Prostate cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among men worldwide. Despite the significant research into its therapeutics, the current treatments remain expensive with side effects. Hence, there is a significant need for new therapeutic solutions. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the potential of bioactive compounds from Camellia sinensis as inhibitors of the androgen receptor (AR) and Cytochrome P450 17A1 (CYP17A1), offering a novel approach for prostate cancer treatment. The bioactive compounds from C. sinensis were obtained from Dr. Duke's Phytochemical and Ethnobotanical Database (DPED). The target proteins were obtained from Protein Data Bank (PDB) and prepared using Biovia Discovery Studio 2021. Active sites of the target proteins were identified using the Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of Proteins 3.0 (CASTp 3.0) database, and molecular docking analysis were conducted using the Autodock Vina plugin on PyRx software. Druglikeness and ADMET prediction were assessed using SwissAdme, admetSAR2.0, and Protox II, while molecular dynamics simulation and Molecular Mechanics-Generalized Born Surface Area analysis were performed using the Schrodinger LLC Desmond/Prime program. Out of the 117 phytocompounds retrieved, 25 phytocompounds were non-carcinogenic and positive for AR binding, while more than half showed non-promiscuity in inhibiting cytochrome variants. All 25 compounds exhibited lower binding affinity against AR and CYP17A1 compared to the controls. Specifically, Theaflavine-3,3′-digallate, Epitheaflagallin 3-O-gallate, and Gallocatechin gallate formed the best complexes with AR, while Thearubgin, Theasinensin B, and Theaflavin monogallates exhibited the most favorable interactions with CYP17A1. Additionally, these compounds showed remarkable druggability qualities. Molecular dynamics simulation validated that Gallocatechin gallate, Epitheaflagallin 3-O-gallate formed excellent stability with AR while Thearugbin and Theaflavin monogallates also exhibited commendable stability with CYP17A1 protein. Thus, the bioactives are recommended for further studies to test efficacy and toxicity.
Read full abstract