Fixation Of Ankle Fractures Research Articles

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING FIBULAR NAIL FIXATION WITH OPEN REDUCTION INTERNAL FIXATION IN PATIENTS WITH UNSTABLE ANKLE FRACTURES

To compare the long-term outcomes of fibular nailing and plate fixation for unstable ankle fractures in a cohort of patients under the age of 65 years.Patients from a previously conducted randomized control trial comparing fibular nailing and plate fixation were contacted at a minimum of 10 years post intervention at a single study centre. Short term data were collected prospectively and long-term data were collected retrospectively using an electronic patient record software.Ninety-nine patients from one trauma centre were included (48 fibular nails and 51 plate fixations). Groups were matched for gender (p = 0.579), age (p = 0.811), body mass index (BMI)(p = 0.925), smoking status (p = 0.209), alcohol status (p = 0.679) and injury type (p = 0.674). Radiographically at an average of 2 years post-injury, there was no statistically significant difference between groups for development of osteoarthritis (p = 0.851). Both groups had 1 tibio-talar fusion (2% of both groups) secondary to osteoarthritis with no statistically significant difference in overall re-operation rate between groups identified (p = 0.518,). Forty-five percent (n=42) of patients had so far returned patient reported outcome measures at a minimum of 10 years (Fibular nail n=19, plate fixation n=23). No significant difference was found between groups at 10 years for the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (p = 0.990), the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (p = 0.288), Euroqol-5D Index (p = 0.828) and Euroqol-5D Visual Analogue Score (p = 0.769).The current study illustrates no difference between fibular nail fixation and plate fixation at a long-term follow up of 10 years in patients under 65 years old, although the study is currently under powered.

Splint versus no splint after ankle fracture fixation; Results from the multi-centre post-operative ankle splint trial (PAST)

BackgroundThere is considerable variation in the rehabilitation of ankle fractures. Ankle fractures treated surgically are often immobilized or splinted in the early post-operative period, despite the lack of robust evidence supporting this intervention. Thus, this randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the anecdote that splinting reduces pain and oedema. MethodsA prospective multi-centre randomized controlled trial was performed in three trauma centres. Eligible patients were over 18 years of age that have sustained an isolated unilateral ankle fracture requiring surgical intervention. Patients were randomized to two groups receiving either; a plaster of Paris posterior back-slab or compressive bandage dressing. The post-operative rehabilitation protocol was standardized across both groups. Baseline demographics and fracture characteristics and classifications were analysed. Primary outcomes included; oedema measured by the figure-of-eight-20 technique and pain at multiple time points. Secondary outcomes included; the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, satisfaction, unplanned emergency room (ER) visits and complications. ResultsA total of 104 comparable participants were included; 54 in the non-splint group and 50 in the splint group. There was no significance difference in ankle oedema, ankle oedema compared to contralateral ankle and pain scores between the two groups (P = 0.56, P = 0.25, P = 0.39 respectively). Patient satisfaction was higher in the early postoperative period in the non-splint group (P = 0.016). The AOFAS score was not significantly different across any time point (P = 0.534). In the splint group, there was a 46% rate of splint-related complaints and complications. Unplanned ER visits occurred in 46% of the splint group and 7.4% of the non-splint group (P < 0.001). There were 2 wound infections, 1 non-union and 1 deep vein thrombosis in the splint group. There was 1 wound infection and 1 deep vein thrombosis in the no-splint group (P = 0.481) ConclusionThe routine use of a splint does not add any perceivable benefit to the postoperative course of an ankle fracture fixation, particularly in the reduction of oedema and postoperative pain. Another key finding is that the absence of a splint does not appear to result in higher complication rates, instead leads to higher unplanned ER visits and lower early satisfaction rates.

Deep Deltoid Ligament Reconstruction Utilizing Suture Augmentation via an Arthroscopically- Assisted Approach: A Novel Technique and Case Series

Category: Trauma; Arthroscopy Introduction/Purpose: Deltoid ligament rupture is a common occurrence in the setting of acute ankle fractures. The indications for surgical restoration of the deltoid ligament complex vary considerably throughout the literature. If medial ankle instability exists after ankle fracture fixation, repair or reconstruction of the deltoid ligament complex may be performed, which is traditionally done via an open approach. While the superficial deltoid is easily accessed with an open approach, the deep deltoid ligament is extremely difficult to visualize. We present a novel technique for reconstruction of the deep deltoid ligament complex utilizing suture augmentation via an arthroscopically-assisted approach and present our outcomes. With this method, the deep deltoid ligament disruption is easily visualized and reconstructed in a minimally invasive manner through an accessory anteromedial arthroscopy portal. Methods: This is a technique guide and retrospective case series. Data was obtained via chart review including pre-operative, intraoperative, and post-operative follow ups. Variables such as age, weight, body mass index (BMI), sex, side, history of previous ankle surgery, preoperative ambulatory status, length of hospital stay, as well as disposition were documented. Radiographs were reviewed for evidence of restoration of the medial clear space as well as hardware position and bony union. In addition, a technique guide was developed using expert surgeon experience and opinion while using this novel technique. Results: 7 patients who underwent this novel technique were reviewed with an average follow up time of six months (3-8 months). All patients suffered bimalleolar or trimalleolar equivalent fractures. Patients were indicated for deep deltoid ligament reconstruction if medial ankle instability existed intraoperatively with valgus stress testing under fluoroscopy. Medial clear space decreased from a mean 11mm preoperatively to 3.3mm postoperatively. 6 patients returned to ambulation without brace by three months postoperatively. One patient demonstrated increased medial clear space measured at 6.6mm postoperatively and residual pain on follow up, but was treated conservatively and able to progress to weight bearing as tolerated by 6 months. One patient developed a keloid scar that required a steroid injection. No postoperative infections occurred. Conclusion: Deep deltoid ligament reconstruction utilizing suture augmentation via an arthroscopically-assisted approach should be considered in patients who have residual medial ankle instability after ankle fracture fixation. This novel technique allows visualization of the deep deltoid ligament complex and reconstruction in a minimally invasive manner via an accessory anteromedial arthroscopy portal. Our short term outcomes demonstrate success in restoring ankle function and radiographic parameters of the medial clear space. Further studies are needed to evaluate long term postoperative functional outcomes, stability, and development of post-traumatic arthritis.

Foot &amp; Ankle

The October 2023 Foot &amp; Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Risk factors for failure of total ankle arthroplasties; Effects of synovial fluid fracture haematoma to tissue-engineered cartilage; Coronal plane deformity in CMT-cavovarus feet using automated 3D measurements; Immediate weightbearing after ankle fracture fixation – is it safe?; Unlocking the mystery of Mueller-Weiss disease; Diabetic foot management: predictors of failure.

Hindfoot Stability Test: Introduction and Validation of a Diagnostic Test of Subtalar Instability in Deltoid Ligament injury Associated with Ankle Fractures

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/ Purpose: Deltoid ligament complex (DLC) injury repair in the presence of an ankle fracture remains a topic of controversy in the current literature. No work in the current literature has commented on hindfoot and subtalar instability in the presence DLC injury associated with ankle fracture fixation. Objective Our aim was to introduce and validate a new method for assessment of hindfoot instability, when fixing an ankle fracture with associated DLC injury. Methods: DLC injury, specifically superficial DLC, controls not only the ankle but the subtalar joint and medial longitudinal arch. Valgus stressing can unmask subtalar instability. It was noted by referencing the hindfoot position to a line parallel with the lateral aspect of the fibula, the lateral fibula line, subtalar instability was proabbale. We used six morphologically normal cadaveric specimens to validate the test. Results: Ten cadaveric specimens were used for validation of the hindfoot stability test. Pre-injury, no specimen illustrated bisection5-injury, all specimens showed bisection of the calcaneal tuberosity by the lateral fibular line on hindfoot stability test. Conclusion: The hindfoot stability test assesses hindfoot stability on valgus stressing of the hindfoot using the calcaneal tuberosity bisection of the a line drawn from the lateral border of the fibula as a reference point for instability. This was validated using morphologically normal cadavers.

Is there any Synergistic Effect of Perioperative Use of Pregabalin in Addition to Naproxen in Ankle Fractures? A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Opioid-centric pain management strategies have created an epidemic of prescription opioid abuse in the United States. Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesic regimens have spotlighted as alternatives to decrease postoperative pain. However there has been little study of the synergistic effect between naproxen and pregabalin. We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy, adverse effects, and long-term functional outcomes between perioperative uses of naproxen only and naproxen with pregabalin. Methods: This study was designed in 70 patients belonging to the 19 to 65 age group indicated for operative fixation of a rotatory ankle fracture under general anesthesia in 3 different hospitals. Group A received naproxen 500mg only, Group B received naproxen 500mg with pregabalin 75mg 2 hour before surgery and 12 hourly for 3 days thereafter. Minimal clinically important difference of visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was set 13 mm out of 100 mm. VAS for pain, opioid consumption, time for first use of escape injection, and any adverse effect were recorded at 6-, 12-, 24-, 48-, and 72-hour postoperatively. VAS for pain was checked at 2-, 6-week, 3-, and 6-month afterward and functional outcomes including Olerud and Molander score and ankle- fracture outcome of rehabilitation measure (A-FORM) were measured at 3-month and 6-month postoperatively. Results: Sixty-two patients (33 in Group A and 29 in Group B) completed follow-up until 6 months. Demographic data were similar between the 2 groups. VAS for pain scale was not significantly different between 2 groups at each time point until 6 months (P ≥ 0.520). Ninety-five percent confidential interval (CI) were within 13 mm at every time point except for at 6- and 12-hour postoperatively (95% CI -1.6 – 0.8, -1.4 – 1.0, each). There were no significant differences in opioid consumption, time for first use of escape injection, and functional outcomes between groups (P ≥ 0.163). Any adverse event at 48-hour postoperatively was significantly higher in Group B (P = 0.017). Conclusion: There was no clinically significant effect of perioperative use of pregabalin in addition to naproxen to reduce pain after operative fixation of rotatory ankle fractures. Rather it significantly raised adverse events after 48-hour postoperatively. Therefore additional use of perioperative pregabalin should be cautiously decided.

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Between Fibula Intramedullary Nail Fixation vs Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for the Surgical Management of Unstable Ankle Fractures

Category: Ankle; Trauma Introduction/Purpose: The fundamental concept of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable ankle fractures was anatomical reduction and firm fixation that allow early mobilization and rehabilitation. On the other hand, ORIF of ankle fractures is associated with complications including wound dehiscence, necrosis and infection, prominent hardware and failure. Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation (CRIF) using fibula nail was emerged as additional surgical option for unstable ankle fractures especially in elderly and medical high-risk patients. We hypothesized that fibula nailing for unstable ankle fractures would have similar functional outcomes to standard ORIF. The purpose of this study is to perform a prospective randomized study to compare clinical outcomes, bone union, and postoperative complications between ORIF and CRIF using fibula nail. Methods: A total of 59 patients (32 men, 27 women) with the mean age of 50.2 years were prospectively randomized to undergo standard ORIF or fibular nailing for unstable ankle fractures: those who underwent ORIF (31 patients 14 men, 17 women) and those who underwent CRIF using fibula nail (29 patients; 18 men and 11women). Exclusion criteria of fracture characteristics were open fracture and highly comminuted fibula fractures. Functional scoring including VAS, AOFAS and FAOS were evaluated at minimum postoperative 2 years follow up. In addition, union period, reduction status of fracture and ankle mortise at postoperative CT scan, complications including wound problem and posttraumatic arthritis were evaluated. Results: The VAS, AOFAS, and all FAOS subscales were not significantly different between two group at 2 years postoperatively (all, p&gt;0.05). Significantly fewer infections and wound complication occurred in the fibula nail group. (p &lt; 0.05; ORIF group (12.9%), fibula nail group (0%)). Postoperative at fracture site of fibula was high in fibula nail group (p &lt; 0.05; ORIF group (0%), fibula nail group (13.7%)), but there were no significant differences in the status of mortise and the rate of posttraumatic arthritis (all, p&gt;0.05). Conclusion: We concluded that the fibula nail allows acceptable reduction and secure fixation of unstable ankle fracture, with low soft tissue complication rate than ORIF. Considering the property closed reduction, the fibula nail would be an excellent treatment option for patients with unstable ankle fractures when indications is well selected

Effect of Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Overcompression on the Biomechanical Properties of the Ankle Bones: An In Vitro Cadaveric Model

Category: Trauma; Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Overtightening of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis during open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fractures remains a clinical concern, and there are limited data delineating the effect of syndesmosis overcompression on subsequent range of motion of the ankle joint bones. The primary objective of the current study was to determine the effect of syndesmotic overcompression on the relative range of motion (ROM) of the tibia, fibula, and talus, and to determine the syndesmotic fixation construct that most accurately restores native motion. Methods: Ten cadaveric lower limbs were utilized (78.3±13.0 yrs, 4F; 6M). A musculoskeletal simulator at ±7.5 Nm was used to test flexibility in dorsiflexion-plantarflexion, inversion-eversion, and internal-external rotation. After intact testing, syndesmotic probes were used to arthroscopically measure the intact position of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The force needed to compress the syndesmosis just beyond the intact position represented the intact force (100%), and overcompression was defined as 150% of the intact force. The anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), interosseus membrane (IOM), and posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) were then sectioned. Testing was repeated for destabilized, IOM reconstruction at 100% compression and 150% overcompression, IOM reconstruction plus AITFL fixation at 100% compression and 150% overcompression, and AITFL fixation alone. ROM data was reported as a percentage of the intact condition. Repeated measures ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test were performed to assess differences between conditions with p&lt; 0.05. Results: Average force needed to compress the syndesmosis was 71.0 ± 22.2 N. There was a significant increase in distal tibiofibular ROM in internal and external rotation for all conditions compared to intact (Figure 1) (p &lt; 0.05). In the axial plane, reconstruction of the IOM membrane did not restore the intact condition and was similar to the destabilized treatment, regardless of compression force. The addition of AITFL fixation significantly reduced distal tibiofibular motion compared to IOM reconstructions alone, but still did not approach the intact condition. Overcompression of the syndesmosis did not significantly affect relative ROM of the ankle bones in any plane (p&gt;0.05). Changes in the proximal tibiofibular ROM were similar in magnitude and direction as the distal tibiofibular ROM for all conditions. Conclusion: In the current study, overcompression of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis did not restrict relative ROM of the tibia, fibula, or talus. Reconstructing the AITFL in addition to the IOM decreased tibiofibular ROM, particularly in the axial plane. In the clinical setting, surgical reconstruction with dynamic fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis may result in increased ROM and mechanical stress at the proximal tibiofibular articulation.

Clinical application of posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap in curing plate exposure after ankle fracture fixation.

The study aims to evaluate the clinical application of posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap in the treatment of plate exposure after ankle fracture fixation. A posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap was used on 16 patients with plate exposure after ankle fracture fixation in our hospital between July 2018 and July 2021. The time required to harvest the flap, the amount of intraoperative blood loss, the duration of postoperative drainage tube placement, the outcome of the flap and the healing observed at the donor site are reported. The sizes of the flaps were 2.5-7.0 cm × 5.0-18.0 cm and averaged 4.0 cm × 12.0 cm. The time required to harvest the posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap ranged from 35 to 55 min and averaged 45 min. The amount of intraoperative blood loss ranged from 20 to 50 mL and averaged 35 mL. The duration of postoperative drainage tube placement ranged from 3 to 5 days and averaged 4 days. A total of 15 flaps survived and one flap had partial necrosis and survived after conservative treatment. All donor area defects were directly sewed and stitched without complications. There are multiple advantages of the posterior tibial artery or peroneal artery perforator flap, including simple preparation technique, reliable repair of the defects and without the need for performing microvascular anastomosis. It can be safely used in curing plate exposure after ankle fracture fixation and worth popularizing in grassroots hospitals.

Intramedullary Fibular Fixation in One-Stage Ankle Fracture Surgery With Soft Tissue Damage: A Study of 19 Cases.

This study investigates the efficacy of one-stage surgical intramedullary fibular fixation in managing ankle fractures with associated soft tissue damage. Ankle fractures, often encountered, can lead to complications when coupled with soft tissue injury. Traditional plate and screw fixation can exacerbate infection risks and reduce wound healing. To address this, a minimally invasive approach employing intramedullary fixation of the fibula has been proposed. This retrospective analysis, conducted between 2019 and 2021, explores cases of intramedullary fibular fixation for ankle fractures with stage 2-3 soft tissue injuries. A total of 19 patients were included in the study. The procedure involved either ulna intramedullary nails or locking screws. Results indicate that the approach led to successful union (100%),one superficial infection (5.26%), and no complication was observed. While limitations include the retrospective nature and small sample size, this study contributes valuable insights into the use of intramedullary fibular fixation in one-stage surgery for ankle fractures with concurrent soft tissue damage.

Attitudes and Practices Surrounding Opioid Prescriptions following Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius and Ankle Fractures: A Survey of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association Membership.

The past two decades have seen a significant increase in consequences associated with nonmedical misuse of prescription opioids, such as addiction and unintentional overdose deaths. This study aimed to use an electronic survey to assess attitudes and opioid-prescribing practices of Canadian orthopaedic surgeons and trainees following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius and ankle fractures. This study was the first to assess these factors following ORIF of distal radius and ankle fractures using a survey design. A 40-item survey was developed focusing on four themes: respondent demographics, opioid-prescribing practice, patients with substance use disorders, and drug diversion. The survey was distributed among members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize respondent demographics and outcomes of interest. A Chi-square test was used to determine if proportion of opioid prescriptions between attending surgeons and surgeons in training was equal. 191 surveys were completed. Most respondents prescribed 10-40 tabs of immediate-release opioids, though this number varied considerably. While most respondents believed patients consumed only 40-80% of the prescribed opioids (73.6%), only 28.7% of respondents counselled patients on safe storage/disposal of leftover opioids. 30.5% of respondents felt confident in their knowledge of opioid use and mechanisms of addiction. Most respondents desired further education on topics such as procedure-based opioid-prescribing protocols (74.2%), alternative pain management strategies (69.7%), and mechanisms of opioid addiction (49.0%). The principle finding of this study is the lack of a standardized approach to postoperative prescribing in distal radius and ankle fractures, illustrated by the wide range in number of opioids prescribed by Canadian orthopaedic surgeons. Our data suggest a trend towards overprescription among respondents following distal radius and ankle ORIF. Future studies should aim to rationalize interventions targeted at reducing postoperative opioid prescribing for common orthopaedic trauma procedures.

Technical note: Intraoperative ultrasound measurement for evaluating the stability of the inferior tibiofibular joint in patients with ankle fractures

ObjectivesInjury to the tibiofibular syndesmosis is a common complication of ankle fractures. Currently, it is challenging to determine the stability of the tibiofibular joint caused by ankle fractures during surgery. This study aims to establish a standardized method for dynamically evaluating the stability of the inferior tibiofibular joint under intraoperative ultrasound and assess its utility in surgery, thereby assisting in determining the necessity for fixation of the inferior tibiofibular joint after fracture reduction and fixation. MethodsThe stability of the inferior tibiofibular joint was assessed using an intraoperative ultrasonic external rotation stress test, with a torque set at 7.2 N·m. The measured parameters included the width of the inferior tibiofibular space in neutral (N) and external rotation (E) positions, stretch ratio (E/N), and injured/healthy side stretch ratio (I/H). Patients with Weber B or C type ankle fractures were selected as participants. ResultsFor the case with Weber C fracture, the N measurement was 4.22 mm after fracture fixation, while E measured 5.77 mm and E/N ratio was 1.37, which were larger than those on the healthy side (N: 4.17, E: 4.50, E/N:1.08), with an I/H ratio of 1.27. Intraoperative X-ray revealed instability of the inferior tibiofibular joint. After inserting a tibiofibular screw, the N measurement was 4.20 mm, while the E measurement recorded 4.32 mm, resulting in an E/N ratio of 1.03 and an I/H ratio of 0.95, indicating improved joint stability. For the Weber B fracture case, the N measurement was 3.55 mm after fracture fixation, while E measured 3.98 mm and the E/N ratio was 1.12, slightly lower than those on the healthy side (N: 3.94, E: 4.47, E/N: 1.13), with an I/H ratio of 0.99. The intraoperative X-ray revealed stability of the inferior tibiofibular joint. Therefore, no further fixation was performed on it. ConclusionStandardized intraoperative ultrasound stress test allows for real-time, dynamic assessment of the stability of the inferior tibiofibular joint after ankle fracture reduction and fixation, which can help guide the fixation of the inferior tibiofibular joint, thereby reducing the risk of postoperative traumatic arthritis.

Time-to-Surgery and Short-Term Outcomes of Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Introduction During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a rapid and significant transformation in patient management occurred across the healthcare system in order to mitigate the spread of the disease and address resource constraints. Numerous surgical cases were either postponed or canceled, permitting only the most critical and emergent cases to proceed. The impact of these modifications on patient outcomes remains uncertain.The purpose of this study was to compare time-to-surgery and outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation for trimalleolar ankle fractures during the pandemic to a pre-pandemic group.We hypothesized that the pandemic group would have a prolonged time-to-surgery and worse outcomes compared to the pre-pandemic cohort. Materials and methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted within a single healthcare system, examining the treatment of trimalleolar ankle fractures during two distinct periods: April to July 2020 (COVID-19 group) and January to December 2018 (2018 group). Cases were identified usingCurrent Procedural Terminologycode 27822. Information on demographics, fracture characteristics, and outcomes was obtained through chart review. Outcomes analyzed included time-to-surgery, mean visual analog scale scores, ankle strength and range of motion, and complications. Results COVID-19 and 2018 groups consisted of 32 and 100 patients, respectively. No significant difference was observed in group demographics and comorbidities (p > 0.05). Fracture characteristics were similar between groups apart from tibiofibular syndesmosis injury, 62.5% (20/32) in COVID-19 vs 42.0% (42/100) in 2018 (p = 0.03). Time-to-surgery was not significantly different between the two groups (8.84 ± 6.78 days in COVID-19 vs 8.61 ± 6.02 days in 2018, p = 0.85). Mean visual analog scale scores, ankle strength, and ankle range of motion in plantarflexion were not significantly different between the two groups at three and six months postoperatively (p > 0.05). Dorsiflexion was significantly higher in the COVID-19 group at three months (p = 0.03), but not six months (p = 0.94) postoperatively.No significant difference in postoperative complication was seen between groups, 25.0% (8/32) COVID-19 group compared to 15.0% (15/100) 2018 group (p = 0.11). Conclusions Patients who underwent surgery during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic did not experience prolonged time-to-surgery and had similar outcomes compared to patients treated prior to the pandemic.

702 Hindfoot Stability Test - Introduction and Validation of a Diagnostic Test of Subtalar Instability in Deltoid Ligament Injury Associated with Ankle Fractures

Abstract Aim Deltoid ligament complex (DLC) injury repair in the presence of an ankle fracture remains a topic of controversy in the current literature. No work in the current literature has commented on hindfoot and subtalar instability in the presence DLC injury associated with ankle fracture fixation. Our aim was to introduce and validate a new method for assessment of hindfoot instability, when fixing an ankle fracture with associated DLC injury. Method DLC injury, specifically superficial DLC, controls not only the ankle but the subtalar joint and medial longitudinal arch. Valgus stressing can unmask subtalar instability. It was noted by referencing the hindfoot position to a line parallel with the lateral aspect of the fibula, the lateral fibula line, subtalar instability was probable. We used six morphologically normal cadaveric specimens to validate the test. Results Six cadaveric specimens were used for validation of the hindfoot stability test. Pre-injury, no specimen illustrated bisection of the calcaneal tuberosity by the lateral fibular line on hindfoot stability test under fluoroscopy. Post-injury, all specimens showed bisection of the calcaneal tuberosity by the lateral fibular line on hindfoot stability test. Conclusions The hindfoot stability test assesses hindfoot stability on valgus stressing of the hindfoot using the calcaneal tuberosity bisection of a line drawn from the lateral border of the fibula as a reference point for instability. This was validated using morphologically normal cadavers.

237 Delay in Ankle Fracture Fixation Against BOAST Guidelines for Ankle Fractures

Abstract Aim Ankle fractures are common, and the majority are the result of low energy torsional trauma. The aim of treatment is to restore and maintain stability and alignment of the joint, ideally with normal anatomy of the ankle mortise. According to BOAST guidelines for ankle fractures, Early fixation within 24-48 hours is recommended in the majority of patients under 60 years when the ankle mortise is unstable. This study aimed at assessing our practice in managing ankle fractures against BOAST guidelines and infection rate assessment. Method Data was collected respectively from electronic patient records for three months period and entered excel. First cycle results were presented in a departmental audit meeting and recommendations to improve practice were acted upon. Second cycle data was collected three months later and for three months period. Final re-audited results were presented in a departmental audit meeting. Results First cycle results: only 11% of patients had their ankle fractures fixed within 48 hours and none of them had surgical site infection. 65.2 % of patients had their operations over a week with an Infection rate of 10.6%. Second cycle results: 19% of patients had their ankle fractures fixed within 48 hours and none had surgical site infection. 47.6 % of patients had their operations over a week with an Infection rate of 4.8%. Conclusions Second cycle results showed improvement in operative timing and surgical site infections rate against BOAST guidelines compared to initial first cycle results. Early fixation for ankle fractures is associated with lower infection rates.

FTP1.2 Delay in ankle fracture fixation against BOAST guidelines for ankle fractures

Abstract Aim Ankle fractures are common, and the majority are the result of low energy torsional trauma. The aim of treatment is to restore and maintain stability and alignment of the joint, ideally with normal anatomy of the ankle mortise. According to BOAST guidelines for ankle fractures, Early fixation within 24-48 hours is recommended in the majority of patients under 60 years when the ankle mortise is unstable. This study aimed at assessing our practice in managing ankle fractures against BOAST guidelines and infection rate assessment. Methods Data was collected respectively from electronic patient records for three months period and entered excel. First cycle results were presented in a departmental audit meeting and recommendations to improve practice were acted upon. Second cycle data was collected three months later and for three months period. Final re-audited results were presented in a departmental audit meeting. Results First cycle results: only 11% of patients had their ankle fractures fixed within 48 hours and none of them had surgical site infection. 65.2 % of patients had their operations over a week with an Infection rate of 10.6%. Second cycle results: 19% of patients had their ankle fractures fixed within 48 hours and none had surgical site infection. 47.6 % of patients had their operations over a week with an Infection rate of 4.8%. Conclusions Second cycle results showed improvement in operative timing and surgical site infections rate against BOAST guidelines compared to initial first cycle results. Early fixation for ankle fractures is associated with lower infection rates.

Ankle fracture internal fixation performed by cadaveric simulation-trained versus standard-trained orthopaedic trainees: a preliminary, multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Ankle fracture fixation is commonly performed by junior trainees. Simulation training using cadavers may shorten the learning curve and result in a technically superior surgical performance. We undertook a preliminary, pragmatic, single-blinded, multicentre, randomized controlled trial of cadaveric simulation versus standard training. Primary outcome was fracture reduction on postoperative radiographs. Overall, 139 ankle fractures were fixed by 28 postgraduate year three to five trainee surgeons (mean age 29.4 years; 71% males) during ten months' follow-up. Under the intention-to-treat principle, a technically superior fixation was performed by the cadaveric-trained group compared to the standard-trained group, as measured on the first postoperative radiograph against predefined acceptability thresholds. The cadaveric-trained group used a lower intraoperative dose of radiation than the standard-trained group (mean difference 0.011 Gym2, 95% confidence interval 0.003 to 0.019; p = 0.009). There was no difference in procedure time. Trainees randomized to cadaveric training performed better ankle fracture fixations and irradiated patients less during surgery compared to standard-trained trainees. This effect, which was previously unknown, is likely to be a consequence of the intervention. Further study is required.

Ankle fractures: High implant cost is not associated with better patient reported outcomes

IntroductionAnkle fractures comprise 9% of all fractures and are among the most common fractures requiring operative management. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plates and screws is the gold standard for the treatment of unstable, displaced ankle fractures. While performing ORIF, orthopaedic surgeons may choose from several fixation methods including locking versus nonlocking plating and whether to use screws or suture buttons for syndesmotic injuries.Nearly all orthopaedic surgeons treat ankle fractures but most are unfamiliar with implant costs. No study to date has correlated the cost of ankle fracture fixation with health status as perceived by patients through patient reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a relationship between increasing implant cost and PROs after a rotational ankle fracture. MethodsAll ankle fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) at a level I academic trauma center from January 2018 to December 2022 were identified. Inclusion criteria included all rotational ankle fractures with a minimum 6-month follow-up and completed 6-month PRO. Patients were excluded for age <18, polytrauma and open fracture. Variables assessed included demographics, fracture classifications, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure-Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL) score, implant type, and implant cost. ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference in cost between fracture types (p < 0.0001) with trimalleolar fractures being the most expensive. The mean FAAM-ADL score was lowest for trimalleolar fractures at 78.9, 95% CI [75.5, 82.3]. A diagnosis of osteoporosis/osteopenia was associated with a decrease in cost of $233.3, 95% CI [−411.8, −54.8]. There was no relationship between syndesmotic fixation and implant cost, $102.6, 95% CI [−74.9, 280.0]. There was no correlation between implant cost and FAAM-ADL score at 6 months (p = 0.48). ConclusionsThe utilization of higher cost ankle fixation does not correlate with better FAAM-ADL scores. Orthopaedic surgeons may choose less expensive implants to improve the value of ankle fixation without impacting patient reported outcomes.

Validation of the Stopping Opioids After Surgery (SOS) Score for the Sustained Use of Prescription Opioids Following Orthopaedic Surgery.

The Stopping Opioids after Surgery (SOS) score was developed to identify patients at risk for sustained opioid use following surgery. The SOS score has not been specifically validated for patients in a general orthopaedic context. Our primary objective was to validate the SOS score within this context. In this retrospective cohort study, we considered a broad array of representative orthopaedic procedures performed between January 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022. These procedures included rotator cuff repair, lumbar discectomy, lumbar fusion, total knee and total hip arthroplasty, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of ankle fracture, ORIF of distal radial fracture, and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The performance of the SOS score was evaluated by calculating the c-statistic, receiver operating characteristic curve, and the observed rates of sustained prescription opioid use (defined as uninterrupted prescriptions of opioids for ≥90 days) following surgery. For our sensitivity analysis, we compared these metrics among various time epochs related to the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 26,114 patients were included, of whom 51.6% were female and 78.1% were White. The median age was 63 years. The observed prevalence of sustained opioid use was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2% to 1.5%) in the low-risk group (SOS score of <30), 7.4% (95% CI, 6.9% to 8.0%) in the medium-risk group (SOS score of 30 to 60), and 20.8% (95% CI, 17.7% to 24.2%) in the high-risk group (SOS score of >60). The performance of the SOS score in the overall group was strong, with a c-statistic of 0.82. The performance of the SOS score showed no evidence of worsening over time. The c-statistic was 0.79 before the COVID-19 pandemic and ranged from 0.77 to 0.80 throughout the waves of the pandemic. We validated the use of the SOS score for sustained prescription opioid use following a diverse array of orthopaedic procedures across subspecialties. This tool is easy to implement for the purpose of prospectively identifying patients in musculoskeletal service lines who are at higher risk for sustained opioid use, thereby enabling the future implementation of upstream interventions and modifications to avert opioid abuse and to combat the opioid epidemic. Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Study of Functional Outcomes and Complications of Internal Fixation of Pott's Ankle Fractures in Diabetic Patients

Study of Functional Outcomes and Complications of Internal Fixation of Pott's Ankle Fractures in Diabetic Patients