Anterior Decompression With Fusion Research Articles

Anterior decompression and posterior total laminectomy with fusion for ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Surgical approaches to cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remain controversial. The purpose of the present study was to analyze and compare the long-term neurological recovery following anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior laminectomy and fusion with bone graft and internal fixation (PLF) based on > ten-year follow-up outcomes in a single centre. Included in this retrospective cohort study were 48 patients (12 females; mean age 55.79 years (SD 8.94)) who were diagnosed with cervical OPLL, received treatment in our centre, and were followed up for 10.22 to 15.25 years. Of them, 24 patients (six females; mean age 52.88 years (SD 8.79)) received ADF, and the other 24 patients (five females; mean age 56.25 years (SD 9.44)) received PLF. Clinical data including age, sex, and the OPLL canal-occupying ratio were analyzed and compared. The primary outcome was Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, and the secondary outcome was visual analogue scale neck pain. Compared with the baseline, neurological function improved significantly after surgery in all patients of both groups (p < 0.001). The JOA recovery rate in the ADF group was significantly higher than that in the PLF group (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in postoperative cervical pain between the two groups (p = 0.387). The operating time was longer and intraoperative blood loss was greater in the PLF group than the ADF group. More complications were observed in the ADF group than in the PLF group, although the difference was not statistically significant. Long-term neurological function improved significantly after surgery in both groups, with the improvement more pronounced in the ADF group. There was no significant difference in postoperative neck pain between the two groups. The operating time was shorter and intraoperative blood loss was lower in the ADF group; however, the incidence of perioperative complications was higher.

Prospective Comparative Study of Dysphagia after Subaxial Cervical Spine Surgery: Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Ossification

We prospectively investigated the postoperative dysphagia in cervical posterior longitudinal ligament ossification (C-OPLL) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to identify the risk factors of each disease and the incidence. A series of 55 cases with C-OPLL: 13 anterior decompression with fusion (ADF), 16 posterior decompression with fusion (PDF), and 26 laminoplasty (LAMP), and a series of 123 cases with CSM: 61 ADF, 5 PDF, and 57 LAMP, were included. Vertebral level, number of segments, approach, and with or without fusion, and pre and postoperative values of Bazaz dysphagia score, C2-7 lordotic angle (&ang;C2-7), cervical range of motion, O-C2 lordotic angle, cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and visual analog scale for neck pain were investigated. New dysphagia was defined as an increase in the Bazaz dysphagia score by one grade or more than one year after surgery. New dysphagia occurred in 12 cases with C-OPLL; 6 with ADF (46.2%), 4 with PDF (25%), 2 with LAMP (7.7%), and in 19 cases with CSM; 15 with ADF (24.6%), 1 with PDF (20%), and 3 with LAMP (1.8%). There was no significant difference in the incidence between the two diseases. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increased &ang;C2-7 was a risk factor for both diseases.

Cervical alignment and clinical outcome of anterior decompression with fusion vs. posterior decompression with fixation in kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Cervical kyphosis is a common but potentially debilitating and challenging condition. There is controversy on the optimal surgical strategy for the treatment of kyphotic cervical spondylotic myelopathy (KCSM) using either anterior approach or posterior approach. The purpose of this study was to investigate the surgical efficacy of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) vs. posterior decompression with fixation (PDF) for the treatment of KCSM, and to further analyze the changes of cervical spinal alignment parameters and axial symptoms (AS) severity after kyphotic correction. We retrospectively reviewed 117 patients with KCSM who had undergone ADF (58 patients) and PDF (59 patients) between January 2016 and December 2020. Cervical spinal alignment parameters, including curvature index (CI) and C2-7 Cobb angle, were measured on the PreOP and PostOP lateral radiographs. Recovery rate was calculated based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. AS severity was quantified by Neck Disability Index (NDI). A P-value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. The patient mean age, gender, presenting symptoms and follow-up time were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences (P < 0.001) between the two groups regarding the operation levels, operating time and intraoperative blood loss. Analysis of PostOP follow-up data showed significant differences (P < 0.001) in CI, correction of CI, C2-7 Cobb angle, and NDI between the two groups, whereas no significant differences in JOA score (P = 0.16) and recovery rate (P = 0.14). There were significant differences (P < 0.001) in CI, C2-7 Cobb angle, JOA score, and NDI between PreOP and PostOP follow-up in each group. Correction of CI showed positive correlation with recovery of NDI in Group ADF (r = 0.51, P < 0.001), and in Group PDF (r = 0.45, P < 0.001). Satisfied neurological improvement was obtained by ADF and PDF for patients with KCSM. Cervical kyphotic correction caused significant improvement of AS, and was more favorable with ADF than with PDF. Surgeons should pay full consideration of the merits and shortcomings of each approach when deciding on a surgical plan.

Biomechanical analysis of laminectomy, laminoplasty, posterior decompression with instrumented fusion, and anterior decompression with fusion for the kyphotic cervical spine.

Anterior and posterior decompressions for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy may lead to clinical improvements. However, patients with kyphotic cervical alignment have sometimes shown poor clinical outcomes with posterior decompression. There is a lack on report of mechanical analysis of the decompression procedures for kyphotic cervical alignment. This study employed a three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the cervical spine (C2-C7) with the pre-operative kyphotic alignment (Pre-OK) model and compared the biomechanical parameters (range of motion (ROM), annular stresses, nucleus stresses, and facet contact forces) for four decompression procedures at two levels (C3-C5); laminectomy (LN), laminoplasty (LP), posterior decompression with fusion (PDF), and anterior decompression with fusion (ADF). Pure moment with compressive follower load was applied to these models. PDF and ADF models' global ROM were 40% at C2-C7 less than the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models. The annular and nucleus stresses decreased more than 10% at the surgery levels for ADF, and PDF, compared to the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models. However, the annular stresses at the adjacent cranial level (C2-C3) of ADF were 20% higher. The nucleus stresses of the caudal adjacent level (C5-C6) of PDF were 20% higher, compared to other models. The PDF and ADF models showed a less than 70% decrease in the facet forces at the surgery levels, compared to the Pre-OK, LN, and LP models. The study concluded that posterior decompression, such as LN or LP, increases ROM, disc stress, and facet force and thus can lead to instability. Although there is the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD), PDF and ADF can stabilize the cervical spine even for kyphotic alignments.

Perioperative Complications of Anterior Decompression with Fusion in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy-A Comparative Study between Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database.

For ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) can accurately achieve spinal decompression. However, the difference in perioperative complications in ADF between OPLL and CSM is poorly described. This study aimed to investigate the perioperative complication rates of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy undergoing ADF, represented by OPLL and CSM, using a large national inpatient database. In the OPLL and CSM groups, postoperative complication (systemic and local) rates, reoperation rates, medical costs during hospitalization, and mortality after propensity score matching were compared. After matching, 1197 matched pairs were made. The incidence of total systemic complications was similar between both groups (OPLL, 12.4%; CSM, 12.2%). In the OPLL group, more perioperative local complications (cerebrospinal fluid leakage: CSFL, [OPLL, 2.7%; CSM, 0.3%] and surgical site infection: SSI [OPLL, 2.1%; CSM, 0.9%]) were detected, and the hospitalization cost was approximately $3200 higher than that in the CSM group. Moreover, medical costs were significantly higher in patients who experienced complications in both OPLL and CSM. The frequency of perioperative complications of OPLL and CSM in ADF was detailed using large real-world data. Compared to CSM, OPLL had more perioperative complications such as CSFL and SSI, and higher medical costs. Regardless of the disease, medical costs were significantly increased when perioperative complications occurred.

Impact of preoperative cervical sagittal alignment for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament on surgical treatment

BackgroundSurgical procedures for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) are often chosen based on OPLL size and cervical spine alignment. Recently, cervical sagittal alignment based on sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has received increased attention as an important determinant of radiological and clinical outcomes after surgery. This study aimed to investigate the impact of SVA-based cervical sagittal alignment on surgical treatment for cervical OPLL by reviewing a previous retrospective cohort in which its concept was not taken into account in the surgical procedure choices. MethodsWe reviewed a total of 96 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL from 2008 to 2014. We performed anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) or posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) on patients with massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment, and we performed laminoplasty (LAMP) on patients without massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment. CSVA (center of gravity of the head - C7 SVA), CL (C2-7 lordotic angle) and C7 slope were measured in cervical X-ray at standing position. Clinical results were evaluated using C-JOA score. We divided patients into two subgroups based on the preoperative CSVA: the Low-CSVA (CSVA <40 mm) and High-CSVA (CSVA ≥40 mm) subgroups. ResultsIn the Low-CSVA subgroup, none of the three operations had an effect on the CL. In contrast, in the High-CSVA subgroup, while ADF and PDF had no effect on the CL, LAMP worsened the CL postoperatively. The recovery rates of the C-JOA scores in the Low-CSVA subgroup showed no significant differences among the three operations; however in the High-CSVA subgroup, LAMP resulted in worse recovery rate of the C-JOA score than ADF or PDF. ConclusionsLAMP is not suitable for patients with cervical myelopathy caused by OPLL who have high CSVA alignment, even in cases without massive OPLL or kyphotic alignment.

Comparison of Perioperative Complications in Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database.

A retrospective cohort study with a national inpatient database. This study aimed to research the perioperative complication rates of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients who underwent anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) using a large national inpatient database and propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. There are several ways to successfully achieve surgical spinal decompression in CSM patients; however, evidence of the systemic complications and reoperation rates in ADF and PDF is lacking. We identified patients who were hospitalized for CSM and underwent either ADF or PDF from 2010 to 2016 using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database. In the ADF and PDF groups, we compared postoperative complications (systemic and local), medical costs during hospitalization, and mortality before and after PSM. In addition, multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for perioperative systemic complications. A total of 1013 matched pairs were made after PSM. More perioperative systemic complications were detected in the ADF group than in the PDF group (at least 1 complication: ADF vs. PDF: 15.2% vs. 12.0%, P=0.038), especially for respiratory failure (1.4% vs. 0.4%, P=0.018), pneumonia (1.9% vs. 0.5%, P=0.004), and dysphagia (3.0% vs. 1.1%, P=0.003). The costs were ~$8000 higher (P<0.001) and the length of hospital stay was almost 5 days longer (P<0.001) in the PDF group. The risk factors for perioperative systemic complications in ADF were high age, low body mass index, and preoperative respiratory disease, and the factors in PDF were high body mass index and preoperative renal disease. More systemic complications, especially respiratory events, were more frequently observed in the ADF group, while the medical costs were higher and the hospital stay was longer in the PDF group. Level III.

Comparison of perioperative complications in anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with fusion for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament -a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide inpatient database

BackgroundThoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL) is a rare disease, which can cause spinal cord compression leading to various neurological symptoms. There are limited treatment options for T-OPLL, surgery is generally considered the only effective treatment. However, few studies have investigated surgical complications in patients with T-OPLL, and there are no data regarding surgical risks in anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) when compared with posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) for T-OPLL. MethodsPatients who were diagnosed as T-OPLL and underwent ADF via the anterior approach and PDF via the posterior approach from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2018, were extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination (DPC) database. We analyzed perioperative systemic and local complication rates after ADF and PDF and compared them using propensity score matching (PSM) method. In each of the two groups, we investigated the details of length of stay, costs, mortality, and discharge destination. ResultsIn total 1344 patients (ADF: 88 patients, PDF: 1256 patients), 176 patients were investigated after PSM (88 pairs). While the incidence of overall systemic complication was significantly higher in the ADF group (ADF/PDF: 25.0%/8.0%, P = 0.002), there was no significant difference in the overall local complication rate (15.9%/19.3%, P = 0.55). Specifically, respiratory complications were more frequently observed in the ADF group (9.1%/0%, P = 0.004), however, other systemic and local complications did not differ significantly between the two groups. The length of stay was 1.7 times longer (P < 0.001) and the medical costs were 1.4 times higher (P < 0.001) in patients with perioperative complications, compared to those without perioperative complications. ConclusionWe demonstrated the perioperative complications of ADF and PDF in patients with T-OPLL using a large national database. ADF showed a higher incidence of respiratory complications. Development of perioperative complications was associated with longer hospital stay and higher medical costs.

Prospective Investigation of Postoperative Complications in Anterior Decompression with Fusion for Severe Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Multi-institutional Study.

A prospective multicenter study. This study aims to investigate the postoperative complications of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Surgical treatment for cervical OPLL has a high risk of various complications. ADF is reported to be effective for cervical OPLL, especially for massive OPLL. However, few studies have focused on the surgical complications of ADF. We prospectively included 102 patients undergoing ADF for severe cervical OPLL with average canal occupying ratio of 49.8%. We evaluated systemic and local complications, neurological complications, and risk factors related to the postoperative complications. Frequently observed complications included graft/ implant complications (18.6%), neurological complications (11.8%), and cerebrospinal fluid leak (11.8%). Motor palsy involving only the upper extremity was found in nine patients (8.8%), and other motor palsies involving the lower extremities were found in three patients (2.9%). None of the preoperative factors were significantly associated with the occurrence of neurological palsies, whereas the number of operated levels was a significant factor related to the postoperative graft/implant complications (P = 0.003; odds ratio, 2.112). The incidence of graft/implant complications and related reoperation increased as the number of operated levels increased (especially four levels or more). Most motor palsies were observed immediately after surgery. Of the motor palsies in the bilateral upper extremities and palsies involving the lower extremities, 85.7% showed good recovery, whereas only 40% of unilateral upper extremity motor palsies showed good recovery during the follow-up period. In ADF for cervical OPLL, the number of operated levels was a significant factor related to the postoperative complication. Specifically, the incidence of graft/implant complications and reoperation rate increased in ADF with four or more levels.Level of Evidence: 3.

Predictors of neurologic outcome after surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament differ based on myelopathy severity: a multicenter study.

The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study was to compare prognostic factors for neurological recovery in patients undergoing surgery for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) based on their presenting mild, moderate, or severe myelopathy. The study included 372 consecutive patients with OPLL who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy between 2006 and 2016 in East Asian countries with a high OPLL prevalence. Baseline and postoperative clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) myelopathy score and recovery ratio. Radiographic assessment included occupying ratio, cervical range of motion, and sagittal alignment parameters. Patient myelopathy was classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on the preoperative JOA score. Linear and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify patient and surgical factors associated with neurological recovery stratified by baseline myelopathy severity. The mean follow-up period was 45.4 months (range 25-140 months). The mean preoperative and postoperative JOA scores and recovery ratios for the total cohort were 11.7 ± 3.0, 14.5 ± 2.7, and 55.2% ± 39.3%, respectively. In patients with mild myelopathy, only age and diabetes correlated with recovery. In patients with moderate to severe myelopathy, older age and preoperative increased signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging were significantly correlated with a lower likelihood of recovery, while female sex and anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) were associated with better recovery. Various patient and surgical factors are correlated with likelihood of neurological recovery after surgical treatment for cervical OPLL, depending on the severity of presenting myelopathy. Older age, male sex, intramedullary high signal intensity, and posterior decompression are associated with less myelopathy improvement in patients with worse baseline function. Therefore, myelopathy-specific preoperative counseling regarding prognosis for postoperative long-term neurological improvement should include consideration of these individual and surgical factors.

A Prospective Cohort Study of Dysphagia After Subaxial Cervical Spine Surgery.

Prospective observational cohort study. To prospectively examine dysphagia after subaxial cervical spine surgery. Although dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery is common and well-studied, it has rarely been examined in posterior subaxial cervical spine surgery. This study analyzed 191 consecutive patients (132 male, 59 female; mean age, 64.9 yrs) who underwent subaxial cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease and completed 1 year of follow-up. Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) was performed in 87 patients, posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) in 21, and laminoplasty (LAMP) in 83. Dysphagia was evaluated by a self-administered questionnaire using the Bazaz dysphagia scale before, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Diagnosis, levels and number of operative segments, C2-7 lordotic angle (CL), O-C2 angle (OC2A), C2-7 range of motion (ROM), Japanese Orthopedic Association for cervical myelopathy (C-JOA) score, and neck pain visual analog scale (VAS) were examined. Thirty-two patients (16.8%) reported dysphagia before surgery. New dysphagia after surgery, defined as more than or equal to 1 grade worsening of the Bazaz score after surgery compared with the preoperative status, was observed in 38 patients (19.9%) at 6 months and 32 patients (16.8%) at 1 year. The incidence of new dysphagia at 1 year was 25.3% in the ADF group, 23.8% in the PDF group, and 6.0% in the LAMP group. Fusion surgery (ACDF or PDF) and increased CL after surgery were found as risk factors at 1 year in multivariate analysis; receiver operating characteristic analysis determined a postsurgical change in CL cutoff of 5°. Fusion surgery and increased CL after surgery were risk factors for development of dysphagia after subaxial cervical spine surgery. Cervical alignment change due to anterior and posterior fusion surgery can cause postoperative dysphagia.Level of Evidence: 3.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Laminoplasty, Anterior Decompression With Fusion, and Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Prospective multicenter study. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of laminoplasty (LAMP), anterior decompression with fusion (ADF), and posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM). Although ADF, LAMP, and PDF have been performed for DCM, little is known about the difference in impact of these surgical treatments on clinical and radiographic outcomes. We prospectively enrolled patients who were scheduled for surgery for DCM and compared the clinical and radiographic results of ADF, LAMP, and PDF. In total, 171 patients completed the 1-year follow-up. Regarding clinical outcomes, the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy (C-JOA score), European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores improved in all groups postoperatively. However, no significant differences were found in C-JOA, EQ-5D, and NDI scores and recovery rate among the groups. Regarding radiographic parameters, although the operation had no effect on cervical lordosis (CL) and the C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) in the ADF group, they worsened in the LAMP and PDF group. Although there were no significant differences in any preoperative radiographic parameters within the ADF and LAMP group, CL was significantly lower and the C2-7 SVA was significantly higher in the nonrecovery group within the PDF group. Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative lower CL was an independent risk factor for poor recovery in the PDF group. Although groups showed no significant differences in clinical outcomes, cervical alignment worsened after surgery in the LAMP and PDF groups. Within the PDF group, lower CL was an independent risk factor for poor recovery. Therefore, the indications for PDF in DCM patients with preoperative kyphotic alignment should be carefully considered. 3.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

BackgroundThe optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) remains controversial because there are few comprehensive studies that have investigated the surgical methods. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate evidence in the literature and to compare the surgical outcomes between anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty, which are representative procedures for CSM. MethodsAn extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies of ADF and laminoplasty for CSM. The language was restricted to English, and the publication period was from January 2001 to July 2019. We only included studies of CSM and excluded studies that involved patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and treatments with posterior instrumented fusion. We extracted outcomes from the studies, such as preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, cervical alignment, surgical complications and reoperation rates. Then, a meta-analysis was performed on these surgical outcomes. ResultsNine studies were obtained, and the quality of the studies was acceptable. In the meta-analysis, the preoperative JOA score was similar between the ADF and laminoplasty groups. The postoperative JOA scores and neurological recovery rates were not different between the ADF and laminoplasty groups. ADF exhibited more favorable results than laminoplasty in terms of postoperative cervical alignment. In contrast, overall complications were more frequently observed in the ADF group than in the laminoplasty group, leading to higher rates of reoperation. However, postoperative neck pain was more frequently observed in the laminoplasty group than in the ADF group. ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis showed both the merits and shortcomings of ADF and laminoplasty. ADF and laminoplasty showed similar results in terms of neurological recovery. Postoperative cervical lordosis was better preserved with ADF than with laminoplasty. However, ADF was associated with a higher incidence of surgical complications than laminoplasty.

Comparison of Perioperative Complications in Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Posterior Decompression With Fusion for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nation-Wide Inpatient Database.

A retrospective comparative study. To compare the perioperative complications and costs of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior decompression with fusion (PDF) for patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Surgical treatment of cervical OPLL has a high risk of various complications. ADF and PDF are effective for the treatment of cervical OPLL; however, few studies have compared the two procedures in terms of the perioperative surgical complications. Patients undergoing ADF and PDF for cervical OPLL from 2010 to 2016 were identified in a nation-wide inpatient database. We investigated systemic and local complications, length of hospital stay, costs for hospitalization, reoperation, and mortality. Propensity score was calculated from patients' characteristics and preoperative comorbidities, and one to one matching was performed. Propensity score-matching produced 854 pairs of patients who underwent ADF and PDF. The rate of at least one systemic complication was significantly higher in the ADF group (P = 0.004). The incidence rates of postoperative respiratory failure (P = 0.034) and dysphagia (P = 0.008) were significantly higher in the ADF group. The rates of pneumonia (P = 0.06) and hoarseness (P = 0.08) also tended to be higher in the ADF group. However, no difference was found in the mortality rate (P = 0.22). In the local complications, spinal fluid leakage was significantly higher in the ADF group (P < 0.001). However, blood transfusion rate was significantly higher in the PDF group (P = 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly longer in the PDF group (P < 0.001) and the cost for hospitalization was greater in the PDF group (P < 0.001). The present study demonstrated that perioperative complications, such as respiratory failure, dysphagia, and spinal fluid leakage, were more common in the ADF group. However, hospital stay was longer in the PDF group, and the cost for hospitalization was greater in the PDF group. 3.

Comparison of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy—A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) remains controversial. Recently, laminectomy/laminoplasty with instrumented fusion (LAMF) has been increasingly applied to treat CSM. However, few comprehensive studies have compared anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and LAMF. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the evidence in the literature and to compare the surgical outcomes between the 2 procedures. Since the surgical outcomes and risks differ between patients with CSM and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and between only posterior decompression and decompression with fusion treatments, we excluded patients with OPLL and patients with only posterior decompression in this review. MethodsAn extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies of ADF and LAMF for the treatment of CSM. The language was restricted to English, and the publication period was from January 2001 to July 2019. We only included studies about CSM and excluded studies that involved patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and with the treatment of posterior decompression without fusion. We extracted outcomes from the studies, such as preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores, neck disability index (NDI) scores, cervical alignment data, and surgical complications. Then, a meta-analysis was performed on these surgical outcomes. ResultsEleven studies were obtained, and the quality of the studies was acceptable. In the meta-analysis, the pre- and postoperative JOA scores were similar between the ADF and LAMF groups. The ADF group exhibited more favorable results than the LAMF group in terms of postoperative cervical alignment and the NDI. Overall complications were similar between the ADF and LAMF groups; however, C5 palsy was more frequently observed in the LAMF group than in the ADF group. ConclusionsWhile the ADF and LAMF groups demonstrated similar results in terms of neurological recovery, postoperative cervical lordosis and NDI scores were more favorable with ADF than with LAMF. The overall complication rate was similar between the ADF and LAMF groups. Surgeons should understand the merits and shortcomings of both procedures when deciding on a surgical procedure.

Comparison of the middle-term follow-up results between anterior decompression with fusion and posterior open-door laminoplasty for treatment of multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Objective To compare the medium-term clinical and radiologic outcomes between anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and posterior open-door laminoplasty (LAMP) in the treatment of multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM). Methods Data of 121 patients meeting to inclusion criteria from October 2011 to February 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were treated with ADF (ADF group, n=57) or LAMP (LAMP group, n=64) for MCSM. There were 39 males and 18 females in ADF group, aged from 35 to 77 years, with an average age of 58.8±10.1 years. And there were 64 cases in LAMP group, including 48 males and 16 females, aged from 28 to 82 years, with an average of 60.6±12.2 years. The operation time and blood loss were recorded. The clinical efficacy was evaluated by Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scores (JOA), improvement rate and visual analogue scale (VAS) before operation, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after operation and at the latest follow-up. At the same time, sagittal alignment of the C2-C7 lordotic angle and range of motion (ROM) in flexion and extension on plain X-rays was measured. Residual anterior compression to the spinal cord (ACS) in LAMP group on MRI was investigated. The incidence of complications such as axial symptoms and C5 nerve root paralysis were recorded. Results The average follow-up period was 25.6±3.8 months in ADF group and 27.3±4.1 months in LAMP group. Demographics were similar between the two groups. The mean JOA scores in ADF group increased from preoperative 8.25±2.33 to 14.62±3.15 at the latest follow-up, with an average recovery rate of 72.81%±11.32%. The mean JOA scores in LAMP group increased from preoperative 8.84±3.65 to 12.97±4.32 at the latest follow-up, with an average recovery rate of 66.54%±14.75%. The difference between two groups was statistically significant. Both of the VAS scores in the two groups decreased significantly at 1 month after the surgery, but the difference between the ADF group (1.92±0.75) and the LAMP group (2.78±0.68) was statistically significant (t=2.364, P=0.021). There was no significant difference in VAS score between the two groups at 3 months after operation. Cervical lordosis of ADF group increased from 15.3°±7.6° to 19.2°±5.7°, while that of LAMP group decreased from 16.8°±8.3° to 13.6°±4.3°. There was significant difference in cervical curvature between the two groups at the latest follow-up. Both two groups exhibited decreased cervical ROM, 15.2°±3.6° and 18.1°±4.1°, respectively, and the difference between two groups was statistically significant (t=3.392, P=0.000) . At the latest follow-up, the incidence of complication was 35.1% in ADF group and 20.3% in LAMP group, and the difference between two groups has no statistically significant. The LAMP group was divided into two subgroups: (1) ACS(+)(n=11) comprising patients who had ACS after surgery, and (2) ACS(-) (n=53) comprising patients without ACS. At the latest follow-up, the average JOA score of patients with anterior residual compression of spinal cord was 10.85±5.46, while the average JOA score of patients without anterior residual compression of spinal cord was 14.18±4.52. The recovery rate differed significantly between the ACS(+) and ACS(-) groups, 40.52%±9.76% and 70.38%±10.52%, respectively. Also at the latest follow-up, the cervical curvature, ROM and ROM loss angle were 10.2°±7.3°, 15.6°±6.7° and 11.8°±8.3° in the group with anterior residual compression of spinal cord, respectively. The groups without anterior residual compression of spinal cord were 15.8°±6.5°, 20.4°±10.2° and 8.8°±6.8°, respectively. Conclusion Both ADF and LAMP groups provided good outcomes at 2-year time-point whereas ADF could achieve more satisfactory outcomes and better sagittal alignment at the middle-term. ADF can remove the compression directly, maintain the curvature of cervical vertebra effectively and restore the nerve function well. The clinical outcomes after LAMP could be influenced by ACS, due to the reduction of cervical curvature and the decrease of cervical range of motion. Key words: Cervical vertebrae; Spinal cord compression; Spinal fusion

A novel concept of posterior decompression and instrumented fusion with selective lordotic correction for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

PurposeThe recovery rate of Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score with K-line (−) cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) for posterior decompression with in-situ fusion (PDF) tends to be lower than that of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF). However, ADF is a technically demanding operation and has ADF-specific complications. This prospective report introduced a novel concept of PDF with selective lordotic correction as well as prophylactic foraminal decompression. MethodsSix consecutive patients (four men and two women; mean age, 61.8 years) were included. PDF was performed, attempting to create cervical lordosis to acquire a posterior shift of the spinal cord, while preventing postoperative C5 palsy by prophylactic facetectomy and selective lordotic correction. ResultsThe mean recovery rate of JOA score at the final follow-up was 70.9 ± 20.3%. The mean C2–C7 angle preoperatively and at final follow-up was 5.5 ± 3.9° and 12.2 ± 4.8°, respectively. No symptomatic nerve root palsy, except one case with transient C7 root iatrogenic palsy, was found. ConclusionsA novel concept of PDF with selective lordotic correction obtained recovery rates of JOA scores comparable to those of ADF. We believe that this method can improve PDF outcomes in patients with K-line (−) OPLL.

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

BackgroundThe optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial because there are few comprehensive studies investigating the surgical methods. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate evidence in the literature and compare the surgical outcomes of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP), which are representative procedures for cervical OPLL. MethodsAn extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies of ADF and LAMP for cervical OPLL. The language was restricted to English, and the year of publication was from January 1980 to December 2018. We extracted outcomes from the studies, such as preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, cervical alignment, surgical complications and reoperation rate. Then, meta-analysis was performed for these surgical outcomes. ResultsTwelve studies were obtained, including 1 prospective cohort study and 11 retrospective cohort studies. In the meta-analysis, neurological recovery rate in JOA score was greater in ADF than in LAMP, especially in patients with a large canal occupying ratio (≥60%) and preoperative kyphotic alignment. ADF also exhibited more favorable results in postoperative cervical alignment. In contrast, operating time and intraoperative blood loss were greater in ADF. Surgical complications were more frequently seen in ADF, leading to higher rates of reoperation. ConclusionsThis systematic review and meta-analysis showed both the merits and shortcomings of ADF and LAMP. ADF resulted in more favorable neurological recovery compared to LAMP, especially for patients with massive OPLL and kyphotic alignment. Postoperative cervical lordosis was also better preserved in ADF. However, ADF was associated with greater surgical invasion and higher incidences of surgical complications.

Perioperative complications of anterior decompression with fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: propensity score matching analysis using a nation-wide inpatient database

BACKGROUND CONTEXTSurgical treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) has a high risk of various complications. Anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP) are the most representative surgical procedures. However, few studies have compared the two procedures in terms of perioperative surgical complications. PURPOSETo compare the perioperative complications post-ADF and LAMP for cervical OPLL using a large national inpatient database. STUDY DESIGNA retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching analysis. PATIENT SAMPLEOverall, 8,718 (ADF/LAMP:1,333/7,485) patients who underwent surgery for cervical OPLL from April 1, 2010 to March 31, 2016 in hospitals using the diagnosis procedure combination were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASURESThe occurrence of postoperative complications during hospitalization. METHODSWe compared the perioperative systemic and local complications, reoperation rates, and costs between ADF and LAMP using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTSOne-to-one matching resulted in 1,192 pairs of patients who underwent ADF and LAMP. The postoperative cardiovascular event rate was significantly higher (ADF/LAMP=1.9/0.8%, p=.013) in the ADF group. The incidence rates of dysphagia (similarly, 2.4/0.2%, p<.001), pneumonia (1.0/0.3%, p=.045), and spinal fluid leakage (2.4/0.4%, p<.001) were also higher in the ADF group, even after matching. The costs were also higher in the ADF group. However, surgical site infection (2.0/3.4%, p=.033) was significantly lower in the ADF group. No significant difference in the reoperation rates was found between the groups. CONCLUSIONThe present study, using a large nationwide database, demonstrated that perioperative complications were more common in the ADF group, but that surgical site infection (SSI) was more frequently observed in the LAMP group.

Anterior decompression with fusion versus posterior decompression with fusion for massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio: a multicenter retrospective study

Background ContextPrevious studies have shown that compared with laminoplasty, anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) is superior for postoperative neurologic improvement in patients with massive cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio. However, it is unknown which method, ADF or posterior decompression with fusion (PDF), is more effective for the treatment of massive OPLL. PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the surgical outcomes of ADF and PDF for the treatment of massive OPLL. Study DesignA multicenter retrospective case-control study was carried out. Patient SampleA total of 61 OPLL patients with a ≥50% canal occupying ratio were included in this study. The mean age of the patients was 60.9 years (49 males and 12 females); 39 patients (31 males and 8 females, average age 61.1 years) underwent ADF, and 22 patients underwent PDF (18 males and 4 females, average age 60.6 years). Outcome MeasuresThe data collected from both groups included age, gender, neurologic symptoms evaluated based on the Japanese Orthopedic Association score, neck pain assessed using the visual analogue scale, and radiographic parameters, including cervical lordosis and the OPLL canal occupying ratio. MethodsClinical and radiological outcomes were compared between the ADF and PDF groups with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. ResultsThere were no significant differences in the postoperative neurologic recovery rate between the two groups. However, in patients with kyphotic alignment (C2–C7 angle <0 degrees), the recovery rate was higher in the ADF group. Postoperative cervical pain was greater in the PDF group. The improvement in cervical alignment at C2–C7 was greater in the ADF group. The operating time was longer in the ADF group, whereas the intraoperative blood loss was greater in the PDF group. Approach-related complications were more frequently observed in the ADF group than in the PDF group. ConclusionsThe present study demonstrated that the postoperative recovery rate was similar in the ADF and PDF group. In patients with massive OPLL with kyphotic alignment, neurologic recovery rate in the ADF was superior to that in the PDF (in situ fusion). Additionally, postoperative neck pain was less severe in the ADF group. However, the occurrence of perioperative complications was more common in the ADF group.