Anterior Cervical Discectomy And Fusion Patients Research Articles

Perioperative inpatient falls for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion patients are on the rise: Risk factors associated with this “never event”

Patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) often have brief inpatient stays and may be at risk for inpatient falls (IPFs). Such IPFs should be preventable and have been termed a "never event" by the National Quality Forum, an affiliate of The Joint Commission. Despite increasing attention to IPF prevention, no studies have investigated the incidence, trends, and factors associated with IPFs among ACDF patients. To characterize the trends in the incidence of ACDF-related IPFs and their risk factors. Retrospective cohort study. Adult patients who underwent inpatient ACDF between 2010 and Q3 2022 were abstracted from a large, national, multi-insurance administrative claims database. Incidence, trends, and factors associated with IPFs. Adult patients who had undergone single or multi-level inpatient ACDF were identified by administrative coding. Exclusion criteria included: patients <18 years of age, those who underwent outpatient ACDF, concurrent posterior cervical procedures, thoracic or lumbar fusion, and those with trauma, neoplasm, or infection diagnosed within 90-days prior to surgery. The subset of patients who suffered an IPF were subsequently identified. The annual incidence of IPFs was analyzed over the study years and various risk factors were assessed for their correlation with IPFs by multivariable logistic regression. To determine the association between IPF and length of stay (LOS), patients with relative to without IPF were matched 1:4 based on age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) and compared by multivariable logistic regression. Of the 294,165 inpatient ACDF patients meeting inclusion criteria, IPFs were identified for 5,548 (1.9%). Between 2010 and Q3 2022, the annual incidence of IPFs increased from 309 (1.1%) to 515 (4.8%) for patients undergoing ACDF (p<.001). Independent predictors of an IPF were: hospital-acquired delirium (odds ratio [OR] 4.50), history of prior falls (OR 3.38), hospital-acquired psychosis (OR 3.17), alcohol use disorder (OR 2.68), cervical myelopathy (relative to radiculopathy) (OR 2.66), socioeconomically disadvantaged patients (OR 1.85), history of dementia (OR 1.77), underweight body mass index (BMI <18.5) (OR 1.67), multi-level ACDF (OR 1.43), history of prior cervical surgery (OR 1.41), male sex (OR 1.37), Medicaid insurance (OR 1.34), older age (OR 1.33), patients in the northeast United States (OR 1.15), and obese BMI >30 (OR 1.15) (p<.001 for all). Relative to patients without IPF, patients who suffered an IPF following ACDF demonstrated incrementally increasing odds of extended LOS (4-5 days [OR 2.63], 6 to 7 days [OR 3.85], 7+ days [OR 6.78]) (p<.001 for all). In this robust national sample of patients undergoing inpatient ACDF, IPFs were identified for 1.9%, with an increasing annual incidence over the years. Among these patients, various factors were associated with their occurrence, many of which may be potentially modifiable. These findings have major clinical implications on care pathway optimization regarding early identification of high-risk patients undergoing ACDF and lays a foundation for the refinement of multidisciplinary fall prevention programs.

Impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea on Outcomes after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Study Design. Retrospective Cohort Objective. To evaluate the impact of having a history of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) on postoperative outcomes. Summary of Background Data. With an aging population and rates of obesity increasing, comorbidities that influence patient safety are increasingly common. One frequently overlooked comorbidity is OSA which affects nearly 24% of the population. Despite its prevalence, the impact of OSA on outcomes following ACDF is poorly understood. Methods. A retrospective analysis of patients &gt;18 years who underwent 1-4 level ACDF at an academic medical center from 2014-2020 was performed. Patient’s age, sex, BMI, CCI, hypertension, diabetes, and levels fused were propensity matched in a 3:1 fashion. Outcomes assessed included inpatient complications, 30 and 90-day ED visits, 30 and 90-day readmissions, reoperations, and one-year PROMs. Results. A total of 344 ACDF patients (86 OSA, 258 No OSA) were included. 30-day ED visits were higher among the OSA compared to the non-OSA group (5.85% vs 0%, P=0.001). Among ED visits, there were 2 patients with pneumonia, 1 with dysphagia, and 1 with extremity weakness, none of which warranted readmission. ED visits equalized in the 30–90-day window. There were no significant differences in inpatient complications, LOS, discharge disposition, readmissions, reoperations, and one-year PROMs. Conclusion. Patients with a history of OSA underwent ACDF without an increased risk of postoperative complications, readmissions, or reoperations and experienced a complication rate much lower than previously suggested by current literature. OSA patients experienced similar improvements in PROMs at 1-year follow-up. Surgeons should counsel OSA patients regarding the increased risk of 30-day ED visits. But overall, patients can expect safe and equivalent outcomes compared to non-OSA patients which lends support for safe outpatient surgery in this population.

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Is Safe Across Various Obesity Levels

As surgical indications for cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) continue to expand, a growing patient population is now becoming indicated for this procedure. Little is known about whether CDA is safe in the overweight and obese populations, and how this procedure compares to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in this particular demographic. To evaluate the outcomes of CDA across varying levels of body mass indices and to compare these to ACDF. Retrospective cohort study. A total of 12,454 patients who underwent CDA and 45,513 patients who underwent ACDF between 2011 and 2020 were included in this study. The following data were observed for all cases: patient demographics, complications, revisions. The PearlDiver database was queried to identify all adults who underwent single-level CDA. Patients were stratified by body mass index (BMI), defined as Healthy Weight (<25kg/m2), Overweight (25-30kg/m2), Obese (30-40kg/m2), and Morbidly Obese (>40kg/m2). Patient demographics and comorbidities were compared before matching, and medical and surgical complications were compared after matching for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Similar comparative analyses were performed on all obese patients (>30kgm/2) who underwent single-level CDA and single-level ACDF. In total, 1907 Healthy Weight, 3295 Overweight, 5431 Obese, and 1821 Morbidly Obese patients were included. The mean age was between 45.43 and 47.41 years, 57.12% and 71.68% were female, and mean CCI was 1.16-1.73 across groups (all p<.001). Mean CCI (Healthy Weight=1.16, Overweight=1.31, Obese=1.47, Morbidly Obese=1.63) and rate of comorbidities, such as diabetes (19.19%, 25.74%, 37.51%, 48.65%), hypertension (45.20%, 56.18%, 69.21%, 76.22%), and hyperlipidemia (49.34%, 60.61%, 65.33%, 64.96%), generally increased with increasing BMI (p<.001). After matching, mean age was 44.59 years, 70.98% were female, and mean CCI was 1.07 for all groups. At 90 days postoperatively, medical complications, including infection, wound dehiscence, and readmissions, were comparable (p>.05). At 2 years postoperatively, anterior revision was higher in Healthy Weight patients (30.27%, 28.11%, 24.71%, 24.96%, p=.005) but other surgical complications, including dysphagia, dysphonia, and implant failure, were otherwise comparable (p>.05). Comparison of all obese patients across cervical procedures revealed higher rates of 90-day emergency department visits (ACDF=21.56% vs 16.65%, p<.001) and 1-year hardware removal (1.49% vs 0.81%, p=.002), wound exploration (0.73% vs 0.35%, p=.018), and posterior fusion (1.14% vs 0.44%, p<.001) and lower rates of anterior revision (18.82% vs 23.68%, p<.001) in ACDF patients compared to CDA patients. CDA may be safe across varying levels of obesity without any appreciable change in medical and surgical complications. In addition, single-level ACDF may result in higher complications than single-level CDA in the obese population.

Impact of congenital spinal stenosis on the outcome of three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective study.

To investigate whether congenital cervical spinal stenosis (CCSS) affects the outcome of three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). One hundred seventeen patients with CSM who underwent three-level ACDF between January 2019 and January 2023 were retrospectively examined. Patients were grouped according to presence of CCSS, which was defined as Pavlov ratio ≤ 0.75. The CCSS and no CCSS groups comprised 68 (58.1%) and 49 (41.9%) patients, respectively. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score did not significantly differ between the two groups at any postoperative time point (p > 0.05). The JOA improvement rate was lower in the CCSS group 1 month after surgery (41.7% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.05), but showed no difference at any follow-up time point after one month. Multivariate logistic regression identified preoperative age (OR = 10.639), JOA score (OR = 0.370), increased signal intensity (ISI) in the spinal cord on T2-weighted MRI (T2-WI) (Grade 1: OR = 6.135; Grade 2: OR = 29.892), and degree of spinal cord compression (30-60%: OR = 17.919; ≥60%: OR = 46.624) as independent predictors of a poor oneyear outcome (JOA recovery rate < 50%). Although early JOA improvement is slower in the CCSS group, it does not affect the final neurological improvement at 1 year. Therefore, CCSS should not be considered a contraindication for three-level ACDF in patients with CSM. The main factors influencing oneyear outcome were preoperative age, JOA score, ISI grade, and degree of spinal cord compression.

Outcomes following two-level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Relative to two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy.

Retrospective cohort study. To evaluate postoperative adverse events, readmissions, and five-year survival to reoperation for two-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) relative to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). CDA and ACDF are both treatment options for degenerative cervical spine pathology. Relative to ACDF, CDA is a relatively novel treatment option, and limited research exists comparing outcomes between two-level CDA and two-level ACDF. Patients undergoing two-level CDA or two-level ACDF were isolated from the PearlDiver M165Ortho database. These two cohorts were matched 1:1 based on patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores. The odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events were compared between the two groups by multivariable analysis. Overall cost-of-care for the first 90-days postoperatively, and five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation were then assessed. Of the two-level cases identified, only 3.9% had CDA and the rest had ACDF. After matching, there were 4,224 patients in each of the study groups. With controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI on multivariable analysis, two-level CDA patients had significantly lower odds of experiencing 90-day dysphagia (OR 0.60, P<0.0001 driving aggregated any adverse event [OR 0.65, P<0.0001]) and readmission (OR 0.69, P=0.0002). Median 90-day cost of care was greater for two-level ACDF patients ($4,776.00 vs. $3,191.00, P<0.0001). No significant difference in five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation was identified (P=0.7). Relative to two-level ACDF patients, two-level CDA patients were found to have significantly lower odds of 90-day readmissions and minor adverse events (dysphagia), while rates of major adverse events (pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, etc.) were comparable between the groups. Further CDA patients had lower cost of overall care, but no difference in five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation. Thus, it may be appropriate to further consider CDA when two-level surgery is pursued.

Curative effect analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type

To investigate the clinical effect of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical spondylosis of vertebral artery type(CSA). The clinical data of 42 patients with CSA from January 2020 to January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 25 males and 17 females, aged from 30 to 74 years old with an average of (53.9±11.0) years old. There were 18 cases with single-segment lesions, 17 cases with two-segment lesions, and 7 cases with three-segment lesions. The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery's Hearing and Balance Committee score (CHE), the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the cervical curvature Cobb angle were recorded before surgery and after surgery at 6 months. All 42 ACDF patients were followed up for 6 to 30 months with an average of (14.0±5.2) months. The operative time ranged from 95 to 220 min with an average of (160.38±36.77) min, the intraoperative blood loss ranged from 30 to 85 ml with an average of (53.60±18.98) ml. Tow patients had mild postoperative dysphagia, which improved with symptomatic treatment such as nebulized inhalation. CHE score decreased from (4.05±0.96) preoperatively to (2.40±0.70) at 6 months postoperatively (t=12.97, P<0.05). The number of improved vertigo at 6 months postoperatively was 38, with an improvement rate of 90.5%. NDI score was reduced from (34.43±8.04) preoperatively to (20.76±3.91) at 6 months postoperatively (t=11.83, P<0.05). The cervical curvature Cobb angle improved from (8.04±6.70)° preoperatively to (12.42±5.23)° at 6 months postoperatively (t=-15.96, P<0.05). The ACDF procedure has outstanding clinical efficacy in treating CSA. The operation can rapidly relieve patients' episodic vertigo symptoms by relieving bony compression and reconstructing cervical curvature. However, it is necessary to strictly grasp the indications for surgery and clarify the causes of vertigo in patients, and ACDF surgery is recommended for CSA patients for whom conservative treatment is ineffective.

Preoperative Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: Utilization and Postoperative Complications in ACDF, PCDF, and Decompression.

Retrospective cohort study. Identify factors associated with cervical epidural steroid injection (CESI) receipt before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), or decompression; evaluate the association between CESI receipt and 90-day postoperative complications; and determine characteristics of CESI associated with complications. Previous literature has suggested that a preoperative CESI may increase the risk of postoperative complications. However, these studies were limited in the procedures and complications they evaluated. The IBM MarketScan database was queried for patients aged 18 years or older who underwent ACDF, PCDF, or cervical decompression for disc herniation, stenosis, radiculopathy, myelopathy, and/or spondylosis without myelopathy between January 1, 2014 and September 30, 2020. CESI receipt within 12 months preoperatively, injection characteristics, and postoperative complications were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between patient characteristics and receipt of CESI, receipt of a CESI and each 90-day postoperative complication, and CESI characteristics and each 90-day complication. Among the unique patients who underwent each procedure, 20,371 ACDF patients (30.93%), 1259 (22.24%) PCDF patients, and 3349 (36.30%) decompression patients received a preoperative CESI. In all 3 cohorts, increasing age, increasing comorbidity burden, smoker status, and diagnosis of myelopathy were associated with decreased odds of preoperative CESI receipt, while female sex and diagnosis of radiculopathy and spondylosis without myelopathy were associated with increased odds. There were no meaningful between-group comparisons or significant associations between preoperative CESI receipt and any 90-day postoperative complications in multivariable models (all P >0.05). This study elucidated the main determinants of CESI receipt and found no differences in the odds of developing 90-day postoperative complications, but did identify differential outcomes with regard to some injection characteristics. Level III.

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA) versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for Two-Level Cervical Disc Degenerative Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are both considered to be efficacious surgical procedures for treating cervical spondylosis in patients with or without compression myelopathy. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of these procedures for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) at two contiguous levels. Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to 1 May 2023. Studies comparing the outcomes between CDA and ACDF in patients with two-level cervical DDD were eligible for inclusion. Primary outcomes were surgical success rates and secondary surgery rates. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, as well as the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for the severity of cervical compression myelopathy and complication rates. Results: In total, eight studies (two RCTs, four retrospective studies, and two prospective studies) with a total of 1155 patients (CDA: 598; ACDF: 557) were included. Pooled results revealed that CDA was associated with a significantly higher overall success rate (OR, 2.710, 95% CI: 1.949-3.770) and lower secondary surgery rate (OR, 0.254, 95% CI: 0.169-0.382) compared to ACDF. In addition, complication rates were significantly lower in the CDA group than in the ACDF group (OR, 0.548, 95% CI: 0.326 to 0.919). CDA was also associated with significantly greater improvements in neck pain VAS than ACDF. No significant differences were found in improvements in the arm VAS, NDI, and JOA scores between the two procedures. Conclusions: CDA may provide better postoperative outcomes for surgical success, secondary surgery, pain reduction, and postoperative complications than ACDF for treating patients with two-level cervical DDD.

Advanced chronic kidney disease increases complications in anterior cervical discectomies with fusions: An analysis of 75,508 patients

Although anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures for cervical spine disease have been increasing amid a growing population of patients with kidney dysfunction, there is a scarcity of literature focusing on kidney dysfunction as a risk-factor for post-operative ACDF complications. The purpose is to evaluate the differential impact of kidney dysfunction on perioperative outcomes including surgical and medical complications, extended length of hospital stay (LOS), and death within 30 days following ACDF. This was a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who had undergone an elective ACDF procedure between 2011-2021 using Current Procedural Terminology code 22551. Patients were categorized into five cohorts based on eGFR according to the "Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes" Classification: values of: ≥ 90(reference cohort), 60-89 (G2), 30-59 (G3), 15-29 (G4), and <15 (G5). One-way ANOVA for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables were used to identify differences in perioperative variables between the five groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the effect of kidney dysfunction on post-operative surgical outcomes. Significance was defined as p<.05. About 75,508 ACDF patients were included, of who 57,480 were G1, 15,186 were G2, 2,192 were G3, 312 were G4, and 338 were G5. G4 and G5 independently increased the risk of medical complications (OR: 1.893, 95% CI [1.296-2.705]; OR: 2.241, 95% CI [1.222-3.964]) and blood transfusion. Only G5 independently increased the risk for extended LOS (OR: 2.410, 95% CI [1.281-4.371], p=.005). High grade CKD is an independent risk factor for medical complications, extended hospital LOS, and blood transfusions following ACDF, underscoring the importance of risk stratification to optimize perioperative management and reduce the burden of complications and healthcare costs. Conversely, low grade CKD does not increase the risk of complications in ACDF.

A Novel Method for Tracking Neck Motions Using a Skin-Conformable Wireless Accelerometer: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Cervical spine disease is a leading cause of pain and disability. Degenerative conditions of the spine can result in neurologic compression of the cervical spinal cord or nerve roots and may be surgically treated with an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in up to 137,000 people per year in the United States. A common sequelae of ACDF is reduced cervical range of motion (CROM) with patient-based complaints of stiffness and neck pain. Currently, tools for assessment of CROM are manual, subjective, and only intermittently utilized during doctor or physical therapy visits. We propose a skin-mountable acousto-mechanic sensor (ADvanced Acousto-Mechanic sensor; ADAM) as a tool for continuous neck motion monitoring in postoperative ACDF patients. We have developed and validated a machine learning neck motion classification algorithm to differentiate between eight neck motions (right/left rotation, right/left lateral bending, flexion, extension, retraction, protraction) in healthy normal subjects and patients. Methods: Sensor data from 12 healthy normal subjects and 5 patients were used to develop and validate a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Results: An average algorithm accuracy of 80.0 ± 3.8% was obtained for healthy normal subjects (94% for right rotation, 98% for left rotation, 65% for right lateral bending, 87% for left lateral bending, 89% for flexion, 77% for extension, 50% for retraction, 84% for protraction). An average accuracy of 67.5 ± 5.8% was obtained for patients. Discussion: ADAM, with our algorithm, may serve as a rehabilitation tool for neck motion monitoring in postoperative ACDF patients. Sensor-captured vital signs and other events (extubation, vocalization, physical therapy, walking) are potential metrics to be incorporated into our algorithm to offer more holistic monitoring of patients after cervical spine surgery.

Comparing posterior cervical foraminotomy with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in radiculopathic patients: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.

The objective of this study was to compare clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) between posterior foraminotomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in patients presenting with cervical radiculopathy. The Quality Outcomes Database was queried for patients who had undergone ACDF or posterior foraminotomy for radiculopathy. To create two highly homogeneous groups, optimal individual matching was performed at a 5:1 ratio between the two groups on 29 baseline variables (including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, symptoms, patient-reported scores, underlying pathologies, and levels treated). Outcomes of interest were length of stay, reoperations, patient-reported satisfaction, increase in EQ-5D score, and decrease in Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores for arm and neck pain as long as 1 year after surgery. Noninferiority analysis of achieving patient satisfaction and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in PROs was performed with an accepted risk difference of 5%. A total of 7805 eligible patients were identified: 216 of these underwent posterior foraminotomy and were matched to 1080 patients who underwent ACDF. The patients who underwent ACDF had more underlying pathologies, lower EQ-5D scores, and higher NDI and neck pain scores at baseline. Posterior foraminotomy was associated with shorter hospitalization (0.5 vs 0.9 days, p < 0.001). Reoperations within 12 months were significantly more common among the posterior foraminotomy group (4.2% vs 1.9%, p = 0.04). The two groups performed similarly in PROs, with posterior foraminotomy being noninferior to ACDF in achieving MCID in EQ-5D and neck pain scores but also having lower rates of maximal satisfaction at 12 months (North American Spine Society score of 1 achieved by 65.2% posterior foraminotomy patients vs 74.6% of ACDF patients, p = 0.02). The two procedures were found to be offered to different populations, with ACDF being selected for patients with more complicated pathologies and symptoms. After individual matching, posterior foraminotomy was associated with a higher reoperation risk within 1 year after surgery compared to ACDF (4.2% vs 1.9%). In terms of 12-month PROs, posterior foraminotomy was noninferior to ACDF in improving quality of life and neck pain. The two procedures also performed similarly in improving NDI scores and arm pain, but ACDF patients had higher maximal satisfaction rates.

Is single-level cervical disc arthroplasty associated with a lower reoperation rate than anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Long-term meta-analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) trials report lower rates of subsequent cervical spine surgical procedures with CDA compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The objective of this study was to compare the rate of subsequent cervical spine surgery in single-level CDA-treated patients to that of a matched cohort of single-level ACDF-treated patients by using records from 2010 to 2021 included in a large national administrative claims database (PearlDiver). This retrospective matched-cohort study used a large national insurance claims database; 525,510 patients who had undergone a single-level ACDF or CDA between 2010 and 2021 were identified. Patients with other same-day spine procedures, as well as those for trauma, infection, or tumor, were excluded, yielding 148,531 patients. ACDF patients were matched 2:1 to CDA patients on the basis of clinical and demographic characteristics. The primary outcome was the overall incidence of all-cause cervical reoperation after index surgery. Secondary outcomes included readmission, any adverse event within 90 days, and overall reintervention after index surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adjusted for covariates and were employed to estimate the effect of the index ACDF or CDA procedure on patient outcomes. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimation, and differences between ACDF- and CDA-treated patients were compared using log-rank tests. After the patients were matched, 28,795 ACDF patients to 14,504 CDA patients were included. ACDF patients had higher rates of 90-day adverse events (18.4% vs 14.6%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.82, p < 0.001) and readmission (11.5% vs 9.7%, aOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.93, p < 0.001). Over a mean 4.3 years of follow-up, 5.0% of ACDF patients and 5.4% of CDA patients underwent reoperation (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.19, p = 0.059). The rate of aggregate reintervention was higher in CDA patients than in ACDF patients (11.7% vs 10.7%, aOR 1.10, p = 0.002). The Kaplan-Meier 10-year reoperation-free survival rate was worse for CDA than ACDF (91.0% vs 92.0%, p = 0.05), as was the rate of reintervention-free survival (81.2% vs 82.0%, p = 0.003). Single-level CDA was associated with a similar rate of reoperation and higher rate of subsequent injections when compared with a matched cohort that underwent single-level ACDF. CDA was associated with lower rates of 90-day adverse events and readmissions.

Interim 1-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Hydroxyapatite-Infused Polyetheretherketone Interbody Cages.

This is a multicenter observational registry analysis of 1-year radiographic and clinical outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using hydroxyapatite (HA)-infused polyetheretherketone (PEEK) intervertebral cages. Radiographic and clinical outcome data were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. To assess fusion, dynamic flexion-extension radiographs were independently evaluated with a validated method. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the following disease-specific measures: Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for neck, left arm, and right arm pain. Patient satisfaction was also evaluated. A total of 789 ACDF patients (men: 51.5%/women: 48.5%; mean body mass index: 29.9 kg/m2) were included at the time of analysis, and 1565 segments have been operated. Successful fusion was confirmed in 91.3% of all operated levels after 6 months and 92.2% after 12 months. Mean NDI scores improved significantly (P < 0.01) preoperatively (46.3, n = 771) to postoperatively (12 months: 25.2, n = 281). Consistently, mean VAS neck (preoperative: 64.2, n = 770; 12 months: 28.6, n = 278), VAS right arm (preoperative: 42.6, n = 766; 12 months: 20.4, n = 277), and VAS left arm (preoperative: 41.1, n = 768; 12 months: 20.8, n = 277) decreased significantly (P < 0.01). Patients reported high satisfaction rates after surgery with no significant changes in postoperative patient satisfaction between 6 weeks and 12 months (95.1%, n = 273). ACDF with HA-infused PEEK cages demonstrates promising radiographic and clinical outcomes, supporting the potential benefits of incorporating HA into PEEK cages to enhance fusion rates and improve patient outcomes. This study demonstrates a >90% fusion rate by level with reliable improvements in patient reported outcomes, along with a high rate of patient satisfaction, in a large patient cohort undergoing ACDF with HA-infused PEEK cages. 2 .

Optimizing Patient Outcomes in Spinal Surgery: An Investigation Into Anesthesiologists' Case Volume.

Introduction Nearly one million patients in the United States undergo spine surgical procedures annually to seek relief from chronic back and neck pain. A multidisciplinary approach is key to ensuring the efficiency and safety of the surgical process, with the anesthesia team, nursing, surgeon, and healthcare facilities all playing a role. The purpose of this study is to capture potential associations between the anesthesiologists' case volume and patient postoperative outcomes in the early recovery period. Methods A retrospective review of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), lumbar decompression (LD), and lumbar fusion (LF) patients from July 2019 to June 2023 was performed. Anesthesiologists were categorized into low, medium, and high volumes of spine surgical cases. Univariate analysis was performed on patient demographics, intraoperative measures, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) measures, and postoperative measures by anesthesiologist volume. Results This study included 545 ACDF, 815 LD, and 1,144 LF patients. There were no differences between groups in ACDF patients by anesthesiologist volume. When examining patients undergoing LD, there was a difference in patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of three or greater (low volume: 41.7% vs. medium volume: 53.7% vs. high volume: 45.0%; p=0.029). When examining patients undergoing LF, there were differences in patients with low temperatures in PACU (low volume: 2.8% vs. medium volume: 7.3% vs. high volume: 4.2%; p=0.044) and the percentage of patients with a 90-day emergency department return (low volume: 7.7% vs. medium volume: 11.9% vs. high volume: 7.0%; p=0.024). Conclusion While this study found a minimal impact of anesthesiologist volume on postoperative outcomes, recent literature has emphasized the critical role of teamwork and specialized surgical teams to enhance efficiency and patient care. Further studies are warranted to identify other variables in anesthesia, nursing, and surgical team workflow that may impact postoperative outcomes in spinal surgeries.

Predicting conversion of ambulatory ACDF patients to inpatient: a machine learning approach

Machine learning is a powerful tool that has become increasingly important in the orthopedic field. Recently, several studies have reported that predictive models could provide new insights into patient risk factors and outcomes. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common operation that is performed as an outpatient procedure. However, some patients are required to convert to inpatient status and prolonged hospitalization due to their condition. Appropriate patient selection and identification of risk factors for conversion could provide benefits to patients and the use of medical resources. This study aimed to develop a machine-learning algorithm to identify risk factors associated with unplanned conversion from outpatient to inpatient status for ACDF patients. This is a machine-learning-based analysis using retrospectively collected data. Patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF in an ambulatory setting at a single specialized orthopedic hospital between February 2016 to December 2021. Length of stay, conversion rates from ambulatory setting to inpatient. Patients were divided into two groups based on length of stay: (1) Ambulatory (discharge within 24 hours) or Extended Stay (greater than 24 hours but fewer than 48 hours), and (2) Inpatient (greater than 48 hours). Factors included in the model were based on literature review and clinical expertise. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and intraoperative factors, such as surgery duration and time, were included. We compared the performance of different machine learning algorithms: Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). We split the patient data into a training and validation dataset using a 70/30 split. The different models were trained in the training dataset using cross-validation. The performance was then tested in the unseen validation set. This step is important to detect overfitting. The performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC) as the primary outcome. An AUC of 0.7 was considered fair, 0.8 good, and 0.9 excellent, according to established cut-offs. A total of 581 patients (59% female) were available for analysis. Of those, 140 (24.1%) were converted to inpatient status. The median age was 51 (IQR 44-59), and the median BMI was 28 kg/m2 (IQR 24-32). The XGBoost model showed the best performance with an AUC of 0.79. The most important features were the length of the operation, followed by sex (based on biological attributes), age, and operation start time. The logistic regression model and the SVM showed worse results, with an AUC of 0.71 each. This study demonstrated a novel approach to predicting conversion to inpatient status in eligible patients for ambulatory surgery. The XGBoost model showed good predictive capabilities, superior to the older machine learning approaches. This model also revealed the importance of surgical duration time, BMI, and age as risk factors for patient conversion. A developing field of study is using machine learning in clinical decision-making. Our findings contribute to this field by demonstrating the feasibility and accuracy of such methods in predicting outcomes and identifying risk factors, although external and multi-center validation studies are needed.

FORAMINOTOMY VERSUS ACDF FOR PROXIMAL FORAMINAL STENOSIS

AbstractObjectivesThere is still controversy in the literature over whether Cervical Foraminotomy or Anterior Cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is best for treating cervical Radiculopathy. Numerous studies have focused on the respective complication rates of these procedures and outcome measures with a lack of due consideration to preoperative MRI findings. Proximal foraminal stenosis can theoretically be accessed via either approach. We aimed to investigate whether patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) favoured one approach over the other in patients with proximal foraminal stenosis.MethodsA single centre retrospective review of patients undergoing either ACDF or Cervical foraminotomy over the period 2012 to 2022. VAS, Neck disability index (NDI), EQ5DL and Patient Satisfaction on a Five Point Likert scale were obtained. Patients who had both an ACDF and a Foraminotomy were excluded. Axial MRI images were analysed and the location of the worst clinically relevant disc herniation stratified as follows: Central (1), Paracentral (2) and Foraminal (3). Correlations and average PROMs were analysed in SPSS.ResultsPROMs scores were available for 33 ACDF patients and 37 Foraminotomy patients. Average surgery time in ACDF group was 167 minutes while Foraminotomy 142 minutes. Average Length of hospital stay was 6.24 days in the Foraminotomy group and 3.54 days in the ACDF group. 18 patients were excluded due to having both surgeries (2 of which developed CSF leaks postoperatively). Of the included patients there were no postoperative complications. 13 patients in the ACDF had Central or Paracentral stenosis in addition to proximal Foraminal stenosis, 3 patients in the Foraminotomy group had some significant Paracentral herniation just before the Proximal foramen. The majority of patients in both groups had pure proximal Foraminal stenosis (N= 17 (ACDF), 20 (Foraminotomy). The results showed no significant difference in PROMs between patients who received an ACDF or a Foraminotomy for Proximal foraminal stenosis (EQ5DL, NDI, and satisfaction, P= 0.268, 0.253 and 0.327). There was no correlation between location of the stenosis and PROM scores in either group.ConclusionsOur data suggest that Proximal foraminal stenosis can be effectively addressed by either an anterior ACDF or a Foraminotomy with no difference in complication rates. Foraminotomy has the benefit of no implant cost but longer hospital stay.Declaration of Interest(b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project.

The Veterans Rand-12 Physical Composite Score Prognosticates Postoperative Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

To determine prognostic value of preoperative Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) physical composite score (PCS) on outcomes in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). ACDF patients with preoperative VR-12 PCS formed 2 cohorts: VR-12 PCS <35 and VR-12 PCS ≥35. The following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were gathered preoperatively and postoperatively up to 2 years: VR-12 mental composite score (MCS)/PCS, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PF, 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), visual analog scale (VAS) neck/arm pain, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) PCS/MCS. Comparing PROMs change with established thresholds determined achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Univariate analysis compared demographics, perioperative characteristics, and preoperative PROMs. Multivariable regression analysis compared postoperative PROMs and MCID achievement. Of 174 patients, 83 had VR-12 PCS <35. Preoperatively, patients with reduced PF displayed lower patient-reported outcome scores in NDI, PHQ-9, and SF-12 MCS (P ≤ 0.008), but not in VAS arm. At 6 weeks postoperatively, these patients continued to score lower in NDI (P ≤ 0.014) and SF-12 PCS (P ≤ 0.001), among others. By the final check, most scores remained lower (P ≤ 0.002) except for PHQ-9 and VAS arm (P > 0.05). Greater improvements at 6 weeks postoperatively were especially noted in patients with lower initial VR-12 PCS for NDI, PROMIS PF, and SF-12 PCS (P < 0.05). However, by final follow-up, only PROMIS PF showed noteworthy improvement (P= 0.19). Regarding MCID achievement, significant differences were largely absent except in NDI, where patients with reduced PF exhibited more MCID achievement (P= 0.016). ACDF patients with VR-12 PCS <35 experienced inferior PF, mental health, and disability postoperatively until final follow-up. There were no significant differences in postoperative improvement magnitude and MCID achievement. Results suggest that baseline VR-12 PCS in ACDF patients may indicate poorer PF, mental health, and disability postoperatively. However, VR-12 PCS does not limit extent of postoperative improvement.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Cervical Disc Replacement for a Workers' Compensation Population in an Ambulatory Surgical Center.

Retrospective Cohort. To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) achievement outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disk replacement (CDR) in the Workers' Compensation (WC) population. No studies to our knowledge have compared PROMs and MCID attainment between ACDF and CDR among patients with WC insurance undergoing surgery in an outpatient ambulatory surgical center (ASC). WC insurance patients undergoing primary, single/double-level ACDF/CDR in an ASC were identified. Patients were divided into ACDF versus CDR. PROMs were collected at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year timepoints, including PROMIS-PF, SF-12 PCS/MCS, VAS neck/arm, and NDI. Seventy-nine patients were included, 51 ACDF/28 CDR. While operative time (56.4 vs. 54.4min), estimated blood loss (29.2 vs. 25.9mL), POD0 pain (4.9 vs. 3.8), and POD0 narcotic consumption (21.2 vs. 14.5 oral morphine equivalents) were higher in ACDF patients, none reached statistical significance ( P >0.050, all). One-year arthrodesis rate was 100.0% among ACDF recipients with available imaging (n=36). ACDF cohort improved from preoperative for PROMIS-PF from 12 weeks to 1 year, SF-12 PCS at 6 months, all timepoints for VAS neck/arm, and 12 weeks/6 months for NDI ( P ≤0.044, all). CDR cohort improved from preoperative for PROMIS-PF at 6 months, VAS neck/arm from 12 weeks to 1 year, and NDI at 12 weeks/6 months ( P ≤0.049, all). CDR cohort reported significantly lower VAS neck at 12 weeks/1 year and VAS arm at 12 weeks ( P ≤0.039, all). MCID achievement rates did not differ. While operative duration/estimated blood loss/acute postoperative pain/narcotic consumption were, on average, higher among ACDF recipients, these were not statistically significant, possibly due to the limited sample size. ACDF and CDR ASC patients generally demonstrated comparable arm pain/disability/physical function/mental health, though neck pain was significantly lower at multiple timepoints among CDR patients. Clinically meaningful PROM improvements were comparable. Larger, multicentered studies are required to confirm our results.

Superior discrimination of the Risk Analysis Index compared with the 5-item modified frailty index in 30-day outcome prediction after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

The objective of this paper was to compare the predictive ability of the recalibrated Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev) with the 5-item modified frailty index-5 (mFI-5) for postoperative outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This study was performed using data of adult (age > 18 years) ACDF patients obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database during the years 2015-2019. Multivariate modeling and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including area under the curve/C-statistic calculation with the DeLong test, were performed to evaluate the comparative discriminative ability of the RAI-rev and mFI-5 for 5 postoperative outcomes. Both the RAI-rev and mFI-5 were independent predictors of increased postoperative mortality and morbidity in a cohort of 61,441 ACDF patients. In the ROC analysis for 30-day mortality prediction, C-statistics indicated a significantly better performance of the RAI-rev (C-statistic = 0.855, 95% CI 0.852-0.858) compared with the mFI-5 (C-statistic = 0.684, 95% CI 0.680-0.688) (p < 0.001, DeLong test). The results were similar for postoperative ACDF morbidity, Clavien-Dindo grade IV complications, nonhome discharge, and reoperation, demonstrating the superior discriminative ability of the RAI-rev compared with the mFI-5. The RAI-rev demonstrates superior discrimination to the mFI-5 in predicting postoperative ACDF mortality and morbidity. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to document frailty as an independent risk factor for postoperative mortality after ACDF. The RAI-rev has conceptual fidelity to the frailty phenotype and may be more useful than the mFI-5 in preoperative ACDF risk stratification. Prospective validation of these findings is necessary, but patients with high RAI-rev scores may benefit from knowing that they might have an increased surgical risk for ACDF morbidity and mortality.

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Patients with Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease Treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Integrated Interbody Spacers

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is among the most common spine procedures. Adjacent segment disease (ASD), characterized by degenerative disease at an adjacent spinal level to a prior fusion, is a well-recognized and significant sequela following ACDF. Adjacent segment ACDF may be considered after the failure of non-surgical options for patients with symptomatic ASD. This study aimed to assess the incidence of dysphagia and other complications as well as radiographic outcomes in adult patients who have undergone ACDF with an integrated interbody spacer device for symptomatic ASD. This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent ACDF for symptomatic ASD with commercially available integrated interbody spacers by three spine surgeons at an academic institution from March 2018 to April 2022. Demographic, radiographic, and postoperative data were collected, including dysphagia, device-related complications, and the need for revision surgery. There were 48 patients (26 male, 22 female) who met inclusion criteria (mean age 59.7 years, mean body mass index 19.5 kg/m2) who underwent ACDF for symptomatic ASD (1one-level, n= 44; 2-level, n= 4). Overall, 12 patients (25%) experienced dysphagia postoperatively before the first follow-up appointment. Nine of 44 (20.4%) of 1-level ACDF patients experienced dysphagia, and 3 of 4 (75%) of 2-level ACDF patients experienced dysphagia. Three patients had severe dysphagia which prompted an otolaryngology referral. Two of those patients remained symptomatic at 6 weeks postoperatively. Of 43 patients with prior plate cage systems, none required hardware removal at the time of surgery. Preoperative global and segmental lordosis were 9.07° ± 8.36° (P= 0.22) and 3.58° ± 4.57° (P= 0.14), respectively. At 6 weeks postoperatively, global and segmental lordosis were 11.44° ± 9.06° (P= 0.54) and 5.11° ± 4.44° (P= 0.44), respectively. This constitutes a change of+2.37° and+1.53° in global and segmental lordosis, respectively. The mean anterior disc height change between preoperative and immediate postoperative time points was 6.3 ± 3.1 mm. Between the immediate postoperative and 6-week postoperative time points, the mean anterior disc height change was -1.5 ± 2.7 mm. Between the immediate postoperative and 3-month postoperative time points, the mean anterior disc height change was -3.7 ± 5.0 mm. The posterior disc height changes at the same time points were 2.5 ± 1.7 mm, -0.4 ± 1.8. and -0.5 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. This fusion rate was 50% and 70% at 6 months and 1 year post-surgery, respectively. ACDF with integrated spacer is a viable alternative to traditional plate-cage systems for symptomatic ASD. An advantage over traditional plate-cage systems is that the removal of prior instrumentation is not needed in order to place implants. Based on a review of the literature, these standalone systems allowed for a shorter operative time and had less incidence of dysphagia than plate-cage systems for ASD after ACDF. The different standalone and plate-cage systems used in treating ASD after ACDF surgeries should be compared in prospective studies.