% (95%CI 0.62-0.92), respectively, and the OR was 0.69 (95%CI 0.51-0.94). Few serious complications were observed. Patients initiating erenumab had similar risk of inpatient constipation within 90days of treatment initiation versus patients initiating other CGRP mAbs, and lower risk versus patients initiating AEDs. These findings provide context to events observed during post-marketing surveillance.

Efficacy of Fremanezumab In Resistant and Refractory Chronic Migraine Patients: Real-World Data from The Hull Migraine Clinic, Uk

Background Fremanezumab is an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody efficacious for chronic migraine prophylaxis. We evaluated real-world prophylactic efficacy of fremanezumab for refractory and resistant chronic migraine in a United Kingdom specialist headache centre (Hull Migraine Clinic). Materials and Methods 289 adult patients with resistant and refractory chronic migraine commenced fremanezumab with prospective follow-up, maintaining headache diaries for ≥1-month pre-fremanezumab initiation and continuously thereafter. Patients failed 6 median previous prophylactics. We measured monthly headache days, migraine days, headache-free days, analgesia medication days, triptan days and Headache Impact Test-6 scores at baseline and during treatment. Results All outcomes significantly improved in results of 182 patients at 4-month follow-up (p&lt;0.0001), with reduced median monthly headache days (by 9 days), migraine days (by 10 days) and Headache Impact Test-6 (by 14.5 points). 80% patients achieved ≥30% migraine reduction, whilst 68% and 42% patients achieved &gt;50% and &gt;75% reduction. 58%, 39% and 17% patients achieved ≥30%, &gt;50% and &gt;75% headache day reduction. OnabotulinumtoxinA-unresponsive patients exhibited substantial responses, with 78%, 66% and 39% patients achieving ≥30%, &gt;50% and &gt;75% migraine reduction. Medication-overuse did not affect responses. 45% patients achieved &lt;15 headache days in any month, and 65% achieved &lt;8 migraine days in any month. 37% achieved both outcomes. In multivariate analyses, baseline headache-freedom and lower Headache Impact Test-6 score associated with ≥30% migraine reduction (p&lt;0.05), whilst baseline headache-freedom and lower migraine-days associated with achieving &lt;15 headache days in any month (p&lt;0.01). Conclusion Fremanezumab demonstrates real-world efficacy at 4 months in resistant and refractorychronic migraine, including in OnabotulinumtoxinA-unresponsive patients, irrespective of medication-overuse. Baseline headache-freedom, lower migrainedays and lower Headache Impact Test-6 score heralded superior responses.

Migraine With Comorbid Depression: Pathogenesis, Clinical Implications, and Treatment.

Migraine is a neurological disorder that strongly relates to psychiatric conditions like depression. Lately, the increased prevalence of depression in migraineurs has come to attention. This article compiled various literature to explore the association between migraine and depression. Genetic overlap of various gene segments was studied, and heritability patterns were explored. Shared mechanisms such as serotonergic dysfunction, methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms, and hormonal effects were investigated, and commonalities like comorbidities, stress, and environmental factors were analyzed. Migraine with comorbid depression (MID) affects various aspects of life and its clinical impact on migraine disability, quality of life (QOL), progression, and medication overuse was investigated. We further inspected several types of research in order to provide options on various treatment modalities. Pharmacotherapy such as antidepressants and anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies like fremanezumab were studied. Alternative treatment options such as onabotulinumtoxinA (OBTA) injections, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), and vagal nerve stimulations (VNS) were also appraised and the efficacies of each were compared.

Rapid resolution of migraine symptoms after initiating the preventive treatment eptinezumab during a migraine attack: results from the randomized RELIEF trial

BackgroundEptinezumab is an anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibody approved for the preventive treatment of migraine. In the phase 3 RELIEF study, eptinezumab resulted in shorter time to headache pain freedom and time to absence of most bothersome symptom (MBS; including nausea, photophobia, or phonophobia) compared with placebo when administered during a migraine attack. The objective of this exploratory analysis was to examine the earliest time points that eptinezumab separated from placebo (P < .05) on headache- and migraine-associated symptoms when administered during a migraine attack.MethodsRELIEF, a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind trial, occurred from November 7, 2019, through July 8, 2020. Adults considered candidates for preventive treatment were randomized to eptinezumab 100 mg (N = 238) or placebo (N = 242) administered intravenously over 30 min within 1–6 h of migraine onset. Outcome measures included headache pain freedom/relief and absence of MBS, patient’s choice of photophobia, phonophobia, or nausea, at regular intervals from 0.5 to 48 h after infusion start. Censoring was applied at time of acute rescue medication use.ResultsAt hour 1, more eptinezumab-treated patients achieved headache pain freedom (9.7%), headache pain relief (38.7%), and absence of MBS (33.2%) versus placebo (4.1%, 26.9%, and 22.1%, respectively; P < .05 all), with separation from placebo (P < .05) through hour 48. Eptinezumab separated from placebo (P < .05) at hour 1 in absence-of-photophobia (29.4% vs 17.0%) and absence-of-phonophobia (41.2% vs 27.2%) and through hour 48. Initial separation from placebo (P < .05) in absence-of-nausea occurred at end-of-infusion (0.5 h; 36.7% vs 25.4%, respectively).ConclusionPreventive treatment with eptinezumab initiated during a migraine attack resulted in more patients achieving headache pain freedom/relief and absence of MBS, with separation from placebo (P < .05) as early as 0.5–1 h following the start of infusion. Rapid resolution of headache- and migraine-associated symptoms by a peripherally acting, intravenously administered antibody suggest a peripheral site of pharmacological action for CGRP blockade.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04152083.