Anterolateral Portal Research Articles

Radiographic and Dynamic Assessment for Resection of Cam Lesions in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement

Cam-type femoroacetabular impingement is characterized by a pathologic asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction, and arthroscopic femoral osteoplasty is indicated to correct the bony abnormality and restore normal hip mechanics when symptomatic. Residual femoroacetabular impingement deformity after arthroscopy is a leading cause of failure, and it is therefore critical to perform a thorough fluoroscopic and dynamic assessment when addressing cam deformities arthroscopically. The fluoroscopic assessment uses 6 anteroposterior views, including 3 in hip extension (30°internal rotation, neutral rotation, and 30° external rotation) and 3 in 50° flexion (neutral rotation, 40° external rotation, 60° of external rotation), performed before, during, and after the femoral resection. The dynamic assessment includes evaluation of impingement-free range of motion and "end feel" (a subjective description of the tactile feedback during assessment of hip motion), and should be performed before and after the femoral resection in 3 specific positions (extension/abduction, flexion/abduction, and flexion/internal rotation). Although the anterior aspect of the head-neck junction is readily accessed through standard arthroscopic portals with the hip in 30 to 50° of flexion, the posterolateral, posteromedial, and posterior extent of the femoral head-neck junction are challenging to address. The natural external rotation of the proximal femur during flexion and internal rotation during extension can be used to gain posterior lateral and medial access. Antero/posteromedial femoral access can be obtained with >50° of hip flexion with the burr in the anteromedial portal. Posterolateral femoral access is achieved with hip extension with the burr in the anterolateral portal, and further posterolateral access can be achieved with the addition of traction, allowing resection of posterolateral deformities extending beyond the lateral retinacular vessels while remaining proximal to the vessels. This comprehensive intraoperative fluoroscopic and dynamic assessment and surgical technique can lead to a predictable correction of most cam-type deformities.

Portal Selection for Suture Anchor Placement During Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair: A Study Based on 3-Dimensional Model Reconstruction.

Arthroscopic suture repair is the main treatment option for hip labral tears; however, anchor insertion and placement from arthroscopic portals is difficult. To quantitatively evaluate the safety of various arthroscopic portals for suture anchor placement during hip labral repair. Descriptive laboratory study. The computed tomography scans of 20 patients with normally developed hip joints were used to create 3-dimensional models. The distances from the anchor to the articular cartilage (DAC) and from the acetabular insertion point to the cortical bone (DCB) were measured in the anterolateral portal (AL), posterolateral portal (PL), midanterior portal (MAP), medial MAP, and 3 distal anterolateral accessory portals (DALAs): DALA-proximal, DALA-middle, and DALA-distal. Labral tears were divided into anterior (4, 3, and 2 o'clock), lateral (1, 12, and 11 o'clock), and posterior (10, 9, and 8 o'clock) acetabular zones, and the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare DAC and DCB in the zones. The success rate was defined as anchors placed with DAC ≥1 mm and DCB ≥15 mm. The DAC was significantly smaller in the AL at 1 o'clock (0.68 ± 0.32 mm; P < .001) and 12 o'clock (0.37 ± 0.30 mm; P < .001), and in the PL at 12 o'clock (-0.35 ± 0.38 mm; P < .001) and 11 o'clock (0.60 ± 0.24 mm; P < .001). The DCB was significantly smaller in the DALA-P at 3 o'clock (8.93 ± 2.12 mm; P < .001) and 11 o'clock (9.59 ± 2.84 mm; P < .001), the MAP at 12 o'clock (13.76 ± 3.89 mm; P < .001) and 11 o'clock (0.27 ± 0.27 mm; P < .001), and the MMA at 12 o'clock (5.96 ± 2.31 mm; P < .001) and 11 o'clock (0 mm; P < .001). Success rates were high for MAP and MMA between 4 o'clock and 1 o'clock, for DALA-proximal at 12 o'clock, for AL at 11 o'clock, and for PL between 10 o'clock and 8-o'clock. There were significant differences in the success rate of anchor placement using different portals during hip arthroscopic labral repair. MAP is recommended for labral repair between 4 o'clock and 1 o'clock, DALA-P is recommended between 2 o'clock and 12 o'clock, AL is suitable at 11 o'clock, and PL is suitable between 10 o'clock and 8 o'clock.

Poster 265: The Risk of Iatrogenic Posterior Neurovascular Injury in Lateral Meniscal Repair Based on Real Arthroscopic Position: An MRI Study

Objectives: Posterior horn of lateral meniscal repair using an all-inside meniscal repair device involves a risk of iatrogenic posterior neurovascular injury. Some studies have evaluating the injury risk in this area but most were based on preoperative MRIs and landmarks which are difficult to clearly see under actual arthroscopic surgery. To our knowledge, there have been no studies to date evaluating the risk of injury based on MRIs with the knee in the standard operational figure-of-4 position with joint dilatation in arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair related to the lateral border of the lateral meniscal root which is easy to identify during surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the risk of posterior neurovascular injury and establish the safe and danger zones in repairing the lateral meniscus through the anterolateral and anteromedial portals in relation to the medial and lateral borders of the lateral meniscal root (LMR) using standard operational figure-of-4 position with joint dilatation MRIs. Methods: This study was descriptive laboratory study. Using 29 axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of knees in the figure-of-4 position with joint fluid dilatation at the level of the lateral meniscus, direct lines were drawn to simulate a straight all-inside meniscal repair device deployed from the anteromedial and anterolateral portals to the medial and lateral borders of the LMR extending 14 mm beyond the joint capsule. If the line passed through or touched the posterior neurovascular structure, a risk of iatrogenic injury was noted, and measurements were made to determine the safe zones in relation to the medial or lateral border of the LMR. Results: Repairing the lateral meniscus through the anterolateral portal in relation to the lateral border of the LMR had a significantly greater risk of posterior neurovascular injury than repairing through the anteromedial portal, of which the incidences were 68.97% and 10.35%, respectively (p-value = 0.001). The “safe zones” of lateral meniscal repair in relation to the lateral border of the LMR through the anterolateral and anteromedial portals were 4.15 ± 1.87 mm and 6.57 ± 0.98 mm lateral to the lateral border of the LMR, respectively. Conclusions: Our study found a risk of iatrogenic posterior neurovascular injury when repairing the posterior lateral meniscus tissue through both the anterolateral and anteromedial portals in relation to both the lateral and medial borders of the LMR, with repairs through the anterolateral portal having greater risk than through the anteromedial portal. To reduce this risk, the surgeon can use the “safe zones” as described in this study to decrease the potential risk of iatrogenic posterior neurovascular injury during arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair. Clinical Relevance: Iatrogenic injury is always a concern in any surgery, and the results of this study can be a guide to reducing iatrogenic posterior neurovascular injury during posterior horn of lateral meniscal repair.

Accuracy of Femoral Tunnel Placement between Anteromedial and Anterolateral Visualisation Portals in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - Outcomes of a CT based Cross-Sectional Study.

Anatomical femoral tunnel placement is critical for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Tunnel placement may vary with different surgical techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement between the Anteromedial (AM) and Anterolateral (AL) visualisation portals on post-operative CT scans among a cohort of ACLR patients. This cross-sectional study was conducted from January 2018 to March 2020 after obtaining ethics clearance. Patients who went for arthroscopic ACLR in our institute were divided into an AM (group 1) and an AL (group 2) based on the visualisation portal for creating the femoral tunnel and a 3D CT scan was done. The femoral tunnel position was calculated in deep to shallow and high to low direction using the Bernard Hertel grid. Femoral tunnel angle was measured in the 2D coronal image. Statistical analysis was done with the data collected. Fifty patients with an average age of 26.36 (18-55) years ±7.216 SD were enrolled in the study. In this study, the AM technique was significantly more accurate (p<0.01) than the AL technique in terms of femoral tunnel angle. Furthermore, the deep to the shallow position was significantly (p= 0.018) closer to normative values, as determined by the chi-square test. The chances of error in tunnel angle in femoral condyle are 2.6 times greater in the AL technique (minimal clinical difference). To conclude, in ACLR the anteromedial visualisation portal can facilitate accurate femoral tunnel placement compared to the anterolateral visualisation portal.

Arthroscopic Meniscus Ramp Repair: The Shoelace Technique

Background: A “ramp lesion” is described as an injury involving the peripheral attachment of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. Ramp lesions are associated with increased loads on anterior cruciate ligament and leads to rotatory instability of knee. During anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, failure to identify and treat ramp lesion leads to increased forces on the reconstructed graft and residual instability which ultimately increases chances for graft failure. It is important to identify the ramp lesions by looking at the posterior compartment and repair ramp lesion. Ramp lesions are still a challenge to treat due to misdiagnosis and long learning curve of current techniques. In this technique, we are presenting margin convergence shoelace technique to repair a large ramp lesion. Indications: Isolated ramp lesions or ramp lesions associated with other ligamentous injuries. Technique Description: Through standard anteromedial and anterolateral portals, diagnostic arthroscopy is done. Using Gillquist maneuver, posteromedial compartment is visualized to look for ramp lesion. Probing is done with 18-gauge spinal needle from posteromedial aspect of knee to look for hidden lesions and extent of tear. We use 2 additional portals, low and high posteromedial portals for ramp repair. Visualizing from anterolateral portal entry is made in the posteromedial compartment; low posteromedial portal is created at the level of meniscus; 8-mm passport cannula is inserted and used as working portal; and then, high posteromedial portal is created and used as viewing portal. Visualizing through high posteromedial portal rasping of ramp lesion is done. Now with knee scorpion loaded with 2-0 fiber wire, bites are taken along posterior margin of meniscus and capsular portion of tear edges alternatively in shoelace manner from lateral to medial. Finally, compression and knot tying are done and secured with multiple half hitches. Results: Surgical repair of ramp lesions is associated with good healing, and it restores stability of knee. Follow-up of more than 2 years shows better functional outcome and reduced retear rates. Discussion/Conclusion: Currently, there are a lot of techniques described for ramp repair. We present arthroscopic ramp repair with dual posteromedial portals by shoelace technique, which is a safe, easy, and cost-effective method and gives excellent results and good healing especially in larger tears. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Decision Making in Combined Hip Arthroscopy and Femoral Derotational Osteotomy Surgeries

Background: Femoral version abnormalities can contribute to intra-articular hip pathology. Combined hip arthroscopy with femoral derotational osteotomy (FDRO) has been shown to successfully treat those with intra-articular hip pathology with excessive anteversion or retroversion of the femur. Indications: We describe the technique for combined hip arthroscopy and FDRO in patients with symptomatic intra-articular hip pathology in the setting of excessive anteversion or retroversion of the femur. Technique Description: Hip arthroscopy is performed using standard anterolateral, modified mid-anterior, and distal anterolateral accessory portals. The labrum is repaired using a narrow diameter suture. Femoroplasty is performed with utilization of fluoroscopic imaging to assess resection. Dynamic flexion is performed as a final check of adequacy of resection. Capsular closure is performed in all cases. After hip arthroscopy, the patient is repositioned on a radiolucent table. A piriformis start point is obtained with a guide pin followed by standard opening reaming and ball-tipped guidewire placement. A femoral osteotomy is made just proximal to the isthmus and made through a lateral approach to the femur. Two K-wires are placed distal and proximal to the osteotomy site. A goniometer is then used to measure rotation. A drill is used to perforate the cortex circumferentially at the osteotomy site. After standard reaming, a sagittal saw is then used to start the osteotomy cut followed by an osteotome. An intramedullary nail is inserted over a ball-tipped guidewire while rotational reduction is assessed from the foot of the operating table. Distal interlocking screws are placed, and the nail is backslapped to create compression at the osteotomy site prior to placing proximal interlocking screws. Results: Recent studies show improved hip outcome scores in patients who undergo concomitant hip arthroscopy and FDRO for symptomatic abnormal femoral version. Discussion/Conclusion: Identifying patients who would benefit from concomitant surgeries requires thorough preoperative evaluation. Correct identification and treatment of these patients leads to improved outcomes. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

The Superficial Peroneal Nerve Is at Risk during the "All Inside" Arthroscopic Broström Procedure: A Cadaveric Study.

Background: The arthroscopic Broström procedure is a promising treatment for chronic ankle instability. However, little is known regarding the location of the intermediate superficial peroneal nerve at the level of the inferior extensor retinaculum; knowledge about this location is important for procedural safety. The purpose of this cadaveric study was to clarify the anatomical relationship between the intermediate superficial peroneal nerve and the sural nerve at the level of the inferior extensor retinaculum. Methods: Eleven dissections of cadaveric lower extremities were performed. The origin of the experimental three-dimensional axis was defined as the location of the anterolateral portal during ankle arthroscopy. The distances from the standard anterolateral portal to the inferior extensor retinaculum, sural nerve, and intermediate superficial peroneal nerve were measured using an electronic digital caliper. The location of inferior extensor retinaculum, the tract of sural nerve, and intermediate superficial peroneal nerve were checked using average and standard deviations. For the statistical analyses, data are presented as average ± standard deviation, and then they are reported as means and standard deviations. Fisher's exact test was used to identify statistically significant differences. Results: At the level of the inferior extensor retinaculum, the mean distances from the anterolateral portal to the proximal and distal intermediate superficial peroneal nerve were 15.9 ± 4.1 (range, 11.3-23.0) mm and 30.1 ± 5.5 (range, 20.8-37.9) mm, respectively. The mean distances from the anterolateral portal to the proximal and distal sural nerve were 47.6 ± 5.7 (range, 37.4-57.2) mm and 47.2 ± 4.1 (range, 41.0-51.8) mm), respectively. Conclusions: During the arthroscopic Broström procedure, the intermediate superficial peroneal nerve may be damaged by the anterolateral portal; the proximal and distal parts of the intermediate superficial peroneal nerve were located within 15.9 and 30.1 mm, respectively, at the level of the inferior extensor retinaculum in cadavers. These areas should be considered danger zones during the arthroscopic Broström procedure.

Diagnosis by Manual Maneuver of Medial Meniscus Ramp Lesions

The intra-articular injury most often associated with a chronic anterior cruciate ligament tear involves the posterior horn of the medial meniscus. A specific type of medial meniscal injury, called a ramp lesion, has received greater attention for identification and treatment because of its considerable incidence and diagnostic difficulty. Based on their location, these lesions may be arthroscopically “hidden” during traditional anterior visualization. The purpose of the present Technical Note is to describe the Recife maneuver. This maneuver diagnoses injuries to the posterior horn of the medial meniscus using additional arthroscopic management through a standard portal. The Recife maneuver is performed with the patient in the supine position. A 30° arthroscope is inserted through the anterolateral portal, and the posteromedial compartment is accessed according to the transnotch view (modified Gillquist view). In the proposed maneuver, with the knee in 30° of flexion, a valgus stress with internal rotation is performed, followed by palpation of the popliteal region and digital pressure on the joint interline. This maneuver allows a greater visualization of the posterior compartment, allowing the diagnostic evaluation of the integrity between the meniscus and the capsule, in a safer way, being able to identify ramp tears without the need to create a posteromedial portal. We recommend that the addition of the diagnostic visualization step of the posteromedial compartment as described by the Recife maneuver be performed to assess the meniscal status in routine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Labral Pull-Through Technique for Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip

Background: The goal of hip labral reconstruction is to restore the suction seal, requiring the labral graft to be precisely secured along the acetabular rim. When performed arthroscopically, controlling the graft as it is suspended in the hip joint between 2 cannulas can be challenging, making fixation in the optimal position to restore the suction seal difficult to achieve. Indications: Labral reconstruction/augmentation is indicated for patients with a deficient/dysfunctional labrum when repair alone cannot restore/maintain the suction seal. Technique Description: Following diagnostic arthroscopy, debridement, and measurement of the labral deficiency (30 mm), 70 mm tibialis anterior allograft was tubularized with a whipstitch and prepared with long suture tails at both ends and a single mattress stitch placed through the graft at the medial end. Holes for the anchors were pre-drilled. Viewing from the anterolateral portal, the graft was introduced down a sled through the modified anterior portal, pulled through the joint, and guided into the posterolateral portal cannula via instrumentation through the distal anterolateral accessory portal. With initial fixation achieved medially with the mattress stitch, directing the graft into position while achieving optimal coverage of the deficient area was facilitated by the excess graft length pulled into the posterolateral portal cannula. Results: Labral reconstruction can restore the suction seal of the hip joint when repair alone is not sufficient. Comparative studies with matched repair cohorts have demonstrated comparable survivorship and patient-reported outcomes between groups, with similar rates of patient acceptable symptomatic state and minimal clinically important difference between groups, and similar rates of return to sport in high-level athletes. Recent systematic reviews have largely corroborated these findings. Discussion/Conclusions: Arthroscopic labral reconstruction is an effective treatment option when repair alone cannot restore the suction seal when the graft is secured in an optimal position, but controlling the graft during passage and fixation while achieving a final length spanning the segmental deficiency in continuity with native tissue at both ends can present technical challenges. The labral pull-through technique greatly facilitates this process. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Chronic AC Joint Separation

Background: Management of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations depends on the type, chronicity of injury, and patient demographics. Indications: Coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction may be indicated for patients with chronic type 3 ACJ separation who have failed conservative treatment. We describe an arthroscopic-assisted approach to facilitate graft passage around the coracoid. Technique: Patients are placed in a beach chair position. A longitudinal incision at the midline of the distal clavicle is utilized for access to the ACJ, the distal clavicle, and the coracoid. The anterior, posterior, and undersurface of the distal clavicle are exposed. A standard posterior viewing and anterolateral working portals are created. A shuttling suture is passed arthroscopically and used to pass allograft and nonbiologic augmentation around the coracoid. The nonbiologic sutures are passed through a singular hole in the distal clavicle and secured with a DogBone button. The allograft is wrapped around the clavicle to recreate the coracoclavicular ligaments and secured with sutures. The ACJ capsule is reconstructed by suturing the posterior/medial limb, which is kept long, to the capsule and periosteum. Meticulous, layered closure is performed with particular attention to closing the deltotrapezial fascia. Results: A postoperative x-ray at 2 weeks and 6 months are obtained to confirm proper positioning. The sling is discontinued at 6 weeks, and supervised physical therapy is initiated. At 6 months, patients are typically cleared to full unrestricted activity. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic-assisted coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction in patients with chronic type 3 ACJ separation who fail conservative management can have excellent outcomes. The use of arthroscopic assistance may ease the passage of graft and nonbiologic suture around the coracoid. A 70° scope is helpful for coracoid visualization, and biologic reconstruction of the ligament with tendon graft with suture augmentation in chronic cases is vital in achieving a good outcome. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

All-Inside Repair of Complex Posterior Horn Meniscus Tears

Background: Due to difficult-to-access location and complex tear patterns, the management of meniscus injuries in isolation and in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament injury may be challenging. The aim of this video is to present techniques and tips that may help surgeons perform arthroscopic all-inside repair of complex meniscus tears. Indications: Indications for the presented repair techniques are young patients with high activity demands, symptomatic lateral and medial meniscus lesions, ligamentous knee instability, chondral changes grade 2 or less, neutral joint alignment, and body mass index below 35 kg/m2. Technique Description: High anterolateral, low anteromedial, and accessory anterolateral portals are used for the arthroscopic assessment of meniscus tear quality and pattern, and to ensure adequate access to the lesion. Horizontal mattress, vertical mattress, and cerclage sutures are passed using a range of all-inside devices to approximate tear edges with the aim of restoring native hoop stresses along the circumferential meniscus collagen fibers. Tear edges are abraded to enhance healing potential. Two separate cases and complex tear configurations are presented to illustrate these all-inside meniscus repair techniques. Results: Meniscus repair yields superior long-term outcomes compared with partial meniscectomy. Improvements in subjective knee function and lower rates of progression to long-term knee osteoarthritis are reported in patients treated with meniscus repair versus resection. Advantages of all-inside meniscus repair include the reduced risk of iatrogenic neurovascular lesions, decreased operative time, restoration of native contact surfaces, and repair without fixation of the menisci to the surrounding soft tissue. Discussion/Conclusion: Arthroscopic all-inside meniscus repair enables the safe and efficient management of complex meniscus tears in active patients with symptomatic meniscus pathology, and can be performed concurrent with knee ligament surgery. Consequently, all-inside meniscus repair techniques are a versatile addition to the toolkit of complex knee surgeons. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Arthroscopic debridement of the extensor carpi radialis brevis

Surgical treatment of lateral epicondylitis is reserved for patients who, despite extensive conservative therapy, do not experience satisfactory relief of symptoms. As an alternative to the open procedure, arthroscopic debridement of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB) muscle is asimple and standardized procedure. The arthroscopic approach also enables the additional treatment of intra-articular pathologies such as loose bodies or osteochondral lesions. After diagnostic arthroscopy, the attachment of the ECRB is visualized via the anteromedial portal, so that under visual control the debridement of the tendon fibers of the ECRB and its bony insertion site can be performed via the anterolateral portal. Postoperatively, there is no restriction of movement of the elbow joint. The outcome after arthroscopic ECRB debridement described in the literature is equivalent to that of other surgical techniques.

Comparative study between platelet-rich plasma intraarticular injection versus hyaluronic acid in knee osteoarthritis

Background Osteoarthritis (OA) is a major public health problem that causes pain and disability in one-third of all affected patients. It primarily affects the elderly populations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraarticular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) in knee OA. Patients and methods This was a prospective study that included 40 adult patients with knee OA grades II and III, where 20 patients were treated with PRP intraarticular injection two injections 1 month apart (group A), and 20 patients were treated with HA injections generally administered as a weekly injection for 3 weeks (group B). Data were collected from January 2017 till February 2018. In group A, the age of patients ranged from 45.0 to 67.0 years; five (25%) patients were males and 15 (75%) patients were females; unilateral side was affected in four (20%) patients, and bilateral side was affected in 16 (80%) patients; and grade II OA cases were 12 patients, and grade III OA cases were seven (40%) patients. In group B, the age of patients ranged from 49 to 75 years; five (25%) patients were males and 15 (75%) patients were females; unilateral side was affected in eight (40%) patients, and bilateral side was affected in 12 (60%) patients; and grade II OA cases were 11 (55%) patients, and grade III OA patients were nine (45%) patients. The procedure was done on an outpatient basis and under complete aseptic technique. PRP or HA was injected intraarticularly through an anterolateral or anteromedial portal. Follow-up with the patients was for at least 6 months, and the results of treatment were assessed by the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Results At the end of the follow-up period, which was 6 months, the KOOS in group A had improved to a mean score of 64.89 ± 17.97 points, as compared with the pre-injection score, which was 49.95 ± 14.21 points. In group B, at end of follow-up, the period score was 58.60 ± 19.10 points and the pre-injection score was 49.39 ± 19.97 points. Conclusion Both PRP and HA injections show significant improvement in grades II and III OA. The KOOS symptom subscale showed that PRP injections were more effective than HA injections in patients with grade II arthritis.

Distraction Gap Needed for Safe Central Compartment Access in Hip Arthroscopy

Background: Sufficient distraction of the hip is the key to a safe central compartment (CC) approach in hip arthroscopy. However, an adequate distraction gap has not been scientifically identified. Purpose: To determine the sufficient amount of distraction that could predict a successful CC access as well as to identify the risk factors for a failed or difficult CC access. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All patients who underwent hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon between January 2018 and April 2019 were prospectively enrolled. We analyzed gaps of the hip on 4 C-arm fluoroscopic images: nondistraction, preoperative manual traction, preoperative maximal traction (without distension), and intraoperative maximal traction (at the end of CC procedures in a successful CC approach or after peripheral compartment procedures in a failed or difficult CC approach). A failed CC approach was defined as failure in introducing the anterolateral portal to the CC under arthroscopic control; a difficult CC approach was defined as the presence of an incomplete diagnostic round in the CC because of a small distraction. The amount of distraction was evaluated by the ratio of the distracted gap to the undistracted gap. Patients were classified into the successful CC access group (group 1) and the failed/difficult CC access group (group 2). The amount of distraction, demographic characteristics, and preoperative radiographic parameters were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 240 patients were included in this study. Group 1 consisted of 205 patients (113 males and 92 females; mean ± SD age, 34.5 ± 11.4 years), and group 2 consisted of 35 patients (27 males and 8 females; age, 32.5 ± 11.2 years). The preoperative joint space width was not significantly different between group 1 (mean ± SD, 3.89 ± 0.83 mm) and group 2 (3.68 ± 0.68 mm). The ratio of the amount of distraction at lateral gaps under all traction conditions was significantly greater in group 1 compared with group 2 (1.50 ± 0.54 vs 1.26 ± 0.35, respectively, under preoperative manual traction; 2.84 ± 0.76 vs 2.03 ± 0.63 under preoperative maximal traction; 3.36 ± 0.96 vs 2.50 ± 0.79 under intraoperative maximal traction). An increase of the lateral gap by >2.2 times (P < .001) under preoperative maximal traction and by >2.7 times (P < .001) under intraoperative maximal traction could predict successful CC access. Male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; P = .017) and increased lateral center-edge angle (OR, 1.08 for every 1° increase; P = .004) were significant risk factors for failed/difficult CC access. Conclusion: An increase of the lateral gap by >2.2 times during an unsterile traction test without joint distension could predict successful CC access. Male sex and increased lateral center-edge angle were risk factors for a failed or difficult CC access.

Proximal Anterolateral Accessory Portal Use Improves Peripheral Compartment Access and Capsular Management with T-Capsulotomy

One of the primary goals of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is precise removal of pathologic FAI morphology while protecting and restoring the normal soft tissue anatomy. Adequate visualization is a key foundation of precise removal of FAI morphology and varying types of capsulotomies are frequently used to achieve necessary exposure. Anatomic and outcomes studies have influenced an increasing appreciation for repairing these capsulotomies. Thus one of the central technical challenges of hip arthroscopy is achieving both goals of capsule preservation and adequate visualization. Various techniques have been described, including suture-based capsule suspension, portal placement, and T-capsulotomy. The following technique describes how the proximal anterolateral accessory portal can be added to a capsule suspension and T-capsulotomy technique to improve visualization and facilitate repair.

A Novel Technique of Arthroscopic Femoral Tunnel Placement during Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation.

Recurrent patellar dislocation is a commonly encountered patellofemoral disease. Prompt surgical intervention is indicated for recurrent dislocation to restore patellofemoral stability. As one of the most preferred procedures, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been implemented on a large scale. Femoral tunnel placement remains a crucial technical issue during MPFL reconstruction and is critical to ensure the isometry and proper tension of the graft. Currently, visual-palpatory anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopy-guided radiographic landmarks comprise the main approaches to intraoperative femoral tunnel positioning. However, the accuracy of both methods has been questioned. This article introduces an arthroscopic femoral tunnel placement technique. Apart from traditional anteromedial and anterolateral portals, two auxiliary arthroscopic portals are specially designed. The adductor tubercle, the medial epicondyle and the posterior edge are selected as main anatomic landmarks and are directly visualized in sequence under arthroscope. The relative position between the femoral attachment of the MPFL and the three landmarks is measured on preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography, providing semi-quantified reference for intraoperative localization. This technique achieves minimally invasive tunnel placement without X-ray exposure, and especially suits obese patients for whom palpatory methods are difficult to perform.

Arthroscopic Fixation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Avulsion Fracture with Combined Suture Tape and Internal Bracing by Suture-bridge Technique

Background: Tibial-sided avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) almost always require surgical intervention. Multiple techniques of reduction and fixation have been described in the literature from open/mini-open conventional screw fixation to the all-arthroscopic fixation techniques. Recent evidence shows that the all-arthroscopic fixation techniques had higher subjective and objective knee outcome scores with the advantage of addressing concomitant intra-articular injuries such as osteochondral injuries or meniscal problems. Objectives: We propose an arthroscopic fixation technique using suture tapes placed in a suture-bridge technique and combined it with internal bracing to fix tibial-sided avulsion fracture of the PCL. Surgical Technique: After routine diagnostic knee arthroscopy in supine position via standard anterolateral and anteromedial portal, two standard posteromedial and posterolateral portal was created. A standard PCL aiming guide was used to create the tibial tunnel. PCL was secured using two single-looped suture tapes around it with both limbs brought to the posterior compartment through either side of the PCL (medial and lateral). Internal bracing was done with suture tape secured to the femoral side using fixed suspensory device and brought to the posterior compartment through the lateral side of the PCL. All tapes are then passed through the tibial tunnel in a suture-bridge manner and fixed to a button in 30° flexion while reduction quality was constantly checked under direct visualization. Results: The suture bridge configuration provides direct bone-to-bone healing and secure enough fixation for early range of motion and power exercises. All-arthroscopic approach avoids posterior element related complications such as fragment comminution and neurovascular injuries. Conclusions: This technique can be considered as a safe and effective method for fixation of tibial-sided PCL avulsion fracture, which allows active mobilization with lowered risk of complications.

No risk of iatrogenic peroneal nerve injury in all-inside lateral meniscal repair with either 14- or 18-mm needles through the popliteus tendon in the standard arthroscopic knee conditions.

The objectives of this prospective study were to evaluate the risk of peroneal nerve (PN) injury in simulated all-inside lateral meniscal repair with sutures placed through the popliteus tendon (PT) and to determine the optimal needle length. Twenty-nine axial magnetic resonance images (MRI) of postoperative knees with infused intra-articular fluid and in a figure-of-four position were used. The cross-sectional length of the PT was divided into four equal parts with measurements performed at the 25%, 50% and 75% points according to their anteroposterior arrangement. Simulated repairs were performed with 14-mm and 18-mm straight needles via the anteromedial (AM) and anterolateral (AL) portals. Distances from the needle tip following full insertion through the PT to the PN and from the anterior PT border to the posterior knee capsule were measured to determine PN injury risk and ideal needle insertion depths at the different landmarks. Simulated repairs onthe 29 knee MRI images resulted in no incidences of PN injury. The average distances from the needle tip to the PN of the 14-mm needle were significantly greater than the 18-mm needle in all the simulated repairs (P < 0.02), except at the 25% point in the AM approach. When using the 14-mm needle, capsule underpenetration was found in three knees (10.3%) at the 25% point during the AM approach, in one knee (3.4%) at the 50% and 75% points in the AM approach, and in all repairs from the AL portal. The average distances from the anterior PT border to the capsule at the 25%, 50%, and 75% division points on the PT in the AM approach were 7.7 ± 2.7mm, 7.9 ± 2.5mm and 7.6 ± 2.8mm, respectively, whilst in the AL approach were 8.4 ± 2.9mm, 8.1 ± 2.8mm and 7.6 ± 2.7mm. Simulated all-inside lateral meniscal repair with suture placement through the PT with 14-mm and 18-mm needles was safe. The measurements in this study can be used to determine potential PN injury risk in relation to the PT and the appropriate needle length for safe lateral meniscal repairs.

Hip Arthroscopy With Fluoroscopy-Free Technique for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement

Hip arthroscopy is the predominant surgical procedure for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI). Usually, hip arthroscopy requires intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance for portal establishment, acetabuloplasty, suture anchor placement, and femoroplasty, which has disadvantages such as radiation exposure and prolonged operative time. This article presents a technique of hip arthroscopy without fluoroscopy throughout. By establishing portals through a semiopen hollow guide bar, “one-line trimming” for pincer deformity removal, modified distal anterolateral portal for anchor placement, “triangular abrasion” for cam deformity resection, and intraoperative dynamic examination to ensure adequate relief of impingement, we provide a safe and effective surgical procedure for hip arthroscopy to treat FAI without fluoroscopy.

The use of posteromedial portal for arthroscopic treatment of synovial chondromatosis of the knee: a case report

The synovial chondromatosis is an uncommon proliferative metaplastic process of the synovial cells that can develop in any synovial joint. An isolated primary chondromatosis of the posterior compartment of the knee is uncommon and few cases are reported in literature. Our purpose is to describe a rare case of primary chondromatosis of the knee posterior compartment and report the arthroscopic loose bodies excision through a difficult posteromedial portal, avoiding the use of the accessory posterior portal, most commonly reported for approaching this disease. We report a rare case of a 35-year-old Caucasian male patient with diagnosis of chondromatosis of the posterior knee compartment. The radiographs showed multiple loose bodies of the posterior compartment. The MRI revealed minimal synovial hypertrophy areas, multiple osteophytes in the intercondylar notch, and loose bodies in the posteromedial compartment. The CT allowed us to assess the bony structures, the morphology of the intercondylar notch, and the presence osteophytes of the medial and lateral femoral condyles. The CT images were crucial to plan how to reach the posterior compartments of the knee through a trans-notch passage. The patient underwent arthroscopic surgery using anteromedial, anterolateral, and posteromedial portals. The tunneling through the intercondylar osteophytes was performed to allow the arthroscope to pass trans-notch. To avoid additional accessory posterior portals, we used a 70° arthroscope to better explore the posterior knee compartment. The cartilage-like bodies were removed and synovectomy of the inflamed areas was performed. The clinical and radiological follow-up was 12months and the patient showed excellent clinical outcomes, returning to his activities of daily living and sport activity. Our case report highlights the importance of the arthroscopic approach to treat synovial chondromatosis, despite the involvement of the posterior compartment of the knee. An optimal preoperative imaging allows to plan for the proper surgical procedure even in patients with severe osteoarthritis. Moreover, the adoption of an intercondylar notch tunneling and a 70° arthroscope can help surgeons to better explore the posterior knee compartment, avoiding an accessory posterior trans-septal portal. Therefore, a synovectomy of the inflamed foci may be useful to prevent recurrence.