Interaction Of Androgen Receptor Research Articles

Highlights of This Issue

Androgen receptor splice variants (AR-Vs) are implicated in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). When expressed alone, some AR-Vs localize primarily to the nucleus, whereas others localize to the cytoplasm. The clinical relevance of the latter is often dismissed due to their cytoplasm localization. This study demonstrates a significant role of these cytoplasmic-localized AR-Vs in castration resistant disease through dimerizing with the nucleus-predominant AR-Vs and AR. The findings reveal important consequences for clinical castration resistance due to simultaneous expression of AR and different AR-Vs in patient tumors and suggest that dissecting their interactions will lead to effective strategies to disrupt AR-V signaling.While therapeutic benefit of bromodomain and extra-terminal (BET) protein inhibitors for hematological malignancies has been reported, the identification of sensitive solid tumor indications has been challenging. Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) dependence on transcription factor drivers rendered it exquisitely sensitive to ABBV-075, a novel BET inhibitor currently in clinical trials. ABBV-075 disrupted the functional interaction of AR and BRD4 at enhancers to inhibit the androgen receptor (AR) gene expression signature in both androgen-dependent and enzalutamide-resistant models. ABBV-075 activity also converged on parallel transcription factor drivers of CRPC progression, MYC and TMRPSS2-ETS. Thus, this proof-of-concept study supports the development of ABBV-075 in CRPC and similar transcription-factor dependent tumors.In this issue, Balaji and colleagues define a novel role for the AXL receptor tyrosine kinase in modulating the DNA damage and repair (DDR) response across three different cancer model systems. Higher AXL levels associate with higher expression of homologous recombination (HR) genes critical for DNA repair. Furthermore, inhibition of AXL decreases HR gene expression, impairs DNA repair function, and sensitizes to PARP therapy. Given the current clinical development of AXL and PARP inhibitors for both lung and breast cancer, these findings demonstrate that combinatorial inhibition of AXL and PARP significantly increases the therapeutic response beyond either inhibitor alone by inducing a type of synthetic lethality through AXL blockade.Tumor-derived exosomes are emerging mediators of tumorigenesis and tissue-specific metastasis. Proteomic profiling has identified Annexin A2 (AnxA2) as one of the most highly expressed proteins in exosomes; however, studies focused on the biological role of exosomal-Annexin A2 (exo-AnxA2) are still lacking. Using various in vitro and in vivo techniques, Maji and colleagues illustrate that exo-AnxA2 is functionally active and is capable of promoting angiogenesis in a tPA-dependent manner. Furthermore, exo-AnxA2 causes macrophage-mediated activation of the p38MAPK, NF-κB, and STAT3 signaling pathways and increases secretion of IL-6 and TNF-α to promote breast cancer metastasis. Collectively, these data establish for the first time that exo-AnxA2 is an important mediator in breast cancer pathogenesis.

Ailanthone targets p23 to overcome MDV3100 resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Androgen receptor (AR) antagonist MDV3100 is the first therapeutic approach in treating castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), but tumours frequently become drug resistant via multiple mechanisms including AR amplification and mutation. Here we identify the small molecule Ailanthone (AIL) as a potent inhibitor of both full-length AR (AR-FL) and constitutively active truncated AR splice variants (AR-Vs). AIL binds to the co-chaperone protein p23 and prevents AR's interaction with HSP90, thus resulting in the disruption of the AR-chaperone complex followed by ubiquitin/proteasome-mediated degradation of AR as well as other p23 clients including AKT and Cdk4, and downregulates AR and its target genes in PCa cell lines and orthotopic animal tumours. In addition, AIL blocks tumour growth and metastasis of CRPC. Finally, AIL possesses favourable drug-like properties such as good bioavailability, high solubility, lack of CYP inhibition and low hepatotoxicity. In general, AIL is a potential candidate for the treatment of CRPC.

The Amino-terminal Domain of the Androgen Receptor Co-opts Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase (ERK) Docking Sites in ELK1 Protein to Induce Sustained Gene Activation That Supports Prostate Cancer Cell Growth

The ETS domain transcription factor ELK1 is in a repressive association with growth genes and is transiently activated through phosphorylation by ERK1/2. In prostate cancer (PCa) cells the androgen receptor (AR) is recruited by ELK1, via its amino-terminal domain (A/B), as a transcriptional co-activator, without ELK1 hyper-phosphorylation. Here we elucidate the structural basis of the interaction of AR with ELK1. The ELK1 polypeptide motifs required for co-activation by AR versus those required for activation of ELK1 by ERK were systematically mapped using a mammalian two-hybrid system and confirmed using a co-immunoprecipitation assay. The mapping precisely identified the two ERK-docking sites in ELK1, the D-box and the DEF (docking site for ERK, FXFP) motif, as the essential motifs for its cooperation with AR(A/B) or WTAR. In contrast, the transactivation domain in ELK1 was only required for activation by ERK. ELK1-mediated transcriptional activity of AR(A/B) was optimal in the absence of ELK1 binding partners, ERK1/2 and serum-response factor. Purified ELK1 and AR bound with a dissociation constant of 1.9 × 10−8m. A purified mutant ELK1 in which the D-box and DEF motifs were disrupted did not bind AR. An ELK1 mutant with deletion of the D-box region had a dominant-negative effect on androgen-dependent growth of PCa cells that were insensitive to MEK inhibition. This novel mechanism in which a nuclear receptor impinges on a signaling pathway by co-opting protein kinase docking sites to constitutively activate growth genes could enable rational design of a new class of targeted drug interventions.

Testosterone supplementation improves glucose homeostasis despite increasing hepatic insulin resistance in male mouse model of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Clinical studies have revealed that testosterone supplementation had a positive effect on glucose homeostasis in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but did not address how testosterone supplementation affected insulin responsiveness in the liver, a key glucose homeostatic organ. In this study, we aimed to study the effect of testosterone supplementation on hepatic insulin responsiveness and glucose homeostasis through liver in male high-fat diet-induced T2DM mice. Testosterone treatment to T2DM animals showed reduced hepatic glucose output. Testosterone inhibited the insulin signaling in liver, thus increased insulin resistance. However, testosterone treatment inactivated GSK3α independent of PI3K/AKT pathway and inhibited FOXO1 By interaction of androgen receptor to FOXO1 and downregulated PEPCK, causing repression of gluconeogenic pathway, which is otherwise upregulated in T2DM, resulted in better glucose homeostasis.

Activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway by androgen through interaction of p85α, androgen receptor, and Src.

This article has been withdrawn by the authors. The same data were used to represent different experimental conditions. Specifically, lanes 1–3 of the H2B panel of Fig. 4B were reused in lanes 1–3 of the H2B panel from Fig. 6B. Lanes 1 and 6 of the phospho-Akt panel from Fig. 4C were duplicated. Lanes 3 and 4 of the lower FLAG panel in Fig. 4C were reused in lanes 7 and 8 of the lower FLAG panel in Fig. 5A. The PI(3,4)P2 spots from lanes 1 and 2 from Fig. 7 were reused in lanes 7 and 8 of the same panel. Additionally, some PI(4)P1 spots were pasted in. The authors state that the overall conclusions of this work are not affected.

Sintokamide A Is a Novel Antagonist of Androgen Receptor That Uniquely Binds Activation Function-1 in Its Amino-terminal Domain

Androgen receptor (AR) is a validated drug target for all stages of prostate cancer including metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). All current hormone therapies for CRPC target the C-terminal ligand-binding domain of AR and ultimately all fail with resumed AR transcriptional activity. Within the AR N-terminal domain (NTD) is activation function-1 (AF-1) that is essential for AR transcriptional activity. Inhibitors of AR AF-1 would potentially block most AR mechanisms of resistance including constitutively active AR splice variants that lack the ligand-binding domain. Here we provide evidence that sintokamide A (SINT1) binds AR AF-1 region to specifically inhibit transactivation of AR NTD. Consistent with SINT1 targeting AR AF-1, it attenuated transcriptional activities of both full-length AR and constitutively active AR splice variants, which correlated with inhibition of growth of enzalutamide-resistant prostate cancer cells expressing AR splice variants. In vivo, SINT1 caused regression of CRPC xenografts and reduced expression of prostate-specific antigen, a gene transcriptionally regulated by AR. Inhibition of AR activity by SINT1 was additive to EPI-002, a known AR AF-1 inhibitor that is in clinical trials (NCT02606123). This implies that SINT1 binds to a site on AF-1 that is unique from EPI. Consistent with this suggestion, these two compounds showed differences in blocking AR interaction with STAT3. This work provides evidence that the intrinsically disordered NTD of AR is druggable and that SINT1 analogs may provide a novel scaffold for drug development for the treatment of prostate cancer or other diseases of the AR axis.

Identification of the C-terminal domain of Daxx acts as a potential regulator of intracellular cholesterol synthesis in HepG2 cells

Daxx is a highly conserved nuclear transcriptional factor, which has been implicated in many nuclear processes including transcription and cell cycle regulation. Our previous study demonstrated Daxx also plays a role in regulation of intracellular cholesterol content. Daxx contains several domains that are essential for interaction with a growing number of proteins. To delineate the underlying mechanism of hypocholesterolemic activity of Daxx, we constructed a set of plasmids which can be used to overexpress different fragments of Daxx and transfected to HepG2 cells. We found that the C- terminal region Daxx626–740 clearly reduced intracellular cholesterol levels and inhibited the expression of SREBPs and SCAP. In GST pull-down experiments and Double immunofluorescence assays, Daxx626–740 was demonstrated to bind directly to androgen receptor (AR). Our findings suggest that the interaction of Daxx626-740 and AR abolishes the AR-mediated activation of SCAP/SREBPs pathway, which suppresses the de novo cholesterol synthesis. Thus, C-terminal domain of Daxx acts as a potential regulator of intracellular cholesterol content in HepG2 cells.

Inhibition effect of cypermethrin mediated by co-regulators SRC-1 and SMRT in interleukin-6-induced androgen receptor activation

It is hypothesized that the pesticide cypermethrin may induce androgen receptor (AR) antagonism via ligand-independent mechanisms. The Real-Time Cell Analysis (RTCA) iCELLigence system was used to investigate the inhibitory effect of cypermethrin on interleukin-6 (IL-6)–induced ligand-independent LNCaP cell growth. Then, the mammalian two-hybrid assays were applied to clarify whether the mechanism of IL-6–induced AR antagonism of cypermethrin was associated with the interactions of the AR and co-activator steroid receptor co-activator-1 (SRC-1) and co-repressor silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT). Cypermethrin inhibited the LNCaP cell growth induced by IL-6. The interactions of AR–SRC-1 and AR–SMRT mediated by IL-6 were suppressed by cypermethrin. The results indicate that the IL-6–mediated AR antagonism induced by cypermethrin is related to repress the recruitment of co-regulators SRC-1 and SMRT to the AR in a ligand-independent manner. Inhibition of the interactions of AR–SRC-1 and AR–SMRT mediated by IL-6 contributes to the AR antagonism induced by cypermethrin.

Abstract B15: Androgen receptor recruitment to c-Jun promoter region regulates chemosensitivity of prostate cancer cells to taxane therapy

Abstract Introduction & Objectives. We have previously reported that response of prostate cancer (PC) to taxane therapy is based on the interplay between androgen receptor (AR) and c-jun However, the cellular mechanisms of taxane treatment in prostate cancer cells are not fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sustained down-regulation of c-jun on the outcome of taxane therapy using LNCaP cells transfected with c-jun shRNA, and to characterize the nature of the c-jun and AR interaction in regard to their corresponding promoter regions. Material & Methods. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (CHIP) assay was performed to examine gene recruitment. LNCaP cells were treated with Docetaxel (Doc) or Paclitaxel (Pac) and resulting chromatin preparations were analyzed by PCR. To analyse the impact of c-jun downregulation on AR and prostate cancer response to therapy we used LNCaP cells harboring stable knocked down c-jun (LNsiJun). Cells were exposed to Doc, Pac DHT for different time-points and the medium were subjected for PSA analysis using DELFIA 1234 fluorometer and cell response to drugs assessed by MTT assay. Results. Taxane treatment of LNsiJun cells led to a statistically significant decrease of cell viability compared to parental LNCaP cells (p<0,05) independent on the substance used. Interestingly, exposure of LNsiJun cells to DHT resulted in increased cell death. LNsiJun cells treated with docetaxel (Doc) showed an up-regulation of AR and PSA protein levels after 24 hours, whereas Paclitaxel (Pac) treatment resulted in a down-regulation of both proteins which matched our observations in parental LNCaP cells. To further investigate this taxane specific effect on AR, ChIP assay revealed that AR binds to the c-jun promoter region upon Doc exposure. However, Pac treatment failed to do so. Both taxanes resulted in an enhanced binding of c-jun to the corresponding promoter region. Conclusions. In conclusion, down-regulation of endogenous c-jun enhances sensitivity of LNCaP cells to taxane treatment. Binding of AR to the c-jun promoter is taxane specific and results in different expression levels of AR and PSA. Citation Format: Nishtman Dizeyi, Martina V. Tinzl, Marieke van der Molen, Julius Semenas, Per-Anders Abrahamsson. Androgen receptor recruitment to c-Jun promoter region regulates chemosensitivity of prostate cancer cells to taxane therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B15.

Inhibitor of p52 NF-κB subunit and androgen receptor (AR) interaction reduces growth of human prostate cancer cells by abrogating nuclear translocation of p52 and phosphorylated AR(ser81).

Accumulating evidence shows that androgen receptor (AR) activation and signaling plays a key role in growth and progression in all stages of prostate cancer, even under low androgen levels or in the absence of androgen in the castration-resistant prostate cancer. Sustained activation of AR under androgen-deprived conditions may be due to its interaction with co-activators, such as p52 NF-κB subunit, and/or an increase in its stability by phosphorylation that delays its degradation. Here we identified a specific inhibitor of AR/p52 interaction, AR/p52-02, via a high throughput screen based on the reconstitution of Gaussia Luciferase. We found that AR/p52-02 markedly inhibited growth of both castration-resistant C4-2 (IC50 ∼6 μM) and parental androgen-dependent LNCaP (IC50 ∼4 μM) human prostate cancer cells under low androgen conditions. Growth inhibition was associated with significantly reduced nuclear p52 levels and DNA binding activity, as well as decreased phosphorylation of AR at serine 81, increased AR ubiquitination, and decreased AR transcriptional activity as indicated by decreased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNA levels in both cell lines. AR/p52-02 also caused a reduction in levels of p21(WAF/CIP1), which is a direct AR targeted gene in that its expression correlates with androgen stimulation and mitogenic proliferation in prostate cancer under physiologic levels of androgen, likely by disrupting the AR signaling axis. The reduced level of cyclinD1 reported previously for this compound may be due to the reduction in nuclear presence and activity of p52, which directly regulates cyclinD1 expression, as well as the reduction in p21(WAF/CIP1), since p21(WAF/CIP1) is reported to stabilize nuclear cyclinD1 in prostate cancer. Overall, the data suggest that specifically inhibiting the interaction of AR with p52 and blocking activity of p52 and pARser81 may be an effective means of reducing castration-resistant prostate cancer cell growth.

Similarities and Distinctions in Actions of Surface-Directed and Classic Androgen Receptor Antagonists.

The androgen receptor (AR) surface-directed antagonist MJC13 inhibits AR function and proliferation of prostate cancer (PC) cells. These effects are related to arrest of an AR/chaperone complex in the cytoplasm. Here, we compared MJC13 and classic AR antagonists such as flutamide and bicalutamide. Microarray analysis and confirmatory qRT-PCR reveals that MJC13 and flutamide inhibit dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-dependent genes in LNCaP PC cells. Both compounds are equally effective on a genome wide basis and as effective as second generation AR antagonists (MDV3100, ARN-509) at selected genes. MJC13 inhibits AR binding to the prostate specific antigen (PSA) promoter more strongly than flutamide, consistent with different mechanisms of action. Examination of efficacy of MJC13 in conditions that reflect aspects castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) reveals that it inhibits flutamide activation of an AR mutant (ART877A) that emerges during flutamide withdrawal syndrome, but displays greatly restricted gene-specific activity in 22Rv1 cells that express a constitutively active truncated AR and is inactive against glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which can co-opt androgen-dependent signaling networks in CRPC. Importantly, MJC13 inhibits AR interactions with SRC2 and β-catenin in the nucleus and, unlike flutamide, strongly inhibits amplification of AR activity obtained with transfected SRC2 and β-catenin. MJC13 also inhibits DHT and β-catenin-enhanced cell division in LNCaP cells. Thus, a surface-directed antagonist can block AR activity in some conditions in which a classic antagonist fails and may display utility in particular forms of CRPC.

YAP1 and AR interactions contribute to the switch from androgen-dependent to castration-resistant growth in prostate cancer

The transcriptional co-activator Yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1), a key nuclear effector of the Hippo pathway, is a potent oncogene, and yet, the interaction between YAP1 and androgen receptor (AR) remains unexplored. Here we identify YAP1 as a physiological binding partner and positive regulator of AR in prostate cancer. YAP1 and AR co-localize and interact with each other predominantly within cell nuclei by an androgen-dependent mechanism in a hormone naive and an androgen-independent mechanism in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells. The growth suppressor MST1 kinase modulates androgen-dependent and -independent nuclear YAP1-AR interactions through directly regulating YAP1 nuclear accumulation. Disruption of YAP1 signalling by genetic (RNAi) and pharmacological (Verteporfin) approaches suppresses AR-dependent gene expression and prostate cancer cell growth. These findings indicate that the YAP1-AR axis may have a critical role in prostate cancer progression and serves as a viable drug target.

Abstract 83: Comparison of surface-directed and classic androgen receptor antagonists

Abstract Background: The androgen receptor (AR) surface-directed antagonist MJC13 inhibits AR function and proliferation of prostate cancer (PC) cells and these effects are related to arrest of an AR/chaperone complex in the cytoplasm. Here, we compared activities of MJC13 and the classic AR antagonist flutamide. Method and Results: MJC13 and flutamide inhibit all dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-dependent genes in LNCaP PC cells and both compounds are equally effective. Control ChIP assays confirm that MJC13 inhibits AR binding to the prostate specific antigen (PSA) promoter more strongly than flutamide, consistent with different mechanisms of action. Examination of efficacy of MJC13 in conditions that reflect aspects of castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) reveals that it inhibits a flutamide-dependent AR mutant (ART877A), but displays greatly restricted gene-specific activity in 22Rv1 cells that express a constitutively active truncated AR and is inactive against glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which can co-opt androgen-dependent signaling networks in CRPC. While flutamide inhibits AR interactions with the coactivator SRC2, it does not affect β-catenin binding. In contrast, MJC13 inhibits AR interactions with both coregulators and, unlike flutamide, strongly inhibits amplification of AR activity obtained with SRC2 and β-catenin. MJC13 also preferentially inhibits β-catenin-enhanced cell division in LNCaP cells relative to flutamide. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that a surface-directed antagonist can block AR activity in some conditions in which a classic antagonist fails and may display utility in some forms of CRPC. Citation Format: Ji Ho Suh, Arundhati Chattopadhyay, Douglas H. Sieglaff, Cheryl L. Storer, Marc B. Cox, Paul Webb. Comparison of surface-directed and classic androgen receptor antagonists. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 83. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-83

Estrogen induces androgen-repressed SOX4 expression to promote progression of prostate cancer cells.

The sex determing region Y-box 4 (SOX4) gene is a critical developmental transcriptional factor that is overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa). While we and others have investigated the role of SOX4 overexpression in PCa, the molecular mechanism underlying its aberrant expression remains unclear. Immunohistochemistry were utilized to detect SOX4 expression and the correlation between estrogen receptor β (ERβ), androgen receptor (AR) and SOX4 in a cohort of 94 clinical specimens. Real-time quantitative PCR and Western blotting were used to study the transcript and protein expression levels. Immunofluorescence staining and co-immunoprecipitation were performed to assess the interaction and subcellular location of ERβ and AR. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays and Luciferase reporter assays were performed to explore the binding and transcriptional activities of ERβ and AR to the SOX4 promoter. Cellular function was evaluated by MTS, invasion and wound healing assays. SOX4 expression is up-regulated in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) tumors compared to hormone-dependent PCa (HDPC) cases. Increased expression was also observed in PCa cells after long-term androgen-deprivation treatment (ADT). In vitro data indicated that SOX4 is an AR transcriptional target and down-regulated by dihydrotestosterone (DHT) via AR. 17β-estradiol (E2) up-regulates SOX4 expression in the absence of androgen through the formation of a protein complex between ERβ and AR. Knockdown of AR or ERβ blocks the E2-induced SOX4 expression. ChIP assays confirmed that both ERβ and AR bind to the SOX4 promoter in response to E2. Functionally, silencing SOX4 significantly attenuates the proliferative effect, as well as the capacity of migration and invasion of E2 on PCa cells. Clinically, overexpression of SOX4 is significantly associated with ERβ expression in PCa. In addition, this association is still retained in CRPC patients with poor prognosis. These findings suggest that SOX4 is a novel DHT-repressed AR-target gene. E2 could promote proliferation of PCa cells through the up-regulation of SOX4 under androgen-depleted environment. Our data provides a possible molecular basis for the overexpression of SOX4 in CRPC and may facilitate the detection and prevention of the emergence of CRPC.

THE DUAL ROLE OF ANDROGEN RECEPTOR IN MESENCHYMAL CELLS

The androgen receptor (AR) mediates differentiation, proliferation and transformation of target tissues. These processes require a crosstalk between epithelial and stromal cells. Prostate cancer (PCa) represents a major cause of cancer-related mortality in men, and is often associated with deregulation of androgen/AR axis. Clinical and molecular findings have highlighted the role of epithelial AR in PCa progression. In contrast, the functions of AR in mesenchymal cells are still unclear. We previously reported that low androgen concentration (1 pM) triggers interaction of AR with the Src tyrosine kinase and PI3-K, thus driving cell cycle progression in fibroblasts. In contrast, stimulation of fibroblasts and fibrosarcoma cells with physiological (10 nM) androgen concentration leads to interaction of AR with full-length filamin A (FLNa) and does not trigger DNA synthesis. On the basis of these findings, we re-examined the role of androgen/AR axis in fibroblasts and human fibrosarcoma HT1080 cells. Recently, we obtained two original and integrated findings on the decision of mesenchymal cells to undergo reversible quiescence and migrate upon stimulation with 10 nM androgens (Castoria et al. 2011 and 2014). This decision is dependent upon the interaction of AR with FLNa. Once assembled, the bipartite AR/FLNa complex recruits a1-integrin and triggers Rac1 activation, thereby enhancing on the one hand cell motility. On the other, Rac 1 activation triggers its downstream effector DYRK 1B, which phosphorylates Ser10 of p27. Stabilization of p27 and cell quiescence then follow. These results strengthen and extend our studies, adding a new and exciting piece to the complex puzzle of signaling networks activated by androgens in target cells. Our findings might have implications for current approaches to AR-related diseases.

Hydrazinobenzoylcurcumin inhibits androgen receptor activity and growth of castration-resistant prostate cancer in mice.

There is a critical need for therapeutic agents that can target the amino-terminal domain (NTD) of androgen receptor (AR) for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Calmodulin (CaM) binds to the AR NTD and regulates AR activity. We discovered that Hydrazinobenzoylcurcumin (HBC), which binds exclusively to CaM, inhibited AR activity. HBC abrogated AR interaction with CaM, suppressed phosphorylation of AR Serine81, and blocked the binding of AR to androgen-response elements. RNA-Seq analysis identified 57 androgen-regulated genes whose expression was significantly (p ≤ 0.002) altered in HBC treated cells as compared to controls. Oncomine analysis revealed that genes repressed by HBC are those that are usually overexpressed in prostate cancer (PCa) and genes stimulated by HBC are those that are often down-regulated in PCa, suggesting a reversing effect of HBC on androgen-regulated gene expression associated with PCa. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis revealed a role of HBC affected genes in cellular functions associated with proliferation and survival. HBC was readily absorbed into the systemic circulation and inhibited the growth of xenografted CRPC tumors in nude mice. These observations demonstrate that HBC inhibits AR activity by targeting the AR NTD and suggest potential usefulness of HBC for effective treatment of CRPC.

Protein Arginine Methyltransferase 6 Enhances Polyglutamine-Expanded Androgen Receptor Function and Toxicity in Spinal and Bulbar Muscular Atrophy

SummaryPolyglutamine expansion in androgen receptor (AR) is responsible for spinobulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA) that leads to selective loss of lower motor neurons. Using SBMA as a model, we explored the relationship between protein structure/function and neurodegeneration in polyglutamine diseases. We show here that protein arginine methyltransferase 6 (PRMT6) is a specific co-activator of normal and mutant AR and that the interaction of PRMT6 with AR is significantly enhanced in the AR mutant. AR and PRMT6 interaction occurs through the PRMT6 steroid receptor interaction motif, LXXLL, and the AR activating function 2 surface. AR transactivation requires PRMT6 catalytic activity and involves methylation of arginine residues at Akt consensus site motifs, which is mutually exclusive with serine phosphorylation by Akt. The enhanced interaction of PRMT6 and mutant AR leads to neurodegeneration in cell and fly models of SBMA. These findings demonstrate a direct role of arginine methylation in polyglutamine disease pathogenesis.

Elevated LIM kinase 1 in nonmetastatic prostate cancer reflects its role in facilitating androgen receptor nuclear translocation.

Prostate cancer affects a large proportion of the male population, and is primarily driven by androgen receptor (AR) activity. First-line treatment typically consists of reducing AR signaling by hormone depletion, but resistance inevitably develops over time. One way to overcome this issue is to block AR function via alternative means, preferably by inhibiting protein targets that are more active in tumors than in normal tissue. By staining prostate cancer tumor sections, elevated LIM kinase 1 (LIMK1) expression and increased phosphorylation of its substrate Cofilin were found to be associated with poor outcome and reduced survival in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. A LIMK-selective small molecule inhibitor (LIMKi) was used to determine whether targeted LIMK inhibition was a potential prostate cancer therapy. LIMKi reduced prostate cancer cell motility, as well as inhibiting proliferation and increasing apoptosis in androgen-dependent prostate cancer cells more effectively than in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells. LIMK inhibition blocked ligand-induced AR nuclear translocation, reduced AR protein stability and transcriptional activity, consistent with its effects on proliferation and survival acting via inhibition of AR activity. Furthermore, inhibition of LIMK activity increased αTubulin acetylation and decreased AR interactions with αTubulin, indicating that the role of LIMK in regulating microtubule dynamics contributes to AR function. These results indicate that LIMK inhibitors could be beneficial for the treatment of prostate cancer both by reducing nuclear AR translocation, leading to reduced proliferation and survival, and by inhibiting prostate cancer cell dissemination.

Characterization of niphatenones that inhibit androgen receptor N-terminal domain.

Androgen ablation therapy causes a temporary reduction in tumor burden in patients with advanced prostate cancer. Unfortunately the malignancy will return to form lethal castration-recurrent prostate cancer (CRPC). The androgen receptor (AR) remains transcriptionally active in CRPC in spite of castrate levels of androgens in the blood. AR transcriptional activity resides in its N-terminal domain (NTD). Possible mechanisms of continued AR transcriptional activity may include, at least in part, expression of constitutively active splice variants of AR that lack the C-terminal ligand-binding domain (LBD). Current therapies that target the AR LBD, would not be effective against these AR variants. Currently no drugs are clinically available that target the AR NTD which should be effective against these AR variants as well as full-length AR. Niphatenones were originally isolated and identified in active extracts from Niphates digitalis marine sponge. Here we begin to characterize the mechanism of niphatenones in blocking AR transcriptional activity. Both enantiomers had similar IC50 values of 6 µM for inhibiting the full-length AR in a functional transcriptional assay. However, (S)-niphatenone had significantly better activity against the AR NTD compared to (R)-niphatenone. Consistent with niphatenones binding to and inhibiting transactivation of AR NTD, niphatenones inhibited AR splice variant. Niphatenone did not affect the transcriptional activity of the related progesterone receptor, but slightly decreased glucocorticoid receptor (GR) activity and covalently bound to GR activation function-1 (AF-1) region. Niphatenone blocked N/C interactions of AR without altering either AR protein levels or its intracellular localization in response to androgen. Alkylation with glutathione suggests that niphatenones are not a feasible scaffold for further drug development.

Abstract 4255: Rational targeting of the Androgen receptor interactome in prostate cancer

Abstract Background: The Androgen receptor (AR) is the central driver of prostate cancer and AR signaling is intact across all stages of disease. The interaction of AR with protein cofactors is critical for its signaling: targeted disruption of these interactions may enable shutdown of AR signaling. Methods: Using known crystal structure, modeled structure and imputed structure based models, peptide agents were rationally designed to block the interface between AR and critical cofactors in its interactome and tested for physiologic activity using prostate cancer cell lines, xenografts and primary tumor explants. Results: Knowledge of the protein cofactors, their interacting motifs and structure of the interface are needed for optimal targeting of protein-protein interactions. Using an iterative rational design approach, we have been able to successfully disrupt three classes of the AR interactome: 1. Interactions where the protein cofactor, the motifs and the structure of the interface is known, (targeting AR-PELP1 interface through a helical LxxLL motif) 2. Interactions where the protein cofactor is known but the motifs and the structure of the interface is not known, (targeting AR-FoxA1 interaction) and 3. Interactions where the motif is known, but neither the protein cofactor nor the structure of the interface are known (only known is a critical motif on AR). The design of initial compounds targeting the interactions in Class 1 was based on crystal structures, while those for Class 2 and Class 3 were based on either predicted or imputed (motif in different context) structures. The interaction between AR and proteins in each of these classes is disrupted by a targeted agent as evidenced by co-immunoprecipitation of endogenous protein cofactors and AR. The functional utility of these agents blocking the AR interactome on AR driven gene expression and proliferation has been validated for agents in Class 1, but is being validated for agents in Classes 2 and 3. In each case, using significant structural modeling, active agents were synthesized with a minimal use of synthesis of analogues. Conclusions: The rational targeting of the AR interactome is feasible and may be a useful complement to traditional screening campaigns. We have demonstrated the utility of this approach to blocking the interface in three distinct classes of protein-protein interactions. Further validation/optimization of these drugs is needed prior to their clinical implementation. Citation Format: Preethi Ravindranathan, Wayne Tilley, Ganesh V. Raj. Rational targeting of the Androgen receptor interactome in prostate cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4255. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4255