Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Research Articles

Knee Flexion Angle of Fixation During Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction or Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Lateral Extra-articular Reinforcement Techniques Performed in Conjunction With ACL Reconstruction.

Anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) or lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being used more frequently in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the knee flexion angle at which fixation of ALLR or LET is performed during the procedure is quite variable based on existing technique descriptions. The purpose of this study was to identify whether flexion angle at the time of ALLR/LET fixation affected postoperative outcomes in a clinical population. It was hypothesized that ALLR/LET fixation at low versus high flexion angles would lead to no statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcome measures and graft failure rates. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to identify published clinical studies of ACLR with ALLR/LET in which the knee flexion angle at the time of ALLR/LET was reported. A priori, low flexion was defined as 0° to 30°, and high flexion was defined as 60° to 90°. Studies were excluded if the flexion angle was between 31° and 59° because these angles constituted neither low nor high flexion angles and including them in an analysis of high versus low flexion angle at fixation would have biased the study results toward the null. The overall risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled results of the studies were analyzed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scores, along with reported graft failure rates. A total of 32 clinical studies (5230 patients) met inclusion criteria: 22 studies (1999 patients) in the low-flexion group and 10 studies (3231 patients) in the high-flexion group. The median Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score was 6. Comparisons of patients with a low flexion angle versus a high flexion angle demonstrated no differences in the IKDC (P = .84), Lysholm (P = .67), or Tegner (P = .44) scores or in graft failure (3.4% vs 4.1%, respectively; P = .69). The results of this review indicated that ACLR performed in conjunction with ALLR/LET provides good to excellent patient-reported outcomes and low graft failure rates when ALLR/LET fixation is performed in either low or high knee flexion.

A Lateral Extra-articular Procedure Reduces the Failure Rate of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery Without Increasing Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Lateral extra-articular procedures are becoming increasingly popular in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, especially in patients with persistent rotatory instability and in a high-risk population. However, few studies have investigated the outcomes of the lateral extra-articular procedure as an associated procedure in an ACL revision (R-ACLR) setting and its benefit with respect to isolated intra-articular reconstruction. Hypothesis: Lateral extra-articular procedures reduce the failure rate of revision ACL reconstruction (R-ACLR). Purpose: To compare subjective outcomes, knee stability, and failure and complication rates between patients who underwent ACL revision with and without an associated lateral extra-articular procedure. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and OVID databases was performed on September 2022 in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Eligible studies were trials directly comparing patients who had isolated ACL revision with patients who had ACL revision associated with lateral extra-articular procedures at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. A meta-analysis was performed, and bias and the quality of the evidence were rated according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Eight studies were included: a total of 334 patients were treated with isolated revision (isolated (R-ACLR)) and 342 treated with combined revision and a lateral extra-articular procedure (combined (R-ACLR)). For the failure rate, the meta-analysis showed a significantly decreased relative risk reduction of 54% (P = .004) in patients with combined (R-ACLR) with respect to isolated R-ACL, whereas no difference in complication rate was observed. The combined (R-ACLR) group demonstrated a decreased risk ratio of 50% (P = .002) for having a positive pivot-shift test result and a relative risk reduction of 68% (P = .003) for having a grade 2-3 pivot shift when compared with the isolated (R-ACLR) group. Finally, no significant differences were observed among the lateral extra-articular procedures. Conclusion: The addition of a lateral extra-articular procedure to revision ACL significantly reduced the failure rate and postoperative pivot shift without increasing the complication rate. Anterolateral ligament reconstruction and a lateral extra-articular procedure with iliotibial band were effective in improving the outcomes of revision ACL reconstruction. Further high-level studies could help to clarify which subgroup of patients could particularly benefit from an anterolateral procedure in the context of ACL revision.

Podium Presentation Title: Combined Anterior Cruciate & Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Confers Lower Graft Rupture Rates

Podium Presentation Title: Combined Anterior Cruciate & Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Confers Lower Graft Rupture Rates

All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with and without anterolateral ligament reconstruction: a prospective study.

There is no clear consensus regarding the superiority of a combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) versus an isolated ACLR. In this study, we compared the postoperative stability profile, complications, and patient-reported outcomes of these procedures. Twenty-one patients with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear who were either treated by an isolated all-inside ACLR (n = 21) or a combined all-inside ACLR and ALLR (n = 20) were included. The outcomes were evaluated in the last follow-up and included the postoperative stability profile evaluated by the Lachman test, pivot shift test, and KT-1000 side-to-side difference, postoperative complications, and patient-reported outcomes evaluated by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and Lysholm knee scale. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. The residual Lachman and pivot shift were not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.41 and P = 0.18, respectively). The mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 1.93 ± 1.9mm in the isolated and 1.635 ± 0.91mm in the combined group (P = 0.01). The mean improvement of the IKDC score was not significantly different between the isolated and combined groups (24.7 vs. 25.2, P = 0.28). The mean improvement of the Lysholm scale was not significantly different between the isolated and combined groups (33.5 vs. 34.1, P = 0.19). ACL re-rupture occurred in three patients of the isolated group and no patient of the combined group. The outcomes of patients in the present study support performing a combined ALL and ACL reconstruction.

Anterolateral augmentation procedures during anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in skeletally immature patients: Scoping review of surgical techniques and outcomes.

Graft failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in children and adolescents are higher compared to adults. Anterolateral augmentation procedures have recently generated increased focus regarding their ability to reduce graft failure rates. Concerns in skeletally immatures are potential growth disturbances and overconstraint after anterolateral augmentation. The aim of this scoping review is to provide an overview of all current anterolateral augmentation procedures in skeletally immature patients and to discuss surgical techniques, clinical and biomechanical outcomes. This scoping review was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) statement extension for scoping reviews. On 22December 2022, an information specialist performed a systematic literature search in Cochrane, PubMed (Medline) and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were anterolateral augmentation procedures, including lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR), in combination with ACLR in skeletally immatures. Twenty studies were included after screening 1.485 abstracts. Seventeen studies describe LET techniques, four studies ALLR techniques and one study both techniques. Biomechanical data is scarce and shows conflicting results. Two studies compared ACLR with LET to ACLR in skeletally immatures with promising results in favour of the combined procedure. There were no differences in outcomes between LET and ALLR. Several LET and ALLR techniques have been described for skeletally immature patients and the first clinical data on LET and ALLR is available, which showed promising results. Further research is necessary to evaluate the risk of growth disturbances and overconstraint in skeletally immatures. Level IV.

How To Avoid Suture Damage in Simultaneous Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Lateral Meniscal Posterior Root Reinsertion With the Transtibial Pullout Technique: A Technical Note

Lateral meniscus posterior root tears (LMPRTs) are estimated to occur in 7% to 12% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knees. This topic is of great interest because of their biomechanical consequences in terms of interruption of hoop stress distribution. If left unrepaired, the corresponding compartment is exposed to unfavorable contact dynamics, similar to those resulting from a total meniscectomy. This Technical Note describes a transtibial LMPRT repair using a Knee Scorpion and an 18-gauge spinal needle. It is a reproducible arthroscopic LMPR reinsertion technique combined with concomitant standard ACL + anterolateral ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons and it describes how to safely avoid damage to root traction sutures during the ACL independent tibial tunnel drilling.

Short-term results of combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction using a novel hamstrings graft construct in obese patients: a pilot study

Abstract Background Elevated body mass index (BMI) was associated with increased complication rates including failures in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. We present our short-term results of our technique used for ACL reconstruction in obese patients with the aim to reduce chances for graft failure and improve outcomes. Patients and methods We present our case series of obese patients (BMI > 30) operated for ACL reconstruction during the period from January 2017 to January 2022 using a dedicated technique for ACL reconstruction. We are using hamstring tendons prepared in a single construct to reconstruct both the intra-articular ACL and the anterolateral ligament. All patients received the same surgical technique and associated injuries were operated on according to their indications and guidelines. All patients completed the subjective knee evaluation form of the International Knee Documentation Committee at the time of the procedure and at the last follow-up visit and assessment of knee laxity was performed using a KT-1000 arthrometer before the surgery and at the last follow-up. Results Twenty patients underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using this technique during the study period, with average follow-up period of 1 year. All cases were males, mean BMI was 32.2 (30.4–36.2), 18 cases were operated on using ipsilateral Semitendinosus and Gracilis grafts, 2 cases were operated on using contralateral knee hamstrings. All cases were instructed nonweight bearing for 6 weeks after surgery and received the same standard accelerated rehabilitation protocol. Two cases developed postoperative superficial wound infection at the graft harvest site that resolved with conservative treatment of oral antibiotics and wound care. The mean postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee score improved from 45.195 to 79.245 (P<0.001), and the mean KT-1000 arthrometer differential improved from 11.8 to 2.77 (P<0.001) and pivot shift tests were negative in the postoperative exam for all the cases. Conclusion ACLR in obese patients should be approached with care, our technique can offer a feasible solution to obtain an acceptable outcome, Further work is required to provide insight on the long-term outcome of ACLR in obese patients.

Outcome of combined anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus with iliotibial band tenodesis

Abstract Background Isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears without anterolateral structures injuries are treated successfully by isolated reconstruction of ACL. However, most ACL injuries are associated with the injuries of anterolateral stabilizers of the knee; mainly the iliotibial tract (ITB) and the anterolateral ligament (ALL). If ACL is only reconstructed in such a case, the incidence of postoperative rotational instability reaches 18%. New directions guided towards combined ACL reconstruction with extraarticular anatomical and nonanatomical reconstructions to improve knee rotation and translation and prevent pivot shift phenomena. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients operated on for combined injuries of ACL and anterolateral stabilizers from February 2019 to February 2021. Preoperatively and postoperatively, all patients were examined clinically by knee stability tests: anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot shift tests, applying the International Knee Documentation Committee score and return time to the sport. Results Forty patients were included with a mean age of 28 ± 8.33 years (range, 18–44 years). Patients were divided into two groups, group A 20 patients (18 males and two females) were treated by combined ACL with ALL reconstruction, and group B 20 patients (18 males and two females) were treated by combined ACL with ITB tenodesis. Sports injuries were the cause in 15 patients in group A and 14 in group B, while five injuries were due to nonsport activity in group A and six in group B. The mean follow-up period was 33.5 ± 2.1 months. Median postoperative subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores in groups A and B were 95.4 and 94.25, respectively, without any statistically significant difference. Group A shows better postoperative improvement in pivot shift and one-leg hop test than group B with a significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion No significant difference between ALL reconstruction or ITB tenodesis with ACL reconstruction according to subjective knee functions but there was a significant difference according to objective functions, also lateral knee pain was reported in group B and not observed in group A.

Evaluation of Graft Maturation by MRI in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Concomitant Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (SB-ACLR) with concomitant anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) has been associated with better clinical results when compared with isolated SB-ACLR. However, it is not known whether the improved outcomes are the result of the influence of concomitant ALLR on ACL graft healing. The purpose of this study was to determine whether concomitant ALLR is associated with improved graft ligamentization after SB-ACLR. It was hypothesized that ALLR would not affect graft healing. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A 1 to 1 matching study was conducted on a consecutive series of 732 patients who underwent ACLR using a hamstring tendon autograft between 2007 and 2019. Patients were excluded if they had skeletal immaturity, inflammatory joint disease, multiple ligament reconstruction (other than ALLR), or a graft rupture. Patients with concomitant SB-ACLR and ALLR (SB-ACLR/ALLR) and isolated SB-ACLR were matched 1 to 1 based on age, sex, examination under anesthesia (EUA) grade 3 pivot shift, EUA grade 3 anterior drawer test, presence of graft impingement, sagittal graft angle, skeletal maturity, lack of generalized ligamentous laxity, and multiple ligamentous injury. A total of 40 matched pairs underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within the second year after surgery to assess graft ligamentization, which was measured by the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) of the ACL graft. The mean follow-up period was 41 months, with a 2-year follow-up rate of 80% in the SB-ACLR/ALLR group and 98% in the isolated SB-ACLR group. The mean duration between the index operation and MRI was 16.4 ± 3.4 months. No significant difference was observed in the SNQ of the ACL graft between the SB-ACLR/ALLR and SB-ACLR groups (6.9 ± 4.6 vs 5.2 ± 4.8, respectively; P = .066). Study findings indicated that a concomitant ALLR at the time of hamstring tendon autograft ACLR did not affect graft healing as assessed by the SNQ of the ACL graft.

Progress in research on and classification of surgical methods of arthroscopic reconstruction of the ACL and ALL using a shared tendon graft through the femoral tunnel.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a common clinical injury, and ACL reconstruction has reached a very mature stage. However, with the accumulation of cases, scholars have found that isolated ACL reconstruction may not completely solve the problem of knee rotational stability. With the increase in our understanding of knee joint structure, ACL combined with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction has become accepted by most scholars, and this operation has also achieved good clinical results. At present, there is no unified surgical method for ACL combined with ALL reconstruction. There are differences in bone tunnel location, reconstruction methods, and graft selection. Compared with the independent reconstruction of the ACL and ALL during the operation, shared tendon graft reconstruction of the ACL and ALL has the advantages of preserving tendon and avoiding tunnel convergence. So far, there is no relevant literature summarizing the reconstruction of the ACL and ALL with a shared tendon graft. This paper reviews the anatomic study of the ALL, the study of isometric points, surgical indications, and surgical methods and their classification for shared tendon graft reconstruction of the ACL and ALL.

Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Using a Single Peroneus Longus Tendon Graft

The peroneus longus tendon seems a viable graft option for knee ligament reconstructions, with adequate biomechanical properties and low morbidity after harvesting. The objective of this article is to describe a combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction technique using a single peroneus longus tendon graft harvested from the infra malleolar region to ensure sufficient length.

A Cadaveric Study of the Optimal Isometric Region on the Anterolateral Surface of the Knee in Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Isolated intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is not capable of restoring instability in many cases leading some to recommend concomitant anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction. The satisfactory fixation site and graft length change are crucial in ligament reconstruction to restore the ALL function and avoid some unwanted graft behavior. The purpose of this investigation is to determine the optimal isometric region on the anterolateral aspect of the knee for ALL reconstruction using a three-dimensional optical instrument and a suture similar to an intraoperative isometric test. Six freshly frozen cadaveric human knees were used in this study. Data regarding the anterolateral surface were obtained using an optical measurement system to create a three-dimensional model. Nine points were selected on the femur (F1-F9) and tibia (Ta-Ti) respectively. The three-dimensional length change between each pair of tibial and femoral points was measured during passive knee flexion from 0° to 90° in 15° increments. Subsequently, five femoral points (A-E) were selected from the lateral femur, located in different areas relative to the lateral femoral epicondyle, and three tibial reference points (T1-T3) were selected in the isometric test. The changes in the length between each pair of reference points were measured using sutures. The 95% confidence interval for the rate of length change was estimated using the mean and standard deviation of the maximum rate of length change at different flexion angles, and the data were expressed as the mean (95% confidence interval) and compared with the maximum acceptable rate of change (10%). The maximum acceptable change rate for ligament reconstruction is 10%, and the mean maximum rates and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of length change for the point combinations were calculated. Among all the combined points measured using the optical measurement system and the suture, the qualified point combination for reconstruction was F3 (8mm posterior and 8mm proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle)-Tb (8mm proximal to the midpoint between the center of Gerdy's tubercle and the fibula head), A (posterior and proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle)-T2 (10mm below the joint line)and A-T3 (15 mm below the joint line). The position of F3-Tb and A-T2 are close to each other. The most isometric area of the femur for ALL reconstruction was posterior and proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle. We recommend that the initial location of the femoral point be set at 8 mm posterior and 8 mm proximal to the lateral femoral epicondyle and the tibial point at approximately 10 mm below the joint line, midway between Gerdy's tubercle and fibular head, and subsequently adjusted to the most satisfactory position according to the isometric test.

Does combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction improve return to sport?

Only 50-65% of patients return to their previous sporting level after ACL rupture. The literature reports a reduced rate of graft rupture when an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) is associated with ACL reconstruction. ACL reconstruction combined with ALL allows a higher return to sport at pre-injury level than isolated reconstruction in patients playing pivot-contact sports. A retrospective, single-centre study between 2012 and 2020 comparing reconstruction by hamstring tendon technique, isolated ACLR vs ACL with ALLR. An isokinetic test was performed at 6months post-operatively and patients were re-contacted at a minimum 2-year follow-up to assess their level and delay to return to sport, graft rupture rate and functional evaluation. 83 patients were included, 42 in ACLR group and 41 in ACL + ALLR group. Four patients were lost to follow-up and 79 patients were analysed. No significant difference was found on the level of return to sport (28.2% vs. 42.5%; p = 0.18), return to competition (43% vs. 60%; p = 0.18), delay to sports return, isokinetic assessment, functional scores, but a significant difference was found on graft rupture rate in favour of ALLR (12.8% vs. 0%; p = 0.02). In our study, the addition of an ALL to ACL reconstruction did not improve pre-injury sports recovery or return to competition. Cohort study, level of evidence 4.

Current development in surgical techniques, graft selection and additional procedures for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a path towards anatomic restoration and improved clinical outcomes-a narrative review.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been widely used for ACL injury for a long time. However, residual rotational instability and osteoarthritic changes after ACL reconstruction have been identified as problems. Thus, anatomic reconstruction techniques, various types of grafts and additional procedures have been desired to improve the clinical outcomes and knee instability. Although clinical outcomes and knee stability are better than in the past, ipsilateral graft failures still occur in 4-17% and osteoarthritic changes are seen in about 20% of patients after ACL reconstruction. To remedy these problems, it is necessary to improve the understanding of various surgical techniques and grafts and to pursue further improvement of surgical techniques. Therefore, the objective of this review is to summarize the advantages and disadvantages of various surgical techniques and graft selection, and additional procedures for ACL injury. A literature review was conducted on the surgical procedures for ACL injury. Recent trends in surgical techniques, graft selection, and additional procedures for ACL injury were described. We performed a literature search in PubMed for studies published from origin to May 8, 2023. Studies were required to be English-language articles. Although many reports indicate that double-bundle ACL reconstruction is comparable to anatomic single-bundle (SB) reconstruction, intraoperative complications such as tunnel coalition exist in double-bundle reconstruction, and the technique needs to be improved. ACL repair has shown good short-term results, but long-term results need to be examined in the future. Quadriceps tendon autograft is being used more frequently, but hamstrings tendon autograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft also have good results. In addition, in higher-risk cases, lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction can be performed with good results. To further improve clinical outcomes, more anatomical reconstructions should be pursued. Autografts are better than allografts and synthetic grafts, but further study is needed to determine which graft is better. Additional procedures should be performed in highly unstable cases and in revision cases.

Comparison Between Continuous and Separate Grafts for ALL Reconstruction When Combined With ACL Reconstruction: A Retrospective Cohort Study From the SANTI Study Group

Background: While various techniques have been described to augment the anterolateral side of the knee, such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction (ALLR), it is unclear how they affect clinical outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare the results of 2 ALLR techniques for combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)/ALL reconstruction. Hypothesis: The graft rupture rate, complications, and patient-reported outcomes are similar between a reconstruction technique using a continuous gracilis graft (CG) and single femoral tunnel for ACL/ALL reconstruction, and one using a separate gracilis graft (SG) and independent femoral tunnels. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively at 2 hospitals was conducted: one in which a CG is preferred when performing combined ACL/ALL reconstruction and the other in which an SG is preferred. The medical records at these 2 hospitals were searched to identify ACL-deficient patients who had undergone ACL/ALL reconstruction between 2015 and 2020. Eligible patients were between 18 and 60 years of age, had the reconstruction surgery done within 24 months of the injury, and had ≥2 years of follow-up. The eligible patients were contacted to gather outcomes, or their outcomes were collected in person during their last follow-up visit. Outcomes evaluated included graft rupture rate, complication rate, and Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores. Preoperative and intraoperative data were also evaluated. Results: A total of 237 patients were available for analysis in the GC group and 178 in the SG group with a mean follow-up of 3 years (CG: SD, 9.6 months; SG: SD, 8.1 months). The authors found a low rate of graft rupture (CG: 3.4%; SG: 2.8%; P = .785) and no difference between techniques. The complication rate was 6% in the CG group, while it was 10% in the SG group (P = .112). The mean value of the IKDC-SKF was similar between techniques (CG: 88.1; SG: 87.9; P = .267), and the mean Lysholm score was excellent in both sets of patients (CG: 90.0; SG: 92.4; P < .001). Conclusion: This study found little to no difference in the graft rupture rate, complication rate, and functional knee scores when using a CG or SG for ALLR during combined ACL/ALL reconstruction. Both techniques are equivalent and can be used for an anterolateral augmentation procedure in combination with ACL reconstruction.

Comparison of ACL and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction With Isolated ACL Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft: Outcomes in Young Female Patients With High-Grade Pivot Shift.

Inferior return to sports (RTS) and functional outcomes have been reported in women after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The purpose was to evaluate the results of combined ACLR and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) in young women with a high-grade pivot shift (grade ≥2). It was hypothesized that combined ACLR and ALLR would result in better RTS and rotational stability than isolated ACLR. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Two groups were retrospectively evaluated and compared. Group I (n = 39; mean age, 31.1 ± 5.7 years) underwent isolated ACLR using hamstring autografts; group C (n = 39; mean age, 30.4 ± 6.1 years) underwent combined ACLR and ALLR. Subjective outcome measures included the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form, Lysholm, Tegner, and ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI). Objective tests included a KT-2000 arthrometer stress test, a pivot-shift test, an isokinetic strength test, a Y-balance test, and a single-leg hop test. A postoperative questionnaire was administered to determine the rates and types of RTS, quality of sports performance, and reinjury and satisfaction rates. Subjective scores and clinical tests were performed at 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy were conducted during the 1- and 2-year follow-ups, respectively. The mean follow-up for groups I and C were 30.4 ± 3.9 and 29.3 ± 3.5 months, respectively (P = .194). Patients in group C had better anteroposterior (P = .001) and rotational (P = .005) stability and higher ACL-RSI scores (P = .025) than those in group I. Group C had higher composite and posteromedial reach scores on the Y-balance test than group I (P = .014 and P = .010, respectively). A total of 26 (66.7%) patients in group C and 17 (43.6%) in group I returned to their prior level of sports (P = .040). Rerupture of the ACL graft and contralateral ACL rupture occurred in 2 (5.1%) and 2 (5.1%) patients in group I, respectively, compared with no rerupture or contralateral ACL rupture in group C. Combined ACLR and ALLR in young women with a high-grade pivot shift was associated with better knee stability parameters, dynamic postural stability, and psychological readiness to RTS than isolated ACLR.

ALL Repair and Reconstruction: Techniques From the SANTI Study Group

Background: Combining an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with an anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction results in significant advantages including reduced graft rupture rates, a lower risk of reoperation for secondary meniscectomy, improved knee stability, and higher rates of return to preinjury levels of sport. Indications: The previously reported indications for combined ACL and ALL reconstruction are as follows: ACL reconstruction revision; high-grade pivot shift test; long-term ACL rupture; young patients; pivoting activities; concomitant medial meniscus repair, and, specifically, regarding the ALL repair, it must be an acute surgery (within 15 days from injury). Technique Description: Several modern techniques have been described to repair and reconstruct the ALL. This technical note details a number of these techniques performed by the Scientific Anterior Cruciate Ligament Network International (SANTI) Study Group. Results: First, we describe a combined ACL reconstruction and double-bundle ALL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. Secondly, we describe a single-bundle ALL reconstruction using gracilis autograft. Thirdly, we describe an ALL reconstruction technique using a knotless soft anchor, which provides shallow fixation and prevents tunnel convergence. Finally, we describe a technique for ALL repair. Conclusion: Several techniques have been described to repair and reconstruct the ALL, all offering significant advantages over an isolated ACL reconstruction. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

684 Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Versus Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Lateral Augmentation for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Minimum 2- Year Follow-Up: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Lateral augmentation (LA) of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) aims to improve the anterolateral stability of the knee and patient functional outcomes while reducing complication rates. Despite growing evidence and popularity, there have been no studies directly comparing the main two methods of LA; Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LEAT) and Anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR). Aim To establish level I evidence by assessing studies with minimum two-years follow-up investigating LEAT and ALLR patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and post-operative complications. Method This is a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The primary investigators (AA/FS) on August 1st, 2022 undertook a comprehensive systematic review of electronic databases. Studies that met our inclusion criteria were selected. Results 14 studies were included in our study with a total of 2374 patients. 1273 patients were included in the LEAT studies (666 male, 607 female) and 1101 in the ALLR studies (818 male, 283 female). Statistically significant improved PROM were found in the LEAT group for postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee Scores (MD 2.31; 95% CI: 0.54 – 4.09, P = 0.01), Tegner Activity score (MD 0.79, 95% CI: 0.58 – 0.99, P&amp;lt;0.01), and for both the ALLR (MD 1.43, 95% CI: 0.33 – 2.52, P = 0.01) and LEAT (MD 4.07, 95% CI: 2.67 – 5.47, P&amp;lt;0.01) groups for Lysholm scores. LEAT and ALLR are associated with reduced graft re-rupture risk and improved postoperative knee stability. Conclusions LA is associated with improved PROM, knee stability, and functional outcomes when compared to iACLR. No differences were found between LEAT to ALLR.

Return to Sports After ACL Augmentation With Anterolateral Reconstruction (ALR) Harvesting Gracilis Only Compared With ACL Reconstruction With ALR Harvesting Both Hamstring Tendons.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (ACL-Rp) is known to be a valuable alternative to ACL reconstruction (ACL-Rc) in selected indications. The majority of the ACL-Rp techniques recommend the use of a synthetic brace. The use of the gracilis allows both a biological internal brace and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALR). The primary objective was to compare the early ability to return to sports between patients who underwent ACL-Rp using a gracilis autograft as an internal brace augmentation with ALR and patients who underwent the conventional ACL-Rc with ALR technique sacrificing both the gracilis and the semitendinosus. The secondary objective was to compare the failure rate, clinical scores, and return to sports at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. A retrospective analysis was undertaken. A total of 49 patients who underwent ACL-Rp with ALR between December 2018 and May 2019 were propensity matched at a 1:1 ratio to those who underwent ACL-Rc with ALR during the same period. The decision to perform ACL-Rp with ALR was based on preoperative selection and intraoperative arthroscopic findings: proximal avulsion tear, partial ACL tear, low- to midlevel sports participation, and good tissue quality. The ability to return to sports was assessed using isokinetic tests and the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test functional test at 6 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, knee laxity parameters, return to sports, and clinical outcome (Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury score) were recorded. The ACL-Rp group had significantly less hamstring strength deficit when compared with their counterparts who underwent ACL-Rc (0.2% vs 10.2% in concentric, P < .001; 2.5% vs 14% in eccentric, P < .001). The mean Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test score was significantly higher in the ACL-Rc group (69.7% ± 16.6% [range, 19%-100%] vs 61% ± 16.8% [range, 19%-100%]; P = .001). In the ACL-Rp group, 61% (30/49) of the patients were authorized to return to pivot sports versus 41% (20/49) in the ACL-Rc group (P = .04). At a mean final follow-up of 31.4 ± 3.5 months, no significant differences were demonstrated between groups with respect to clinical scores and knee laxity parameters. There was a trend for a higher failure rate in the ACL-Rp group without any significance (ACL-Rp: 6.1% [3/49] vs ACL-Rc: 0%; P = .08). At 6 months after operation, harvesting only the gracilis with this ACL-Rp and augmentation with ALR technique was linked to a better early ability to return to sports compared with the ACL-Rc with ALR technique harvesting both the gracilis and semitendinosus. This technique had a limited effect on early flexion strength and provided a satisfactory rerupture rate.

Additional Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Helps Patients Improve Dynamic Postural Stability in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Background and Objectives: The goal in treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury especially in revision cases is return to sports activity by regaining dynamic postural stability. Among various methods to achieve this goal, additional anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) is gaining attention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of additional ALLR in revision ACL reconstruction (RACLR). Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent RACLR between July 2015 and June 2018 were enrolled. The exclusion criteria were less than 1-year follow-up, age older than 45 years, concomitant multiple ligament injuries, contralateral knee injury, subtotal or total meniscectomized state, and articular cartilage lesions worse than Outerbridge grade 3. Thirty-nine patients (20 patients; RACLR only (Group A), 19 patients; RACLR with additional ALLR (Group B)) were included. Clinical scores (Lysholm score, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Tegner activity scale), isokinetic strength test, single-leg-hop for distance test (SLHDT), Y-balance test (YBT) were checked preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Results: Limb symmetry index values in YBT showed significantly better result in Group B 1-year postoperatively (Group A: 97.2 ± 4.0, Group B: 100.3 ± 2.9, p = 0.010), although there were no differences preoperatively between groups (Group A: 90.4 ± 6.7, Group B: 89.3 ± 5.5, p = 0.594). Regarding clinical scores, isokinetic strength tests, and SLHDT, there were no differences between groups preoperatively nor 1-year postoperatively. Conclusions: Additional ALLR in RACLR helped patients gain better dynamic postural stability at 1-year postoperative follow-up.