Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors Or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Research Articles

Evidence-based pharmacotherapy after myocardial infarction in France: Adherence-associated factors and relationship with 30-month mortality and rehospitalization

International guidelines recommend long-term use of evidence-based treatment (EBT) combining beta-blockers, aspirin/clopidogrel, statins and either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEIs/ARBs) after a myocardial infarction (MI), to reduce cardiac morbidity and mortality. To evaluate medication adherence after hospital admission for MI and the relationship with mortality and readmission for acute coronary syndrome. Observational, 30-month follow-up of patients admitted for acute MI in France in the first half of 2006 and still alive 6 months later. Data from the national hospital discharge database and the outpatient medications reimbursement database were linked for all patients covered by the general health insurance scheme (70% of the French population). A patient was considered as adherent when the proportion of days covered by a filled prescription was greater than 80%. The proportion of nonadherent patients was 32.0% for beta-blockers, 24.0% for statins, 22.7% for ACEIs/ARBs, 18.3% for aspirin/clopidogrel and 50.0% for combined EBT. Adherence to EBT was decreased significantly by age greater than 74 years, comorbidities and full healthcare coverage for low earners. Prior EBT use and stent implantation, before or during index hospitalization, increased adherence. After adjustment for patient characteristics and management, prior use of each class decreased mortality. Nonadherence to EBT after MI increased mortality and readmission (hazard ratio=1.43, P<0.0001). After MI, nonadherence to EBT is associated with a marked increase in all-cause mortality and readmission for acute coronary syndrome. Cost-effective strategies for adherence improvement should be developed among patient groups with poor adherence.

Proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus in kidney transplant recipients: impact of pre-existing proteinuria, graft function, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin-receptor antagonists

Proteinuria is a known side effect of therapy with sirolimus. The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB ) on sirolimus-associated proteinuria has not yet been assessed. A retrospective cohort study of renal transplant patients treated with sirolimus (n = 55) was performed. Of 55 patients, 24 (44%) had no proteinuria (<0.15 g/d) prior to conversion. Of 24 patients, 11 (46%) showed de novo proteinuria >0.15 g/d after 12 months, only 2 developed proteinuria > 1 g/d. The total number of proteinuria >1 g/d after 12 months including patients with pre-existing proteinuria >1 g/d (n = 3) was seven of 55 patients (13%). Multivariate regression analysis revealed pre-existing proteinuria > 0.15 g/d and reduced glomerular filtration rate as independent predictors for the development of proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus. Reduced glomerular filtration rate and pre-existing proteinuria but not therapy with ACEI/ARB are independent predictors for proteinuria after conversion to sirolimus. Treatment with ACEI/ARB did not reduce pre-existing proteinuria after conversion except in single cases with severe proteinuria.

Medication changes based on echocardiography in dialysis patients

Kidney/Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines recommend baseline echocardiography at the initiation of dialysis and every 3 years thereafter in patients for early detection of cardiac disease to optimize medical therapy. Because dialysis patients are at increased cardiovascular risk and thus most are already on cardioprotective medications, we hypothesize that serial screening echocardiography will not alter cardioprotective medications in dialysis patients. Retrospective analysis of medication administration of 231 dialysis patients was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups, those with and those without echocardiograms. Medication changes post echocardiography were compared with subjects without echocardiograms at comparable time points. The primary end point was the number of medication class changes that occurred in 2 months post echocardiography. Medication classes examined were beta blockers (BB), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), nitrates, calcium channel blockers (CCB), and statins. In the Echo group, there were 29 (19%) subjects with at least 1 medication class change post echocardiography, compared with 121 (81%) subjects without change. The number of patients on specific medication classes before and after echocardiography were BB (90 [60%] vs. 97 [65%], P=0.05), ACEI/ARB (74 [49%] vs. 82 [55%], P=0.01), nitrates (34 [23%] vs. 33 [22%], P=0.56), CCB (77 [51%] vs. 79 [53%], P=0.56), and statins (69 [46%] vs. 70 [47%], P=0.71). When compared with the No Echo group, there was no significant change in number of any medication classes. The occurrence of medication changes post echocardiography in dialysis patients is low and is not different than changes in routine care of dialysis patients without echocardiograms. Thus, serial screening echocardiography may not have added benefit to optimizing medical management of cardiovascular disease in dialysis patients. Further studies are warranted to demonstrate evidence for the use of serial screening echocardiography in this high-risk population.

Combined secondary prevention after hospitalization for myocardial infarction in France: Analysis from a large administrative database

Both French and international guidelines recommend long-term use of betablockers, antiplatelet drugs, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ACE-I/ARB) after a myocardial infarction (MI), but data on their combined use are scarce in France. To evaluate the use of combined medication 6 months after hospital admission for MI and the factors that can significantly influence their use. All hospital admissions for MI in France from January to June 2006 were selected from the national hospital discharge database. Data on medications used 6 months before and after hospitalization for patients covered by the general health insurance scheme (70% of French population) were collected from the reimbursement information system. A medication was considered to be used when there were more than three reimbursement applications over the 6 months following the index episode. Comorbidities were ascertained from the use of disease-specific medication reimbursements and registration in the national database of full coverage for 30 long-term disorders. Of the 11,671 patients included, 82% were reimbursed for betablockers, 92% for antiplatelets, 85% for statins, 80% for ACE-I/ARBs and 62% for all four classes. After adjustment, significant underuse was found for women, the elderly and those with several comorbidities. Treatment at a university hospital or high-volume centre, follow-up by a cardiologist and use of revascularization procedures were associated with improved rates of combination therapy use. Overall, use of recommended medications after MI in France is satisfactory, though not optimal. Specific recommendations focusing on subgroups such as older patients or those with comorbidities, as well as information directed towards non-specialized healthcare professionals, should help to improve appropriate use of these medications.

Associations of Kidney Function with Cardiovascular Medication Use after Myocardial Infarction

It is unknown whether adherence to recommended medications after myocardial infarction (MI) differs by kidney function. This was a retrospective cohort study of older patients who were discharged after MI in two Eastern states between 1995 and 2004. Patients were categorized as having ESRD, having chronic kidney disease (CKD), and being free from diagnosed CKD. Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB), beta blockers (BB), and statins was assessed within 30 d after discharge. Good adherence was defined as proportion of days covered >80% during the first year after discharge. Compared with patients with no CKD, patients with CKD had 22% lower adjusted use of ACEI/ARB but similar rates of BB and statin use. Patients with ESRD experienced 43% lower ACEI/ARB and 17% lower statin use. Only 64% (BB), 57% (statins), and 54% (ACEI/ARB) of patients had good 1-yr adherence. Adherence was similar between patients with CKD and with no CKD for all study drugs. Fewer patients with ESRD had good adherence to BB. With the exception of lower ACEI/ARB use in patients with CKD, we found no differences between patients with CKD and with no CKD in their use of and adherence to these cardiovascular medications after MI. Patients with ESRD experienced lower use of ACEI/ARB and statins and lower adherence to BB regimens. Postulated differences in medication use after MI across levels of kidney function are unlikely to explain the observed differences in long-term outcomes.

Use of recommended medications after myocardial infarction in Austria.

Guidelines recommend long-term use of beta-blockers (BB), statins, and angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor-blockers (ACEI/ARB) after myocardial infarction (MI), but data on their use after discharge are scarce. From Austrian sickness funds claims, we identified all acute MI patients who were discharged within 30 days and who survived ≥120 days after MI in 2004. We ascertained outpatient use of ACEI/ARBs, BBs, statins, and aspirin from all filled prescriptions between discharge and 120 days post MI. Comorbidities were ascertained from use of indicator drugs during the preceding year. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent determinants of study drug use. We evaluated 4,105 MI patients, whose mean age was 68.8 (±13.2) years; 59.5% were men. Within 120 days after MI, 67% filled prescriptions for ACE/ARBs, 74% for BBs, and 67% for statin. While 41% received all these classes and 34% two, 25% of patients received only one or none of these drugs. Older age and presence of severe mental illness were associated with lower use of all drug classes. Diabetics had greater ACEI/ARB use. Fewer BBs were used in patients with obstructive lung disease. Statin use was lower in patients using treatment for congestive heart failure (all P < 0.001). We conclude that recommended medications were underused in Austrian MI survivors. Quality indicators should be established and interventions be implemented to ensure maximum secondary prevention after MI.

Poor Prognosis of Japanese Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Following Myocardial Infarction-Comparison With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy-

Myocardial infarction (MI) is one of the major etiologies of chronic heart failure (CHF) in Japan. The prognoses of CHF patients after MI (n=283) were investigated by comparing them with those of CHF patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM, n=310) from the CHF registry (CHART; n=1,154). The Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses revealed that the 3-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in the MI cohort compared with the NICM cohort (29.0% vs 12.4%, p<0.0005). Age/gender/treatment-adjusted KM analysis revealed significant differences only in the cohorts with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), defined as LVEF >45%, or in less symptomatic patients (New York Heart Association I or II). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that beta-blocker (BB) was associated with a significant reduction in mortality from cardiac causes, and either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEI/ARB) was significantly related to the improvement of survival in the MI cohort (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.222 and 0.497, p<0.05), even though these medicines were used significantly less often in the MI cohort. Underlying MI has a significant impact on the survival of Japanese CHF patients, especially those with preserved LVEF or with fewer symptoms. The appropriate expansion of ACEI/ARB or BB therapy might be necessary to improve their survival.

Interactions between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma 2 gene polymorphisms and size at birth on blood pressure and the use of antihypertensive medication.

The combination of small birth size and the Pro12Pro variant of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma 2 (PPAR-gamma 2) gene has been shown to be associated with insulin resistance, which is linked to hypertension. We examined whether the association between small body size at birth and adult blood pressure is modulated by PPAR-gamma 2 gene polymorphism, and whether the use of any class of antihypertensive medication is related to birth size. A total of 500 subjects from an original epidemiological cohort of 7086 men and women aged 65-75 years attended a clinical study. Two hundred and eight of them (73 men and 135 women) were taking antihypertensive medication and are included in this study. The Pro12Ala polymorphism of the PPAR-gamma 2 gene was determined using the polymerase chain reaction single-strand conformation polymorphism method. Hypertensive subjects with low birth weight or short length at birth and the Pro12Pro variant had raised systolic blood pressure. We suggest that insulin resistance enhances the regulatory responses of the renin-angiotensin system, leading to raised blood pressure levels. Those hypertensive subjects who had small birth size and the Pro12Pro variant tended to use angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB). This could be because insulin resistance interacts with the renin-angiotensin system in ways that make ACEI/ARB an effective therapy. Alternative explanations include more severe and treatment resistant hypertension, leading to application of ACEI/ARB, or co-morbid conditions, such as myocardial infarction and type 2 diabetes, known to be linked to low birth weight.