According to the New York Tribune, Richard Bickerton Pemell Lyons, was ‘a model Embassador [sic]’. Made in 1862, almost half-way through Lyons’s diplomatic career, it was, in some respects, a perceptive comment, capturing the prevailing sense that he was a balanced and sober but, above all, professional diplomat; it is, however, also an ambiguous one, for, in praising Lyons’s courtesy, inoffensiveness and his fidelity to his instructions (and no more), the Tribune did not, in reality, offer a very precise definition of that model. Brian Jenkins refers to this judgement at different points in this meticulous biography of one of Britain’s pre-eminent nineteenth-century diplomats, agreeing with the notion that Lyons was unusually important, but lamenting that it has helped sustain imprecise and misleading understandings of Lyons’s work and impact. There is no doubt that Lyons was a significant figure in British diplomacy. Having first entered the diplomatic service as an unpaid attaché to Athens in 1839, he was soon given a paid role there, and during the 1840s and 1850s moved to postings in Dresden, the Papal States and Tuscany, before crossing the Atlantic to become Britain’s Minister to the United States in 1858. He was Britain’s minister in Washington during the American Civil War before taking up the ambassadorship in Constantinople in 1865, from where he then moved to Paris, serving as ambassador for twenty years from 1867 to 1887. He had the fortune, therefore, as Jenkins observes, to be ‘at the heart of four of the great international issues and crises of the second half of the nineteenth-century: Italian unification, the American Civil War, the decline of the Ottoman Empire, and France’s replacement by the newly unified Germany as the dominant continental power’ (p. 6). Jenkins narrates these episodes from Lyons’s perspective, and draws attention to the ways in which diplomacy continued to be shaped by the actions of a limited number of individuals—and so, for example, Lyons’s personal role in settling the ‘Don Pacifico affair’ with Greece in the 1840s is stressed; likewise his ability to smooth British-American relations and avert collisions in the 1860s (not least over the Trent affair)—and in so doing Jenkins sheds a useful light on the machinery of diplomacy. Lyons’s determination to uphold British ‘prestige’ and to use his missions and embassies as reflections of national standing, down to securing appropriate furnishings for public buildings and providing good dinners for dignitaries, show how that machinery could be effectively oiled. This is an important contribution, therefore, to diplomatic history, and, though it might be judged to be an exaggeration in some respects, one can see why Jenkins argues that, for example, Lyons ‘held the future of Anglo-American relations in his hands’ between 1861 and 1864 (p. 11). Indeed, while much attention to Lyons has tended to focus on his ambassadorship to Paris (when he had reached ‘the pinnacle of his profession’), Jenkins prefers to see Lyons’s time in the USA as the most important period, politically, of his career (p. 6). Thus, the Washington years occupy about as much space in the book as the Paris ones (approximately a third each).
Read full abstract