Aneurysm Repair In Patients Research Articles

Unraveling Marfan hearts: ultrastructural evidence for myocardial remodeling and cardiomyopathy

Abstract Background Despite improved life expectancy for patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS), significant morbidity and mortality persist. Although primarily attributed to aortic dissection and rupture, recent studies highlight the emerging role of arrhythmias and heart failure as additional contributors to morbidity and mortality in MFS. While severe valvular heart disease is an established cause of heart failure, there is a growing recognition of primary cardiomyopathy in patients with MFS. The mechanisms underlying cardiomyopathy in MFS remain poorly understood. Purpose This study aimed to reveal insights into the ultrastructural myocardial architecture in patients with MFS, thereby elucidating the role of cardiomyopathy in MFS. Methods This study enrolled 44 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at 2 centers (Marfan syndrome patients n=27 (MFS), ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair patients n=5 (non-MFS), patients post-orthotopic heart transplant n=12 (controls)). Myocardial biopsy samples were subjected to histopathological analysis using transmission electron microscopy and conventional histology. Results Conventional histological analysis revealed subtle abnormalities in the cardiomyocyte morphology of MFS patients, compared to non-MFS and controls. Overall, a slight increase in interstitial fibrosis and mild myocyte hypertrophy were observed in MFS patients. Ultrastructural examination of both MFS and non-MFS patients revealed significant structural remodeling and degenerative changes in the myocardium. These changes included: extensive myofibril lysis, compromised cell membrane integrity and nuclear chromatin condensation. Degenerative lesions were often accompanied by cytoplasmic debris, lysosomal residual bodies, autophagic vacuoles, and severe mitochondrial pathology. Dense accumulation of glycogen granules and lipofuscin was evident in areas of focal myofibril lysis. Notably, only MFS patients exhibited recruitment of granulocytes, including mast cells, eosinophils and neutrophils. A subset of MFS patients displayed advanced stages of myocardial degeneration. However, these changes did not correlate with clinical myocardial failure. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first evidence of ultrastructural changes in the myocardium of patients with MFS. Our data indicate various degenerative changes in the myocardial architecture, including structural and metabolic myocardial remodeling, along with inflammatory cell infiltration. We believe that our findings of ultrastructural lesions reflect the complexity of myocardial disease in MFS and emphasize the importance of careful surveillance for cardiomyopathy in MFS patients. Further studies are warranted to confirm whether the observed granulocyte influx is specific to MFS and to clarify its role in MFS myocardial disease pathophysiology.Graphical abstract

Real-world evaluation of CYP2C19 guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair.

Aim: To evaluate the feasibility and impact of using CYP2C19 genotype to guide selection of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm treatment with a flow diversion stent in a real-world clinical setting.Patients & methods: A single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in 112 patients undergoing intracranial aneurysm repair with flow-diversion stenting from 2014 to2021. Data were abstracted from health records. The frequency of clopidogrel or alternative therapy (ticagrelor or prasugrel) use was compared across CYP2C19 status (intermediate or poor metabolizer [IM/PM] vs. normal, rapid, or ultrarapid metabolizer [NM/RM/UM]).Results: In the study population, CYP2C19 genotype testing was performed on 110 (98.2%) patients; of these, 106 (97.2%) had results available prior to the stent procedure and 28 (25.5%) were IM/PMs. Alternative therapy was used more frequently in IM/PMs compared with NM/RM/UMs (57.1 vs. 8.5%, respectively, p<0.0001). The frequency of thromboembolic events over 12months did not significantly differ across clopidogrel-treated IM/PMs, clopidogrel-treated NM/RM/UMs and patients on alternative therapy (p=0.352); although, event numbers were low.Conclusion: A pre-emptive CYP2C19 genotyping strategy to guide antiplatelet therapy selection in intracranial aneurysm repair patients is feasible in a real-world clinical setting. Larger studies are needed to assess the impact on clinical outcomes.

Increased Mortality After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients With Enlarged Aortic Necks

Increased Mortality After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients With Enlarged Aortic Necks

Intravascular Iliac Artery Lithotripsy to Facilitate Aortic Endograft Delivery: Midterm Results of a Dual-Center Experience.

To assess the feasibility and safety of intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for enabling transfemoral abdominal (EVAR), thoracic (TEVAR), and thoracoabdominal (BEVAR) endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with narrow and calcified iliac arteries. Consecutive patients treated with IVL for severe calcified and narrowed iliac access before EVAR, TEVAR, or BEVAR between November 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. All anatomical iliac characteristics were acquired by multi-planar reconstruction of preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). The hostility of the vascular accesses was classified based on Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) and calcified access severity score (CASS), a new score considering both anatomical (calcium grade and length, minimum lumen diameter [MLD], and tortuosity index) and aortic stent-graft (SG/MLD index) parameters. Primary endpoint was technical success defined as successful aortic endograft delivery and deployment without iliac rupture. Freedom from complications and primary patency were additionally analyzed. Twenty-eight iliac axes were treated with IVL (8 bilateral) in 20 patients (mean age 74.5±6.7 years) with a mean follow-up of 26.5±6.2 (range 17-36) months. Ten patients underwent EVAR: 3 TEVAR, and 7 BEVAR procedures. In 14 patients (70%), aneurysm disease was associated with symptomatic aorto-iliac occlusive disease (AIOD), with Rutherford class III to IV. The PACSS was grade IV in 89% of the cases and the CASS (mean 14±2) was grade III to IV in all cases. The stent-graft (SG) outer diameter (5.60±1.65 mm) was significantly larger by 50% than MLD (3.96±1.20 mm), with an SG/MLD index of 1.50±0.51 (p<0.001). Technical success was 100%. No dissection, rupture, or distal embolization occurred. One (3.4%) bail-out stenting was necessary as endoconduit after IVL treatment. One month CTA showed that postoperative luminal gain increased by 93% (p<0.001). An improvement of 2 Rutherford classes occurred in all AIOD patients with a primary patency of 100% at last follow-up. This study shows the safety and feasibility of IVL as a valuable option to treat narrow and calcified iliac arteries to facilitate endograft delivery. Further studies will be useful to confirm these results. In this article, the use of intravascular iliac artery lithotripsy to facilitate aortic endograft delivery is explored. The presence of iliac severe calcifications still represents a contraindication for aortic endovascular repair. Intravascular lithotripsy increases the feasibility and safety of endovascular aortic procedures, facilitating endograft delivery and reducing the risk of iliac rupture and/or dissections by improving vessel compliance and luminal gain. This novel vessel preparation could be an alternative to "paving and cracking" and/or iliac conduits. This study describes a new score to classify the severity of iliac calcifications, considering anatomical parameters and the profile of aortic endografts delivery system.

Up and over staged endoconduit technique for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair

Adverse iliofemoral anatomy can preclude complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. This study aims to describe the “up-and-over” staged endoconduit technique to improve access and avoid vascular injury before complex endovascular aneurysm repair. A staged procedure for complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair is performed using an endoconduit (W.L. Gore & Associates). After obtaining contralateral femoral access, the extension of iliofemoral disease is assessed using angiography. The endoconduit is advanced “up and over” the aortic bifurcation and delivered percutaneously into the common femoral artery to treat a diseased access site and maintain intact the ipsilateral femoral access for future stent graft deployment. Internal iliac artery patency is maintained when feasible. During complex aneurysm repair, the endoconduit is accessed directly under ultrasound guidance using sequential dilation to avoid vascular injury. PerClose sutures (Abbott Vascular) are used to close the endoconduit femoral access site. This study found that staged “up and over” endoconduit creation is a useful technique before complex endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with adverse iliofemoral anatomy. Avoiding accessing the main femoral access site during the first stage prevents vascular or access site injuries and allows for both iliac and femoral disease to be addressed.

Targeted proteomics and metabolomics for biomarker discovery in abdominal aortic aneurysm and post-EVAR sac volume

Background and aimsAbdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients undergo uniform surveillance programs both leading up to, and following surgery. Circulating biomarkers could play a pivotal role in individualizing surveillance. We applied a multi-omics approach to identify relevant biomarkers and gain pathophysiological insights. Materials and methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 108 AAA patients and 200 post-endovascular aneurysm repair (post-EVAR) patients were separately investigated. We performed partial least squares regression and ingenuity pathway analysis on circulating concentrations of 96 proteins (92 Olink Cardiovascular-III panel, 4 ELISA-assays) and 199 metabolites (measured by LC-TQMS), and their associations with CT-based AAA/sac volume. ResultsThe median (25th-75th percentile) maximal diameter was 50.0 mm (46.0, 53.0) in the AAA group, and 55.4 mm (45.0, 64.2) in the post-EVAR group. Correcting for clinical characteristics in AAA patients, the aneurysm volume Z-score differed 0.068 (95 %CI: (0.042, 0.093)), 0.066 (0.047, 0.085) and −0.051 (-0.064, -0.038) per Z-score valine, leucine and uPA, respectively. After correcting for clinical characteristics and orthogonalization in the post-EVAR group, the sac volume Z-score differed 0.049 (0.034, 0.063) per Z-score TIMP-4, −0.050 (-0.064, -0.037) per Z-score LDL-receptor, −0.051 (-0.062, -0.040) per Z-score 1-OG/2-OG and −0.056 (-0.066, -0.045) per Z-score 1-LG/2-LG. ConclusionsThe branched-chain amino acids and uPA were related to AAA volume. For post-EVAR patients, LDL-receptor, monoacylglycerols and TIMP-4 are potential biomarkers for sac volume. Additionally, distinct markers for sac change were identified.

Use of EndoAnchors during index endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy.

Standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is sometimes the only treatment option for patients with hostile aortic neck anatomy, but it carries an increased risk of both early and late procedure-related complications. The aim of this study was to report on single-center experience with the Heli-FX EndoAnchors (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) as an adjunctive procedure to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for prevention and perioperative treatment of proximal neck complications in patients with hostile neck anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Asingle-centre, retrospective study evaluating 24 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors during the index EVAR procedure between November 2018 and August 2021. EndoAnchor implantation was indicated for cases with hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy characterised by the presence of at least one of the following parameters: length of 28 mm, angle of >60°, circumferential thrombus/calcification involving ≥50%, and reverse taper. Median follow-up period was 22.5 months (IQR 2-31.5 months) with no aneurysm-related death, rupture, or conversion to open surgical repair during the follow-up. The procedural success rate was 100%, with no type Ia endoleak at the completion angiography. Amean of 7 EndoAnchors was used per patient (range 4-12). There were no EndoAnchor fractures and dislocations or stent graft fabric damage due to anchor implants.Twenty-three patients (95.8%) remained free of type Ia endoleak and migration on follow-up imaging. Aneurysm sac regression was observed in 13 patients (54.1%), while in 8 patients (33.3%) the sac remained stable. Sac enlargement was present in 1 patient (4.2%) due to late type Ia endoleak. Twopatients were lost to the follow-up immediately after the procedure.Between two groups of patients (sac regression versus failure to regress), the larger initial diameter of the proximal neck was the only significant independent factor associated with a lower possibility of sac regression (p= 0,021). The use of EndoAnchors during the index EVAR procedure in cases with challenging aortic neck anatomy with or without perioperative type Ia endoleak was associated with good midterm results and led to sac regression in most of the patients (Tab. 4, Fig. 3, Ref. 31).

Long-Term Outcomes of Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients Aged ≤70 Years.

Objectives: The efficacy of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) against abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in younger patients remains unknown. Hence, the current study aimed to investigate whether the aneurysm-related mortality rate of EVAR is acceptable among patients aged ≤70 years. Methods: Among 644 patients, 148 underwent EVAR (EVAR group), and 496 received open surgical repair (OSR group). The cumulative incidence rates of aneurysm-related death, any intervention, and serious aneurysm-related events after AAA repair were evaluated using the cumulative incidence function in the presence of competing risks. Results: The EVAR group had higher prevalences of several comorbidities, and overall survival for the EVAR group was significantly inferior to that of the OSR group. The cumulative incidence rates of aneurysm-related death, any intervention, and serious aneurysm-related events at 5 years were 1.5%, 11.7%, and 6.4% in the EVAR group and 1.3%, 5.3%, and 5.9% in the OSR group, respectively. EVAR was not a significant prognostic factor of aneurysm-related mortality and serious aneurysm-related events. However, it was an independent poor prognostic factor of any intervention. Conclusion: EVAR was not a significant prognostic factor of aneurysm-related mortality and serious aneurysm-related events. Therefore, it demonstrated acceptable procedure-related long-term outcomes, at least in high-risk young patients.

Quality Assessment of Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Patient Information on the Internet Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool

This study aimed to assess the quality of patient information material regarding elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair on the internet using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (MEQIP) tool. A qualitative assessment of internet based patient information was performed. The 12 most used search terms relating to AAA repair were identified using Google Trends, with the first 10 pages of websites retrieved for each term searched. Duplicates were removed, and information for patients undergoing elective AAA were selected. Further exclusion criteria were marketing material, academic journals, videos, and non-English language sites. The remaining websites were then MEQIP scored independently by two reviewers, producing a final score by consensus. A total of 1 297 websites were identified, with 235 (18.1%) eligible for analysis. The median MEQIP score was 18 (interquartile range [IQR] 14, 21) out of a possible 36. The highest score was 33. The 99th percentile MEQIP scoring websites scored > 27, with four of these six sites representing online copies of hospital patient information leaflets, however hospital sites overall had lower median MEQIP scores than most other institution types. MEQIP subdomain median scores were: content, 8 (IQR 6, 11); identification, 3 (IQR 1, 3); and structure, 7 (IQR 6, 9). Of the analysed websites, 77.9% originated from the USA (median score 17) and 12.8% originated in the UK (median score 22). Search engine ranking was related to website institution type but had no correlation with MEQIP. When assessed by the MEQIP tool, most websites regarding elective AAA repair are of questionable quality. This is in keeping with studies in other surgical and medical fields. Search engine ranking is not a reliable measure of quality of patient information material regarding elective AAA repair. Health practitioners should be aware of this issue as well as the whereabouts of high quality material to which patients can be directed.

Changes of vascular stiffness and central blood pressure after endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with hypertension. Results of one-year follow-up

Aim. To assess the changes of arterial stiffness, central blood pressure (CBP), and determine the factors potentially influencing them in patients with descending thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysm, in combination with hypertension, one year after endovascular aneurysm repair ((T)EVAR).Material and methods. Patients ≥18 years of age without clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias were included. Before surgery and a year later, we determined peripheral blood pressure, heart rate (HR), CBP, augmentation index (AIx), pressure at the point of maximum rise of the direct pulse wave (PT1h), time to return of the reflected pressure wave (Tr) and carotid femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV).Results. Fifty patients were included (mean age, 68±9 years; 41 men; 16 with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, 34 with abdominal aortic aneurysm), 23 patients were reexamined. After (T)EVAR, an increase in cfPWV (+2,6 m/s, p&lt;0,001), PT1h (+5 mm Hg, p=0,026), peripheral pulse pressure (+7 mm Hg, p=0,039), heart rate (+5 beats/min, p=0,025). The CBP and AIx values have not changed. The dependence of Tr decrease on the stent-graft length (β=0,42) and the decrease in heart rate (β=-0,52) was found. During the year, 6 cardiovascular events were registered.Conclusion. Graft implantation is accompanied by an increase in cfPWV, regardless of aneurysm location. An increase in PT1h one year after (T)EVAR may reflect a decrease in aortic distensibility and worsening damping function. No changes of CBP and AIx is probably explained by reflected wave characteristics after surgery. Predictors of Tr are — increase in heart rate and implantation of longer stent grafts.

Five-year outcomes of endosuture aneurysm repair in patients with short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm from the ANCHOR registry: Presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Southern Association of Vascular Surgery, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, January 18-21, 2023.

Five-year outcomes of endosuture aneurysm repair in patients with short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm from the ANCHOR registry: Presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Southern Association of Vascular Surgery, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, January 18-21, 2023.

Abstract 14618: Comparative Outcomes of Elective Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients With Preoperative Cardiac Stress Testing

Introduction: The use of cardiac stress testing (CST) before endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) repair is controversial. While prior research has explored the utility of CST before EVAR, EVAR outcomes in patients with different CST results have not been studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate EVAR outcomes in patients with abnormal CST. Hypothesis: Patients with abnormal CST before EVAR have inferior outcomes compared to patients with normal CST. Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database for EVAR was reviewed. Patients who underwent CST prior to elective EVAR were included. In VQI, abnormal CST is defined as having ischemia, infarction, or both ischemia and infarction (BII). Outcomes of patients with normal and abnormal CST were compared, including a subgroup analysis of CST abnormalities. Results: A total of 19,964 patients were included and 23.7% (4,723) had abnormal CST. Patients with abnormal CST were more commonly males with comorbidities. Patients with abnormal CST had significantly more perioperative complications including MACE and one-year mortality compared to patients with normal CST. ( Table ) Regression analysis revealed that abnormal CST was independently associated with increased perioperative MACE (OR=1.59 [1.28-1.97]) and one-year mortality (HR=1.11 [1.00-1.23]). Subgroup analysis of patients with abnormal CST showed that patients with BII had significantly more perioperative MACE (6.8% vs 4.1%, P =0.002) and mortality (1.1% vs 0.4%, P =0.040) compared to patients with either ischemia or infarction. BII was independently associated with MACE (OR=1.62 [1.06-2.41]) and 30-day mortality (OR=3.28 [1.21-8.16]) compared to either abnormality. Conclusions: Patients with abnormal CST have worse outcomes after elective EVAR compared to patients with normal CST, particularly patients with BII. CST is a useful tool for perioperative and long-term risk stratification in patients undergoing elective EVAR.

Outcomes of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair in patients with a previous myocardial infarction

ObjectiveMany patients undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair have had a previous myocardial infarction (MI). To address the paucity of data regarding outcomes in such patients, we aimed to compare outcomes after open TAAA repair in patients with and without previous MI. MethodsFrom 1986 to 2022, we performed 3737 consecutive open TAAA repairs. Of these, 706 (18.9%) were in patients with previous MI. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of operative death. Propensity score matching analyzed preoperative and select operative variables to create matched groups of patients with or without a previous MI (n = 704 pairs). Late survival was determined by Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared by log rank test. ResultsOverall, operative mortality was 8.5% and the adverse event rate was 15.2%; these were elevated in patients with MI (11.0% vs 7.9% [P = .01] and 18.0% vs 14.6% [P = .02], respectively). In the propensity score–matching cohort, the MI group had a greater rate of cardiac complications (32.4% vs 25.4%; P = .005) and delayed paraparesis (5.1% vs 2.4%; P = .1); however, there was no difference in operative mortality (11.1% vs 10.9%; P = 1) or adverse event rate (18.0% vs 16.8%; P = .6). Overall, previous MI was not independently associated with operative mortality in multivariable analysis (P = .1). The matched MI group trended toward poorer 10-year survival (29.8% ± 1.9% non-MI vs 25.0% ± 1.8% MI; P = .051). ConclusionsAlthough previous MI was not associated with early mortality after TAAA repair, patients with a previous MI had greater rates of cardiac complications and delayed paraparesis. Patients with a previous MI also trended toward poorer survival.

Transvenous Access for Emergent Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients Without Femoral Access.

To describe the technique of transvenous access for emergent endovascular repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms exemplified with 2 cases. Transvenous access to the aorta is described as an alternative access method to deliver aortic endografts in emergency situations. A 68-year-old female patient with severely compromised iliac and subclavian artery access was treated for a ruptured extent V thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm with a t-Branch (Cook Medical, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) delivered through a transcaval access. To avoid severe aortocaval shunting a balloon-expandable covered stent was deployed through a carotid access due to severe bilateral subclavian ostial stenosis. A 71-year-old man with an acute type B aortic dissection and bilateral narrow long-segment stenting of the iliac arteries was treated with a physician-modified thoracic endovascular aortic repair using an arteriovenous fenestration created at the level of the common iliac artery. We describe the access creation by fenestration using a transseptal needle. Transvenous access for thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is safe and feasible in selected emergent cases. A transvenous approach may be helpful in selected patients when an endovascular repair needs to be performed but no arterial femoral access is available. This approach proved to be feasible even with large-bore introducer sheaths, taking its place in the armamentarium of the vascular surgeon for emergent complex endovascular aortic repairs.

Open, closed or a bit of both: a systematic review and meta-analysis of staged thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Staged procedures are one strategy found to be beneficial for medium- to high-risk Crawford extent I-III thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair patients and may be performed through a variety of techniques. This review sought to compare the primary outcomes of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and long-term mortality between three cohorts grouped by approach: open, endovascular, and hybrid. In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a total of 919 references were extracted from a search of three online databases (Embase, PubMed, Scopus). Following application of inclusion/exclusion criteria and data extraction, quantitative meta-analysis was undertaken utilizing a random effects model. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were digitized and aggregated to graph estimated survival. A total of 20 studies representing 924 patients were included. SCI was highest in the endovascular group, at 9.8% of weighted means, followed by hybrid, and open groups at 3.2% and 1.4%, respectively. However, 30-day mortality was highest in the open group at 6.0%, followed by the hybrid group at 3.8%, and endovascular at 3.6%. Aggregated long-term survival estimations are shown graphically, extending to 5 years for open and endovascular cohorts, and 3 years for the smaller hybrid cohort. While all cases incorporated spinal drainage, monitoring and staging for spinal protection, there is innate difference in approach when examining for cord ischemia. This systematic review and meta-analysis of staged TAAA repair describes the first comparison between cohorts of open and endovascular approach, revealing the increased risk of SCI and long-term mortality in endovascular repair.

Five-year outcomes of endosuture aneurysm repair in patients with short neck abdominal aortic aneurysm from the ANCHOR registry

ObjectiveHostile aortic neck anatomies such as proximal short necks are known to put patients at an increased risk for type IA endoleaks, migration, and need for reinterventions. The Heli-FX EndoAnchor System was designed to improve seal of aortic stent grafts. Endosuture aneurysm repair (ESAR) using EndoAnchors with the Endurant stent graft has been shown to be safe and effective for the treatment of patients with short necks through one year. This study reports the 5-year patient outcomes of the Aneurysm Treatment using the Heli-FX EndoAnchor System Global Registry (ANCHOR) short neck regulatory cohort. MethodsThe 70 patients from the ANCHOR Registry were cohort submitted to regulators for approval of the Endurant short neck indication. Patients had an infrarenal neck length of ≥ 4 mm and <10 mm. At 5 years, this short neck cohort had clinical and imaging follow-up compliance rates of 85% (28/33) and 70% (23/33), respectively. ResultsThe short neck cohort had a mean age of 71.3±8.1 years and was 27.1% (19/70) female. Kaplan Meier freedom from all-cause mortality was 68.5 ± 6.2%, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality was 90.1 ± 4.5%, freedom from any endovascular or surgical secondary procedure was 76.9 ± 7.2%, and freedom from rupture was 95.6 ± 3.2%. Eight patients had a total of nine type IA endoleaks detected through 5 years, of which three resolved spontaneously by the next follow-up visit. There were two patients with renal complications who did not undergo reintervention and there were no device migrations reported through 5 years. After 5 years, 68.2% of patients (15/22) had sac regression, 13.6% (3/22) had stable sacs, and 18.2% (4/22) had increased sac diameter as compared with their 1-month measurements. ConclusionsAfter ESAR treatment using Heli-FX EndoAnchors with Endurant, the 5-year outcomes of the short neck cohort from the ANCHOR registry had encouraging results with regards to proximal neck-related complications, secondary procedures, and sac regression. This review of ESAR in patients with short proximal necks showed positive outcomes through 5 years although follow-up of a larger cohort is necessary.

Side-by-side deployment of gore excluder legs at a narrow terminal aorta for endovascular aneurysm repair.

A narrow terminal aorta is a risk factor for endograft occlusion after endovascular aneurysm repair. To minimize limb complications, we used Gore Excluder legs positioned side-by-side at the terminal aorta. We investigated the outcomes of our strategy for endovascular aneurysm repair in patients with a narrow terminal aorta. We enrolled 61 patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with a narrow terminal aorta (defined as < 18mm in diameter) from April 2013 to October 2021. The standard procedure involves complete treatment with the Gore Excluder device. When other types of main body endografts were used, they were deployed proximal to the terminal aorta, and we used the Gore Excluder leg device in the bilateral limbs. Postoperatively, the intraluminal diameter of the legs at the terminal aorta was measured to assess the configuration. During the follow-up period (mean: 2.7 ± 2.0years), there were no aorta-related deaths, endograft occlusions, or leg-related re-interventions. There were no significant differences between the pre- and postoperative ankle-brachial pressure index values in the dominant and non-dominant legs (p = 0.44 and p = 0.17, respectively). Postoperatively, the mean difference rate (defined as [dominant leg diameter-non-dominant leg diameter]/terminal aorta diameter) was 7.5 ± 7.1%. The difference rate was not significantly correlated with the terminal aortic diameter, calcification thickness, or circumferential calcification (r = 0.16, p = 0.22; r = 0.07, p = 0.59; and r = -0.07, p = 0.61, respectively). Side-by-side deployment of Gore Excluder legs produces acceptable outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair with a narrow terminal aorta. The endograft expansion at the terminal aorta is tolerable without influencing calcification distribution.

Management of Retroperitoneal Fibrosis with Endovascular Aneurysm Repair in Patients Refractory to Medical Management

Early diagnosis and treatment of under-recognized retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) are essential before reaching the poorly responsive fibrotic stage. Although most patients respond to medical therapy, relapses are common. Open surgery in medically resistant patients is associated with major adverse clinical events. Therefore, we aim to compare the outcomes of endovascular repair in patients with RPF who were refractory to the optimal medical management. This is a single-center longitudinal study of optimal medical therapy (OMT) vs endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with RPF to our tertiary referral vascular center. Seventeen patients were referred to us with peri-aortic RPF over the study period. Eleven received OMT only, whereas six underwent EVAR after the failure of OMT. Eighty-two percent (n = 14) were male, and the mean follow-up was 74.40 ± 58.40 months. Nine (52%) had immunoglobulin G4-related disease (4 OMT vs 5 EVAR). EVAR patients had 100% technical success without perioperative mortality. Furthermore, all the EVAR patients were symptom-free following the intervention. Pre-operative aortic RPF index (maximum peri-aortic soft tissue diameter/maximum aortic diameter) was higher in the EVAR than in the OMT group. However, there was a significant decrement in the aortic RPF index following EVAR (P = .04). EVAR in RPF medical-resistant patients is a valuable option in the armamentarium of nephrologists and rheumatologists. Our study shows that an endovascular intervention provides a promising outcome in RPF/IgG4-RD periaortitis, which is refractory to medical therapy. We recommend further studies to investigate and establish the long-term effectiveness of endovascular repair in RPF.

Outcomes of concomitant myectomy and left ventricular apical aneurysm repair in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

ObjectivesHypertrophic cardiomyopathy with left ventricular apical aneurysm is a phenotype associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk for sudden cardiac death. In this study, we describe the surgical outcome of concomitant apical aneurysm repair in patients undergoing transapical myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. MethodsWe identified 67 patients with left ventricular apical aneurysms who underwent transapical myectomy and apical aneurysm repair between July 2000 and August 2020. Long-term survival was compared with that of 2746 consecutive patients undergoing transaortic septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with subaortic obstruction. ResultsTransapical myectomy was indicated for midventricular obstruction (n = 44) or left ventricular remodeling for diastolic heart failure (n = 29). Preoperatively, 74.6% (n = 50) of patients were in New York Heart Association class III/IV heart failure, and 34.3% (n = 23) of patients had experienced syncope or presyncope. Atrial fibrillation was documented in 22 patients (32.8%), and episodes of ventricular arrhythmias were recorded in 30 patients (44.8%). Thrombus was present in the apical aneurysm in 6 patients. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 4.9 (1.8-7.6) years, the estimated 1- and 5-year survivals were 98.5% and 94.5%, respectively, which were not significantly different from that of patients undergoing transaortic septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (P = .52) or an age- and sex-matched US general population (P = .40). ConclusionsApical aneurysm repair in conjunction with septal myectomy is a safe procedure, and the good long-term survival of patients suggests that the procedure may reduce cardiac-related death in this high-risk hypertrophic cardiomyopathy population.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Patients with Concomitant Cancer: A Literature Review.

Abdominal aortic aneurysmal (AAA) repair in patients with concomitant cancer is controversial due to increased comorbidity and reduced life expectancy in this specific patient group. This literature review aims to investigate the evidence supporting one treatment modality over another (endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) or open repair (OR)), as well as treatment strategy (staged AAA-, cancer first or simultaneous procedures) in patients with AAA and concomitant cancer. Literature review, including studies published from 2000 to 2021 on surgical treatment in patients with AAA and concomitant cancer and related outcomes (30-day morbidity/complications as well as 30-day and 3-year mortality). 24 studies comprising 560 patients undergoing surgical treatment of AAA and concomitant cancer were included. Of these, 220 cases were treated with EVAR and 340 with OR. Simultaneous procedures were performed in 190 cases, 370 received staged procedures. The 30-day mortality for EVAR versus OR was 1% and 8%, corresponding to a relative risk (RR) of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.03-0.46, p = 0.002). No difference in mortality was observed between staged versus simultaneous procedure nor between AAA-first versus cancer-first strategy, RR 0.59 (95% CI: 0.29-1.1, p = 0.13) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.34-2.31, p = 0.80), respectively. Overall, 3-year mortality was 21% for EVAR and 39% for OR from 2000-2021, while the mortality up to 3 years after EVAR within recent years (2015-2021) was 16%. This review supports EVAR treatment as first choice if suitable. No consensus was established on treating either the aneurysm or the cancer first or simultaneously. Long-term mortality after EVAR was comparable to non-cancer patients within recent years.