Analysis Of Short-term Outcomes Research Articles

Robotic and open resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparative PSB-based analysis of short-term outcomes and survival (single-center experience)

Robotic and open resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparative PSB-based analysis of short-term outcomes and survival (single-center experience)

Use of intraoperative MRI for resection of intracranial tumors: A nationwide analysis of short-term outcomes

ObjectiveRecent evidence supports the use of intraoperative MRI (iMRI) during resection of intracranial tumors due to its demonstrated efficacy and clinical benefit. Though many single-center investigations have been conducted, larger nationwide outcomes have yet to be characterized. MethodsWe used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to examine baseline characteristics and 30-day postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection with and without iMRI. Comparisons between outcomes were accomplished after propensity matching using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Welch two-sample t-tests for continuous variables. ResultsA total of 38,003 patients met inclusion criteria. Of this population, 54 (0.1%) received iMRI, while 37,949 (99.9%) did not receive iMRI. After propensity score matching, the resulting groups consisted of an iMRI group (n = 54) and a matched non-iMRI group (n = 54). Procedures involving iMRI were associated with significantly increased operation length compared to those without (p < 0.01). Length of hospital stay was higher in patients without iMRI, with this difference trending towards significance (p = 0.05) in the unmatched comparison. Patients undergoing craniotomy without iMRI had a higher rate of readmission (p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in occurrence of other adverse events between the two patient groups. ConclusionDespite increasing operative length, iMRI is not associated with higher infection rate and may have a clinical benefit associated with reducing readmissions and a trend towards reducing inpatient length of stay. Additional nationwide analyses including more iMRI patients would provide further insight into the strength of these findings.

Effects of intravenous iron therapy on mortality and hospitalization of hemodialysis patients: Aprospective cohort study in Korea.

Iron replacement therapy is necessary for anemia treatment in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease. Intravenous (IV) iron therapy is an efficient method for iron replacement. However, there are concerns regarding its considerable side effects, including increased risks of infection or major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This is a longitudinal study from a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted in the Korean end-stage renal disease population. All-cause mortality, death due to infection or MACE, hospitalization due to infection or MACE, and all adverse event of death or hospitalization due to infection or MACE were compared according to the iron replacement methods during the first 3 months of enrollment. Among 1,680 hemodialysis patients, 29.3% of patients received IV iron therapy, and 38% of patients received oral iron therapy. During the median 632 days follow-up, all-cause mortality, mortality or hospitalization due to infection or MACE, and all adverse events did not differ among iron replacement groups. There were significant differences related to the risk of all adverse events among iron replacement therapies in the log-rank test and univariate Cox regression analysis only in the prevalent dialysis patients; however, the significance was lost in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Similar results were observed in the 1-year short-term outcome analysis. High-dose IV iron did not increase adverse outcomes. All-cause mortality or all adverse events due to infection or MACE were not higher with the current clinical regimen of IV iron replacement therapy than with oral or no iron therapy in Korean hemodialysis patients.

Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy with lamina-hole approach in treatment of cervical radiculopathy: an analysis of short-term clinical outcomes

Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy with lamina-hole approach in treatment of cervical radiculopathy: an analysis of short-term clinical outcomes

Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes after surgical treatment of varicose disease with endovasal laser obliteration and short stripping

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes (within six months) after short stripping (SS) and endovenous laser obliteration (EVLO) in patients with varicose veins when analyzing ultrasound findings, postoperative complications, level of postoperative pain, clinical manifestations, and duration of rehabilitation after the intervention. Patients with varicose veins of lower extremities and insufficiency of large saphenous vein valves had either EVLO or SS with miniflebectomy. All patients were examined before surgery and then in 5 days, 10 days and in 1, 3 and 6 months after it. The patients also had clinical examination, ultrasound duplex scanning of their lower extremity veins; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) was also used for the trial. Pain was assessed during the first 10 days after the surgery using a 10-point pain assessment scale. 156 patients (177 lower extremities) were followed-up for 6 months. As the results of our study showed, endovenous laser obliteration and short stripping were equally effective in eliminating the reflux of the great saphenous vein (GSV). After 6 months of follow-up, the reflux along the medial inflow was noted in one case in SS group; partial GSV recanalization was noted in one case in EVLO group in 3 months, in 3 cases – in 6 months. Besides, despite LMH preventive doses one patient from EVLO group had EHIT II deep vein thrombosis. The obtained outcomes have demonstrated that EVLO and SS have similar effectiveness and safety. No difference has been found between these two types of treatment, except more pronounced postoperative pain and bruising in SS group. Performed care was equally safe and effective in eliminating GSV reflux, in relieving symptoms and eliminating varicose veins as well as in improving the quality of life. Long-term outcomes, especially the rate of relapses depending on the type of intervention, are to be investigated in future trials.

Postnatal outcomes and risk factor analysis for patients with prenatally diagnosed oropharyngeal masses

ObjectivesTo describe our experience treating prenatally diagnosed oropharyngeal masses in a novel, multidisciplinary collaboration. To identifying outcomes and risk factors associated with adverse postnatal outcomes. MethodsThis is a sixty-two patient case series at an academic referral center. Patients with prenatally diagnosed oropharyngeal masses were identified through a programmatic database and confirmed in the electronic health record. ResultsSixty-two patient with prenatally diagnosed oropharyngeal mass were identified, with prenatal imaging at our institution confirming this diagnosis in fifty-seven patients, short term outcomes analysis conducted on forty-four patients, and long-term outcomes analysis conducted on seventeen patients. The most common pathology was lymphatic malformations (n = 27, 47.4%), followed by teratomas (n = 22, 38.6%). The median mass volume from all available patient imaging (n = 57) was 60.54 cm3 (range 1.73–742.5 cm3). Thirteen pregnancies were interrupted, six infants expired, and thirteen cases had an unknown fetal outcome. Confirmed mortality was 6/57 patients with imaging-confirmed oropharyngeal masses (10.5%). Fourteen (56%) of the surviving patients (n = 25) were delivered by Ex Utero Intrapartum Treatment (EXIT) procedure and the median NICU stay was thirty-six days (range: 3–215 days). There was no association between airway compression/deviation/displacement, stomach size, polyhydramnios, or mass size and mortality. Seventeen patients had more than one year of follow-up (mean 5.3 ± 2.4 years). These seventeen patients underwent general anesthesia a total of ninety-two times (mean 5.4 ± 4.3) and had a total of twenty-three mass-related surgeries. The great majority of patients required an artificial airway at birth, feeding support, and speech/swallow therapy. ConclusionsOropharyngeal mass involvement of key anatomic structures—the neck, upper thorax, orbit, and ear, has a greater association with mortality than mass size. Regardless of the size and involved structures, oropharyngeal masses are associated with a high burden of intensive medical care and surgical care beginning at or before birth.

Comparing outcomes of robotic versus open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer

BackgroundThe outcomes of robot-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer, compared with open resection, have not been fully characterized.MethodsA retrospective analysis of pathologic, short-term, and long-term outcomes in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent total or tumour-specific mesorectal excision at a high-volume cancer centre between 2008 and 2017 was conducted. Outcomes after robotic and open surgery were compared on an intention-to-treat basis.ResultsOut of 1048 resections performed, 1018 patients were reviewed, with 638 who underwent robotic surgery and 380 open surgery. Robotic surgery was converted to the open approach in 17 (2.7 per cent) patients. Patients who underwent robotic surgery were younger (median 54 (range 22–91) years versus median 58 (range 18–97) years; P < 0.001), had higher tumours (median 80 (range 0–150) mm from the anal verge versus median 70 (0–150) mm; P = 0.001), and were less likely to have received neoadjuvant therapy (64 per cent versus 73 per cent; P = 0.003). For patients who underwent a robotic total mesorectal excision, the operating time was longer (median 283.5 (range 117–712) min versus median 249 (range 70–661) min; P < 0.001). However, the rate of complications was lower (29 per cent versus 45 per cent; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay was shorter (median 5 (range 1–32) days versus median 7 (range 0–137) days; P < 0.001). Median follow-up of survivors was 2.9 years. The proportion of patients with a positive circumferential resection margin did not differ between the groups, nor did the rate of local recurrence (robotic versus open: 3.7 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. 1.9 to 5.6 versus 2.8 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. 1.0 to 4.6; P = 0.400), systemic recurrence (robotic versus open: 11.7 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. 8.5 to 14.8 versus 13.0 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. 9.2 to 16.5; P = 0.300), or overall survival (robotic versus open: 97.8 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. 96.3 to 99.3 versus 93.5 per cent, 95 per cent c.i. 90.8 to 96.2; P = 0.050). The same results were documented in a subanalysis of 370 matched patients, including 185 who underwent robotic surgery and 185 open surgery, for the overall incidence of any postoperative complications, overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and systemic recurrence.ConclusionIn patients with rectal cancer who are candidates for curative resection, robotic mesorectal excision is associated with lower complication rates, shorter length of stay, and equivalent oncologic outcomes, compared with open mesorectal excision.

A Comparative Analysis of Short-term Patient Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Rectal Surgery.

The popularity of robot-assisted colorectal surgery has risen over recent years; however, patient-related advantages over laparoscopic surgery remain uncertain. The goal of this study was to compare short-term patient outcomes following robotic and laparoscopic partial or complete rectal resections. This was a retrospective cohort study. The study was conducted at 5 large tertiary care Kaiser Permanente medical centers across Southern California. There were 863 consecutive robotic and laparoscopic pelvic rectal surgeries, including low anterior resections, proctectomies with coloanal anastomosis, and abdominoperineal resections, performed between January 2010 and December 2019. Short-term patient outcomes, including postoperative length of hospital stay, emergency department returns, and 30-day readmissions, and mortality. A total of 458 surgical procedures were performed via robotic versus 405 via laparoscopic approaches. The robotic group had a higher proportion of male patients (57.4% vs 50.4%; p = 0.04) and a higher proportion of obese (27.1% vs 26.9%; p = 0.02) and overweight patients (36.9% vs 35.1%; p = 0.01). There was no difference in underlying comorbidities of diabetes or smoking, or in the rate of ileostomy creation. After adjusting for Charlson Comorbidity Index, no significant difference was found in emergency department returns between robotic and laparoscopic surgical patients ( p = 0.17). There were no significant outcome differences between the 2 groups with regards to length of stay during procedure, 30-day readmission, or death rates. This study was limited by the lack of randomization in its design, selection of patients for surgical approach, and training and familiarity with robotic rectal surgery. This study shows length of stay during the procedure and postoperative 30-day readmission rates were generally similar between robotic and laparoscopic patients. Male patients and those with a higher BMI were more likely to have been operated via a robotic method. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B857 . ANTECEDENTES:La popularidad de la cirugía colorrectal asistida por robot ha aumentado en los últimos años. Sin embargo, las ventajas relacionadas con el paciente siguen siendo inciertas sobre la cirugía laparoscópica.OBJETIVO:Nuestro objetivo era comparar los resultados de los pacientes a corto plazo después de resecciones rectales completas o parciales robóticas y laparoscópicas.DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTE:El estudio se llevó a cabo en cinco grandes centros médicos de Kaiser Permanente de atención terciaria en el sur de California.PACIENTES:Se realizaron 863 cirugías robóticas y laparoscópicas rectales pélvicas consecutivas, incluidas resecciones anteriores bajas, proctectomías con anastomosis coloanal y resecciones abdominoperineales, realizadas entre enero de 2010 y diciembre de 2019.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Resultados de los pacientes a corto plazo, incluida la duración de la estancia hospitalaria después del procedimiento, los retornos al departamento de emergencias y los reingresos y la mortalidad a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:Se realizaron un total de 458 procedimientos quirúrgicos a través del robot versus 405 con laparoscopia. El grupo robótico tuvo una mayor proporción de pacientes masculinos (57,4 vs 50,4%, p = 0,04) y una mayor proporción de pacientes obesos (27,1 vs 26,9%, p = 0,02) y con sobrepeso (36,9 vs 35,1%, p = 0,01). No hubo diferencia en las comorbilidades subyacentes de la diabetes y el tabaquismo, y en la tasa de creación de ileostomía. Después de ajustar por el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson, no se encontraron diferencias significativas en los retornos al servicio de urgencias entre los pacientes robóticos y laparoscópicos ( p = 0,17). No hubo diferencias significativas en los resultados entre los dos grupos con respecto a la duración de la estadía durante el procedimiento, las tasas de readmisión a los 30 días y las tasas de muerte.LIMITACIONES:Falta de aleatorización en el diseño del estudio, selección de pacientes para abordaje quirúrgico, capacitación y familiaridad con la cirugía rectal robótica.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio muestra la duración de la estadía durante el procedimiento y las tasas de reingreso a los 30 días después del procedimiento fueron generalmente similares entre los pacientes robóticos y laparoscópicos. Los pacientes masculinos y aquellos con un índice de masa corporal más alto tenían más probabilidades de haber sido operados mediante un método robótico. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B857 . (Traducción-Dr Yolanda Colorado ).

Nationwide trends in middle meningeal artery embolization for treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: A population-based analysis of utilization and short-term outcomes

Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization represents a promising novel treatment modality for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), yet utilization and efficacy data are limited. This study evaluates the utilization and short-term outcomes of MMA embolization for cSDH treatment in a large national inpatient registry. cSDH patients treated with MMA embolization and/or surgical evacuation (craniotomy/burr hole drainage) were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) during 2012–2018 period. Temporal trends, complications, and discharge disposition were evaluated, and propensity score matching was implemented for adjusted comparisons and to mitigate confounding by indication. Among 60,045 cSDH patients identified, 390 (0.6%) underwent MMA embolization. Embolized patients presented more with high acute illness severity subclasses in comparison with surgically evacuated patients (53% vs. 34%, p = 0.004) yet did not experience any procedure-related hemorrhagic or ischemic complications. Although discharge disposition did not differ from those surgically managed, embolized patients had longer mean hospital stays (13 vs. 8 days, p = 0.023) and accrued greater hospital charges (p < 0.001). Following propensity adjustment, length of stay and charges remained greater in the embolization cohort, yet rates of routine discharge increased appreciably (40% vs. 30%, p = 0.141) relative to surgically treated cSDH patients. The utilization of embolization increased exponentially after 2015, reaching an apex in 2018 (3.7% of treated cSDH). This population-based national assessment demonstrates exponential increases in utilization of MMA embolization for cSDH treatment in recent years. Embolized patients had uncomplicated clinical courses and similar discharge dispositions as surgical evacuation patients. Large-scale prospective trials are warranted to further assess the efficacy of this modality.

Pre-Loaded Fenestrated Thoracic Endografts for Distal Aortic Arch Pathologies: Multicentre Retrospective Analysis of Short and Mid Term Outcomes

To determine short and midterm outcomes of a pre-loaded fenestrated thoracic endograft (f-TEVAR) for exclusion of distal aortic arch pathologies. This was a multicentre, retrospective study including consecutive patients from six experienced European vascular centres undergoing f-TEVAR for distal arch pathologies. Primary endpoints included peri-operative mortality and peri-operative stroke and/or spinal cord ischaemia rates. Secondary outcomes were technical success and mid to late events, including death and re-interventions. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 26. Mid to late term events were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. One hundred and eight patients were included (mean age 68 ± 11 years, 70% men). A total of 38% (n= 42) had a prior history of aortic dissection, and 24% (n= 26) prior aortic surgery. The mean aneurysm diameter was 59 ± 12 mm and the most frequent indication for treatment was post-dissection aneurysms (n= 42, 39%). Technical success was 99% (n= 107) despite intra-operative wire entanglement occurring in 29% (n= 31). The 30 day mortality rate was 3.7% (n= 4), with a 5.6% major stroke incidence (n= 6) and 3.7% (n= 4) spinal cord ischaemia rate. Three cases of retrograde dissection occurred (two of which were fatal), all in post-type B dissecting aneurysm patients without prior aortic surgery (three of 19, 15.8%). Median follow up was 12 months (range, 1 - 26). Endoleaks were documented during follow up, with 3.5% type Ia (4/104) and 2.9% type Ib (3/104) as a result of persistent false lumen perfusion. The one, two, and three year survivals and freedom from re-intervention rates were 93.2% and 92.1%, 89.1% and 86.3%, and 84.4% and 73%, respectively. This multicentre study shows that treatment of the distal aortic arch by f-TEVAR is feasible, with promising 30 day mortality, stroke, and spinal cord ischaemia rates.

How safe is adolescent bariatric surgery? An analysis of short-term outcomes

The prevalence of childhood obesity in the U.S. has tripled over the last three decades. However, fewer than 1% of children with severe obesity undergo surgical weight loss interventions each year. All patients age 10 to 19 years old who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from 2015 through 2018 in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. The primary outcomes were mortality and overall complications. Procedural trends, readmission and reoperation rates were also examined using a multivariate regression model. Patients had a mean BMI of 47.3kg/m2 and 80.0% were either 18 or 19 years old (n=4,051). There were two reported deaths. Reoperation within 30 days occurred in 1.1% of patients, readmission in 3.5%, and complications in 1.2%. Among all readmissions, primary reasons included nausea/vomiting or nutritional depletion (41.3%) and abdominal pain (16.3%). RYGB was associated with higher odds for readmission (p=0.006) and complications (p=0.005). Higher BMI and younger age were not associated with an increased likelihood to experience poorer outcomes. The proportion of patients undergoing SG increased yearly over RYGB from 73.9% in 2015 to 84.3% in 2018. Bariatric surgery appears to be low risk for adolescents and SG has become the operation of choice. More research on early consideration of surgical therapy in adolescents with severe obesity is needed given the safety profile. III.

Clinical application of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in patients with bilioenteric anastomotic stricture with access via the jejunal loops.

ObjectiveBilioenteric anastomotic stricture is a serious complication following choledochojejunostomy. Some patients develop intrahepatic lithiasis and biliary tract infection without dilation of the intrahepatic bile duct. The present study was performed to investigate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in patients with bilioenteric anastomotic stricture with access via the jejunal loops.MethodsThe data of 10 patients (7 men and 3 women; mean age, 60.8 ± 9.7 years; age range, 51–76 years) with potential bilioenteric anastomotic stricture without dilation of the intrahepatic bile duct from January 2015 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsAll 10 patients underwent surgery, and their clinical parameters were recorded. The mean surgery time was 181.5 ± 35.4 minutes, and the mean estimated blood loss was 32.0 ± 15.5 mL. No patients developed serious complications during the perioperative period. The short-term outcome analysis at 12 months indicated that the stenosis had been effectively dilated and that the liver function had improved.ConclusionsThe results of the present study demonstrated that laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy with access via the jejunal loops is feasible in the treatment of bilioenteric anastomotic stricture and intrahepatic lithiasis.

Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision versus conventional resection for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of short-term outcomes.

Complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right-sided colon cancer (RCC) is a demanding operation, especially when performed laparoscopically. The potential impact of CME in increasing postoperative complications is still unclear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic CME compared with laparoscopic non-complete mesocolic excision (NCME) during colectomy for RCC. Data from a prospectively collected database of patients who underwent laparoscopic right and extended right colectomy at our institution between January 2008 and February 2020 were retrieved and analyzed. Short-term outcomes of patients undergoing CME and NCME were compared. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. A total of 663 consecutive patients underwent resection of RCC in the study period. Among these, 500 met the inclusion criteria and after PSM a total of 372 patients were correctly matched, 186 in each group. A similar rate of overall postoperative complications was found between the CME and NCME groups (21.5% and 18.3%, p = 0.436). No difference was found in terms of conversion rate, severe complications, reoperations, readmissions, and mortality. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was higher in the CME group (22 versus 19, p = 0.003), with a lower rate of inadequate sampling (7.0% and 15.1%, p = 0.013). Laparoscopic CME for RCC is technically feasible and safe. It does not seem to be associated with a higher rate of complications or mortality compared with the "traditional" approach, but it allows better nodal sampling.

The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Renal Function: a Retrospective Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.

Obesity and diabetes mellitus are now leading causes of chronic kidney disease. Our study investigated the effects of bariatric surgery on estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) and urinary microalbumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) in morbidly obese patients. The clinical materials for patients who underwent bariatric surgery were retrospectively analyzed with a 6-month follow-up period between January 1, 2018, and June 1, 2020. The eGFR (ml/min) was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula equation. The urinary ACR was measured during the follow-up. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2), percent weight loss (%WL), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were recorded during the follow-up. Sixty-one patients who underwent bariatric surgery-laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB; n = 22) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG; n = 39)-were included in this study. The eGFR of both groups decreased at the follow-up outpatient visits (p < 0.001), although eGFR did not differ between the two groups. Unexpectedly, the ACR increased in the first month after LSG (p < 0.01) but decreased with a descending trend with no significant difference (p > 0.05) throughout the remaining follow-up period. Interestingly, ACR showed a descending trend with no significant difference during the follow-up in the LRYGB group (p > 0.05). The SBP and DBP decreased after bariatric surgery, with no significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05). Bariatric surgery is associated with improvements in postoperative renal function 6 months following surgery. The different alterations in ACR following LSG and LRYGB procedures demonstrate the underlying mechanism.

Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open incisional hernia repair: early outcomes from the Prospective Hernia Study.

To provide a comparative analysis of short-term outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted (RAS) ventral incisional hernia (VIH) repairs that include subject-reported pain medication usage and hernia-related quality of life (QOL). Subjects were ≥ 18years old and underwent elective open, laparoscopic or RAS VIH repair without myofascial release. Perioperative clinical outcomes through 30days were analyzed as were prescription pain medication use and subject-reported responses to the HerQLes Abdominal QOL questionnaire. Observed differences in baseline characteristics were controlled using a weighted propensity score analysis to obviate potential selection bias (inverse probability of treatment weighting, IPTW). A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Three hundred and seventy-one subjects (RAS, n = 159; open, n = 130; laparoscopic, n = 82) were enrolled in the study across 17 medical institutions within the United States. Operative times were significantly different between the RAS and laparoscopic groups (126.2 vs 57.2, respectively; p < 0.001). Mean length of stay was comparable for RAS vs laparoscopic (1.4 ± 1.0 vs 1.4 ± 1.1, respectively; p = 0.623) and differed for the RAS vs open groups (1.4 ± 1.0 vs 2.0 ± 1.9, respectively; p < 0.001). Conversion rates differed between RAS and laparoscopic groups (0.6% vs 4.9%; p = 0.004). The number of subjects reporting the need to take prescription pain medication through the 2-4weeks visit differed between RAS vs open (65.2% vs 79.8%; p < 0.001) and RAS vs laparoscopic (65.2% vs 78.75%; p < 0.001). For those taking prescription pain medication, the mean number of pills taken was comparable for RAS vs open (23.3 vs 20.4; p = 0.079) and RAS vs laparoscopic (23.3 vs 23.3; p = 0.786). Times to return to normal activities and to work, complication rates and HerQLes QOL scores were comparable for the RAS vs open and RAS vs laparoscopic groups. The reoperation rate within 30days post-procedure was comparable for RAS vs laparoscopic (0.6% vs 0%; p = 0.296) and differed for RAS vs open (0.6% vs 3.1%; p = 0.038). Short-term outcomes indicate that open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted approaches are effective surgical approaches to VIH repair; however, each repair technique may demonstrate advantages in terms of clinical outcomes. Observed differences in the RAS vs laparoscopic comparison are longer operative time and lower conversion rate in the RAS group. Observed differences in the RAS vs open comparison are shorter LOS and lower reoperation rate through 30days in the RAS group. The operative time in the RAS vs open comparison is similar. The number of subjects requiring the use of prescription pain medication favored the RAS group in both comparisons; however, among subjects reporting a need for pain medication, there was no difference in the number of prescription pain medication pills taken. While the study adds to the body of evidence evaluating the open, laparoscopic, and RAS approaches, future controlled studies are needed to better understand pain and QOL outcomes related to incisional hernia repair. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02715622.

Laparoscopic Sutureless Rectopexy Using a Fixation Device for Complete Rectal Prolapse.

Background:Complete rectal prolapse (CRP) commonly affects the daily life of older people and has no established operative treatment approach. We describe our simple method of laparoscopic, sutureless rectopexy, involving rectal mobilization (along with its peritoneum bilaterally) and fixation to the sacral promontory using a fixation device. We also present an analysis of short-term outcomes in patients treated using this procedure.Materials and Methods:We retrospectively evaluated 62 patients with CRP, who underwent a laparoscopic rectopexy via tack fixation, between 2004 and 2017. The peritoneum was widely attached near the site of peritoneal reflection, as in rectal cancer surgery. The hypogastric nerve was carefully detached from the front of the sacrum. Keeping the nerve intact, we lifted and mobilized the dissected rectum cranially towards the promontory, and the rectal peritoneum was affixed to the sacrum by applying 2 to 3 fixed tacks bilaterally, using a fixation device.Results:The median age of the study group was 80 (10 to 91) years. All procedures were successful without serious intraoperative complications; only 1 patient required conversion to open surgery. Median values for operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative period of hospitalization were 177 (125 to 441) minutes, 5 (0 to 275) mL, and 7 (3 to 17) days, respectively. Only 6 (9.7%) patients experienced recurrence during the follow-up period.Conclusion:Laparoscopic tacking rectopexy performed using a fixation device for repairing CRP is a simple, safe, and sutureless procedure with no severe complications or mortality.

Cytoreductive surgery and mitomycin C hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with CO2 recirculation (HIPEC-CO2) for colorectal cancer peritoneal metastases: analysis of short-term outcomes.

Peritoneal dissemination from colorectal cancer (CRC) has long been associated with unfavorable prognosis. However, in the last decades, the combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was able to obtain up to 30% 5-year survival rate in selected centers. Despite the wide diffusion of CRS and HIPEC, until now, there are no clear recommendations on the drug of choice for HIPEC nor its technique, and safety and efficacy data of HIPEC regimens and techniques are lacking. We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 26 CRS and mitomycin C HIPEC with CO2 recirculation (HIPEC-CO2) for CRC peritoneal metastasis (PM) performed at our center. The main endpoints were morbidity, mortality, the temperature of perfusate during HIPEC and metabolic changes throughout the procedure. Morbidity was assessed by analysis of postoperative adverse events according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE version 4.0). Continuous variables of Arterial Blood Gas (ABG) analysis at three time-points were compared by the Student t test. There were no postoperative deaths. The overall grade 3-4 CTCAE complications rate at 30days was 38.4%, with ten severe adverse events occurring to six (23.0%) patients. The temperature within HIPEC perfusion maintained between 41 and 42°C in all cases and we experienced no HIPEC-related intraoperative complications. We observed a significant difference between all baseline and pre-HIPEC ABG parameters evaluated but no statistically significant differences between pre- and post-HIPEC ABG outcomes. This study shows that mitomycin C HIPEC-CO2 is feasible and has a safety profile comparable to that of other HIPEC techniques reported in the literature. Further research is needed to validate prospectively the safety and efficacy of this technique.

VATS Pleurectomy Decortication Is a Reasonable Alternative for Higher Risk Patients in the Management of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: An Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes.

Simple SummaryMalignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignancy that drastically affects a patient’s quality of life. Surgery typically entails radical resection with or without the removal of the underlying lung. In an era where minimally invasive surgery is sought after, MPM remains an anomaly. The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery as an alternative to more radical surgery in MPM. We examined short-term outcomes between the radical approaches and minimally invasive surgery and minimally invasive surgery had improved outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery can be considered in patients with MPM.Surgery is a mainstay of treatment allowing for debulking of tumor and expansion of the lung for improvement in median survival and quality of life for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Although optimal surgical technique remains open for debate—extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) vs. pleurectomy/decortication (P/D)—minimally invasive surgery (VATS-P/D) remains underutilized in the management of MPM. We examined whether VATS-P/D is a feasible alternative to EPP and P/D. We evaluated the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) from 2007–2017 to assess the short-term complications of EPP vs. P/D, including a subanalysis of open P/D vs. VATS-P/D. There were 331 patients with open surgery; 269 with P/D and 62 with EPP. There were 384 patients with P/D; 269 were open and 115 VATS. Rates of any complication were similar between EPP and P/D patients, but EPP had significantly higher rates of cardiovascular complications. After adjusting for confounders, those with a VATS approach were less likely to have any complication, compared to an open approach and significantly less likely to have a pulmonary complication. VATS-P/D remains a viable alternative to radical surgery in MPM patients allowing for improved short-term outcomes.

Abstract P38: Pooled Analysis of Long and Short Term Outcomes After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage - International Stroke Outcomes Study (INSTRUCT)

Background: Outcomes after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) have been rarely examined in large cohorts. Methods: This is an extension of the International Stroke Outcomes Study (INSTRUCT) pooling 13 ‘ideal’ stroke incidence studies (n=657 with SAH from 1993-2017, median age 56 years; 46% men). The primary outcomes were mortality and functional outcome (mRS score 3-5). Harmonized study factors included age, sex, behaviors (current smoking, alcohol intake), comorbidities (history of hypertension, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation), stroke severity (e.g. NIHSS score) and year of stroke. In the pooled dataset, we estimated predictors of mortality using Poisson regression, to estimate incidence rate ratio (IRR) at 1 month (11 studies), 1 year (12 studies) and 5 years (7 studies). Generalized equation estimates in the log-binomial family were used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for predictors of poor functional outcome at 1 month (5 studies) and 1 year (8 studies). Results: Mortality was 33% at 1 month, 43% at 1 year, and 47% at 5 years (Fig 1). Poor functional outcome was 25% at 1 month and 15% at 1 year (Fig 1). In multivariable analysis, age and stroke severity were associated with mortality at all time points, together with current smoking at 1 and 5 years, and history of hypertension at 5 years (Fig 2). Poor functional outcome was predicted by age (RR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.04) at 1 month and by age (RR 1.04; 95% CI 1.00-1.08) and stroke severity (RR 1.94; 95% CI 1.02-2.87) at 1 year. Conclusion: Risk factors that predict SAH incidence including hypertension and smoking make outcomes worse. Better management of older patients and those with severe strokes could improve outcomes after SAH.

A tailored approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: multicentre analysis of short-term outcomes and impact on oncological survival.

Abdominoperineal resection of the rectum has evolved over the last century, with few modifications until 2007, when extralevator abdominoperineal resection was introduced, which improved local disease control but resulted in a significant rise in perineal complications. We adopted a modified approach in which dissection was tailored according to magnetic resonance-defined tumour involvement. The aim of this study was to assess short-term and long-term oncological outcomes following a tailored abdominoperineal resection (APR) approach. This study was a retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases at three centres: Portsmouth NHS Trust (UK), Poole General Hospital (UK) and Champalimaud's Cancer Foundation, Portugal. The study included consecutive patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection from October 2008 until April 2018 under the supervision of the senior author. Oncological outcomes, including overall survival and disease-free survival, were used as the main outcome measures. A total of 584 patients underwent rectal cancer surgery during the study period. The APR ratio was 65/584 (11%). The median age was 66 years. Neoadjuvant treatment was administered to 74% of patients. Of the patients, 91% underwent surgery via a minimally invasive approach. The median hospital stay was 7 days. Patients were followed up for a median of 41 months. Only four patients had positive resection margins. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 64% and 62%, respectively. Our data suggest that tailored APR has similar short-term and long-term oncological outcomes compared with extralevator abdominoperineal resection but reduced perineal wound complications. We believe this approach could be a safe alternative but recommend a larger sample size to accurately assess its effectiveness.