Analgesic Request Research Articles

Effect of Ketamine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Inguinal Hernia Repair

Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric nerve block is one of the methods exercised widely to reduce postoperative pain after inguinal hernia repair. Several initiatives are ongoing to prolong the duration of postoperative analgesia by adding various adjuvants to the local anaesthetic agents in different nerve blocks. In this study ketamine has been added as an adjuvant to local anaesthetic bupivacaine in Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric nerve blocks. Our study aims to evaluate the effect of adding ketamine to local anaesthetic bupivacaine in ultrasound guided Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric nerve block in patient scheduled for inguinal hernia repair under subarachnoid block. This randomized control trial was carried out among 94 patients scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair under subarachnoid block in Dhaka Medical College Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Two nerves, Ilioinguinal and Iliohypogastric were blocked by 0.25% bupivacaine under ultrasound guidance after the completion of surgery for postoperative analgesia. The study population was divided equally into two groups having 47 patients in each. Patients of group-A was received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 2ml normal saline in the block procedure. Another group, group B patients received 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and 1mg/kg of ketamine in the same nerve block. Demographic profiles had no significant differences between two groups (p>0.05). Mean duration of the analgesia or the time of first rescue analgesic requirement were significantly higher in ketamine group (595.24±15.90 minutes) than normal saline group (226.4±20.6 minutes). (p<0.05); Postoperative total analgesic (pethidine) requirement within first 24 hours (178.3±18.3 vs. 92.3±15.3) milligrams, (p<0.05) was higher in normal saline group. Our data suggests that ketamine when used as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block prolongs the time to first analgesic request as well as decreases the analgesic requirement during postoperative period. CBMJ 2024 July: vol. 13 no. 02 P: 203-212

Optimal approach to ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks for postoperative analgesia in elective caesarean section: protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionUltrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks are commonly used for postoperative analgesia during caesarean section. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum blocks can be performed through four approaches, including lateral, posterior, anterior, and intramuscular quadratus...

Is intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine superior to bupivacaine in spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as a bupivacaine adjuvant for caesarean section can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, the time interval to the first analgesic request, the level of sedation, the incidence of adverse effects, and the fetal outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The study compared the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (group BD) to the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine alone (group B) for cesarean sections. Fourteen publications were included. Among patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section, 514 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine alone, and 533 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine. The onset of sensory and motor block was essentially the same in both groups; the time for sensory and motor block regression was significantly longer in the BD group. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values were similar in group BD when compared to group B. Postoperative VAS scores remained consistently low in Group BD compared to Group B, starting from 1 hour after surgery. The level of sedation measured at the end of the cesarean section in both groups was almost similar. No difference in terms of safety, adverse events, and neonatal outcomes was found between the two groups. Use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section significantly prolongs sensory and motor block compared to using bupivacaine alone as an adjuvant. It also improves analgesia after 1 hour with no difference in the incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse effects compared to bupivacaine alone. The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine to use remains to be ingested.

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of continuous perineural catheter, liposomal bupivacaine, and dexamethasone as an adjuvant for interscalene block in total shoulder arthroplasty: a triple-blinded randomized controlled trial

BackgroundInterscalene catheters (ISC) are considered as the gold standard for perioperative pain control after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) for interscalene blocks (ISB) or the addition of dexamethasone to ISBs have both presented as additional options for extended analgesia. We aimed to compare the efficacy of LB to a single shot ISB (SISB) with added dexamethasone to an ISC. We hypothesized that a single injection of LB or an ISB with a dexamethasone will provide non-inferior duration and quality of analgesia compared to ISC. MethodsA single centered triple blinded randomized controlled trial evaluated patients undergoing elective primary TSA. Patients were randomized to 3 groups, Group A (control): 0.5% bupivacaine 15 ml with a rescue catheter left in situ (0.125% bupivacaine infusion), Group B: 0.5% bupivacaine 14 ml with 4mg (1 ml) dexamethasone with a catheter left in situ (saline infusion), Group C: 10 ml of liposomal bupivacaine (133 mg) with 0.5% bupivacaine 5 ml, with a catheter left in situ (saline infusion). The primary outcome was the worst NRS (numeric rating scale) measured on arrival to PACU, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, and 36 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes recorded were time to first analgesic request, intraoperative opioid consumption, total inpatient opioid consumption, arm weakness, arm numbness, time of analgesia duration, time of motor recovery, sensory testing using pinprick on POD1, Q36, Q48, hand strength assessment using dynamometer POD1, Q36, Q48, PACU and hospital length of stay. ResultsWe analyzed 72 patients in 3 groups (Group A 24, group B 24, Group C 24). The pre-surgery physical function scores were similar between groups. The change in postoperative pain was not different among the three groups. All 3 groups demonstrated an increase in the postoperative values, a change that was not statistically significant between groups. Likewise, no difference in the mental function score was seen within or between groups. No differences in sleep quality or satisfaction were seen among groups (P values 0.405 and 1.00, respectively). No adverse events were reported in all groups. ConclusionsNo significant difference was demonstrated between a single injection ISB with dexamethasone, a LB injection and an ISC. Given the equivalence in analgesia provided with these three modalities, providers should carefully consider the option that best fits each patient. Thus, a single injection of LB or single injection of bupivacaine with dexamethasone provides similar analgesic efficacy compared to ISC.

A comparative study of respiratory effects of erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral plane block for women undergoing modified radical mastectomy

BackgroundInadequate acute postoperative pain control after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) can compromise pulmonary function. This work aimed to assess the postoperative pulmonary effects of a single-shot thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in female patients undergoing MRM.MethodsThis prospective, randomized comparative trial was conducted on 40 female American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) II-III, aged 18 to 50 years undergoing MRM under general anesthesia (GA). Patients were divided into two equal groups (20 in each group): Group I received ESPB and Group II received TPVB. Each group received a single shot with 20 ml volume of 0.5% bupivacaine.ResultsRespiratory function tests showed a comparable decrease in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume (FEV1) from the baseline in the two groups. Group I had a lower FEV1/FVC ratio than Group II after 6 h. Both groups were comparable regarding duration for the first postoperative analgesic request (P value = 0.088), comparable postoperative analgesic consumption (P value = 0.855), and stable hemodynamics with no reported side effects.ConclusionBoth ultrasound guided ESPB and TPVB appeared to be effective in preserving pulmonary function during the first 24 h after MRM. This is thought to be due to their pain-relieving effects, as evidenced by decreased postoperative analgesic consumption and prolonged time to postoperative analgesic request in both groups.ClinicalTrials.gov IDNCT03614091 registration date on 13/7/2018.

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Block Using Bupivacaine – Magnesium Sulphate versus Bupivacaine – Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgeries

Abstract Purpose Lumbar spine surgeries are associated with significant postoperative pain. Erector Spinae Plain Block (ESPB) is a new ultra-sound guided block technique for such surgeries . We aimed to explore the analgesic effect of adding dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to bupivacaine in ESP. Patients and Methods Fifty two patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery were randomly allocated into two groups to receive an ESP block., A total volume of 25 ml, [10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine diluted in normal saline (NS) and 2 mg/kg MgSO4 in group (MG group) and 10 mL 0.5% bupivacaine in NS with 2 μg/kg dexmedetomidine in group (DEX group)] were injected. The block was administered preoperatively before anesthesia induction. Postoperatively, hemodynamics, visual analog scale scores, the first request for analgesia, total analgesic consumption, and side effects were observed for 12 hours. Results The demographic data including age, gender, height, weight and BMI showed no difference between both groups, also, ASA classification and duration of surgeries done showed no difference between the studied groups (P > 0.05). There were no recorded complications in both groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference among both groups regarding basal, and follow up period at 15 min values of heart rate, and basal value of mean arterial pressure (P > 0.05), but for the intraoperative hemodynamic parameters including MAP and HR, both parameters decreased significantly in the group which received dexmedetomidine in comparison to the other group except follow up values at 180 and 210 min, as no significant differences were recorded among both groups (P > 0.05). Regarding postoperative pain, the visual analogue score (VAS) was used to record it postoperatively every 2 hours while we found a statistically significant difference regarding the VAS from 4 to 6 hours postoperatively as P < 0.005, but, we found no difference regarding the postoperative total consumption of nalbuphine (P < 0.005) . As for patient satisfaction in the studied groups, an anaesthesia satisfaction questionnaire was developed, validated (Kappa coefficient). Dexmedetomidine group was associated with a significant increase in satisfaction compared to MG group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Magnesium sulphate and dexmedetomidine seem to be both effective adjuvants to bupivacaine in ESP blocks for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgeries, with slightly better analgesia provided by dexmedetomidine.

Ultrasound Guided Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Pain after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Abstract Background Pain is an everyday challenge during all surgeries and it is a chief postoperative complication, so pain management is a corner stone in anesthetic practice. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy (TLH) is a minimally invasive procedure, it has certain advantages over an open abdominal hysterectomy, such as reduced pain, less incidences of wound infection, a rapid recovery, a shorter hospital stay and lower complication Aim of the Work The present study was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided ESPB done at lower thoracic transverse process level in patients undergoing TLH for postoperative analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Patients and Methods This study is as Prospective double blinded cohort study, it was performed on Patients undergoing elective Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) in the hospital of gynecology of Ain Shams university hospitals over a period of six months. Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate in the study were randomly divided into two groups using computer-generated randomized list such that group A for ESPB and group B for PCA. Results The main finding in this study was that ultrasound guided ESPB at level of thoracic process provided a good analgesic effect in patients undergoing TLH also reduced the need for rescue analgesia and the total amount of postoperative opioid consumption in comparison to PCA group, Prolonged the time to first request of analgesia (duration of analgesia), Provided early mobilization, Increase patient satisfaction in 1st 24 hour and Decrease incidence of nausea and vomiting due to decrease opioids intake. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block was found statistically efficient in reducing postoperative opioid consumption, alleviating postoperative pain scores and improving patients’ satisfaction in the first 24 hours after TLH, without associated adverse effects or complications like nausea and vomiting, nerve injury, respiratory depression and hematoma formation.

Effect of Intra-Operative Erector Spinae Plane Block on Post-Operative Consumption of Opioids after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgeries (VATS)

Abstract Background Pain is an everyday challenge during all surgeries and it is a chief postoperative complication, so pain management is a corner stone in anesthetic practice. Although VATS is less painful than an open thoracotomy, patients may still feel severe pain and restricted mobility during the first few postoperative hours. Ultrasound guided nerve block is considered a recent technique for pain management. It provides better visualization of the nerves and reduces the risk for complications e.g. unintended injury to adjacent structures. Objective to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of ultrasound guided ESPB done at lumbar transverse process level in patients undergoing VATS for postoperative analgesia. Patients and Methods The study was conducted in Ain Shams university Hospitals after approval of the ethics committee and written patients’ consent. It included a total of 30 adult patients aged 21-50 years, Scheduled for lumbar spine surgeries. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups, 15 each, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group A (n = 15): Received fentanyl 1-2 mcg/kg during induction of anesthesia and maintained by additional boluses of fentanyl.5 mcg/kg, also received ketrolac 30mg and perfelgan 1gm before extubation in addition 40 ml bupivacaine 0.25% (20ml on each side) as a single level bilateral injection for ESPB. Group B (n = 15) (the controlled group): Received only fentanyl 1- 2 mcg/kg during induction of anesthesia and maintained by additional boluses of fentanyl.5 mcg/kg, also received ketrolac 30mg and perfelgan 1gm before extubation. Results The main finding in this study was that ultrasound guided ESPB at level of thoracic process provides a good analgesic effect in patients undergoing VATS also reduced the total amount of postoperative morphine consumption in comparison to controlled group, Prolonged the time to first request of analgesia (duration of analgesia), Provided early mobilization, Increase patient satisfaction in 1st 24 hour and Decrease incidence of nausea and vomiting due to decrease opioids intake. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block reduced postoperative morphine consumption, alleviated postoperative pain scores and improved patients’ satisfaction in the first 24 hours after VATS, without associated any adverse effects or complications like nausea and vomiting, nerve injury, respiratory depression and hematoma formation. The ESPB slightly decreased the rate of PONV. This might be because the use of ESP might have decreased the use of intraoperative opioids.

Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Patient Controlled Analgesia for Postoperative Analgesia in Patient Undergoing Urologic Surgeries with Lumbar Incision

Abstract Background Pain is an everyday challenge during all surgeries and it is a chief postoperative complication, so pain management is a corner stone in anesthetic practice. Urologic surgeries with lumbar incision are usually associated with acute postoperative pain and restricted mobility. Ultrasound guided nerve block is considered a recent technique for pain management. It provides better visualization of the nerves and reduces the risk for complications e.g. unintended injury to adjacent structures. Aim of the Work The present study was designed to detect the effectiveness of ESPB for post-operative analgesia in urologic surgeries with lumbar incision and its effectiveness to decrease the use of analgesic drugs requirements compared to PCA. Patietns and Methods The study was conducted in Ain Shams university Hospitals after approval of the ethics committee and written patients‟ consent. It included a total of 60 adult patients aged 21-60 years, Scheduled for urologic surgeries with lumbar incision e.g: open nephrectomy. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups, 30 each, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group A (n = 30): will receive fentanyl 1-2 mcg/kg during induction of anesthesia and will be maintained by additional boluses of fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg, also will receive ketrolac 30mg and paracetamol 1gm before extubation in addition 40 ml bupivacaine 0.25% as a single level unilateral injection for ESPB after induction of anesthesia and before skin incision. Group B (n = 30): will receive only fentanyl 1- 2 mcg/kg during induction of anesthesia and will be maintained by additional boluses of fentanyl 0.5 mcg/kg, also will receive ketrolac 30mg and paracetamol 1gm before extubation and PCA will be started after the end of the surgery. Results The main finding in this study was that ultrasound guided ESPB at level of thoracic process provides a good analgesic effect in patients undergoing urologic surgeries with lumbar incision also reduced the total amount of postoperative morphine consumption in comparison to the PCA group, Prolonged the time to first request of analgesia (duration of analgesia), Provided early mobilization, Increase patient satisfaction in first 24 hour and Decrease incidence of nausea, vomiting and constipation due to decrease opioids intake. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided unilateral ESPB reduced postoperative morphine consumption, alleviated postoperative pain scores and improved patients‟ satisfaction in the first 24 hours after urologic Surgeries with Lumbar Incision, without associated any adverse effects or complications like nausea and vomiting, nerve injury, respiratory depression and hematoma formation. The ESPB markably decreased the rate of PONV. This might be because the use of ESPB might have decreased the use of intraoperative opioids.

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS)

Abstract Background Pain is an everyday challenge during all surgeries and it is a chief postoperative complication, so pain management is a corner stone in anesthetic practice. Ultrasound guided nerve block is considered a recent technique for pain management. It provides better visualization of the nerves and reduces the risk for complications. Aim of the Work The present study was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided Erector Spinae Plane Block done at the fifth thoracic transverse process level in patients undergoing VATS surgeries for postoperative analgesia. Patients and Methods This prospective randomized clinical study was conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals. It included a total of 60 adult patients aged 21-60 years, Scheduled for VATS surgeries. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups 30 patients each. The ESPB group (n = 30): received ESPB after induction of anaethesia, while the Control group (n = 30): received only fentanyl 1- 2 mcg/kg during induction of anesthesia and additional boluses of fentanyl.5 mcg/kg were given according to the patient’s vital data. Results The main finding in this study was that ultrasound guided ESPB provided a good analgesic effect in patients undergoing VATS surgery, it also reduced the need for rescue analgesia and the total amount of postoperative opioid consumption in comparison to controlled group, Prolonged the time to first request of analgesia, allowed early mobilization, Increase patient satisfaction in 1st 24 hour and Decrease incidence of nausea and vomiting. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block was found statistically significantly in reducing postoperative opioid consumption, alleviating postoperative pain scores and improving patients’ satisfaction in the first 24 hours after VATS surgeries, without associated adverse effects as postoperative nausea and vomiting, nerve injury, respiratory depression and hematoma formation.

Comparitive Study between the Analgesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block After inguinal hernia repair

Abstract Background Multimodal analgesia is used to control postoperative pain in inguinal hernia repair. Transversus Abdominis plane block is an effective regional anesthesia technique for postoperative analgesia in inguinal hernia repairs. The Erector Spinae plane block applied to the low thoracic region was also reported to provide effective analgesia in these surgeries. Aim and Objectives To assess and compare the analgesic efficacy of Erector Spinae plane block with that of Transversus Abdominis plane block after inguinal hernia surgeries. Subjects and Methods A prospective randomized clinical study, conducted at Ain Shams University hospitals, Cairo, Egypt on 56 patients divided into 2 groups: (Group 1) (ESP group); 28 patients received unilateral ultrasound guided ESP block, (Group2) (TAP group); 28 patients received unilateral ultrasound guided TAP block during a period of 6 months. Result There was high statistically significant difference between the studied groups as regard first analgesic request and total analgesic consumption. Conclusion ESPB is a more effective regional block technique for postoperative pain relief in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair than TAPB. In which The ESP block has a longer duration of analgesia, delays the time to first requirement for analgesia, and reduces analgesic consumption when compared with the TAP block and can be used in multimodal analgesia and opioid-sparing regimens

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine versus Intrathecal Dexamethasone as Adjuvants to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine to Prolong the Duration of Sensory Block in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries

Abstract Background Dexmedetomidine can be added to local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia to speed up the block, reduce postoperative pain, increase block duration, and reduce analgesic use. Dexamethasone is used intravenously to lessen shivering because it reduces the body's inflammatory response and tissue temperature gradient. It can also be safely injected into the cerebrospinal fluid as an adjuvant to local anesthetics to improve the quality of regional anesthesia. Intrathecal dexamethasone added to Bupivacaine increased spinal anesthetic sensory block duration without affecting onset time or consequences. Aim Comparing the onset and duration of sensory block and Analgesia and onset and duration of motor block and hemodynamic stability when intrathecal 5 mcg Dexmedetomidine added to 15mg heavy bupivacaine 0.5% to that of 4mg dexamethasone when added to 15 mg heavy bupivacaine 0.5% in patients underwent lower abdominal surgeries under spinal anesthesia. Subject and Methods This study was conducted at Faculty of Medicine; Ain-Shams University Hospitals on 50 patients. Results VAS was significantly lower in group B compared to group A at 8hr and 12hr measurements. there is a significant difference between the groups regarding sensory block duration, motor block duration, onset of sensory block, onset of motor block, time to 2 segment regression, and time to request of 1st analgesia. postoperative opioid consumption was significantly lower in group B always compared to group A. Conclusion adverse events. The current study showed that both Dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone were safe and effective as intrathecal adjuvants in lower abdominal surgeries. Both drugs resulted in comparable hemodynamic stability and incidence of

Comparative Study between Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine 0.5% in Ultrasound-Guided TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Management after Elective Cesarean Section

Abstract Background Analgesia is very important after cesarean section because it improves ambulation and enables the mother to give optimal care for the neonate in the immediate postoperative period. Opioids are widely used, but their side effects limit their application. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been proved to be a useful and safe alternative technique to provide analgesia following abdominal surgeries. Objective to compare the duration of analgesia produced by two drugs fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in TAP block under ultrasound-guidance after cesarean section in a randomized controlled trial. Patients and Methods In our study, 40 patients were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. The control group received 50 mcg of fentanyl added to bupivacaine on each side. The study group received 50 mcg of dexmedetomidine added to bupivacaine on each side. All patients received equal volumes. Our study showed that addition of a 50 mcg of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine in ultrasound-guided TAP block has statistically significant effect on the hemodynamic stability of the patients. In addition, dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of analgesia significantly, as proved by the time of request of first rescue analgesia. Moreover, in dexmedetomidine group, postoperative analgesic requirements were greatly lesser than that of fentanyl group. This makes dexmedetomidine with bupivacaine more superior than the use of fentanyl with bupivacaine. Results In our study, the total rescue analgesia consumed in 24 h postoperatively which was pethidine was less in the TAP-D group (75 ± 25.6 mg) than in the TAP-F group (112.5 ± 42.5 mg). In this study, regarding the measurement the time to the first dose of analgesic received postoperatively, there was a long duration needed in TAP-D group compared to the TAP-F (control group) with the p- value < 0.0001. The time to the first rescue analgesia in the TAP-D group was (659.7 ± 20.99 min.) and for the TAP-F group, it was (512.75 ± 18.1 min.). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine delayed the time to first rescue analgesia when added to bupivacaine in TAP block using ultrasound-guided technique and improved patients’ outcome with decrease in the total pethidine consumption and more hemodynamic stability in comparison to the addition of fentanyl to bupivacaine.

Comparative Study between Dexmedetomidine and Nitroglycerin as a Hypotensive Agent and Their Effects on Bleeding in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Abstract Background Rhino-sinusitis is commonly treated with FESS. However, there can be serious complications associated with this procedure during peri-operative period like orbital cellulitis, optic nerve injuries, meningitis, etc. Their incidence increases with excessive bleeding during surgery. So Controlled hypotension is used reducing arterial blood pressure 30-40% below its normal range. Objective Primary aim: Comparing Dexmedetomidine and Nitroglycerine for inducing controlled hypotension in patients undergoing FESS with recording total intraoperative fentanyl consumption and recording of total local vasoconstrictor used by the surgeon. Secondary aim: Assessment of time to full recovery after extubation with recording of time to first analgesic used after recovery and its total dose for the first 24 hours. Materials and Methods In this study we compare Demedetomidine and Nitroglycerine in achieving hypotensive anaesthesia. The study is conducted in Anesthesiology Department, Faculty of medicine, Ain shams University. The study period is 6 months. The sample size is 50 patients divided in two groups randomly (Group I and Group II). Each group has 25 patients. Group I received Demedetomidine. Group II received Nitroglycerine. Results we find that the mean HR was significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II at all the times of measurements. The MAP was significantly lower in Group I compared to Group II after infusion of study drugs, after induction of anesthesia, after intubation and 5 min after intubation. However, the desired MAP for intra-operative induced hypotension could be achieved in all the two groups. Also we find that intra-operative Fentanyl requirement is significantly reduced in the Dexmedetomidine group as compared to the other group. The patients in group I had a longer time to full recovery. We also observe a significant delay in the first postoperative analgesic request in group I as compared to group II. It has been shown that perioperative analgesic requirements are significantly reduced with intra-operative use of Dexmedetomidine infusion. The patients in the Dexmedetomidine group had significantly higher sedation scores compared to group II. The incidence of postoperative shivering was significantly lower in the Dexmedetomidine group. The most frequent reported side-effect with Dexmedetomidine is dry mouth, which can be easily managed. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine provided better hemodynamic stability and comparable operative field visibility to nitroglycerine during FESS. Dexmedetomidine provides an additional benefit of reducing the analgesic requirements and providing postoperative sedation.

Use of Dexmedetomidine versus Nitroglycerine to Provide Hypotensive Anesthesia in ENT Surgeries (Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery)

Abstract Background controlled (deliberate/induced) hypotension is a technique by which the arterial blood pressure is lowered in a controllable manner to reduce surgical blood loss and improve the operative field visibility. There are pharmacological and nonpharmacological techniques for inducing hypotension. The nonpharmacological methods for deliberate hypotension include positioning and positive pressure ventilation to control venous return. Aim of the Work to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine (DEX) as a hypotensive agent in comparison to nitroglycerin (NTG) in FESS regarding the bloodless field, reduction of mean arterial blood pressure, decrease inhalational anesthetic requirements (MAC), decrease perioperative opioid requirements, increase the time to first postoperative analgesic request and recovery profile and increase hemodynamics stability. Patients and Methods we conducted this study on 20 patients who were planned to perform functional endoscopic sinus surgery and were randomly distributed into 2 equal groups: 10 patients received dexamedotomidine and equal number of patients received nitroglycerine. Serial measurements of mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate were obtained and records between both groups were compared. Results There were statistically significant differences between both groups regarding heart rate as mean values of heart rate were lower among dexamedotomidine group. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding mean arterial blood pressure values at different time points during the operation. Regarding the period after stopping infusion, mean values of heart rate and blood pressure were lower among dexamedotomidine group than nitroglycerine group after 5 minutes and after 10 minutes and the differences had statistically significant differences. Regarding postoperative period, both groups were comparable regarding heart rate and blood pressure immediately postoperative. Conclusion From the results of this study, we could conclude that both Dexmedetomidine and Nitroglycerin can be effectively used in induced hypotensive anesthesia for ENT surgery as FESS. Both groups were comparable with intra operative MAP with no statistically significant differences. This study also show that Dexmedetomidine has added advantages as better haemodynamic stability than Nitroglycerin (No rebound HTN, no tachycardia). Has sedative and analgesic effect, reduce requirement of anesthetic agents and perioperative analgesia. Postoperative recovery score (Time to reach modified Aldert score more than nine significantly higher. Postoperative complication as nausea and vomiting is less.

Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block for analgesia in hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized comparative study

Background and objective The ideal regional analgesic block following hip arthroplasty is not yet defined. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block analgesia in patients subjected to hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. Patients and methods Following ethical approval, 70 participants scheduled for hip arthroplasty under subarachnoid block were included in the current prospective randomized double-blinded comparative study. They were randomly assigned into two equal groups (n=35 each): anterior QLB group and PENG group. The primary outcome was the time to the first postoperative request for analgesia. The secondary outcomes were assessment of pain during the positioning for giving spinal anesthesia, visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores during movement and at rest, the total opioid consumption during the first postoperative 24 h, motor power assessment of the hip joint, and block and opioid-related complications. Results There were no statistically significant differences between the two studied groups regarding the time to first analgesic request, pain VAS scores at rest and on movement, total morphine consumption, positing pain, hip motor recovery, and block and opioid-related adverse effects. Conclusion The anterior QLB and the PENG block provided comparable posthip arthroplasty analgesia for patients subjected to surgeries under spinal anesthesia as evidenced by the comparable pain VAS scores, duration of analgesia, and total 24 h’ morphine consumption with comparable block and opioid safety profiles.

Paravertebral vs. Epidural Analgesia for Liver Surgery (PEALS): Protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study

Background Perioperative thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is commonly used in hepatectomy patients since it is opioid-sparing. However, TEA has a high failure rate and is associated with potentially devastating complications (spinal haematoma) and the risk is increased with hepatectomy. Thus, some centres favour systemic opioid-based modalities which, in turn, are associated with inferior analgesia and well-known risks/side-effects. Hence, alternative analgesic methods are desirable. Paravertebral block (PVB) has been used in liver resection with advantages including haemodynamic stability, low failure rates, and low risk of spinal haematoma. The purpose of this pilot RCT is to compare continuous TEA (traditional standard of care is local anesthetic (LA) + opioids) with PVB (traditional standard of care is with LA without opioid) for patients undergoing hepatectomy. We hypothesise that pain outcomes will be comparable between groups, but PVB patients will require fewer perioperative vasopressors/blood products, have fewer opioid-related side effects and a shorter hospital length of stay. Methods With ethics approval, this non-inferiority, pilot RCT with a convenience sample of 50 hepatectomy patients will examine whether PVB imparts analgesia comparable to TEA but with fewer adverse effects. Primary outcomes are surrogates of analgesia for 72 h postoperatively (i.e., opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request and pain scores at rest and with coughing); Secondary outcomes are blood products/fluids administered; side effects/complications until 72 h postoperatively; length of hospital stay. The results will be used to plan a large multicentre trial comparing TEA vs. PVB in hepatectomy patients. This study has a high potential to positively impact the quality/safety of patient care. ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02909322 (09-21-2016); Available at URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT0290932

A comparative study of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine for elective lower segment caesarean section

Background: The study was to compare intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of onset of sensory block, maximum height of sensory block, total sensory duration, onset of motor block, degree of motor block and duration of motor block, quality of anesthesia. Methods: The 100 cases of ASA II undergoing elective lower segment caesarean section were taken for the study and divided into two groups. Group B patients received 2 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine intrathecally. Group R patients received 2ml of isobaric ropivacaine intrathecally. Patients were evaluated for onset and duration of sensory block, onset and duration of motor block, maximum height of sensory block, quality of anaesthesia, time to request for analgesia, hemodynamic parameters and side effects if any were studied. Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean time to onset of sensory block. Maximum sensory height attained in group B ranged between T4 and T6, where as in group R, it ranged between T2 and T6 which was clinically and statistically highly significant (p<0.001). Total duration of sensory block in group B and in group R, which is not significant (p=0.068). Mean time onset of motor block was 4min in group B and 8 min in group R, (p<0.001). Duration of motor block was 155.20±14.95 min in group B and 94.10±8.31 min group R, which is clinically and statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusions: Ropivacaine 15 mg (2 ml of 0.75% isobaric ropivacaine) provides comparable quality of sensory block but has slower onset and significantly shorter duration of motor block compared to bupivacaine.

Efficacy and safety of ketamine wound infiltration for postoperative pain management: A systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background: Postoperative pain has a huge impact to the patients, families, healthcare practitioners, and healthcare delivery. Pain management with opioid-based analgesics and blind techniques have certain limitations, and ultrasound-based regional analgesia necessitates resources and experience, but ketamine wound infiltration is innovative with few side effects. However, its effectiveness is still uncertain. Methods: A thorough search was carried out across various databases including PubMed/Medline, Cochrane, Science Direct, CINHAL, and LILACS, with no limitations on date or language. Only randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of ketamine wound infiltration for managing postoperative pain were considered for inclusion. Two authors independently conducted data extraction, and the quality of evidence was assessed using GRADEpro software. Trial sequential analysis was utilized to ascertain the conclusiveness of the findings. Results: The review showed that the first analgesic request was higher in control group as compared to Ketamine SMD=1.68 (95% CI: 0.95 to 2.41). The TSA revealed that the cumulative Z-curve crosses both alpha-spending boundaries and reaches the required information size threshold, revealing strong power for current evidence. However, the quality of evidence was moderate. Conclusion: Despite available evidences, provision of firm conclusion is less optimal with current evidence as the included studies were unpowered with low to very low quality of evidences. Registration: This systematic review protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42021268774).

A Comparative Study of Fixed-Dose Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Infusions on Intraoperative Desflurane Consumption During Bispectral Index-Guided Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Background Desflurane is an excellent but expensive volatile anesthetic agent. Dexmedetomidine and propofol may decrease intraoperative desflurane consumption. This study aimed to compare the desflurane-sparing effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgeries under bispectral index (BIS)-guided general anesthesia (GA). Methods Sixty-two adult patients, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I or II, of either sex, aged between 18 and 60 years, were randomly allocated into group D or group P. Only group D patients received an intravenous (IV) bolus of dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) over 15 minutes before induction. In both groups, GA was induced following the standard protocol with propofol infusion (0.5 mg/kg/min) until the BIS value dropped below 60. For maintenance, group D and group P patients received IV dexmedetomidine infusion (0.5 mcg/kg/h) and propofol infusion (50 mcg/kg/min), respectively. In both groups, desflurane dial concentration was adjusted between 3 and 8% to maintain the BIS within the range of 45-55. An hourly bolus of IV fentanyl (0.5 mcg/kg) and a half-hourly bolus of IV vecuronium (0.02 mg/kg) were administered. The total amount of desflurane consumed, duration of pneumoperitoneum, extra aliquots of propofol used during maintenance, number of boluses of IV atropine, fentanyl, and esmolol, time to attain Ramsay Sedation Score of 2 after extubation, time to first postoperative analgesic request at Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score ≥ 4, time to reach a Modified Aldrete Score of ≥9, and incidence of any side effects were recorded. All the data were analyzed and compared using appropriate statistical tests, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results The final data analysis was performed on 60 patients. The mean desflurane consumption was clinically higher in group P patients than in group D, but the difference was statistically insignificant (p-value > 0.05). The mean induction dose of propofol was significantly less in group D than in group P (p-value < 0.05). After extubation, the difference in time to the first analgesic request (NRS ≥ 4) between the groups was statistically significant (p-value < 0.05). Group D patients had a residual intraoperative analgesic effect. Conclusion The effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol infusions on desflurane consumption in laparoscopic surgeries are comparable, with minimal effects on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative recovery profiles.