PurposeThe purpose of this study was to explore differences in cam morphology defined by alpha angle and anterior femoral neck offset, in the context of other anthropometric parameters in an osteologic collection to further elucidate whether each measurement tool is identifying the same underlying pathology. MethodsAnthropometric measurements of 992 cadaveric hips from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection were analyzed. Femurs with cam morphology were identified by AA >55° or AFNO <7mm. Anthropometric parameters stratified by cam morphology were assessed with Wilcoxon rank-sum and Pearson’s chi-squared tests. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed on significant variables in univariate analysis to examine the predictive ability of anthropometric variables to cam morphology. ResultsCam morphology was identified in 242 hips via AA, 344 hips via AFNO, and 123 hips via both measures. Multivariate logarithmic regression analysis demonstrated that sex negatively predicted AA (females with less pathology, β= -0.14, p= 0.04), race negatively predicted AA (blacks with less pathology, β= -0.21, p<0.01), and proximal femoral osteoarthritis was positively associated with AA (β= 0.16, p= 0.02), while none of these were associated with AFNO. On the other hand, right side specimens were associated with AA (β= 0.15, p= 0.02) and AFNO (β= 0.25, p= <0.01), whereas combined version was unassociated with both measures. ConclusionIn conclusion, cam morphology was identified in a modest percentage of osteological specimens by both AA and AFNO in our study. Further, associations of multiple demographic, anthropometric and anatomical parameters to alpha angle and anterior femoral neck offset suggest they may identify different subsets of cam morphology.