Androgen Receptor In Prostate Cancer Research Articles

GLI3 Is Stabilized by SPOP Mutations and Promotes Castration Resistance via Functional Cooperation with Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer.

Although the Sonic hedgehog (SHH) signaling pathway has been implicated in promoting malignant phenotypes of prostate cancer, details on how it is activated and exerts its oncogenic role during prostate cancer development and progression is less clear. Here, we show that GLI3, a key SHH pathway effector, is transcriptionally upregulated during androgen deprivation and posttranslationally stabilized in prostate cancer cells by mutation of speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP). GLI3 is a substrate of SPOP-mediated proteasomal degradation in prostate cancer cells and prostate cancer driver mutations in SPOP abrogate GLI3 degradation. Functionally, GLI3 is necessary and sufficient for the growth and migration of androgen receptor (AR)-positive prostate cancer cells, particularly under androgen-depleted conditions. Importantly, we demonstrate that GLI3 physically interacts and functionally cooperates with AR to enrich an AR-dependent gene expression program leading to castration-resistant growth of xenografted prostate tumors. Finally, we identify an AR/GLI3 coregulated gene signature that is highly correlated with castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer and predictive of disease recurrence. Together, these findings reveal that hyperactivated GLI3 promotes castration-resistant growth of prostate cancer and provide a rationale for therapeutic targeting of GLI3 in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). IMPLICATIONS: We describe two clinically relevant mechanisms leading to hyperactivated GLI3 signaling and enhanced AR/GLI3 cross-talk, suggesting that GLI3-specific inhibitors might prove effective to block prostate cancer development or delay CRPC.

Androgen receptor regulates eIF5A2 expression and promotes prostate cancer metastasis via EMT

Androgen receptor (AR) is an androgen-activated transcription factor of the nuclear receptor superfamily. AR plays a role in the development and progression of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the exact role of AR in PCa metastasis remains unclear. In the present study, we aimed to elucidate the function of AR in PCa. We found that eukaryotic translation initiation factor (EIF) 5A2, an elongation factor that induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in PCa cells, was significantly upregulated after 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulation and downregulated after anti‐androgen bicalutamide treatment in PCa cells with high AR expression, but not in cells with low AR expression. Moreover, eIF5A2 knockdown could eliminate DHT-induced invasion and migration of AR-positive PCa cells. DHT treatment decreased epithelial expression of E‐cadherin and β-catenin but increased the expression of the mesenchymal marker proteins Vimentin and N-cadherin. DHT therefore induced EMT, and knockdown of eIF5A2 inhibited DHT-induced EMT. Moreover, in vivo study, Luciferase signals from the lungs of the eIF5A2 plasmid group indicated higher metastasis ability, and the eIF5A2 siRNA group had lower metastasis ability. Our results suggest that AR positively regulates eIF5A2 expression in androgen-dependent cells, and stimulation of AR expression and signaling in prostate tumors promotes PCa metastasis by EMT induction and upregulation of eIF5A2.

Single-cell analysis reveals androgen receptor regulates the ER-to-Golgi trafficking pathway with CREB3L2 to drive prostate cancer progression.

Androgen receptor (AR) plays a central role in driving prostate cancer (PCa) progression. How AR promotes this process is still not completely clear. Herein, we used single-cell transcriptome analysis to reconstruct the transcriptional network of AR in PCa. Our work shows AR directly regulates a set of signature genes in the ER-to-Golgi protein vesicle-mediated transport pathway. The expression of these genes is required for maximum androgen-dependent ER-to-Golgi trafficking, cell growth, and survival. Our analyses also reveal the signature genes are associated with PCa progression and prognosis. Moreover, we find inhibition of the ER-to-Golgi transport process with a small molecule enhanced antiandrogen-mediated tumor suppression of hormone-sensitive and insensitive PCa. Finally, we demonstrate AR collaborates with CREB3L2 in mediating ER-to-Golgi trafficking in PCa. In summary, our findings uncover a critical role for dysregulation of ER-to-Golgi trafficking expression and function in PCa progression, provide detailed mechanistic insights for how AR tightly controls this process, and highlight the prospect of targeting the ER-to-Golgi pathway as a therapeutic strategy for advanced PCa.

In vitro and in silico studies of holothurin A on androgen receptor in prostate cancer

The androgen receptor (AR) plays a crucial role in the growth of prostate cancer, and has long been considered the cancer’s primary strategic therapeutic target. However, despite the early susceptibility, patients receiving hormonal therapy targeting AR are likely to develops resistance to the treatment and progresses to the castration-resistant stage as a consequence of the mutation at the ligand binding pocket of AR. Interestingly, the surface pocket of the AR called binding function 3 (BF3) has been reported as a great benefit for treating a recurrent tumor. Herein, we investigate the potential of using a marine triterpenoid saponin, holothurin A, on targeting AR expression of prostate cancer using in vitro and in silico studies. Holothurin A reduced the PSA expression, leading to the growth inhibition of androgen sensitive prostate cancer cell line through a downregulation of AR activity. The molecular docking study demonstrated that holothurin A could bind strongly in the BF3 pocket by energetically favorable hydrogen acceptor and hydrophobic with a calculated binding affinity of −13.90 kcal/mol. Molecular dynamics simulations provided the additional evidence that holothurin A can form a stable complex with the BF3 pocket through the hydrophobic interactions with VAL676, ILE680, and ALA721. As a consequence, holothurin A modulates the activation function-2 (AF2) site of the AR through repositioning of the residues in the AF2 pocket. Targeting alternatives sites on the surface of AR via holothurin A will provide a potential candidate for future prostate cancer treatment. Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma

Abstract 2470: Defining the reciprocal regulation of Abi1 and the androgen receptor in prostate cancer

Abstract Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is a slowly progressing disease that affects nearly 50% of males over the age of 60. Current therapies for patients diagnosed with advanced PCa include Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) and anti-androgen receptor (Anti-AR) treatment. PCa treatment primarily targets the androgen receptor (AR), a ligand-activated transcription factor, which is a key driver of PCa tumor growth. Our previous research has demonstrated that ABI1, acts as a tumor suppressor in PCa. ABI1 is a scaffold protein and an integral member of the WAVE Regulatory Complex (WRC), a nucleation promoting factor. UCSC database indicates there is an AR binding site within the ABI1 gene, suggesting AR plays a role in the transcriptional regulation of ABI1. In this study, we aim to characterize the ABI1-dependent AR regulation in PCa. Method: We generated an ABI1 KO cell line model in LNCaP cells using CRISPR-Cas9. The efficiency of CRISPR-Cas9 was evaluated by Western Blotting and genomic alterations confirmed by DNA sequencing. In addition, we have generated ABI1 Isoform-specific rescue cell lines in our LNCaP ABI1 KO cell line with a binding mutation in the SH3 domain (ABI1-W485N) and an SH3 domain deleted (Abi1-ΔSH3) ABI1 protein. To understand AR and ABI1 dependent pathways we performed qPCR, co-immunoprecipitation, Western Blotting, ChIP, in vitro fluorescence spectra assay, immunofluorescence, proximity ligation assays. Results: In vitro binding assays indicate the interaction of AR, NTD poly-proline region, with the ABI1 SH3 domain. Expression of ABI1- W485N in our ABI1 CRISPR KO cell line showed decrease binding, while ABI1-ΔSH3 showed no binding to AR in co-IP assays compared to our control. Consequently, we saw decreased AR nuclear localization compared to our ABI1-WT control. Furthermore, decreased nuclear localization in our ABI1-W485N mutant was associated with decreased mRNA expression of hallmark AR target genes, Prostate-Specific-Antigen (KLK3), and TMPRSS2. ABI1 is an AR responsive gene and was confirmed with ChIP assays in an AR overexpression cell line. Further, the stimulation of AR transcriptional activity increased cell-cell adhesion in an ABI1 dependent system. Conclusions: Our preliminary studies demonstrate that AR and ABI1 have a negative feedback pathway. The loss of ABI1 resulted in a decrease of nuclear AR and a subsequent decrease in mRNA expression of AR target genes. AR can also modulate ABI1 expression on a transcriptional level as needed for this pathway to function. Future studies will investigate if anti-AR treatments could lead to the dysregulation of ABI1 and promote EMT through STAT3 activation until AR transcriptional regulation on ABI1 is restored. These findings will allow for novel insights into the mechanisms underlying AR and ABI1 relationship in neoplastic progression. Citation Format: Baylee A. Porter, Alaji Bah, Alfonso Urbanucci, Fan Zhang, Sonia Kung, Ladan Fazli, Martin Gleave, Gennady Bratslavsky, Leszek Kotula. Defining the reciprocal regulation of Abi1 and the androgen receptor in prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 2470.

Selective androgen receptor modulators activate the canonical prostate cancer androgen receptor program and repress cancer growth.

Prostate cancer (PC) is driven by androgen receptor (AR) activity, a master regulator of prostate development and homeostasis. Frontline therapies for metastatic PC deprive the AR of the activating ligands testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by limiting their biosynthesis or blocking AR binding. Notably, AR signaling is dichotomous, inducing growth at lower activity levels, while suppressing growth at higher levels. Recent clinical studies have exploited this effect by administration of supraphysiological concentrations of T, resulting in clinical responses and improvements in quality of life. However, the use of T as a therapeutic agent in oncology is limited by poor drug-like properties as well as rapid and variable metabolism. Here, we investigated the antitumor effects of selective AR modulators (SARMs), which are small-molecule nonsteroidal AR agonists developed to treat muscle wasting and cachexia. Several orally administered SARMs activated the AR program in PC models. AR cistromes regulated by steroidal androgens and SARMs were superimposable. Coregulatory proteins including HOXB13 and GRHL2 comprised AR complexes assembled by both androgens and SARMs. At bioavailable concentrations, SARMs repressed MYC oncoprotein expression and inhibited the growth of castration-sensitive and castration-resistant PC in vitro and in vivo. These results support further clinical investigation of SARMs for treating advanced PC.

Selective androgen receptor modulators activate the canonical prostate cancer androgen receptor program and repress cancer growth.

Prostate cancer (PC) is driven by androgen receptor (AR) activity, a master regulator of prostate development and homeostasis. Frontline therapies for metastatic PC deprive the AR of the activating ligands testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) by limiting their biosynthesis or blocking AR binding. Notably, AR signaling is dichotomous, inducing growth at lower activity levels, while suppressing growth at higher levels. Recent clinical studies have exploited this effect by administration of supraphysiological concentrations of T, resulting in clinical responses and improvements in quality of life. However, the use of T as a therapeutic agent in oncology is limited by poor drug-like properties as well as rapid and variable metabolism. Here, we investigated the antitumor effects of selective AR modulators (SARMs), which are small-molecule nonsteroidal AR agonists developed to treat muscle wasting and cachexia. Several orally administered SARMs activated the AR program in PC models. AR cistromes regulated by steroidal androgens and SARMs were superimposable. Coregulatory proteins including HOXB13 and GRHL2 comprised AR complexes assembled by both androgens and SARMs. At bioavailable concentrations, SARMs repressed MYC oncoprotein expression and inhibited the growth of castration-sensitive and castration-resistant PC in vitro and in vivo. These results support further clinical investigation of SARMs for treating advanced PC.

Synthesis of dihydrotestosterone derivatives modified in the A-ring with (hetero)arylidene, pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine and triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidine moieties and their targeting of the androgen receptor in prostate cancer

One of the main directions of steroid research is the preparation of modified derivatives in which, in addition to changes in physicochemical properties, receptor binding is significantly altered, thus a bioactivity different from that of the parent compound predominates. In the frame of this work, 2-arylidene derivatives were first synthesized by regioselective modification of the A-ring of natural sex hormone, 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT). After Claisen-Schmidt condensations of DHT with (hetero)aromatic aldehydes in alkaline EtOH, heterocyclizations of the α,β-enones were performed with 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole, 3-aminopyrazole and 3-amino-5-methylpyrazole in the presence of t-BuOK in DMF to afford 7′-epimeric mixtures of A-ring-fused azolo-dihydropyrimidines, respectively. Depending on the electronic demand of the substituents of the arylidene moiety, spontaneous or 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyanobenzoquinone (DDQ)-induced oxidation of the heteroring led to triazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines and pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidines in good yields, while, using the Jones reagent as a strong oxidant, 17-oxidation also occurred. The crystal structures of an arylidene and a triazolopyrimidine product have been determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction and both were found to crystallize in the monoclinic crystal system at P21 space group. Most derivatives were found to diminish the transcriptional activity of androgen receptor (AR) in reporter cell line. The candidate compound (17β-hydroxy-2-(4-chloro)benzylidene-5α-androstan-3-one, 2f) showed to suppress androgen-mediated AR transactivation in a dose-dependent manner. We confirmed the cellular interaction of 2f with AR, described the binding in AR-binding cavity by the flexible docking and showed the ability of the compound to suppress the expression of AR-regulated genes in two prostate cancer cell lines.

Eighty Years of Targeting Androgen Receptor Activity in Prostate Cancer: The Fight Goes on.

Simple SummaryProstate cancer is the second most common cancer in men world-wide, with nearly 1.3 million new cases each year, and over the next twenty years the incidence and death rate are predicted to nearly double. For decades, this lethal disease has been more or less successfully treated using hormonal therapy, which has the ultimate aim of inhibiting androgen signalling. However, prostate tumours can evade such hormonal therapies in a number of different ways and therapy resistant disease, so-called castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the major clinical problem. Somewhat counterintuitively, the androgen receptor remains a key therapy target in CRPC. Here, we explain why this is the case and summarise both new hormone therapy strategies and the recent advances in knowledge of androgen receptor structure and function that underpin them.Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men in the West, other than skin cancer, accounting for over a quarter of cancer diagnoses in US men. In a seminal paper from 1941, Huggins and Hodges demonstrated that prostate tumours and metastatic disease were sensitive to the presence or absence of androgenic hormones. The first hormonal therapy for PCa was thus castration. In the subsequent eighty years, targeting the androgen signalling axis, where possible using drugs rather than surgery, has been a mainstay in the treatment of advanced and metastatic disease. Androgens signal via the androgen receptor, a ligand-activated transcription factor, which is the direct target of many such drugs. In this review we discuss the role of the androgen receptor in PCa and how the combination of structural information and functional screenings is continuing to be used for the discovery of new drug to switch off the receptor or modify its function in cancer cells.

The Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer: Effect of Structure, Ligands and Spliced Variants on Therapy.

The androgen receptor (AR) plays a predominant role in prostate cancer (PCa) pathology. It consists of an N-terminal domain (NTD), a DNA-binding domain (DBD), a hinge region (HR), and a ligand-binding domain (LBD) that binds androgens, including testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Ligand binding at the LBD promotes AR dimerization and translocation to the nucleus where the DBD binds target DNA. In PCa, AR signaling is perturbed by excessive androgen synthesis, AR amplification, mutation, or the formation of AR alternatively spliced variants (AR-V) that lack the LBD. Current therapies for advanced PCa include androgen synthesis inhibitors that suppress T and/or DHT synthesis, and AR inhibitors that prevent ligand binding at the LBD. However, AR mutations and AR-Vs render LBD-specific therapeutics ineffective. The DBD and NTD are novel targets for inhibition as both perform necessary roles in AR transcriptional activity and are less susceptible to AR alternative splicing compared to the LBD. DBD and NTD inhibition can potentially extend patient survival, improve quality of life, and overcome predominant mechanisms of resistance to current therapies. This review discusses various small molecule and other inhibitors developed against the DBD and NTD—and the current state of the available compounds in clinical development.

Mithramycin suppresses DNA damage repair via targeting androgen receptor in prostate cancer.

The dependency of prostate cancer (PCa) growth on androgen receptor (AR) signaling has been harnessed to develop first-line therapies for high-risk localized and metastatic PCa treatment. However, the occurrence of aberrant expression, mutated or splice variants of AR confers resistance to androgen ablation therapy (ADT), radiotherapy or chemotherapy in AR-positive PCa. Therapeutic strategies that effectively inhibit the expression and/or transcriptional activity of full-length AR, mutated AR and AR splice variants have remained elusive. In this study, we report that mithramycin (MTM), an antineoplastic antibiotic, suppresses cell proliferation and exhibits dual inhibitory effects on expression and transcriptional activity of AR and AR splice variants. MTM blocks AR recruitment to its genomic targets by occupying AR enhancers and causes downregulation of AR target genes, which includes key DNA repair factors in DNA damage repair (DDR). We show that MTM significantly impairs DDR and enhances the effectiveness of ionizing radiation or the radiomimetic agent Bleomycin in PCa. Thus, the combination of MTM treatment with RT or radiomimetic agents, such as bleomycin, may present a novel effective therapeutic strategy for patients with high-risk, clinically localized PCa.

Androgen receptor suppresses prostate cancer metastasis but promotes bladder cancer metastasis via differentially altering miRNA525-5p/SLPI-mediated vasculogenic mimicry formation.

Early studies suggest that the androgen receptor (AR) may play differential roles in influencing prostate cancer (PCa) and bladder cancer (BCa) metastasis, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we found that the AR might function via differentially altering vasculogenic mimicry (VM) formation to either decrease PCa metastasis or increase BCa metastasis. Mechanism dissection showed that the AR could differentially alter the expression of the VM marker SLPI through miR-525-5p to regulate SLPI; moreover, it could either increase miR-525-5p transcription in PCa or decrease it in BCa via binding to different androgen-response-elements (AREs) located at different positions in the miR-525 precursor promoter. Further, results from liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) showed that the co-factors of AR in PCa and BCa are NFIX and HDAC2, respectively. Together, these results provide the first detailed mechanism of how the AR can differentially alter PCa and BCa metastasis; thus, targeting the newly identified AR-miR-525-5p-SLPI axis may help suppress metastasis.

Prostate cancer androgen receptor splice variant 7 biomarker study - a multicentre randomised feasibility trial of biomarker-guided personalised treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer (the VARIANT trial) study protocol

IntroductionProstate cancer is the most common male cancer with one in four developing non-curable metastatic disease. Initial treatment responses to hormonal therapies are transient and further management options lie between...

Meta-Analysis of steroid-converting enzymes and related receptors in prostate cancer suggesting novel combined therapies

Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is essential for prostate cancer (PC) progression and treatment. Experiments have demonstrated that the intratumoral androgen levels are not affected by circulating androgen levels, but rather modulated by local steroid-converting enzyme activities. The expression modulation status of human steroid-converting enzymes and nuclear receptors are of great promise to identify novel therapeutic targets. Meta-analysis was performed with 9 cohorts (1093 specimens) from Gene Expression Omnibus, 16 cohorts (933 specimens) from Oncomine and the TCGA cohort (550 specimens). We found significant up regulation of 5α-reductase type 1 and type 3 in both primary and metastatic PC, together with the down regulation of AKR1C2 in primary PC, contributing to the high intratumoral DHT levels. The expression of AR in metastatic PC was up regulated, indicating the importance of AR signaling in the progression of this cancer. The down regulations of HSD11B1 and NR3C1 in primary and metastatic PC may diminish the anti-inflammation and anti-proliferation effects of glucocorticoids signaling. Furthermore, the decrease of progesterone receptor (PGR) expression in primary and metastatic PC was also observed, relieving the suppression effect of PGR on PC proliferation. The clinical evidences of the remarkable expression modulation of steroid-converting enzymes and receptors in PC may indicate novel combined treatment against this highly incident cancer.

Plasma Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer.

The therapeutic landscape of prostate cancer has expanded rapidly over the past 10 years, and there is now an even greater need to understand the biological mechanisms of resistance and to develop noninvasive biomarkers to guide treatment. The androgen receptor (AR) is known to be involved in the pathogenesis and progression of prostate cancer. Recently, highly sensitive next-generation sequencing and PCR-based methods for analyzing androgen receptor gene (AR) copy numbers (CN) and mutations in plasma were established in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with different drugs. The study of cfDNA holds great promise for improving treatment in CRPC, especially in the advanced stage of the disease. Recent findings showed the significant association of plasma AR aberrations with clinical outcome in CRPC patients treated with AR-directed therapies, whereas no association was observed in patients treated with taxanes. This suggests the potential for using plasma AR as a biomarker for selecting treatment, i.e., hormone therapy or chemotherapy, and the possibility of modulating taxane dose. In recent years, plasma AR status has also been investigated in association with novel agents, such as 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy and PARP inhibitors. This review will focus on AR testing in plasma that may have clinical utility for treatment selection in advanced prostate cancer.

ZBTB7A Mediates the Transcriptional Repression Activity of the Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer.

Loss of expression of context-specific tumor suppressors is a critical event that facilitates the development of prostate cancer. Zinc finger and BTB domain containing transcriptional repressors, such as ZBTB7A and ZBTB16, have been recently identified as tumor suppressors that play important roles in preventing prostate cancer progression. In this study, we used combined ChIP-seq and RNA-seq analyses of prostate cancer cells to identify direct ZBTB7A-repressed genes, which are enriched for transcriptional targets of E2F, and identified that the androgen receptor (AR) played a critical role in the transcriptional suppression of these E2F targets. AR recruitment of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) was required to strengthen the E2F-Rb transcriptional repression complex. In addition, ZBTB7A was rapidly recruited to the E2F-Rb binding sites by AR and negatively regulated the transcriptional activity of E2F1 on DNA replication genes. Finally, ZBTB7A suppressed the growth of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) in vitro and in vivo, and overexpression of ZBTB7A acted in synergy with high-dose testosterone treatment to effectively prevent the recurrence of CRPC. Overall, this study provides novel molecular insights of the role of ZBTB7A in CRPC cells and demonstrates globally its critical role in mediating the transcriptional repression activity of AR. SIGNIFICANCE: ZBTB7A is recruited to the E2F-Rb binding sites by AR and negatively regulates the transcriptional activity of E2F1 on DNA replication genes.

Non-nuclear AR Signaling in Prostate Cancer

Despite the key role played by androgen receptor (AR) in tumor cell aggressiveness and prostate cancer (PCa) progression, its function in the tumor microenvironment (TME) is still controversial. Increasing studies highlight the crucial role played by TME modulation in treatment outcome and tumor cell spreading. In this context, targeting specific constituents of the TME could be considered an alternative approach to classic treatments directed against cancer cells. Currently, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a routinely adopted strategy in the management of PCa, with initial success, and consecutive fail. A possible justification to this is the fact that ADT aims to target all the transcription/translation-related activities of AR, which are typical of tumor epithelial cells. Less is still known about side effects of ADT on TME. Cancer Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs), for example, express a classic AR, mostly confined in the extra-nuclear portion of the cell. In CAFs ADT exerts a plethora of non-transcriptional effects, depending by the protein partner linked to AR, leading to cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. In recent years, substantial progress in the structure-function relationships of AR, identification of its binding partners and function of protein complexes including AR have improved our knowledge of its signaling axis. Important AR non-genomic effects and lots of its cytoplasmatic binding partners have been described, pointing out a fine control of AR non-genomic pathways. Accordingly, new AR inhibitors have been designed and are currently under investigation. Prompt development of new approaches to target AR or block recruitment of its signaling effectors, or co-activators, is urgently needed. The present review takes an in-depth look at current literature, furnishing an exhaustive state-of-the-art overview of the non-genomic role of AR in PCa, with particular emphasis on its involvement in TME biology.

Reprogramming of Isocitrate Dehydrogenases Expression and Activity by the Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer.

Mutations of the isocitrate dehydrogenase genes IDH1 and IDH2, key enzymes involved in citrate metabolism, are important oncogenic events in several cancer types, including in 1%-3% of all prostate cancer cases. However, if IDH1 and other IDH isoforms are associated with prostate cancer progression, as well as the regulatory factors controlling their expression and activity, remain mostly unknown. Using publicly available datasets, we showed that prostate cancer harbors the highest IDH1 expression across the human cancer spectrum and that IDH1 expression is altered during prostate cancer progression. We showed that the androgen receptor (AR), a key oncogene in prostate cancer, controls multiple IDH isoforms in both in vitro and in vivo models, predominantly positively regulating IDH1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed the recruitment of AR at several regulatory regions of IDH1 and enzymatic assays demonstrated that AR significantly induces IDH activity. Genetic blockade of IDH1 significantly impaired prostate cancer cell proliferation, consistent with IDH1 having a key function in these cancer cells. Importantly, knockdown of IDH1 blocked the AR-mediated induction in IDH activity, indicating that AR promotes a mitochondrial to cytoplasmic reprogramming of IDH activity. Overall, our study demonstrates that IDH1 expression is associated with prostate cancer progression, that AR signaling integrates one of the first transcriptional mechanisms shown to regulate IDH1, and that AR reprograms prostate cancer cell metabolism by selectively inducing extra-mitochondrial IDH activity. IMPLICATIONS: The discovery that AR reprograms IDH activity highlights a novel metabolic reprogramming necessary for prostate cancer growth and suggests targeting IDH activity as a new therapeutic approach for prostate cancer treatment.

Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers.

Drawing on concepts from experimental biology, computer science, informatics, mathematics and statistics, systems biologists integrate data across diverse platforms and scales of time and space to create computational and mathematical models of the integrative, holistic functions of living systems. Endocrine-related cancers are well suited to study from a systems perspective because of the signaling complexities arising from the roles of growth factors, hormones and their receptors as critical regulators of cancer cell biology and from the interactions among cancer cells, normal cells and signaling molecules in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, growth factors, hormones and their receptors are often effective targets for therapeutic intervention, such as estrogen biosynthesis, estrogen receptors or HER2 in breast cancer and androgen receptors in prostate cancer. Given the complexity underlying the molecular control networks in these cancers, a simple, intuitive understanding of how endocrine-related cancers respond to therapeutic protocols has proved incomplete and unsatisfactory. Systems biology offers an alternative paradigm for understanding these cancers and their treatment. To correctly interpret the results of systems-based studies requires some knowledge of how in silico models are built, and how they are used to describe a system and to predict the effects of perturbations on system function. In this review, we provide a general perspective on the field of cancer systems biology, and we explore some of the advantages, limitations and pitfalls associated with using predictive multiscale modeling to study endocrine-related cancers.

The prognosis value of EphA3 and the androgen receptor in prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

BackgroundThis study aimed to preliminarily assess the relationship between erythropoietin‐producing hepatocellular carcinoma receptor A3 (EphA3) and androgen receptor (AR) protein expression levels and prognosis in prostate cancer (PCa) to better understand the role of EphA3 in the prognosis and progression of PCa.MaterialsWe investigated the expression of EphA3 and AR in human PCa by immunohistochemistry.ResultsEphA3 and AR were both significantly upregulated in PCa, with expression mainly localized to the nucleus. A high level of AR expression was found in 48.4% of 64 tumor samples, which was significantly more than in the adjacent tissue samples (15.6%) (P < 0.01). The percentage of samples expressing a high level of EphA3 was significantly greater in the PCa samples (54.7%) than in the adjacent tissue samples (20.3%) for the 64 tumors (P < 0.01). The high levels of EphA3 and AR expression in the PCa tissue samples were both correlated with the pathological stage, bladder and rectal invasion, distant metastasis, and preoperative PSA level (both P < 0.05). The survival time was significantly shorter in high levels of AR expression of patients. (P < 0.01). A high level of EphA3 in PCa patients suggests a poor prognosis (P < 0.05). Biochemical recurrence, distant metastasis, and the final scores of EphA3 and AR expression were significantly correlated with the prognosis of PCa (P < 0.05).ConclusionsIncreased EphA3 expression is an independent prognostic factor for a poor outcome and decreased survival in PCa.