Labor Analgesia Research Articles

Exploration of the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume with the dural puncture epidural technique for labour analgesia: a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study.

To determine the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) volume for providing effective analgesia in 90% of patients (EV90) during the first stage of labour using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique to initiate labour analgesia. We conducted a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study. We included 40 nulliparous women requiring epidural labour analgesia. We used a 25G Whitacre spinal needle to puncture the dural mater and then administered a loading dose of 12mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3μg·mL-1. Subsequently, the PIEB pump delivered boluses with an identical solution at a fixed 40-min interval, starting 1hr after epidural initiation. The bolus volume for the first patient was 7mL and was adjusted for subsequent patients according to the study protocol (bolus volume, 7-12mL). The primary endpoint was effective analgesia, indicated by no need for patient-controlled or manual boluses within 6hr after analgesia initiation or until complete cervical dilation, whichever came first. Outcome evaluators assessed the patients' pain ratings, Bromage scores, sensory blockade level, and maternal blood pressure hourly. Using the truncated Dixon and Mood method, the estimated EV90 was 9.2mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.9) whereas the isotonic regression method yielded a value of 8.8mL (95% CI, 8.6 to 9.8). None of the patients experienced a motor block. Two patients experienced hypotension without the need for vasopressors. The estimated PIEB EV90 for ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3μg·mL-1 approached 9mL when DPE was combined with a fixed 40-min interval. ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); first submitted 3 January 2023.

Epidural injection of hydromorphone for postoperative pain after episiotomy: a randomized controlled trial.

Perineal incision resulting in post-partum pain and impact on puerperal life was the focus of our study. We recruited postpartum mothers who had undergone vaginal delivery to receive labor analgesia and episiotomy with an epidural injection of 0.5mg hydromorphone to assess the therapeutic effects of postpartum analgesia. The participants were randomly allocated into two groups: the control group (Group NS) received an epidural injection of an equal amount of saline, while the study group (Group HY) received an epidural injection of 0.5mg hydromorphone. We collected relevant data from electronic medical records to compare the differences between the two groups. The intervention group demonstrated lower pain scores at 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24h compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Additionally, a higher number of patients in the control group required pain medication (7 (15.9%) compared to 2 (4.7%)). The time to first analgesia request in group NS was earlier than that in group HY (8.94 ± 1.27h compared to 16.96 ± 3.38h). The study group experienced higher rates of vomiting (P = 0.002) and itching (P < 0.001). However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of urinary retention, dyskinesia, respiratory depression, dizziness, or neonatal feeding. The epidural injection of 0.5mg hydromorphone proved to be effective in alleviating pain caused by maternal episiotomy and did not negatively affect neonatal feeding.Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/usercenter.aspx identifier: ChiCTR2200064687.

Comparative study of labour analgesia onset with injection of loading dose through epidural needle versus catheter

Comparative study of labour analgesia onset with injection of loading dose through epidural needle versus catheter

Research progress in the clinical application of inhaled anesthetic sevoflurane.

Sevoflurane has been widely used in clinical anesthesia as an inhalation anesthetic. With the development of medicine, there have been several new applications in recent years, such as daytime surgery, labor analgesia, and combined nerve block for some surgeries. Moreover, as research progresses, it has been found that it not only has potential organ protection effects but can also be used to treat severe asthma and relieve the tracheal spasm state. In addition, local administration can effectively treat vascular ulcers. We briefly review the organ protective effect of sevoflurane, its application in dental treatment, asthma treatment, vascular ulcer treatment and some new progress in clinical application.

Knowledge Perception and Utilisation of Labour Analgesia Among Antenatal Clinic Attendees in a Tertiary Centre in Makurdi, North-Central Nigeria

Abstract Background: Labour pain management forms an integral part of modern obstetric practice. Despite the availability of various forms of obstetric analgesia in Nigeria, reports indicate poor knowledge, awareness, and utilisation of labour analgesia among the obstetric population. Objective: To determine the knowledge, perception, utilisation, and factors affecting utilisation of labour analgesia among antenatal clinic attendees at the Federal Medical Centre (FMC), Makurdi. Materials and Methods: This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted among 421 consecutively consenting antenatal patients in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the FMC, Makurdi, between March 1 to July 31, 2023. Data were collected using an interviewer-guided questionnaire, analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0, and results were presented in textual form and tables. Results: About 47% (199) of the study participants perceived labour pain as the worst possible pain. Only 18.3% (77) of the study participants were knowledgeable about labour analgesia, while just 6.4% (27) of the study participants had ever used it. On multiple logistics regression, the knowledge of labour pain relief (adjusted odd’s ratio [aOR] 0.090, CI = 0.038−0.215, P &lt; 0.001) and mode of previous delivery (aOR 0.292, CI = 0.114−0.750, P &lt; 0.011) were the factors affecting the utilisation of labour analgesia among study participants. Conclusion: There is poor knowledge and utilisation of labour analgesia among antenatal patients. Incorporation of labour analgesia into existing protocols and enhancing health education on labour analgesia as part of antenatal health talks can create awareness of labour analgesia among antenatal patients.

Analysis of clinical application effects of Esketamine combining Sufentanil in labor analgesia and their impacts on postpartum depression.

To evaluate the clinical effects of Esketamine combining Sufentanil in labor analgesia and their impacts on postpartum depression. This was a retrospective study. One hundred and fifty primiparae with spontaneous labor were selected at SSL Central Hospital of Dongguan City from July 10, 2021 to May 10, 2022 as the research objects and randomly divided into two groups (each n=75). While the control group underwent epidural infusion of Sufentanil for analgesia, the study group was administered Esketamine combining Sufentanil. Compared analgesic effects, time of birth course, adverse reactions, pain intensity, scores assigned to depression and anxiety before analgesia and after delivery were made for pregnant women in both groups. The response rates of the study and control groups reached 100% and 93%, respectively, with statistically significant differences (p=0.02). The time of the first, second, and third stages of labor in the study group were all significantly lower than that of the control group; showing statistical significance (p=0.00). Regarding adverse reactions showed no statistically significant differences (p=0.44). Moreover, the study group showed noticeably lower pain intensity than those of the control group during delivery, 20 minutes and one hour after delivery; and their differences were statistically significant (p=0.00). After delivery, both the SAS and SDS of the study group were respectively lower than those of the control group, with statistically significant differences as well (p=0.00). Applying Esketamine combining Sufentanil in epidural painless delivery produces rather favorable analgesic effects, shortens the time of the birth process, and improves postpartum anxiety and depression without leading to more adverse reactions.

Response to “a standardized algorithm for assessing labor analgesia”

Response to “a standardized algorithm for assessing labor analgesia”

Regional anaesthetic techniques in 14 Slovenian obstetric units between 2013 and 2021: where are we and where are we going?

Background: The use of regional anaesthetic techniques for caesarean section and labour analgesia is necessary for quality-driven obstetric anaesthesia as required by European minimum standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments, which were issued by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy in 2020. The aim of this article is to evaluate the rate of caesarean sections performed using regional anaesthetic techniques and the rates of epidural, remifentanil-PCA, and meperidine analgesia for managing labour pain across the 14 Slovenian obstetric units, respectively. Methods: Data from the Slovenian National Perinatal Information System (NPIS) from 2013 to 2021 were analysed. Results: Spinal anaesthesia was used as a primary anaesthetic method (&gt; 50% of elective caesarean sections) in a half of Slovenian obstetric units. For emergency caesarean sections, regional anaesthetic methods (spinal and epidural) were used in &gt; 50% parturients in 3 obstetric units. Eight obstetric units had an epidural rate of &gt;10%. The use of epidural analgesia has progressively increased in 9 of 14 obstetric units. Remifentanil has been routinely used in 6 obstetric units. Accordingly, the consumption of meperidine has dropped in all but one obstetric unit in Slovenia. Conclusion: In the past decade, considerable progress has been observed in obstetric anaesthesia practice in Slovenia. This is evident from the increased use of regional anaesthesia for caesarean section and labour analgesia. However, there are considerable discrepancies in anaesthetic practices between different obstetric units in Slovenia, a situation the parturients should be informed of well in advance to be able to choose the obstetric unit according to their labour and delivery preferences. In order to avoid the differences in the quality and accessibility of anaesthetic practice between units, it is necessary to increase the number of anaesthesiologists involved in obstetric anaesthesia to ensure 24/7 service of labour analgesia to be able to fulfill minimum European standards for obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia departments.

Insights into obstetric anesthesia practices: a quantitative survey among physicians across Arab countries

BackgroundObstetric anesthesia guidelines are essential for standardizing obstetric anesthesia practices globally and ensuring high-quality patient care. However, practices may vary across different settings, and there are limited data from Arab countries. This study aims to gain insights into obstetric anesthesia practices in several major hospitals across Arab countries.MethodsA questionnaire was emailed to 85 obstetric anesthesiologists/anesthesia chairpersons in major hospitals, including academic medical institutions and central hospitals, across 11/22 Arab countries. This survey gathered data on key structural and process-related obstetric anesthesia indicators.ResultsOut of 85 contacted, we had 56 responses (65.8%), with 41 being fully completed, providing insights into obstetric anesthesia indicators. Regarding structure: 31 (76%) hospitals had an operating room adjacent to the delivery room, all had intensive care units, and 22 (54%) had a lead obstetric anesthesiologist. For equipment, 19 (46%) had a video laryngoscope in the delivery suite, and 20 (49%) occasionally used ultrasound for epidurals. Regarding process: 33 (81%) held regular meetings, and 21 (51%) conducted research. Before epidural and spinal procedures, 26 (63%) and 28 (68%) required coagulation studies for patients without a history of hemorrhagic complications, while 38 (93%) and 36 (88%) mandated a platelet count, respectively. For labor analgesia, 34 (83%) primarily used epidurals, and 15 (37%) placed preemptive catheters in high-risk pregnancies. For cesarean delivery, 40 (98%) used spinals, with 16 (39%) using intrathecal morphine and 22 (54%) administering aspiration prophylaxis before general anesthesia. Regarding spinal-induced hypotension, 6 (15%) used prophylactic phenylephrine infusion.ConclusionThis survey highlights variations in obstetric anesthesia practices among various major hospitals in several Arab countries, compared to international recommendations. It emphasizes the need for obstetric anesthesia registries in the Arab world for future research. Further studies are required to outline country-specific practices, improve resource allocation, and enhance obstetric population safety and satisfaction.

Gonadotropins combined with and without 100mg Clomiphene Citrate drug on ovulation induction and role of epidural analgesia in pregnancy outcome of infertility women.

Successful ovulation induction can overcome the common condition of infertility associated with ovulatory dysfunction. Monotherapy of clomiphene citrate (CC) or combined with gonadotrophins are the best treatment modalities for ovulation induction with a successful outcome. We concentrated on evaluating the effects of 100 mg Clomiphene Citrate, both with and without gonadotrophins, on ovulation induction and the outcome of labor analgesia in women with infertility. This prospective cohort consists of 136 women with infertility who were medicated with 100 mg of clomiphene citrate alone and 100 mg of clomiphene citrate with gonadotropins. We recorded the endometrial thickness, details of the dominant follicle, and the incidence of a positive pregnancy rate. Women with positive pregnancy were managed with epidural labor with labor analgesia to relieve labor pain and evaluated the foetal outcome. In CC alone, the ovulation rate was 57%, while in CC with gonadotrophins, it was 81%. The mean dominant follicle size and endometrial thickness were high in CC with gonadotrophins (p &lt; 0.05). The overall incidence of positive pregnancies was 28.98%. Levobupivacaine with dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the mean VAS score from baseline, resulting in a higher foetal body weight. Taking 100 mg of Clomiphene citrate with gonadotropins works better than taking Clomiphene citrate by itself at starting ovulation, increasing the size of the dominant follicle, and improving the thickness of the endometrium. With levobupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine, the labor analgesia showed better stability in hemodynamic parameters and effective control on labor pain scores.

An Innovative Approach to Determine Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Pump Settings for Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Three settings are required on a programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) pump for labor analgesia: the PIEB next bolus (PIEBnb), PIEB interval (PIEBi), and PIEB volume (PIEBv). The ideal settings for these parameters are still unknown. We hypothesized a mathematical modeling tool, response surface methodology (RSM), could estimate 3 PIEB pump parameters while balancing 3 clinically important patient outcomes simultaneously. The study objective was to use RSM to estimate PIEB settings (PIEBnb, PIEBi, and PIEBv) while maximizing maternal satisfaction, minimizing the need for clinician-administered boluses, and optimizing the ratio of delivered/requested patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) boluses simultaneously. With institutional ethics approval, a double-blind randomized trial was completed in a tertiary care labor and delivery center. Nulliparous, English-speaking American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II patients aged 18 to 45 years at full term, single gestation in vertex presentation, in spontaneous labor and ≤7 cm cervical dilation were included. Patients with comorbidities, contraindications to neuraxial analgesia, using chronic analgesics, <152 cm, or body mass index (BMI) >45 kg/m 2 were excluded. After informed consent, labor analgesia was initiated using 10 mL ropivacaine 0.2% with 10 µg/mL fentanyl solution and PCEA (volume 6 mL every 10 minutes). Patients were randomized to predetermined PIEB settings. RSM identified 3 pump settings that represented a stationary point that best maximized or minimized 3 outcomes simultaneously: PCEA ratio (a ratio closest to 1), clinician bolus (optimal is 0), and maternal satisfaction (visual analog scale, 0-100, ideal response is ≥90). Of 287 potential participants, 192 did not meet inclusion criteria or declined to participate, and 26 were withdrawn, leaving 69 patients for study inclusion. Using RSM, the suggested PIEB settings for all the primary study outcomes were as follows: PIEBnb = 29.4 minutes, PIEBi = 59.8 minutes, and PIEBv = 6.2 mL. These PIEB settings corresponded to the following clinical outcomes: maternal satisfaction at 93.9%, PCEA ratio at 0.77, and need for clinician bolus at 0.29. The dermatome sensory score was between T10 and T5 in 89% of the patients. The median lowest Bromage score was 4. This novel study used a mathematical model to estimate PIEB pump settings while simultaneously maximizing 3 clinical outcomes. Equally weighted clinical outcomes prevent maximal outcome optimization and may not reflect patient priorities. Future studies or quality improvement endeavors could use RSM methodology to estimate PIEB pump settings targeting optimal values for a single clinical outcome of determined importance to parturients.

Update on the Obstetric Anesthesia Practice in Flanders/Belgium: A 10-year follow-up survey and review

Background: With 75% of women receiving neuraxial anesthesia for labor and cesarean section (CS) in Flanders, Belgium, obstetric anesthesia is an essential part of perinatal care. Despite advancements in obstetric anesthesia and guidelines being updated regularly, past surveys have shown great variability among hospitals. Objective: This investigation aims to observe current obstetric anesthesia practices, compare them with previous surveys, and assess adherence to guidelines among anesthesiologists. Methods: An online questionnaire-based survey, approved by the KU Leuven Ethics Committee, was conducted focusing on three main topics: analgesia during labor, anesthesia for CS, and postoperative analgesia after CS. The survey, consisting of 127 questions, was distributed via email to the heads of anesthesia departments in 57 Flemish hospitals providing obstetric anesthesia care. Responses were anonymously analyzed. Results: For labor analgesia initiation, a conventional epidural with administration of ropivacaine 0.2% (+- sufentanil) remains the most widespread used technique, although Combined-Spinal Epidural (CSE) has gained significant popularity. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in combination with continuous epidural infusion (CEI) is the preferred maintenance method, however programmed-intermittent bolus (PIEB) has found its way into standard practice. CSs are mostly done by performing CSE or single shot spinal, using hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% with sufentanil. Spinal-induced hypotension is treated with a combination of left lateral tilt, fluid administration and vasopressor administration, usually as a bolus. Post-CS pain is mainly treated by a combination of oral/ parenteral analgesics and neuraxial analgesia (PCEA +- CEI), with only a minority choosing regional techniques such as wound infiltration, transverse abdominal plane blocks, quadratus lumborum blocks, etc. Conclusion: Compared to previous surveys, the Flemish anesthesiologists adhere well to the latest guidelines and gold standards in obstetric anesthesia, consistently modernizing their practices. Nevertheless, with the continual introduction of novel techniques and methods, it is imperative for practitioners to maintain efforts in pursuing ongoing innovation.

Role of lumbar puncture level on the onset of epidural labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial.

To compare the speed of achieving painless uterine contractions in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia at different lumbar puncture levels. This study is a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary A hospital with a history of over 80years in Sichuan Province, China. Parturients aged 22-40years old scheduled for vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into lumbar 2-3 (L2-3) or lumbar 3-4 (L3-4) groups. Epidural analgesia was performed through the interspaces according to grouping. The primary outcome was the percentage of painless uterine contractions 15min after the initiation of analgesia. The secondary outcomes included the percentage of painless status at 5 and 10min, sensory block plane, motor block evaluation, adverse events of parturients, epidural analgesic consumption, Apgar score, and the parturients' evaluation of analgesia. Between April 2023 and August 2023, a total of 150 women were finally recruited, and 136 of them were analyzed (68 in each group). In comparison with the L3-4 groups, there was a significantly larger proportion of painless uterine contractions at 5, 10, and 15min after analgesia initiation in the L2-3 group (20.6% vs. 7.4%, 52.9% vs. 26.5%, and 80.9% vs. 64.7%, P = .026, .002, and .034, respectively). Similarly, the pain scores were lower in the L2-3 group at 5, 10, and 15min than that in the L3-4 group (5(4,7) vs. 6(5,7), 3(2,5) vs. 4(3,6), and 2(1,3) vs. 3(2,5), P = .006, .004, and .020, respectively). Furthermore, puncturing through the L2-3 interspace contributed to a higher evaluation of parturients to the analgesia procedure (9(8,9) vs. 8(8,9), P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in sensory block, motor block, or adverse events between the two groups. Puncturing through the L2-3 interspace is associated with faster pain relief and a better experience for parturients. These findings present a superior option for anesthesiologists when conducting epidural labor analgesia. Key messages What is already known on this topic? Epidural analgesia is an effective way to relieve labor pain. What this study adds? Puncturing via lumbar 2-3 interspace induces more rapid onset of epidural analgesia. How this study might affect research, practice or policy? Lumbar 2-3 interspace is a superior option in terms of the speed of pain relief and satisfaction of parturients when conducting epidural labor analgesia.

Median effective dose of spinal ropivacaine in combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery following failed vaginal delivery with epidural labor analgesia: a single-blind, sequential dose-finding study.

This study aimed to estimate the median effective dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia after epidural labor analgesia. Patients aged 20-40years with American Society of Anesthesiology scores of I-II, body mass index ≤ 36, who underwent emergency cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia of a duration ≤ 6h were included in the study. After removal of the epidural used for labor analgesia, a new combined spinal epidural was performed, and a dose of intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine without opioid was administered. The dose was determined using up-down methodology, with the starting patient's dose set to 12mg. Adequate anesthesia, defined as a pinprick level no lower than T6 at 5min after ropivacaine administration, resulted in the next patient receiving a dose of ropivacaine 1mg higher, and inadequate anesthesia 1mg lower. The primary outcome was the median (95% confidence interval (CI)) dose of spinal ropivacaine required for adequate cesarean delivery anesthesia. Of the 46 patients included in the study, 40 were analyzed. The median spinal ropivacaine dose was 8.11mg (95% CI 7.29-8.93mg) by the Dixon and Mood method and 8.06mg (95% CI 6.93-9.00mg) by isotonic regression. Two patients had high spinal anesthesia. Our findings suggest that for 50% of patients undergoing cesarean delivery after failed vaginal delivery with epidural analgesia, an 8-mg spinal dose of isobaric ropivacaine without opioid provides an anesthesia level no lower than T6 at 5min.

Comparison of lidocaine bicarbonate with fentanyl and chloroprocaine for epidural anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

Chloroprocaine and lidocaine bicarbonate are commonly used for epidural anesthesia because of their rapid onset, particularly in the case of conversion from epidural labor analgesia to emergency cesarean section. However, it is unclear whether lidocaine bicarbonate combined with fentanyl has an advantage over chloroprocaine alone in emergency cesarean section. In this study, 102 women who underwent elective cesarean section received 15mL 3% chloroprocaine and 1mL saline (CP group) or 15mL 1.73% lidocaine bicarbonate and 1mL fentanyl 50μg (LF group) for epidural anesthesia. Nociceptive block level was assessed by pinprick and recorded every minute. The primary outcome was the onset time to T6 block. The median onset time to T6 analgesia was 10 [10, 10] min in the CP group and 10 [7, 10] min in the LF group (COX model for CP versus LF, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, p = 0.035). The median onset time to T8 analgesia was 7 [5, 9] min in CP group and 5 [4, 7] min in LF group (COX model for CP versus LF, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.95, p = 0.027). The proportion of hypotension episodes occurring before delivery in LF group was lower than that in CP group (p = 0.011). The incidence of block level ≥ T4 after supplemental dosing in the LF group was lower than that in the CP group (p = 0.031). Compared with 3% chloroprocaine, 1.73% lidocaine bicarbonate combined with fentanyl 50μg has a slightly faster onset time and less hypotension in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.html, identifier ChiCTR2200056180.

90% effective volume of 0.1% ropivacaine combined with 0.4 µg/ml sufentanil for epidural labour analgesia with push pump at a rate of 400 mL/hr and a bolus interval of 30 min: a double-blind sequential dose-finding study

BackgroundIt was reported that either shorter programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) intervals or high-speed bolus can produce more extensive epidural spread. We hypothesized that a combination of shortened time interval and increased speed of epidural bolus might further improve analgesic effect and therefore reduce the hourly volume for epidural labour analgesia.MethodsThis double-blind dose-finding study used a biased coin up-and-down sequential allocation method to determine the 90% effective bolus volume of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil while using the push pump at a rate of 400 mL/hr and interval of 30 min to provide effective analgesia without breakthrough pain. We used 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.4 µg/mL sufentanil, with bolus volumes ranging from 3 to 6 mL. The first patient was assigned a volume of 3 mL, and the remaining volumes were assigned according to the biased coin-up-and-down method.ResultsThe estimated 90% effective volume (EV90) of ropivacaine combined with sufentanil for epidural labour analgesia at a time interval of 30 min was 4.88 mL (95% confidence interval 4.83–5.38).ConclusionsThe optimum bolus volume of ropivacaine with sufentanil while using push pump at a time interval of 30 min is approximately 5 mL. It could probably further reduce the hourly bolus volume for epidural labour analgesia.

How does automated mandatory bolus compare with basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labor?

How does automated mandatory bolus compare with basal infusion for maintenance of epidural analgesia in labor?

The evaluation of the performance of ChatGPT in the management of labor analgesia

ChatGPT4 is a leading large language model (LLM) chatbot released by OpenAI in 2023. ChatGPT4 can respond to free-text queries, answer questions and make suggestions regarding virtually any topic. ChatGPT4 has successfully answered anesthesia and even obstetric anesthesia knowledge-based questions with reasonable accuracy. However, ChatGPT4 has yet to be challenged in obstetric anesthesia clinical decision-making. Study Objective: In this study, we evaluated the performance of ChatGPT4 in the management of clinical labor analgesia scenarios compared to expert obstetric anesthesiologists. Intervention: Eight clinical questions with progressively increasing medical complexity were posed to ChatGPT4. Measurements: The ChatGPT4 responses were rated by seven expert obstetric anesthesiologists based on safety, accuracy and completeness of each response using a five-point Likert rating scale. Main Results:ChatGPT4 was deemed safe in 73% of responses to the presented obstetric anesthesia clinical scenarios (27% of responses were deemed unsafe). None of the ChatGPT4 responses were unanimously deemed to be safe by all seven expert obstetric anesthesiologists. Moreover, ChatGPT4 responses were overall partly accurate (score 4 out of 5) and somewhat incomplete (score 3.5 out of 5). Conclusions: In summary, approximately one quarter of all responses by ChatGPT4 were deemed unsafe by expert obstetric anesthesiologists. These findings may suggest the need for more fine-tuning and training of LLMs such as ChatGPT4 specifically for clinical decision making in obstetric anesthesia or other specialized medical fields. These LLMs may come to play an important future role in assisting obstetric anesthesiologists in clinical decision making and enhancing overall patient care.

Nurses' perception of epidural services in a Johannesburg academic setting.

Labour pain is associated with detrimental maternal and foetal physical and psychological effects. Labour analgesia is a basic right for all women and labour epidural analgesia has been accepted as the gold standard for providing such, with reported improvement in patient satisfaction. In South Africa, studies have shown that labour epidural rates are low. At an academic hospital in Johannesburg, a 24-h labour epidural service combined with an awareness campaign and educational programme (LEAP) was initiated with the aim of improving labour epidural rates. Results showed a short-lived uptake with a subsequent decline. This study explored the experiences of labour ward nursing staff regarding the labour epidural service at this academic hospital including perceived limitations and possible recommendations regarding improving service provision. A qualitative, descriptive and exploratory study was conducted. Purposive sampling was used with semistructured, audio-recorded individual interviews, thematic analysis was performed using Braun and Clarke's six-phase approach. The key theme is required education and supervision of epidural insertion (see page 3), management of childbirth and challenges related to epidural service provision. A positive sentiment was expressed by the participants; however, deficiencies in the service such as shortages of experienced personnel, work constraints and insufficient training may be affecting service sustainability. Further studies are recommended to form guidance towards the development and implementation of interventions to improve service delivery.Contribution:Provision of continual training and increased staffing of healthcare personnel will help improve the sustainability of the labour epidural service.

Epidural analgesia in labour and the risk of emergency caesarean: a retrospective observational study

Epidural analgesia in labour and the risk of emergency caesarean: a retrospective observational study