Introduction: There are mounting data supporting a substantially lower risk of sICH in AIS patients with posterior circulation stroke (PCS) following treatment with IVT. However, stroke location is not included in any of the numerous risk prediction scores for sICH complicating IVT in AIS. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of IVT for AIS with respect to the location of acute cerebral ischemia in a high-volume tertiary care stroke center. Methods: Consecutive AIS patients treated with IVT during a five-year period were evaluated. Baseline stroke severity and early hypodensity on baseline CT were assessed by NIHSS-score and ASPECTS by certified physicians. Stroke location was classified as posterior (PCS) vs. anterior circulation (ACS), and supratentorial (STN) vs. infraterorial (ITN) infarction. Safety of IVT was evaluated using the SITS-MOST sICH definition. Three-month functional status was assessed using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores. Results: Out of total 1008 IVT-treated AIS patients [52% men, mean age 64±15years, median baseline NIHSS-score: 8 pts (IQR: 4-4)], 181 (18%) had PC and 88 (9%) had STN location. The rates of sICH were lower in patients with PCS [2.8% vs. 6.9%; p=0.039 by Fisher’s exact test (FET)] and ITN infarction (0% vs. 6.7%; p=0.005 by FET). PCS and ITN strokes (OR computed using Firth’s penalized likelihood method for rare events: 0.11; 95%CI: 0.01-1.82) were not independently associated with lower likelihood of sICH on multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for multiple potential confounders including demographics, vascular risk factors, onset-to-treatment time, baseline stroke severity, serum glucose, BP parameters and ASPECTS, pretreatment with antiplatelets (single or dual), statins and oral anticoagulants. Conclusions: Our study indicates that infarct location appears not to be independently related to the risk of sICH in AIS patients treated with IVT.
Read full abstract