Anterior Cervical Fusion Research Articles

Revision Surgery after Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plate vs Stand-Alone Cage over 2 to 5 Year Follow-Up.

retrospective study. To investigate the incidence of all-cause revision surgery between plated vs stand-alone cage constructs for single level ACDF. We retrospectively analyzed a commercial insurance claims database. Patients 18-65years-old were included if they underwent single-level inpatient ACDF (defined with CPT codes) from 2010 - 2018, with a minimum of 2-year continuous insurance enrollment. The primary independent variable was the use of anterior plating vs zero profile device or stand-alone cage. Synthetic (ie, metal, PEEK, etc.) vs allograft interbody was a secondary independent variable. The primary outcome variable was revision cervical arthrodesis after the index operation. In total, 21092 patients undergoing single-level inpatient ACDF were included. 10.0% received a stand-alone cage during the index operation. Mean follow-up duration was 4.5years. Revision arthrodesis occurred in 8.2% of patients overall, at a mean of 2.4years after the index surgery. Patients with anterior plating had a lower rate of all-cause revision surgery in unadjusted (overall rate 8.1% vs 9.6%, P = 0.0185) and adjusted analysis (OR 0.78, P = 0.0016) vs stand-alone cages. Patients with stand-alone cages had higher rates of revision with a posterior approach than did patients with plated constructs. In sub-analysis, the combination of a stand-alone interbody device with an allograft had significantly higher odds of revision than other combinations of devices. Among commercially insured patients ≤65years-old undergoing single-level ACDF, anterior plating was associated with a reduced incidence of revision surgery compared to stand-alone cages within the follow up period of our study.

A novel cervical vertebral bone quality score can independently predict cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion

ObjectivesTo optimize cervical vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score and explore its effectiveness in predicting cage subsidence in Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF) and identify a new method for evaluating subsidence without different equipment and image scale interference.MethodsCollecting demographic, imaging, and surgical related information. Measuring Cage Subsidence with a new method. Multifactorial logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with subsidence. Pearson’s correlation was used to determine the relationship between C-VBQ and computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HU). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess C-VBQ predictive ability. Correlations between demographics and C-VBQ scores were analyzed using linear regression models.Results92 patients were included in this study, 36 (39.1%) showed subsidence with a C-VBQ value of 2.05 ± 0.45, in the no-subsidence group C-VBQ Value was 3.25 ± 0.76. The multifactorial logistic regression showed that C-VBQ is an independent predictor of cage subsidence with a predictive accuracy of 93.4%. Pearson’s correlation analysis showed a negative correlation between C-VBQ and HU values. Linear regression analysis showed a positive correlation between C-VBQ and cage subsidence. Univariate analyses showed that only age was associated with C-VBQ.ConclusionsThe C-VBQ values obtained using the new measurements independently predicted postoperative cage subsidence after ACCF and showed a negative correlation with HU values. By adding the measurement of non-operated vertebral heights as a control standard, the results of cage subsidence measured by the ratio method are likely to be more robust, perhaps can exclude unavoidable errors caused by different equipment and proportional.

Comparison of Titanium Mesh Cage, Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide Cage, and 3D-Printed Vertebral Body for Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion.

A prospective non-randomized controlled study. To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) using titanium mesh cages (TMC), nanohydroxyapatite/polyamide66 (n-HA/PA66) cages, and 3D-printed vertebral bodies (3d-VBs). Postoperative subsidence of TMCs in ACCF had been widely reported. Newer implants such as n-HA/PA66 cages and 3d-VBs using biocompatible titanium alloy powder (Ti6Al4V) had been introduced to address this issue, but their outcomes remain controversial. We enrolled 60 patients undergoing ACCF using TMCs, n-HA/PA66 cages, or 3d-VBs from January 2020 to November 2021. For each group, there were 20 patients. Follow-up was conducted for minimum two years. Clinical outcomes, including Japanese Orthopaedic Associationscores (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and radiographic outcomes, including FSU height, fusion rate, and cervical alignment were collected pre-operatively and at each follow-up. A loss of FSU height equal or greater than 3mm was deemed implant subsidence. One-way analysis of variance was used for comparisons of mean values at different time points within the same group, with pairwise comparisons performed using the LSD method. The Mann-Whitney test was used for comparisons between groups. Categorical data such as gender, smoking status, implant subsidence and pathology level were analyzed using the chi-square test. Postoperative function of spinal unit (FSU) height loss at 2 years differed significantly among the TMC, n-HA/PA66, and 3d-VB groups, measuring 3.07±1.25mm, 2.11±0.73mm, and 1.46±0.71mm, respectively (P<0.001). The rates of implant subsidence were 45%, 20%, and 10%, respectively (P=0.031). All patients obtained solid fusion at 2-year follow-up. We observed statistically significant differences in VAS and JOA scores at 3 months postoperatively, and JOA scores at 2 years postoperatively among the three groups. At two-year follow-up, the n-HA/PA66 and the 3d-VBs groups exhibited less FSU height loss, lower subsidence rates and demonstrated better cervical lordosis than the TMC group. No severe postoperative complications were observed in any of the patients, and no patient required reoperation. At two-year follow-up after ACCF, the n-HA/PA66 and the 3d-VBs groups exhibited less FSU height loss, lower subsidence rates and demonstrated better cervical lordosis than the TMC group. Longer term observation of implant subsidence in ACCF using TMC, n-HA/PA66, and 3d-VB, is necessary. Therapeutic Level III.

Outcomes of non-contiguous two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: a retrospective study.

Non-contiguous two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) may be a viable option for patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy and imaging-evident spine and radicular compression at two non-contiguous cervical levels. The risk of hastening degeneration and triggering Adjacent Segment Disease at the spine levels located between the fused levels is a putative adverse event, which was assessed in a few studies. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing non-contiguous two levels ACDF and to assess biomechanical modifications at non-fused segments. We retrospectively reviewed all patients with noncontiguous two-level spine and radicular compression, who underwent simultaneous noncontiguous two-level ACDF at our center. We analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes and investigated the rate of adjacent segment disease. Radiographic parameters were calculated on pre- and postoperative images. Thirty-two patients underwent simultaneous noncontiguous two-level ACDF for cervical myelo-radiculopathy between 2015 and 2021 and were followed up for a mean period of 43.3 months. For all patients, the mJOA score significantly improved from 14.57 ± 2.3 to 16.5 ± 2.1 (p<0.01) and the NDI score significantly decreased from 21.45 ± 4.3 to 12.8 ± 2.3 (p<0.01) postoperatively. Cervical lordosis increased after surgery (from 9.65° ±9.47 to 15.12° ± 6.09); intermediate disc height decreased (5.68 mm ± 0.57 to 5.27 mm ±0.98); the ROMs of intermediate (from 12.45 ± 2.33 to 14.77 ± 1.98), cranial (from 14.63 ± 1.59 to 15.71 ± 1.02), and caudal (from 11.58 ± 2.32 to 13.33 ± 2.67) segments slightly increased. During follow-up assessment, in one patient the myelopathy worsened due to spine compression at the intermediate level. Simultaneous and non-contiguous two-level ACDF is a safe and effective procedure. The occurrence of postoperative adjacent and intermediate segment disease is rare.

P198. Health care utilization associated with postoperative physical therapy for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

P198. Health care utilization associated with postoperative physical therapy for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

13. Understanding the impact of low-density lipoprotein levels and lipid-lowering agents on rates of pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

13. Understanding the impact of low-density lipoprotein levels and lipid-lowering agents on rates of pseudarthrosis after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

P214. Surgical planning and morphological characteristics of in-situ bone grafts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a 3D simulation study

P214. Surgical planning and morphological characteristics of in-situ bone grafts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a 3D simulation study

Rapid qualitative analysis of recruitment obstacles in the FORVAD (Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy surgery versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy surgery in the treatment of cervical brachialgia) randomised, controlled trial

BackgroundThe number of surgical trials is increasing but such trials can be complex to deliver and pose specific challenges. A multi-centre, Phase III, RCT comparing Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Treatment of Cervical Brachialgia (FORVAD Trial) was unable to recruit to target. A rapid qualitative study was conducted during trial closedown to understand the experiences of healthcare professionals who participated in the FORVAD Trial, with the aim of informing future research in this area.MethodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 healthcare professionals who had participated in the FORVAD Trial. Interviews explored participants’ experiences of the FORVAD trial. A rapid qualitative analysis was conducted, informed by Normalisation Process Theory.ResultsFour main themes were generated in the data analysis: (1) individual vs. community equipoise; (2) trial set-up and delivery; (3) identifying and approaching patients; and (4) timing of randomisation. The objectives of the FORVAD trial made sense to participants and they supported the idea that there was clinical or collective equipoise regarding the two FORVAD interventions; however, many surgeons had treatment preferences and lacked individual equipoise. The site which had most recruitment success had adopted a more structured process for identification and recruitment of patients, whereas other sites that adopted more “ad hoc” screening strategies struggled to identify patients. Randomisation on the day of surgery caused both medico-legal and practical concerns at some sites.ConclusionsOrganisation and implementation of a surgical trial in neurosurgery is complex and presents many challenges. Sites often reported low recruitment and discussed the logistical issues of conducting a complex surgical RCT. Future trials in neurosurgery may need to offer more flexibility and time during set-up to maximise opportunities for larger recruitment numbers. Rapid qualitative analysis informed by Normalisation Process Theory was able to quickly identify key issues with trial implementation so rapid qualitative analysis may be a useful approach for teams conducting qualitative research in trials.Trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN reference: 10,133,661. Registered 23rd November 2018.

26. Cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

26. Cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

P207. Partial uncinatectomy combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of one-level cervical radiculopathy: analysis of clinical efficacy and sagittal alignment

P207. Partial uncinatectomy combined with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of one-level cervical radiculopathy: analysis of clinical efficacy and sagittal alignment

P111. Surgical trends in use of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion from 2010 to 2021

P111. Surgical trends in use of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion from 2010 to 2021

10. Outcomes of 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty comparing with 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

10. Outcomes of 3-level cervical disc arthroplasty comparing with 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

P43. Impact of radiographic parameters on adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

P43. Impact of radiographic parameters on adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

P215. Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis

P215. Ten-year outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Prevertebral Soft-tissue Swelling Following One-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis Based on Surgical Level.

The purposes of this study were to identify the primary level at which PSTS occurs following one level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) based on surgical level, and to quantify the degree to which it occurs. Although prevertebral tissue swelling (PSTS) peaks at day 2 or 3 after ACDF, with swelling noted to be prominent at levels C2-4, the way in which the features of PSTS vary according to surgical level has not been examined. 37 patients who underwent one-level ACDF were reviewed and classified into retropharyngeal and retrotracheal group based on surgical level. PSTS occurring at C2-C6 and the width of airway (WA) at C2-C4 was assessed using plain radiographs before surgery and at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days postoperatively. The retropharyngeal group comprised 10 patients while the retrotracheal group comprised 27 patients. Retropharyngeal group had the most severe PSTS on day 3 after surgery. C4 showed PSTS peaked on day 3, with a value of 3.26 times the preoperative prevertebral tissue thickness. WA at C4 was narrowest on day 1, with a value of 0.74 times and remained narrow until day 3. The retrotracheal group showed the most severe PSTS on day 1 at level C3:2.81 times. WA at C4 was narrowest on day 1 with a value of 0.78 times and increased thereafter. PSTS following one-level ACDF for both retropharyngeal and retrotracheal lesions was greatest at the C3 and C4 levels, with peaks on the third day after operation for the former, and the first day for the latter. WA at C4 was narrowest from day 1 in both groups. In the retrophyaryngeal group, narrowing remained until day 3.

Revisiting the Posterior Approach for Cervical Radiculopathy Utilizing Endoscopic Techniques: A Favorable Short-Term Outcome and Cost Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Cervical radiculopathy is a spine ailment frequently requiring surgical decompression via anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior foraminotomy/discectomy. While endoscopic posterior foraminotomy/discectomy is gaining popularity, its financial impact remains understudied despite equivalent randomized long-term outcomes to ACDF. In a cohort of patients undergoing ACDF vs endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy, we sought to compare the total cost of the surgical episode while confirming an equivalent safety profile and perioperative outcomes. A single-center retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy undergoing ACDF or endoscopic cervical foraminotomy between 2018 and 2023 was undertaken. Primary outcomes included the total cost of care for the initial surgical episode (not charges or reimbursement). Perioperative variables and neurological recovery were recorded. Multivariable analysis tested age, body mass index, race, gender, insurance type, operative time, and length of stay. A total of 38 ACDF and 17 endoscopic foraminotomy/discectomy operations were performed. All patients underwent single-level surgery except for 2 two-level endoscopic decompressions. No differences were found in baseline characteristics and symptom length except for younger age (46.8 ± 9.4 vs 57.6 ± 10.3, P = 0.002) and more smokers (18.4% vs 11.8%, P = 0.043) in the ACDF group. Actual hospital costs for the episode of surgical care were markedly higher in the ACDF cohort (mean ±95% CI; $27,782 ± $2011 vs $10,103 ± $720, P < 0.001) driven by the ACDF approach (β = $17,723, P < 0.001) on multivariable analysis. On sensitivity analysis, ACDF was never cost-efficient compared with endoscopic foraminotomy, and endoscopic failure rates of 64% were required for break-even cost. ACDF was associated with significantly longer operative time (167.7 ± 22.0 vs 142.7 ± 27.4 minutes, P < 0.001) and length of stay (1.1 ± 0.5 vs 0.1 ± 0.2 days, P < 0.001). No significant difference was found regarding 90-day neurological improvement, readmission, reoperation, or complications. Compared with patients treated with a single-level ACDF for unilateral cervical radiculopathy, endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy can achieve a similar safety profile, pain relief, and neurological recovery at considerably less cost. These findings may help patients and surgeons revisit offering the posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy utilizing endoscopic techniques. Endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy/discectomy offers comparable safety, pain relief, and neurological recovery to traditional methods but at a significantly lower cost.

Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Neck Pain in Patients with Cervical Spondylosis: Pooled Results of Three Prospective Cohort Studies

IntroductionCurrently, there is a lack of large-scale prospective cohort data to explore the response of neck pain to anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). The aim of this study was to investigate whether patients with neck pain can achieve consistent neck pain relief following ACDF regardless of preoperative neurological symptoms and number of surgical segments. Materials and MethodsThe study was a pooled analysis of three multicenter prospective cohort studies. Patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy with significant neck pain (visual analogue scale [VAS] ≥ 4) underwent ACDF were included. Neck pain VAS scores (VAS-neck) were collected at preoperative and postoperative follow-up time points (3 months, 6 months, and 1 year). Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients with radiculopathy, myelopathy, or myeloradiculopathy, as well as for single- versus multi-segment ACDF. ResultsA total of 237 patients were confirmed. Patients showed significant improvement in VAS-neck at all follow-up time points compared with baseline (P < 0.001 for each). In the first year after surgery, VAS-neck were reduced by 3.3 points (57.0%) on average, and the rates of achieving minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) were 72.2% and 73.8%, respectively. Meanwhile, one year after surgery, there was no significant difference in ΔVAS-neck, recovery rate, MCID and PASS attainment rate between the radiculopathy, myelopathy and myeloradiculopathy groups, and the same trend was observed between the single-segment and multi-segment groups. ConclusionThis study found that ACDF significantly improved neck pain in the patients with cervical spondylosis, regardless of preoperative neurological symptoms and number of surgical segments.

A Meta-Analysis of Surgical Outcomes in 25727 Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion or Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Cervical Deformity.

Systematic Review. To evaluate which cervical deformity correction technique between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) produces better clinical, radiographic, and operative outcomes. We conducted a meta-analysis comparing studies involving ACDF and ACCF. Adult patients with either original or previously treated cervical spine deformities were included. Two independent reviewers categorized extracted data into clinical, radiographic, and operative outcomes, including complications. Clinical assessments included patient-reported outcomes; radiographic evaluations examined C2-C7 Cobb angle, T1 slope, T1-CL, C2-7 SVA, and graft stability. Surgical measures included surgery duration, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications. 26 studies (25727 patients) met inclusion criteria and were extracted. Of these, 14 studies (19077 patients) with low risk of bias were included in meta-analysis. ACDF and ACCF similarly improve clinical outcomes in terms of JOA and NDI, but ACDF is significantly better at achieving lower VAS neck scores. ACDF is also more advantageous for improving cervical lordosis and minimizing the incidence of graft complications. While there is no significant difference between approaches for most surgical complications, ACDF is favorable for reducing operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay. While both techniques benefit cervical deformity patients, when both techniques are feasible, ACDF may be superior with respect to VAS neck scores, cervical lordosis, graft complications and certain perioperative outcomes. Further studies are recommended to address outcome variability and refine surgical approach selection.

The efficacy and safety of mini-open (air/water medium) endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

To compare the clinical efficacy of mini-open (air/water medium) endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (MOEA-ACDF) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). This study retrospectively analysed the clinical data of CSM patients who received surgical treatment from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical method: the MOEA-ACDF group and the ACDF group. The preoperative and postoperative imaging results at one week and the last follow-up examination were compared between the two groups. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and neck disability index (NDI) score were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes preoperatively, one week postoperatively and at the last follow-up examination. The minimum follow-up duration was 12 months. A total of 131 CSM patients who underwent surgery at our institution were included, including 61 patients in the MOEA-ACDF group and 70 patients in the ACDF group. In the MOEA-ACDF group, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and HAVB were significantly greater than the preoperative values (P < 0.05). In the ACDF group, the postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle was also significantly greater than the preoperative value, and the C2-C7 ROM and HAVB significantly decreased (P < 0.05). The postoperative neurological function of the patients in both groups improved, and the postoperative VAS score and NDI score significantly decreased. Compared with ACDF, MOEA-ACDF is associated with a significantly larger postoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle and significantly better C2-C7 ROM and HAVB, as well as better clinical efficacy (P < 0.05). MOEA-ACDF combines endoscopic systems with ACDF technology to treat CSM, but its clinical efficacy is not inferior to that of ACDF in the short- to intermediate-term. It can effectively and safely restore the cervical intervertebral height, physiological curvature, and range of motion.

The incidence, clinical features and risk factors for postoperative retropharyngeal hematoma and related dyspnea following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a single-center study of 10615 patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPostoperative retropharyngeal hematoma (PRH) and related dyspnea are rare but life-threatening complications following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) that require urgent recognition and treatment. However, current knowledge of PRH after ACDF is limited. Meanwhile, whether the morphological features of upper airway are the risk factors of PRH remains unknown. PURPOSEThe study aimed to investigate the incidence, clinical features, and risk factors, especially the morphological features of upper airway, of PRH and related dyspnea following ACDF. STUDY DESIGNA nested case‒control study. PATIENT SAMPLEConsecutive patients who underwent ACDF at a single institute from January 2010 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. OUTCOME MEASURESThe outcome measures included the incidence, clinical features, intervention, outcome and risk factors for PRH and related dyspnea. METHODSAll patients with PRH were classified into the hematoma group. For each PRH subject, 3 control subjects without PRH were randomly selected as the control group. The clinical features, interventions and outcomes of patients were described. Potential risk factors were evaluated, including demographics, comorbidities, surgical characteristics, coagulation function, blood loss, preoperative blood pressure, and the morphological features of upper airway [prevertebral soft tissue thickness (PVT) and location of transverse arytenoid muscle (TAM) and epiglottis]. Univariate tests and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to determine the risk factors for PRH. Subgroup analysis was also conducted for PRH patients with and without dyspnea. RESULTSAmong the 10615 patients who underwent ACDF, 18 (0.17%) developed PRH. The median time from the index surgery to PRH formation was 8.5 hours (25 and 75 percentile: 4 hours to 24 hours). All the PRH patients initially presented with wound swelling. Twelve (0.11%) patients presented dyspnea due to PRH, 2 of whom received urgent intubation and 1 of whom received emergent tracheotomy. All patients underwent hematoma evacuation, and most of them presented with completely relieved symptoms after evacuation, except for 1 patient who died from ischemic hypoxic encephalopathy. A level between the epiglottis and the TAM (LET) greater than 2, ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and higher diastolic blood pressure (DBP) before surgery were found to be risk factors for PRH formation. Subgroup analysis revealed that a smaller prevertebral soft tissue thickness at C5 was associated with the development of dyspnea. CONCLUSIONThis study is the largest study to date focusing on the PRH and related dyspnea after ACDF. Our study showed that the incidences of PRH and related dyspnea after ACDF were 0.17% and 0.11%, respectively. The predominant symptoms of PRH were wound swelling and acute dyspnea. Most PRH cases occurred in the acute postoperative period. We demonstrated the risk factors for PRH to be (1) OPLL, (2) LET≥2 and (3) higher DBP before surgery and advocate paying increased attention to upper airway morphological features for identifying the risk of PRH after ACDF. With urgent recognition and timely intervention, severe clinical outcomes could be avoided.