Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion Time Research Articles

Safety of prolonged bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion in aortic arch surgery with moderate hypothermia.

This study investigates the impact of bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion time on outcomes in aortic arch surgery. In total, 961 patients underwent either hemi arch (n = 385) or total arch replacement (n = 576) with bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion and moderate hypothermia management between 2006 and 2020 across 2 aortic centers. Antegrade cerebral perfusion time was categorized into 4 groups (≤30 min: n = 169, 30-60min: n = 298, 60-90min: n = 261, >90min: n = 233). Inverse probability treatment weighting yielded a well-balanced cohort among the 4 groups except for the cannulation site. Adjusted cubic spline and multivariable logistic analysis were performed, controlling for surgical procedure, cannulation site and cardiopulmonary bypass time, to identify the relationship between antegrade cerebral perfusion time and major in-hospital complications including mortality, stroke, acute renal failure, and prolonged ventilation. There remained a significant difference in surgical procedures and cardiopulmonary bypass time in the matched cohort. The incidences of mortality and stroke did not show significant trend (P = 0.052 and P = 0.717 respectively). Cubic spline curves showed that odds ratios did not increase linearly for any complications with increasing antegrade cerebral perfusion time. Furthermore, antegrade cerebral perfusion time, even exceeding 90 min, was not associated with complication rates (mortality: odds ratio = 1.459 [0.368-6.049], p = 0.595; stroke: 0.310 [0.058-1.635], p = 0.166; renal failure: 1.744 [0.521-6.094], p = 0.374; prolonged ventilation: 1.502 [0.535-4.286], p = 0.442), whereas cardiopulmonary bypass time was associated with mortality and prolonged ventilation. Even when antegrade cerebral perfusion time exceeded 90 min, it was not associated with major in-hospital complications, questioning its validity as a marker for surgical insult.

Contemporary Single-Center Experience of Complete Aortic Arch Replacement Employing the Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique in Patients with Extensive Aortic Disease.

Objective: This study aimed to examine contemporary results of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure in an all-comers patient cohort. Methods: Between January 2017 and May 2024, a total of 132 consecutive patients with either aortic aneurysm (n = 32), acute aortic dissection (n = 32), or chronic aortic dissection (n = 68) underwent total aortic arch replacement employing the FET technique. In-hospital data were collected prospectively and included preoperative characteristics, intraoperative data, and follow-up results. Results: The median cardiopulmonary bypass time, cardiac ischemia time, and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time were 180 (161-205), 89 (70-113), and 45 (38-54) min, respectively. Total 30-day mortality rate was 7.6% (n = 10). The rate of major postoperative neurological complications was 6.8% (n = 9) for perioperative stroke and 2.3% (n = 3) for permanent spinal cord injury. Five patients (3.8%) required hemofiltration at the time of discharge due to postoperative kidney injury. Rates of subsequent endovascular and open aortic repair following primary FET were 40.9% (n = 54) and 3.8% (n = 5), respectively. The median time to reintervention was 86 (30-439) days. The median follow-up time was 25 (8-52) months, and overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 89%, 89%, and 87%, respectively. Conclusions: Our data are consistent with current reports, indicating that the FET technique is a valuable adjunct in treating extensive aortic arch pathologies. The procedure provides an increasingly safe and effective option for complete aortic arch replacement, even in patients requiring a redo procedure.

Aortic arch repair with extended end-to-side anastomosis in neonates and infants with transverse arch hypoplasia

Background/Aim: The use of patches to repair the aortic arch is believed to have a positive effect on long-term morbidity. In this study, perioperative and follow-up data of patients who underwent transverse arch repair with a patch were compared with the data of patients who underwent end-to-end anastomosis (ESA). Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, the data of 27 patients (including 18 newborns) who underwent aortic arch repair at the Gazi Yasargil Education and Research Hospital between January 2018 and April 2023 were analyzed. The inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of proximal and distal transverse aortic arch hypoplasia, an age younger than 12 months of age, and the completion of aortic arch repair using cardiopulmonary bypass. Patients who underwent recoarctation repair due to residual obstruction, patients with single ventricular physiology, and patients who underwent aortic arch repair via a lateral thoracotomy without undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass were excluded from the study. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included individuals who underwent aortic anterior wall expansion with autologous pericardium in addition to ESA; Group 2 included patients who underwent ESA only. Results: The median age of the patients was 21 days (range: 6–365 days), and the median body weight of the cohort was 3.5 kilograms (range: 2.4–8.9 kilograms). Enlargement with autologous pericardial patch was applied to 11 patients (40.7%). Surgical procedures performed in addition to arch repair included eight ventricular septal defect closures, six instances of pulmonary banding, three atrial septal defect closures, and one subvalvular pulmonary stenosis repair. The in-hospital mortality rate was 11.1% (n=3). Those three patients died due to sepsis. The median follow-up period was 152 days (range: 10–1316 days). Recoarctation requiring re-intervention did not occur in any of the studied patients. The antegrade selective cerebral perfusion time was statistically significantly longer in patients who underwent aortic arch repair using a patch (P=0.03). Conclusion: Repair of the arch with a patch may contribute to a reduction in long-term mortality and morbidity. However, there is a need for more comprehensive and long-term follow-up studies to verify these findings.

Branch-first aortic arch replacement strategy decreases perioperative mortality

ObjectiveSparce evidence suggests superiority of total arch replacement with the branch-first technique and antegrade cerebral perfusion over conventional techniques with respect to morbidity and mortality. Thus, we aimed to compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing traditional total arch replacement versus branch-first total arch replacement. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 144 patients undergoing total arch replacement from January 2017 to December 2021. Patients were dichotomized based on technique, either traditional total arch replacement or branch-first total arch replacement. Primary end points were 30-day mortality and adverse events. Branch-first total arch replacement and traditional total arch replacement cohorts were compared using Student t tests and chi-square tests. Univariable and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify risk factors associated with 30-day mortality. ResultsA total of 68 patients (47.2%) underwent traditional total arch replacement, and 76 patients (52.8%) underwent branch-first total arch replacement. The branch-first total arch replacement cohort had higher rates of chronic kidney disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and previous myocardial infarction (P = .04, .002, .035, and .031 respectively). The majority of total arch replacements (78, 55%) were performed for aneurysmal disease. Median antegrade cerebral perfusion times were significantly shorter in the branch-first total arch replacement cohort (P = .001). There were no significant differences in rates of stroke, reintubation, postoperative lumbar drainage, renal failure, reoperation for bleeding, or prolonged ventilation between total arch replacement cohorts. The branch-first total arch replacement group had significantly lower 30-day mortality compared with the traditional total arch replacement group (4% vs 19%, P = .004). After adjustment for chronic kidney disease, nonelective status, antegrade cerebral perfusion time, rates of dissections arriving in extremis or with malperfusion, and primary surgeon, undergoing a branch-first total arch replacement was associated with a 93% reduced odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio, 0.07, 95% CI, 0.009-0.48, P = .007). ConclusionsWe provide evidence that branch-first total arch replacement significantly reduces 30-day mortality compared with traditional total arch replacement.

Association between Bilateral Selective Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion and Postoperative Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Emergency Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection-Single Centre Experience.

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a surgical emergency with a mortality of 1-2% per hour. Since its discovery over 200 years ago, surgical techniques for repairing a dissected aorta have evolved, and with the introduction of hypothermic circulatory arrest and cerebral perfusion, complex techniques for replacing the entire aortic arch were possible. However, postoperative neurological complications contribute significantly to mortality in this group of patients. The aim of this study was to determine the association between different bilateral selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) times and the incidence of postoperative ischemic stroke in patients with emergency surgery for ATAAD. Patients with documented hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, clinical signs of stroke or neurological dysfunction prior to surgery, that died on the operating table or within 48 h after surgery, from whom the postoperative neurological status could not be assessed, and with incomplete medical records were excluded from this study. The diagnosis of postoperative stroke was made using head computed tomography imaging (CT) when clinical suspicion was raised by a neurologist in the immediate postoperative period. For selective bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion, we used two balloon-tipped cannulas inserted under direct vision into the innominate artery and the left common carotid artery. Each cannula is connected to a separate pump with an independent pressure line. Near-infrared spectroscopy was used in all cases for cerebral oxygenation monitoring. The circulatory arrest was initiated after reaching a target core temperature of 25-28 °C. In total, 129 patients were included in this study. The incidence of postoperative ischemic stroke documented on a head CT was 24.8% (31 patients), and postoperative death was 20.9% (27 patients). The most common surgical technique performed was supravalvular ascending aorta and Hemiarch replacement with a Dacron graft in 69.8% (90 patients). The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 210 +/- 56.874 min, the mean aortic cross-clamp time was 114.775 +/- 34.602 min, and the mean cerebral perfusion time was 37.837 +/- 18.243 min. Using logistic regression, selective ACP of more than 40 min was independently associated with postoperative ischemic stroke (OR = 3.589; 95%CI = 1.418-9.085; p = 0.007). Considering the high incidence of postoperative stroke in our study population, we concluded that bilateral selective ACP should be used with caution, especially in patients with severely calcified ascending aorta and/or aortic arch and supra-aortic vessels. All efforts should be made to minimize the duration of circulatory arrest when using bilateral selective ACP with a target of less than 30 min, in hypothermia, at a body temperature of 25-28 °C.

Initial Asian experience of the branched E-vita open NEO in complex aortic pathologies.

Aortic arch pathology often requires staged segmental repairs. Total aortic arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (FET) offers surgical options for these pathologies. The Jotec E-vita Open NEO™ branched prosthesis was introduced in 2020; we sought to share our initial experience focusing on the prosthesis selection strategies, surgical techniques, anastomosis-bleeding and graft-oozing control methods, and early clinical outcomes from two Asian centers. We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients with aortic arch pathologies who underwent total arch replacement using the FET procedure with Jotec E-vita Open NEO™ branched prosthesis from two Asian centers between October 2020 and August 2021. The primary outcome was overall 30-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were operative complications. Twenty-five consecutive patients underwent total arch replacement with FET with the novel hybrid prosthesis. Overall 30-day mortality from both centers was 0%. Overall mean operative, cardiopulmonary bypass, hypothermic circulatory arrest, and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion times were 353.4±80.5, 183.2±39.6, 57.2±14.7, and 138.2±28.6 minutes, respectively. No patient developed stroke. Permanent spinal cord injury (SCI) was recorded in one patient (4%) and one (4%) had transient lower limb weakness that resolved after spinal drainage. There was no requirement of re-sternotomy for hemostasis. We reported a multicenter Asian case series with the novel FET hybrid prosthesis demonstrating the feasibility and safety of promising initial clinical outcomes. The technique of circumferential reinforcement of vascular anastomosis for hemostasis may be one of the methods for lowering the rates of re-sternotomy for hemostasis, and proper surgical or transfusion strategies would overcome the excessive oozing of the prosthesis. Long-term follow-up is required for further evaluation of aortic pathology progression and device-related outcomes.

Innominate Artery Cannulation for Proximal Aortic Surgery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of innominate artery cannulation strategy with side-graft technique in proximal aortic pathologies. A total of 70 patients underwent innominate artery cannulation with a side graft for surgery on the proximal aorta from 2012 to 2020. There were 46 men and 24 women with an average age of 56±13 years. The indications for surgery were type A aortic dissection in 17 patients (24.3%), aortic aneurysm in 52 patients (74.3%), and ascending aorta pseudoaneurysm in one patient (1.4%). The innominate artery was free of disease in all patients. Hypothermic circulatory arrest with antegrade cerebral perfusion was utilized in 60 patients (85.7%). Three patients had previous sternotomy (4.2%). The most common surgical procedure was ascending aorta with hemiarch replacement in 34 patients (48.5%). The mean cardiac ischemia and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 116+46 minutes and 164+56 minutes, respectively. Mean antegrade cerebral perfusion time was 27+14 minutes. The patients were cooled between 22°C and 30°C during surgery. Thirty-day mortality rate was 7.1% (five patients). One patient (1.4%) had stroke, one patient (1.4%) had temporary neurologic deficit, and eight patients (11.4%) had confusion and agitation that resolved completely in all cases. There was no local complication or arterial injury. Cannulation of the innominate artery with side graft is safe and effective for both cardiopulmonary bypass and antegrade cerebral perfusion. This technique provides satisfactory neurologic outcomes for proximal aortic surgery.

Normothermic Versus Hypothermic Norwood Procedure.

Either deep hypothermia with circulatory arrest or hypothermic perfusion with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion is used during the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Normothermic perfusion has been described for pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to compare the early outcomes of patients undergoing the Norwood procedure with antegrade selective cerebral perfusion under hypothermia with the procedure under normothermia. From 2005 to 2020, 117 consecutive patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome underwent the Norwood procedure: 68 (58.2%) under hypothermia and 49 (41.8%) under normothermia. Antegrade selective cerebral perfusion flow was adjusted to maintain right radial arterial pressure above 50 mm Hg, and a flow rate of 40 to 50 mL kg-1 min-1. Baseline characteristics, operative data, and postoperative outcomes including lactate recovery time were compared. The baseline characteristics and cardiovascular diagnosis were similar in both groups. The normothermic group had a significantly shorter bypass time (in minutes) of 90.31 (±31.60) versus 123.63 (±25.33), a cross-clamp time of 45.24 (±16.35) versus 81.93 (±16.34), and an antegrade selective cerebral perfusion time of 25.61 (±13.84) versus 47.30 (±14.35) (P < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in the immediate postoperative course, or in terms of in-hospital mortality, which totaled 9 (18.4%) in the normothermic group, and 10 (14.9%) in the hypothermic group (P = .81). The normothermic Norwood procedure with selective cerebral perfusion is feasible and safe in terms of in-hospital mortality and short-term outcomes. It is comparable to the standard hypothermic Norwood with selective cerebral perfusion.

Safety Time and Optimal Temperature of Unilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Single-Center 15-Year Experience.

The optimal level of hypothermia and safe time of unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (uACP) in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair remain controversial. To analyze the association of uACP time and circulatory arrest temperature with surgical outcomes of ATAAD. We retrospectively analyzed 263 patients who had undergone ATAAD repair between 2006 and 2020 using uACP. The patients were stratified by three chronologically equivalent periods (period 1, 2006 to 2010; period 2, 2011 to 2015; period 3, 2016 to 2020) to demonstrate the decade-long evolution of surgical strategy and outcomes. The mean age of the patients was 59.4 ± 12.5 years, and 68.8% were male. The hospital mortality rates were 15.1%, 12.9%, and 11.0% from period 1 to 3 (p = 0.740). The median circulatory arrest temperatures were 20, 23, and 25 °C (p < 0.001), respectively, and the median uACP times were 72, 59, and 41 minutes (p < 0.001). The incidence rates of postoperative permanent neurologic deficits were 13.2%, 10.9%, and 18.3% (p = 0.312), and those of transient neurologic deficits were 9.4%, 10.9%, and 11.9% (p = 0.936), respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that uACP time ≥ 60 minutes was an independent predictor of hospital mortality rather than postoperative stroke. ROC curve analysis estimated an optimal cutoff value of 52 minutes of uACP time when the circulatory arrest temperature was ≥ 25 °C to predict hospital mortality (area under the curve: 0.72). Unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion time was associated with hospital mortality after ATAAD surgery. A safe threshold of 50 to 60 minutes of uACP should be considered.

Recannulation of the right axillary artery in reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery is safe.

OBJECTIVESTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of recannulating the axillary artery in reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery.METHODSBetween 2008 and 2020, we evaluated patients who underwent reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery. The patients were divided into 2 groups: (i) patients with no previous right axillary artery cannulation (primary cannulation group) and (ii) patients with a previous cannulated right axillary artery (recannulation group). We analysed the intraoperative data, cannulation-related complications, postoperative outcomes and compared the 2 groups (primary cannulation versus recannulation).RESULTSThe patient (n = 132) baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There was no statistically significant difference in regard to the duration of surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp and antegrade cerebral perfusion time nor in regard to the total number of patients with cannulation-related complications between the 2 groups [n = 8 (8.0%) vs n = 1 (3.1%), P = 0.34]. The incidence of iatrogenic axillary artery dissection, iatrogenic aortic dissection, iatrogenic aortic dissection leading to death, axillary artery thrombosis, need for surgical repair, brachial plexus injury rates, malperfusion, high perfusion resistance and hyperperfusion syndrome revealed no significant difference between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). There were 11 (11.0%) cases of stroke in the primary cannulation group and 1 (3.1%) in the recannulation group (P = 0.18).CONCLUSIONSRecannulation of the right axillary artery in reoperative proximal thoracic aortic surgery is not associated with worse clinical outcomes and can be safely and effectively performed, also representing a preventive and rescue measure. Previous cannulation of the axillary artery should not hinder the decision for recannulation.

Total aortic arch replacement using the thoraflex hybrid prosthesis: early- and medium-term results from a Scandinavian center

Objective. The purpose of this study was to assess our early experience with the Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis. Design. This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study. Results. Between December 2014 and December 2019, 34 patients underwent total aortic arch replacement with the Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis. Fifteen of the patients had pre-operative chronic aortic dissection. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 200 ± 35 min, aortic cross clamp time 114 ± 34 min, deep circulatory arrest time to the lower body 60 ± 22 min, and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time 67 ± 24 min. The rate of stroke was 11.7% (4/34), paraparesis was 8.8% (3/34) and renal failure was 11.7% (4/34). No patient required permanent dialysis. Three (8.8%) patients died within the first 30 days postoperatively. All early deaths were due to stroke or spinal cord complications. During follow-up, an additional four patients died. Average follow-up was 32.4 ± 19.4 months (1102 patient-months) and was 100% complete. Survival at 12 months and 36 months was 88% ± 7.2% and 75% ± 12.7%, respectively. Conclusions. The Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis can be used in the setting of total aortic arch replacement with good early- and medium-term results. Stroke and spinal cord complications remain an important source of early mortality.

Combined femoral and axillary perfusion strategy for Stanford type a aortic dissection repair

BackgroundThe optimal cannulation strategy in surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection is critical to patient survival but remains controversial. Different cannulation strategies have their own advantages and drawbacks during cardiopulmonary bypass. Our centre used a combined femoral and axillary perfusion strategy for the surgical treatment of type A aortic dissection. The purpose of this study was to review and clarify the clinical outcome of femoral artery cannulation combined with axillary artery cannulation for the treatment of Stanford type A aortic dissection.MethodsWe performed a retrospective study that included 327 patients who were surgically treated for type A aortic dissection in our institution from January 2017 to June 2019. Femoral and axillary artery cannulation was used to establish cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with type A aortic dissection. The demographic data, surgical data, and clinical results of the patients were calculated.ResultsFemoral artery combined with axillary artery cannulation was technically successful in 327 patients. The cardiopulmonary bypass time was 141.60 ± 34.89 min, and the selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time was 14.94 ± 2.76 min. The early mortality rate was 3.06%. The incidence of permanent neurologic dysfunction was 0.92%. Sixteen patients had postoperative renal insufficiency, and five patients had liver failure.ConclusionFemoral artery combined with axillary artery cannulation for type A aortic dissection can significantly improve the prognosis of patients, especially in terms of cerebral protection, and can reduce the occurrence of adverse malperfusion syndrome and neurological complications.

Total Aortic Arch Replacement and Frozen Elephant Trunk

Aortic arch pathologies have been a surgical challenge, involving cerebral, visceral and myocardial protection. Innovative techniques including total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk had evolved over last decades with promising mid-term outcomes. We evaluate our mid-term outcomes on total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk and the role of timely second staged interventions. Between August 2014 and April 2020, 41 patients with aortic arch pathologies underwent total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk with Thoraflex-Hybrid-Plexus device (Vascutek, Inchinnan, Scotland). Patients' perioperative, clinical and radiological outcomes were reviewed. Post discharge survival (n = 37) at 3 year was 100%. Overall survival of 85.3% over a median follow up of 3.3 years, inpatient mortality of 9.8%. Distribution of aortic pathologies with acute type A dissection or intramural hematoma (n = 15, 36.6%), thoracic aortic aneurysm, including arch and descending aortic aneurysm (n = 9, 22%) and chronic aortic dissection including chronic type A and type B dissections (n = 13, 31.7%). Mean operative, circulatory arrest, and antegrade cerebral perfusion time were 417 ± 121 minutes, 89 ± 28 minutes, and 154 ± 43 minutes, respectively. Second stage procedures were performed in 32% and distal stent graft induced new entry was observed in 19% of patients. We reported an Asian series of Thoraflex with outstanding midterm clinical outcomes, given descending aortic pathologies were tackled with a timely second stage interventions. The observation of aortic remodeling and distal stent graft induced new entry requires further investigations.

C-Reactive Protein and Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio Values in Predicting Inhospital Death in Patients with Stanford Type A Acute Aortic Dissection.

Aortic dissection is a cardiovascular disease with high mortality and morbidity rates. The aim of this study is to investigate the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing emergent surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissection. Patients operated for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection between January 2010 and December 2018 were included in the study. Patients without in-hospital mortality were classified as Group 1, and patients with mortality were classified as Group 2. One-hundred-eighteen patients were involved in the study. Patient mean age was 57 ± 11.7 years, and 89 patients (75.4%) were male. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil counts, and C-reactive protein (CRP) values at the time of admission also were found to be high in Group 2 (P = .001, .021, < .001, < .001 respectively). Total perfusion times (TPt), antegrade cerebral perfusion time (ACPt), cross-clamp time (CCt), and intensive care unit (ICU) stay periods significantly were higher in the mortality group (P < .001, < .001, = .01, and < .001, respectively). In receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, a cut-off level of 23 mg/L was determined for CRP levels that predict progression to mortality (area under the curve (AUC): 0.879, P < .001, 75.0% sensitivity and 58.0% specificity). Similarly, a cut-off level of 8.8 was found for NLR that predicts progression to mortality (AUC: 0.835, P < .001, 76.0% sensitivity and 61.0% specificity). As a result, we can use CRP and NLR values, which easily can be measured or calculated from blood tests to predict mortality in patients with aortic dissections, which may have serious mortal consequences.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Delirium in Type A Aortic Dissection Patients: A Retrospective Study.

BackgroundPostoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication in cardiac surgery among adult patients. This retrospective study was designed to identify the risk factors associated with POD of type A aortic dissection patients.Material/MethodsClinical data of 148 patients with type A aortic dissection in the Department of Critical Care Medicine was retrospectively analyzed. All these patients underwent Sun’s procedure with anesthetic treatment. The confusion assessment method for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) was adapted to evaluate the delirium status of these patients. They were divided into 2 groups: the delirium group and the control group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed in succession to determine the independent risk factors for POD.ResultsThe average age of these patients was 54.41±11.676 years old. Among the 148 patients, POD was detected in 68 patients, with an incidence of 45.95%. According to univariate analysis, age, irritability, alcohol use, extracorporeal circulation duration (cardiopulmonary bypass, CPB time), antegrade selective cerebral perfusion (ASCP) time, lowest partial pressure of oxygen (lowest PO2), mechanical ventilation time, blood loss, low PO2 and oxygenation index, hemoglobin (Hb), Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, and dihydroxyphenylalanine (DEX) were associated with higher odds of POD among type A aortic dissection patients. According to further analysis of multivariate logistic regression, ASCP time and irritability were confirmed as the independent factors for POD of type A aortic dissection patients.ConclusionsWe determined 2 independent risk factors for POD: ASCP time and irritability. Identifying and adjusting these risk factors are very important in reducing the incidence of POD among type A aortic dissection patients.

Simplified frozen elephant trunk technique for combined open and endovascular treatment of extensive aortic diseases.

This study aims to analyse the impact of a simplified frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique on early outcome. Between October 2010 and August 2018, 92 consecutive patients (mean age 64.4 ± 12.2 years) underwent FET surgery. Underlying pathologies were thoracic aneurysm in 35 patients, acute aortic dissection in 25 patients and chronic dissection in 32 patients. Thirty patients underwent a simplified FET technique with deployment of the stent graft in arch zone 2 with an extra-anatomic bypass to the distal left subclavian artery using the third branch of the Thoraflex™ Hybrid Plexus prosthesis via a supraclavicular access during reperfusion. These patients were compared to 62 patients who received the conventional FET procedure, in which a distal anastomosis is performed in arch zone 3. Circulatory arrest (41.7 ± 10.5 vs 76.5 ± 33.0 min; P < 0.001) and antegrade cerebral perfusion times (60.9 ± 13.5 vs 92.1 ± 33.1 min; P < 0.001) were significantly reduced in zone 2 vs zone 3 patients, respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.3% (n = 1) in zone 2 patients vs 17.7% (n = 11) in zone 3 patients (P = 0.75). Stent deployment in zone 2 was associated with significantly reduced rates of postoperative stroke [zone 2: n = 0 (0.0%); zone 3: n = 11 (17.7%), P = 0.046] and recurrent nerve palsy [zone 2: n = 1 (3.3%); zone 3: n = 14 (22.6%), P = 0.020). Simplifying the FET procedure leads to reduced circulatory arrest and cerebral perfusion times and improves early outcome.

Aortic arch surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest and unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion: Perioperative outcomes

ObjectiveThe study objective was to determine the effects of surgical procedures, circulatory management strategies, and cerebral protection strategies on the short-term outcomes of aortic arch surgery based on the 7-year clinical experience of a single center. MethodsWe analyzed the data of 1708 patients who underwent aortic arch surgery with definite hypothermic circulatory arrest and unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between 2009 and 2015. Logistic regression and random Forest regression analyses were used to determine predictors and their effects on outcomes. ResultsThirty-day mortality was 6.1%. Permanent neurologic dysfunction incidence was 4.8%. The proportion of patients requiring continuous renal replacement therapy was 7.9%. In multivariable analyses, age, DeBakey type I dissection, New York Heart Association score, coma, coronary artery bypass grafting, extra-anatomic bypass, and cardiopulmonary bypass time were independent risk factors for mortality. Age, DeBakey type I dissection, and cardiopulmonary bypass time were independent risk factors for permanent neurologic dysfunction. In the random Forest regression, the risk for permanent neurologic dysfunction and mortality increased when unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion time was more than 38 minutes and decreased with an increase in nasopharyngeal temperature when temperature was lower than approximately 24°C. The risk for permanent neurologic dysfunction, continuous renal replacement therapy, and paraplegia increased when temperature was greater than approximately 24°C. ConclusionsThe study showed that the largest reported cohort of patients undergoing aortic arch surgery with hypothermic circulatory arrest and unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion had reasonable morbidity and mortality rates. As a cerebral protection strategy, unilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion may have a 38-minute safety threshold. Moderate hypothermia should be maintained below 24°C to reduce the risk for permanent neurologic dysfunction, paraplegia, and acute renal dysfunction requiring continuous renal replacement therapy.

In the endovascular era, is elective open aortic arch surgery in elderly patients still justified?

ObjectiveThe data supporting performing elective aortic arch surgery in patients aged 75 years or older are equivocal. We evaluated short- and long-term outcomes after elective arch surgery in patients aged ≥75 years to determine whether complex arch operations are justified in such patients. MethodsOver a 10-year period, 805 patients aged 50 to 89 years underwent elective proximal or total arch surgery. Composite adverse outcome was defined as operative mortality, persistent (ie, present at discharge) neurologic event, or persistent hemodialysis. Multivariable logistic regression was performed in the entire group. ResultsMultivariable analysis showed that age at admission independently predicted composite adverse outcome, operative mortality, and prolonged (>48 hours) ventilator support (P < .0001 for all), but not stroke. The same results were shown in a subgroup analysis in which older age (80-89 years) was associated with composite adverse outcome, operative mortality, and prolonged ventilator support. In a Cox proportional hazards regression model adjusted for antegrade cerebral perfusion time and prior history of renal disease, patients aged 50 to 74 years had significantly better overall survival than patients aged ≥75 years (P < .001). ConclusionsAs endovascular technology evolves, having benchmark data from likely endovascular-therapy candidates is critical. This study, among the few to focus on elective aortic arch surgery in elderly patients, suggests that surgical intervention carries risk and that novel endovascular therapies are needed.

OC03 AXILLARY VERSUS FEMORAL ARTERY CANNULATION IN AORTIC ARCH SURGERY: A SINGLE CCENTRE EXPERIENCE

Background and Aim: The best strategy of arterial cannulation during aortic arch replacement is still debated. We reported our experience with the Axillary and Femoral artery cannulation, comparing the incidence of major neurological events and in-hospital mortality. Methods: Between 1996 and 2016, 938 consecutive patients (pts) underwent arch replacement in our center. We included only two groups of patients, according to the type of arterial cannulation: Axillary group with 282 pts and Femoral group with 409 pts. Baseline characteristics of the patients are reported in Table 1. Results: The hemiarch replacement was performed more often in Femoral group (57.2% vs 38.3%, p = .001). The Femoral cannulation was the most commonly used in urgent/emergent cases (56% vs 36.9%, p = .001). Cardiopulmonary bypass time (Axillary: 216.08 ± 61.47 vs Femoral: 203.78 ± 63.69; p = .001), Cross-Clamp Time (141.12 ± 47.5 vs 132.71 ± 49.10; p = .016), Circulatory Arrest Time (2.51 ± 1.74 vs 4.26 ± 2.49; p = .001) and antegrade selective cerebral perfusion time (69.19 ± 34.46 vs 58.84 ± 34.94; p = .001) were longer in Axillary group. Hospital mortality was similar between the two groups (12.1% vs 13.9%, p = .546) as well as for permanent neurological deficit (6.7% vs 7.3%, p = .881). Transient neurological deficit is significantly higher in the Axillary group (17.4% vs 11.0%, p = .022). Conclusions: Our study confirms that Axillary and Femoral artery cannulations were associated with similar outcomes after aortic arch surgery. The Axillary cannulation was used more frequently in complex repair of the aortic arch, while the Femoral can be still considered a viable option, especially in urgent/emergent cases.

Supra-aortic vessel reconstruction in total arch replacement for acute type A dissection: Comparison of en bloc and separate graft techniques

To compare the outcomes of the en bloc and branched graft techniques for supra-aortic vessel reconstruction in total arch replacement (TAR) for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). In 53 ATAAD patients with intact supra-aortic arch vessels undergoing TAR, the arch vessels were reconstructed using the branched graft technique in 35 patients and en bloc technique in 18, i.e. reimplantation of the innominate artery and the left carotid artery (LCA) and transposition of left subclavian artery to LCA. The early and mid-term outcomes were compared between two groups. The selective antegrade cerebral perfusion time in en bloc group was significantly longer (33±10 vs 24±7min, p=0.001). Operative mortality was 5.7% (3/53), including 1 and 2 in the en bloc and branched graft groups, respectively (5.6% vs 5.7%, p=0.981). Stroke occurred in 1 patient. No spinal cord injury occurred. At mean 4.3±1.6 years, clinical and CT follow-up were complete in 100% and 86% (43/50). No cerebrovascular accidents or upper extremity claudication occurred. There were 4 deaths and 1 reintervention in follow-up. Survival was 88.6% and 88.9% at 3 months, and 83.3% and 88.6% at 6 months, 3 and 5 years in the en bloc and branched graft groups, respectively (p=0.597). The arch vessels were patent in 100% (43/43) without stenosis or aneurysm. The modified en bloc technique could achieve comparable early and mid-term outcomes to the branched graft technique in patients undergoing TAR for ATAAD. This approach may be an alternative technique for ATAAD patients with intact supra-aortic arch vessels.