State-of-the-art progressive damage and failure analysis (PDFA) tools for composites were developed for thermoset materials because of the prevalence of the material system within the aerospace industry and the need to address damage growth behavior of composites analytically. As the presence of thermoplastic materials has started to grow in the industry, it is necessary to be able to predict their behavior as well. However, it is unclear whether existing tools based on linear elastic fracture mechanics (LEFM) can be used to represent thermoplastics. One application area for PDFA tools is low velocity impact (LVI). This work presents two PDFA modeling methods originally validated for predicting damage of thermoset composites in low-velocity impact and evaluates their ability to model a thermoplastic material system in the same scenario. Both methods use MAT299, a continuum damage mechanics material model, to represent interlaminar damage and a cohesive tiebreak definition within LS-DYNA to represent delamination within a laminate. The results reveal that the cohesive tiebreak modeling method, while successful in modeling thermoset materials, is not currently capable of predicting the delamination response of thermoplastics. The larger strain energy release rates for the thermoplastic material in combination with a deficiency in the modeling method are believed to be the cause of the reduced delamination in the simulations. Potential routes for improving the delamination prediction in the simulations include adjusting the mode-mixity behavior, using a different cohesive approach for delamination, developing new best practices for cohesive behavior, and incorporating further non-linearity into the material model.
Read full abstract