An a priori assumption of all currently available IGRT methods is that vertebral (VB) body position is an accurate surrogate for spinal cord (SC) position, since the spinal cord is not well visualized by x-ray based imaging (kV:kV, CBCT). A new MR-IGRT system has been developed which consists of a split 0.35T MR scanner straddled by three 60Co heads mounted on a ring gantry which share a common isocenter. Given the superior ability for MR to visualize the SC, we sought to use MR-IGRT to compare the relative motion of the SC versus the VB. Three healthy volunteers were immobilized in vacuum immobilization bags and underwent volumetric MR at baseline (t0) and again in 5 minute intervals during the course of a mock treatment on a MR-IGRT system. The mock treatment was repeated for 2 additional fractions by removing the patient from the immobilization and then restarting the process completely. The MR protocol was a true fast imaging with steady state precession T2*/T1-weighted volumetric scan with a 1.5 x 1.5 mm resolution and field of view selected based on patient size. Images were imported into a third party treatment planning system, and registrations were performed at the T5 VB level for each patient and each fraction with t0 as reference using either (1) the VB or (2) the SC. Registrations were performed via automated registration with a narrow field of view followed by manual adjustment by the clinician. Differences in motion in the lateral and anterior-posterior (AP) directions and 2D in-plane shifts between SV and VB were calculated. All 3 volunteers were able to complete the course of mock treatment. The SC was well visualized with a high level of contrast between SC and surrounding CSF. Average difference in lateral motion of SC relative to VB across all 3 fractions for patients 1, 2, and 3 was -0.7 +/- 0.4 mm, -0.8 +/- 0.5 mm, and -0.4 +/- 0.3 mm. Average difference in AP motion was -0.1 +/- 0.6 mm, -0.1 +/- 0.5 mm, and 0.2 +/- 0.3 mm. Average difference in 2D motion was 0.9 +/- 0.4 mm, 0.9 +/- 0.5 mm, 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm. No time trends were noted across the 30 minute treatment. Maximum lateral, AP, and VS between SC and VB across all patients and all fractions was -1.4 mm, -1.2 mm, and 1.8 mm, respectively. The SC is well visualized with MR-IGRT and for the first time patient specific shifts can be made directly based on SC position rather than VB as a surrogate. A small but consistent difference in calculated shifts was observed when shifting based on SC versus VB, largely in the lateral direction. Average differences in a clinically relevant 2D shift were generally < 1 mm, but were up to 1.8 mm at certain time points. Confirmed in a larger cohort, such data may also be informative for generation of SC planning risk volume margins at a population level.
Read full abstract