Abstract Introduction Experimental biomarkers including Angiopoietin-2 (ANG2), bone morphogenetic protein 10 (BMP10), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 7 (IGFBP7) are hypothesized to reflect cardiac pathophysiological processes that are potentially present in adverse cardiac remodeling in volume or pressure overload. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between these circulating biomarkers and the presence of hemodynamically significant pressure or volume overload and adverse outcomes and compare it to N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Methods We studied the association between the four experimental circulating biomarkers in patients with pressure or volume overload with reference to none/mild valvular disease in N=1302 of an observational outpatient cardiology cohort. The median age was 63.0 (25th/75th quartile 51.5, 71.4) years, 445 (34.2%) were women. Circulating biomarkers were quantified using a novel antibody-based method. Logistic regression models with cox regression plots were employed to assess the association of each biomarker with the severity of valve disease concerning volume or pressure overload, adjusted for age and sex. Results In the overall population, elevated levels of ANG2, BMP10, FGF23 and IGFB7 were positively associated with the presence of significant volume overload (ANG2: Odds ratio (OR) 1.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.35), p<0.001; BMP10: OR 2.57 (CI 1.89-3.48), p<0.001; FGF23: OR 1.51 (CI 1.14-1.20), p=0.004; IGFBP7: OR 1.39 (CI 1.14-1.69), p=0.001, NT-proBNP: OR 1.69 (CI 1.47-1.95), p<0.001). No statistically significant association between circulating biomarkers and pressure overload was observed. Over a median follow-up of 4 years, 31 (20.1%) participants died in the group of volume overload and 9 (40.9%) individuals in the group of pressure overload. After multivariable-adjustment, elevated levels of BMP 10 showed a borderline association with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in individuals with volume overload compared to none/mild valvular disease: hazard ratio (HR) 1.51 (CI 0.96- 2.38), p=0.075. Higher concentrations of all biomarkers were predictive of all-cause mortality for both individuals with volume overload and those with none/mild valvular disease (ANG2: HR 3.72 (CI 1.67-8.33), p=0.001; BMP10: HR 1.65 (CI 1.20-2.26), p=0.002; FGF23: HR 2.08 (CI 1.65-2.62), p<0.001; IGFBP7: HR 1.55 (CI 1.25-1.91), p<0.001; NT-proBNP: HR 1.72 (CI 1.47-2.00), p<0.001). Conclusions This study demonstrates that circulating biomarkers involved in distinct pathophysiological pathways of inflammation, fibrosis and calcification are elevated in patients with hemodynamically significant volume overload. Since they are also related to mortality, their clinical role needs to be explored further, also in context with the routine biomarker NT-proBNP.