Anteroposterior Ground Reaction Force Research Articles

Toe Box Shape of Running Shoes Affects In-Shoe Foot Displacement and Deformation: A Randomized Crossover Study.

Long-distance running is popular but associated with a high risk of injuries, particularly toe-related injuries. Limited research has focused on preventive measures, prompting exploration into the efficacy of raised toe box running shoes. This study aimed to investigate the effect of running shoes with raised toe boxes on preventing toe injuries caused by distance running. A randomized crossover design involved 25 male marathon runners (height: 1.70 ± 0.02 m, weight: 62.6 + 4.5 kg) wearing both raised toe box (extended by 8 mm along the vertical axis and 3 mm along the sagittal axis) and regular toe box running shoes. Ground reaction force (GRF), in-shoe displacement, and degree of toe deformation (based on the distance change between the toe and the metatarsal head) were collected. Wearing raised toe box shoes resulted in a significant reduction in vertical (p = 0.001) and antero-posterior (p = 0.015) ground reaction forces during the loading phase, with a notable increase in vertical ground reaction force during the toe-off phase (p < 0.001). In-shoe displacement showed significant decreased movement in the forefoot medial (p < 0.001) and rearfoot (medial: p < 0.001, lateral: p < 0.001) and significant increased displacement in the midfoot (medial: p = 0.002, lateral: p < 0.001). Impact severity on the hallux significantly decreased (p < 0.001), while impact on the small toes showed no significant reduction (p = 0.067). Raised toe box running shoes offer an effective means of reducing toe injuries caused by long-distance running.

The Combined Influence of Infant Carrying Method and Motherhood on Gait Mechanics.

Postpartum mothers are susceptible to lumbopelvic pain which may be exacerbated by loading, like carrying their infant in arms and with baby carriers. Nulliparous women carrying infant mannequins may biomechanically mimic mother-infant dyad, but this has not been studied. The purpose of our study was to investigate biomechanical differences of 10 mothers carrying their infants and 10 nulliparous women carrying infant mannequins under 3 gait conditions: carrying nothing, carrying in arms, and carrying in a baby carrier (babywearing). Spatiotemporal gait parameters, peak ground reaction forces and impulses, and lower extremity and trunk kinematics were collected using motion capture and force plates and compared using a mixed 2 × 3 (parity × condition) analysis of variance (α ≤ .05). The largest differences occurred between carrying conditions: carrying in arms or babywearing increased vertical and anteroposterior ground reaction forces, trunk extension, ankle dorsiflexion, and hip and knee flexion. Kinematic differences were identified between arms and babywearing conditions. Together this suggests alterations in joint loading for both groups. Our study also contributes a novel understanding of postpartum health by demonstrating alterations in step time, anterior forces, and ankle and knee mechanics, suggesting that during gait, mothers carrying their own infants choose different propulsive strategies than nulliparous women carrying mannequins.

Validity of spatiotemporal and ground reaction force estimates during resisted sprinting with a motorized loading device.

We aimed to examine the validity of estimating spatiotemporal and ground reaction force (GRF) parameters during resisted sprinting using a robotic loading device (1080 Sprint). Twelve male athletes (age: 20.9 ± 2.2 years; height: 174.6 ± 4.2 cm; weight: 69.4 ± 6.1 kg; means ± SDs) performed maximal resisted sprinting with three different loads using the device. The step frequency and length and step-averaged velocity, anteroposterior GRF (Fap ), and the ratio of Fap to resultant GRF (RF) were estimated using the velocity and towing force data measured using the device. Simultaneously, the corresponding values were measured using a 50-m force plate system. The proportional and fixed biases of the estimated values against those measured using the force plate system were determined using ordinary least product (OLP) regression analysis. Proportional and fixed biases were observed for most variables. However, the proportional bias was small or negligible except for the step frequency. Conversely, the fixed bias was small for step-averaged velocity (0.11 m/s) and step length (0.04 m), whereas it was large for step frequency (0.54 step/s), Fap (16N), and RF (2.22%). For all variables except step frequency, the prediction intervals in the OLP regression dramatically decreased when the corresponding values were smoothed using a two-step moving average. These results indicate that by using the velocity and force data recorded in the loading device, most of the spatiotemporal and GRF variables during resisted sprinting can be estimated with some correction of the fixed bias and data smoothing using the two-step moving average.

Influence of horizontal resistance loads on spatiotemporal and ground reaction force variables during maximal sprint acceleration

This study aimed to elucidate the influence of horizontal resistance loads on the spatiotemporal and ground reaction force (GRF) variables during maximal sprint acceleration. Nine male sprinters (20.2 ± 1.2 years; 175.3 ± 4.5 cm, 69.7 ± 6.1 kg) performed sprint-running with six loading conditions of one unresisted and five resisted loads of 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 kg using a resistance training device with intelligent drag technology. During the trials, the GRFs for all steps were determined using a 50-m force plate system. The spatiotemporal and GRF variables at running velocity of every 0.5 m/s were obtained and compared across the loading conditions. The maximal running velocity under 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 kg loading conditions were 9.84 ± 0.41, 8.55 ± 0.41, 8.09 ± 0.33, 7.62 ± 0.34, 7.11 ± 0.31, and 6.71 ± 0.29 m/s, respectively. ANOVA revealed significant main effects of load on the measured variables (η2 = 0.236–0.715, p &lt; 0.05), except for stance-averaged anteroposterior GRF and braking impulse. However, the observed differences between the loading conditions were small, with approximately 4% (1.3–7.5%) for the GRF variables and approximately 9% (1.2–22.3%) for the spatiotemporal variables. The present study indicates that horizontal resistance load in sprint acceleration has little impact on the spatiotemporal and GRF variables at a given running velocity. In contrast to a general recommendation, one should adopt a heavy load in resisted sprint aiming to improve performance in the earlier stage of maximal sprint acceleration.

Prediction of gait kinetics using Markerless-driven musculoskeletal modeling

Video-based motion analysis systems are emerging in the biomechanics research community, yet there is limited exploration of kinetics prediction using RGB-markerless kinematics and musculoskeletal modeling. This project aimed to provide ground reaction force (GRF) and ground reaction moment (GRM) predictions during over-ground gait by introducing RGB-markerless kinematics into a musculoskeletal modeling framework. Full-body markerless kinematic inputs and musculoskeletal modeling were used to obtain GRF and GRM predictions which were compared to measured force plate values. The markerless-driven predictions yielded average root mean-squared error (RMSE) in the stance phase of 0.035 ± 0.009 N∙BW−1, 0.070 ± 0.014 N∙BW−1, and 0.155 ± 0.041 N∙BW−1 in the mediolateral (ML), anteroposterior (AP), and vertical (V) GRFs. This was accompanied by moderate to high correlations and interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) indicating moderate to good agreement between measured and predicted values (95% Confidence Inervals: ML = [0.479, 0.717], AP = [0.714, 0.856], V = [0.803, 0.905]). For ground reaction moments (GRM), average RMSE was 0.029 ± 0.013 Nm∙BWH-1, 0.014 ± 0.005 Nm∙BWH-1, and 0.005 ± 0.002 Nm∙BWH-1 in the sagittal, frontal, and transverse planes. Pearson correlations and ICCs indicated poor agreement between systems for GRMs (95% Confidence Intervals: Sagittal = [0.314, 0.608], Frontal = [0.006, 0.373], Transverse = [0.269, 0.570]). Currently, RMSE is larger than target thresholds set from studies using Kinect, inertial, or marker-based kinematic drivers; but methodological considerations highlighted in this work may help guide follow-up iterations. At this point, further use in research or clinical practice is cautioned until methodological considerations are addressed, although results are promising at this point.

Mechanical Asymmetries during Treadmill Running: Effects of Running Velocity and Hypoxic Exposure

Studies evaluating mechanical asymmetry across a range of running velocities during treadmill runs have yielded inconsistent findings, while the impact of additional hypoxic exposure has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to characterize the effects of manipulating running velocity and hypoxic exposure on gait asymmetry during treadmill running. Eleven trained individuals performed seven runs at different velocities (8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20 km·h−1) in a randomized order, each lasting 45 s. The running took place on an instrumented treadmill for normoxia (FiO2 = 20.9%), moderate hypoxia (FiO2 = 16.1%), high hypoxia (FiO2 = 14.1%), and severe hypoxia (FiO2 = 13.0%). Vertical and antero-posterior ground reaction force recordings over 20 consecutive steps (i.e., after running ∼25 s) allowed the measurement of running mechanics. Lower-limb asymmetry was assessed from the ‘symmetry angle’ (SA) score. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (seven velocities × four conditions) was used. There was no significant difference in SA scores for any of the biomechanical variables for velocity (except contact time and braking phase duration; p = 0.003 and p = 0.002, respectively), condition, or interaction. Mean SA scores varied between ∼1% and 2% for contact time (1.5 ± 0.8%), flight time (1.6 ± 0.6%), step length (0.8 ± 0.2%), peak vertical force (1.2 ± 0.5%), and mean vertical loading rate (2.1 ± 1.0%). Mean SA scores ranged from ∼2% to 5% for duration of braking (1.6 ± 0.7%) and push-off phases (1.9 ± 0.6%), as well as peak braking (5.0 ± 1.9%) and push-off forces (4.8 ± 1.7%). In conclusion, the trained runners exhibited relatively even strides, with mechanical asymmetries remaining low-to-moderate across a range of submaximal, constant running velocities (ranging from 8 to 20 km·h−1) and varying levels of hypoxia severity (between normoxia and severe hypoxia).

The Relationship between Ground Reaction Forces, Foot Positions and Type of Clubs Used in Golf: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Despite the growing interest in golf, the impact of motion control strategy on golf performance may be uncertain. A network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the relationships between ground reaction force (GRF), foot positions, and club types in golf and determine whether different clubs have a different impact when swinging. Methods: Three databases were searched from the time of inception to March 2023. Eligibility criteria included studies that provided data using a driver to swing and compared outcomes to control data. Results: Searches yielded 6527 studies. Seven studies met the selection criteria (n = 422 participants). The results showed that an iron 6 is the best when considering the trail foot vertical ground reaction force (TVGRF), trail foot anteroposterior ground reaction force (TAGRF), and lead foot vertical ground reaction force (LVGRF). The pitching wedge was the best in the lead foot mediolateral ground reaction force (LMGRF) and lead foot anteroposterior ground reaction force (LAGRF). Iron 7 was the best in the trail foot mediolateral ground reaction force (TMGRF), and the lead foot was larger than the trail foot to the vertical GRF. Discussion: The study found that clubs may influence a player’s posture and swing power because golf clubs are available in various lengths and shapes. The lead foot generates a larger GRF than the trail foot; three-dimensional GRFs differ among golf clubs. When a golfer aims to maximize the distance of their drives, they must generate relatively more resultant horizontal reaction force (RFH). Golfers often use different clubs to achieve optimal performance on the course by controlling their motion. However, there needs to be a focus on the quality of the included studies because the sample size was too small, increasing the risk of bias associated with the results.

Ground reaction force and electromyograms of lower limb muscles during fast walking.

Physically active status is an important contributor to individual health. Walking is regarded as commonly accepted exercise for exercise promotion. Particularly, interval fast walking (FW), consisting of alternating between fast and slow walking speeds, has gained popularity from practical viewpoints. Although previous studies have determined the short- and long-term effects of FW programs on endurance capacity and cardiovascular variables, factors affecting these outcomes have not been clarified. In addition to physiological variables, understanding of mechanical variables and muscle activity during FW would be a help to understand characteristics of FW. In the present study, we compared the ground reaction force (GRF) and lower limb muscle activity between fast walking (FW) and running at equivalent speeds. Eight healthy men performed slow walking (45% of the maximum walking speed; SW, 3.9 ± 0.2 km/h), FW (85% of the maximum walking speed, 7.4 ± 0.4 km/h), and running at equivalent speeds (Run) for 4 min each. GRF and average muscle activity (aEMG) were evaluated during the contact, braking, and propulsive phases. Muscle activities were determined for seven lower limb muscles: gluteus maximus (GM), biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), gastrocnemius medialis (MG), soleus (SOL), and tibialis anterior (TA). The anteroposterior GRF was greater in FW than in Run during the propulsive phase (p < 0.001), whereas the impact load (peak and average vertical GRF) was lower in FW than in Run (p < 0.001). In the braking phase, lower leg muscle aEMGs were higher during Run than during SW and FW (p < 0.001). However, in the propulsive phase, soleus muscle activity was greater during FW than during Run (p < 0.001). aEMG of tibialis anterior was higher during FW than during SW and Run in the contact phase (p < 0.001). No significant difference between FW and Run was observed for HR and RPE. These results suggest that the average muscle activities of lower limbs (e.g., gluteus maximus, rectus femoris, and soleus) during the contact phase were comparable between FW and running, however, the activity patterns of lower limb muscles differed between FW and running, even at equivalent speeds. During running, muscles were mainly activated in the braking phase related to impact. In contrast, during FW, soleus muscle activity during the propulsive phase was increased. Although cardiopulmonary response was not different between FW and running, exercise using FW might be useful for health promotion among individuals who cannot exercise at high-intensity.

Ground reaction forces during double limb stances while walking in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation.

The asymmetrical gait of individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation has been well documented. However, there is not a wealth of investigation into asymmetries during the double limb stance depending on whether the intact or prosthetic limb is leading. The first aim of this study was to compare ground reaction forces during the double limb stance of individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation depending on whether their intact (initial double limb stance) or prosthetic (terminal double limb stance) limb was leading. The second aim of this study was to compare the asymmetry ratio of ground reaction forces during the double limb stance between individuals with and without unilateral transfemoral amputation. Thirty individuals, fifteen with unilateral transfemoral amputation and fifteen who were able-bodied, were recruited for this study. Each individual walked on an instrumented treadmill for 30s at eight different speeds, ranging from 2.0km/h to 5.5km/h with .5km/h increments. Ground reaction force parameters, temporal parameters, and asymmetry ratios of all parameters were computed from the data collected. The appropriate statistical analyses of all data based on normality were conducted to investigate the aims of this study. Significant main effects of speed, double limb stance, and their interactions were found for most parameters (p < .01 or p < .05). Individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation spent a longer duration in terminal double limb stance than initial double limb stance at all tested speeds. They also experienced significantly higher peak vertical ground reaction force during initial double limb stance compared to terminal double limb stance with increasing walking speed. However, during terminal double limb stance, higher anteroposterior ground reaction force at initial contact was found when compared to initial double limb stance. Significant differences between individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation and able-bodied individuals were found in asymmetry ratios for peak vertical ground reaction force, anteroposterior ground reaction force, anteroposterior shear, and mediolateral shear at all tested speeds. Asymmetrical loading persists in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation during double limb stance. Increasing walking speed increased ground reaction force loading asymmetries, which may make individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation more susceptible to knee osteoarthritis or other musculoskeletal disorders. Further study is necessary to develop ideal gait strategies for the minimization of gait asymmetry in individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation.

Effect of the Innovative Running Shoes With the Special Midsole Structure on the Female Runners’ Lower Limb Biomechanics

The study aimed to research the effects of innovative running shoes (a high heel-to-toe drop and special structure of midsole) on the biomechanics of the lower limbs and perceptual sensitivity in female runners. Fifteen healthy female runners were recruited to run through a 145-m runway with planted force plates at one peculiar speed (3.6 m/s ± 5%) with two kinds of shoe conditions (innovative running shoes vs. normal running shoes) while getting biomechanical data. The perception of shoe characteristics was assessed simultaneously through a 15-cm visual analog scale. The statistical parametric mapping technique calculated the time-series parameters. Regarding 0D parameters, the ankle dorsiflexion angle of innovative running shoes at touchdown was higher, and the peak dorsiflexion angle, range of motion, peak dorsiflexion velocity, and plantarflexion moment on the metatarsophalangeal joint of innovative running shoes during running were significantly smaller than those of normal running shoes (all p < 0.001). In addition, the braking phase and the time of peak vertical force 1 of innovative running shoes were found to be longer than those of normal running shoes (both p < 0.05). Meanwhile, the average vertical loading rate 1, peak vertical loading rate 1, peak braking force, and peak vertical force 1 in the innovative running shoes were lower than those of the normal running shoes during running (both p < 0.01). The statistical parametric mapping analysis exhibited a higher ankle dorsiflexion angle (0–4%, p < 0.05), a smaller knee internal rotation angle (0–6%, p < 0.05) (63–72%, p < 0.05), a decreased vertical ground reaction force (11–17%, p = 0.009), and braking anteroposterior ground reaction force (22–27%, p = 0.043) for innovative running shoes than normal running shoes. Runners were able to perceive the cushioning of innovative running shoes was better than that of normal running shoes. These findings suggested combining the high offset and structure of the midsole would benefit the industrial utilization of shoe producers in light of reducing the risk of running injuries for female runners.

Kinetic and kinematic changes during resisted sprinting due to towing three common parachute sizes.

Different sized parachutes may alter applied resistance during parachute towing (PT), changing results of resisted sprint training interventions. Thus, it was hypothesized that there may be significant net anteroposterior ground reaction force and impulse differences due to parachute size towed. Fifteen male sprinters completed control and PT sprints over a 50 m force platform system. Estimated aerodynamic drag, ground reaction forces and kinematic differences during the maximum speed phase were compared between control (no parachute) and PT trials with small (0.39 m2), medium (0.54 m2) and large (0.72 m2) parachutes, using One-way ANOVA (significance set at P<0.050) with Tukey's HSD post-hoc (critical Q value = 3.746) tests. No significant (P>0.050) step length, step frequency, propulsive mean force, vertical mean force, or vertical impulse differences between trials. There was a significant anteroposterior impulse difference (P<0.001, Q=4.574) between small and medium PT, but no differences between medium and large PT. Compared to the control trial, all PT trials increased anteroposterior net mean force (P<0.001), anteroposterior net impulse (P<0.001), and propulsive impulse (P<0.001). However, only PT with the large parachute significantly reduced running speed (P<0.050, Q=3.792), braking mean force (P<0.050, Q=4.130) and braking impulse (P<0.001, Q=5.987), compared to the control trial. A large parachute may be most effective for PT (compared to control trial) to overload the body during the maximum speed phase in a single session.

Ground reaction force and joint moment estimation during gait using an Azure Kinect-driven musculoskeletal modeling approach

BackgroundGait analysis is burdened by time and equipment costs, interpretation, and accessibility of three-dimensional motion analysis systems. Evidence suggests growing adoption of gait testing in the shift toward evidence-based medicine. Further developments addressing these barriers will aid its efficacy in clinical practice. Previous research aiming to develop gait analysis systems for kinetics estimation using the Kinect V2 have provided promising results yet modified approaches using the latest hardware may further aid kinetics estimation accuracy Research questionCan a single Azure Kinect sensor combined with a musculoskeletal modeling approach provide kinetics estimations during gait similar to those obtained from marker-based systems with embedded force platforms? MethodsTen subjects were recruited to perform three walking trials at their normal speed. Trials were recorded using an eight-camera optoelectronic system with two embedded force plates and a single Azure Kinect sensor. Marker and depth data were both used to drive a musculoskeletal model using the AnyBody Modeling System. Predicted kinetics from the Azure Kinect-driven model, including ground reaction force (GRF) and joint moments, were compared to measured values using root meansquared error (RMSE), normalized RMSE, Pearson correlation, concordance correlation, and statistical parametric mapping ResultsHigh to very high correlations were observed for anteroposterior GRF (ρ = 0.889), vertical GRF (ρ = 0.940), and sagittal hip (ρ = 0.805) and ankle (ρ = 0.876) moments. RMSEs were 1.2 ± 2.2 (%BW), 3.2 ± 5.7 (%BW), 0.7 ± 0.1.3 (%BWH), and 0.6 ± 1.0 (%BWH) SignificanceThe proposed approach using the Azure Kinect provided higher accuracy compared to previous studies using the Kinect V2 potentially due to improved foot tracking by the Azure Kinect. Future studies should seek to optimize ground contact parameters and focus on regions of error between predicted and measured kinetics highlighted currently for further improvements in kinetic estimations.

Methodological Considerations in Assessing Interlimb Coordination on Poststroke Gait: A Scoping Review of Biomechanical Approaches and Outcomes.

Objective: To identify and summarize biomechanical assessment approaches in interlimb coordination on poststroke gait. Introduction: Interlimb coordination involves complex neurophysiological mechanisms that can be expressed through the biomechanical output. The deepening of this concept would have a significant contribution in gait rehabilitation in patients with an asymmetric neurological impairment as poststroke adults. Inclusion criteria: Poststroke adults (>19 years old), with assessment of interlimb coordination during gait, in an open context, according to the Population, Concept, Context framework. Methods: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science™, Scopus, and gray literature in Google Scholar™, according to the PRISMA-ScR recommendations. Studies written in Portuguese or English language and published between database inception and 14 November 2021 were included. Qualitative studies, conference proceedings, letters, and editorials were excluded. The main conceptual categories were “author/year”, “study design”, “participant’s characteristics”, “walking conditions”, “instruments” and “outcomes”. Results: The search identified 827 potentially relevant studies, with a remaining seven fulfilling the established criteria. Interlimb coordination was assessed during walking in treadmill (n = 3), overground (n = 3) and both (n = 1). The instruments used monitored electromyography (n = 2), kinetics (n = 2), and kinematics (n = 4) to assess spatiotemporal parameters (n = 4), joint kinematics (n = 2), anteroposterior ground reaction forces (n = 2), and electromyography root mean square (n = 2) outcomes. These outcomes were mostly used to analyze symmetry indices or ratios, to calculate propulsive impulse and external mechanical power produced on the CoM, as well as antagonist coactivation. Conclusions: Assessment of interlimb coordination during gait is important for consideration of natural auto-selected overground walking, using kinematic, kinetic, and EMG instruments. These allow for the collection of the main biomechanical outcomes that could contribute to improve better knowledge of interlimb coordination assessment in poststroke patients.

Increasing Step Rate Affects Rearfoot Kinematics and Ground Reaction Forces during Running.

Simple SummaryExcessive movements, or inadequate timing in movement patterns, during running may contribute to the development of some running-related injuries. Specifically, excessive movement at the rearfoot, influencing lower leg rotation, has been a focus on different running-related injuries. One method to change how the lower limbs move is to increase step rate, or cadence. There is little research available describing how the rearfoot is affected by changes in step rate; therefore, the primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing step rate on rearfoot motion during running. Reflective markers were placed on twenty runners’ lower legs and feet in order to capture leg and foot movements while running on a treadmill at the runners’ preferred speed and step rate. Step rate was increased by 5% and 10%, while runners were cued by a metronome. Three-dimensional rearfoot motion was calculated during the stance phase (foot in contact with the ground) of running. The main finding of this study was that increasing step rate decreased peak rearfoot and lower leg rotation. These findings may be useful for rehabilitation for some running-related injuries.Relatively high frontal and transverse plane motion in the lower limbs during running have been thought to play a role in the development of some running-related injuries (RRIs). Increasing step rate has been shown to significantly alter lower limb kinematics and kinetics during running. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing step rate on rearfoot kinematics, and to confirm how ground reaction forces (GRFs) are adjusted with increased step rate. Twenty runners ran on a force instrumented treadmill while marker position data were collected under three conditions. Participants ran at their preferred pace and step rate, then +5% and +10% of their preferred step rate while being cued by a metronome for three minutes each. Sagittal and frontal plane angles for the rearfoot segment, tibial rotation, and GRFs were calculated during the stance phase of running. Significant decreases were observed in sagittal and frontal plane rearfoot angles, tibial rotation, vertical GRF, and anteroposterior GRF with increased step rate compared with the preferred step rate. Increasing step rate significantly decreased peak sagittal and frontal plane rearfoot and tibial rotation angles. These findings may have implications for some RRIs and gait retraining.

Effects of walking speed on magnitude and symmetry of ground reaction forces in individuals with transfemoral prosthesis

Individuals with unilateral transfemoral amputation (uTFA) walk asymmetrically. Investigating gait symmetry in ground reaction force (GRF) is critical because asymmetric loading on the residual limb can result in injury. The aim of this study was to investigate the GRF of individuals with uTFA by systematically controlling their walking at eight speeds(2.0–5.5 km/h with increments of 0.5 km/h) on a treadmill. Forty-eight individuals participated in this study, which included 24 individuals with uTFA (K3 and K4) and 24 individuals without amputation. GRFs (anteroposterior, mediolateral, and vertical) of the prosthetic and intact limb steps were collected for the individuals with uTFA and those of the right limb were collected for the control group. Peak force values of the GRF components, temporal parameters, impulses, and their asymmetry ratios were investigated and statistically analyzed. With an increasing walking speed, the magnitude of GRF changed gradually; individuals with uTFA exhibited increased GRF asymmetry in the vertical and mediolateral components, while that of the anteroposterior component remained constant. uTFA individuals typically maintained a constant asymmetry ratio in the mediolateral and anteroposterior (braking and propulsive) GRF impulses across a wide range of walking speeds. This result suggests that individuals with uTFA may cope with various walking speeds by maintaining symmetric mediolateral and anteroposterior impulses. The data provided in this study can serve as normative data for the GRF and its symmetry across a range of walking speeds in individuals with uTFA.

The Long-Term Wearing of Foot Orthoses Can Change the Frequency Domain of Ground Reaction Forces in Children with Flexible Flat Feet

ABSTRACT Introduction Analyzing the frequency content of ground reaction forces (GRFs) might be helpful when assessing gait abnormalities in children with flexible flatfeet. The aims of this study were therefore to evaluate 1) differences in GRF frequency content between children with and without flatfeet; and 2) whether the long-term wearing of foot orthoses changes the GRF frequency contents in children with flatfeet. Materials and Methods This is a pre-post study design. GRFs were collected at baseline for boys both with and without flatfeet. Boys with flatfeet wore custom-made foot orthoses with unique shoes for 4 months; GRFs were collected for the flatfeet group after 4 months too. Data were collected while participants wore shoes without foot orthoses in the pretest and shoes with foot orthoses in the posttest. GRFs were collected during walking by two Kistler force platforms (each force plate was used for each leg). Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) test and a separate 2 (side: dominant vs. nondominant) × 2 (time: pretest vs. posttest) ANOVA with repeated measures were used for statistical analysis. Results The flatfeet group indicated lower vertical GRF frequency (P = 0.003; d = 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.12–7.59) and greater vertical amplitude of harmonic 16 for the nondominant limb (P = 0.030; d = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.0001–0.0022) than the normal feet group. No significant differences in GRF frequency content were found for the dominant limb between pretest and posttest (P &gt; 0.05; d = 0.01–039). However, for nondominant limb, vertical GRF frequency content (P &lt; 0.001; d = 0.85; 95% CI, 6.21–7.36) was diminished at posttest compared with pretest. In the nondominant limb, the anteroposterior GRF frequency with a power of 99.5% showed a significant increase at posttest compared with pretest (P = 0.025; d = 0.50; 95% CI, 13.30–16.20). For both limbs, amplitudes of three-dimensional GRF components were lower at posttest than at pretest (P &lt; 0.05; d = 0.0.14–1.20; 95% CI, −0.0005 to −0.0083). Conclusions The results indicated lower GRF frequency content and amplitudes after long-term wearing of foot orthoses. Therefore, long-term wearing of foot orthoses may be applied to obtain functional improvements in children with flatfeet. Clinical Relevance Clinicians are advised to apply foot orthoses to improve functions in children with flatfeet.

Differences in Muscle Activity and Kinetics Between the Goblet Squat and Landmine Squat in Men and Women.

Collins, KS, Klawitter, LA, Waldera, RW, Mahoney, SJ, and Christensen, BK. Differences in muscle activity and kinetics between the goblet squat and landmine squat in men and women. J Strength Cond Res 35(10): 2661-2668, 2021-Squat exercise variations are widely used and extensively researched. However, little information exists on the goblet squat (GBS) and landmine squat (LMS) and differences between men and women. This study investigated the differences in muscle activity and kinetics between the GBS and the LMS in 16 men and 16 women. Five repetitions of each squat type were performed loaded at 30% of their body mass. Vertical and anteroposterior ground reaction forces for the eccentric and concentric phases and peak vertical force were recorded with a force plate. Electromyographic (EMG) signals were recorded for the vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), semitendinosus (ST), and biceps femoris (BF). Normalized mean EMG values and ground reaction forces were analyzed with repeated measures analysis of variance (p < 0.05). Significant main effects for squat condition and sex were found. The LMS reduced activity in the quadriceps (VM and VL) muscles and vertical forces, while increasing posterior horizontal forces. In the LMS, men showed decreased ST activity, whereas women had decreased BF activity. Women exhibited greater quadriceps activity in both the GBS and LMS and greater ST in the LMS. Women also produced greater eccentric vertical force in both the GBS and LMS and less posterior horizontal forces in the LMS. The LMS may be useful to balance hamstring to quadriceps activity, increase horizontal loading, and reduce vertical loading. Conversely, the GBS can better target quadriceps activity and increase vertical loading. Sex differences should be considered for training programs that include the GBS and LMS.

Catapult start likely improves sprint start performance

Sprint technical training, named the catapult start, is defined as partner assisted pulling of the hip backward at the set position and during block clearance, released by the forward motion of the athlete. This study investigated the characteristics of the catapult start and its influence on the following sprint start performance. Fourteen male sprinters performed a single 15-m control, catapult, and post-catapult sprint starts, during which ground reaction forces (GRFs) were measured using force platforms. All measured GRF variables during the block clearance, except for the impulses and mean forces on the front block and ratio of force for the rear block, were greater in the catapult start than the control (effect size [ES]=0.52–2.09). Waveform analyses revealed that the rear block anteroposterior GRF was greater for the catapult start than the control during the initial, middle and final phases (0 to 20%, 40 to 61% and 95 to 100%) of block clearance, while the rear block ratio of force was greater for the catapult start until 13% of block clearance. The catapult start resulted in greater rear block ratio of force (ES = 0.28), faster 10-m sprint time (ES = 0.31) and greater average horizontal external power during the initial 10-m (ES = 0.25) at the post-catapult trial. The results suggest that the catapult start can be accompanied with greater force production mainly for the rear block regardless of direction during the block clearance, and it can improve post-catapult sprint start performance in terms of the rear block ratio of force and 10-m sprint time.

Investigating the effect of innovative storing-restoring hybrid passive ankle-foot orthosis on braking and propulsion impulse of walking in drop-foot patients: a prospective cohort study

Background: Drop foot is a disorder that is characterized by reduction in speed and the patients’ inability to propel the paretic side, which disrupts the walking patterns. Ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) are widely prescribed in these patients in order to facilitate their leg propulsion and foot clearance during the swing phase. The purpose of this study was to use the correlation between effect of innovative AFO on braking and propulsion impulse and speed, in order to interpret the innovative AFO’s influence on the paretic and nonparetic side in drop-foot patients. Methods: Ten participants with drop foot walked at their self-selected speed, in order to collect the kinetic and kinematic data. The anteroposterior ground reaction force (GRF) components were extracted from the decomposition method with an innovative storing-restoring hybrid passive AFO and compared with baseline shoes only for both paretic and nonparetic sides. Results: There is a strong correlation between the innovative AFO speed and the anteroposterior component of GRF. After that, correlation was found between anteroposterior GRF and the storing-restoring hybrid passive AFO in comparison with baseline shoes only in both the paretic and nonparetic sides. Conclusions: This study demonstrated a strong correlation during walking between speed and the propulsion and braking impulses of the anteroposterior component of GRF on both sides. Level of Evidence: Level II.

Barefoot walking changed relative timing during the support phase but not ground reaction forces in children when compared to different footwear conditions

BackgroundThere is a paucity of available biomechanical kinetic data comparing shod and barefoot conditions in children. Research questionDo children wearing footwear have comparable gait velocity, ground reaction forces (GRF), spatiotemporal parameters, propulsive and braking impulses when compared to children walking barefoot? MethodsSeventy-five children were divided into four groups: Group 1 females aged 4–9 years old (n = 29). Group 2 females aged 3–5 years old (n = 16). Group 3 males aged 6–9 years old (n = 13). Group 4 males aged 4–8 years old (n = 17). Children walked at a self-selected pace over a walkway of force platforms. Each footwear and barefoot represented a separate condition. The order of conditions was randomized. A repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to investigate the effects of the footwear type on gait parameters in each group. Multiple comparisons with Bonferroni corrections were conducted when appropriate. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in velocity or in vertical and anteroposterior GRF across conditions for all groups. There was a significant effect of the footwear worn on time to loading response peak (p = 0.008), time to midstance force (p = 0.006), and time to propulsive peak (p < 0.001). For Group 3, there was a significant effect of the footwear worn on time to braking peak (p < 0.001) and time to propulsive peak (p < 0.001). Regarding impulses for Group 1, there was a significant effect of the footwear worn on the loading response impulse (p = 0.016) and terminal stance and pre-swing impulse (p = 0.001). For Group 4, there was a significant effect of the footwear worn on the loading response impulse (p = 0.028). SignificanceThere is no influence of the evaluated children’s footwear on gait velocity or GRF.