Androgen Receptor Agonist Research Articles

Transcriptomic Analysis to Uncover the Mechanism of Radiosensitization of AR-Positive Triple Negative Breast Cancers with AR Inhibition

The androgen receptor (AR) has been shown to drive tumor growth in triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), and previous work demonstrated AR inhibition as a strategy for radiosensitization in AR-positive (AR+) TNBC. Despite its role in radioresistance, the mechanistic role of AR in response to radiation therapy (RT) remains unknown, as does the benefit of 2nd generation anti-androgens in this context. We hypothesized that all 2nd generation anti-AR therapy would radiosensitize similarly and that canonical AR transcriptional function was responsible for radioresistance in these models. Radiosensitization was assessed using 2nd generation AR antagonists (apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide) using clonogenic survival assays in MDA-MB-453, SUM185, MFM-223, and MDA-MB-231 cells at 2-6Gy. Cellular fractionation experiments were performed and quantitated to determine the location of the AR protein in cells treated with AR agonists +/- RT. RNA Seq was performed and transcriptomic approaches were used (Advaita iPathway analysis) to investigate AR-mediated effects in response to RT. Inhibition with the 2nd generation anti-androgens enzalutamide and apalutamide is sufficient to radiosensitize AR+ TNBC models (rER: 1.34-1.41); while darolutamide had no effect on radiosensitivity (rER: 0.96-1.11). Additionally, TNBC cells with low AR expression were not radiosensitized by AR inhibition with any drug (rER: 0.96-1.03). While stimulation with the synthetic androgen methyltrienolone R1881 is sufficient to induce nuclear translocation of AR in AR+ TNBC cells, AR inhibition with enzalutamide, apalutamide, or darolutamide blocked AR nuclear translocation under growth conditions with charcoal stripped serum or fetal bovine serum. When cells are treated with R1881+RT, nuclear translocation of AR was induced at similar or greater levels compared to R1881 alone in AR+ TNBC cells. Combination treatment of RT with enzalutamide in the presence of hormones reduced nuclear localization of AR (32-39% reduction) compared to RT alone. RNA-sequencing after RT identified transcriptional changes potentially regulated by AR+RT, including changes in the NHEJ pathway genes. Additionally, pathway analyses in these models demonstrated changes in the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway, among others, that may regulate RT resistance in AR+ TNBC models. Most 2nd generation anti-androgens confer radiosensitization in AR+ TNBC models with cellular localization changes of AR noted after RT. The known structural differences amongst 2nd generation anti-androgens may account for differences in radiosensitization noted. Furthermore, AR-mediated radioresistance may be due, at least in part, to downstream MAPK/ERK signaling. This work builds on the mechanistic understanding of AR-mediated radioresistance in AR+ TNBC and may expose vulnerabilities to overcome resistance to combination treatment with AR inhibition and RT.

Androgen receptor agonist and antagonist reduce response of cytokine-induced killer cells on prostate cancer cells.

Despite many advances, prostate cancer (PCa) is still the second most frequently diagnosed cancer and fifth leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide. So far, the promising field of onco-immunology has not yet provided a satisfactory treatment option for PCa. Here we show that the ex vivo expansion and activation of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells isolated from primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells induce immune-mediated apoptosis in both human PCa LNCaP and C4-2 cells. Interestingly, pretreating LNCaP and C4-2 cells with either androgen or the androgen receptor (AR) antagonist enzalutamide mediates resistance to this immunogenic attack. This is associated with a reduction of both total cell loss and apoptosis levels suggesting one possible mechanism blunting onco-immunological activity. The data also suggest that secreted factors from AR ligand-treated PCa cell suppress lymphocyte proliferation. Further, we analysed immune-mediated killing activity using conditioned media from LNCaP and C4-2 treated cells. The obtained data suggest that the conditioned media from PCa treated cells does not influence a measurable lymphocyte-mediated apoptosis. However, analysing clonal expansion of activated lymphocytes, the androgen-derived conditioned media suppresses lymphocyte proliferation/expansion suggesting inhibition of onco-immunological activity by pretreatment of PCa cells with AR ligands.

Effects of Xihuang Pills on proliferation and apoptosis of prostate cancer LNCaP cells based on AR/m TOR signaling pathway

Based on the androgen receptor(AR)/mammalian target of rapamycin(mTOR)signaling pathway, the effects of Xihuang Pills-medicated serum on the proliferation and apoptosis of prostate cancer LNCaP cells were investigated. The drug-containing serum of SD rats was prepared by intragastric administration of Xihuang Pills suspension. The effects of low-, medium-, and high-dose Xihuang Pills-containing serum on the in vitro proliferation of LNCaP cells were detected by cell counting kit-8(CCK-8). Flow cytometry was used to detect the apoptosis level of LNCaP cells after intervention with different concentrations of Xihuang Pills. Protein expression of cleaved cysteinyl aspartate-specific proteinase caspase-3(cleaved caspase-3), B-cell lymphoma-2(Bcl-2), and AR as well as the phosphorylation level of mTOR protein were detected by Western blot. The results showed that compared with the blank serum, the drug-medicated serum could blunt the activity of LNCaP cells. Low-, medium-, and high-dose Xihuang Pills-containing serum could significantly increase the cell apoptosis rate, increase the expression of cleaved caspase-3 protein, decrease the expression of Bcl-2 protein, reduce the expression of AR protein, and down-regulate the level of phosphorylated mTOR(p-mTOR). To study the effect of Xihuang Pills on the growth of LNCaP cells in vivo, different doses of Xihuang Pills were used to intervene in the subcutaneous graft model in nude mice inoculated with LNCaP cells. The expression levels of AR, mTOR, p-mTOR, Bcl-2, and cleaved caspase-3 were detected by Western blot. The results showed that the volumes of subcutaneous graft tumor in the low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose Xihuang Pills groups significantly decreased compared with that in the model group. The weight of subcutaneous transplanted tumor in each group with drug intervention was significantly lower than that in the model group. Compared with the model group, the low-dose, medium-dose, and high-dose Xihuang Pills groups showed increased cleaved caspase-3 protein expression, decreased Bcl-2 and AR protein expression, and reduced p-mTOR protein expression. Further experiments showed that AR agonist R1881 could block the anti-proliferation and pro-apoptotic effects of Xihuang Pills. The mechanism of Xihuang Pills against prostate cancer is related to the inhibition of the AR/mTOR signaling pathway, inhibition of LNCaP cell proliferation, and induction of apoptosis in cancer cells.

Putative adverse outcome pathway development based on physiological responses of female fathead minnows to model estrogen versus androgen receptor agonists

Several adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) have linked molecular initiating events like aromatase inhibition, androgen receptor (AR) agonism, and estrogen receptor (ER) antagonism to reproductive impairment in adult fish. Estrogen receptor agonists can also cause adverse reproductive effects, however, the early key events (KEs) in an AOP leading to this are mostly unknown. The primary aim of this study was to develop hypotheses regarding the potential mechanisms through which exposure to ER agonists might lead to reproductive impairment in female fish. Mature fathead minnows were exposed to 1 or 10 ng 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2)/L or 10 or 100 µg bisphenol A (BPA)/L for 14 d. The response to EE2 and BPA was contrasted with the effects of 500 ng/L of 17β-trenbolone (TRB), an AR agonist, as well as TRB combined with the low and high concentrations of EE2 or BPA tested individually. Exposure to 10 ng EE2/L, 100 µg BPA/L, TRB, or the various mixtures with TRB caused significant decreases in plasma concentrations of 17β-estradiol. Exposure to TRB alone caused a significant reduction in plasma vitellogenin (VTG), but VTG was unaffected or even increased in females exposed to EE2 or BPA alone or, in most cases, in mixtures with TRB. Over the course of the 14-d exposure, the only treatments that clearly did not affect egg production were 1 ng EE2/L and 10 µg BPA/L. Based on these results and knowledge of hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis function, we hypothesize an AOP whereby decreased production of maturation-inducing steroid leading to impaired oocyte maturation and ovulation, possibly due to negative feedback or direct inhibitory effects of membrane ER activation, could be responsible for causing adverse reproductive impacts in female fish exposed to ER agonists.

An integrated in vitro/in silico approach to assess the anti-androgenic potency of isobavachin.

Isobavachin is a dietary flavanone with multiple biological activities. Our previous research has confirmed the estrogenicity of isobavachin, and this work aims to assess the anti-androgenic potency of isobavachin by an integrated in vitro and in silico approach. Isobavachin can limit the proliferation of prostate cancer cells by inducing a distinct G1 cell-cycle arrest. In addition, isobavachin also significantly represses the transcription of androgen receptor (AR)-downstream targets such as prostate specific antigen. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that isobavachin can disrupt the nuclear translocation of AR and promote its proteasomal degradation. The results of computer simulations showed that isobavachin can stably bind to AR, and the amino acid residue Gln711 may play a critical role in AR binding of both AR agonists and antagonists. In conclusion, this work has identified isobavachin as a novel AR antagonist.

In Silico Evaluation of the Binding Energies of Androgen Receptor Agonists in Wild-Type and Mutational Models.

Anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) are substances with androgenic and anabolic characteristics. Among the many side effects of hormone therapy with AAS, the following stand out: heart problems, adrenal gland disorders, aggressive behavior, increased risk of prostate cancer, problems related to lack of libido and impotence. Such substances vary in the relationship between androgenic activity, and the activation of the androgen receptor (AR) is of fundamental importance for the singularity of the action of each AAS. In this sense, our study evaluates the aspects that comprise the interactions of testosterone agonists (TES), dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and tetrahydrogestrinone (THG) in complex with the AR. In addition, we also evaluated the impact of ligand-receptor affinity differences in a mutation model. We apply computational techniques based on density functional theory (DFT) and use, as methodology, Molecular Fractionation with Conjugate Caps (MFCC). The energetic specificities present in the interaction between the analyzed complexes attest that the highest affinity with the AR receptor is found for AR-THG, followed by AR-DHT, AR-TES and AR-T877A-DHT, respectively. Our results also show the differences and equivalences between the different agonists, in addition to evaluating the difference between the DHT ligand in complex with the wild-type and mutant receptor, presenting the main amino acid residues that involve the interaction with the ligands. The computational methodology used proves to be an operative and sophisticated choice to help in the search for pharmacological agents for various therapies that have androgen as a target.

Androgen Receptor regulates Ptpn22.

Abstract The need to rear the offspring necessitated the evolution of female’s immune system to mount stronger responses than males. One consequence of it is that major autoimmune diseases manifest in a sex biased manner with a predominance in females. However, mechanisms underlying the bias have not been clearly defined. We investigated the molecular mechanisms by which male sex hormones (androgens) regulate αβ T cell function in sex biased autoimmunity. We identified Ptpn22, a gene encoding a lymphoid-specific phosphatase that negatively regulates proximal TCR signaling events, as a direct target of a transcription factor Androgen Receptor (AR) in T cells. In T cells isolated from sham-operated or castrated mice, transcription of Ptpn22 correlated with the presence of androgens. Furthermore, stimulation of Jurkat T cells with AR agonist resulted in induction of Ptpn22 transcription only in the presence of AR. Deletion of Ptpn22 in the B6.NZM mouse model of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) led to exacerbation of autoimmunity accompanied by the loss of sexual dimorphism. We identified an androgen response element (ARE) in the 5′ UTR of Ptpn22 and found that its CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutation enhanced both in vitro and in vivo the autoreactivity of T cells in NOD/ShiLtJ mouse model of Type I Diabetes (T1D). In humans, PTPN22 R620W mutation associated with several autoimmune disorders inversely correlated with the sexual dimorphism of autoimmunity. Thus, the ‘wild-type’ common allele of PTPN22 is likely to be involved in sex bias in autoimmune conditions. NIH grant R01 AI 127411

Abstract 1498: Melanoma antigen gene A6 and androgen receptor interaction in bladder cancer

Abstract The Melanoma Antigen Gene (MAGE) protein family is a large and highly conserved group of proteins that share a common MAGE homology domain. Interestingly, several MAGE proteins are limited in expression to reproductive tissues but are aberrantly expressed in various types of human malignancies. We have recently demonstrated overexpression of MAGE family member A6 in advance-stage bladder cancer (Cancers 13:23, 5931, 2021). However, the mechanisms involved in MAGE gene overexpression and its coregulators are currently unknown. One hypothesis is that MAGEA6 and androgen receptor (AR) signaling is involved in the etiology of bladder cancer progression. In the present study, we determined the functional relationship between MAGEA6 and AR in bladder cancer. Treatment with DHT, an AR agonist, increased AR and MAGEA6 expression in UMUC3 and J82 bladder cancer cells at the protein and transcript level. On the contrary, exposure of cells to enzalutamide, an antiandrogen, resulted in simultaneous reduction of AR and MAGEA6 more prominently in UMUC3 cells, compared to J82 harboring low MAGEA6 transcript. Dual-sgRNA CRISPR/Cas9 knockout of MAGEA6 in UMUC3 and J82 cells resulted in inhibition of cell proliferation, reduced survival, and migration potential in both cell lines. An induction of S-phase and G0/G1 phase cell cycle arrest was noted in UMUC3 and J82 cells. In silico analysis showed Arg20 and Cys557 amino acid residue of AR interacts with Asp236 and Gln106 amino acid residue of MAGEA6 through hydrogen bonds. Further confirmation of physical interaction between AR and MAGEA6, performed by immunoprecipitation of AR and probed for MAGEA6 and vice versa established interaction of AR-MAGEA6 with each other which was further confirmed by mass spectrometry analysis. In conclusion, these findings confirm the oncogenic role of MAGEA6 and its physical interaction with AR may be involved in bladder cancer progression. Citation Format: Prem Prakash Kushwaha, Shiv Verma, Sanjay Gupta. Melanoma antigen gene A6 and androgen receptor interaction in bladder cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1498.

Revisiting Androgen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer.

Aberrant estrogen receptor (ER) signaling is central to the pathogenesis of many breast cancers. Like ER, the androgen receptor (AR) is a steroid nuclear receptor that is frequently expressed in breast cancer and has long been considered an attractive therapeutic target. Although androgens were historically employed in the treatment of breast cancer, this strategy has largely fallen out of favor with the advent of modern anti--estrogens, due to virilizing effects from androgens, as well as concerns that androgens could be converted to estrogens to fuel tumor growth. Recent molecular advances, however, including the development of selective androgen receptor modulators, have renewed interest in targeting the AR. Yet androgen signaling in breast cancer remains incompletely understood, and preclinical studies have yielded conflicting and sometimes contradictory evidence regarding the role of AR, resulting in clinical investigations into both AR agonists and antagonists. It is increasingly recognized that AR may very well be context-specific, with divergent actions in ER-positive versus ER-negative disease. Here, we will summarize our current understanding of AR biology and insights from recent investigations into AR-directed therapies in breast cancer.

AOP Report: Adverse Outcome Pathways for Aromatase Inhibition or Androgen Receptor Agonism Leading to Male-Biased Sex Ratio and Population Decline in Fish.

Screening and testing of potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals for ecological effects are examples of risk assessment/regulatory activities that can employ adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) to establish linkages between readily measured alterations in endocrine function and whole organism- and population-level responses. Of particular concern are processes controlled by the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal/thyroidal (HPG/T) axes. However, the availability of AOPs suitable to meet this need is currently limited in terms of species and life-stage representation relative to the diversity of endpoints influenced by HPG/T function. In our report we describe two novel AOPs that comprise a simple AOP network focused on the effects of chemicals on sex differentiation during early development in fish. The first AOP (346) documents events starting with inhibition of cytochrome P450 aromatase (CYP19), resulting in decreased availability of 17β-estradiol during gonad differentiation, which increases the occurrence of testis formation, resulting in a male-biased sex ratio and consequent population-level declines. The second AOP (376) is initiated by activation of the androgen receptor (AR), also during sexual differentiation, again resulting in a male-biased sex ratio and population-level effects. Both AOPs are strongly supported by existing physiological and toxicological evidence, including numerous fish studies with model CYP19 inhibitors and AR agonists. Accordingly, AOPs 346 and 376 provide a basis for more focused screening and testing of chemicals with the potential to affect HPG function in fish during early development. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:747-756. Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

The role of 11-oxygenated androgens in prostate cancer.

11-oxygenated androgens are a class of steroids capable of activating the androgen receptor (AR) at physiologically relevant concentrations. In view of the AR as a key driver of prostate cancer (PC), these steroids are potential drivers of disease and progression. The 11-oxygenated androgens are adrenal-derived, and persist after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), the mainstay treatment for advanced PC. Consequently, these steroids are of particular interest in the castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) setting. The principal androgen of the pathway, 11-ketotestosterone (11KT), is a potent AR agonist and the predominant circulating active androgen in CRPC patients. Additionally, several precursor steroids are present in the circulation which can be converted into active androgens by steroidogenic enzymes present in PC cells. In vitro evidence suggests that adaptations frequently observed in CRPC favour the intratumoral accumulation of 11-oxygenated androgens in particular. Still, apparent gaps in our understanding of the physiology and role of the 11-oxygenated androgens remain. In particular, in vivo and clinical evidence supporting these in vitro findings is limited. Despite recent advances, a comprehensive assessment of intratumoral concentrations has not yet been performed. The exact contribution of the 11-oxygenated androgens to CRPC progression therefore remains unclear. This review will focus on the current evidence linking the 11-oxygenated androgens to PC, will highlight current gaps in our knowledge, and will provide insight into the potential clinical importance of the 11-oxygenated androgens in the CRPC setting based on the current evidence.

Abstract P4-08-16: Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors demonstrate anti-cancer activity in preclinical treatment resistant ER+AR+ breast cancer models

Abstract Background: The Androgen Receptor (AR) is expressed in up to 90% of all ER+ breast cancers and has been associated with better patient outcome. While androgens were used at a high dose as an anticancer therapy historically, this was discontinued with the advent of Tamoxifen due to virilising effects. Non-steroidal, tissue selective AR modulators (SARMs) represent an attractive alternative, offering a targeted approach to AR activation. Recent compelling pre-clinical data has established that the AR is a tumour suppressor in ER+ breast cancers and that AR activation with a natural androgen or a SARM suppressed ER-driven tumour growth, in preclinical models of endocrine-sensitive and -resistant ER+ breast cancer. Here, we evaluate the efficacy of a SARM (enobosarm) and a natural AR ligand (dihydrotestosterone, DHT) in the context of metastatic, CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) resistant breast cancer. Methods: Enobosarm and palbociclib treatments were evaluated in vitro by colony forming assays using CDK4/6i resistant (MCF7 PalbR) and both endocrine and CDK4/6i resistant (MCF7 cTamPalbR) cell lines. Next, enobosarm or DHT and palbociclib treatment were evaluated in vivo using endocrine and CDK4/6i resistant ER+ patient derived xenograft models (PDX) and cell line xenograft models. IHC, RNA and ChIP sequencing (AR, ER, H3K27ac) were subsequently performed on the harvested tumours. Results: While in vitro and in vivo growth of CDK4/6i resistant preclinical models was inhibited by treatment with a SARM or DHT alone, growth inhibition was more potent and durable in combination with a CDK4/6i. Gene set enrichment analysis of RNA-seq data integrated with ChIP-seq data revealed upregulation of an AR gene signature associated with a better prognosis following treatment with SARM. Co-treatment with a SARM and a CDK4/6i also enhanced AR signalling compared to SARM alone indicating an interaction of the two signalling pathways. Conclusion: Our data indicates that combination treatment with an AR agonist and a CDK4/6i represents a novel therapeutic strategy for CDK4/6i resistant ER+AR+ breast cancers Citation Format: Allegra Freelander, Geraldine laven-Law, Leila Eshraghi, Nimmy Geetha, Peta Somerville, Marie Pickering, Sarah Alexandrou, C. Elizabeth Caldon, Wayne D. Tilley, Theresa E. Hickey, Elgene Lim. Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors demonstrate anti-cancer activity in preclinical treatment resistant ER+AR+ breast cancer models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-08-16.

Adrenal gland involvement in 11-ketotestosterone production analyzed using LC-MS/MS.

11-ketotestosterone (11KT), which is derived by the bioconversion of testosterone via 11β-hydroxytestosterone (11OHT), is a potent agonist of the human androgen receptor. The adrenal gland is considered an important organ in 11KT production because CYP11B1, which catalyzes testosterone to 11OHT, is expressed in the adrenal glands. The present study aimed to demonstrate adrenal gland involvement in 11KT production in prepubertal children, a topic which has not yet been addressed by any previous studies. Three, retrospective, observational studies were performed. Study 1 enrolled patients aged 8 months to 7 years with severe Kawasaki disease (KD) who were treated with mPSL pulse. Studies 2 and 3 included patients who had received a corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test, respectively. Samples were collected before and after treatment or drug administration, and serum 11KT, 11OHT, and other 11-oxygenated androgens were measured by LC-MS/MS. Steroid hormone values before and after medication were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Studies 1, 2, and 3 included twenty patients with severe KD, eight patients with a CRH stimulation test, and eight patients with an ACTH stimulation test, respectively. Study 1 demonstrated that the median (IQR) 11KT level was significantly higher before, than after, mPSL pulse (0.39 (0.28-0.47) nmol/L versus 0.064 (0.012-0.075) nmol/L; P < 0.001). Studies 2 and 3 indicated no significant difference in the median 11KT value before and after the CRH or ACTH stimulation test while the 11OHT value was significantly higher after the test. In conclusion, the mediation of 11KT production by ACTH demonstrated the importance of the adrenal glands in the synthesis of this androgen in prepubertal children.

Interlaboratory prevalidation of a new in vitro transcriptional activation assay for the screening of (anti-)androgenic activity of chemicals using the UALH-hAR cell line

We report an interlaboratory evaluation of a recently developed androgen receptor (AR) transactivation assay using the UALH-hAR reporter cell line that stably expresses the luciferase gene under the transcriptional control of androgen receptor elements (AREs) with no glucocorticoid receptor (GR) crosstalk. Herein, a two-step prevalidation study involving three laboratories was conducted to assess performance criteria of the method such as transferability as well as robustness, sensitivity, and specificity. The first step consisted in the validation of the transfer of the cell line to participant laboratories through the testing of three reference chemicals: the AR agonist dihydrotestosterone, the AR antagonist hydroxyflutamide and the glucocorticoid dexamethasone. Secondly, a blinded study was conducted by screening a selection of ten chemicals, including four AR agonists, five AR antagonists, and one non-active chemical. All test compounds yielded the same activity profiles in all laboratories. The logEC50 (agonist assay) or logIC50 (antagonist assay) were in the same range, with intra-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) of 0.1–3.4% and interlaboratory CVs of 1–4%, indicating very good within- and between-laboratory reproducibility. Our results were consistent with literature and regulatory data (OECD TG458). Overall, this interlaboratory study demonstrated that the UALH-hAR assay is transferable, produces reliable, accurate and specific (anti)androgenic activity of chemicals, and can be considered for further regulatory validation.

Comprehensive identification of gene expression fingerprints and biomarkers of sexual endocrine disruption in zebrafish embryo

Endocrine disruptors (EDs), capable of modulating the sex hormone system of an organism, can exert long-lasting negative effects on reproduction in both humans and the environment. For these reasons, the properties of EDs prevent a substance from being approved for marketing. However, regulatory testing to evaluate endocrine disruption is time-consuming, costly, and animal-intensive. Here, we combined sublethal zebrafish embryo assays with transcriptomics and proteomics for well-characterized endocrine disrupting reference compounds to identify predictive biomarkers for sexual endocrine disruption in this model. Using RNA and protein gene expression fingerprints from two different sublethal exposure concentrations, we identified specific signatures and impaired biological processes induced by ethinylestradiol, tamoxifen, methyltestosterone and flutamide 96 h post fertilization (hpf). Our study promotes vtg1 as well as cyp19a1b, fam20cl, lhb, lpin1, nr1d1, fbp1b, and agxtb as promising biomarker candidates for identifying and differentiating estrogen and androgen receptor agonism and antagonism. Evaluation of these biomarkers for pre-regulatory zebrafish embryo-based bioassays will help identify endocrine disrupting hazards of compounds at the molecular level. Such approaches additionally provide weight-of-evidence for the identification of putative EDs and may contribute significantly to a reduction in animal testing in higher tier studies.

Newly Developed Targeted Therapies Against the Androgen Receptor in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review.

Among different types of breast cancers (BC), triple-negative BC (TNBC) amounts to 15% to 20% of breast malignancies. Three principal characteristics of TNBC cells are (i) extreme aggressiveness, (ii) absence of hormones, and (iii) growth factor receptors. Due to the lack or poor expression of the estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, and progesterone receptor, TNBC is resistant to hormones and endocrine therapies. Consequently, chemotherapy is currently used as the primary approach against TNBC. Expression of androgen receptor (AR) in carcinoma cells has been observed in a subset of patients with TNBC; therefore, inhibiting androgen signaling pathways holds promise for TNBC targeting. The new AR inhibitors have opened up new therapy possibilities for BC patients carrying AR-positive TNBC cells. Our group provides a comprehensive review of the structure and function of the AR and clinical evidence for targeting the cell's nuclear receptor in TNBC. We updated AR agonists, inhibitors, and antagonists. We also presented a new era of genetic manipulating CRISPR/Cas9 and nanotechnology as state-of-the-art approaches against AR to promote the efficiency of targeted therapy in TNBC. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The lack of effective treatment for triple-negative breast cancer is a health challenge. The main disadvantages of existing treatments are their side effects, due to their nonspecific targeting. Molecular targeting of cellular receptors, such as androgen receptors, increased expression in malignant tissues, significantly improving the survival rate of breast cancer patients.

Structure-Based Study to Overcome Cross-Reactivity of Novel Androgen Receptor Inhibitors.

The mutation-driven transformation of clinical anti-androgen drugs into agonists of the human androgen receptor (AR) represents a major challenge for the treatment of prostate cancer patients. To address this challenge, we have developed a novel class of inhibitors targeting the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of the receptor, which is distanced from the androgen binding site (ABS) targeted by all conventional anti-AR drugs and prone to resistant mutations. While many members of the developed 4-(4-phenylthiazol-2-yl)morpholine series of AR-DBD inhibitors demonstrated the effective suppression of wild-type AR, a few represented by 4-(4-(3-fluoro-2-methoxyphenyl)thiazol-2-yl)morpholine (VPC14368) exhibited a partial agonistic effect toward the mutated T878A form of the receptor, implying their cross-interaction with the AR ABS. To study the molecular basis of the observed cross-reactivity, we co-crystallized the T878A mutated form of the AR ligand binding domain (LBD) with a bound VPC14368 molecule. Computational modelling revealed that helix 12 of AR undergoes a characteristic shift upon VPC14368 binding causing the agonistic behaviour. Based on the obtained structural data we then designed derivatives of VPC14368 to successfully eliminate the cross-reactivity towards the AR ABS, while maintaining significant anti-AR DBD potency.

Therapeutic Strategies to Target the Androgen Receptor.

The androgen receptor (AR) plays a key role in the maintenance of muscle and bone and the support of male sexual-related functions, as well as in the progression of prostate cancer. Accordingly, AR-targeted therapies have been developed for the treatment of related human diseases and conditions. AR agonists are an important class of drugs in the treatment of bone loss and muscle atrophy. AR antagonists have also been developed for the treatment of prostate cancer, including metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Additionally, selective AR degraders (SARDs) have been reported. More recently, heterobifunctional degrader molecules of AR have been developed, and four such compounds are now in clinical development for the treatment of human prostate cancer. This review attempts to summarize the different types of compounds designed to target AR and the current frontiers of research on this important therapeutic target.

Fluornen-9-bisphenol increases Leydig cell proliferation but inhibits maturation in pubertal male rats via interacting with androgen receptor as an antagonist and estrogen receptor α as an agonist

Fluornen-9-bisphenol (BPFL) is used as one of the alternatives for bisphenol A. However, whether BPFL has deleterious effects to the male reproductive system and the underlying mechanism remain unknown. Here, we report the effects of BPFL on Leydig cell development in male rats in puberty. Male Sprague-Dawley (28 days old) rats were dosed with 0, 10, 100, 200 mg/kg/day BPFL via gavage for 28 days. BPFL significantly decreased serum testosterone levels at 200 mg/kg while increasing serum luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone levels at 200 mg/kg. BPFL markedly increased Leydig cell number but down-regulated the expression of Cyp17a1 and its protein level in Leydig cells at 200 mg/kg. Further study showed that BPFL significantly increased Pcna and Cdk2 expression and increased Leydig cell proliferation at 200 mg/kg. BPFL treatment to immature Leydig cells isolated from 28-day-old male rats for 24 h significantly inhibited testosterone biosynthesis at 50 μM, which was completely reversed by the androgen receptor agonist 7α-methyl-nortestosterone and estrogen receptor α antagonist ICI 182,780. In conclusion, BPFL increases Leydig cell proliferation but inhibits its maturation in male rats in puberty by blocking androgen receptor and activating estrogen receptor α.

Abstract 1777: Androgen receptor (AR) agonists inhibit AR- and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer

Abstract Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed in women. About 13% of women will develop invasive breast carcinoma in their lifetime and it is estimated that about 280,000 new cases will be diagnosed in 2021. Seventy-percent of diagnosed breast cancers are estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and about 90% of the ER-positive breast cancers are androgen receptor (AR)-positive. We have previously shown that AR agonists inhibit ER-positive breast cancer growth by sequestering the pioneer-transcription factor FOXA1 from ER-cistrome. Tissue-selective AR modulators (SARMs) such as enobosarm are in clinical trials to treat ER-positive breast cancers. Since resistance is a major impediment to sutained treatment, it is important to identify new therapeutic strategies and their mechanisms of resistance. Here, we evaluated the possible mechanisms of resistance to AR agonists in ER-positive breast cancer. Description: ER-positive breast cancer cell line xenografts and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) were used as experimental models. Once tumors grew to ~100-300 mm3, mice were randomized and treated orally with vehicle or enobosarm (30 mg/kg/day). Animals were sacrificed after 4 weeks when the tumors responded to treatment and after 10 weeks once resistance developed to treatment. Tumor volumes were measured twice weekly and tumors were collected at sacrifice for further analyses. RNA-seq and ChIP-seq were performed on tumor tissues. Summary: AR agonists, enobosarm and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), inhibited the proliferation of ER-positive breast cancer cells ZR-75-1 and T47D. Transcriptome analysis revealed that AR agonists activate AR in ER-positive breast cancer cells and inhibit ER-target gene signature. AR agonists inhibited the growth of breast cancer cell line xenograft T47D and breast cancer PDXs HCI-7 that express wildtype ER, and HCI-13 and WHIM-23, two models that express Y537S mutant ER. Treatment of WHIM-23 and T47D xenograft for over ten weeks resulted in resistance and regrowth. AR agonist-sensitive and -resistant tumors were analyzed using RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, and ATAC-seq to understand the mechanism of resistance development. The results indicate that the prolonged activation of AR will result in resistance. These mechanisms of resistance can be utilized as possible therapeutic targets. Conclusion: These results suggest that the AR is a promising therapeutic target in the treatment of ER-positive breast cancer. However, resistance development is possible with AR agonists and the mechanism provides suggestions for future combination therapies. Disclosure: This work was supported by an NCI grant (CA229164 and CA229164S1 to RN) and by a DOD grant (W81XWH2110055 to RN). Citation Format: Sarah Asemota, Suriyan Ponnusamy, Thirumagal Thiyagarajan, Ramesh Narayanan. Androgen receptor (AR) agonists inhibit AR- and estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1777.