Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve Research Articles

Pre-PCI CT-FFR Predicts Target Vessel Failure After Stent Implantation.

To investigate the predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to predict target vessel failure (TVF) after stent implantation. This retrospective study included 429 patients (429 vessels) who underwent PCI and stent implantation after CCTA within 3 months. All patients underwent coronary stent implantation between January 2012 and December 2019. A dedicated workstation (Syngo Via, Siemens) was used to analyze and measure the CT-FFR value. The cut-off values of pre-PCI CT-FFR for predicting TVF were defined as 0.80 and the value using the log-rank maximization method, respectively. The primary outcome was TVF, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), which was a secondary outcome. During a median 64.0 months follow-up, the cumulative incidence of TVF was 7.9% (34/429). The cutoff value of pre-PCI CT-FFR based on the log-rank maximization method was 0.74, which was the independent predictor for TVF [hazard ratio (HR): 2.61 (95% CI: 1.13, 6.02); P =0.024] and TVR [HR: 3.63 (95%CI: 1.25, 10.51); P =0.018]. Compared with the clinical risk factor model, pre-PCI CT-FFR significantly improved the reclassification ability for TVF [net reclassification improvement (NRI), 0.424, P <0.001; integrative discrimination index (IDI), 0.011, P =0.022]. Adding stent information to the prediction model resulted in an improvement in reclassification for the TVF (C statistics: 0.711, P =0.001; NRI: 0.494, P <0.001; IDI: 0.020, P =0.028). Pre-PCI CT-FFR ≤0.74 was an independent predictor for TVF or TVR, and integration of clinical, pre-PCI CT-FFR, and stent information models can provide a better risk stratification model in patients with stent implantation.

Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for Heart Team decision-making in multivessel disease: the randomised, multicentre DECISION QFR trial.

Vessel-level physiological data derived from pressure wire measurements are one of the important determinant factors in the optimal revascularisation strategy for patients with multivessel disease (MVD). However, these may result in complications and a prolonged procedure time. The feasibility of using the quantitative flow ratio (QFR), an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR), in Heart Team discussions to determine the optimal revascularisation strategy for patients with MVD was investigated. Two Heart Teams were randomly assigned either QFR- or FFR-based data of the included patients. They then discussed the optimal revascularisation mode (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) for each patient and made treatment recommendations. The primary endpoint of the trial was the level of agreement between the treatment recommendations of both teams as assessed using Cohen's kappa. The trial included 248 patients with MVD from 10 study sites. Cohen's kappa in the recommended revascularisation modes between the QFR and FFR approaches was 0.73 [95% confidence interval {CI} : 0.62-0.83]. As for the revascularisation planning, agreements in the target vessels for PCI and CABG were substantial for both revascularisation modes (Cohen's kappa=0.72 [95% CI: 0.66-0.78] and 0.72 [95% CI: 0.66-0.78], respectively). The team assigned to the QFR approach provided consistent recommended revascularisation modes even after being made aware of the FFR data (Cohen's kappa=0.95 [95% CI:0.90-1.00]). QFR provided feasible physiological data in Heart Team discussions to determine the optimal revascularisation strategy for MVD. The QFR and FFR approaches agreed substantially in terms of treatment recommendations.

Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery.

The Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) is an emerging technique that requires only 1 projection of coronary angiography with similar accuracy to quantitative flow ratio (QFR). However, it has not been validated for the evaluation of noninfarct-related artery (non-IRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) settings. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of μFR and the safety of deferring non-IRA lesions with μFR >0.80 in the setting of AMI. μFR and QFR were analyzed for non-IRA lesions of patients with AMI enrolled in the FRAME-AMI trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of Non-Infarction Related Artery Stenosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction), consisting of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention groups. The diagnostic accuracy of μFR was compared with QFR and FFR. Patients were classified by the non-IRA μFR value of 0.80 as a cutoff value. The primary outcome was a vessel-oriented composite outcome, a composite of cardiac death, non-IRA-related myocardial infarction, and non-IRA-related repeat revascularization. μFR and QFR analyses were feasible in 443 patients (552 lesions). μFR showed acceptable correlation with FFR (R=0.777; P<0.001), comparable C-index with QFR to predict FFR ≤0.80 (μFR versus QFR: 0.926 versus 0.961, P=0.070), and shorter total analysis time (mean, 32.7 versus 186.9 s; P<0.001). Non-IRA with μFR >0.80 and deferred percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than non-IRA with performed percutaneous coronary intervention (3.4% versus 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14-0.99]; P=0.048). In patients with multivessel AMI, μFR of non-IRA showed acceptable diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of QFR to predict FFR ≤0.80. Deferred non-IRA with μFR >0.80 showed a lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than revascularized non-IRA. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02715518.

Complete revascularization based on angiography derived fractional flow reserve versus incomplete revascularization in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Nearly half of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients present with significant multivessel coronary artery disease, they are at high risk of subsequent adverse events. Whether complete revascularization guided by coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (caFFR) further reduces such events risk is not fully investigated. In this study, 367 consecutive STEMI patients who underwent successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled. caFFR of all three coronary vessels were measured, including 367 culprit vessels and 703 non-culprit vessels. Complete revascularization was defined as post-PCI caFFR > 0.8 of all three coronary vessels. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization and non-fatal stroke/transient ischemic attacks) during follow-up. At a median follow-up of 3.8 years, MACE had occurred in 39 patients of the 220 (17.7%) in the complete revascularization group as compared with 49 patients of the 131 (37.4%) in the incomplete revascularization group (hazard ratio [HR] 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-3.0; p = 0.005). The incomplete revascularization in culprit vessels evaluated by caFFR showed the highest risk for MACE occurrence. In STEMI patients with multivessel coronary artery disease, incomplete revascularization based on caFFR might contribute to identifying patients at high-risk.

Diagnostic Performance of On-Site Automatic Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive standard method to identify ischemia-causing coronary artery disease (CAD). With the advancement of technology, FFR can be noninvasively computed from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Recently, a novel simpler method has been developed to calculate on-site CCTA-derived FFR (CT-FFR) with a commercially available workstation. A total of 319 CAD patients who underwent CCTA, invasive coronary angiography, and FFR measurement were included. The primary outcome was the accuracy of CT-FFR for defining myocardial ischemia evaluated with an invasive FFR as a reference. The presence of ischemia was defined as FFR ≤0.80. Anatomical obstructive stenosis was defined as diameter stenosis on CCTA ≥50%, and the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR and CCTA stenosis for ischemia was compared. Among participants (mean age 64.7±9.4 years, male 77.7%), mean FFR was 0.82±0.10, and 126 (39.5%) patients had an invasive FFR value of ≤0.80. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CT-FFR were 80.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.5-80.7%), 88.1% (95% CI, 82.4-93.7%), 75.6% (95% CI, 69.6-81.7%), 70.3% (95% CI, 63.1-77.4%), and 90.7% (95% CI, 86.2-95.2%), respectively. CT-FFR had higher diagnostic accuracy (80.6% vs. 59.1%, p<0.001) and discriminant ability (area under the curve from receiver operating characteristic curve 0.86 vs. 0.64, p<0.001), compared with anatomical obstructive stenosis on CCTA. This novel CT-FFR obtained from an on-site workstation demonstrated clinically acceptable diagnostic performance and provided better diagnostic accuracy and discriminant ability for identifying hemodynamically significant lesions than CCTA alone.

Coronary Artery Tree Description and Lesion Evaluation (CatLet) score for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis: a comparison study with pressure wire fractional flow reserve.

Pressure wire fractional flow reserve (FFR) and its derivatives, such as quantitative flow ratio (QFR), computational pressure flow-derived FFR (caFFR), coronary angiography-derived FFR (FFRangio), and computed tomography-derived FFR (FFRCT), have been validated for identifying functionally significant stenosis and guiding revascularization strategy. The limitations of using these methods include the side effects of hyperemia-induced agents, additional costs, and vulnerability to microvascular resistance. FFR is related both to the degree of a stenotic coronary artery and to its subtended myocardial territory. Coronary Artery Tree Description and Lesion Evaluation (CatLet) score (also known as Hexu) is a product of the degree of a stenosis and the weighting of the affected coronary artery (myocardial territory). Hence, we hypothesized that the CatLet score could predict hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease. They attended Sichuan Science City Hospital with at least one lesion of 50-90% diameter stenosis in a coronary artery of 2 mm or larger. FFR measurement was obtained during invasive coronary angiography. The CatLet score was obtained by multiplying a fixed value of 2.0 (for non-occlusive lesions) and the weight of the affected coronary artery. The primary endpoint was the CatLet score's diagnostic accuracy in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis, with a pressure wire FFR of ≤0.80 being used as reference. We analyzed the FFR and CatLet scores from 206 vessels in 175 patients with stable coronary disease and intermediate coronary lesions. The per-vessel analysis revealed an overall good correlation between the CatLet score and the FFR [r=-0.61; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -0.69 to -0.52; P<0.01]. We also noted a significant CatLet score-FFR correlation for each of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA). With a CatLet score ≥10 as a predictor of FFR ≤0.80, the overall diagnostic accuracy included a sensitivity of 78.80% (95% CI: 67.00-87.90%), a specificity of 85.00% (95% CI: 78.00-90.50%), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.25, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.25, and an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94). Equivalent vessel-specific results were also achieved for each of the LAD, LCX, and RCA. The CatLet score, solely based on visual estimation of the results of coronary angiography, demonstrated good diagnostic performance with respect to myocardial ischemia. Its clinical values in guiding revascularization warrant further investigation.

Long-term prognostic implications of CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve: Results from the DISCOVER-FLOW study

Background & ObjectivesThe long-term prognostic implications of CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) remains unclear. We aimed to explore the long-term outcomes of FFRCT in the first-in-human study of it. Materials & methodsA total of 156 vessels from 102 patients with stable coronary artery disease, who underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and invasive FFR measurement, were followed. The primary endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF), including cardiovascular death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Outcome analysis with FFRCT was performed on a per-vessel basis using a marginal Cox proportional hazard model. ResultsDuring median 9.9 years of follow-up, TVF occurred in 20 (12.8%) vessels. FFRCT ​≤0.80 discriminated TVF (hazard ratio [HR] 2.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06, 6.45). Among 94 vessels with deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), TVF risk was inversely correlated with FFRCT ​(HR 0.62 per 0.1 increase, 95% CI 0.44, 0.86), with the cumulative incidence of TVF being 2.6%, 15.2%, and 28.6% for vessels with FFRCT ​>0.90, 0.81–0.90, and ≤0.80, respectively (p-for-trend 0.005). Predictive value for clinical outcomes of FFRCT was similar to that of invasive FFR (c-index 0.79 vs 0.71, P ​= ​0.28). The estimated TVF risk was higher in the deferral of PCI group than the PCI group for vessels with FFRCT ≤0.81. ConclusionFFRCT showed improved long-term risk stratification and displayed a risk continuum similar to invasive FFR. Clinical trial registrationNCT01189331.

Diagnostic performance of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve and CT-derived fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that fractional flow reserves (FFRs) derived from invasive coronary angiograms (CA-FFRs) and coronary computed tomography angiography-derived FFRs (CT-FFRs) are promising alternatives to wire-based FFRs. However, it remains unclear which method has better diagnostic performance. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic performances of the two approaches. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Medline (Ovid), the Chinese China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), VIP, and WanFang Data databases were searched for relevant studies that included comparisons between CA-FFR and CT-FFR, from their respective database inceptions until January 1, 2023. Studies where both noninvasive FFR (including CA-FFR and CT-FFR) and invasive FFR (as a reference standard) were performed for the diagnosis of ischemic coronary artery disease and were designed as prospective, paired diagnostic studies, were pulled. The diagnostic test accuracy method and Bayesian hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) model for network meta-analysis (NMA) of diagnostic tests (HSROC-NMADT) were both used to perform a meta-analysis on the data. Twenty-six studies were included in this NMA. The results from both the diagnostic test accuracy and HSROC-NMADT methods revealed that the diagnostic accuracy of CA-FFR was higher than that of CT-FFR, in terms of sensitivity (Se; 0.86vs. 0.84), specificity (Sp; 0.90vs. 0.78), positive predictive value (PPV; 0.83vs. 0.70), and negative predictive value (NPV; 0.91vs. 0.89) for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A cumulative ranking curve analysis indicated that CA-FFR had a higher diagnostic accuracy than CT-FFR in the context of this study, with a higher area under the ROC curve (AUC; 0.94vs. 0.87). Although both of these two commonly used virtual FFR methods showed high levels of diagnostic accuracy, we demonstrated that CA-FFR had a better Se, Sp, PPV, NPV, and AUC than CT-FFR. However, this study provided only indirect comparisions; therefore, larger studies are warranted to directly compare the diagnostic performances of these two approaches.

Head-to-head comparison of two angiography-derived fractional flow reserve techniques in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndrome: A multicenter prospective study

BackgroundFFRangio and QFR are angiography-based technologies that have been validated in patients with stable coronary artery disease. No head-to-head comparison to invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been reported to date in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). MethodsThis study is a subset of a larger prospective multicenter, single-arm study that involved patients diagnosed with high-risk ACS in whom 30–70% stenosis was evaluated by FFR. FFRangio and QFR – both calculated offline by 2 different and blinded operators – were calculated and compared to FFR. The two co-primary endpoints were the comparison of the Pearson correlation coefficient between FFRangio and QFR with FFR and the comparison of their inter-observer variability. ResultsAmong 134 high-risk ACS screened patients, 59 patients with 84 vessels underwent FFR measurements and were included in this study. The mean FFR value was 0.82 ± 0.40 with 32 (38%) being ≤0.80. The mean FFRangio was 0.82 ± 0.20 and the mean QFR was 0.82 ± 0.30, with 27 (32%) and 25 (29%) being ≤0.80, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient was significantly better for FFRangio compared to QFR, with R values of 0.76 and 0.61, respectively (p = 0.01). The inter-observer agreement was also significantly better for FFRangio compared to QFR (0.86 vs 0.79, p < 0.05). FFRangio had 91% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 96.8% accuracy, while QFR exhibited 86.4% sensitivity, 98.4% specificity, and 93.7% accuracy. ConclusionIn patients with high-risk ACS, FFRangio and QFR demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance. FFRangio seems to have better correlation to invasive FFR compared to QFR but further larger validation studies are required.

Diagnostic performances of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios and Coronary Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve against conventional Wire-Based Fractional Flow Reserve.

Nonhyperemic pressure ratios (NHPRs) have been proposed as alternatives to fractional flow reserve (FFR) without induction of hyperemia. More recently, imaging based-FFR estimation, especially coronary angiography-derived FFR (Angio-FFR) measurement, is proposed to estimate wire-based FFR. However, little is known about the diagnostic performance of these indices against conventional FFR. We aimed to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of both NHPRs and coronary Angio-FFR against wire-based conventional FFR. PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed original articles up to 08/2022. The primary outcomes were the pooled sensitivity and specificity as well as the area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver-operating characteristic curve of those indices. A total of 6693 records were identified after a literature search, including 37 reports for NHPRs and 34 for Angio-FFR. Overall, NHPRs have a lower diagnostic performance in estimating wire-based FFR with an AUC of 0.85 (0.81, 0.88) when compared with Angio-FFR of 0.95 (0.93, 0.97). When all four modalities of NHPRs (iFR, Pd/Pa, DPR, RFR) were compared, those had overlapping AUCs without major differences among each other. Similarly, when the two most commonly used Angio-FFR (QFR, FFR angio ) were compared, those had overlapping AUCs without major differences among each other. Angio-FFR may offer a better estimation of wire-based FFR than NHPRs. Our results support a wider use of Angio-FFR in the cardiac catheterization laboratory to streamline our workflow for coronary physiologic assessment. FFR,, stable ischemic disease and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Rationale and design of a comparison of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided intervention strategy for clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial (FLAVOUR II)

IntroductionPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided by coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) has shown improved clinical outcomes compared with angiography-only-guided PCI. In patients with intermediate stenoses,...

A study on the first-order interaction of diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve

Objective: To investigate the effect of image quality, degree of stenosis, calcification, and their first-order interactions on diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR). Methods: This is a reanalysis of data from a multi-center retrospective cross-sectional study of CT-FFR in China. A total of 522 patients with suspected or known coronary heart disease [mean age: 61.6 (34.0-83.0) years, 71.8% (354/493) were male] from 11 medical centers including the General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command from May 2015 to October 2019 were enrolled. All patients underwent coronary CT angiography (CCTA), CT-FFR, and invasive FFR examination. Subjective image quality scores of target vessels were recorded on CCTA images, and stenosis was visually assessed at the lesion level. Calcification arc and calcification remodeling index (CRI) were recorded for each lesion. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were compared. Two-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the first-order interaction effects of image quality, degree of stenosis, and calcification. Results: A total of 493 patients with 629 lesions with invasive FFR as a reference were included in the study. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CT-FFR were 80.4%, 93.8%, and 88.6%, respectively. The specificity (95.0% vs. 87.3%, χ2=4.11, P=0.043); accuracy (90.1% vs. 81.9%, χ2=6.22, P=0.013); and NPV (89.7% vs. 80.9%, χ2=4.25, P=0.039) of the group with image quality ≥3 was higher than the group with image quality <3. The degree of stenosis affected the sensitivity, PPV, and NPV of CT-FFR and the calcification arc affected the specificity of CT-FFR (all P>0.05). The specificity (95.8% vs. 90.5%, χ2=4.23, P=0.040); accuracy (91.0% vs. 86.1%, χ2=4.01, P=0.045); and NPV (91.1% vs. 83.8%, χ2=5.10, P=0.024) of the group with CRI<1 were higher than that of the group with CRI≥1. In the subgroup of mild and severe stenosis, no calcification, and CRI<1, the accuracy of CT-FFR with image quality ≥3 points were higher than that with image quality <3 points. The accuracy of CT-FFR in the moderate stenosis group was mainly affected by CRI; the accuracy of CT-FFR in the group with CRI<1 was higher than that in the group with CRI≥1 (after Bonferroni correction, P values between groups were statistically significant). Conclusion: Subjective image quality, degree of stenosis, calcification of lesions, and their first-order interactions can all negatively affect the diagnostic performance of CT-FFR.

Quantitative flow ratio for non culprit lesions in ST elevation myocardial infarction and multi vessel disease - a direct comparison with fractional flow reserve

Abstract Objectives In acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (MVD), current guidelines recommend treatment of the culprit lesion followed by staged full revascularization of functionally relevant stenoses. We sought to analyze the hemodynamic relevance of intermediate stenoses using quantitative flow ratio (QFR, an angiography-derived fractional flow reserve [FFR]) in a population presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and MVD on index procedure. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 36 coronary lesions in 34 Patients presenting with STEMI and MVD from January 2017 to September 2022. 31 (86%) patients were male, mean age 63 ± 7, mean ejection fraction (EF %) 50 ± 8, arterial hypertension 30 (88%), diabetes 13 (38%). The non culprit lesion location was left anterior descending (LAD) in 24 (67%), circumflex artery (RCX) in 8 (22%) and right coronary artery (RCA) in 4 (11%). All patients received an invasive assessment of non culprit lesions using FFR within 3 months after STEMI. A QFR assessment of non culprit lesions in an acute invasive coronary angiography has been compared with FFR results in a staged procedure. Results QFR showed an excellent accuracy in ruling out functionally relevant stenosis with no false negative results (sensitivity 100% compared to FFR). Three coronary lesions (8,3%) were graded false positive (functionally relevant). Due to poor image acquisition, we were unable to perform QFR analysis in ten coronary lesions (28%). Overall specificity (56,5%) was lower than reported in previous trials. After excluding the lesions that could not be analyzed due to poor acquisition we achieved specificity of 81,2% (Fig. 1). Concusion: QFR showed an excellent correlation with FFR (Fig. 1). Performing QFR in STEMI Patients with MVD could reduce the need of repeated invasive coronary angiographies and optimize the clinical therapy management in this high-risk population. Further studies on diagnostic performance and outcomes are needed.Fig. 1: Correlation plot

Diagnostic accuracy of vessel fractional flow reserve compared to conventional diagnostic tools in patients with coronary artery stenosis

Abstract Background Wire-based fractional flow reserve (FFR) is currently the golden standard in a physiological assessment for intermediate coronary artery stenosis (CAS). However, the clinical advantage of FFR has been limited by its invasiveness. In the previous study with a small number of participants (334 patients), three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA)-based vessel FFR (vFFR) has shown non-inferiority to wire-based FFR in diagnostic accuracy. There has been no reports regarding the relationship between vFFR and other conventional physiological assessment tools. Methods The present study was a retrospective registry designed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of vFFR compared to the conventional reference standard (wire-based FFR ≤0.80). Between January 2019 and February 2022, patients with stable or unstable angina, and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome who had undergone physiological assessments [wire-based FFR, instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), and/or coronary computed tomography angiography-derived FFR (FFRCT)] before percutaneous coronary intervention were included for the present analysis. The exclusion criteria were ST-elevation myocardial infarction, previous coronary artery bypass grafting, cardiogenic shock, and adenosine intolerance. In the present study, we investigate the relationship between vFFR and conventional tools such as wire-based FFR, iFR, RFR, and/or FFRCT in patients with intermediate CAS, including multi-vessel disease, severe coronary calcium, in-stent restenosis, and hemodialysis. Results The study included 722 patients (mean age, 70±10 years; male, 80%) who underwent vFFR in 698 patients (97%), wire-based FFR in 711 (98%), iFR in 523 (72%), RFR in 109 (15%), and FFRCT in 48 (7%). Most patients presented stable angina (93%). In the present study, multi-vessel disease was identified only 20% of all. A total of 1108 target vessels were LAD in 549 (50%), LCx in 287 (26%), and RCA in 272 (24%), respectively. Bifurcation lesions and in-stent restenosis were present in 12% and 13%, respectively. The subjects were diagnosed several comorbidities, such as hypertension (77%), dyslipidemia (57%), diabetes mellitus (40%), and hemodialysis (12%). Overall, vFFR showed good correlations with wire-based FFR (r=0.70; p&amp;lt;0.001), IFR (r=0.57; p&amp;lt;0.001), and RFR (r=0.69; p&amp;lt;0.001). However, the correlation between vFFR and FFRCT was weak (r=0.36; p&amp;lt;0.001). Furthermore, vFFR had a good diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value; 81%, 88%, 82% and 87%, respectively) to identify the lesions with wire-based FFR≤0.80 (AUC, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90; p&amp;lt;0.001). Conclusion In this large number cohort, the 3D-QCA based vFFR has a good correlation with wire-based FFR, and a high diagnostic accuracy to detect the lesion with FFR ≤ 0.80 even in patients with severe coronary calcification, in-stent restenosis, and hemodialysis.Scatter plotsBland-Altman plots

Coronary Physiology Guidance vs Conventional Angiography for Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The AQVA-II Trial

BackgroundThe debate surrounding the efficacy of coronary physiological guidance compared with conventional angiography in achieving optimal post–percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) values persists. ObjectivesThe primary aim of this study was to demonstrate the superiority of physiology-guided PCI, using either angiography or microcatheter-derived FFR, over conventional angiography-based PCI in complex high-risk indicated procedures (CHIPs). The secondary aim was to establish the noninferiority of angiography-derived FFR guidance compared with microcatheter-derived FFR guidance. MethodsPatients with obstructive coronary lesions and meeting CHIP criteria were randomized 2:1 to receive undergo physiology- or angiography-based PCI. Those assigned to the former were randomly allocated to angiography- or microcatheter-derived FFR guidance. CHIP criteria were long lesion (>28 mm), tandem lesions, severe calcifications, severe tortuosity, true bifurcation, in-stent restenosis, and left main stem disease. The primary outcome was invasive post-PCI FFR value. The optimal post-PCI FFR value was defined as >0.86. ResultsA total of 305 patients (331 study vessels) were enrolled in the study (101 undergoing conventional angiography-based PCI and 204 physiology-based PCI). Optimal post-PCI FFR values were more frequent in the physiology-based PCI group compared with the conventional angiography-based PCI group (77% vs 54%; absolute difference 23%, relative difference 30%; P < 0.0001). The occurrence of the primary outcome did not differ between the 2 physiology-based PCI subgroups, demonstrating the noninferiority of angiography- vs microcatheter-derived FFR (P < 0.01). ConclusionsIn CHIP patients, procedural planning and guidance on the basis of physiology (through either angiography- or microcatheter-derived FFR) are superior to conventional angiography for achieving optimal post-PCI FFR values. (Physiology Optimized Versus Angio-Guided PCI [AQVA-II]; NCT05658952)

TCT-454 Correlation of IVUS-Derived Plaque Characteristics and Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

TCT-454 Correlation of IVUS-Derived Plaque Characteristics and Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Clinical Outcomes Based on Coronary Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve and Plaque Characterization

BackgroundCoronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) followed by computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) is now commonly used for the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). CTA-verified high-risk plaque (HRP) characteristics have also been reported to be associated with a greater likelihood of adverse cardiac events but have not been used for management decisions. ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes based on a combination of point-of-care computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (POC-FFRCT) and the presence of HRP in CCS patients initially treated medically or with revascularization based on invasive coronary angiography findings. MethodsCTA was performed as the initial test in 5,483 patients presenting with CCS between September 2015 and December 2020 followed by invasive coronary angiography and revascularization as necessary. POC-FFRCT assessment and HRP characterization were obtained subsequently in 745 consecutive patients. We investigated how HRP and POC-FFRCT, which were not available during the original clinical decision making, correlated with the endpoint defined as a composite of cardiac death, acute coronary syndrome, and a need for unplanned revascularization. ResultsCardiac events occurred in 20 patients (2.7%) during a median follow-up of 744 days. The event rate was significantly higher in patients with POC-FFRCT <0.80 compared with POC-FFRCT ≥0.8 (5.4 vs 0.5 per 100 vessel years; log-rank P < 0.0001) and in patients with HRP compared to those without HRP (3.6 vs 0.8 per 100 vessel years; log-rank P = 0.0001). POC-FFRCT <0.80 and the presence of HRP were the independent predictors of cardiac events (HR: 16.67; 95% CI: 2.63-105.39; P = 0.002) compared with POC-FFRCT ≥0.8 and absent HRP. For the vessels with POC-FFRCT <0.80 and HRP, a significantly higher rate of adverse events was observed in patients who did not undergo revascularization compared with those revascularized (16.4 vs 1.4 per 100 vessel years; log-rank P = 0.006). ConclusionsPOC-FFRCT <0.80 and the presence of HRP were the independent predictors of cardiac events, and revascularization of HRP lesions with abnormal POC-FFRCT was associated with a lower event rate.

Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on 3-year Outcomes in Patients with Stable Angina.

Background The prognostic value of coronary CT angiography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) beyond 1-year outcomes and in patients with high levels of coronary artery calcium (CAC) is uncertain. Purpose To assess the prognostic value of coronary CTA-derived FFR test results on 3-year clinical outcomes in patients with coronary stenosis and among a subgroup of patients with high levels of CAC. Materials and Methods This study represents a 3-year follow-up of patients with new-onset stable angina pectoris who were consecutively enrolled in the Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive CT-FFR in Coronary Care, known as ADVANCE (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02499679) registry, between December 2015 and October 2017 at three Danish sites. A high CAC was defined as an Agatston score of at least 400. A lesion-specific coronary CTA-derived FFR value of 2 cm with distal-to-stenosis value at or below 0.80 represented an abnormal test result. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause death and nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction. Event rates were estimated using the one-sample binomial model, and relative risk was compared between participants stratified by results of coronary CTA-derived FFR. Results This study included 900 participants: 523 participants with normal results (mean age, 64 years ± 9.6 [SD]; 318 male participants) and 377 with abnormal results from coronary CTA-derived FFR (mean age, 65 years ± 9.6; 264 male participants). The primary end point occurred in 11 of 523 (2.1%) and 25 of 377 (6.6%) participants with normal and abnormal coronary CTA-derived FFR results, respectively (relative risk, 3.1; 95% CI: 1.6, 6.3; P < .001). In participants with high CAC, the primary end point occurred in four of 182 (2.2%) and 19 of 212 (9.0%) participants with normal and abnormal coronary CTA-derived FFR results, respectively (relative risk, 4.1; 95% CI: 1.4, 11.8; P = .001). Conclusion In individuals with stable angina, a normal coronary CTA-derived FFR test result identified participants with a low 3-year risk of all-cause death or nonfatal spontaneous myocardial infarction, both in the overall cohort and in participants with high CAC scores. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02499679 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Sinitsyn in this issue.

Preoperative angiography-derived fractional flow reserve may predict coronary artery bypass grafting occlusion and disease progression.

Graft occlusion after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been associated with competitive flow of native coronary arteries. To assess with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) graft occlusion and coronary artery disease (CAD) progression of native vessels after CABG and their relationship with angiography-derived vessel fractional flow reserve (vFFR) performed before surgery. Between 2006 and 2018, serial vFFR analyses were obtained before CABG in each major native coronary vessel from two institutions. All patients underwent follow-up CCTA. In 171 consecutive patients, serial preoperative angiograms were suitable for vFFR analysis of 298 grafted and 59 nongrafted vessels. Median time between CABG and CCTA was 2.1 years. Preoperative vFFR was assessed in 131 left anterior descending artery (LAD), 132 left circumflex artery (LCX) and 94 right coronary aretry (RCA) and was less than 0.80 in 255 of 298 bypassed vessels. Graft occlusion was observed at CCTA in 28 of 298 grafts. The median preoperative vFFR value of native coronaries was higher in occluded compared with patent grafts (0.75 vs. 0.60, P < 0.001) and was associated with graft. The best vFFR cut-off to predict graft occlusion was 0.67. Progression of CAD was higher in grafted than in nongrafted vessels (89.6 vs. 47.5%, P < 0.001). Pre-CABG vFFR predicted disease progression of grafted native vessels (AUC = 0.83). Preoperative vFFR derived from invasive coronary angiography was able to predict graft occlusion and CAD progression of grafted coronary arteries.

Prognostic Value of Post-PCI Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

The post-percutaneous coronary intervention (post-PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) can detect suboptimal PCI or residual ischemia and potentially lead to fewer adverse clinical outcomes. We sought to investigate the predictive value of the angiography-derived FFR for adverse cardiovascular events in patients after PCI. We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, for studies published until March 2023 that investigated the prognostic role of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve values after PCI. We investigated the best predictive ability of the post-PCI angiography-derived FFR and relative risk (RR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between post-PCI angiography-derived FFR values and adverse events. Thirteen cohort studies involving 6961 patients (9719 vascular lesions; mean follow-up: 2.2 years) were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled HR of the studies using specific cut-off points for post-PCI angiography-derived FFR was 4.13 (95% CI, 2.92-5.82) for total cardiovascular events, while the pooled HRs for target vessel revascularization, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization were 6.87 (95% CI, 4.93-9.56), 6.17 (95% CI, 3.52-10.80), 3.98 (95% CI, 2.37-6.66) and 6.27 (95% CI, 3.08-12.79), respectively. In a sensitivity analysis of three studies with 1789 patients assessing the predictive role of the post-PCI angiography-derived FFR as a continuous variable, we found a 58% risk reduction for future adverse events per 0.1 increase in the post-PCI angiography-derived FFR value. In conclusion, post-PCI angiography-derived FFR is an effective tool for predicting adverse cardiovascular events and could be potentially used in decision making, both during PCI and in the long-term follow-up.