Anterior Approach Group Research Articles

TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS: A COMPARISON OF ANTERIOR APPROACH AND TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results and complications of patients who underwent ankle arthrodesis performed by the transfibular approach and anterior approach in end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Between 2016 and 2022, 41 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria for this retrospective comparative analysis were included. Of them, 19 patients are included in the anterior approach group and 22 patients are included in the transfibular approach group. The mean age of the participants is 58.9 years. Collected data included the BMI, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot scale, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, diabetes, smoking, time to fusion, nonunion, union rate, preoperative and postoperative coronal tibiotalar angle and complications. The mean time to bone union was 14.3 weeks (range 11-17 weeks) in the anterior approach group, and 11.3 weeks in the transfibular approach group. Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups. Nonunion occurred in one case in the transfibular approach group and three cases in the anterior approach group. There was no significant difference in the nonunion rate between the both groups (p = 0.321). VAS score, and AOFAS score of the two groups were similar and no significant differences were found (p = 0.491, p = 0.448, p = 0.146, p = 0.073, p = 0.173, p = 0.506, respectively). A stable and firm ankle arthrodesis and plantigrade foot can be achieved with both transfibular approach and anterior approach technique. Level of Evidence III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Posterior hamstring harvest improves aesthetic satisfaction and decreases sensory complications as compared to the classic anterior approach in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery

PurposeThe use of the posterior approach for harvesting hamstring grafts has recently become popular thanks to new all-inside techniques and retrograde drills. This study aims to compare the classic anterior approach with the posterior approach in the popliteal fossa.MethodsRetrospective comparative study of 100 consecutive cases of primary ligamentoplasty performed using ipsilateral semitendinosus autograft with at least one year of follow-up. 50 patients with anterior approach (group A) and 50 patients with posterior approach (P). Ratio men/women: 9/1. Mean age: 32 ± 13 years. Mean operative time: 64.88 ± 12.28 min.Study variablesGraft harvest time; intraoperative complications (semitendinous [ST] tendon cut); postoperative neurological complications (allodynia, paresthesia, pain) or hematoma in the donor area; atrophy of the operated thigh compared to the contralateral thigh, postoperative VAS score, aesthetic satisfaction and overall satisfaction.ResultsGraft harvest time of 9.5 min in group A versus 5.25 min in group P (p < 0.05). Sensory complications: 16% in group A versus 2% in group P (p < 0.05). Regarding the patient’s evaluation of the aesthetic result of the surgery, 80% in group A and 92% in group P were very satisfied, 16% in group A and 8% in group P were satisfied and 4% in group A and no patients in group P not very satisfied (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in terms of total operative time, postoperative joint movement, atrophy of the operated thigh, postoperative VAS, or overall patient satisfaction.ConclusionsThe posterior approach to harvesting the ipsilateral hamstring graft obtained better results than the anterior approach in terms of aesthetic satisfaction of the patient, lower rate of neurological complications (allodynia, paresthesias and hypoesthesia in the anterior region of the knee and leg) and shorter hamstring harvest time.Level of evidenceIV.

Short-term post-operative complications in 207 patients with multi-level degenerative cervical myelopathy: the effect of surgical approach.

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is a common condition often treated by surgical decompression and fusion. The objective of this paper was to compare short-term post-operative complication rates of patients with multi-level DCM treated with decompression and fusion using either an anterior or a posterior cervical approach. A retrospective evaluation of patients' charts, imaging studies and operative reports of patients operated for multilevel subaxial DCM from 2011 to 2016 at a single institution was performed. Patients who were operated upon for the treatment of three stenosed spinal levels or above and who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, or anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion, or posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion, were included. Short-term post-operative complications were compared between the anterior and posterior approaches. Overall, 207 patients were included in this study. 156 were operated via an anterior approach and 51 via a posterior approach. The mean number of treated levels was 3.4 and 4.3 for the anterior and posterior approach groups, respectively (p < 0.001). In the posterior approach group, the proportion of stenosed spinal levels within all operated levels was significantly lower than in the anterior approach group (p = 0.025). Early post-operative neurological status change was favourable for both groups. Deep wound infection rate was significantly higher in the posterior approach group (7.8% vs. none; p = 0.001). Posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion is significantly associated with an increased rate of deep wound infection and wound revision surgery compared to the anterior approach. We recommend the anterior approach as the valid option in treating multi-level DCM.

Intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures: Is distal locking necessary?

IntroductionIntramedullary (IM) nailing of humeral shaft fractures is a reliable means to achieve bone union while allowing early motion. The hypothesis was that distal locking is unnecessary due to good primary stability of the impacted nail in the distal, truncated cone portion of the medullary canal. The primary objective of this study was to confirm the success of the procedure without distal locking by identifying failure criteria. The secondary objectives were to compare the outcomes of IM nailing with and without distal locking. Material and methodsThis was a retrospective, single-center, non-randomized study of 128 patients with a humeral shaft fracture between 2012 and 2020 treated surgically with a long IM nail. Proximal locking was done in every case, then the rotational stability of the nail was tested. Stable nails were not locked distally (group A), while unstable nails were locked distally through an anterior approach (group B). All patients were reviewed with at least 12 months’ follow-up. ResultsDistal locking was performed in 30 patients (mean age 63, 17–91) while the fracture in 98 patients (mean age 65, 20–93) did not require distal locking. The average time to union was 4 months (2–6). The average operative time in group B was 87min (35–185) with 90s fluoroscopy time (33–158) versus 52min (20–127) with 44 s fluoroscopy time (12–143) in group A (p<0.05). Four patients in group B suffered postoperative radial nerve palsy and two others had another fracture at the level of the distal locking screws. The union rate did not differ between groups (Group A 94.6%, group B 86.2%, p=0.217) nor did the functional recovery – SSV of 79.5 (10–100) in group A versus 76 (40–100) in group B (p=0.271) – or the range of motion (p>0.05). There were no instances of rotational malunion. DiscussionExcept for certain distal third fractures, distal locking is not necessary to achieve bone union when the nail is impacted into the medullary canal. This reduces the operative time, fluoroscopy time and risk of neurological damage. Level of evidenceIV.

Comparison of periprosthetic joint infection rates in the direct anterior approach and non-anterior approaches to primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Periprosthetic joint infection is a serious complication and devastating mode of failure of total hip arthroplasty. Various surgical approaches exist for total hip arthroplasty, including the increasingly popularised direct anterior approach. There is no clear consensus on which approach is least associated with periprosthetic joint infection. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the rate of periprosthetic joint infection between surgical approaches to primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. A search of 3 electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library) was conducted for relevant studies up to June 2020 with a defined list of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomised controlled trials and longitudinal studies reporting periprosthetic joint infection rates after primary total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were included based on surgical approach. Data extraction was completed, and a meta-analysis was then performed using OpenMeta[Analyst] software. A total of 24,407 hips were included for meta-analysis with an overall PJI incidence of 0.57%. The incidence rate for periprosthetic joint infection was 0.77% in the direct anterior approach group and 0.44% in the non-anterior approach group. The use of an anterior approach for a total hip arthroplasty was associated with an increased risk for periprosthetic joint infection (odds ratio = 1.404; 95% confidence interval, 0.711-2.771; p = 0.03). The direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty may be associated with a significantly increased risk for periprosthetic joint infection compared to non-anterior approaches, even though the overall rate was still small. This should be considered by orthopedic surgeons when choosing the surgical approach.

The Efficacy of Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion and Posterior Total Laminectomy on Cervical Spinal Cord Injury and Quality of Life.

This study is aimed at investigating the efficacy of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and posterior total laminectomy in the treatment of cervical spinal cord injury and assessing the impact of the two approaches on cervical spine function and patient quality of life. Retrospectively analyze the clinical data from 180 patients with cervical spinal cord injury who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University from June 2019 to June 2021. The patients were divided into an anterior approach group (n = 89, treated with anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion) and a posterior approach group (n = 91, treated with posterior total laminectomy). The amount of blood loss in the posterior approach group was larger compared to the anterior approach group. Patients in the posterior approach group had higher wound diameters and operation times compared to the anterior approach group, as well as the operation cost. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of patients in the posterior approach group were significantly higher than in the anterior approach group one month after operation. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), neck disability index (NDI), and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) scores of patients in both groups at 1, 6, and 9 months after surgery were higher compared to those before surgery, yet no significant differences were observed between the two groups. Also, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of complication and the quality of life between the two groups before and after treatment. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and posterior total laminectomy can effectively restore the cervical nerve function in the treatment of cervical spinal cord injury. However, anterior subtotal vertebral resection is associated with improved perioperative indicators compared to posterior total laminectomy. Clinically, surgical methods can be selected according to imaging findings, the general condition of patients, and individual economic status.

Efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous stylomastoid foramen puncture through the mandibular angle approach and radiofrequency ablation of facial nerve for the treatment of hemifacial spasm

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of CT-guided percutaneous mandibular angle radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) of facial nerve through stylomastoid foramen for the treatment of hemifacial spasm. Methods: A total of 82 patients with primary facial spasm who underwent CT-guided RFT in the Department of Pain Medicine of Zhejiang Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital and Department of Pain Medicine of the First Hospital of Jiaxing from January 2019 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed, including 27 males and 55 females, aged 24-85 (59±11) years. All patients were divided into three groups according to the different puncture approaches: anterior mastoid approach group (Group A, n=35), posterior mastoid approach group (Group P, n=25) and mandibular angle approach group (Group M, n=22). The puncture time, the minimum stimulating current inducing the twitch of facial muscles on the affected side, the temperature at the end of RFT and the duration of RFT at this temperature, the total treatment time, as well as the degree of facial paralysis and complications 1 day after operation were compared among the three groups. Results: The puncture time of the Group A, Group P and Group M was (31.0±4.9) min, (31.9±6.5) min and (35.3±5.9) min, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.020). The puncture time of the Group M was longer than that of the Group A and P (both P<0.05). The minimum stimulation current inducing the twitch of the affected facial muscle in the three groups was (0.5±0.2) mA, (0.4±0.1) mA and (0.3±0.1) mA, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (P=0.000). The minimum stimulation current in the Group M was less than that in the Group A and P (both P<0.05). The temperature at the end of RFT of the three groups was (78.6±8.1) ℃, (76.6±8.3) ℃ and (67.0±8.4) ℃, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001). The temperature of the Group M was lower than that of the Group A and P (both P<0.05). There were no significant differences among the three groups in the duration of RFT at the final temperature, the total treatment time, and the degree of facial paralysis 1 day after operation (all P>0.05). No hematoma, infection, hearing impairment and other complications occurred in all patients. Conclusion: CT-guided percutaneous RFT through stylomastoid foramen is efficacious in the treatment of hemifacial spasm, and the mandibular angle approach provides better performance.

Surgical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Cervical Spine Fractures in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) often results in progressive spinal stiffness, making patients prone to spinal fractures. Cervical spine fractures in AS mostly occur in the lower segment and cause progressive neurological deficits. However, the optimal approach to treating this patient population is still controversial, and it is unclear what factors have an impact on prognosis. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the choice of surgical approach and prognostic factors in AS patients with cervical spine fractures. A total of 22 AS patients with cervical fracture who were treated in our institution were reviewed from 2015 to 2020. We analyzed demographic data, perioperative complications, postoperative results, and radiographic results. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was used to assess preoperative and postoperative spinal cord function, and the improvement rate was calculated. Twenty-two patients were enrolled, including 6 patients in the anterior approach group, 11 in the posterior approach group, and 5 in the combined approach group. The operative time and intraoperative blood loss in the anterior approach group were significantly less than those in the posterior approach group and combined approach group (P= 0.00). Patients who underwent surgery within 48hours of injury had a lower JOA score than patients who underwent surgery later (P= 0.01). Basic AS treatment before injury significantly improved JOA scores after surgery (P=0.01). All approaches can provide good clinical results, and thus, the surgical approach should be individualized. It remains unclear whether the operation should be performed as soon as possible. Basic AS treatment is an independent factor that affects the prognosis of cervical spine fracture patients with AS.

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Anterior Cervical Decompression versus Segmental Fusion and Posterior Expansive Canal Plasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of anterior cervical decompression and segmental fusion and posterior expansive canal plasty in the treatment of multisegment cervical myelopathy. Methods Retrospective analysis was performed of 56 cases of multisegment cervical myelopathy patients admitted from July 2018 to June 2021, 32 male patients and 24 females, aged 56.9 ± 12.8 years with an average duration of 10.6 ± 3.2 years. All patients' preoperative imaging examination revealed multiple-segmented cervical disc herniation and had clinical manifestations of cervical myelopathy. Results No neurovascular complications occurred in both groups, and 24 to 36 months of follow-up (mean 28.6 months) were obtained. The height of the cervical spondylosis segment was higher than that 2 weeks after surgery (p < 0.05), and the curvature of the cervical spine was significantly lower than that before surgery. There was no statistical significance in the height of the anterior column and curvature of the cervical vertebra at 2 weeks after surgery and at the last follow-up (p > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences in anterior curvature of the cervical spine between the two groups at 2 weeks after surgery and the last follow-up (p < 0.05). Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores in both groups recovered significantly after surgery. At 3 months and the last follow-up, the improvement rate of JOA score in the anterior approach group was significantly higher than that in the posterior approach group (p < 0.05), and the improvement rate of JOA score in the anterior approach group was also better than that in the posterior approach group (p < 0.05). Conclusion This segmented anterior fusion procedure can effectively restore the anterior cervical column height and can significantly improve spinal cord function compared with posterior spinal canal enlargement plasty, thus could be considered an effective option for the treatment of multisegment cervical myelopathy.

Driving Simulator Brake Reaction Parameters After Total Hip Arthroplasty According to Different Surgical Approaches

BackgroundThe aim of this study is to validate the point of normalization of braking following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and to determine the relevance of the surgical approach. MethodsBrake reaction parameters (BRPs), including brake reaction time, total brake time, and brake pedal depression force were measured in 90 patients who underwent primary arthroplasty of the right hip (42 with direct anterior approach and 48 with posterolateral approach) using a modern driving simulator. The driving parameters were measured preoperatively and every 2 weeks postoperatively until the eighth week. BRPs were measured in 40 subjects without hip problems, and the results were used as a control. Statistical assessment was performed to analyze when the patients’ reaction to braking recovered to that of the control group with respect to different surgical approaches and also according to the pain. ResultsPreoperative BRPs of the patients undergoing THA were prolonged compared to the control group and were normalized at the sixth week following the operation. Although BRPs of the direct anterior approach group showed significantly better improvement compared to the posterolateral approach group (total brake time at week 2, brake reaction time and brake pedal depression at week 4), both groups reached baseline value at week 6. In addition, we found no correlation between the pain score and BRPs. ConclusionThe results of the current study indicate that the response to braking events normalizes at 6 weeks following THA in young active patients and is irrelevant to the surgical approach.

Is the anterior approach suitable for laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy in patients with large HCC (5-10cm)? A propensity score analysis.

Right hemihepatectomy via the anterior approach was initially employed to improve the survival of patients with large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy via the anterior approach (ALRH) for patients with large HCC remains unclear; thus, we compared short-term and long-term outcomes between ALRH and open right hemihepatectomy via the anterior approach (AORH). 161 patients with HCC who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria in our department were enrolled in this study between January 2015 and August 2018. Perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared using propensity score matching analysis (PSM). There were 45 patients in the ALRH group and 116 patients in the AORH group. After 1:3 PSM, 40 ALRH patients and 95 AORH patients were well matched. The intraoperative time was longer in the ALRH group than in the AORH group after PSM (median, 297.5 vs. 205min, P < 0.001). However, ALRH led to less intraoperative blood loss than AORH after PSM (median, 265 vs. 350ml, P = 0.049). The rates of overall complications (12.5% vs. 30.5%, P = 0.028) in the ALRH group were significantly lower than those in the AORH group after PSM. Moreover, the survival outcomes were equivalent between the two groups with regard to 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (P = 0.698) and disease-free survival rates (P = 0.510). ALRH could be safe and feasible for some patients with large HCCs (5-10cm) when performed by experienced surgeons, and it had superior perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncological outcomes to AORH.

Comparison of early postoperative effects between anterior bladder and posterior bladder approaches in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Objective: To examine the effect of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with different approaches on early postoperative effects. Methods: Totally 44 patients (average age of 65.9 years, range: 46 to 81 years) underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single operator at Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical Collage Hospital from March 2018 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean age was 65.9 years (range: 46 to 81 years), including 24 cases in the anterior bladder approach group (anterior approach group) and 20 cases in the posterior bladder approach group (posterior approach group). The preoperative clinical data, perioperative related data and postoperative urinary control recovery were compared between the two groups by t test, χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Results: In terms of clinical data, there was no difference in age, prostate volume, preoperative prostate specific antigen and Gleason score(all P>0.05). There was no significant difference in operation time ((184±43) minutes vs. (193±42) minutes, t=-0.599, P=0.55), bleeding volume ((218±88) ml vs. (225±115) ml, t=-0.244, P=0.81), postoperative stage (T2/T3: 15/9 vs. 12/8, χ²=0.029, P=0.87) and positive rate of cutting edge (29.2% (7/24) vs. 30.0% (6/20), χ²=0.004, P=0.95). In terms of postoperative urinary control, patient rates who achieved urinary control immediately after extubation was significantly higher for the posterior approach group than the anterior approach group (30.0% (6/20) vs. 4.2% (1/24), P=0.04). There was no significant difference between two groups for those who achieved urinary control 3 months after operation (6 cases vs. 11 cases, P=0.06), 6 months after operation (20 cases vs. 19 cases, P=0.36) and those who achieved urinary control 12 months after operation (23 cases vs. 19 cases, P=1). Conclusion: For robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, the posterior approach does not prolong the operation time, does not increase the amount of bleeding, and improves the short-term postoperative urinary control.

Cumulative experience of the anterior approach in robot-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer patients.

BackgroundRobot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) lobectomy for lung cancer is now performed all around the world. The camera and robotic devices are generally inserted from a low position via the thorax. We previously reported our original anterior approach (AA) for performing RATS lobectomy with a camera and robotic devices inserted via the anterior chest wall. However, whether AA is comparable or superior to the conventional approach (CA) remains unclear.MethodsA total of 108 patients who underwent RATS lobectomy were included in the current study. We compared the AA with the CA for performing RATS lobectomy in terms of the operative and postoperative features, such as total operation/console time, blood loss and postoperative complications.ResultsEighty-seven and 21 patients underwent the AA and CA in RATS lobectomy, respectively. The console and total operation time were significantly shorter in the AA group than in the CA group for RATS lobectomy (median console time: AA vs. CA, 112 vs. 148 min, P=0.0001; median total operation time: AA vs. CA, 193 vs. 243 min, P=0.0002), especially left upper lobectomy. Intraoperative blood loss and the frequency of postoperative complications were significantly reduced in the AA group compared with the CA group (median intraoperative blood loss: AA vs. CA, 20 vs. 105 mL, P<0.0001; postoperative complications: AA vs. CA, 8.0% vs. 28.6%, P=0.0088).ConclusionsThese results suggest that our AA of RATS lobectomy can be very easily and safely performed.

P28. Postoperative complications of opioid alternatives in common lumbar spine procedures

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Lumbar fusions are commonly used surgical techniques for the treatment of instability and degenerative disc disease. Few studies have examined if the non-opioid analgesics Gabapentin and Pregabalin can effectively manage postoperative pain following common lumbar fusion procedures. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> This study aims to examine postoperative complications associated with the use of non-opioid analgesics (ie, Gabapentin or Pregabalin) for postoperative pain management following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective database review. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Patient cohort identified using MSpine national database that includes patients of all payer types who received fusion procedures. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Complications examined included the following: neurologic, GI, respiratory, DVT and pulmonary embolism, pruritus, mental disorders, urinary incontinence and postoperative pain. <h3>METHODS</h3> The MSpine national database was queried with relevant Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for patients who underwent an ALIF, PLIF, or TLIF between 2010 to 2019. Patients were organized into anterior approach and posterior approach groups and further queried using National Drug Codes (NDC) to form cohorts of patients who received (i) exclusively opioids, or (ii) a mix regimen, for postoperative pain management. A search of relevant International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes identified the postoperative surgical and medical complications. Propensity score matching for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index was performed to control for potential confounding factors. Odds ratios and CI will be used to compare postoperative complication rates between the various groups. <h3>RESULTS</h3> The anterior_opioids group included 22,581 patients (45.5% male and 54.5% female) and the anterior_mix group included 2,192 patients (37.2% male and 62.8% female). The posterior_opioids group included 22,279 patients (48.0% male and 52.0% female) and the posterior_mix group included 2,677 patients (39.4% male and 60.6% female). After propensity score matching, the anterior groups and posterior groups were 2,182 and 2,671 patients, respectively. The incidence of postoperative pain at 6 weeks was higher in anteriormix (6.0%) than anterior_opioids (3.9%); similarly, this incidence was higher in posterior_mix (8.6%) than posterior_opioids (5.6%). The incidence of mental disorders at 3 weeks was higher in anterior_opioids (6.9%) than anterior_mix (5.8%), while the incidence of GI complications at 3 weeks was lower in anterior_opioids (3.1%) than anterior_mix (3.8%). Respiratory complications at 3 weeks were higher in posterior_mix (2.5%) than posterior_opioids (1.9%). Furthermore, neurologic complications at 3 weeks were higher in posterior_mix (2.3%) than posterior_opioids (1.9%). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Patients receiving opioids and Gabapentin or Pregabalin for postoperative pain management following ALIF had higher incidence of postoperative pain and GI complications, but lower incidence of mental disorders, compared to patients who received opioids. Patients who received a mixed regimen for postoperative pain management following PLIF or TLIF were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative pain, respiratory, and neurologic complications. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

116. Comparison of long-term clinical and radiographical outcomes between the anterior and combined anterior and posterior approaches for treating lumbosacral tuberculosis

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Both the anterior and combined anterior and posterior approaches have been used to treat lumbosacral tuberculosis. However, long-term follow-up studies of each approach have not been conducted. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> We aimed to compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes between the two approaches. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective comparative study. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Fifty-nine patients with lumbosacral tuberculosis who underwent surgical treatment. Twenty-four patients underwent the anterior approach (group A) and 25 underwent the combined anterior and posterior approach (group AP). <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> We collected clinical data, such as visual analog scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores and neurological status, and radiographical data, such as lumbosacral angle and physiological lordosis. Furthermore, operative time, length of stay, and intraoperative and postoperative blood loss (IBL, PBL) were recorded. <h3>Methods</h3> We included 59 patients with a minimum 6-year follow-up between January 2008 to March 2012. Twenty-four patients underwent the anterior approach (group A) and 25 underwent the combined anterior and posterior approach (group AP). We collected clinical data, such as visual analog scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores and neurological status, and radiographical data, such as lumbosacral angle and physiological lordosis. Furthermore, operative time, length of stay, and intraoperative and postoperative blood loss (IBL, PBL) were recorded. <h3>Results</h3> Both groups had satisfactory clinical and radiographical outcomes until follow-up. All patients achieved bony fusion, and no group differences were found in any of the clinical indices. Both groups corrected and maintained lumbosacral angle and physiological lordosis. However, operative time, length of stay, maximum Hb drop, IBL, and PBL of group A (140.63 ± 24.73 min, 12.58 ± 2.45 d, 28.33 ± 9.70 g/L, 257.08 ± 110.47 mL, and 430.60 ± 158.27 mL, respectively) was significantly lower than those of group AP (423.60 ± 82.81 min, p < 0.001; 21.32 ± 3.40 d, p < 0.001; 38.48 ± 8.03 g/L, p < 0.001; 571.60 ± 111.04 mL, p < 0.001; and 907.01 ± 231.99 mL, p < 0.001). <h3>Conclusions</h3> This retrospective study demonstrated long-term efficacy of the anterior approach, which was as effective as that of the combined anterior and posterior approach, with the advantage of less trauma. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

A comparative of a single novice surgeon's direct anterior approach and posterior approach learning curves in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.

The purpose of the present study was to compare a novice surgeon's learning curves with the direct anterior approach and posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. A consecutive series of 376 total hip arthroplasties performed from November 2014 to September 2019 in a level-one healthcare center by a single surgeon (V.B) were retrospectively studied. Demographic data, functional outcomes, and complications were collected and compared. Within the ranks of the patients studied, we found differences between groups with respect to dislocation rate and length of stay; these were lower in the direct anterior approach (DAA) group. The approach was not associated with an increase in complications, but rather with a decrease in the rate of dislocations and better functional outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Operative time was initially higher with this approach, but equalized during the learning curve. The DAA can be safe even in the early stages of a novice surgeon's learning curve. It does not present a higher complication rate than the posterior approach, either in infection rate or in periprosthetic fractures. However, the DAA may provide greater functionality, lower dislocation rate and a shorter hospital stay. It can also be concluded that after having performed a certain number of interventions, operative time for the DAA can be comparable to that of other approaches.

Comparison between single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement interbody fusion and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis

PurposeTo compare the efficacy of single anterior and single posterior approach of debridement, interbody fusion, and fixation for the treatment of mono-segment lumbar spine tuberculosis (TB) patients.MethodsEighty-seven patients with mono-segment lumbar TB who underwent debridement, interbody fusion, and fixation through either single anterior (Group A) or single posterior approach (Group B) from January 2007 to January 2017 were enrolled in this study. The duration of the operation, blood loss, complication rate, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Frankel scale, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), kyphosis angle, correction rate, correction loss, and time taken for bone graft fusion were compared between the groups.ResultsThe average period of follow-up was 34.3 ± 9.5 months (24–56 months). No significant differences were observed between patients in Group A and patients in Group B in terms of gender, age, body mass index (BMI), duration of illness and preoperative evaluative indices (P > 0.05). The mean operation time and blood loss was significantly higher in Group A (P = 0.000), along with a slightly higher rate of complications compared with Group B (P = 0.848). The VAS, ODI and Frankel scale scores showed significant improvement in both groups (P = 0.000), along with the ESR, CRP and kyphosis indices (P = 0.000), which were similar in both groups at the final follow-up.ConclusionBoth single anterior and single posterior approaches of debridement, interbody fusion and fixation are effective for mono-segment lumbar TB patients, although the single posterior approach is of a shorter duration and results in less blood loss.

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided above-knee lateral approach for popliteal sciatic nerve block in surgeries below the knee: a randomized controlled trial.

Ultrasound guidance has become a standard method for detection of nerve structures in regional anesthesia. During ultrasound-guided blockade, to identify anatomical structures is crucial but can be challenging. In clinical practice, we find a wide difference in the visibility score of the sciatic nerve (SN) through different approaches. This study aimed to compare SNB through the anterior and above-knee lateral approach in terms of identification ease, performance efficacy, and safety. Patients scheduled for below-knee surgery were randomized to either receive SNB using the above-knee lateral approach (Group L, n=27) or the anterior approach (Group A, n=26). The primary outcome was the visibility score of SN. Secondary outcomes included the time taken to identify the SN, nerve depth, success rate of SN identification, number of needle passes, time to elicit foot flexion, needle depth, and occurrence of SNB complications. Additionally, the sensory block onset and analgesia duration were assessed. We included 53 adult patients. Compared with Group A, Group L showed a higher SN visibility score [3.25 (3.17, 3.67) vs. 2.50 (1.86, 2.68), P<0.001]. The scan time was significantly shorter in Group L [8.70 (6.01) s vs. 31.54 (11.87) s, P<0.001]. The depth of the SN was 3.20 (0.56) cm in Group L and 5.53 (0.84) cm in Group A (P<0.001), and the needle insertion depth was 7.15 (0.90) cm in group L and 8.32 (1.13) cm in Group A (P<0.001). The number of needle passes was less in Group L, as well as the time to elicit foot flexion, and the time taken to perform the SN block (all P<0.001). The success rate of SN identification was non-significantly higher in Group L. There was no significant between-group difference in the onset of sensory block, as well as postoperative analgesia duration. None of the approaches involved acute systemic toxicity and hematoma occurrence. Based on the visibility score, the above-knee lateral approach allowed easy SN identification and safe SNB. Using the ultrasound-guided above-knee lateral approach for SNB in below-knee surgeries could be a reliable choice.

Anterior versus Posterior Approach for Ultrasound (US) Guided Shoulder Magnetic Resonance (MR) Arthrograms

Background: Shoulder arthrography is an accurate method that can help in diagnosing several diseases. When shoulder arthrography is done combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a more comprehensive assessment of the cartilaginous structures of the glenohumeral joint is performed. Objective: This study aims to compare the anterior with the posterior ultrasound-guided arthrography injection approaches in achieving optimal needle placement, ensuring the accuracy of shoulder arthrography injections. Subjects and Methods: A total of 38 individuals (suffering from shoulder dislocation) were enrolled, in the study. The efficacy of the technique was evaluated relative to the success or failure of contrast medium administration into the glenohumeral joint, and the number of attempts required to achieve that success. Results: The success rate among the anterior approach group was 84.2% versus 89.5% in the posterior approach group. The mean number of trials for the anterior and posterior approaches showed no statistically significant difference while the mean injected volume with the anterior approach was significantly lower than that of the posterior approach group (P-Value: 0.006). Conclusion: The posterior approach has a slight advantage over the anterior approach regarding the injected volume of the contrast medium. However, there were better results yet non-statistically significant regarding the anterior and posterior approaches accuracy, pain tolerance, and the number of trials.

Prevalence and Clinical Outcome of Sympathetic Chain Injury after Anterior Approach to Upper Lumbar Fractures

Background data: The sympathetic chain is a vulnerable structure in anterior reconstructive surgeries to upper lumbar fractures. Purpose: To explore the prevalence of sympathetic chain injuries following the anterior surgical approach to treat upper lumbar fractures and their impact on clinical outcomes. Study design: A nonrandomized prospective cohort study. Patients and Methods: Consecutive cases with upper lumbar fractures that undergone surgery by either anterior or posterior approaches were preoperatively and postoperatively evaluated for sympathetic chain injury and followed up six months after surgery to explore outcomes. Two simple, valid, and reliable bedside tests were used to assess sympathetic functions: the skin wrinkling test (SWT) and the skin temperature difference (STD). Outcomes were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) at six months in both positive and negative groups with sympathetic injury. Results: The 2 approach groups (32 cases each) showed comparable demographic and clinical criteria. The SWT showed high interrater reliability with agreement in 92% of cases. The positive group with confirmed sympathetic injury included 29 cases, all of which belonged to the anterior approach group. The negative group with equivocal or confirmed intact sympathetic function included 35 cases; 3 of them belonged to the anterior group. The ODI and SF-12 scores were found to be comparable between positive and negative groups 6 months after surgery. Conclusion: Sympathetic chain injury is a frequent complication (90.6% of cases) following the anterior approach to upper lumbar fractures. The cases are unilateral, relatively silent, and related to the side of approach with no clinical impact on quality of life on 6-month outcome assessment. (2020ESJ201)