Aneurysm Sac Size Research Articles

TREO Aortic Endograft Demonstrates Superior Aneurysmal Sac Regression Over Mid-Term Follow-Up

IntroductionAneurysmal sac regression is a predictor of long-term outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to compare a large cohort of TREO and non-TREO endografts over a mid-term follow-up and compare abdominal aortic aneurysm sac regression. The hypothesis was that TREO endografts have an increased sac regression by 24 mo. MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of all EVARs completed at a single institution between 2015 and 2024. Clinical and imaging data were collected from an institutional database and patients’ records. The analysis included all TREO and age, sex, anticoagulation use and current smoking-matched non-TREO endografts that satisfied anatomic indications for use of the TREO graft. The primary outcomes were sac regression at 12 and 24 mo, and secondary outcomes were rates of mortality, endoleak, and reintervention. ResultsTwenty-one TREO grafts were matched to 68 non-TREO grafts. The groups were similar in demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative anatomy. Preoperative abdominal aortic aneurysm sac size was larger in the TREO cohort. The mean reduction in sac size in mm was greater in the TREO cohort compared to the non-TREO cohort (−12.6 ± 8.95 versus −7.83 ± 7.74 mm, P = 0.039) over the study period. Cox regression analysis identified the TREO stent graft to be associated with 1-y sac regression (hazard ratio = 2.42, P = 0.019). The incidence of all-cause endoleaks, reintervention, and mortality were similar between cohorts. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that the TREO endograft offers better mid-term outcomes with respect to sac regression with no differences in the incidence of endoleak, mortality, or reintervention.

Transcirculation Approaches to Endovascular Flow Diversion of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review With Technical Considerations.

Flow diversion (FD) of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) is an increasingly used and efficacious treatment modality. Transcirculation approaches, or approaches that cross the contralateral or anteroposterior arterial supply before reaching a target vessel, have been used to treat cerebrovascular pathologies when traditional approaches are unsuitable or require intraoperative complication management. This study sought to review IAs treated with FD using a transcirculation approach to determine the technique's safety and efficacy. A systematic review of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases was completed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were included if they described transcirculation approaches in adult patients with IAs undergoing FD. Outcomes of interest included intraoperative complications and aneurysm occlusion rates. Twelve studies with 19 patients (N = 19, mean age = 54.1 y, 89.5% female) were identified. Wide-necked (N = 5, 26.3%) and saccular (N = 5, 26.3%) aneurysms were most represented, while 57.9% (N = 11) of aneurysms were unruptured and 15.8% (N = 3) of aneurysms were ruptured. The mean aneurysm sac and neck size were 16.9 mm and 11.9 mm, respectively. The most commonly deployed flow diverter was the Pipeline Embolization Device (N = 14, 73.9%). Successful FD (complete occlusion and/or good wall apposition) was recorded in 84.6% of qualifying patients with follow-up data, while 2 patients (15.4%) developed an intraoperative carotid-cavernous fistula. Transcirculation approaches to FD offer neurointerventionalists a safe and efficacious method for device deployment, rescue scenarios, and challenging anatomy. Prospective studies may determine the most appropriate indications for transcirculation approaches to FD, while novel, lower profile devices may improve its technical feasibility and safety.

Preemptive Embolization of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Sac Side Branch Arteries Promotes Early Sac Shrinkage after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair 1

The association between the occlusion rate of the side branch arteries branching from the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac and aneurysm sac shrinkage is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive embolization of multiple side branch arteries branching from the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac in early aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair. Patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, with or without preemptive embolization of multiple side branch arteries, including the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries, between January 2016 and August 2021, were retrospectively evaluated. Preemptive embolization was introduced at our institution in January 2018 and has been performed in all patients who undergo endovascular aneurysm repair since then. We compared occlusion rates of the side branch arteries, frequency of type 2 endoleaks, changes in aneurysm sac size, percentage of aneurysm sac size decrease, and frequency of reduction in the aneurysm sac diameter by>5mm. The study included 43 patients in the embolization group and 20 in the nonembolization group. Preemptive embolization was successfully performed without any ischemic complications. The total occlusion rate of side branch arteries was significantly higher in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group (70.2% vs. 29.3%, P<0.05). At 24months of follow-up, the type 2 endoleak frequency was significantly lower in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group (6.9% vs. 31.6%, P<0.05). The frequency of reduction in the aneurysm sac diameter by>5mm was significantly higher in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group at 24months (62.1% vs. 31.6% P<0.05). The optimal cutoff value for the total occlusion rate of the side branch arteries to achieve reduction in the aneurysm sac diameter by>5mm at 24months, after endovascular aneurysm repair, was 66.7% in all patients (area under the curve=0.634; sensitivity=62.5%; specificity=70.8%). These findings suggest that occluding 66.7% or more of the side branch arteries may result in early aneurysmal shrinkage. Preemptive embolization of multiple side branch arteries, branching from the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac, may contribute to early aneurysm sac shrinkage; this may serve as a marker for fewer late complications after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Aneurysm Sac Size Post-EVAR as a Useful Marker for Future Endoleak: A Retrospective Review

Aneurysm Sac Size Post-EVAR as a Useful Marker for Future Endoleak: A Retrospective Review

Association of simple renal cysts to aneurysm sac shrinkage in true thoracic aortic aneurysms after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

BackgroundAn increased prevalence of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) has been demonstrated in patients with simple renal cysts (SRC); patients with SRC have a less elastic aortic wall than those without SRC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate aneurysm sac shrinkage after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for true TAA in patients with and without SRC. MethodsOne hundred three patients with true aneurysms of the thoracic aorta who underwent TEVAR at our university hospital from November 2013 to December 2021 were included in this study. Aneurysm sac size was compared between that on baseline preoperative computed tomography and that on postoperative computed tomography scans at 1 year. A change in aneurysm sac size ≥5 mm was considered to be significant, whether due to expansion or shrinkage. ResultsThe patients were divided into two groups: those with SRC (46 patients [45%]) and those without SRC (57 patients [55%]). At 1 year, there was a significant difference in the proportion of aneurysm sac shrinkage between patients with SRC and those without SRC (23.9% vs 59.6%; P < .001). Patients with SRC showed significantly less aneurysm sac shrinkage than those without SRC (−1.8 ± 5.6 mm vs −5.1 ± 6.6 mm; P = .009). Univariable and multivariable analyses showed that the initial sac diameter (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.14; P = .002) and the presence of SRC (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.40; P < .001) were positively and negatively associated with aneurysm sac shrinkage after TEVAR, respectively. ConclusionsThe presence of a SRC was independently associated with failure of aneurysm sac shrinkage after TEVAR for true TAA. This suggests that the presence of a SRC may be a predictor for the failure of aneurysm sac shrinkage after TEVAR.

Effects of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on the Outcomes of Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a frequent comorbid condition in patients with aortic aneurysms. Severe COPD is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm rupture and perioperative complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients with COPD after fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair F-BEVAR. During a 5-year period, 387 patients (71% male) had undergone F-BEVAR at a single institution. The outcomes were compared between patients with and without COPD. The end points included perioperative mortality, pulmonary complications, and major adverse events. Patient survival and late complications were assessed using life-table and Cox regression analysis. The median age was 72 years (interquartile range [IQR], 68-79 years). Suprarenal (36%), juxtarenal (25%), and thoracoabdominal (39%) aortic aneurysms were treated. Technical success was achieved in 384 patients (99.2%). In-patient or 30-day mortality was 2.8%. History of COPD was identified in 180 patients (46%). No significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or aneurysm sac size or type were identified between both groups, except for a more frequent history of smoking (91% vs 82%; P = .003). Among patients with COPD, 21% were oxygen dependent and 40% received steroids. The in-patient/30-day mortality was similar between patients with and without COPD (2.9% vs 2.8%; P = .95). Patients with COPD had more frequent pulmonary complications (6.1% vs 2.4%; P = .07) and were more susceptible to be discharged on oxygen (10.7% vs 2%; P = .003). Patients with and without COPD did not have significant differences in intensive care unit length of stay (2 days [1-4]) or hospital length of stay (5 days [3-6] vs 4 days [3-6], respectively; P = .78; Table). The survival rates at 12, 36, and 60 months were lower for patients with COPD than for those without (87%, 73%, and 64% vs 92%, 78%, and 66%, respectively; P = .09; Fig). History of COPD or oxygen-dependent COPD was not an independent predictor of patient survival (P = .28). F-BEVAR is a safe and effective procedure for patients with COPD, even those with oxygen-dependent disease. Patients with COPD had a greater frequency of perioperative pulmonary complications and were more susceptible to be discharged on oxygen. However, their in-patient or 30-day mortality was not affected. Long-term patient survival was slightly reduced in patients with COPD, but COPD itself was not a predictor of long-term survival.TableResultsOutcomeOverall (n = 387)COPD (n = 180)Healthy (n = 207)P valuePulmonary complications12 (3.1)7 (3.8)5 (2.4).0730-Day mortality11 (2.8)5 (2.8)6 (2.8).95Hospital stay, days5 [3-6]5 [3-6]4 [3-6].78Discharge on oxygen23 (6)19 (10.6)4 (2).003COPD, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IQR, interquartile range. Data presented as median [IQR] or number (%). Open table in a new tab

Staging Endovascular Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repairs and the Risk of Post-operative Spinal Cord Ischemia

Staged aortic aneurysm repair is one method used to decrease the risk of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) following endovascular aortic intervention. Sequential sacrifice of arteries perfusing the spine may allow for improved spinal perfusion through the development of collateral networks over time. To evaluate the impact of staging endovascular aortic aneurysm repairs on SCI, we conducted a conservative analysis of Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data. De-identified VQI data were queried for cases of endovascular thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs from year 2014 to 2019. Cases were selected based on inclusion criteria: aneurysmal disease, no ruptures, no prior aortic surgeries, no retreatments, and only cases with complete data on aortic zones and SCI. Chi-square, Student's t-tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for univariable analyses, as appropriate. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of outcome. There were 116 staged aortic repairs (SARs) (8.2%) performed out of a total of 1421 endovascular aortic repairs that fit study criteria. The overall rate of SCI within the study cohort was 3.4% (n=48). The distribution of SARs and SCI events according to aortic zone coverage are displayed in Table1. Patients who underwent staged endovascular aortic repairs had higher rates of SCI, pre-op spinal drain placement, non-African-American race, COPD, smoking history, positive stress tests, aspirin and statin use, increased estimated blood loss, physician-modified endografts, number of aortic zones covered, lower pre-op hemoglobin levels, larger aneurysm sac size, fusiform aneurysms, and longer total procedure times, Table2. After adjusting for factors associated with SCI, a priori, and factors with a P<0.1 univariable analysis, SAR was not associated with SCI (odds ratio [OR]=1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.77-4.50, P=0.17). Of the six factors associated with SCI on univariable analysis, only procedure time ≥6hours (OR=2.49, 95% CI=1.09-5.70, P=0.031) and the number of aortic zones covered (OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.00-1.32, P=0.047) were predictive of SCI. Staged repairs had a lower proportion of permanent SCI (38%, 3 of 8 cases) compared with repairs that were not staged (68%, 27 of 40 cases), with a relative risk reduction of 44% for those who developed SCI, P=0.21. In a large national data set, SARs were performed for patients with more extensive aortic disease. SARs were only performed in about 8% of cases and the rate of SCI remained low. After adjusting for baseline comorbidities, extent of aortic disease, and other factors that may potentiate SCI, staged aortic aneurysm repair had a similar risk of SCI compared with non-staged repairs. However, there was a trend toward decreased permanent SCI risk in the SAR group.

Association of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein With Aneurysm Sac Shrinkage in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Purpose: The factors associated with aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) are not well established. As inflammation is implicated in aneurysm pathophysiology, we hypothesized that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was associated with aneurysm sac shrinkage after EVAR and compared the preoperative level of hsCRP between patients with and without postoperative aneurysm sac shrinkage after EVAR. Methods: From November 2013 to April 2019, 143 patients undergoing EVAR using Gore C3 Excluder (W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, Arizona) at our university hospital were included in this study. Aneurysm sac size was compared between that on baseline preoperative computed tomography (CT) and that on postoperative CT scans. A change in aneurysm sac size ≥5 mm was considered to be significant, whether due to enlargement or shrinkage. Results: Aneurysm sac size showed a significant decrease from 50.6 ± 9.8 mm to 47.1 ± 10.3 mm at 1 year. At 1 year postoperatively, aneurysm sac shrinkage (≥5 mm) was observed in 48 patients (34%), a stable aneurysm sac was noted in 93 patients (65%), and aneurysm sac enlargement was noted in 2 patients (1.4%). The mean preoperative hsCRP was 0.33 ± 0.54 mg/dL. Univariable analysis showed that preoperative hsCRP (p=0.029) and the presence of a renal cyst (p=0.002) were associated with aneurysm sac shrinkage. Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative hsCRP [>0.19mg/dL] (odds ratio [OR] = 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05–0.96; p=0.042), and the presence of a renal cyst (OR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.15–0.67; p=0.002) were independent risk factors for aneurysm sac shrinkage after EVAR. Conclusions: The level of preoperative hsCRP was independently associated with aneurysm sac shrinkage after EVAR in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. These data suggest that the high level of hsCRP can be a negative predictor for aneurysm sac shrinkage after EVAR.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Sac Expansion after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

PurposeThis study aimed to examine the sac changes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.MethodsMaterials and We examined the aneurysm sac size initially and regularly after surgery in 157 consecutive patients who underwent EVAR in 2009-2019. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were used as well as ultrasound images with non-enhanced CT scans in the patients with renal insufficiency. Sac expansion (SE) at 3 years was divided into two categories: progressive SE (PSE) defined as continuous sac enlargement of ≥5 mm on serial follow-up images at 1 and 3 years compared with the initial sac and delayed SE (DSE) defined as re-expansion of ≥5 mm compared with the regressed or stable sac at 1 year. The SE rate at 1 and 3 years and the risk factors for SE at 3 years were analyzed using logistic regression.ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 32.5 months, nine reinterventions in six patients were performed with open conversion (n=5) and endovascular repair (n=4). At 1 year, 112 patients underwent follow-up imaging. SE and sac regression were noted in 4 (3.6%) and 57 (50.9%) patients, respectively. Of the 64 patients with 3-year follow-up images, 16 (25%) exhibited SE (PSE [n=6] and DSE [n=10]). In the multivariable analysis, the risk factors for overall SE at 3 years were endoleaks at 1 year (P=0.006) and renal insufficiency (P=0.003).ConclusionDuring post-EVAR follow-up, patients with any endoleak at 1 year or renal insufficiency must be strictly monitored for SE development.

Surgical Findings and Outcomes of Endotension Following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Endotension is one of the detrimental complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and surgical management has been considered as standard of care. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the findings, and outcomes of such surgical intervention. The aim of this study was to investigate intraoperative findings and outcomes of surgical treatment for endotension after EVAR. Between January 2005 and October 2018, of the 708 patients who underwent EVAR for aneurysm aortic aneurysm; 12 patients (mean age of 76.1; range 66-88) who underwent open repair for endotension were retrospectively analyzed. The anatomical characteristics of the aorta and surgical findings were reviewed. The rates of early and late procedural complications, and overall mortality were evaluated. The median interval between the EVAR and surgical conversion was 45.9 months (range 17.1-46.9). Three of the twelve patients underwent emergency surgery due to aneurysm rupture. The median aneurysm sac size, the proximal neck diameter, and the proximal neck length before EVAR were 64 mm, 23.5 mm, and 30.5 mm, respectively, that changed before open repair to 93.5 mm (P = 0.02), 25 mm (P = 0.011), and 23 mm (P = 0.003), respectively. In four of the twelve patients, radiographically undetected endoleak was identified during surgery to be Type Ia, Ib, II, and III, respectively. The rates of early and late procedural complications, and overall mortality were 8.3%, 8.3% and 8.3%, respectively. Patients with endotension have a risk of delayed endoleak and aneurysm rupture; secondary intervention should be performed in such cases to prevent fatal complications. Surgical treatment appears to be a curative treatment for endotension with favorable outcomes. In addition, the possibility of an undetected endoleak should be considered as a potential cause of endotension.

Effect of vertebral compression fractures on aortic neck angulation after endovascular aneurysm repair

ObjectiveAortic neck angulation (ANA) prior to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and its changes after EVAR are considered important predictors of postoperative complications. We sought to assess the effects of vertebral body height loss on ANA in patients post-EVAR. MethodsAll patients who had undergone EVAR for infrarenal aortic aneurysms in our institution between August 2010 and December 2018 were assessed. Anterior and posterior vertebral body heights were measured in all patients on preoperative, early postoperative, and follow-up computed tomography scans (T12-L5 vertebral bodies). Patients who had significant height loss in their follow-up period were designated as the Study group. These were matched to a Control group of the same size using propensity-score matching based on age, gender, and duration between follow-up scans. Aortic neck morphology indices including ANA and its changes were measured, and information related to postoperative endoleaks and aneurysm sac size were extracted in the Study and Control groups. ResultsDuring the follow-up period, 10 of 185 patients had a radiologically significant vertebral body compression fracture. There was no significant difference between the Study (n = 10) and Control groups in age (77.6 ± 6.9 vs 77.2 ± 7.5 years; P = .64), gender (seven males and three females in each group; P = 1.0), duration between postoperative scans (1830 ± 665 vs 1800 ± 670 days; P = .25), preoperative ANA (36.0° ± 15.6° vs 42.4° ± 18.6°; P = .41), and early postoperative ANA (21.9° ± 11.7° vs 20.9° ± 16.3°; P = .72). Changes in ANA in the postoperative period (7.2° ± 11.1° vs −4.7° ± 6.7°; P = .009; power = .838) were significantly higher in the Study group. ConclusionsPost-EVAR vertebral body compression fractures exacerbate ANA. Awareness of this can guide both preoperative assessment and postoperative management and follow-up.

Ruptured pancreticoduodenal artery aneurysm with pancreatitis treated by endovascular treatment and endoscopic treatment

Pancreticoduodenal artery aneurysm (PDAA) is rare disease; a total of 63% of true PDAAs are associated with celiac trunk lesions. Although true PDAA is rare, nearly 50% of PDAA present with rupture. Since surgical treatments shows higher mortality and morbidities, endovascular treatment is now considered as an appropriate initial modality. We report a case of ruptured PDAA combined with pancreatitis treated by endovascular treatment and endoscopic treatment. A 50-year-old male with no significant medical history presented to our hospital with sudden onset of epigastric abdominal pain. There was no any kind of trauma. On admission, the patient's blood pressure was 50/40 mmHg with the pulse rate 107 bpm. Contrast enhanced CT after blood pressure stabilization showed hemoretroperitoneum due to ruptured PDAA. Emergency angiointervention was conducted immediately and embolization was successfully performed with NBCA. Although celiac artery stenosis (CAS) was observed at that time, it was about grade B and was not severe, so we decided to follow up. After endoscopic treatment for the observed infection and pancreatitis, the patient was discharged without significant complications. Although true PDAA is rare, nearly 50% of PDAA present with rupture. No treatment guideline has been established for the management of PDAA. Most authors agree that the size of aneurysmal sac is not a risk factor for rupture and should be treated immediately after discovery. There is no consensus about the necessity of active treatment of accompanying MALS, but a decision making whether to proceed or not depending on the degree of CAS will be needed.

Complicated embolisation of late endoleak via direct sac puncture: not all endoleaks are a type II endoleak

BackgroundEndoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) occur frequently with type 2 being the most common. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks is indicated if the aneurysmal sac increases in size.Case reportIn this case report, we will discuss a patient who presented with aneurysmal sac size increase 11 years after undergoing EVAR for an asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm which extended into the iliac arteries. Multi-phase CT demonstrated an endoleak with features commonly seen in type 2 endoleaks; pooling of contrast near a lumbar artery orifice on the angiographic phase which increases during the delayed phase. Both internal iliac arteries were sacrificed during the initial EVAR. Percutaneous direct sac puncture was therefor performed and angiogram during the procedure revealed no feeding or draining lumbar arteries. During attempts to embolize the perfused part of the aneurysmal sac non-target embolization into the main body of the graft occurred and the presence of type 3b endoleak was confirmed. The non-target embolization did not result in permanent sequelae.ConclusionsType 3b endoleaks are rare and can mimic type 2 endoleaks, which can cause serious complications if not identified properly. Rapid increase in aneurysmal sac size is uncommonly seen in type 2 endoleaks and if present needs to trigger further diagnostic investigations.

Outcomes of Preventive Embolization of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of preemptive inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) embolization on outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (EVAR). Materials and MethodsFrom January 2015 to July 2017, all patients undergoing elective EVAR or fenestrated EVAR (F-EVAR) for asymptomatic AAA in a single tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. Three groups of patients were defined: patients with a patent IMA who underwent embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 1), those with a patent IMA who did not undergo embolization during EVAR/F-EVAR (group 2), and those with a chronically occluded IMA (group 3). Preoperative aortic morphology, demographics, and procedural details were recorded. Aneurysmal growth (≥5 mm), reintervention, and overall mortality rates were analyzed using multivariate proportional hazard multivariate modeling. Propensity scores were constructed, and inverse probability weighting was applied to a new set of multivariate analyses to perform a sensitivity analysis. ResultsA total of 266 patients (male, 95% [n = 249]) with a median age of 70 (65–77) years were included, with F-EVAR procedures comprising 87 (32.7%) of the interventions. There were 52, 142, and 72 patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Changes in aneurysmal sac size did not differ between groups, nor did overall survival or reintervention rates at 24 months. IMA embolization was not identified as an independently protective factor for aneurysmal growth during follow-up (relative risk [RR] = 2.82/mm [0.96–8.28], P = .060), whereas accessory renal arteries (RR = 5.07/mm [1.72–14.96], P = .003) and a larger preoperative aneurysmal diameter (RR = 1.09/mm [1.03–1.15], P = .004) were independent risk factors for sac enlargement. ConclusionsPreventive embolization of the IMA during EVAR or F-EVAR did not promote aneurysmal sac shrinking or decrease the reintervention rate at 2-year follow-up.

Off the Shelf Fenestrated Stent Grafts: “Mind The Gap?”

Off the Shelf Fenestrated Stent Grafts: “Mind The Gap?”

Risk Factors for Early and Late Type Ib Endoleak Following Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

A type Ib endoleak (T1bEL) is a postoperative complication that usually requires additional interventions following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Previous studies have focused on iliac artery tortuosity or common iliac artery (CIA) diameter. However, we investigated the various risk factors for early and late T1bELs more comprehensively. This retrospective case-control study of a prospectively maintained database compared anatomical, demographic and technical factors between patients with early or late T1bELs and a control group. Early T1bEL was defined as a T1bEL occurring within 6months of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), while late T1bEL was defined as a T1bEL, initially identified more than 6months after EVAR. Anatomical values including neck diameter, length, and angle; maximum sac diameter and length; CIA length, diameter, and tortuosity; and distal sealing length were measured and included in the analysis. We performed uni- and multivariable analyses using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models. This study included 635 iliac limbs of 383 patients. Overall, T1bELs occurred in 22 iliac limbs during the follow-up period (22/635, 3.5%). Among them, the early and late T1bEL groups each included 11 limbs. The median follow-up duration of the 383 patients was 23 (8-58) months, and in the early T1bEL and early control groups, the durations were 15 (9-35) and 29 (15-60) months, respectively (P=0.01). The median overall follow-up durations in the late T1bEL and late control groups were 87 (76-102) and 62 (48-80) months, respectively (P=0.01). The median follow-up duration until the occurrence of late T1bEL was 44 (32-82) months, which was shorter than that of the late control group (P=0.03). No significant differences in sex, age, or brand of stent-graft were observed between the T1bEL and control groups. In the multivariable analysis, patients in the early T1bEL group had significantly more tortuous and short CIAs, and short distal sealing lengths (P=0.02, P=0.04, P=0.03, respectively), and the late T1bEL group had significantly larger maximum aortic aneurysm sac diameters, short CIAs and short distal sealing lengths (P<0.001, P=0.02, P=0.002, respectively). The suspected mechanisms of the T1bELs were CIA dilatation with or without sac expansion and aggravation of sac angulation. Except for one patient with aortic dissection, T1bELs were treated with iliac limb extensions. The various mechanisms of T1bELs differed depending on the time of onset from the procedure. An extensive sealing length may be protective against T1bEL, especially when the size of the aortic aneurysm sac is large or when the CIA has risky features, including large diameter or short length. Careful preoperative consideration of aortic aneurysm size and CIA length and tortuosity is essential, and patients with risky features should undergo strict postoperative surveillance.

Predictors of Aneurysm Sac Shrinkage Utilizing a Global Registry

Aneurysm sac remodeling is a complex multifactorial process with unknown factors influencing sac regression after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). We sought to identify factors associated with this process by analyzing data obtained from patients treated with the GORE EXCLUDER endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) endoprosthesis from December 2010 to October 2016 enrolled in the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT). All patients enrolled in GREAT with three years CT angiography (CTA) follow-up in each of the three successive years after EVAR were included. The percentage of sac size reduction toward device diameter was calculated and used as a surrogate for sac regression with the formula used being: sac size reduction = ((AAA baseline diameter - AAA diameter at follow-up)/(AAA baseline diameter - device diameter))∗100. The cohort was divided into two groups in accordance with the percentage of aneurysm sac reduction at three years; one with the top quartile of patients and the other with the lowest three quartiles. Demographic and procedural variables were analyzed using univariate and regression modeling to determine factors predictive of sac regression. There were 3265 subjects enrolled with follow-up as of May 2018 of which 526 (16.2%) had three years of CTA surveillance. Overall aneurysm sac size decreased from a mean of 58.0mm (Std Dev: 10.4, range: 34.2, 100.0) to a mean of 49.3mm (Std Dev: 14.1, range: 0, 140) for a percentage reduction toward device diameter of a mean 28.2% (Std Dev: 39.0, range: -103.7, 183.9). On multivariate logistic regression model; two factors proved to be statistically significant contributors to a larger percentage reduction in aneurysm sac: a conical neck (odds ratio [OR]=1.64, P-value=0.023) and a larger proximal device diameter (OR=1.09, P-value=0.023). On the other hand, two factors were negative predictors of sac shrinkage, namely: old age (OR=0.96, P-value=0.002) and larger baseline aneurysm sac diameter (OR=0.98, P-value=0.028). Aneurysms with conical necks and larger proximal device neck diameters have an increased percentage change in sac size over time after EVAR. Older age and larger initial diameters of aneurysms were negatively associated with percentage change in sac size as well as sac regression. Further study is needed to determine the clinical utility of these observations and applicability across multiple endoprosthesis platforms.

Surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients treated for expanding aneurysm sacs with type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair

ObjectivePersistent type II endoleaks (T2ELs) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with sac growth have been associated with adverse events, including rupture. Whereas intervention in the presence of aneurysm growth has become an accepted treatment paradigm for T2ELs, the efficacy and clinical success of such interventions remain unclear. Therefore, we examined the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing T2EL interventions after EVAR. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of all patients treated for expanding aneurysm sacs with T2ELs after EVAR at an academic medical center between 2006 and 2017. The primary outcomes assessed were need for repeated intervention; intervention types; and achievement of clinical success, defined as stable aneurysm sac size on computed tomography angiography after treatment. ResultsFifty-six patients underwent 119 interventions, of which 107 (90%) were technically successful. The median time from EVAR to index T2EL procedure was 37 months (interquartile range, 17-56 months), and the median follow-up time from first T2EL procedure was 27 months (interquartile range, 10-51 months). The most common index procedure was transarterial lumbar embolization (64%), followed by transarterial inferior mesenteric artery (20%), transcaval (14%), and translumbar embolization (1.8%). Thirty-three (59%) patients required further procedures for persistent aneurysm sac expansion. For subsequent T2EL interventions, the most common endovascular procedure was transarterial lumbar embolization (21%), followed by transcaval (21%), translumbar (11%), and transarterial inferior mesenteric artery embolization (8.6%). Twelve patients (21%) were found to have loss of proximal or distal seal on subsequent imaging and required graft extensions to stabilize aneurysm sac size. Ten patients (18%) ultimately underwent graft explantation or sacotomy with oversewing of the endoleak source. Freedom from any endoleak-related reintervention was 57% at 1 year and 36% at 3 years. Freedom from open treatment was 93% at 1 year and 82% at 3 years. Of the 44 patients with ≥6-month follow-up, 39 (89%) achieved clinical success. However, only 11 patients (25%) achieved clinical success without any further reintervention, and 29 patients (66%) achieved clinical success without open treatment. ConclusionsDespite high technical success, endoleak recurrence after T2EL treatment is common, and multiple interventions are often needed to stabilize aneurysm sac size in patients diagnosed with T2EL-associated sac growth. Notably, one in five patients treated for T2ELs was discovered, on further evaluation, to have proximal or distal seal zone loss that necessitated repair to achieve sac stability. Thus, thorough assessment of all endoleak types should be performed in patients with T2ELs associated with sac growth before T2EL treatment to ensure appropriate care and to minimize ineffective interventions.

Duplex ultrasound follow-up after fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR and BEVAR)

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is now the predominant method for treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Although EVAR has numerous advantages over standard open surgical repair, it also exposes patients to risks such as aneurysm sac enlargement, endoleaks, and graft migration, which make surveillance or follow-up mandatory. Fenestrated (FEVAR) and branched (BEVAR) endografts have extended the application of EVAR to juxtarenal, pararenal/paravisceral, and thoracoabdominal aneurysms, with some complex aneurysms requiring combined approaches (F-BEVAR). Duplex ultrasound has been recommended as an alternative to frequent computed tomography imaging for EVAR follow-up when it can provide the clinically necessary information. The major components of a post-EVAR duplex examination include measurement of aortic aneurysm sac size, assessment for endoleak, and evaluation of the endograft for patency and integrity. The duplex protocol for EVAR follow-up can be extended for follow-up after FEVAR, BEVAR, and F-BEVAR, with additional attention to the device components associated with fenestrations and branches. At the University of Washington, the physician-modified endovascular graft approach has been used for FEVAR. During these procedures, covered stents are placed in the renal arteries through fenestrations and the superior mesenteric artery is perfused through a fenestration, but typically remains unstented. Duplex scanning of the renal and mesenteric arteries has been performed preoperatively and at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and annually. In a review of patients having covered stents placed in non-stenotic renal arteries during FEVAR, both peak systolic velocity and the renal to aortic velocity ratio remained below the standard significant stenosis threshold in most patients. The duplex velocity criteria for stenosis in native renal arteries appeared to overestimate the severity of stenosis in renal artery covered stents. The unstented superior mesenteric artery remained widely patent in the presence of fenestrations or crossing struts and was not associated with endoleaks. Duplex ultrasound protocols for follow-up after FEVAR, BEVAR, and F-BEVAR can be based on those that have been established for standard EVAR, along with assessment of fenestrations and branches, as well as patency of the renal and mesenteric arteries.

Early and Late Outcomes of Ultrasound-Guided Direct Transabdominal Embolization of Isolated Type 2 Endoleaks after Endovascular Aortic Repair

The aim of this study is to report the early and late outcomes of ultrasound-guided direct transabdominal embolization (UGDTE) of isolated type 2 endoleak (T2EL) after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Forty-two consecutive T2EL patients were treated between February 2000 and September 2017 by UGDTE after previous EVAR. During the study period, UGDTE was the firs-line technique implemented for treatment of T2EL. All procedures were carried out using the same predefined technique. Aneurysm sac size change from the index treatment, freedom from recurrent endoleak after treatment, demographics, risk factors, and procedural factors were analyzed with univariate analysis. During the study interval, 612 patients underwent standard EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment and 111 (18.2%) developed an isolated T2EL. Of these, 42 (6.8%) consecutive patients were deemed suitable and treated with UDGT. Median imaging follow-up duration was 18.7months. Median fluoroscopic and procedure times were 7 and 58minutes, respectively. The rate of immediate technical success was 100%. Ten patients (23.8%) underwent reintervention for recurrent T2EL. Freedom from reintervention for T2EL at 1, 2, and 4years was 81%, 78%, and 71%. No aneurysm-related mortality occurred during the follow-up period. The use of UGDTE for treatment of isolated T2EL after EVAR is a safe and feasible technique when performed by experienced operators, resulting in high technical success and low complication rates in selected patients. Although being effective in obtaining T2EL exclusion, up to one-third of the patients may require repeat intervention duringlong-term follow-up. Therefore, lifelong surveillance after the procedure is recommended.