“If it is not true it is very well invented” (Giordano Bruno 1548–1600)Forensic pathology by its very nature is a science that dealswith specimens that are no longer living, whether these areentire bodies of deceased indivi duals, or are isolated organsor tissues that have been submitted for evaluation. Thereare certain advantages to this, with dissections not beingencumbered by complex machinery and paraphernaliarequired to maintain life. However, there are also distinctdisadvantages with opinions having to be formulated basedon the examination of tissues that have been devitalized forconsiderable periods of time.The fact that organs and tissues are no longer being per-fused by oxygenated blood means that metabolic processeshave stopped and autolytic and putrefactive changes areoccurring. Decomposition begins from the moment of cel-lular death and this causes a spectrum of tissue alterations.In extreme cases there may be minimal soft tissues left toassist with the assessment of underlying organic diseases orinjuries. Given these problems however, the results of arecent study published in the journal demonstrated that theautopsy was still a “useful diagnostic exercise,” with sig-niWcant anatomical and pathological features being demon-strated in most decomposed bodies to enable both the causeand manner of death to be established [1].An associated problem is animal predation. Domesticanimals such as dogs and cats may consume signi Wcant por-tions of bodies, including organs responsible for death, inaddition to creating tissue defects that may be diYcult todistinguish from antemortem injuries. Insects may modifypre-existing injuries such as stab and bullet wounds. Theresults of such activities have to be deWned as carefully aspossible and then subtracted from the autopsy Wndings in anattempt to estimate what was truly present in the perimor-tem period. This may not, however, always be possible.While it is recognized that surgeons often perform com-plex dissections and reconstructions in the living, postmor-tem dissections may also be diYcult. The absence ofcirculation means that the vasculature is Xattened and non-pulsatile and so vessels may not be easily identiWed. Simi-larly, tissue planes and organ pathology may be obscuredby postmortem changes. Even if abnormal areas can beidentiWed, the signiWcance of subsequently demonstratedmicroscopic changes may be uncertain as tissues andorgans tend to have only a limited range of responses to avariety of pathological insults. For example an acuteinXammatory inWltrate may result from ischemia, infection,or blunt trauma, and scarring may follow burns, lacerations,or incisions. Organs may also be altered in a non-speciWcmanner by the pathophysiological changes that accompanydying, with for example disseminated intravascular coagu-lation and coagulopathy from multiorgan failure causingmarked changes in tissue morphology not due to the under-lying condition per se, but to the body’s response to it. If nomacroscopic abnormalities have been identiWed, histologycan be used to screen for occult disease; however, samplingerror may become an issue as a 5- section of tissue maynot be fully representative of a 500-g organ as a whole. Dis-eases with a patchy distribution such as myocarditis exem-plify this problem. It should also be noted that tissueresponses to subtle metabolic and electrophysiologic abnor-malities may not be detectable by standard techniques, andso it may not always be possible to demonstrate a deWnitive
Read full abstract