Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Force Research Articles

Supratubercle Anterior Closing Wedge Osteotomy: No Changes in Patellar Height and Significant Decreases in Anterior Tibial Translation at 6 Months Postoperatively.

Because of the increased prevalence of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there has been a desire to understand the role of posterior tibial slope on increased anterior tibial translation and increased ACL graft forces. One potential concern in supratubercle anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (ACW-PTO) for decreasing the posterior tibial slope is the risk of altering the patellar height. To radiographically assess changes in (1) patellar height, (2) anterior tibial translation, and (3) posterior tibial slope after supratubercle ACW-PTO. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Patients who underwent supratubercle ACW-PTO by a single surgeon between July 2019 and June 2023 were included. Standardized lateral knee weightbearing radiographs to assess patellar height (via the Caton-Deschamps index), anterior tibial translation of the lateral tibial plateau relative to the lateral femoral condyle, and posterior tibial slope were obtained at 4 time points (preoperatively and 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively). Paired t test was used to compare differences between preoperative, 1-day, and 3- and 6-month values for patellar height as measured using the Caton-Deschamps index and for posterior tibial slope. Paired t test was also used to compare differences in the preoperative and 6-month postoperative values for anterior tibial translation. In 20 patients after ACW-PTO, the Caton-Deschamps index demonstrated a significant increase in patellar height on postoperative day 1 (P < .001) but no significant differences at 3 (P = .057) and 6 (P = .176) months postoperatively. Anterior tibial translation on standing lateral knee radiographs was significantly decreased by a mean of 8.9 mm from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively (P < .001). Posterior tibial slope was significantly decreased by a mean of 11.2° from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively (P < .001). Supratubercle ACW-PTO performed for ACL reconstruction failure in the setting of an increased posterior tibial slope did not induce significant changes in patellar height postoperatively. Furthermore, after ACW-PTO, there was a significant decrease in anterior tibial translation and posterior tibial slope.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis With Knotless Anchor Fixation

Recent studies have reported the biomechanical and clinical advantages of lateral extraarticular augmentation procedures including the modified lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. LET has been shown to significantly decrease re-rupture rates in high-risk patients and decrease anterior cruciate ligament graft forces during pivoting loads and instrumented anterior laxity testing. Many variations of the modified LET approaches have been described. However, concerns including lateral hematoma, wound-healing complications, and increased operative time exist. This minimally invasive, arthroscopic-assisted approach using a knotless, all-suture anchor allows for direct visualization through a 2-cm incision and inherently decreases the morbidity associated with traditional LET techniques.

Biomechanical Analysis of Tibial Motion and ACL Graft Forces After ACLR With and Without LET at Varying Tibial Slopes.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being performed more frequently with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) to decrease graft failure rates. The posterior tibial slope (PTS) affects ACL graft failure rates. The effect of ACLR + LET on tibial motion and graft forces with increasing PTS has not been elucidated. LET would decrease anterior tibial translation (ATT), tibial rotation, and ACL graft force versus ACLR alone with increasing tibial slope throughout knee range of motion. Controlled laboratory study. Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (mean donor age, 40.5 years; all female) were tested in 4 conditions (intact, ACL cut, ACLR, and ACLR + LET) with varying PTSs (5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) at 3 flexion angles (0°, 30°, and 60°). Specimens were mounted to a load frame that applied a 500-N axial load with 1 N·m of internal rotation (IR) torque. The amount of tibial translation, IR, and graft force was measured. Increasing PTS revealed a linear and significant increase in graft force at all flexion angles. LET reduced graft force by 8.3% (-5.8 N) compared with ACLR alone at 30° of flexion. At the same position, slope reduction resulted in reduced graft force by 17% to 22% (-12.3 to -15.2 N) per 5° of slope correction, with a 46% (-40.7 N) reduction seen from 20° to 5° of slope correction. For ATT, ACLR returned tibial translation to preinjury levels, as did ACLR + LET at all flexion angles, except full extension, where ACLR + LET reduced ATT by 2.5 mm compared with the intact state (P = .019). Increased PTS was confirmed to increase graft forces linearly. Although ACLR + LET reduced graft force compared with ACLR alone, slope reduction had a larger effect across all testing conditions. No other clinically significant differences were noted between ACLR with versus without LET in regard to graft force, ATT, or IR. Many authors have proposed LET in the setting of ACLR, revision surgery, hyperlaxity, high-grade pivot shift, and elevated PTS, but the indications remain unclear. The biomechanical performance of ACLR + LET at varying PTSs may affect daily practice and provide clarity on these indications.

In situ repair of segmental loss posterior lateral meniscal root tears outperforms meniscofemoral ligament imbrication in the ACL reconstructed knee

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical effect of in-situ repair of posterior lateral meniscal root (PLMR) tear with segmental meniscal loss, with and without meniscofemoral ligament (MFL) imbrication, on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft force and knee joint kinematics.MethodsTen fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens underwent kinematic evaluation in five states: 1) Native, 2) ACLR, 3) Segmental PLMR loss, 4) In-situ PLMR repair, and 5) MFL augmentation. Kinematic evaluation consisted of five tests, each performed at full extension and at 30° of flexion: 1) Anterior drawer, 2) Internal Rotation, 3) External Rotation, 4) Varus, and 5) Valgus. Additionally, a simulated pivot shift test was performed. Knee kinematics and ACL graft force were measured.ResultsPLMR tear did not significantly increase ACL graft force in any test. However, PLMR repair significantly reduced ACL graft force compared to the ACLR alone (over constraint -26.6 N, p = 0.001). PLMR tear significantly increased ATT during the pivot shift test (+ 2.7 mm, p = 0.0001), and PLMR repair restored native laxity. MFL augmentation did not improve the mechanics.ConclusionsIn-situ PLMR repair eliminated pivot shift laxity through ATT and reduced force on the ACL graft, indicating that this procedure may be ACL graft-protective. MFL augmentation was not shown to have any effect on graft force or knee kinematics and untreated PLMR tears may place an ACL graft at higher risk. This study suggests concomitant repair to minimize additional forces on the ACL graft.

Anterior cruciate ligament graft forces are sensitive to fixation angle and tunnel position within the native femoral footprint during passive flexion

BackgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft position within the anatomic femoral footprint of the native ACL and the flexion angle at which the graft is fixed (i.e., fixation angle) are important considerations in ACL reconstruction surgery. However, their combined effect on ACL graft force remains less well understood. HypothesisDuring passive flexion, grafts placed high within the femoral footprint carry lower forces than grafts placed low within the femoral footprint (i.e., high and low grafts, respectively). Forces carried by high grafts are independent of fixation angle. All reconstructions impart higher forces on the graft than those carried by the native ACL. Study DesignControlled laboratory study. MethodsFive fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted to a robotic manipulator and flexed from full extension to 90° of flexion. The ACL was sectioned and ACL force was calculated via superposition. ACL reconstructions were then performed using a patellar tendon autograft. For each knee, four different reconstruction permutations were tested: high and low femoral graft positions fixed at 15° and at 30° of flexion. Graft forces were calculated from full extension to 90° of flexion for each combination of femoral graft position and fixation angle again via superposition. Native ACL and ACL graft forces were compared through early flexion (by averaging tissue force from 0 to 30° of flexion) and in 5° increments from full extension to 90° of flexion. ResultsWhen fixed at 30° of flexion, high grafts carried less force than low grafts through early flexion bearing a respective 64 ± 19 N and 88 ± 11 N (p = 0.02). Increasing fixation angle from 15° to 30° caused graft forces through early flexion to increase 40 ± 13 N in low grafts and 23 ± 6 N in high grafts (p < 0.001). Low grafts fixed at 30° of flexion differed most from the native ACL, carrying 67 ± 9 N more force through early flexion (p < 0.001). ConclusionACL grafts placed high within the femoral footprint and fixed at a lower flexion angle carried less force through passive flexion compared to grafts placed lower within the femoral footprint and fixed at a higher flexion angle. At the prescribed pretensions, all grafts carried higher forces than the native ACL through passive flexion. Clinical RelevanceBoth fixation angle and femoral graft location within the anatomic ACL footprint influence graft forces and, therefore, should be considered when performing ACL reconstruction.

Effect of Slope and Varus Correction High Tibial Osteotomy in the ACL-Deficient and ACL-Reconstructed Knee on Kinematics and ACL Graft Force: A Biomechanical Analysis

Background: Correction of high posterior tibial slope is an important treatment option for revision of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) failure as seen in clinical and biomechanical studies. In cases with moderate to severe medial compartment arthritis, an additional varus correction osteotomy may be added to improve alignment. Purpose: To investigate the influence of coronal and sagittal correction high tibial osteotomy in ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed knees on knee kinematics and ACL graft load. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knees were selected according to previous computed tomography measurements with increased native slope and slight varus tibial alignment (mean ± SD): slope, 9.9°± 1.4°; medial proximal tibia angle, 86.5°± 2.1°; age, 47.7 ± 5.8 years. A 10° anterior closing-wedge osteotomy, as well as an additional 5° of simulated varus correction osteotomy, were created and fixed using an external fixator. Four alignment conditions—native, varus correction, slope correction, and combined varus and slope correction—were randomly tested in 2 states: ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed. Compressive axial loads were applied to the tibia while mounted on a free-moving X-Y table and free-rotating tibia in a knee testing fixture. Three-dimensional motion tracking captured anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation. Change of tensile forces on the reconstructed ACL graft were recorded. Results: In the ACL-deficient knee, an isolated varus correction led to a significant increase of ATT by 4.3 ± 4.0 mm (P = .04). Isolated slope reduction resulted in the greatest decrease of ATT by 6.2 ± 4.3 mm (P < .001). In the ACL-reconstructed knee, ATT showed comparable changes, while combined varus and slope correction led to lower ATT by 3.7 ± 2.6 mm (P = .01) than ATT in the native alignment. Internal tibial rotation was not significantly altered by varus correction but significantly increased after isolated slope correction by 4.0°± 4.1° (P < .01). Each isolated or combined osteotomy showed decreased forces on the graft as compared with the native state. The combined varus and slope osteotomy led to a mean decrease of ACL graft force by 33% at 200 N and by 58% at 400 N as compared with the native condition (P < .001). Conclusion: A combined varus and slope correction led to a relevant decrease of ATT in the ACL-deficient and ACL-reconstructed cadaveric knee. ACL graft forces were significantly decreased after combined varus and slope correction. Thus, our biomechanical findings support the treatment goal of a perpendicular-aligned tibial plateau for ACL insufficiencies, especially in cases of revision surgery. Clinical Relevance: This study shows the beneficial knee kinematics and reduced forces on the ACL graft after combined varus and slope correction.

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Force and Anterior Tibial Translation in Response to Applied Pivoting and Anterior Drawer Loads

Background: The biomechanical effect of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) performed in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) on load sharing between the ACL graft and the LET and on knee kinematics is not clear. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to quantify the effect of LET on (1) forces carried by both the ACL graft and the LET and (2) tibiofemoral kinematics in response to simulated pivot shift and anterior laxity tests. We hypothesized that LET would decrease forces carried by the ACL graft and anterior tibial translation (ATT) in response to simulated pivoting maneuvers and during simulated tests of anterior laxity. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Seven cadaveric knees (mean age, 39 ± 12 years [range, 28-54 years]; 4 male) were mounted to a robotic manipulator. The robot simulated clinical pivoting maneuvers and tests of anterior laxity: namely, the Lachman and anterior drawer tests. Each knee was assessed in the following states: ACL intact, ACL sectioned, ACL reconstructed (using a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft), and after performing LET (the modified Lemaire technique after sectioning of the anterolateral ligament and Kaplan fibers). Resultant forces carried by the ACL graft and LET at the peak applied loads were determined via superposition. ATT was determined in response to the applied loads. Results: With the applied pivoting loads, performing LET decreased ACL graft force up to 80% (44 ± 12 N; P < .001) and decreased ATT of the lateral compartment compared with that of the intact knee up to 7.6 ± 2.9 mm (P < .001). The LET carried up to 91% of the force generated in the ACL graft during isolated ACLR (without LET). For simulated tests of anterior laxity, performing LET decreased ACL graft force by 70% (40 ± 20 N; P = .001) for the anterior drawer test with no significant difference detected for the Lachman test. No differences in ATT were deteced between ACLR with LET and the intact knee on both the Lachman and the anterior drawer tests (P = .409). LET reduced ATT compared with isolated ACLR on the simulated anterior drawer test by 2.4 ± 1.8 mm (P = .032) but not on the simulated Lachman test. Conclusion: In a cadaveric model, LET in combination with ACLR transferred loads from the ACL graft to the LET and reduced ATT with applied pivoting loads and during the simulated anterior drawer test. The effect of LET on ACL graft force and ATT was less pronounced on the simulated Lachman test. Clinical Relevance: LET in addition to ACLR may be a suitable option to offload the ACL graft and to reduce ATT in the lateral compartment to magnitudes less than that of the intact knee with clinical pivoting maneuvers. In contrast, LET did not offload the ACL graft or add to the anterior restraint provided by the ACL graft during the Lachman test.

Tibial Slope and Its Effect on Force in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts: Anterior Cruciate Ligament Force Increases Linearly as Posterior Tibial Slope Increases

Background: Previous work has reported that increased tibial slope is directly correlated with increased anterior tibial translation, possibly predisposing patients to higher rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and causing higher rates of ACL graft failures over the long term. However, the effect of changes in sagittal plane tibial slope on ACL reconstruction (ACLR) graft force has not been well defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of changes in sagittal plane tibial slope on ACLR graft force at varying knee flexion angles. Our null hypothesis was that changing the sagittal plane tibial slope would not affect force on the ACL graft. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten male fresh-frozen cadaveric knees had a posterior tibial osteotomy performed and an external fixator placed for testing and accurate slope adjustment. Following ACLR, specimens were compressed with a 200-N axial load at flexion angles of 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°, and the graft loads were recorded through a force transducer clamped to the graft. Tibial slope was varied between −2° and 20° of posterior slope at 2° increments under these test conditions. Results: ACL graft force in the loaded testing state increased linearly as slope increased. This effect was independent of flexion angle. The final model utilized a 2-factor linear mixed-effects regression model and noted a significant, highly positive, and linear relationship between tibial slope and ACL graft force in axially loaded knees at all flexion angles tested (slope coefficient = 0.92, SE = 0.08, P < .001). Significantly higher graft force was also observed at 0° of flexion as compared with all other flexion angles for the loaded condition (all P < .001). Conclusion: The authors found that tibial slope had a strong linear relationship to the amount of graft force experienced by an ACL graft in axially loaded knees. Thus, a flatter tibial slope had significantly less loading of ACL grafts, while steeper slopes increased ACL graft loading. Our biomechanical findings support recent clinical evidence of increased ACL graft failure with steeper tibial slope secondary to increased graft loading. Clinical Relevance: Evaluation of the effect of increasing tibial slope on ACL graft force can guide surgeons when deciding if a slope-decreasing proximal tibial osteotomy should be performed before a revision ACLR. Overall, as slope increases, ACL graft force increases, and in our study, flatter slopes had lower ACL graft forces and were protective of the ACLR graft.

Lateral Meniscal Posterior Root Repair With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Better Restores Knee Stability

Background: The effect of lateral meniscal posterior root tear and repair—commonly seen in clinical practice in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction—is not known. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study evaluated the effect of tear and repair of the lateral meniscal posterior root on the biomechanics of the ACL-reconstructed knee. It was hypothesized that anterior tibial translation would increase under anterior loading and simulated pivot-shift loading with the root tear of the posterior lateral meniscus, while repair of the root tear would reduce it close to the noninjured state. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Thirteen fresh-frozen adult human knees were tested with a robotic testing system under 2 loading conditions: (1) an 89.0-N anterior tibial load applied at full extension and 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion and (2) a combined 7.0-N·m valgus and 5.0-N·m internal tibial torque (simulated pivot-shift test) applied at full extension and 15° and 30° of knee flexion. The following knee states were tested: intact knee, ACL reconstruction and intact lateral meniscus, ACL reconstruction and lateral meniscal posterior root tear, and ACL reconstruction and lateral meniscal posterior root repair. Results: In the ACL-reconstructed knee, a tear of the lateral meniscal posterior root significantly increased knee laxity under anterior loading by as much as 1 mm. The transosseous pullout suture root repair improved knee stability under anterior tibial and simulated pivot-shift loading. Root repair improved the ACL graft force closer to that of the native ACL under anterior tibial loading. Conclusion: Lateral meniscal posterior root injury further destabilizes the ACL-reconstructed knee, and root repair improves knee stability. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests a rationale for surgical repair of the lateral meniscus, which can restore stability close to that of the premeniscal injury state.

The Effect of an ACL Reconstruction in Controlling Rotational Knee Stability in Knees with Intact and Physiologic Laxity of Secondary Restraints as Defined by Tibiofemoral Compartment Translations and Graft Forces.

The effect of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction on restoring normal knee kinematics in unstable knees with physiologic laxity of secondary ligamentous restraints remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the stabilizing function of an ACL reconstruction and the resulting ACL graft forces in knees with severely abnormal anterior subluxation due to associated laxity of secondary restraints. A 6-degree-of-freedom robotic simulator was used to test 21 cadaveric knees studied as a whole and in subgroups of lax secondary restraints (Lax-SR) and intact secondary restraints (Intact-SR), based on abnormal translations and tibial rotations. Native, ACL-sectioned, and ACL-reconstructed conditions were tested. An instrumented bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft measured ACL graft forces. The loading profile involved the Lachman test (25° of flexion and 100-N anterior load), anterior tibial loading (100-N anterior load across 10° to 90° of flexion), internal rotation (25° of flexion and 5-Nm torque), and 2 pivot-shift simulations (100-N anterior load, 7-Nm valgus, and either 5 Nm of internal rotation [Pivot Shift 1] or 1 Nm of internal rotation [Pivot Shift 2]). Equivalence between conditions was defined as being within 2 mm for compartment translation and within 2° for internal tibial rotation, with p < 0.05. ACL sectioning increased center translation in the Lachman test by a mean of 10.9 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3 to 12.5 mm; p = 0.99), which was equivalent to native values after ACL reconstruction in all knees (mean difference, 0.0 mm [95% CI, -0.4 to 0.4 mm]; p = 0.0013), and in subgroups of Lax-SR (mean difference, 0.2 mm [95% CI, -0.5 to 0.8 mm]; p = 0.03) and Intact-SR (mean difference, -0.2 mm [95% CI, -0.8 to 0.4 mm]; p = 0.002). ACL sectioning in the pivot-shift (5-Nm) test increased lateral compartment translation to non-native-equivalent levels, which were restored to native-equivalent values after ACL reconstruction in all knees (mean difference, 0.9 mm [95% CI, 0.4 to 1.4 mm]; p = 0.055), in the Intact-SR subgroup (mean difference, 1.1 mm [95% CI, 0.5 to 1.8 mm]; p = 0.03), and to nearly native-equivalence in the Lax-SR subgroup (mean difference, 0.6 mm [95% CI, -0.3 to 1.6 mm; p = 0.06). The highest ACL graft force reached a mean of 190.9 N in the pivot-shift (5-Nm) test. The ACL reconstruction restored native kinematics and native rotational stability in all knees, including knees having laxity of secondary ligamentous restraints and clinically equivalent Grade-3 pivot-shift subluxation, and did so at ACL graft forces that were not excessive. An ACL reconstruction with a BPTB graft restored normal stability parameters regardless of the integrity of secondary ligamentous restraints.

Effect of Dynamic Changes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament In Situ Graft Force on the Biological Healing Response of the Graft-Tunnel Interface

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts that are placed for reconstruction are subject to complex forces. Current “anatomic” ACL reconstruction techniques may result in greater in situ graft forces. The biological effect of changing magnitudes of ACL graft force on graft-tunnel osseointegration is not well understood. Purpose: The research objective is to determine how mechanical force on the ACL graft during knee motion affects tendon healing in the tunnel. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Male rats (N = 120) underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction with a soft tissue flexor tendon autograft. ACL graft force was modulated by different femoral tunnel positions at the time of surgery to create different graft force patterns with knee motion. External fixators were used to eliminate graft load during cage activity. A custom knee flexion device was used to deliver graft load through controlled daily knee motion. Graft-tunnel healing was then assessed via biomechanical, micro–computed tomography, and histological analyses. Results: ACL graft-tunnel healing was sensitive to dynamic changes in graft forces with postoperative knee motion. High ACL graft force with joint motion resulted in early inferior ACL graft load to failure as compared with knees that had low-force ACL grafts and joint motion and knees that were immobilized (mean ± SD: 5.50 ± 2.30 N vs 9.91 ± 3.54 N [P = .013] and 10.90 ± 2.8 N [P = .001], respectively). Greater femoral bone volume fraction was seen in immobilized knees and knees with low-force ACL grafts when compared with high-force ACL grafts at 3 and 6 weeks. Conclusion: The authors were able to demonstrate that ACL graft-tunnel incorporation is sensitive to dynamic changes in ACL graft force with joint motion. Early high forces on the ACL graft appear to impair graft-tunnel osseointegration. Clinical Relevance: Current “anatomic” techniques of ACL reconstruction may result in greater graft excursion and force with knee motion. Our results suggest that the postoperative rehabilitation regimen may need to be modified during the early phase of healing to protect the reconstruction.

Is an Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Required in ACL-Reconstructed Knees With Associated Injury to the Anterolateral Structures? A Robotic Analysis of Rotational Knee Stability

Background: The effect of an anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction on rotational knee stability and corresponding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft forces using multiple knee loading conditions including the pivot-shift phenomenon has not been determined. Purpose: First, to determine the rotational stability and ACL graft forces provided by an anatomic bone–patellar tendon–bone ACL reconstruction in the ACL-deficient knee alone and with an associated ALL/iliotibial band (ITB) injury. Second, to determine the added rotational stabilizing effect and reduction in ACL graft forces provided by an ALL reconstruction. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A 6 degrees of freedom robotic simulator was used to test 7 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens during 5 testing conditions: intact, ACL-sectioned, ACL-reconstructed, ALL/ITB-sectioned, and ALL-reconstructed. Lateral and medial tibiofemoral compartment translations and internal tibial rotations were measured under Lachman test conditions, 5-N·m internal rotation, and 2 pivot-shift simulations. Statistical equivalence within 2 mm and 2° was defined as P < .05. Results: Single-graft ACL reconstruction restored central tibial translation under Lachman testing and internal rotation under 5-N·m internal rotation torque (P < .05). A modest increase in internal rotation under 5-N·m internal rotation torque occurred after ALL/ITB sectioning of 5.1° (95% CI, 3.6° to 6.7°) and 6.7° (95% CI, 4.3° to 9.1°) at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively (P = .99). Lateral compartment translation increases in the pivot-shift tests were <2 mm. ALL reconstruction restored internal rotation within 0.5° (95% CI, –1.9° to 2.9°) and 0.7° (95% CI, –2.0° to 3.4°) of the ACL-reconstructed state at 60° and 90° of flexion, respectively (P < .05). The ALL procedure reduced ACL graft forces, at most, 75 N in the pivot-shift tests and 81 N in the internal rotation tests. Conclusion: Although the ALL reconstruction corrected the small abnormal changes in the internal rotation limit at high flexion angles, the procedure had no effect in limiting tibiofemoral compartment translations in the pivot-shift test and produced only modest decreases in ACL graft forces. Accordingly, the recommendation to perform an ALL reconstruction to correct pivot-shift abnormalities is questioned. Clinical Relevance: The small changes in rotational stability after ALL/ITB sectioning would not seem to warrant the routine addition of an ALL reconstruction in primary ACL injuries. Clinical exceptions may exist, as in grossly unstable grade 3 pivot-shift knees and revision knees. However, the concern exists of overconstraining normal tibial rotations.

A Novel Small Animal Model of Differential Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Strain

The aim of the study was to establish a small animal research model of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction where ACL graft force can be predictably altered with knee motion. Cadaveric rat knees (n = 12) underwent ACL resection followed by reconstruction. Six knees received anterior (high-tension) femoral graft tunnels and six knees received posterior (isometric) graft tunnels. All the 12 knees and ACL grafts were pretensioned to 3 N at 15 or 45 degrees of knee flexion. ACL graft force (N) was recorded as the knee was ranged from extension to 90-degree flexion. Distinct ACL graft force patterns were generated for a high-tension and isometric femoral graft tunnels. For a high-tension femoral tunnel, the rat ACL graft remained relatively isometric at lower knee flexion angles but increased as the knee was flexed beyond 45 degrees. At 90 degrees, high-tension grafts had significantly greater mean graft tension for both pretensioning at 15 degrees (5.58 ± 1.34 N, p = 0.005) and 45 degrees (6.35 ± 1.24 N, p = 0.001). In contrast, the graft forces for isometric ACL grafts remained relatively constant with knee flexion. Compared with a high-tension ACL grafts, the graft force for grafts placed in an isometric tunnel had significantly lower ACL graft forces at 60, 75, and 90 degrees of knee flexion for both pretensioning at 15 and 45 degrees, respectively. We were able to demonstrate that ACL graft forces in our rat model of ACL reconstruction were sensitive to femoral tunnel position similar to human knees. We were also able to establish two reproducible femoral graft tunnel positions in this small animal model, which yielded significantly different ACL graft tension patterns with knee range of motion. This model would permit further research on how ACL graft tension may affect graft healing.

The effect of isolated popliteus tendon complex injury on graft force in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees

Failure to diagnose injury to the posterolateral structures has been found to increase the forces experienced by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and ACL grafts which may cause their subsequent failure. An isolated injury to the popliteus complex (PC) consisting of the popliteus tendon and popliteofibular ligament is not uncommon. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to discover if an isolated injury to the PC can significantly affect the forces experienced by the ACL graft under external loading conditions. We hypothesised that, under external tibial torque, the ACL graft will experience a significant increase in force, in knees with PC injury compared to the intact PC condition. Under varus tibial torque (10Nm), we observed minimal changes in the varus tibial rotation due to isolated sectioning of the PC in an ACL reconstructed knee (P > 0.05). Consequently, no significant increase in the ACL graft force was observed under varus tibial torque. In contrast, sectioning the PC resulted in a significant increase in the external tibial rotation compared to the intact PC knee condition under the external rotational tibial torque (5Nm) at all flexion angles (P < 0.05). These changes in kinematics under external tibial torque were manifested as elevated ACL graft forces at all selected flexion angles (P < 0.05). Prompt diagnosis of isolated PC injury and its treatment are warranted to prevent potential failure of ACL reconstruction.

Comparison of the ACL and ACL graft forces before and after ACL reconstruction an in-vitro robotic investigation

Background Long-term follow-up studies have indi-cated that there is an increased incidence of arthrosis following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruc-tion, suggesting that the reconstruction may not repro-duce intact ACL biomechanics. We studied not only the magnitude but also the orientation of the ACL and ACL graft forcesMethods 10 knee specimens were tested on a robotic testing system with the ACL intact, deficient, and recon-structed (using a bone-patella tendon-bone graft). The magnitude and orientation of the ACL and ACL graft forces were determined under an anterior tibial load of 130 N at full extension, and 15, 30, 60, and 90° of flexion. Orientation was described using elevation angle (the angle formed with the tibial plateau in the sagit-tal plane) and deviation angle (the angle formed with respect to the anteroposterior direction in the transverse plane)Results ACL reconstruction restored anterior tibial translation to within 2.6 mm of that of the intact knee under the 130-N anterior load. Average internal tibial rotation was reduced after ACL reconstruction at all flexion angles. The force vector of the ACL graft was significantly different from the ACL force vector. The average values of the elevation and deviation angles of the ACL graft forces were higher than that of the intact ACL at all flexion anglesInterpretation Contemporary single bundle ACL reconstruction restores anterior tibial translation under anterior tibial load with different forces (both magni-tude and orientation) in the graft compared to the intact ACL. Such graft function might alter knee kinematics in other degrees of freedom and could overly constrain the tibial rotation. An anatomic ACL reconstruction should reproduce the magnitude and orientation of the intact ACL force vector, so that the 6-degrees-of-freedom knee kinematics and joint reaction forces can be restored.

Twist and its effect on ACL graft forces

Graft tension is a controversial topic in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery. Evidence suggests a narrow range of graft tensions, which allow the graft to remodel to a stable and mature neoligament. In previous cadaver experiments, we showed that twisting the graft could modulate the graft forces. In this study we hypothesized that the same phenomena would be found in patients, and that twisting the graft intraoperatively can reduce peak forces in the graft. The effects of twist on graft forces in bone–patellar tendon–bone grafts were measured during anterior cruciate ligament surgery on 15 consecutive patients using a custom-made tension-measurement device. Variations in surgical procedure that could potentially affect the graft force patterns were quantified. Graft force as a function of knee-flexion angle was measured with the graft in the neutral, untwisted position and repeated with the tibial bone block rotated externally or internally by 180°. In eight of the 15 knees, external twisting of the graft reduced the maximal graft force to 50%. However, in five knees the forces in extension increased by twisting to a maximum of 300%. Of the surgical variables, only the femoral tunnel position appeared to have a consistent effect on the graft force pattern. Due to the unpredictable effect of graft twisting, a general recommendation on whether the graft should be twisted, and if so, in which direction, cannot be given. Intraoperatively, graft twisting may however be considered in every individual knee to modulate the graft force as a function of flexion angle.

The effects of grade III posterolateral knee complex injuries on anterior cruciate ligament graft force. A biomechanical analysis.

To determine if untreated grade III injuries of the posterolateral structures contribute to increased force on an anterior cruciate ligament graft, we measured the force in the graft in cadaveric knees during joint loading after reconstruction with otherwise intact structures and in the same reconstructed knees after selected cutting of specific posterolateral knee structures. Tests were first performed on the knee with the posterolateral structures intact and then after sequential sectioning of the fibular collateral ligament, popliteofibular ligament, and popliteus tendon. The graft force was significantly higher after fibular collateral ligament transection during varus loading at both 0 degree and 30 degrees of knee flexion than it was for the same loading of the joint with intact posterolateral structures. In addition, coupled loading of varus and internal rotation moments at 0 degree and 30 degrees of flexion further increased graft force beyond that with varus force alone. The increase in graft force remained significant with additional sequential cutting of the popliteofibular ligament and popliteus tendon. We believe this study supports the clinical observation that untreated grade III posterolateral structure injuries contribute to anterior cruciate ligament graft failure by allowing higher forces to stress the graft.

Knee joint motion and ligament forces before and after ACL reconstruction.

The goal of this in vitro study was to investigate the initial postoperative mechanical state of the knee with various types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. An experimental knee testing system was developed for the in vitro measurement of ligament forces and three-dimensional joint motion as external loads were applied to fresh knee specimens. Two groups of knee specimens were tested. In test series #1, two intraarticular reconstructions were performed in each of five specimens using semifree and free patellar tendon grafts with bone blocks. In test series #2, a more carefully controlled intraarticular reconstruction was performed in five specimens using a semifree composite graft consisting of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons augmented with the Ligament Augmentation Device. Ligament force and joint motion data were collected as anteriorly directed tibial loads were applied to the normal joint, the joint with a cut ACL and the reconstructed joint. These knee joint states were compared on the basis of ACL or graft forces, joint motion and load sharing by the collateral ligaments. The dominate result of the study was that the forces and motions defining the mechanical state of the knee after the ACL reconstructions in both test series were highly variable and abnormal when compared to the normal knee state. The higher level of surgical control series #2 did not decrease this variability. There was a poor correlation between motion of the reconstructed knee relative to normal, and the ACL graft force. There was little consistent difference in force and motion results between the surgical procedures tested.