Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion Research Articles

Single-level cervical disc replacement (CDR) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): A Nationwide matched analysis of complications, 30- and 90-day readmission rates, and cost

Single-level cervical disc replacement (CDR) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF): A Nationwide matched analysis of complications, 30- and 90-day readmission rates, and cost

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Replacement for a Workers' Compensation Population in an Ambulatory Surgical Center.

Retrospective Cohort. To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disk replacement (CDR) in the Workers' Compensation (WC) population. No studies to our knowledge have compared PROMs and MCID attainment between ACDF and CDR among patients with WC insurance undergoing surgery in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center (ASC). WC insurance patients undergoing primary, single/double-level ACDF/CDR in an ASC were identified. Patients were divided into ACDF versus CDR. PROMs were collected at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year timepoints, including PROMIS-PF, SF-12 PCS/MCS, VAS neck/arm, and NDI. Seventy-nine patients were included, 51 ACDF/28 CDR. While operative time (56.4 vs. 54.4min), estimated blood loss (29.2 vs. 25.9mL), POD0 pain (4.9 vs. 3.8), and POD0 narcotic consumption (21.2 vs. 14.5 oral morphine equivalents) were higher in ACDF patients, none reached statistical significance ( P >0.050, all). One-year arthrodesis rate was 100.0% among ACDF recipients with available imaging (n=36). ACDF cohort improved from preoperative for PROMIS-PF from 12 weeks to 1 year, SF-12 PCS at 6 months, all timepoints for VAS neck/arm, and 12 weeks/6 months for NDI ( P ≤0.044, all). CDR cohort improved from preoperative for PROMIS-PF at 6 months, VAS neck/arm from 12 weeks to 1 year, and NDI at 12 weeks/6 months ( P ≤0.049, all). CDR cohort reported significantly lower VAS neck at 12 weeks/1 year and VAS arm at 12 weeks ( P ≤0.039, all). MCID achievement rates did not differ. While operative duration/estimated blood loss/acute postoperative pain/narcotic consumption were, on average, higher among ACDF recipients, these were not statistically significant, possibly due to the limited sample size. ACDF and CDR ASC patients generally demonstrated comparable arm pain/disability/physical function/mental health, though neck pain was significantly lower at multiple timepoints among CDR patients. Clinically meaningful PROM improvements were comparable. Larger, multicentered studies are required to confirm our results.

Follow-up of a new titanium cervical plate for fusion of the cervical spine.

Cervical plates are in use since the 1990ies for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The latest step in development was a dynamic plate that allows sliding of the screws facilitating the natural settling of the bone after surgery. We investigated the clinical and radiological results of such a dynamic plate in a patient cohort that underwent single or multi-level ACDF for various cervical degenerative indications, including revision cases, from 2014 to 2019. Clinical and radiological outcome were assessed in 60 eligible patients after a mean of 2.9 years. The assessed neck disability index (NDI), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck and arm pain show comparable results to the literature of ACDF, and specifically other plate designs. Forty-eight Adverse and Serious Adverse Events do not show a link to the product used. Clinical and radiological outcomes of ACDF with dynamic, third generation cervical plates show comparable results to the literature. Careful reporting of all Adverse Events revealed a variety of concomitant diseases, but could not be correlated to the implant used.

Clinical Effectiveness of Artificial Disc Replacement in Comparison With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in the Patients With Cervical Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Cervical myelopathy (CM) describes the compressive cervical spinal cord state, often accompanied by serious clinical condition, by herniated disc or hypertrophied spurs or ligament. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been frequently employed as conventional surgical solution for this CM despite its inherent biomechanical handicap. Alternatively, an artificial disc replacement (ADR) preserves cervical motion while still decompressing the spinal canal and neural foramen. This analysis elaborated to clarify the potential benefits of ADR application to CM over ACDF from the conglomerated results of the past references. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane review, and KMbase databases from the studies published until March 2023. Six studies (3 randomized controlled study [RCTs] and 3 non-RCTs) were included in a qualitative and quantitative synthesis. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random effects model to obtain effect size and its statistical significance. Quality assessment and evidence level were established in accordance with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology. Among 6 studies, 2 studies showed that ADR group achieved significantly better clinical improvement than the ACDF group, while the rest 4 studies revealed no significant difference. A meta-analysis showed better clinical outcomes with or without statistical significance. The level of evidence was low because of inconsistency and imprecision. ADR was superior or at least, not inferior to ACDF in terms of functional recovery. However, its application to the CM patients is merely empowered with weak strength due to low level of evidence.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Patients with Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease Treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Integrated Interbody Spacers

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is among the most common spine procedures. Adjacent segment disease (ASD), characterized by degenerative disease at an adjacent spinal level to a prior fusion, is a well-recognized and significant sequela following ACDF. Adjacent segment ACDF may be considered after the failure of non-surgical options for patients with symptomatic ASD. This study aimed to assess the incidence of dysphagia and other complications as well as radiographic outcomes in adult patients who have undergone ACDF with an integrated interbody spacer device for symptomatic ASD. This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent ACDF for symptomatic ASD with commercially available integrated interbody spacers by three spine surgeons at an academic institution from March 2018 to April 2022. Demographic, radiographic, and postoperative data were collected, including dysphagia, device-related complications, and the need for revision surgery. There were 48 patients (26 male, 22 female) who met inclusion criteria (mean age 59.7 years, mean body mass index 19.5 kg/m2) who underwent ACDF for symptomatic ASD (1one-level, n= 44; 2-level, n= 4). Overall, 12 patients (25%) experienced dysphagia postoperatively before the first follow-up appointment. Nine of 44 (20.4%) of 1-level ACDF patients experienced dysphagia, and 3 of 4 (75%) of 2-level ACDF patients experienced dysphagia. Three patients had severe dysphagia which prompted an otolaryngology referral. Two of those patients remained symptomatic at 6 weeks postoperatively. Of 43 patients with prior plate cage systems, none required hardware removal at the time of surgery. Preoperative global and segmental lordosis were 9.07° ± 8.36° (P= 0.22) and 3.58° ± 4.57° (P= 0.14), respectively. At 6 weeks postoperatively, global and segmental lordosis were 11.44° ± 9.06° (P= 0.54) and 5.11° ± 4.44° (P= 0.44), respectively. This constitutes a change of+2.37° and+1.53° in global and segmental lordosis, respectively. The mean anterior disc height change between preoperative and immediate postoperative time points was 6.3 ± 3.1 mm. Between the immediate postoperative and 6-week postoperative time points, the mean anterior disc height change was -1.5 ± 2.7 mm. Between the immediate postoperative and 3-month postoperative time points, the mean anterior disc height change was -3.7 ± 5.0 mm. The posterior disc height changes at the same time points were 2.5 ± 1.7 mm, -0.4 ± 1.8. and -0.5 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. This fusion rate was 50% and 70% at 6 months and 1 year post-surgery, respectively. ACDF with integrated spacer is a viable alternative to traditional plate-cage systems for symptomatic ASD. An advantage over traditional plate-cage systems is that the removal of prior instrumentation is not needed in order to place implants. Based on a review of the literature, these standalone systems allowed for a shorter operative time and had less incidence of dysphagia than plate-cage systems for ASD after ACDF. The different standalone and plate-cage systems used in treating ASD after ACDF surgeries should be compared in prospective studies.

Preoperative Dehydration Predicts Adverse Events Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common procedure for neck arthritis, typically alleviating pain and improving function. Preoperative dehydration has been correlated with postoperative infection, acute renal failure, deep vein thrombosis, and increased hospital length of stay. However, some studies have suggested that preoperative dehydration has a minimal relationship with postoperative outcomes, specifically in arthroplasty and lumbar surgery candidates. Patients who underwent ACDF from 2015 to 2020 as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. We excluded patients who presented with acute trauma. Dehydration was determined using the accepted definition of preoperative blood urea nitrogen to creatinine ratio greater than 20. Lengths of stay and 30-day postoperative adverse events were compared between dehydrated and nondehydrated cohorts, adjusting for baseline features using standard multivariate regression. We identified 14,932 patients, and 4206 (28.1%) of whom were preoperatively dehydrated. Dehydrated patients had significantly higher odds of wound, hematological, and pulmonary complications; Clavien-Dindo grade IV, delayed length of stay (>5 days); and a lower likelihood of being discharged home (P < 0.005), even after controlling for demographic features (eg, sex, age, body mass index, race, and ethnicity). Furthermore, linear regression suggested an overall half-day increased length of hospital stay for dehydrated patients (95% CI [0.36, 0.60], P < 0.001). Preoperative dehydration is common among ACDF surgery patients and appears to correlate with an increased risk of postoperative complications and prolonged length of hospital stay. Evaluation of a patient's hydration status from standard preoperative laboratory metrics can be employed for risk stratification, patient counseling, and timing of ACDF surgeries.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with and without plating: A comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes.

Treatment for degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine primarily aims to decompress neural structures and preserve the former height of the disc space and foramina. Popular methods include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using cages with plates or without plates (standalone cages). However, it is still debatable whether a plate is necessary for enhanced treatment outcomes. This paper reviews current literature reports, adding insights from the authors' experience. A literature search was performed with keywords related to ACDF with or without cervical plating. We analyzed the titles and abstracts to identify all potentially relevant studies. Out of these, a total of 28 original research and 5 systematic reviews/meta-analyses met our inclusion criteria. The success of surgery for cervical disc disease depends fundamentally on the appropriate decompression of neural structures. This is the main determinant of postoperative clinical improvement measured according to scales capturing changes in pain intensity and quality of life. An ideal replacement for natural components of the human body does not exist, even though more and more refined solutions are developed every year. A comparison of treatment outcomes using non-plated (standalone) cages and cage + plate systems requires separate analysis of radiological and clinical outcomes. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. Radiological outcomes are slightly better with cage + plate systems, and clinical outcomes are comparable.

Comparison between Three-Dimensional Printed Titanium and PEEK Cages for Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Controlled Trial.

The three-dimensional printing titanium (3DPT) cage with excellent biomechanical properties and osseointegration capabilities has been initially used in spinal fusion, while the polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage, a bioinert material device, has been a widely used for decades with relatively excellent clinical outcomes. This study was performed to investigate the early radiographic and clinical outcomes of 3DPT cage versus PEEK cage in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). This prospective controlled trial, from December 2019 to June 2022, included patients undergoing ACDF and TLIF with 3DPT cages and compared them to patients using PEEK cages for treating spinal degenerative disorders. The outcome measures included radiographic parameters (intervertebral height [IH], subsidence, fusion status, and bone-cage interface contact) and clinical outcomes (Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA], Neck Disability Index [NDI], Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Short Form 12-Item Survey [SF-12], Visual Analog Scale [VAS], and Odom's criteria). Student's independent samples t test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to compare the outcome measures between the two groups before surgery and at 1 week, 3 and 6 months after surgery. For the patients undergoing ACDF, the 3DPT (18 patients/[26 segments]) and PEEK groups (18 patients/[26 segments]) had similar fusion rates at 3 months and 6 months follow-up (3 months: 96.2% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.182; 6 months: 100% vs. 91.7%, p = 0.225). The subsidence in the 3DPT group was significantly lower than that in the PEEK group (3 months: 0.4 ± 0.2 mm vs. 0.9 ± 0.7 mm p = 0.004; 6 months: 0.7 ± 0.3 mm vs. 1.5 ± 0.8 mm, p < 0.001). 3DPT and PEEK cage all achieved sufficient contact with the cervical endplates. For the patients undergoing TLIF, the 3DPT (20 patients/[26 segments]) and PEEK groups (20 patients/[24 segments]) had no statistical difference in fusion rate (3 months: 84.6% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.059; 6 months: 92.3% vs. 75%, p = 0.132). The subsidence was lower than that in the PEEK group without significantly difference (3 months: 0.9 ± 0.7 mm vs.1.2 ± 0.9 mm p = 0.136; 6 months: 1.6 ± 1.0 mm vs. 2.0 ± 1.0 mm, p = 0.200). At the 3-month follow-up, the bone-cage interface contact of the 3DPT cage was significantly better than that of the PEEK cage (poor contact: 15.4% vs. 75%, p < 0.001). The values of UAR were higher in the 3DPT group than in the PEEK group during the follow-up in cervical and lumbar fusion, there were more statistical differences in lumbar fusion. There were no significant differences in the clinical assessment between 3DPT or PEEK cage in spinal fusion. The 3DPT cage and PEEK cage can achieve excellent clinical outcomes in cervical and lumbar fusion. The 3DPT cage has advantage in fusion quality, subsidence severity, and bone-cage interface contact than PEEK cage.

Should patient eligibility criteria for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) be expanded? A retrospective cohort analysis of relatively contraindicated patients undergoing CDA

Background ContextCervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a safe and effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of various degenerative pathologies with advantages of motion preservation and lower rates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Absolute contraindications for CDA have been well outlined in order to prevent adverse outcomes in patients. However, in cases of patients with relative contraindications (kyphotic deformity, prior cervical surgery, etc.), there remains controversy. There is minimal literature evaluating long-term outcomes in this patient population. PurposeTo compare long-term clinical and functional outcomes of CDA in typical patients versus those with relative contraindications. DesignRetrospective cohort review. Patient SampleEighty-nine patients were included in the study: 55 (no contraindications) in Group 1 and 34 (relatively contraindicated) in Group 2 and 26 (preoperative segmental kyphosis) in Group 3. Outcome Measures(1) Patient demographics; (2) perioperative data; (3) rates of complications and revisions; (5) visual analogue scale (VAS), and neck disability index (NDI) scores. MethodsPatients were placed in the relatively contraindicated cohort if they possessed at least one of the following: (1) segmental kyphosis of 5° to 10°, (2) significant loss of disc height (between 50% and 75% of initial measurements or 1.5–3mm), (3) bridging osteophytes, and (4) prior cervical spine surgery based on preoperative cervical radiographs. The other cohort included patients without any relative contraindication who underwent CDA over the same time frame. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was used to compare those without any contraindications to those with only preoperative segmental kyphosis. Patients were included in this study if they met the following criteria: over 18 years of age, minimum follow-up of 24 months, and availability of complete medical records. Patient demographics, levels operated on, and perioperative outcomes were assessed between the two groups. Revision and complication rates were recorded. Functional outcomes scores were compared using VAS and NDI scores at 6-months, 12-months and final follow-up. ResultsMean follow-up was 40.8 months in Group 1 and 38.3 months in Group 2 (p=.569). Complication rates were 21.8% in Group 1 and 26.4% in Group 2 (p=.615). Complication rates in a comparison between Groups 1 and 3 were statistically insignificant (p=.383). The most common complication was transient approach-related postoperative dysphagia (Group 1: 20% vs Group 2: 23.5%, p=.693). No significant differences were observed in the rates of transient dysphonia (Group 1: 0.0% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.201), adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 0.0%, p=.429), infection (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.712), heterotopic ossification (Group 1: 49.1% vs Group 2: 50.0%, p=.934) or spontaneous fusion (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.728). No revision surgeries were observed in either cohort. All three groups demonstrated significant improvements in their VAS and NDI scores compared with preoperative measurements (p<.001), but no significant differences were found in the degree of improvement between groups at any point in time. ConclusionsOur study found no significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes between patients undergoing 1- and 2-level CDA with relative contraindications versus typical patients. These findings suggest that patient eligibility criteria for CDA may warrant expansion. However, future prospective studies over a longer period of follow-up are necessary to corroborate our results.

A Comparison of Corpectomy ACDF Hybrid Procedures with Nano-Hydroxyapatite/Polyamide 66 Cage and Titanium Mesh Cage for Multi-level Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Stepwise Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Previous studies have found satisfactory clinical results with the nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide 66 (n-HA/PA66) cage to reconstruct the stability of anterior cervical column. However, studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of the n-HA/PA66 cage in multi-level degenerative cervical myelopathy (MDCM) have not been reported. This study aims to compare the outcomes of corpectomy anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) hybrid procedures between the n-HA/PA66 cage and titanium mesh cage (TMC) to treat MDCM. After the screening for eligibility, this retrospective study involved 90 patients who underwent corpectomy ACDF hybrid (CACDFH) procedure from June 2013 to June 2018. The CACDFH procedure is the combination of ACDF and anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). According to the cage utilized, we categorized patients into a n-HA/PA66 cage group and a TMC group. Then, stepwise propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to maintain comparable clinical data between groups. All the patients were followed up ≥4 years and the longest follow-up time was 65.43 (±11.49) months. Cage subsidence, adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), segmental height (SH), segmental angle (SA), cervical lordosis (CL), and clinical data (visual analogue scale [VAS] and Japanese Orthopaedic Association [JOA] score) was evaluated preoperatively, at 1 week, and at the final surgery follow-up. The independent student's t test and chi-square test were applied to compare the differences between groups. Through PSM analysis, 25 patients from the n-HA/PA66 group were matched to 25 patients in the TMC group. The occurrence of ASD was 16.0% (4/25) in the n-HA/PA 66 group, which was significantly less than in the TMC group at 44.0% (11/25) (p = 0.031). Moreover, the cage subsidence rate was significantly higher in the TMC group as compared to the n-HA/PA 66 group (40.0% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.024). But there was no significant difference in SH, SA, and CL at any time after surgery as determined through follow-up. The VAS and JOA scores significantly improved in both groups at 3 months postoperative and at final follow-up. However, there were no significant differences in the VAS and JOA score at any time between the two groups in preoperative (p > 0.05). The n-HA/PA66 cage is associated with lower rate of cage subsidence and ASD than the TMC in the treatment of MDCM. The n-HA/PA66 cage could be superior to the TMC in corpectomy ACDF hybrid procedures.

Mid-term and Long-term Outcomes After Total Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The aim of this study was to compare mid-term to long-term outcomes of cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease. After ACDF to treat symptomatic cervical degenerative disk disease, the loss of motion at the index level due to fusion may accelerate adjacent-level disk degeneration. CDA was developed to preserve motion and reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. Early-term to mid-term clinical outcomes from RCTs suggest noninferiority of CDA compared with ACDF, but it remains unclear whether CDA yields better mid-term to long-term outcomes than ACDF. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for RCTs with at least 60 months of follow-up. The risk ratio or standardized mean difference (and 95% CIs) were calculated for dichotomous or continuous variables, respectively. Eighteen reports of 14 RCTs published in 2014-2023 were included. The pooled analysis demonstrated that the CDA group had a significantly greater improvement in neurological success and Neck Disability Index than the ACDF group. The ACDF group exhibited a significantly better improvement in the Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary than the CDA group. Radiographic adjacent segment degeneration was significantly lower in the CDA group at 60- and 84-month follow-ups; at 120-month follow-up, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. Although the overall rate of secondary surgical procedures was significantly lower in the CDA group, we did not observe any significant difference at 60-month follow-up between the CDA and ACDF group and appreciated statistically significant lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery at 84-month and 108- to 120-month follow-up. The rate of adverse events and the neck and arm pain scores in the CDA group were not significantly different from those of the ACDF group. In this meta-analysis of 14 RCTs with 5- to 10-year follow-up data, CDA resulted in significantly better neurological success and Neck Disability Index scores and lower rates of radiographic adjacent segment degeneration, secondary surgical procedures, and symptomatic adjacent-level disease requiring surgery than ACDF. ACDF resulted in improved Short Form-36 Health Survey Physical Component Summary scores. However, the CDA and ACDF groups did not exhibit significant differences in overall changes in neck and arm pain scores or rates of adverse events.

Recovery Kinetics After Cervical Spine Surgery.

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained multisurgeon registry. To study recovery kinetics and associated factors after cervical spine surgery. Few studies have described return to activities cervical spine surgery. This is a big gap in the literature, as preoperative counseling and expectations before surgery are important. Patients who underwent either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk replacement (CDR) were included. Data collected included preoperative patient-reported outcome measures, return to driving, return to working, and discontinuation of opioids data. A multivariable regression was conducted to identify the factors associated with return to driving by 15 days, return to working by 15 days, and discontinuing opioids by 30 days. Seventy ACDF patients and 70 CDR patients were included. Overall, 98.2% of ACDF patients and 98% of CDR patients returned to driving in 16 and 12 days, respectively; 85.7% of ACDF patients and 90.9% of CDR patients returned to work in 16 and 14 days; and 98.3% of ACDF patients and 98.3% of CDR patients discontinued opioids in a median of seven and six days. Though not significant, minimal (odds ratio (OR)=1.65) and moderate (OR=1.79) disability was associated with greater odds of returning to driving by 15 days. Sedentary work (OR=0.8) and preoperative narcotics (OR=0.86) were associated with decreased odds of returning to driving by 15 days. Medium (OR=0.81) and heavy (OR=0.78) intensity occupations were associated with decreased odds of returning to work by 15 days. High school education (OR=0.75), sedentary work (OR=0.79), and retired/not working (OR=0.69) were all associated with decreased odds of discontinuing opioids by 30 days. Recovery kinetics for ACDF and CDR are comparable. Most patients return to all activities after ACDF and CDR within 16 days. These findings serve as an important compass for preoperative counseling.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Structural Allograft is Associated With Lower Postoperative Health Care Utilization and Reoperations Compared With Cage Implants.

Implants represent a large component of surgical cost, with several available options for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Rising ACDF volume highlights the need for accurate cost characterization among implant configurations to inform efficient utilization. A cohort study of patients who underwent 1-level or 2-level ACDF in 2017 was conducted using the MarketScan national insurance databases, which contain deidentified clinical and financial data. Implant configurations included plate with cage, standalone cage, and plate with structural allograft. Patients who switched insurance providers within 2 years after surgery or underwent concurrent posterior cervical surgery, cervical disk arthroplasty, or cervical corpectomy were excluded. A combined plate/cage and standalone cage group was compared with the allograft group followed by the comparison of the plate/cage and standalone cage groups. In total, 30-day, 90-day, and 2-year aggregate costs; component costs of physical therapy, injections, medications, psychological treatment, and subsequent spine surgery; and reoperation rates were evaluated. Of 1723 patients identified, 360 (20.9%) underwent surgery with plate/cage, 184 (10.7%) with standalone cage, and 1179 (68.4%) with allograft. Aggregate costs were lower in the allograft group compared with the combined cage group at 90 days ($36 428 vs $39 875, P = .04) and 2 years ($64 951 vs $74 965, P = .005) postoperatively. There were no significant differences in aggregate costs between the plate/cage and standalone cage groups. The 2-year reoperation rate was higher in the combined cage compared with the allograft group (23.9% vs 10.9%, P < .001) and was also higher in the standalone cage compared with the plate/cage group (32.0% vs 19.7%, P = .002). Compared with alternative ACDF constructs, allograft is associated with lower postoperative costs and reoperation rates. Although costs are similar, reoperation rates are lower with plate/cage constructs compared with those of standalone cages. Surgeons should consider these financial and clinical differences when selecting implant configurations.

An 11-Year-Long Analysis of the Risks Associated With Age in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in a Large, Urban Academic Hospital.

A retrospective database study of patients at an urban academic medical center undergoing an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) surgery between 2008 and 2019. ACDF is one of the most common spinal procedures. Old age has been found to be a common risk factor for postoperative complications across a plethora of spine procedures. Little is known about how this risk changes among elderly cohorts such as the difference between elderly (60+) and octogenarian (80+) patients. This study seeks to analyze the disparate rates of complications following elective ACDF between patients aged 60-69 or 70-79 and 80+ at an urban academic medical center. We identified patients who had undergone ACDF procedures using CPT codes 22,551, 22,552, and 22,554. Emergent procedures were excluded, and patients were subdivided on the basis of age. Then each cohort was propensity matched for univariate and univariate logistic regression analysis. The propensity matching resulted in 25 pairs in both the 70-79 and 80+ y.o. cohort comparison and 60-69 and 80+ y.o. cohort comparison. None of the cohorts differed significantly in demographic variables. Differences between elderly cohorts were less pronounced: the 80+ y.o. cohort experienced only significantly higher total direct cost (P = .03) compared to the 70-79 y.o. cohort and significantly longer operative time (P = .04) compared to the 60-69 y.o. cohort. Octogenarian patients do not face much riskier outcomes following elective ACDF procedures than do younger elderly patients. Age alone should not be used to screen patients for ACDF.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of giant cervical disc herniation

ObjectiveGiant cervical disc herniation (GCDH) was defined as a herniated intervertebral disc that accounted for more than 50% of the spinal canal. The purpose of this study was to analyse the feasibility of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of GCDH.MethodsPatient demographic and imaging data, clinical results, and perioperative complications were analysed retrospectively.ResultsA total of 23 patients were included in the study. Spinal cord recovery pulsation was observed under a microscope in all cases. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging showed complete decompression of the spinal cord and no residual intervertebral disc. The patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months. The average visual analogue scale score and Neck Disability Index decreased from 8.6 ± 0.5 and 86.0 ± 2.7% to 2.2 ± 0.2 and 26.7 ± 2.0%, respectively, three days after surgery. The average Japanese Orthopedic Association score increased from 6.9 ± 2.1 to 13.9 ± 1.1. The cervical spinal cord function improvement rate was 69.3%. No neurological complications after surgery were observed.ConclusionThis study shows that ACDF is feasible for the treatment of GCDH disease. The results indicate that this approach can be used to safely remove herniated disc fragments, effectively relieve compression of the spinal cord, and improve neurological function.

Multilevel Cervical Disk Arthroplasty: Moving Beyond Two Levels.

Cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) is well-studied for 1-level and 2-level cervical pathology. There is an increasing trend towards its utilization for greater than 2-level disease as an alternative to the gold standard, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The number of high-level, prospective studies or randomized trials regarding multilevel CDA is limited but continues to grow as the procedure gains popularity. In appropriately indicated patients with multilevel disease caused by disk herniations or spondylosis without extensive facet arthropathy, CDA shows promising results. Multilevel CDA should be avoided in patients with prior spinal trauma, significant degenerative spondylolisthesis with translation, arthrodesis without mobility, severely incompetent facet joints, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, or kyphotic deformity. With overall similar risk profiles to ACDF but lower theoretical rates of pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease, multilevel CDA has been shown to preserve, or perhaps even increase, preoperative cervical range of motion. There are negligible differences in postoperative neck and arm pain, VAS scores, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, and Neck Disability Index scores when comparing multilevel CDA and ACDF. Despite current indications for multilevel CDA largely being based on single and 2-level data, careful patient selection is critical. Expansion of indications can be expected as literature continues to emerge regarding outcomes and complications in multilevel CDA, as well as with improvements in prosthesis design.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel individualized zero-profile cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for treating symptomatic cervical degenerative disease. The cage and plate constructs (CPCs) are widely employed in ACDF to maintain spinal stability and to provide immediate support. However, several instrument-related complications such as dysphagia, cage subsidence, and adjacent segment degeneration have been reported in the previous literature. This study aimed to design a novel individualized zero-profile (NIZP) cage and evaluate its potential to enhance the biomechanical performance between the instrument and the cervical spine. Methods: The intact finite element models of C3-C7 were constructed and validated. A NIZP cage was designed based on the anatomical parameters of the subject's C5/6. The ACDF procedure was simulated and the CPCs and NIZP cage were implanted separately. The range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and peak von Mises stresses of annulus fibrosus were compared between the two surgical models after ACDF under four motion conditions. Additionally, the biomechanical performance of the CPCs and NIZP cage were evaluated. Results: Compared with the intact model, the ROM of the surgical segment was significantly decreased for both surgical models under four motion conditions. Additionally, there was an increase in IDP and peak von Mises stress of annulus fibrosus in the adjacent segment. The NIZP cage had a more subtle impact on postoperative IDP and peak von Mises stress of annulus fibrosus in adjacent segments compared to CPCs. Meanwhile, the peak von Mises stresses of the NIZP cage were reduced by 90.0-120.0 MPa, and the average von Mises stresses were reduced by 12.61-17.56MPa under different motion conditions. Regarding the fixation screws, the peak von Mises stresses in the screws of the NIZP cage increased by 10.0-40.0MPa and the average von Mises stresses increased by 2.37-10.10MPa. Conclusion: The NIZP cage could effectively reconstruct spinal stability in ACDF procedure by finite element study. Compared with the CPCs, the NIZP cage had better biomechanical performance, with a lower stress distribution on the cage and a more moderate effect on the adjacent segmental discs. Therefore, the NIZP cage could prevent postoperative dysphagia as well as decrease the risk of subsidence and adjacent disc degeneration following ACDF. In addition, this study could serve as a valuable reference for the development of personalized instruments.

Development of a novel PLDLA/β-TCP composite-based biodegradable anterior cervical plate and screw system.

We investigated the effectiveness and safety of a new composite-based biodegradable anterior cervical plate/screw (ACPS) system for the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) fixation. A biocomposite in combination with 30 wt% β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP; a biodegradable ceramic having osteoconductive ability) and 70 wt% poly-l/d-lactide copolymer (PLDLA; a biodegradable polymer) was developed and used in the ACPS device, comprising one plate and four screws for fixation. Based on a literature review, a clinically required period of performance maintenance was set as 16 weeks, and to verify the performance for a period of 16 weeks or more, the test was conducted for 26 weeks. Following ISO 13781:2017 testing protocols, an in vitro degradation test was performed to verify the performance and evaluate the decomposition characteristics of the biodegradable ACPS system. Using an animal model as a preclinical investigation, the prepared ACPS device was implanted into five mongrel dogs weighing over 30 kg to evaluate the detachment prevention effect of the ACPS system on polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cage after ACDF. By week 26, the molecular weight was decreased by 45.35% for the plate and 52.56% for the screw; the bending strength of the plate was decreased by approximately 26.2% when compared with the initial stage. The torsional yield strength and pullout strength of the screw was increased by 52.31% and 5.3%, respectively by week 2 and then subsequently decreased until week 26. No detachment or dislocation of the inserted PEEK cage was observed for 26 weeks in vivo study. These findings recommend that the ACPS system might be a promising biodegradable tool for the fixation of interbody implants and supporting the fusion in an ACDF model. Furthermore, additional clinical trials are planned for the future.

No Difference in Surgical Outcomes Between Stand-Alone Devices and Anterior Plating for 1-2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A 1:1 Exact Matched Analysis.

Retrospective cohort. To compare rates of all-cause surgical and medical complications between zero-profile (ZP; stand-alone) implants versus any graft type with an anterior plate in patients undergoing 1-2 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for treatment of degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy. Degenerative cervical myeloradiculopathy is increasingly prevalent in older adults. ACDF is a common surgical procedure for decompression of neural structures and stabilization and has been shown to have excellent outcomes. Although ACDFs performed with graft and plate have been the gold standard, more recently, ZP implants were developed to decrease implant-related complications, such as severe postoperative dysphagia. However, there is a paucity of papers comparing the surgical and medical complications profile of ZP (stand-alone) implants to grafts with plating systems. Data were extracted from the PearlDiver Mariner Database using Current Procedural Terminology codes to classify patients into 1 level, 2 levels, and a total of 1-2 level ACDFs. Patients undergoing surgery for non-degenerative pathologies such as tumors, trauma, or infection were excluded. 1:1 exact matching created 2 equal groups of 7284 patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDF with either grafting with a plate or ZP (stand-alone) implant. There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause surgical complications, pseudarthrosis rate, dysphagia, or need for revision surgery between both cohorts (risk ratio: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80-1.21, P = 0.95). In addition, all-cause medical complications were similar between both cohorts (risk ratio: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.862-1.330, P = 0.573) or any specific surgical or medical complication included in this study. After 1:1 exact matching, the results of this study suggest that ZP (stand-alone) implants have similar outcomes compared with grafts with plating systems, with no observed differences in all-cause surgical or medical complications profile.

Synthetic Interbody Devices and Traditional Bone Graft Are Associated With a Similar Rate of Surgical Complications After 1-2 Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions.

Retrospective cohort. To compare the rates of all-cause surgical complications of synthetic interbody devices versus allograft or autograft in patients undergoing 1-2 levels anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Cervical degenerative disorders affect up to 60% of older adults in the United States. Both traditional allograft or autograft and synthetic interbody devices (polyetheretherketone or titanium) are used for decompression and arthrodesis, with increasing utilization of the latter. However, the differences in their postsurgical complication profiles are not well-characterized. Patients who underwent 1-2 level ACDFs for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy between 2010 and 2022 were identified using the PearlDiver Mariner all-claims insurance database. Patients undergoing surgery for nondegenerative pathologies, such as tumors, trauma, or infection, were excluded. 1:1 exact matching was performed based on factors that were significant predictors of all-cause surgical complications in a linear regression model. The primary outcome measure was the development of all-cause surgical complications after 1-2 level ACDFs. The secondary outcome was all-cause medical complications. 1:1 exact matching resulted in two equal groups of 11,430 patients who received treatment with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autograft. No statistically significant difference in all-cause surgical complications was found between the synthetic cohort and the allograft or autograft cohort after 1-2 level ACDFs (Relative Risk: 0.86, 95% confidence interval: 0.730-1.014, P = 0.079). No significant differences were observed regarding any specific surgical complications except for pseudoarthrosis (Relative Risk: 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.554-0.974, P = 0.037), which was higher in the allograft/autograft cohort. After 1:1 exact matching to control for confounding variables, the findings of this study suggest that all-cause surgical complications are similar in patients undergoing ACDFs with synthetic interbody devices or allograft/autographs. However, the rate of pseudarthrosis appears to be higher in patients with allograft/autographs. Future prospective studies are needed to corroborate these findings.