Annual Exacerbation Research Articles

Association of Exercise Tolerance with Respiratory Health Outcomes in Mild-to-Moderate COPD.

Rationale: Previous studies have identified exercise intolerance in patients with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The associations of exercise tolerance with lung function decline and acute exacerbation risk in mild-to-moderate COPD is unclear, especially in the community population. Objectives: We evaluated exercise tolerance in mild-to-moderate COPD and analyzed its associations with respiratory health outcomes. Methods: We analyzed data from the Early Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease community-based study of patients with mild-to-moderate COPD (post- bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.70 and FEV1 ≥50% predicted). Patients who completed questionnaires, spirometry, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline were included. Annual exacerbation assessment and spirometry testing were conducted for 2 years consecutively. Exercise tolerance was defined as the percentage of predicted peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak %predicted). We analyzed the association between exercise tolerance, annual lung function decline, and acute exacerbation risk. Measurements and Main Results: Overall, 338 patients were included in the baseline analysis, and 319 completed the 2-year follow-up. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of VO2peak %predicted was 79.8±13.7. Low VO2peak %predicted was associated with more chronic respiratory symptoms, worse lung function, severe emphysema, and air trapping at baseline. During the 2-year follow-up, a decrease of 13.7% (1-SD) in VO2peak %predicted was associated with a decline in pre-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC (difference=0.4%, 95% CI: 0.1%-0.7%, P= 0.003), and higher total exacerbation risk (relative risk [RR]=1.25, 95% CI: 1.08-1.46, P=0.004) after adjustment. Conclusions: Mild-to-moderate COPD patients with exercise intolerance have worse respiratory health outcomes, for which a low exercise tolerance as a prognostic marker.

Biologic therapies targeting type 2 cytokines are effective at improving asthma symptoms and control - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAllergic asthma is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease driven by aeroallergen exposure. In severe asthma, the current standard of care does not fully control disease symptoms, indicating an unmet clinical need. Biologic therapies targeting cytokines IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 have been shown to provide benefits to asthmatics over currently existing asthma treatments. ObjectiveTo review the effects of recently developed biologic therapies for asthma treatment. MethodsIn this meta-analysis, the impact of IL-5 and IL-4/IL-13 biologic inhibitors was critically appraised considering overall lung function, symptom control, and oral corticosteroid use in asthmatic patients. Trials were identified using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov. Clinical trials assessing participants with severe asthma over the age of 12 were included. ResultsThe meta-analysis included 6,600 participants from 14 trials published in 2013-2020. For IL-5 inhibitors, improvements in FEV1 (MD = 0.11, 95% Cl: 0.11-0.12), ACQ scores (MD = -0.4, 95% Cl: -0.41- -0.38), annual exacerbation rates (MD = -0.46, 95% Cl: -0.48 - -0.45), and OCS use (MD = -50, 95% Cl: -52.58 - -47.42) favored biologic treatment. Significant improvements in FEV1 (MD = 0.11, 95% Cl: 0.10-0.11), ACQ scores (MD = -0.20, 95% Cl: -0.22 - -0.18), and annual exacerbation rates (MD = -0.15, 95% Cl: -0.16 - -0.14) were also seen with anti-IL4/IL-13 biologic therapies. However, anti-IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors were associated with more adverse events than placebo (MD = 1.13, 95% Cl: 0.97-1.3). ConclusionBiologic inhibitors targeting Th2 cytokines are beneficial for improving overall asthma control.

Long-Term High-Flow Nasal Therapy in Patients with Bronchiectasis of Different Severity: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background/Objectives: High-flow nasal therapy (HFNT) has been shown to reduce exacerbations of COPD and some evidence displays benefits in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB) patients. The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of 12 months of home HFNT on the annual exacerbation rate between mild/moderate and severe NCFB patients, classified by the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI). Secondary outcomes were the evaluation of the dyspnea, pulmonary function, and sputum cultures in both groups. Methods: The study population included NCFB adult patients, with at least one severe exacerbation in the previous year on optimized therapy. NCFB exacerbations, dyspnea (mMRC score), pulmonary function test, and sputum cultures were assessed at baseline and after 12 months of HFNT. Results: A total of 86 NCFB patients were enrolled: 36 in the mild/moderate (BSI < 9) and 50 in the severe (BSI ≥ 9) group. A significant improvement in the annual exacerbation rate was found in both BSI ≥ 9 (p < 0.0001) and BSI < 9 cohorts (p < 0.0001), with a between-group difference of -1 (95% CI: -2 to 0) exacerbations per year (p = 0.0209). The change in the annual exacerbation rate was significantly correlated with BSI (ρ = -0.26, p = 0.0151) and with HFNT daily use (ρ = -0.22, p = 0.0460). The mMRC score significantly improved by -2 points (95% CI: -2 to -1) after treatment in both groups (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients with P. aeruginosa colonization decreased from 34.9% to 27.9%. Conclusions: Long-term HFNT reduces the annual exacerbation rate in NCFB patients and its effectiveness increases alongside disease severity and daily use of HFNT.

The Effect of Opioids and Benzodiazepines on Exacerbation Rate and Overall Survival in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on Long-Term Non-Invasive Ventilation.

Background: There is a growing concern that opioids and benzodiazepines can depress the respiratory drive and could contribute to worsening respiratory failure and higher exacerbation frequency in COPD. However, the relationship between the exacerbation rate and medication taken is poorly understood in patients with chronic respiratory failure due to COPD. Methods: As part of a service evaluation project, we analysed 339 patients with COPD who were established on long-term non-invasive ventilation (LT-NIV) at our tertiary centre. We investigated the relationship between benzodiazepine and opioid prescription and clinical outcomes as well as their impact on the exacerbation rate and overall survival following setup. Results: Before LT-NIV setup, 40 patients took benzodiazepines and 99 patients took opioids. Neither benzodiazepine nor opioid use was associated with changes in daytime blood gases, overnight hypoxia or annual exacerbations before NIV setup, but patients taking opioids were more breathless as assessed by modified Medical Research Council scores (3.91 ± 0.38 vs. 3.65 ± 0.73, p < 0.01). Long-term NIV significantly reduced the number of yearly exacerbations (from 3.0/2.0-5.0/ to 2.8/0.71-4.57/, p < 0.01) in the whole cohort, but the effect was limited in those who took benzodiazepines (from 3.0/2.0-7.0/ to 3.5/1.2-5.5/) or opioids (3.0/2.0-6.0/ to 3.0/0.8-5.5/). Benzodiazepine use was associated with reduced exacerbation-free survival and overall survival (both p < 0.05). However, after adjustment with relevant covariates, the relationship with exacerbation-free survival became insignificant (p = 0.12). Opioids were not associated with adverse outcomes. Conclusions: Benzodiazepines and opiates are commonly taken in this cohort. Whilst they do not seem to contribute to impaired gas exchange pre-setup, they, especially benzodiazepines, may limit the benefits of LT-NIV.

Inhaled colistimethate sodium in patients with bronchiectasis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection: results of PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II, two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials assessing safety and efficacy over 12 months

Chronic lung infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa is associated with increased exacerbations and mortality in people with bronchiectasis. The PROMIS-I and PROMIS-II trials investigated the efficacy and safety of 12-months of inhaled colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb. Two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of twice per day colistimethate sodium versus placebo were conducted in patients with bronchiectasis with P aeruginosa and a history of at least two exacerbations requiring oral antibiotics or one requiring intravenous antibiotics in the previous year in hospitals in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Switzerland, the UK, and the USA. Randomisation was conducted through an interactive web response system and stratified by site and long term use of macrolides. Masking was achieved by providing colistimethate sodium and placebo in identical vials. After random assignment, study visits were scheduled for 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (the end of the treatment period); and telephone calls were scheduled for 7 days after random assignment and 2 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary endpoint was the mean annual exacerbation rate. These trials are registered with EudraCT: number 2015-002743-33 (for PROMIS-I) and 2016-004558-13 (for PROMIS-II), and are now completed. 377 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-I (177 to colistimethate sodium and 200 to placebo; in the modified intention-to-treat population, 176 were in the colistimethate sodium group and 197 were in the placebo group) between June 6, 2017, and April 8, 2020. The annual exacerbation rate was 0·58 in the colistimethate sodium group versus 0·95 in the placebo group (rate ratio 0·61; 95% CI 0·46-0·82; p=0·0010). 287 patients were randomly assigned in PROMIS-II (152 were assigned to colistimethate sodium and 135 were assigned to placebo, in the modified intention-to-treat population), between Feb 12, 2018, and Oct 22, 2021. PROMIS-II was then prematurely terminated due to the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. No significant difference was observed in the annual exacerbation rate between the colistimethate sodium and placebo groups (0·89 vs 0·89; rate ratio 1·00; 95% CI 0·75-1·35; p=0·98). No major safety issues were identified. The overall frequency of adverse events was 142 (81%) patients in the colistimethate sodium group versus 159 (81%) patients in the placebo group in PROMIS-I, and 123 (81%) patients versus 104 (77%) patients in PROMIS-II. There were no deaths related to study treatment. The data from PROMIS-I suggest a clinically important benefit of colistimethate sodium delivered via the I-neb adaptive aerosol delivery system in patients with bronchiectasis and P aeruginosa infection. These results were not replicated in PROMIS-II, which was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and prematurely terminated. Zambon.

A comparison of the impact of anti-IL5/5r therapies in allergic versus non-allergic patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in a real-life setting

Objective This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of allergic patients (AP) and non-allergic patients (NAP) with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) treated with anti-IL5/IL5R biologic agents (mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab) over one year. Sub-analyses assessed treatment response variations between AP and NAP based on the biological used and compared outcomes among AP with and without fungal allergy. Methods Observational retrospective analysis. Clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, pulmonary function tests, Asthma Control Test (ACT) scores, oral corticosteroid (OCS) usage, and exacerbation frequency were assessed at the initiation of biological treatment and after one year. Results Sixty-five patients with SEA were included, 41 AP and 24 NAP. 55.4% were treated with mepolizumab, 33.8% with benralizumab, and 10.8% with reslizumab. Before anti-IL5/5R treatment, AP had worse baseline outcomes but there were no differences in pulmonary function. Mean annual exacerbation rate and percentage of patients requiring OCS and dose of prednisone were higher in AP than NAP. AP had significantly higher total IgE values. After one year of treatment, more AP discontinued OCS than NAP (p = 0.025). Both experienced a significant reduction in exacerbation frequency (p = 0.001) and improved respiratory function. 70.7% of AP and 60% of NAP improved ACT ≥3 points. There was no significant difference between AP and NAP using mepolizumab (p = 0.145) or benralizumab (p = 0.174) in reducing OCS. Conclusions Anti-IL5/IL5R reduced the need for OCS and improved asthma control, regardless of allergic status. Fungal allergy led to lower ACT scores and higher exacerbations than other allergens; both groups improved with anti-IL5/ILR.

Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in People With Cystic Fibrosis and Preexisting Advanced Lung Disease at Treatment Initiation

BackgroundElexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) is associated with increased forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), decreased exacerbation frequency, and increased body mass index (BMI) in people with Cystic Fibrosis (pwCF) [1, 2]. Landmark clinical trials excluded patients with advanced lung disease (ALD) as defined by FEV1<40%. We have previously reported an improvement in ppFEV1 of 7.9% after 3 months of ETI in people with CF and ALD (ACFLD)[3]. The long-term effects of ETI on this cohort are unknown. This study reports the efficacy of ETI following 24 months of treatment in people with ACFLD. Study DesignWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with FEV1<40% and/or other high-risk features defined by the 2019 CFF lung transplant guidelines who were started on ETI between September 2019 and February 2020. Response to therapy was assessed with repeat spirometry measured at 12 and 24 months. All measurements were taken outside of an acute exacerbation. Demographics and clinical data including BMI and pulmonary exacerbation frequency were extracted from the medical record. Results57 of 64 people with ACFLD showed improved lung function with a mean change in ppFEV1 of 6.74% (p = <0.001, 95% CI 4.25 – 9.23%) between baseline and 24 months of treatment. BMI increased by a mean change of 1.55 kg/m2 (p = <0.001, 95% CI 0.93 – 2.18 kg/m2) during this interval. The annual exacerbation rate between the year before ETI and 24 months on ETI declined with a median of 1 fewer per year (p = 0.0007). InterpretationPeople with ACFLD experienced a significant increase in lung function at 24 months on ETI, although less than those with higher baseline lung function compared to prior studies [1, 2]. They also had an increase in BMI and a decline in the rate of annual pulmonary exacerbations.

The Association of Depression with Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Cystic and Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cystic fibrosis (CF) are chronic conditions that profoundly impact quality of life. OSA, characterized by repeated episodes of upper airway collapse, can exacerbate CF symptoms due to nocturnal airway obstruction. Recent studies highlight the prevalence of OSA in CF patients, especially in adults, and its detrimental effects on health and quality of life. From April 2019 to December 2021, we conducted a study with 104 bronchiectasis patients at Marmara University Pendik Training and Research Hospital. After exclusions, 70 participants (35 CF and 35 non-CF) were included. Sleep parameters were assessed with polysomnography, and depressive mood was evaluated using the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). Daytime sleepiness was measured using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). The statistical analyses included t-tests, chi-square tests, and logistic regression. Among the CF patients, depressive mood was significantly associated with female sex (OR: 4.28, 95% CI: 1.27-12.04) and anemia (OR: 7.87, 95% CI: 1.50-41.27). Higher ESS scores indicated greater daytime sleepiness in the depressive groups (p = 0.051). Depressive CF patients also had a significantly longer disease duration and more frequent annual exacerbations. No significant differences were found in total sleep time, sleep efficiency, or sleep stages between the depressive and non-depressive groups. A lower forced vital capacity (FVC) was observed in the depressive CF patients, although not significantly. Depression is prevalent among adult CF patients with OSA, with significant associations with female sex and anemia. These findings underscore the need for integrated care addressing both physical and mental health aspects, including interventions for respiratory symptoms, anemia management, and sleep quality enhancement to improve overall quality of life.

Real-Life Response to Biologics in Severe Asthma with Nasal Polyposis: Insights from the Belgian Severe Asthma Registry.

Nasal polyposis (NP) is a comorbidity of type 2 severe asthma (SA) which could influence response to SA biologics. We evaluated (super-) response in SA patients with (NP +) and without NP (NP-) enrolled in the Belgian Severe Asthma Registry (BSAR). 914 patients, of whom 31% NP + , were included. At enrollment, NP + patients had higher annual exacerbation rates, higher number of emergency room visits and more elevated type 2 biomarkers. In the longitudinal subanalysis of 104 patients, both groups had significant and similar asthma responses to asthma biologics, except for a greater increase in FEV1 in the NP + group. Super-response was achieved in 33 patients (32%), irrespective of NP status or type of biologic. In conclusion, both NP + and NP - patients had positive treatment responses, with some able to achieve super-response. In SA patients with NP, a greater FEV1 improvement as compared to SA patients without NP was observed.

Ratio of plasma IL-13/TNF- ∝ and CXCL10/CCL17 predicts mepolizumab and omalizumab response in asthma better than eosinophil count or immunoglobulin E level

To date, most studies to identify biomarkers associated with response to the anti-interleukin 5 agent, mepolizumab, and to the anti-immunoglobulin E agent, omalizumab have focused on clinically available biomarkers, such as the peripheral blood eosinophil counts (BEC) and total immunoglobulin E (IgE). However, these biomarkers often have low predictive accuracy, with many patients with eosinophilic or allergic asthma failing to demonstrate clinical response to mepolizumab or omalizumab respectively. In this study, we evaluated the association of baseline pre-biologic plasma levels of 26 cytokines and chemokines, including T-helper 1 (Th1)-, Th2-, Th17-related cytokines, and their ratios with subsequent clinical response to mepolizumab or omalizumab. We defined clinical response as a reduction in the baseline annual exacerbation rate by half or more over the one-year period following initiation of the biologic. Baseline levels of plasma IL-13 were differentially elevated in responders versus non-responders to mepolizumab and plasma CXCL10 levels were differentially elevated in responders to omalizumab. The ratio of IL-13/TNF-α had the best sensitivity and specificity in predicting response to mepolizumab and CXCL10/CCL17 to omalizumab, and these performed better as predictive biomarkers of response than BEC and IgE. Cytokines and chemokines associated with airway eosinophilia, allergic inflammation, or Th2 inflammation, such as IL-13 and CXCL10, may be better predictors of clinical response to mepolizumab and omalizumab, than IL-5 or IgE, the targets of mepolizumab and omalizumab.

Five-Year Outcomes among U.S. Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry Patients.

Rationale: Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are prevalent among patients with bronchiectasis. However, the long-term natural history of patients with NTM and bronchiectasis is not well described. Objectives: To assess the impact of NTM on 5-year clinical outcomes and mortality in patients with bronchiectasis. Methods: Patients in the Bronchiectasis and NTM Research Registry with ⩾5 years of follow-up were eligible. Data were collected for all-cause mortality, lung function, exacerbations, hospitalizations, and disease severity. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without NTM at baseline. Mortality was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models and the log-rank test. Measurements and Main Results: In total, 2,634 patients were included: 1,549 (58.8%) with and 1,085 (41.2%) without NTM at baseline. All-cause mortality (95% confidence interval) at Year 5 was 12.1% (10.5%, 13.7%) overall, 12.6% (10.5%, 14.8%) in patients with NTM, and 11.5% (9.0%, 13.9%) in patients without NTM. Independent predictors of 5-year mortality were baseline FEV1 percent predicted, age, hospitalization within 2 years before baseline, body mass index, and sex (all P < 0.01). The probabilities of acquiring NTM or Pseudomonas aeruginosa were approximately 4% and 3% per year, respectively. Spirometry, exacerbations, and hospitalizations were similar, regardless of NTM status, except that annual exacerbations were lower in patients with NTM (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Outcomes, including exacerbations, hospitalizations, rate of loss of lung function, and mortality rate, were similar across 5 years in patients with bronchiectasis with or without NTM.

Benralizumab efficacy and safety in severe asthma: A randomized trial in Asia

BackgroundBenralizumab is indicated as add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled, severe eosinophilic asthma; it has not yet been evaluated in a large Asian population with asthma in a clinical trial. ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with severe asthma in Asia. MethodsMIRACLE (NCT03186209) was a randomized, Phase 3 study in China, South Korea, and the Philippines. Patients aged 12–75 years with severe asthma receiving medium- to high-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonists, stratified (2:1) by baseline blood eosinophil count (bEOS) (≥300/μL; <300/μL), were randomized (1:1) to benralizumab 30 mg or placebo. Endpoints included annual asthma exacerbation rate (AAER; primary endpoint), change from baseline at Week 48 in pre-bronchodilator (BD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 is being defined, not BD, which has already been defined) and total asthma symptom score (TASS). Safety was evaluated ≤Week 56. ResultsOf 695 patients randomized, 473 had baseline bEOS ≥300/μL (benralizumab n = 236; placebo n = 237). In this population, benralizumab significantly reduced AAER by 74% (rate ratio 0.26 [95% CI 0.19, 0.36], p <0.0001) and significantly improved pre-BD FEV1 (least squares difference [LSD] 0.25 L [95% CI 0.17, 0.34], p <0.0001) and TASS (LSD −0.25 [−0.45, −0.05], p = 0.0126) versus placebo. In patients with baseline bEOS <300/μL, there were numerical improvements in AAER, pre-BD FEV1, and TASS with benralizumab versus placebo. The frequency of adverse events was similar for benralizumab (76%) and placebo (80%) in the overall population. ConclusionsMIRACLE data reinforces the efficacy and safety of benralizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma in an Asian population, consistent with the global Phase 3 results.

New Drug for Management of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma: Tezepelumab

Abstract: Tezepelumab is a first-in-class human IgG2λ monoclonal antibody used to treat severe, uncontrolled asthma. Tezepelumab acts by hindering the action of thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), an epithelial-derived cytokine that triggers an immunological response by binding to TSLP and thereby preventing its binding with the TSLP receptor complex. TSLP has a critical role in Th2 immunity and plays an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma because it stimulates the production of Th2-associated inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin-4, interleukin-5, interleukin-9, and interleukin-13. It is the first biologic with no phenotypic or biomarker restrictions that has been approved for use in severe asthma. Tezepelumab is indicated in severe, uncontrolled asthma patients due to its safety, tolerability, and efficacy. Adults with severe, uncontrolled asthma experienced considerably lower annualised asthma exacerbation rates (AAERs) when administered with tezepelumab compared to a placebo. These preliminary results indicated that the TSLP-induced release of T2 inflammatory mediators may be reduced, and the sustained inhibition was maintained over a 52-week treatment period. In this review, we have summarised various phase III clinical trials and the mechanism of action of tezepelumab in severe, uncontrolled asthma.

Sustained Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Naïve and Biologics-Experienced Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Patients: Results from the ANANKE Study.

Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients often present overlapping inflammatory features rendering them eligible for multiple biologic therapies; switching biologic treatment is a strategy adopted to optimize asthma control when patients show partial or no response to previous biologics. ANANKE is a retrospective, multicenter Italian study (NCT04272463). Here, we outline the characteristics and long-term clinical outcomes in naïve-to-biologics and biologics-experienced patients treated with benralizumab for up to 96 weeks. Bio-experienced patients were split into omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets according to the type of biologic previously used. A total of 124 (76.5%) naïve and 38 (23.5%) bio-experienced patients were evaluated at index date; 13 patients (34.2%) switched from mepolizumab, 21 patients (55.3%) switched from omalizumab, and four patients (10.5%) received both biologics. The mepolizumab subset was characterized by the longest SEA duration (median of 4.6 years), the highest prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) (76.5%), and the greatest oral corticosteroid (OCS) daily dosage (median of 25 mg prednisone equivalent). The omalizumab group showed the highest severe annual exacerbation rate (AER) (1.70). At 96 weeks, treatment with benralizumab reduced any and severe AER by more than 87% and 94%, respectively, across all groups. Lung function was overall preserved, with major improvements observed in the mepolizumab group, which also revealed a 100% drop of the median OCS dose. Asthma Control Test (ACT) score improved in the naïve group while its increment was more variable in bio-experienced patients; among these, a marked difference was noticed between omalizumab and mepolizumab subsets (median ACT score of 23.5 and 18, respectively). Benralizumab promotes durable and profound clinical benefits in naïve and bio-experienced groups, indicating that a nearly complete depletion of eosinophils is highly beneficial in the control of SEA, independently of previous biologic use.

Positioning of Tezepelumab in Severe Asthma.

Asthma is one of the most common chronic diseases and is estimated to be severe in 3%-10% of affected patients. There is a need for additional biologic treatments that are highly efficacious across the spectrum of severe uncontrolled asthma. Currently available drugs inhibit 1 or 2 specific cytokines or IgE antibodies and thus only partially suppress the complex type 2 (T2) inflammatory cascade. Biologics targeting more upstream molecules in the pathophysiological pathway of asthma could treat asthma more effectively. Tezepelumab is a human monoclonal immunoglobulin G2λ antibody that targets the cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP). It is the first marketed biologic against an epithelial cell-derived cytokine, preventing binding of TSLP to its receptor and reducing the immune stimuli that TSLP can trigger in different asthma endotypes. Tezepelumab reduces downstream biomarkers of inflammation, such as blood and airway eosinophils, FeNO, IgE, IL-5, and IL-13. Tezepelumab provides a clinical benefit in severe asthma, reducing the annualized asthma exacerbation rate in patients with either high or low levels of biomarkers of T2 inflammation, although the effect is greater among those with high levels. The drug has been shown to improve asthma control, quality of life, and lung function and reduce airway hyperresponsiveness. Therefore, tezepelumab can be used across the spectrum of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma, especially in T2-high patients. This review includes a positioning statement by the authors, all of whom are members of the SEAIC Asthma Committee.

Real-world users of triple therapy for asthma in the US.

For patients with asthma who remain symptomatic on a medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist, addition of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist as a supplementary controller is a recommended option. However, real-world data on the characteristics and treatment patterns of these patients are limited. This study described the demographics and clinical characteristics of new users of single- or multiple-inhaler triple therapy and treatment patterns preceding triple-therapy initiation. This retrospective cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database. The study population comprised adults with asthma with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) initiating triple therapy with single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI; 100/62.5/25 μg) or multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) between September 18, 2017, and September 30, 2019. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns in the 12 months preceding triple-therapy initiation were described (baseline period). A total of 12,395 patients were included. Among FF/UMEC/VI initiators with asthma (n = 1301), the mean age was 49.0 years and 59.3% were women. During the baseline period, 81.5% of patients used controller therapy, 94.7% used rescue medications, and 42.0% reported at least 1asthma-related exacerbation; the annual mean exacerbation rate was 0.96. Similar trends were observed among patients with asthma initiating MITT and patients with comorbid asthma-COPD initiating FF/UMEC/VI or MITT. In real-world practice, triple therapy is often utilized following other asthma controller medication use. High disease burden, as evidenced by substantial use of rescue medications and continued asthma-related exacerbations, suggests that patients may not have achieved adequate asthma control prior to triple-therapy initiation.

Increased exacerbations of bronchiectasis following recovery from mild COVID-19 in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

Respiratory viral infection is a common trigger of bronchiectasis exacerbation. Knowledge of the intermediate to long-term effect of COVID-19 on bronchiectasis is poor. A retrospective cohort study of patient records was conducted to assess the frequency of bronchiectasis exacerbation following recovery from mild-to-moderate COVID-19. The exacerbation frequency at baseline, using 2019 and 2019-2021 data, was compared with that during the 1 year following recovery. A total of 234 adult patient records who had a confirmed diagnosis of bronchiectasis were identified, of whom 52 (22.2%) were classified as the COVID-19 group. Patients with COVID-19 had significantly more frequent annual exacerbations of bronchiectasis (total exacerbations and hospitalizations). Compared with 2019-2021 data, the total exacerbation frequency decreased by 0.1 ± 0.51 per year among non-COVID-19 patients but increased by 0.68 ± 1.09 per year among the COVID-19 group (p < 0.001). Compared with 2019 only data, exacerbation frequency decreased by 0.14 ± 0.79 per year among non-COVID-19 patients but increased by 0.76 ± 1.17 per year in the COVID-19 group, p < 0.001. The annual frequency of hospitalization for bronchiectasis increased by 0.01 ± 0.32 per year among non-COVID-19 patients and increased by 0.39 ± 1.06 per year in the COVID-19 group (p < 0.001) compared with 2019 to 2021 data. When compared with only 2019 data, it remained unchanged at 0 ± 0.43 per year among non-COVID-19 patients but increased to 0.38 ± 1.12 per year among COVID-19 patients (p < 0.001). Mild-to-moderate COVID-19 was associated with an increase in frequency of bronchiectasis exacerbation and frequency of hospitalizations following recovery.

P1029 Prevalance and risk factors of thromboembolism in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as a chronic inflammatory condition, can affect atherosclerotic process, arterial events, and increase the formation of venous thromboembolism. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of thromboembolism and the risk factors associated with acute thromboembolism in our IBD cohort. Methods A total of 3133 patients with 1414 Crohn's Disease (CD), 1667 Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and 52 Indeterminate Colitis who were admitted between 1999 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with acute arterial events and venous thromboembolism (n=39) during the follow-up period were compared with a control group (n=78) of the same gender and same diagnosis. Patients with Behçet's syndrome (n=126),systemic vasculitis (n=16) and hereditary thrombophilia (n=5) were excluded. Results Among 3133 IBD patients, number of patients with arterial events or venous thromboembolism at any time was 124, and the frequency was 3,95%. A total of 132 thromboembolic events, 86 arterial (65,2%) and 46 venous (34,8%) were recorded.Coronary artery disease was significantly higher in the UC group (2,3% vs. 1,2%; p=0.028). During follow-up, 40 acute thromboembolic events, 25 arterial and 15 venous, were seen in 39 patients (frequency 1,24%). There was no significant difference between the CD and UC groups in terms of acute thromboembolism (p=0.871). The presence of exacerbation, the presence of hospitalization, the number of priot hospitalizations and clinical activity at the last visit were associated with both arterial and venous thromboembolism; smoking history, age at diagnosis, body-mass index, non-mucosal CD (Montreal B2-B3) and higher basal CRP were associated with arterial thromboembolism only; higher CRP at the last visit, annual exacerbation frequency, presence of an additional inflammatory disease, presence of complications (surgery, abcess), longer total steroid traetment duration and also recent steroid therapy were associated only with venous thromboembolism. In regression analysis, recent steroid therapy and additional inflammatory disease were considered as independent risk factors for venous thromboembolism whereas age at diagnosis of IBD was considered as an independent risk factor for arterial events. Conclusion In addition to risk factors such as age, smoking and obesity, parameters indicating disease activity, inflammatory comorbidities and recent steroid therapy appear to be associated with acute thromboembolism in IBD patients.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Benralizumab in Japanese Patients with Severe Asthma: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study.

This study aimed to demonstrate whether benralizumab maintained the safety and effectiveness profiles established in randomized controlled trials among all patients with severe uncontrolled asthma initially prescribed benralizumab in the real-world setting in Japan. This was a prospective, observational, multicenter post-marketing study (ClinicalTrial.gov, NCT03588546). The safety and tolerability of benralizumab over 1 year were assessed by the incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and serious ADRs. Patient background characteristics indicating a more frequent onset of ADRs with benralizumab were explored. The main effectiveness assessment was the change in Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) score from baseline. Patients with baseline ACQ-5 scores ≥1.5 were defined as having severe uncontrolled asthma. In total, 632 patients were evaluated for safety and 274 for effectiveness; 139 patients were included in the severe uncontrolled asthma subgroup. ADRs were reported in 12.7% and serious AEs in 13.0% of patients. Serious infections occurred in 3.8%, serious hypersensitivity in 0.3%, and malignancy in 0.3% of patients. No helminthic infections occurred. In the effectiveness population, benralizumab improved the mean (standard deviation [95% confidence interval]) ACQ-5 score by -1.16 (1.40 [-1.36, -0.96]) from baseline; forced expiratory volume in 1 second by 0.151 (0.440 [0.09, 0.21]) L; and Mini-Asthma Quality of Life questionnaire score by 1.16 (1.29 [0.94, 1.38]) at the last observation. The annual asthma exacerbation rate was 0.42. A greater ACQ-5 score improvement was observed among patients with eosinophilic asthma characteristics. No new safety concerns were raised, and patients experienced benefits consistent with previous studies of benralizumab, thus supporting the use of benralizumab for the add-on maintenance treatment of patients with eosinophilic severe uncontrolled asthma.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of escalating to triple therapy versus switching to dual bronchodilators after discontinuing LABA/ICS in patients with COPD: a retrospective cohort study.

The latest guidelines discourage the use of long-acting beta2-agonists/inhaled corticosteroids (LABA/ICS) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the optimal subsequent treatment after discontinuing LABA/ICS. To compare the effectiveness and safety of switching from LABA/ICS to triple therapy (LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA)/ICS) or to dual bronchodilators (LABA/LAMA) in COPD patients. This was a new-user, active-comparator, and propensity score-matched cohort study analyzing the Taiwanese nationwide healthcare insurance claims. We recruited COPD patients switching from LABA/ICS to triple therapy or to dual bronchodilators from 2015 to 2019. The primary effectiveness outcome was the annual rate of exacerbations, and safety outcomes included severe pneumonia and all-cause mortality. Stratification by prior exacerbations was conducted. After matching, each group comprised 1892 patients, 55% of whom experienced no exacerbations in the prior year. Treatment with LABA/LAMA/ICS versus LABA/LAMA showed comparable annual rate of moderate-to-severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91-1.19). However, switching to LABA/LAMA/ICS was associated with increased risks of severe pneumonia (hazard ratio (HR), 1.65; 95% CI, 1.30-2.09) and all-cause death (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.09-1.78). In patients with⩾2 prior exacerbations, LABA/LAMA/ICS versus LABA/LAMA was related to a 21% reduced rate of exacerbations but with a twofold increased pneumonia risk and a 49% elevated risk of all-cause mortality. Switching from LABA/ICS to triple therapy versus dual bronchodilators in COPD patients was associated with similar rates of annual exacerbations but was related to elevated risks of severe pneumonia and all-cause mortality. Among frequent exacerbators, triple therapy was associated with lower rates of exacerbation but was accompanied by increased risks of pneumonia and mortality compared to LABA/LAMA. Careful consideration of the examined safety events is necessary when switching from LABA/ICS to triple therapy in COPD management.