Anatomic Double-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Research Articles

No difference in osteoarthritis, but less graft failures after 5 years, comparing anatomic double-bundle to anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of knee osteoarthritis (OA) between the anatomic single-bundle (SB) and anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique after 5-year follow-up (FU). Secondary objectives were to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinical examination, activity level, functional tests and graft failures between the two groups. The study was a secondary analysis after 5-year FU of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) (Clinical Trials NCT01033188). One hundred and twenty patients between 18 and 40 years were randomized to either anatomic SB or anatomic DB reconstruction. The Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification grade ≥2 and the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) atlas criteria score ≥2 were used for defining OA. Additionally, PROMs were obtained and clinical examinations of the knees were performed. Finally, the number of patients experiencing graft failure in each group was recorded. Radiographic imaging was performed in 39 patients in the SB group and in 37 patients in the DB group. Four patients (10%) in the SB group and two (5%) in the DB group developed osteoarthritis according to the KL classification (p = 0.28). Five (13%) in the SB group and three (8%) in the DB group developed osteoarthritis according to the OARSI atlas criteria (p = 0.59; difference 5.0% [95% confidence interval, CI: -0.10 to 0.20]). There were no significant differences in the PROMs, clinical examinations, activity levels, or functional tests when comparing the two groups. Of initially 62 SB patients, 14 (23%) experienced graft failure compared to 4 (7%) of the 58 DB patients (p = 0.015; difference 0.016 [95% CI: 0.03-0.29]). At 5-year FU, there were no significant differences in the incidence of OA, PROMS, or other clinical findings comparing the anatomic DB to anatomic SB ACL reconstructed patients. There were fewer graft failures among patients treated with anatomic DB ACL reconstruction. II.

No Difference in Graft Signal Intensity on Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Clinical Outcome Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation

PurposeTo evaluate the safety of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture augmentation (SA) through clinical evaluations, monitoring of complications, and evaluation of early graft remodeling using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MethodsData of participants who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACLR using hamstring tendon autografts, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. Participants undergoing ACLR with SA were propensity-matched with those without SA. Postoperative clinical evaluations, including Lysholm and Tegner activity scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation scores, KT-1000 side-to-side difference for knee stability at a 2-year follow-up, and complications, were recorded. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated for IKDC scores. The anteromedial bundle graft was categorized into distal, middle, and proximal regions on the 6-month and 1-year postoperative MRI. The signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) of each region of interest was calculated to evaluate the graft signal intensity, which was compared between the two groups using Welch’s t-test. ResultsFifty-three participants were included in each group. No significant differences were observed between the non-SA and SA groups in the Lysholm scores (96.6 ± 6.2; 95.3 ± 5.8, P = 0.25), Tegner activity scores (4.8 ± 1.4; 5.0 ± 1.3, P = 0.49), IKDC scores (90.4 ± 10.8; 87.1 ± 12.9, P = 0.15), percentage of patients meeting the MCID (94.3%; 83.0%, P = 0.12), or postoperative KT-1000 side-to-side difference (0.9 ±1.2; 0.7 ± 1.8 mm, P = 0.56). One (1.8%) and two (3.7%) cases of re-tears occurred in the non-SA and SA groups, respectively; no other complications occurred. The postoperative SNQ measurements revealed no significant differences in signal changes in all regions of the grafts between the two groups. ConclusionsThis study confirmed no difference in graft signal intensity on MRI or clinical outcome between ACLR with and without SA at the 2-year follow-up. Level of EvidenceLevel III, retrospective, comparative study.

Femoral Tunnel Position in Anatomical Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction is not Affected by Blumensaat's Line Morphology.

The aim of this study was to reveal the influence of the morphological variations of the Blumensaat's line on anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnel position in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Fifty-three subjects undergoing anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included (29 female, 24 male; median age 27.4 years; range: 14-50 years). Using an inside-out transportal technique, the PL tunnel position was made on a line drawn vertically from the bottommost point of the lateral condyle at 90 degrees of knee flexion, spanning a distance of 5 to 8 mm, to the edge of the joint cartilage. AM tunnel position was made 2 mm distal to the PL tunnel position. Following Iriuchishima's classification, the morphology of the Blumensaat's line was classified into straight and hill (large and small) types. Femoral tunnel position was determined using the quadrant method. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare straight and hill type knees according to AM and PL femoral tunnel position.There were 18 straight and 35 hill type knees (13 small and 22 large hill). AM and PL femoral tunnel position in straight type knees were 21.7 ± 7.0 and 33.6 ± 10.5% in the shallow-deep direction, and 42.1 ± 11.1 and 72.1 ± 8.5% in the high-low direction, respectively. In hill type knees, AM and PL femoral tunnel position were 21.3 ± 5.8 and 36.9 ± 7.1% in the shallow-deep direction, and 44.6 ± 10.7 and 72.1 ± 9.7% in the high-low direction, respectively. No significant difference in AM or PL femoral tunnel position was detected between straight and hill type knees.AM and PL femoral tunnel position in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction was not affected by the morphological variations of the Blumensaat's line. Surgeons do not need to consider Blumensaat's line morphology if AM and PL femoral tunnel position is targeted at the bottommost point of the lateral condyle. This was a level of evidence III study.

Number of intra-operative cyclic knee motion required to achieve stable graft tension in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; a prospective clinical study.

Applying pretension by cyclic knee motion immediately before graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery decreases graft elongation during the postoperative course. However, the expected change in graft tension caused by cyclic knee motion remains unclear. We measured graft tension changes caused by cyclic knee motion during double-bundle ACL reconstruction. We included 39 patients undergoing primary anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstrings as graft sources, at multiple centers between February 2021 and August 2022. After securing the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundle grafts to the femoral cortex, they were initially tensioned to 40 N per bundle. After 10 cycles of knee extension and flexion motion, ranging from 0 to 90-110°, tension was re-measured and re-tensioned to 40 N if the graft tension had decreased. This was repeated thrice for 10 cycles on each graft. Every 10 cycles, we recorded graft tension changes (ΔGT) and compared the mean ΔGT in the AM and PL bundles. Furthermore, we assessed relationships between total ΔGT in each bundle, age, sex, and graft diameter. Twenty-five women and 14 men with a mean age of 27.4 ± 12.4 years were included. The mean ΔGT in AM and PL bundles after every 10 cycles were 6.6 ± 3.7 N, 3.0 ± 2.3 N, 1.4 ± 1.5 N, and 9.9 ± 3.8 N, 4.9 ± 2.6 N, and 2.5 ± 1.9 N, respectively. There were significant differences in ΔGT in both bundles after every 10 cycles (p < 0.01). ΔGT in the AM bundle was significantly lower than in the PM bundle at the same number of cycles (p < 0.01). No correlation was observed between ΔGT in either bundle and age, sex, or graft diameter. The initially applied graft tension decreased by intra-operative cyclic knee movement, and the changes in graft tension decreased after retention and repeated cycles. Three sets of 10 cycles knee motion may avoid initial tension loss of the hamstring autograft in the early phase after double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Femoral Tunnel Length in Anatomical Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Is Correlated with Body Size and Knee Morphology.

The purpose of this study was to reveal the correlation between anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnel lengths in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and body size and knee morphology. Thirty-four subjects undergoing anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included in this study. Preoperative body size (height, body weight, and body mass index) was measured. Using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), quadriceps tendon thickness and the whole anterior-posterior length of the knee were measured. Using postoperative computed tomography (CT), axial and sagittal views of the femoral condyle were evaluated. The correlation between measured intraoperative AM and PL femoral tunnel lengths, and body size and knee morphology using preoperative MRI and postoperative CT parameters was statistically analyzed. Both AM and PL femoral tunnel lengths were significantly correlated with height, body weight, posterior condylar length, and Blumensaat's line length. These results suggest that the femoral ACL tunnel length created using a transportal technique can be estimated preoperatively by measuring the subject's body size and/or the knee morphology using MRI or CT. For clinical relevance, surgeons should be careful to create femoral tunnel of sufficient length when using a transportal technique, especially in knees of subjects with smaller body size and knee morphology. Level of evidence is III.

Posteromedial Portal Technique With Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Graft for Inside-Out Revision of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Bone–patellar tendon–bone (BTB) is a graft material used in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We describe creating a femoral tunnel using an inside-out posteromedial (PM) portal technique during anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. We hypothesized that applying this femoral tunnel creation method to the revision ACL reconstruction using BTB would enable reconstruction in 1 stage. In this technique, an anteromedial, an anterolateral, and a PM portal are created to confirm the original ACL footprint and location and direction of the bone tunnel during primary reconstruction. The surgeon then drills from the PM portal, so that the femoral tunnel opening touches the posterior proximal articular cartilage margin in the ACL footprint. Even if the opening partially overlaps with the primary tunnel, it is possible to create a new tunnel with a different direction. Finally, the BTB graft is guided from the tibial tunnel to the femoral tunnel and fixed with interference screws. Intraoperative PM arthroscopic views can confirm that the femoral tunnel has been created, avoiding overlap, and that the revision ACL has been reconstructed. This procedure may be useful for 1-stage revision ACL reconstruction for reinjury after primary ACL reconstruction by other conventional procedures.

Meniscal resection increases the risk of residual knee laxity even in patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with eight strands of hamstring autografts.

To compare the midterm clinical outcomes of different meniscal surgeries in patients undergoing anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-ACLR) with eight strands of hamstring (HT8) autografts and explore the potential predictive risk factors for residual knee laxity. From 2010 to 2017, a total of 410 patients who underwent anatomic trans-tibial DB-ACLR with HT8 autografts (169 patients without meniscal surgery, 105 patients with meniscal repair, and 136 patients with meniscal resection) were included in this study. The equivalent graft diameter was introduced to make the total graft size of DB-ACLR comparable with that of single-bundle ACLR and calculated as the square root of the quadratic sum of the diameter for each bundle. Residual laxity was defined as excessive anterior tibial translation or residual pivot shift at any follow-up visit, while graft rupture was confirmed by second-look arthroscopy or magnetic resonance imaging. The mean follow-up period was 8.3 ± 2.2years. The mean equivalent graft diameter was 9.9 ± 0.7mm. Graft rupture was confirmed in 16 (3.9%) patients, while residual laxity was detected in 72 (17.6%) patients (34 [25.0%] in the meniscal resection group vs. 22 [13.0%] in the no meniscal surgery group, p = 0.021). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, high-grade preoperative knee laxity (odds ratio OR 2.04, p = 0.020), equivalent graft diameter < 9mm (OR 3.31 compared with 9-10mm, p = 0.012; OR 3.28 compared with ≥ 10mm, p = 0.019), and meniscal resection (OR 1.94 compared with no meniscal surgery, p = 0.045) were associated with residual laxity. During a midterm follow-up, meniscal resection increased the risk of residual knee laxity even in patients undergoing anatomic DB-ACLR with HT8 autografts. Increasing the hamstring graft diameter and preserving the menisci are important strategies for ACLR to restore knee stability. Level III.

Predicting the Objective and Subjective Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Machine Learning Analysis of 432 Patients

Background: Sports levels, baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and surgical procedures are correlated with the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Machine learning may be superior to conventional statistical methods in making repeatable and accurate predictions. Purpose: To identify the best-performing machine learning models for predicting the objective and subjective clinical outcomes of ACLR and to determine the most important predictors. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 432 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACLR with hamstring tendon autograft between January 2010 and February 2019 were included in the machine learning analysis. A total of 15 predictive variables and 6 outcome variables were selected to validate the logistic regression, Gaussian naïve Bayes machine, random forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), isotonically calibrated XGBoost, and sigmoid calibrated XGBoost models. For each clinical outcome, the best-performing model was determined using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), whereas the importance and direction of each predictive variable were demonstrated in a Shapley Additive Explanations summary plot. Results: The AUC and accuracy of the best-performing model, respectively, were 0.944 (excellent) and 98.6% for graft failure; 0.920 (excellent) and 91.4% for residual laxity; 0.930 (excellent) and 91.0% for failure to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Lysholm score; 0.942 (excellent) and 95.1% for failure to achieve the MCID of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score; 0.773 (fair) and 70.5% for return to preinjury sports; and 0.777 (fair) and 69.2% for return to pivoting sports. Medial meniscal resection, participation in competitive sports, and steep posterior tibial slope were top predictors of graft failure, whereas high-grade preoperative knee laxity, long follow-up period, and participation in competitive sports were top predictors of residual laxity. High preoperative Lysholm and IKDC scores were highly predictive of not achieving the MCIDs of PROMs. Young age, male sex, high preoperative IKDC score, and large graft diameter were important predictors of return to preinjury or pivoting sports. Conclusion: Machine learning analysis can provide reliable predictions for the objective and subjective clinical outcomes (graft failure, residual laxity, PROMs, and return to sports) of ACLR. Patient-specific evaluation and decision making are recommended before and after surgery.

Occurrence Rate of Cyclops Lesion After Anatomic Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Comparison Between Remnant Tissue Preservation and Resection Methods.

The occurrence rate of cyclops lesion after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with remnant tissue preservation remains unclear. The study hypotheses were as follows: (1) the occurrence rate of cyclops lesion will be comparable between the remnant-preserving and remnant-resecting ACL reconstruction methods, and (2) there will be no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the remnant-preserving and remnant-resecting procedures. This retrospective comparative study involved 177 patients who underwent unilateral anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendon autografts from 2014 to 2018 at our hospital. According to the Crain classification of ACL remnant tissue, 98 patients with remnant types I, II, or III underwent the remnant-preserving procedure (group A), and the remaining 79 patients with remnant type IV underwent the remnant-resecting procedure (group B). All patients underwent second-look arthroscopy. Patients were evaluated according to arthroscopic and clinical results at postoperative 15.2 ± 8.4 months (mean ± SD). Statistical comparisons between groups were made using the paired Student t test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. At second-look arthroscopy, the incidence of cyclops lesions was significantly higher in group B than in group A (29.1% vs 13.3%; P = .0139). Cyclops lesions were divided into 4 locations: femoral side (type 1), midsubstance (type 2), tibial side (type 3), and anterior (type 4) of the ACL graft. The ratio of the tibial-side cyclops lesion (type 3) was significantly higher in group B than in group A (P = .0354). There were no significant differences in the clinical evaluation scores between the procedures. Side-to-side anterior laxity was significantly less in group A than in group B (0.7 vs 1.6 mm; P = .0035). Concerning postoperative laceration and synovium coverage of the grafts, group A was significantly better than group B (P < .0001). In this cohort of patients undergoing double-bundle ACL reconstruction, resection of the ACL remnant was associated with a significantly higher rate of cyclops lesion formation when compared with preservation of the remnant.

Effect of a new remnant-preserving technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on MRI-based graft maturity: a comparison cohort study.

To investigate the effects of a new remnant-preserving double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) technique, focused on avoiding remnant damage and preserving continuity of remnants, on graft maturity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A total of 169 patients were divided into three groups: 41 in the preservation group, 70 in the resection group, and 58 in the absent group. In the preservation group, rather than passing the graft through the remnant tissue, the graft was reconstructed such that the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles sandwiched the remnant to avoid damage to the remnant and maintain its continuity. Based on 1-year postoperative MRI, the grafts were divided into three regions: distal, middle, and proximal. The signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of each region of interest was calculated to evaluate the signal intensity of the graft and was compared among the three groups. Additionally, to identify factors influencing graft maturity, a multiple regression analysis was performed with SNQ as the dependent variable and patient demographics, bone morphology, and surgical factors as independent variables. In a three-group comparison of mean SNQs, the distal region was 3.3 ± 3.4, 8.9 ± 8.3, and 9.0 ± 8.6 (p < 0.001), the middle region was 5.3 ± 3.7, 10.9 ± 11.1, and 11.3 ± 10.2 (p < 0.001), and the proximal region was 6.8 ± 4.5, 11.1 ± 8.8, and 11.7 ± 10.8 (p = 0.017), in order of the preservation, resection, and absent groups, respectively. That indicated that the remnant-preserving ACLR was more hypointense than ACLR with remnant resection or absent in all three regions. Multiple regression analysis showed that remnant preservation remained the relevant factor affecting SNQ of the graft at the distal and middle levels. The new remnant-preserving anatomic double-bundle ACLR had significantly better graft maturity, measured by SNQ on MRI, than the remnant resection and absent groups. The remnant procedure was the relevant factor affecting graft maturity. Level III.

Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction moderately improved tegner scores over the long-term: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To assess the effects of anatomical double-bundle (DB) versus single-bundle (SB) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in skeletally mature patients with ACL injuries. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched from inception to February 7, 2022 were screened for randomized controlled trials. The Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Checklist was used to categorize studies as anatomic. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted, with pooled results being summarized using mean difference (MD). Risk of Bias (RoB) was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool. Certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. A search of 1371 unique articles yielded eight eligible trials, representing 735 patients (360 DB, 375 SB) with mean (SD) age of 28.5 (2.86) years and follow-up of 52.1 (36.2) months. Most trials had moderate to low RoB.Overall, DB was not significantly better than SB on Lysholm scores (MD = 0.52, 95% CI, - 1.80-2.85, p = 0.66; moderate certainty) or subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores (MD = - 0.40, 95% CI, - 4.35-3.55, p = 0.84; moderate certainty). Tegner scores were significantly higher in SB than DB in the intermediate term (MD = - 0.72, 95% CI, - 1.10 to - 0.34, p = 0.0002; high certainty), while significantly higher in DB relative to SB in the long-term (MD = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.02-1.03, p = 0.04; high certainty). DB ACLreconstruction significantly improves Tegner scores relative to SB ACLreconstruction over the long-term (t ≥ 5years). Intermediate term Tegner scores favour SBreconstruction. In both durations, there was no clinically significant difference based on the pre-specified minimal clinically important difference of 1.0 point. There were also no significant differences in IKDC or Lysholm scores. Surgeons should consider anatomical DB ACLreconstruction as a result of long-term improvement in patient-reported outcomes. I.

Comparison of anterior knee laxity immediately after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Manual tensioning vs tensioning boot techniques

PurposeTensioning technique at graft fixation is one of key factors for successful outcomes in ACL reconstruction. The tensioning boot, which had two tensioners and was fixed to the tibia with a bandage, was developed for precise graft tensioning. The purpose was to compare the anterior knee laxity between the manual tensioning and the tensioning boot techniques immediately after ACL reconstruction under anesthesia in order to elucidate the effectiveness of using the tensioning boot. Methods33 patients had anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction with semitendinosus tendon graft. After grafts were fixed with EndoButton-CL on lateral femoral cortex, grafts were tied to Double Spike Plate (DSP). Each graft was pre-tensioning with 20 N (totally 40 N) at 20 degree of flexion for 3 minutes using manually-held tensioner in 11 patients and using tensioner installed to tensioning boot in the remaining 22 patients before graft fixation, and were then fixed in the same manner. Tibial displacement under 67 and 89 N of tibial anterior load was measured by KT-2000 Knee Arthrometer under anesthesia before and immediately after operation. ResultsThe anterior knee laxity in the operated knee was 4.5 ± 1.0 mm in the manual tensioning group and 2.9 ± 0.9 mm in the tensioning boot group at 89 N of anterior load, showing a significant difference. (P < .0001) The side-to-side difference in the manual tensioning group was significantly less than that in the tensioning boot group. (P = .002) ConclusionsAnterior laxity of the operated knees as well as KT side-to-side difference immediately after ACL reconstruction was larger in the tensioning boot technique than the manual tensioning technique, when the graft was fixed in the same manner. Thus, the initial tension at graft fixation with the tensioning boot can be smaller than 40 N.

A new remnant preservation technique reduces bone tunnel enlargement after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

To investigate the effect of a new remnant preservation technique with a focus on remnant continuity on postoperative femoral and tibial tunnel enlargement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). A total of 150 knees were divided into three groups: Preservation Group (Group P: 49 knees), wherein the remnant continuity remained after tunnel creation; Resection Group (Group R: 47 knees), wherein the remaining remnant was resected, and Absent Group (Group A: 54 knees), wherein the remnant had no femoral attachment before tunnel creation. In Group P, the remnant maintained continuity, and the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles were positioned anterior and posterior to the remnant, respectively. Computed tomographic scans were performed at 1week and 1year after surgery, and the cross-sectional area of each tunnel aperture was measured. Tunnel enlargement was compared among the three groups by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni test. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for tunnel enlargement in demographic and radiographic data. For femoral AM tunnels, the tunnel enlargement of Group P was significantly smaller than Groups R and A (p < 0.001), femoral PL (p < 0.001 vs. R and A), tibial AM (p < 0.001 vs. R, 0.002 vs. A), and tibial PL (p < 0.001 vs. R, 0.002 vs. A). There was no significant difference between Groups R and A. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that remnant preservation was a significant factor in reducing tunnel enlargement in the femoral AM, femoral PL, tibial AM, and tibial PL. The new remnant-preserving anatomical double-bundle ACLR, which preserves the continuity of the remnant, prevented all bone tunnel enlargement at 1year postoperatively. Level III.

Hamstring Graft Prepared With Suture Tape Is Effective in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Analysis

PurposeTo investigate the graft diameters and mechanical properties of hamstring tendons sutured using different materials and techniques.MethodsThis study used 30 fresh, frozen human cadaveric semitendinosus tendons; the free ends of 10 specimens each were sutured by 2 No. 3 braided polyester sutures with the Krackow technique (BP group), SutureTape with the Krackow technique (ST group), or SutureTape Loop with the locking SpeedWhip technique (SL group). First, the changes in graft diameter from before suturing to after suturing were investigated. Each graft was pre-tensioned to 100 N for 3 cycles and then cyclically loaded to 200 N for 200 cycles. Elongation after cyclic loading and displacement in the 200th cycle were calculated. Finally, each specimen was loaded to failure. The ultimate failure load and stiffness were analyzed. These mechanical properties were statistically analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance. The level of statistical significance was set at P < .05.ResultsIn the BP group, the changes in graft diameter were significantly larger than those in the ST and SL groups (P = .001). The elongation values after 200 cycles in the BP and ST groups were 3.1 ± 2.0 mm and 5.9 ± 3.4 mm, respectively. In the SL group, elongation (7.7 ± 3.6 mm) was significantly larger compared with that in the BP group (P = .037). In contrast, displacement in the 200th cycle was significantly smaller in the ST and SL groups compared with the BP group (P = .017). No statistically significant difference was evident for the ultimate failure loads among the 3 groups (P = .543).ConclusionsThe results of this study suggest that SutureTape may be an appropriate option for preparing the hamstring graft in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Clinical RelevanceThis biomechanical study shows the effectiveness of SutureTape in ACL graft preparation. Clinically, SutureTape may be of benefit in single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups

PurposeThe aim of this study was to verify the effects of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction for postoperative clinical scores, anterior stability and frequency of complications compared to remnant removal and cases with remnant defects. MethodsThe 105 patients who underwent anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were divided into three groups. If the remnant was a Crain I-III type, remnant-preserving bone tunnel creation was attempted. After the creation of the bone tunnel, good continuity was maintained in 34 patients (preserved group). Due to lost continuity, the remnant was resected in 26 patients (resected group). No identifiable remnant continuity remained (Crain IV) in 45 patients (absent group). The Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, anterior stability measured using the KT-1000 arthrometer at 2 years postoperatively, and frequency of complications were compared among the three groups. Univariate and multiple linear regression analysis were performed to clarify the factors affecting postoperative anterior stability. ResultsThe Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity scale, IKDC subjective score, and frequency of complications were not significantly different among the groups. The mean side-to-side difference of anterior stability was significantly better in the preserved group (0.3 ± 1.6 mm) compared to the resected group (1.6 ± 2.3 mm, p = 0.003) and absent group (1.6 mm ± 1.7, p = 0.009). The multiple linear regression analysis showed remnant preservation significantly related to postoperative anterior stability. ConclusionAlthough there were no differences in clinical scores, the ACL reconstruction with new preservation technique showed good anterior stability and no difference in the frequency of complications.

Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial\u2013Part 1: clinical outcomes

PurposeCompare clinical outcomes of anatomic single-bundle (SB) to anatomic double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). It was hypothesized that anatomic DB ACLR would result in better International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) scores and reduced anterior and rotatory laxity compared to SB ACLR.MethodsActive individuals between 14 and 50 years of age that presented within 12 months of injury were eligible to participate. Individuals with prior injury or surgery of either knee, greater than a grade 1 concomitant knee ligament injury, or ACL insertion sites less than 14 mm or greater than 18 mm were excluded. Subjects were randomized to undergo SB or DB ACLR with a 10 mm-wide quadriceps tendon autograft harvested with a patellar bone block and were followed for 24 months. The primary outcome measures included the IKDC-SKF and KT-1000 (side to side difference) and pivot shift tests. Other secondary outcomes included measures of sports activity and participation, range of motion (ROM) and re-injury.ResultsEnrollment in the study was suspended due to patellar fractures related to harvest of the patellar bone plug. At that time, 57 subjects had been randomized (29 DB) and two-year follow-up was attained from 51 (89.5%). At 24-month follow-up there were no between-group differences detected for the primary outcomes. Twenty-one (77.8%) DB’s and 20 (83.3%) SB’s reported returning to pre-injury sports 2 years after surgery (n.s) Three subjects (2 DB’s, 5.3% of total) sustained a graft rupture and 5 individuals (4 SB’s, 8.8% of total) had a subsequent meniscus injury.ConclusionsDue to the early termination of the study, there were no detectable differences in clinical outcome between anatomic SB and DB ACLR when performed with a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block in individuals with ACL insertion sites that range from 14 to 18 mm.Level of EvidenceLevel 2

Les longueurs intra-articulaires des greffons à double faisceau peuvent changer pendant la flexion du genou : mesures peropératoires lors de reconstructions anatomiques du ligament croisé antérieur

BackgroundThe lengths of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) change during knee motion during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, the actual intra-articular graft length would be affected by the bone tunnel position and tunnel creation angle during ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study was to investigate the intra-articular length change of the AMB and PLB in patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. HypothesisWe hypothesized that the PLB would show a more dynamic length change pattern than the AMB during knee flexion at ACL reconstruction. MethodsThirty-two patients (16 men and 16 women) who had isolated ACL injuries with intact menisci were investigated. Anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstructions were performed using semitendinosus tendon autografts at a mean age of 30.6 years. The graft and tunnel lengths were measured intraoperatively. Intra-articular graft lengths and length changes were calculated at 0° and 90° of knee flexion during ACL reconstruction. Intraoperative data were collected prospectively, and analyses were performed retrospectively. ResultsThe intra-articular length of the AMB at 0° of knee flexion was 28.1±5.5mm. At 90° of knee flexion, the AMB intra-articular length decreased to 25.6±4.8mm. The intra-articular length of the PLB decreased to 17.7±4.6mm at 90° of knee flexion compared to 22.0±4.2mm at 0° of knee flexion. Changes in the intra-articular graft length during knee flexion were detected more in the PLB (4.1mm) than in the AMB (2.0mm, p=0.01). DiscussionThis study demonstrated that the intra-articular length change of the PLB during knee motion was larger than that of the AMB in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstructions with semitendinosus tendon autografts and suspensory femoral fixation devices. Level of evidenceIV ; retrospective cohort study.

Sandwich-Style Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With In-Between Remnant Preservation

Various degree of remnant tissues exists following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Making use of these tissues may be helpful for the reconstructed ACL from many aspects. There are many methods of remnant preservation and use, as well as many types of combined ACL reconstruction. However, the most effective methods of remnant reuse as well as ACL reconstruction are still being pursued. We introduce an anatomical double-bundle transtibial ACL reconstruction with in-between remnant preservation technique named sandwich-style ACL reconstruction. The indication of this technique is complete ACL tear with a large volume of connectable remnant. The main tricks of this technique are proper ligation of the remnant, proper location of the anteromedial-bundle tibial tunnels, and passing the anteromedial bundle through the shallow side of the remnant. We believe the introduction of this technique will provide more options for remnant preservation and ACL reconstruction.

Anatomic Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction With Extra-articular Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Internal Brace

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with additional procedures could be necessary for patients with increased preoperative pivot shift. Double-bundle (DB) ACLR provides more footprint coverage and recreates the 2 functional anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles, which are believed to give better joint function and stability than single-bundle (SB) ACLR. Internal brace augmentation with suture tape is proposed along with tendon graft in ACLR to protect the newly reconstructed ligament during rehabilitation. Additional reconstruction with anterolateral ligament (ALL) during ACLR has shown significant reduction in the level of persistent pivot shift. In Technical Note we present a modified surgical technique of combined anatomic DB ACLR and ALLR with hamstring autograft and internal brace, using button suspensory fixation device and aperture screws. The objective of this technique is to decrease residual anterior and rotational instability after ACLR and ALLR.

Anatomic Double-Bundle Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (DBACLR) is a reasonable transition from single-bundle ACL reconstruction to obtain better clinical outcomes, and most authors believe that it can only be performed through a medial portal. However, in our clinical practice, we have found that anatomic DBACLR can be performed easily and exactly through transtibial tunnels just by positioning the tibial tunnels appropriately. Thus, we would like to introduce this anatomic double-bundle transtibial ACL reconstruction technique, in which the most critical step is to create a shallow tibial tunnel for the anteromedial bundle with a proximal projection to the anatomic location of the corresponding femoral tunnel. We believe this Technical Note will give an interesting view of anatomic DBACLR.