Androgen Receptor Transactivation Research Articles

Abstract 1030: IX2X2

Abstract Introduction: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in men. More than 85% of PCa and advanced aggressive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) depend on the androgen receptor (AR) for growth. AR-targeted therapeutics are the mainstay treatment option for PCa. Majority of PCa and CRPC respond to AR-LBD-binding antagonists such as enzalutamide and become refractory after a brief period of response. One of the main resistance mechanisms is the expression of AR splice variants (AR-SVs). AR-SVs lack LBD and are constitutively active, causing aggressive phenotype. Description: Rationale-based drug design was employed to synthesize selective AR irreversible covalent antagonists (SARICA). SARICAs were evaluated in AR transactivation to determine the antagonistic activity. SARICAs were incubated with purified recombinant AR activation function-1 (AF-1) protein and mass spectrometry was performed to determine their covalent binding. SARICAs were evaluated in AR-SV transactivation assay and in a Schild’s plot to determine the nature of inhibition (reversible Vs irreversible). SARICAs were tested in PCa cell line gene expression and proliferation assays and in tumor xenograft experiments. Summary: SARICAs inhibited AR transactivation in submicromolar range. Mass spectrometry with purified AF-1 protein demonstrated covalent binding of SARICAs and identified C406 and C327 as SARICA-interacting nucleophiles. Both amino acids are important for AR-V7 function and stability, making them appropriate drug targets. SARICAs inhibited the activity of AR-V7 and irreversibly inhibited AR transactivation, indicating that these covalent binders are irreversible antagonists. SARICAs selectively inhibit the proliferation and growth of AR-positive prostate cancer cells and tumors, but not AR-negative cells and tumors. Conclusion: These first-in-class AR-selective covalent molecules thus serve as chemical probes to advance our understanding of the AR-AF-1 and they potentially offer an opportunity to treat refractory cancers. Disclosure: This work was supported by an NCI grant (CA229164 and CA229164S1), a DOD grant (W81XWH2110055), and by Muirhead endowment. The SARICAs are licensed to Oncternal therapeutics, San Diego, CA. RN is a consultant to Oncternal therapeutics. Citation Format: Thamarai U. Ponnusamy, Thirumagal T. Thiyagarajan, Ramesh Narayanan. IX2X2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1030.

The effect of PARP inhibition on androgen receptor localization and activity in castration resistant prostate cancer.

e17037 Background: The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) olaparib and rucaparib have been approved for the treatment of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the setting of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). Additionally, PARPi have been shown to modulate androgen receptor (AR) signaling, with a recent report demonstrating mono-ADP-ribosylation of cysteine residues in AR by Parp7. Here, we further evaluated the effect of PARPi on AR activity and localization. Methods: The effect of PARPi on cell growth and survival of CRPC cell lines was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. AR ribosylation was assessed in CRPC cell lines by immunoprecipitation (IP) assays and proximity ligation assays (PLA). The subcellular localization of AR was determined by quantitative immunofluorescence microscopy in CRPC cell lines and xenograft models. Changes in AR activity with PARPi treatment were evaluated by a luciferase reporter assay and AR target gene expression in a PDX model. Finally, PARPi mediated alteration in the AR protein interactome was evaluated by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) proteomics. Results: The PARPi olaparib and talazoparib, and to a lesser extent veliparib, inhibited CRPC cell growth. Evidence of AR ribosylation was seen by IP and PLA. PARPi treatment of multiple in vitro and in vivo prostate cancer models resulted in a shift of AR subcellular localization, from predominantly nuclear to cytoplasmic compartments. In luciferase reporter assays, AR transactivation activity was decreased after PARPi treatment in a dose dependent manner. In vivo, in prostate cancer xenograft models, decreased AR target gene expression was seen upon PARPi treatment. LC-MS/MS proteomic studies revealed that PARP inhibition resulted in significant changes in the composition of AR interaction partners, in particular of proteins related to intracellular trafficking and nuclear transport. This suggests a potential link between altered AR complex assembly and the observed changes in AR subcellular localization in the context of PARPi treatment. Conclusions: We describe a novel sequela of PARPi therapy to alter AR localization and activity in CRPC. Single agent PARP inhibition can alter prostate cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. With PARPi treatment, AR localization is shifted to the cytoplasm, the AR interactome is altered, and AR transcriptional activity decreased. These findings implicate a collateral mechanism of PARPi in preventing prostate cancer cell growth/survival that may augment previously described mechanisms related to HDR and synthetic lethality. It is essential to understand the role of PARPi beyond synthetic lethality in the context of HRD in order to better define the spectrum of response to PARPi across patients, and for development of biology-informed combination therapies.

Antagonistic action of a synthetic androgen ligand mediated by chromatin remodeling in a human prostate cancer cell line

The clinical use of androgen receptor (AR) antagonists has been successful in treating prostate cancer patients, inducing remission of androgen-dependent tumors. However, a couple of years after treatment, prostate tumors transition into an androgen-independent state with altered gene expression profiles, but the molecular basis is not understood. Since the AR antagonists trigger this transition, we assessed whether AR antagonists induce chromatin reorganization in an androgen-dependent prostate cancer cell line (LNCaP). Treatment of LNCaP cells with two clinically used AR antagonists (bicalutamide [Bic] and enzalutamide [Enz]) expectedly resulted in antagonistic effects on cell proliferation, AR transactivation, and dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-induced expression of AR target genes. Thus, the antagonists expectedly acted to antagonize the transactivation function of AR activated by androgen binding. By ChIP-qPCR assay, AR bound to Bic, but not Enz, was recruited to an endogenous consensus AR-binding site within the kallikrein-related peptidase 3 gene promoter after treatment with Bic, similar to the effect of DHT. By ATAC-seq analysis of the cells after long-term treatment for 5 days, Bic and dihydrotestosterone DHT induced different chromatin reorganization patterns and gene expression profiles, suggesting that Bic exhibited a distinct action from that by DHT. Thus, these results suggest that the action of a known AR antagonist is mediated by chromatin reorganization in a prostate cancer cell line.

The Androgen Hormone-Induced Increase in Androgen Receptor Protein Expression Is Caused by the Autoinduction of the Androgen Receptor Translational Activity

The androgen receptor (AR) plays a central role in prostate, muscle, bone and adipose tissue. Moreover, dysregulated AR activity is a driving force in prostate cancer (PCa) initiation and progression. Consequently, antagonizing AR signalling cascades via antiandrogenic therapy is a crucial treatment option in PCa management. Besides, very high androgen levels also inhibit PCa cells’ growth, so this effect could also be applied in PCa therapy. However, on the molecular and cellular level, these mechanisms have hardly been investigated so far. Therefore, the present study describes the effects of varying androgen concentrations on the viability of PCa cells as well as localization, transactivation, and protein stability of the AR. For this purpose, cell viability was determined via WST1 assay. Alterations in AR transactivity were detected by qPCR analysis of AR target genes. A fluorescent AR fusion protein was used to analyse AR localization microscopically. Changes in AR protein expression were detected by Western blot. Our results showed that high androgen concentrations reduce the cell viability in LNCaP and C4-2 cell lines. In addition, androgens have been reported to increase AR transactivity, AR localization, and AR protein expression levels. However, high androgen levels did not reduce these parameters. Furthermore, this study revealed an androgen-induced increase in AR protein synthesis. In conclusion, inhibitory effects on cell viability by high androgen levels are due to AR downstream signalling or non-genomic AR activity. Moreover, hormonal activation of the AR leads to a self-induced stabilization of the receptor, resulting in increased AR activity. Therefore, in clinical use, a therapeutic reduction in androgen levels represents a clinical target and would lead to a decrease in AR activity and, thus, AR-driven PCa progression.

AR Structural Variants and Prostate Cancer.

Therapeutic interventions for advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) are focused on inhibiting the androgen receptor (AR) through targeting of its C-terminal ligand binding domain (LBD). However, a significant subset of CRPC patients demonstrate primary resistance to androgen deprivation and anti-androgen therapies, suggesting that other targets, outside of the AR, might be pertinent to the cancer progression. One explanation is the expression of androgen receptor splice variants (AR-Vs). So far, more than 20 AR-Vs have been identified from both prostate cancer cell lines and prostate cancer tissue biopsies. Most of the AR-Vs have a conserved N-terminal domain, but lack the LBD, yet retain the ability to bind DNA and activate downstream signaling. Although it remains unclear whether AR-Vs are principal divers or mere bystanders of CRPC progression, inhibiting AR-Vs, through drugs that target the AR transactivation function outside of the LBD, has been a major emphasis for next generation therapeutics in prostate cancer. This book chapter is dedicated to the role of AR variants and their clinical importance. We will review the initial discovery of AR-Vs, their regulation and prevalence, as well as their biological function in prostate cancer. We will provide an overview of the role of AR-Vs in the development of metastatic CRPC and in promoting clinical treatment failures. Lastly, we will present an introduction to the therapeutic approaches towards developing AR-V-targeted therapies including the continuing progress, the old challenges, and the new prospects.

Assessment of agonistic and antagonistic properties of humidifier disinfectants to the estrogenic and androgenic receptors by transactivation assay.

Before being recalled and banned from the Korean market, humidifier disinfectants (HDs) were added to the humidifier water tank to prevent microbial growth. The known HDs active ingredients included the are oligo(2-(2-ethoxy)ethoxyethyl guanidine (PGH), polyhexamethylene guanidine (PHMG), a mixture of methylisothiazolinone (MIT) and chloromethylisothiazolinone (CMIT), didecyldimethyl ammonium chloride (DDAC), Sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), and alkyldimethylbenzyl ammonium chloride (BAC). Previous epidemiological studies have suggested that PHMG induces fatal lung disease in pregnant, post-partum women, and young children. In an animal study, a mixture of DDAC and BAC exhibited decreased fertility and fecundity; increased time to first litter, longer pregnancy intervals, fewer pups per litter, and fewer pregnancies. In this study, endocrine-disrupting effects of HDs were investigated using estrogen receptor (ER) and androgen receptor (AR) transactivation assay based on OECD Test guidelines. Unexpectedly, unlike the previously reported reproductive toxicity data, in the present study, HDs did not show ER and AR transcriptional activation agonist and/or antagonist effects. However, it is difficult to conclude that HDs has no endocrine disruption effects, and further research on the effects of HDs mixtures, and in vivo tests including Uterotrophic bioassay and Hershberger bioassay would be necessary.

Arsenic and Protein Expression: It might help to know the mechanism of As toxicity

Arsenic and Protein Expression: It might help to know the mechanism of As toxicity

Androgen receptor phosphorylated at Ser815: The expression and function in the prostate and tumor-derived cells

Androgen is beneficial for the prostate with normal functions but creates a risk for prostate cancer progression. How androgen receptor (AR) mediates these various androgen actions remains elusive. AR conserves a phosphorylation motif within its ligand-binding domain throughout species. Here, we have found AR phosphorylated at Ser815 (P-AR) is expressed in normal tissues of both human and mouse prostates. P-AR begins expression in association with prostatic development and castration decreases its expression levels in the mouse prostate. Functional analysis of AR in prostate cancer PC-3 cells showed ligand-induced AR nuclear translocation and transactivation were disturbed by its phosphorylation at Ser815. Moreover, P-AR suppressed oncogenic AKT signaling suggesting a suppressive function for prostate cancer development. In fact, AR phosphorylation levels progressively decrease in human prostates as cancer worsens. These findings showed androgen might utilize P-AR to self-antagonize oncogenic signals and cancer progression believed to be regulated by non-phosphorylated AR (NonP-AR). By differing its target genes and signal regulations from those of NonP-AR, P-AR co-expression with NonP-AR may be the molecular basis for androgen to balance its actions and to control disease developments.

Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals reproductive impairments caused by PCBs and OH-PCBs through the dysregulation of ER and AR signaling

Reports have highlighted the presence of PCBs and their metabolites, OH-PCBs, in human serum as well as their endocrine-disrupting effects on reproductive function through direct interactions with the androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER). However, the molecular mechanisms directly linking the actions of PCBs and OH-PCBs on the AR and ER to induce reproductive impairment remain poorly understood. In this study, we characterized the cellular response to PCBs and OH-PCBs acting on AR and ER transactivation at the transcriptome level coupled with bioinformatics analysis to identify the downstream pathways of androgen and estrogen signaling that leads to reproductive dysfunction. We first confirmed the agonistic and antagonistic effects of several PCBs and OH-PCBs on AR- and ER-mediated reporter gene activity using the androgen-responsive LNCaP and estrogen-responsive MCF-7 cell lines, respectively. Anti-estrogenic activity was not detected among the tested compounds; however, we found that in addition to anti-androgenic and estrogenic activity, PCB 28 and PCB 138 exhibited androgenic activity, while most of the tested OH-PCBs showed a synergistic effect on DHT-mediated transactivation of the AR. Bioinformatics analysis of transcriptome profiles from selected PCBs and OH-PCBs revealed various pathways that were dysregulated depending on their agonistic, antagonistic, or synergistic effects. The OH-PCBs with estrogenic activity affected pathways including vitamin metabolism and calcium transport. Other notable dysregulated pathways include cholesterol transport in response to androgenic PCBs, thyroid hormone metabolism in response to anti-androgenic PCBs, and antioxidant pathways in response to androgen-synergistic OH-PCBs. Our results demonstrate that PCBs and OH-PCBs directly alter specific pathways through androgen- or estrogen-mediated signaling, thereby providing additional insights into the mechanisms by which these compounds cause reproductive dysfunction.

Interplay of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 in Prostate Cancer: Beyond Androgen Receptor Transactivation.

Simple SummaryAndrogen receptor (AR) signaling mainly controls prostate cancer (PCa) growth. Hence, the conventional regimen for PCa includes androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) or antiandrogen in order to reduce PCa recurrence. However, castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is insensitive to environmental androgen via self-supplementation of androgen or inactivation of AR signaling. Accordingly, CRPC has limited treating options and their outcome is poor. Previous studies reveal that forming CRPC needs to maintain cell growth under low AR signaling conditions and to mitigate AR dependency by differentiation. Previous studies show that the epidermal growth factor (EGFR) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) participate in the maintenance of PCa growth under androgen ablation. We have found a novel mechanism in which EGFR cooperates with STAT3 and initiates neuroendocrine differentiation. This review aims to summarize the recent findings on EGFR and STAT3 in CRPC induction and discuss the unsolved issues therein.Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers in the world and causes thousands of deaths every year. Conventional therapy for PCa includes surgery and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, about 10–20% of all PCa cases relapse; there is also the further development of castration resistant adenocarcinoma (CRPC-Adeno) or neuroendocrine (NE) PCa (CRPC-NE). Due to their androgen-insensitive properties, both CRPC-Adeno and CRPC-NE have limited therapeutic options. Accordingly, this study reveals the inductive mechanisms of CRPC (for both CRPC-Adeno and CRPC-NE) and fulfils an urgent need for the treatment of PCa patients. Although previous studies have illustrated the emerging roles of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR), signal transducer, and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling in the development of CRPC, the regulatory mechanisms of this interaction between EGFR and STAT3 is still unclear. Our recent studies have shown that crosstalk between EGFR and STAT3 is critical for NE differentiation of PCa. In this review, we have collected recent findings with regard to the involvement of EGFR and STAT3 in malignancy progression and discussed their interactions during the development of therapeutic resistance for PCa.

Long noncoding RNA GAS5 interacts and suppresses androgen receptor activity in prostate cancer cells.

The androgen receptor (AR) plays an important role in the progression of prostate cancer and is the most important therapeutic target. However, androgen deprivation therapy will finally lead patients to progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Here, we confirmed that GAS5, a long noncoding RNA, could interact and suppress AR transactivation in CRPC C4-2 cells. Knockdown GAS5 by short hairpin RNA would enhance the transcription of AR via promote AR recruitment to the promoter of its downstream target genes. Functionally, GAS5 overexpression inhibits cell proliferation partially through inhibiting AR transactivation in C4-2 cells. Moreover, knocking down GAS5 protects C4-2 cells from the docetaxel-induced cell apoptosis. In return, the suppressed AR was found to downregulate the GAS5 expression, which forms a feedback loop resulted in AR high transcription activity in CRPC. Collectively, our findings revealed the important role of GAS5 in AR axis activity regulation and CRPC progression. Targeting GAS5 to intervene the feedback loop might be a new potential therapeutic approach for the patients at CRPC stage.

Regulation of transgelin and GST-pi proteins in the tissues of hamsters exposed to sodium arsenite

Regulation of transgelin and GST-pi proteins in the tissues of hamsters exposed to sodium arsenite

Does and duration of exposure time dependent regulation of proteins in the urinary bladder of hamsters exposed to sodium arsenite

Does and duration of exposure time dependent regulation of proteins in the urinary bladder of hamsters exposed to sodium arsenite

Phosphorylation of the androgen receptor at Ser81 is co-sustained by CDK1 and CDK9 and leads to AR-mediated transactivation in prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor (AR) is the principal molecule in prostate cancer (PCa) etiology and therapy. AR re‐activation still remains a major challenge during treatment of castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) tumors that relapse after castration therapies. Recent reports have indicated the enrichment of Ser81‐phosphorylated AR (pS81) in the nucleus of CRPC cells, and CDK1 and CDK9 as the kinases phosphorylating AR at S81. In the current study we showed that pS81 is preferentially localized in the nucleus in both rapid biopsy metastatic CRPC samples and PCa xenografts, and nuclear pS81 localization is correlated with AR transactivation in tumor xenografts. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) analysis demonstrated an alignment of S81 phosphorylation and AR‐mediated transactivation with the chromatin locus openness. Moreover, pS81‐specific ChIP‐Seq showed a disproportional occupancy of pS81 on AR‐activated promoters, while 3C‐ChIP assays further indicated an enrichment of pS81 at the PSA enhancer‐promoter loop, a known AR activating hub. In the latter, CDK9 was shown to modulate the transactivation of the AR and RNA Pol II. Indeed, ChIP and re‐ChIP assays also confirmed that AR‐dependent activation of the PSA enhancer and promoter mediated by pS81 was coupled with activation of Pol II and the pTEFb complex. Mechanistically, we determined that CDK1 and CDK9 sustained the pS81 AR modification in the soluble and chromatin‐bound fractions of PCa cells, respectively. Finally, we demonstrated that CDK1 activity was maintained throughout the cell cycle, and that CDK1 inhibitors restored androgen sensitivity in CRPC tumor cells. Based on these findings, CDK1 and CDK9 could be targeted as pS81 kinases in patients with CRPC, either alone or in conjunction with direct AR antagonists.

Disruption of Estrogenic and Androgenic Bioactivities in Human Fetuses Exposed to Maternal Smoking

Endocrine disruptors (EDs) interfere with hormonal signalling and, given that multiple developmental processes are hormone-driven, the prenatal period is a window of increased sensitivity. Maternal smoking is a real-life model of in utero exposure to a complex mixture of EDs. Cigarette smoke contains of >7,000 pollutants, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), which are AhR ligands and cross-talk with the estrogen receptor (ER) system. Prenatal exposure to cigarette smoke is associated with adverse outcomes, including intrauterine growth restriction and increased risk of metabolic syndrome later in life. We aimed to evaluate ED effects associated with smoke exposure in human fetuses. Fetal tissues (plasma, n=48; placenta, n=30; liver, n=29) from elective terminations of normally progressing pregnancies, ranging from 10 to 20 gestation weeks, were collected (SAFeR and FEGO studies: REC 15/NS/0123, REC 04/S0802/21). PAHs and PAH-like compounds were extracted from placenta and fetal liver. Bioactivity levels in plasma, placenta and liver extracts were determined using ER and androgen receptor (AR) transactivation reporter gene assays. PAH burden was evaluated using the AhR-responsive DRhp-CALUX assay. Smoke exposure was associated with a 1.3-fold increase in plasma estrogenic activity. The developmental trajectory of androgenic activity was altered in plasma of smoke-exposed fetuses, with significant anti-androgenic activity in older fetuses (>16 weeks of gestation). In males, plasma androgenic activity was positively associated with testes weight and anogenital distance. In contrast, placentas from smoking mothers had significantly increased androgenic potential. Furthermore, AhR-like activity was 2.9-fold higher in smoke-exposed placentas compared to controls, and 2.3-fold higher in female compared to male fetal livers. Overall, all bioactivity levels were higher in placentas compared to fetal liver. Prenatal exposure to cigarette smoke is associated with higher placental AhR activation, indicative of increased xenotoxicants burden. We also report that smoke-exposed fetuses showed increased circulating estrogenic activity and disrupted androgenic potential, across 10-20 weeks of gestation, in both fetal plasma and placenta. This demonstrates that EDs present in cigarette smoke are able to interfere with hormonal signalling and alter dynamic endocrine activity profiles, which are critical to ensure appropriate, sex-specific, development. These ED effects are likely to disturb placental function and reprogramme fetal development and thus impacting on life-long health.

Endocrine disrupting potential of veterinary drugs by in vitro stably transfected human androgen receptor transcriptional activation assays

We describe the androgen receptor (AR) agonistic/antagonistic effects of 140 veterinary drugs regulated in Republic of Korea, by setting maximum residue limits. It was conducted using two in vitro test guidelines of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)—the AR-EcoScreen AR transactivation (TA) assay and the 22Rv1/MMTV_GR-KO AR TA assay. These were performed alongside the AR binding affinity assay to confirm whether their AR agonistic/antagonistic effects are based on the binding affinity to AR. Prior to conducting the AR TA assay, the proficiency test was passed the proficiency performance criterion for the AR agonist and AR antagonist assays. Among the veterinary drugs tested, four veterinary drugs (dexamethasone, trenbolone, altrenogest, and nandrolone) and six veterinary drugs (cymiazole, dexamethasone, zeranol, phenothiazine, bromopropylate, and isoeugenol) were determined as AR agonist and AR antagonist, respectively in both in vitro AR TA assays. Zeranol exhibited weak AR agonistic effects with a PC10 value only in the 22Rv1/MMTV_GR-KO AR TA assay. Regarding changing the AR agonistic/antagonistic effects through metabolism, the AR antagonistic activities of zeranol, phenothiazine, and isoeugenol decreased significantly in the presence of phase I + II enzymes.These data indicate that various veterinary drugs could have the potential to disrupt AR-mediated human endocrine system. Furthermore, this is the first report providing information on AR agonistic/antagonistic effects of veterinary drugs using in vitro OECD AR TA assays.

Synthesis of dihydrotestosterone derivatives modified in the A-ring with (hetero)arylidene, pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine and triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine moieties and their targeting of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer

One of the main directions of steroid research is the preparation of modified derivatives in which, in addition to changes in physicochemical properties, receptor binding is significantly altered, thus a bioactivity different from that of the parent compound predominates. In the frame of this work, 2-arylidene derivatives were first synthesized by regioselective modification of the A-ring of natural sex hormone, 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT). After Claisen-Schmidt condensations of DHT with (hetero)aromatic aldehydes in alkaline EtOH, heterocyclizations of the α,β-enones were performed with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole, 3-aminopyrazole and 3-amino-5-methylpyrazole in the presence of t-BuOK in DMF to afford 7′-epimeric mixtures of A-ring-fused azolo-dihydropyrimidines, respectively. Depending on the electronic demand of the substituents of the arylidene moiety, spontaneous or 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ)-induced oxidation of the heteroring led to triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines and pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines in good yields, while, using the Jones reagent as a strong oxidant, 17-oxidation also occurred. The crystal structures of an arylidene and a triazolopyrimidine product have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction and both were found to crystallize in the monoclinic crystal system at P21 space group. Most derivatives were found to diminish the transcriptional activity of androgen receptor (AR) in reporter cell line. The candidate compound (17β-hydroxy-2-(4-chloro)benzylidene-5α-androstan-3-one, 2f) showed to suppress androgen-mediated AR transactivation in a dose-dependent manner. We confirmed the cellular interaction of 2f with AR, described the binding in AR-binding cavity by the flexible docking and showed the ability of the compound to suppress the expression of AR-regulated genes in two prostate cancer cell lines.

Characterisation and validation of an in vitro transactivation assay based on the 22Rv1/MMTV_GR-KO cell line to detect human androgen receptor agonists and antagonists

We describe the characterisation and validation of an androgen receptor (AR) transactivation assay for detection of AR agonists and antagonists using a stably transfected human prostate cancer cell line. This 22Rv1/mouse mammary tumour virus glucocorticoid knock-out cell line based AR transactivation assay was validated by criteria in Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Guidance Document 34 to determine if the assay performed equally well to the AR EcoScreen Assay included in Test Guideline for AR Transactivation (OECD TG 458).There was no Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) crosstalk, and no changes in the AR DNA sequence in cells after the successful knock out of GR. Subsequently, the concordance of classifications of the 22 test chemicals was 100% in all laboratories. The AR agonistic and antagonistic inter-laboratory coefficients of variation based on log[10% effect for 10 nM DHT, PC10] and log[inhibitory response of 800 pM DHT by at 30%, IC30] from comprehensive tests were 2.75% and 2.44%, respectively. The AR agonist/antagonist test chemical classifications were consistent across AR EcoScreen ARTA assay data for 82/89%, and the balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 83/90%, 88/100% and 78/80%, respectively.This assay was successfully validated and was approved for inclusion in TG 458 in 2020.

The function of BAP18 on modulation of androgen receptor action in luteinized granulosa cells from normal weight women with and without PCOS

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common endocrine disorders in reproductive-age women. In this study, BPTF associated protein of 18 kDa (BAP18) is decreased in luteinized granulosa cells (GCs) from PCOS women. BAP18 depletion significantly decreases CYP19A1 expression levels, leading to an abrogation in transfer capacity of androgen to estrogen in GCs. Also, BAP18 knockdown delays cell cycle G1 to S phase transition and induces cell apoptosis to decrease GCs proliferation. We also provide evidence showing BAP18 interacts with androgen receptor (AR) and enhances AR-mediated transactivation in GCs. Results indicate that AR or BAP18 recruits to androgen response elements (AREs) of CYP19A1 and FSHR, which are putative AR-induced genes in GCs. BAP18 interacts with Sp1 transcription factor and co-recruits to the promoter region of AR gene, resulting in AR transactivation in GCs. Taken together, these data provide new insights on the pathophysiology of PCOS.

Assessment of chemical mixtures using biomarkers of combined biological activity: A screening study in human placentas

Humans are simultaneously exposed to complex mixtures of chemicals with limited knowledge on potential health effects, therefore improved tools for assessing these mixtures are needed. As part of the Human Biomonitoring for Europe (HBM4EU) Project, we aimed to examine the combined biological activity of chemical mixtures extracted from human placentas using one in vivo and four in vitro bioassays, also known as biomarkers of combined effect. Relevant endocrine activities (proliferative and/or reporter gene assays) and four endpoints were tested: the estrogen receptor (ER), androgen receptor (AR), and aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activities, as well as thyroid hormone (TH) signaling. Correlations among bioassays and their functional shapes were evaluated. Results showed that all placental extracts agonized or antagonized at least three of the abovementioned endpoints. Most placentas induced ER-mediated transactivation and ER-dependent cell proliferation, together with a strong inhibition of TH signaling and the AR transactivity; while the induction of the AhR was found in only one placental extract. The effects in the two estrogenic bioassays were positively and significantly correlated and the AR-antagonism activity showed a positive borderline-significant correlation with both estrogenic bioassay activities. However, the in vivo anti-thyroid activities of placental extracts were not correlated with any of the tested in vitro assays. Findings highlight the importance of comprehensively mapping the biological effects of “real-world” chemical mixtures present in human samples, through a battery of in vitro and in vivo bioassays. This approach should be a complementary tool for epidemiological studies to further elucidate the combined biological fingerprint triggered by chemical mixtures.