Anal Verge Research Articles

A Phase II Trial of Celecoxib with Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiation for Patients with Localized Rectal Adenocarcinoma Stage II and III

Abstract Background In recent years, neoadjuvant chemoradiation and subsequent surgical resection with total mesorectal excision has been shown to increase local control with decreased toxicity in comparison to upfront surgical resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of adding a selective COX-2 inhibitor to standart neoadjuvant chemoradiation on pathologic response, sphincter preservation and acute toxicity. Materials and Methods Thirty patients with Adenocarcinoma of rectum (up to 15 cm of anal verge) were enrolled in this phase 2 study. Patients undergone full colonoscopy, MRI rectal protocol, abdomino-pelvic and chest CT scan for staging then received neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation (capecitabine 825 mg/m2 bid in combination with celecoxib 200 mg bid and radiotherapy (50-50.4Gy/25-28fraction). Surgery was done 5-12 weeks after chemoradiation. Acute complications were scored by common toxicity criteria 5.0 and tumor response was graded according to AJCC and CAP guidelines for rectal adenocarcinoma. Results Of 30 patients, total mesorectal excision was done in 22 patients. Tumor regression grade was reported as: 7 patients (31.8%) had grade 0 or complete response, 7 patients (31.8%) had grade 1 or moderate response, 6 patients (27%) had grade 2 or minimal response and 2 patients (9%) had grade 3 or poor response. Primary tumor down staging was 63% and nodal down staging was 73% with sphincteric preservation rate of 77% among the operated cohort. No patients had hematologic or cardio-vascular toxicity. Conclusion Results indicate celecoxib in combination with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is safe and associated with low toxicity. This combination can promote pathologic complete response, tumor regression grade, sphincteric preservation, T and N down staging in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Total mesorectal excision quality in rectal cancer surgery affects local recurrence rate but not distant recurrence and survival: population-based cohort study.

The quality of the total mesorectal excision specimen in rectal cancer surgery is assessed with a three-tier grade (mesorectal, intramesorectal and muscularis propria). This study aimed to analyse the prognostic impact of the total mesorectal excision grade on survival, and to identify risk factors for intramesorectal and muscularis propria resection in a population-based setting. All patients in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry with rectal cancer stage I-III ≤ 10 cm from the anal verge, diagnosed 2015-2019, undergoing total mesorectal excision were analysed. Clinical, surgical and pathological data were retrieved and analysed for the following primary outcomes: local and distant recurrence and overall and relative survival; secondary outcomes were risk factors for total mesorectal excision grading (intramesorectal or muscularis propria resection). Of note, postoperative death < 30 days or recurrence within 90 days were exclusion criteria for survival and recurrence analysis. Recurrence-free patients with less than 3 years follow-up, and patients lacking data regarding recurrence, were also excluded from recurrence analyses. Overall, of 7979 patients treated during the study interval, 1499 patients were eligible for recurrence, 2441 patients for survival and 2476 patients for risk-factor analyses, of which 75% were graded mesorectal, 17% intramesorectal and 8% muscularis propria. Median follow-up for survival was 42 (1-77) months. The worst total mesorectal excision grading (muscularis propria resection) was an independent risk factor for local recurrence in multivariable analysis (HR 2.73, 95% c.i. 1.07 to 7.0, P = 0.036). Total mesorectal excision grade had no impact on distant recurrence or survival. Female sex, tumour level <5 cm, abdominoperineal resection, minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic and robotic), high blood loss, long duration of surgery and intraoperative perforation were independent risk factors for worse total mesorectal excision grading (intramesorectal and/or muscularis propria resection) in multivariable analyses. Muscularis propria resection increases the risk of local recurrence but does not seem to affect distant recurrence or survival.

Textbook outcome in low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Post hoc analysis of the LASRE randomized clinical trial

BackgroundTextbook outcome has been incorporated into quality assessment measures in various oncological settings; however, it has not been applied to patients with low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). This study aimed to examine the prevalence and predictors of achieving a textbook outcome in patients undergoing surgical resection of low rectal cancer after nCRT. Patients and methodsThis study was a post hoc subgroup analysis of the prospective multicentric LASRE trial, which specifically enrolled patients with rectal cancer located within 5 cm from the dentate line at diagnosis, tumors with diameters less than 6 cm, and patients who underwent radical laparoscopic or open resection. A total of 597 patients who had clinically staged cT3-4aN0-2M0 tumors with diameters less than 6 cm and who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical resection were included. ResultsTextbook outcome was achieved in 60.0 % of patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index >25 kg/m2 (OR = 0.594, P = 0.01), tumor distance from the anal verge >40 mm (OR = 5.518, P < 0.001), operative time >202 min (OR = 0.675, P = 0.04), and laparoscopic approach (OR = 1.497, P = 0.04) were independently predictive factors for the achievement of a textbook outcome in low rectal cancer patients undergoing nCRT and radical resection. A predictive nomogram for achieving a textbook outcome was constructed, yielding a C-index of 0.727. ConclusionsLaparoscopic resection exhibited promising potential in improving the probability of achieving a textbook outcome.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To some extent, robotic technique does offer certain benefits in rectal cancer surgery than laparoscopic one, while remains a topic of ongoing debate for rectal cancer patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). Potential studies published until January 2024 were obtained from Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and PubMed. Dichotomous and continuous variables were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% their confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. A random effects model was used if I2 statistic >50%, otherwise a fixed effects model. Eleven studies involving 1079 patients were analyzed. The robotic-assisted group had an 0.4cm shorter distance from anal verge (95% CI: -0.680 to -0.114, P=0.006) and 1.94 times higher complete total mesorectal excision (TME) rate (OR=1.936, 95% CI: 1.061 to 3.532, P=0.031). However, the operation time in the robotic-assisted group was 54 minutes longer (95% CI: 20.489 to 87.037, P=0.002) than laparoscopic group. In addition, the robotic-assisted group had a lower open conversion rate (OR=0.324, 95% CI: 0.129 to 0.816, P=0.017) and a shorter length of hospital stay (WMD=-1.127, 95% CI: -2.071 to -0.184, P=0.019). Robot-assisted surgery offered several advantages over laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced mid-low rectal cancer following NCRT in terms of resection of lower tumours with improved TME completeness, lower open conversion rate and shorter hospital stay, despite longer operative time.

Constructing a personalized nomogram model for predicting anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer

The purpose of this study was to explore the risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer and to construct a nomogram prediction model for AL after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. We selected 366 patients with rectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer in our hospital between January 2021 and December 2023 as the research subjects. Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors for AL after laparoscopic radical resection for rectal cancer, and a nomogram model for AL after radical resection for rectal cancer was constructed and validated. Our results showed among 366 patients with rectal cancer, 42 patients developed AL after surgery, and the incidence rate of AL was 11.48%. Logistic regression analysis results showed that gender, preoperative intestinal obstruction, distance between the tumor and the anal edge ≤7 cm, and diabetes were risk factors for AL after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer (P < 0.05). The calibration curve of the nomogram model for AL after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer showed that the model's predicted value and actual value fit well, and the area under the curve of the model was 0.859, (95%CI: 0.807–0.912). Overall, gender, preoperative intestinal obstruction, distance between the tumor and the anal verge ≤7 cm, and diabetes are risk factors for AL after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. The nomogram model of AL after laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer has high accuracy and has a certain guiding significance for formulating prevention and treatment strategies in advance.

Association of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes in Total Mesorectal Excision and Margin Status for Rectal Cancer

IntroductionDespite being a key metric with a significant correlation with the outcomes of patients with rectal cancer, the optimal surgical approach for total mesorectal excision (TME) has not yet been identified. The aim of this study was to assess the association of the surgical approach on the quality of TME and surgical margins and to characterize the surgical and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing robotic, laparoscopic, and open TME for rectal cancer. MethodsPatients with primary, nonmetastatic rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent either lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection via robotic (Rob), laparoscopic (Lap), or open approaches were selected from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database (2007-2017). Quasi-Poisson regression analysis with backward selection was used to investigate the relationship between the surgical approach and outcomes of interest. ResultsAmong the 664 patients included in the study, the distribution of surgical approaches was as follows: 351 (52.9%) underwent TME via the open approach, 159 (23.9%) via the robotic approach, and 154 (23.2%) via the laparoscopic approach. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics among the three cohorts. The laparoscopic cohort had fewer patients with low rectal cancer (<6 cm from the anal verge) than the robotic and open cohorts (Lap 28.6% versus Rob 59.1% versus Open 45.6%, P = 0.015). Patients who underwent Rob and Lap TME had lower intraoperative blood loss compared with the Open approach (Rob 200 mL [Q1, Q3: 100.0, 300.0] versus Lap 150 mL [Q1, Q3: 75.0, 250.0] versus Open 300 mL [Q1, Q3: 150.0, 600.0], P < 0.001). There was no difference in the operative time (Rob 243 min [Q1, Q3: 203.8, 300.2] versus Lap 241 min [Q1, Q3: 186, 336] versus Open 226 min [Q1, Q3: 178, 315.8], P = 0.309) between the three approaches. Postoperative length of stay was shorter with robotic and laparoscopic approach compared to open approach (Rob 5.0 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8.2] versus Lap 5 d [Q1, Q3: 4, 8] versus Open 7.0 d [Q1, Q3: 5, 9], P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches (79.2%, 64.9%, and 64.7%, respectively; P = 0.46). The margin positivity rate, a composite of circumferential margin and distal margin, was higher with the robotic and open approaches than with the laparoscopic approach (Rob 8.2% versus Open 6.6% versus Lap 1.9%, P = 0.17), Rob versus Lap (odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.05, 0.83) and Rob versus Open (odds ratio 0.5; 95% confidence interval 0.22, 1.12). There was no difference in long-term survival, including overall survival and recurrence-free survival, between patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, or open TME (Figure 1). ConclusionsIn patients undergoing surgery with curative intent for rectal cancer, we did not observe a difference in the quality of TME between the robotic, laparoscopic, or open approaches. Robotic and open TME compared to laparoscopic TME were associated with higher margin positivity rates in our study. This was likely due to the higher percentage of low rectal cancers in the robotic and open cohorts. We also reported no significant differences in overall survival and recurrence-free survival between the aforementioned surgical techniques.

Migrated tubal sterilisation clip presenting as a subcutaneous gluteal foreign body 24 years later: a case report and literature review

BackgroundThe incidence of sterilisation clip migration is reportedly 25%. However, less than 1% of those who experience clip migration will present with pain, an abscess, or spontaneous extrusion. Here we present a rare case of sterilisation clip migration through the entire pelvic floor.Case presentationA 66-year-old female was referred from community to the Surgical Emergency Unit with a possible metallic foreign body under the skin following an attempted routine gluteal cyst excision. The patient first noticed a lump under the skin 2 years ago which gradually became more apparent and tender over the previous 2 months. The patient denied recent trauma, had no co-morbidities and had a sterilisation procedure 24 years prior. Examination revealed a non-mobile solid structure just beneath the skin 5 cm laterally from the anal verge. Inflammatory markers were normal and an ultrasound confirmed a 15 × 7 mm foreign body in the subcutaneous tissues. The foreign body was excised easily under local anaesthesia, revealing a closed Filshie sterilisation clip. The wound was closed primarily, and recovery was uncomplicated.ConclusionsThis was a case of sterilisation clip migration to the subcutaneous gluteal region. A literature review revealed 34 case reports of sterilisation clip migration, mostly to the bladder. Patients with a previous sterilisation procedure and suspected subcutaneous foreign body without trauma should elicit a high index of suspicion for migrated sterilisation clips. These clips can migrate through multiple layers of muscle and fascia, including the pelvic floor.

Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): Primary outcome of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

3617 Background: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer is gaining popularity, but persuasive evidence on long-term oncological outcomes is lacking. This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery regarding surgical quality and long-term oncological outcomes among patients with middle and low rectal cancer. Previously the short-term outcomes of this trial had been reported that robotic surgery had significantly lower circumferential resection margin positivity rate, lower postoperative complication rate, and better postoperative recovery. Now the long-term oncological outcomes were reported. Methods: This superiority trial was undertaken at 11 hospitals in 8 Chinese provinces. Patients with middle (&gt; 5–10 cm from anal verge) or low (0–5 cm from anal verge) rectal adenocarcinoma, cT1–T3 N0–1 or ycT1–T3 Nx after preoperative radio-/chemoradiotherapy, and no evidence of distant metastasis were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive robotic or conventional laparoscopic surgery. The 3-year locoregional recurrence rate was the primary outcome and was compared using modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival and overall survival. All time-to-event outcomes were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02817126). Results: Between July 2016 and December 2020, 1240 patients were enrolled, and 1171 were included in the mITT analysis (586 in robotic and 585 in laparoscopic group). The pathological TNM stage of the mITT population was 73 (6.2%) patients with complete response, 346 (29.5%) with stage I, 368 (31.4%) with stage II, 384 (32.8%) with stage III. And the median follow-up time was 43.0 months (interquartile range = 36.7 to 60.0), with 34 (2.9%) patients lost to follow-up. The 3-year locoregional recurrence rate in robotic group (1.5%) was significantly lower than in laparoscopic group (4.0%, log-rank p=0.025, hazard ratio = 0.451, 95% confidence interval = 0.221 to 0.921). Robotic group also had significantly higher 3-year disease-free survival rate (87.3% vs. 83.6%, log-rank p=0.035). No significant difference was observed in 3-year overall survival rate (94.8% vs. 93.1%, log-rank p=0.155). Conclusions: Robotic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer significantly reduced locoregional recurrence and improved disease-free survival, compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. Clinical trial information: NCT02817126 .

Prediction models of locally advanced rectal cancer prognosis incorporating perioperative longitudinal clinical data: A retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

e15624 Background: For locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant chemoradiation(CCRT) followed by surgery is a standard treatment. Clinical T/N stage, whether pathological complete remission (pCR) after neoadjuvant CCRT or not are well recognized tumor features that predict disease prognosis. Although the parameters that determine pathologic stage are the strongest predictors of postoperative outcome, other clinical, molecular, and histologic features may influence prognosis independent of stage. The aim is to compare the predictive efficiency, between different models for overall survival in rectal cancer patients. Methods: This retrospective study is approved by TMU-JIRB(Protocol Number: N201809032).This is also a single institute study. 175 newly-diagnosed patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively enrolled between Jan.2011 and Dec.2016. Basic information include sex, age, body weight, body height, previous medical history were recorded. CEA level, chemotherapy regimen, type of surgery, and distance between tumor and anal verge were also collected. Chemotherapy regimen of CCRT including 5FU+LV, capecitabine (Xeloda), FOLFOX, and FOLFIRI are recorded. Surgical resection was then followed 4-8 weeks after completion of CCRT. The 2010 AJCC tumor response grading (TRG) system was used to report treatment response of proctectomy samples. The progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) are then calculated. PFS is defined as survival without any recurrence or distant metastasis before Dec 31st, 2023. A comprehensive evaluation was conducted by incorporating all these machine learning models together. The aim was to compare their predictive efficiency, with models such as Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, KNeighbor, SVM, Decision Tree, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and LightGBM. Results: 175 patients (104 men and 71 women) were enrolled in this study. The median follow up time was 7.1 yrs. The BMI was 24.05 ± 0.03 for men and 24.20 ± 0.07 for women. 32 (17.3%) patients achieved pCR, TRG 0. Clinical staging cT3 (78.8%) and nodal positive (78.8%) are the most common tumor feature in this study group. The median age of male and female patient is 58.6 and 56.1 respectively. Upon applying various machine learning models, different predictive accuracies emerged. The Random Forest, KNeighbor, and SVM models all achieved an accuracy of 0.9250. Naïve Bayes had an accuracy of 0.8620, while the SVC model registered at 0.9310, and XGBoost was slightly behind at 0.9286. SVC model is marking the best-performing model in this evaluation. Conclusions: This multicenter retrospective data-driven deep learning prediction model informed that SVC model yielded the best predictive results. Further prospective clinical trials and external validation of this prediction model are needed to further reinforce our findings.

“WATCH AND WAIT” STRATEGY IN RECTAL CANCER PATIENTS WITH A COMPLETE CLINICAL RESPONSE AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIATION THERAPY: A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE

Background. The non-operative management of rectal adenocarcinoma (RA) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) has gained increasing attention. The “Watch and Wait” (“W&amp;W”) strategy allows one to avoid surgery-related reduction in the quality of life due to permanent pelvic organ dysfunction or irreversible stoma. Still, the oncological safety of this strategy is under evaluation. Aim. To share a single-center experience of the “W&amp;W” strategy. Materials and Methods. The retrospective analysis of 125 patients who received nCRT in 2016—2021 was performed. Patients who met the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO, 2017) criteria of clinical complete response (cCR) and received non-operative management were analyzed. Results. Ten patients (8%) were re-staged after nCRT as cCR and followed the “W&amp;W” strategy. Patients’ characteristics: 7 female, 3 male; mean age 67.3 years. Tumor characteristics: pre-treatment N+ was present in 7 cases; G1 adenocarcinoma in a majority of cases; mean tumor distance from the anal verge — 5.85 cm; mean tumor circumference — 71%; mean tumor length — 3.87 cm. The mean follow-up time was 30 months. Local regrowth or/and distant metastases developed in 3 cases. The 2-year disease-free survival was 70%. Conclusions. Most of the patients following the “W&amp;W” strategy have benefited. However, to reduce the number of relapses, it is necessary to perform a more careful selection of patients.

Win Statistics in Observational Cancer Research: Integrating Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes.

Background: Quality-of-life metrics are increasingly important for oncological patients alongside traditional endpoints like mortality and disease progression. Statistical tools such as Win Ratio, Win Odds, and Net Benefit prioritize clinically significant outcomes using composite endpoints. In randomized trials, Win Statistics provide fair comparisons between treatment and control groups. However, their use in observational studies is complicated by confounding variables. Propensity score (PS) matching mitigates confounding variables but may reduce the sample size, affecting the power of win statistics analyses. Alternatively, PS matching can stratify samples, preserving the sample size. This study aims to assess the long-term impact of these methods on decision making, particularly in colorectal cancer patients. Methods: A motivating example involves a cohort of patients from the ReSARCh observational study (2016-2021) with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum, situated up to 12 cm from the anal verge. These patients underwent either a watch-and-wait approach (WW) or trans-anal local excision (LE). Win statistics compared the effects of WW and LE on a composite outcome (overall survival, recurrence, presence of ostomy, and rectum excision). For matched win statistics, we used robust inference techniques proposed by Matsouaka et al. (2022), and for stratified win statistics, we applied the method proposed by Dong et al. (2018). A simulation study assessed the coverage probability of matched and stratified win statistics in balanced and unbalanced groups, calculating how often the confidence intervals included the true values of WR, NB, and WO across 1000 simulations. Results: The results suggest a better efficacy of the LE approach when considering efficacy outcomes alone (WR: 0.47 (0.01 to 1.14); NB: -0.16 (-0.34 to 0.02); and WO: 0.73 (0.5 to 1.05)). However, when QoL outcomes are included in the analyses, the estimates are closer to 1 (WR: 0.87 (0.06 to 2.06); WO: 0.93 (0.61 to 1.4)) and to 0 (NB: -0.04 (-0.25 to 0.17)), indicating a negative impact of the treatment effect of LE regarding the presence of ostomy and the excision of the rectum. Moreover, based on the simulation study, our findings underscore the superior performance of matched compared to stratified win statistics in terms of coverage probability (matched WR: 97% vs. stratified WR: 33.3% in a high-imbalance setting; matched WR: 98% vs. stratified WR: 34.4% in a medium-imbalance setting; and matched WR: 99.2% vs. stratified WR: 37.4% in a low-imbalance setting). Conclusions: In conclusion, our study sheds light on the interpretation of the results of win statistics in terms of statistical significance, providing insights into the application of pairwise comparison in observational settings, promoting its use to improve outcomes for cancer patients.

MRI navigation surgery, including lateral pelvic lymph node dissection following chemoradiotherapy, improves local control and functional preservation of the middle to low rectal cancer

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the appropriateness of MRI navigation surgery following chemoradiotherapy (CRT), including lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LLND) for middle to low rectal cancer. MethodsForty-three consecutive patients with cT2-4b rectal cancer within 10 cm from the anal verge who underwent laparoscopic radical surgery following CRT (45–50.4Gy + S1 80mg/m2) from January 2014 and February 2020 were analyzed. We decided on the operative procedure, including LLND, based on the restaging MRI. We examined the rates of 3-year postoperative local pelvic recurrence, permanent stoma, and recurrent risk factors (Group S). We also compared the results to that of the fourteen patients who enrolled in the previous phase II trial and underwent laparoscopic radical surgery following CRT (40Gy + S-1 (80mg/m2) or UFT (300 mg/m2)) for consecutive cT2-4b rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection. The operative procedure was decided at the initial MRI diagnosis, and the LLND was not performed (Group P). ResultsWe had no local pelvic recurrence in Group S, and the three-year local pelvic recurrence-free survival was significantly better in Group S than P (100 % in S 85.1 % in P, p < 0.05). The permanent stoma rate was not different between the Groups, irrespective of the significantly high rate of cCRM(+) in Group S. The Cox proportional hazards model for significant factors of recurrence on the univariate analysis revealed that ycM and ycEMVI scores were independently significant (p < 0.001). ConclusionMRI navigation surgery, including LLND for rectal cancer following chemoradiotherapy, improves local control and functional preservation.

Postoperative morbidity following Hartmann's procedure in comparison to anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer-a population-based study.

There is ongoing controversy regarding the extent to which Hartmann's procedure (HP) should be used in rectal cancer treatment. This study was designed to investigate 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality following HP, anterior resection (AR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer using a national registry. All patients operated for rectal cancer, tumour height 5-15 cm, between the years 2010 and 2017, were identified through the Swedish colorectal cancer registry. A total of 8476 patients were included: 1210 (14%) undergoing HP, 5406 (64%) AR and 1860 (22%) APR. HP was associated with an increased risk of intra-abdominal infection (OR 1.7, CI 1.26-2.28, P = 0.0004) compared to AR and APR, while APR was related to an increased risk of overall complications (OR 1.18, CI 1.01-1.40, P = 0.040). No significant difference was observed in the rate of reoperations and readmissions between HP, AR and APR, and type of surgical procedure was not a risk factor for 30-day mortality. Findings from a subgroup analysis of patients with a tumour 5-7 cm from the anal verge revealed that HP was not associated with increased risk for complications or 30-day mortality. For patients where AR is not appropriate HP is a valid alternative with a favourable outcome. APR was associated with the highest overall 30-day complication rate.

Colonic polypoid arteriovenous malformation - An unexpected cause of haematochezia.

A 70-year-old male was admitted with severe haematochezia and lipothymia. His medical history was relevant for coronary artery disease and radiation proctopathy. During hospitalization, was hemodynamically stable with persistent haematochezia. Laboratory examination revealed continuous haemoglobin fall, despite erythrocyte reposition, with administration of 11 units since admission. Colonoscopy showed an 8mm fibrinous lesion with an adherent clot, at 40cm from the anal verge. During exploration, a heavy spurting haemorrhage developed, with haemostasis being achieved with 4 clips, followed by site tattoo. Considering the risk of severe bleeding relapse in a high-risk patient, the patient underwent emergent Hartmann type colectomy. Histopathology report revealed a vascular lesion with arterial and venous vessels, protruding through the submucosa, muscular and subserosa, with a focal mucosal erosion, without neoplastic disease, compatible with an arteriovenous malformation (AVM).

Early Experience with EndoRobotic Submucosal Dissection (ERSD): Pathologic and Short-term Outcomes in the First 28 Patients.

To evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-port endorobotic submucosal dissection (ERSD) using the Da Vinci SP platform for the management of rectal neoplasms. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers a potential organ-sparing treatment for advanced colorectal neoplasms but demands high technical skill and a steep learning curve. Advances in semiflexible robotic platforms, such as the Da Vinci SP, promise to simplify this procedure, potentially offering improved outcomes for patients with benign rectal neoplasms. A retrospective analysis of 28 patients who underwent ERSD using the Da Vinci SP platform between 2020 and 2023 was performed. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, procedure details, outcomes, and complications were reviewed. The primary endpoint was successful en-bloc resection. The cohort had a median age of 60.5 years and a median BMI of 28.2kg/m², predominantly male(67.8%) with ASA categories 2 or 3(82%). Lesions had a median size of 38mm and were located a median of 9cm from the anal verge. The median procedure time was 87.5 minutes. En-bloc resection was achieved in all cases(100%), with no intraoperative complications or mortality. One patient experienced urinary retention, and one had late bleeding requiring blood transfusion. Pathology outcomes included 46.4% tubulovillous adenomas, 21.4% adenocarcinomas, and high-grade dysplasia in 53.6% of patients. Single-port ERSD using the Da Vinci SP platform is safe and feasible for the management of colorectal neoplasia, ensuring a high rate of en-bloc resection. It potentially offers advantages over conventional ESD, including shorter dissection times, although further studies are necessary for a definitive comparison.

Low rectal resection for low rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma: Are we discussing the same risks?

To evaluate the rate and risk factors for anastomosis leakage in patients undergoing colorectal resection with low anastomosis for rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma. A retrospective cohort study evaluating prospectively collected data was conducted. Patients undergoing colorectal resection for rectal endometriosis and rectal adenocarcinoma with low anastomosis (<7 cm from the anal verge [AV]) from September 2018 to January 2023 were included in the analysis. The main outcome was the rate of anastomosis leakage. A multivariate logistic regression was conducted to evaluate risk factors for anastomosis leakage in both groups. A total of 159 patients underwent colorectal resection with low anastomosis due to rectal endometriosis (n = 99) and rectal adenocarcinoma (n = 60). Patients with endometriosis were significantly younger than those with adenocarcinoma (35.7 ± 5.1 vs 63.7 ± 12.6; P = 0.001). The leakage rate was similar between the endometriosis (n = 12, 12.1%) and adenocarcinoma (n = 9, 15.0%) patients (P = 0.621). The anastomosis height less than 5 cm from the AV (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 12.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.24-23.54) was significantly associated with the anastomosis leakage. Protective stoma was associated with the decrease of the leakage risk (aOR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-0.72). The type of disease (rectal endometriosis or adenocarcinoma) was not associated with the anastomosis leakage (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 0.34-21.23). Despite the different pathogenesis, the risk of anastomotic leakage was found to be similar between patients with low rectal endometriosis and those with rectal adenocarcinoma. These results must be considered by the gynecologist and colorectal surgeon to deliver proper information before rectal surgery for endometriosis.

Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life of Patients After Sphincter Preservation Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Background After anterior resection (AR), one of the most debilitating complications is low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) seenin about 64% of patients. The severity of the LARS score wassignificantly correlated with neoadjuvant treatment, the extent of rectal surgery, complication by the anastomotic leak, female gender, and age < 64 years. In this study, weanalyzed the impact of various clinical factors on LARS and also the various domains of quality of life (QoL). Purpose To assess the incidence of LARS in patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer after the patient starts long-term defecating per anus, change in the QoL, and relation to LARS and factors affecting it. Methods One year before, 72 patients who had undergone AR in the Regional Cancer Centre were interviewed by a trained interviewer and data was collected from the file. Thequestionnairesused were the Wexner Incontinence score, LARS Malayalam Questionnaire, and European Organisation For Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ C30 Malayalam translations. Statistical measures The LARS score wasused to categorize patients into three grades. The scores werecompared with clinical and social factors using the χ2 test for association. Continuous variables were compared by the Spearman Rho test. Results Details of patients were studied(male: 55.6% (40) andfemale: 44.4% (32)). Fifty patientsunderwent low anterior resection (LAR). The mean LARSscore was 25.61, with 47.2% of patients having severe LARS score. The mean Wexner score was 6.84. The relation withtype of surgery, approach (laparoscopic vs open), or type of neoadjuvant therapy was not found to be significant. A higher LARS score did not impact overall QoL as assessed by FACT-C. Insomnia and diarrhea symptoms scores were significantly worsened. The pain score was worse for those undergoing stapler anastomosis. Wexner's score was worse for those who had received adjuvant chemotherapy. Role functioning score was better for AR compared to low anterior resection (LAR). Only distance from the anal verge was found to be a significant cause of LARS and was negatively correlated. Discussion LARS of severe degrees were seen in most patients. No modifiable risk factors were significantly found to affect the chance of LARS. However, LARS did not have a significant impact on QoL, neither did the type of surgery. So sphincter preservation can be offered to the patients, but all patients undergoing LAR should be counseled well about the risk ofLARS before surgery.

Short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic radical surgery for rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor

BackgroundThe optimal approach for ensuring both complete resection and preservation of anal function in rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to clarify short-term and long-term outcomes after robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST.MethodsA total of 13 patients who underwent robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST between December 2011 and April 2022 were included. All robotic procedures were performed using a systematic approach. A supplemental video of robotic radical surgery for rectal GIST is attached. The short-term outcome was the incidence of postoperative complications during the first 30 days after surgery. Surgical outcomes were retrieved from a prospective database. Long-term outcomes, including overall survival and recurrence-free survival, were determined in all patients.ResultsMedian distance from the tumor to the anal verge was 4.0 cm. Surgical margins were negative in all patients. Two patients underwent neoadjuvant imatinib therapy. All patients underwent sphincter-preserving surgery. None underwent conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery. The incidence of postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade II and grade ≥ III complications was 7.7% and 0%, respectively. The median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. Twelve patients (92.3%) underwent stoma closure within 5 months of the initial surgery. Median follow-up time was 76 months. The 5-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were both 100%. None of the patients had recurrence.ConclusionShort-term and long-term outcomes after radical robotic surgery for rectal GIST were favorable. Robotic surgery might be a useful surgical approach for rectal GIST.

Feasibility of robotic-assisted surgery in advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre prospective phase II study (VITRUVIANO trial).

The potential benefits of robotic-assisted compared with laparoscopic surgery for locally advanced cancer have not been sufficiently proven by prospective studies. One factor is speculated to be the lack of strict surgeon criteria. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes for robotic surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with strict surgeon experience criteria. A criterion was set requiring surgeons to have performed more than 40 robotically assisted operations for rectal cancer. Between March 2020 and May 2022, patients with rectal cancer (distance from the anal verge of 12 cm or less, cT2-T4a, cN0-N3, cM0, or cT1-T4a, cN1-N3, cM0) were registered. The primary endpoint was the rate positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) from the pathological specimen. Secondary endpoints were surgical outcomes, pathological results, postoperative complications, and longterm outcomes. Of the 321 registered patients, 303 were analysed, excluding 18 that were ineligible. At diagnosis: stage I (n = 68), stage II (n = 84) and stage III (n = 151). Neoadjuvant therapy was used in 56 patients. There were no conversions to open surgery. The median console time to rectal resection was 170 min, and the median blood loss was 5 ml. Fourteen patients had a positive CRM (4.6%). Grade III-IV postoperative complications were observed in 13 patients (4.3%). Robotic-assisted surgery is feasible for locally advanced rectal cancer when strict surgeon criteria are used.

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (r-TAMIS): perioperative and short-term outcomes for local excision of rectal cancers

BackgroundTransanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an advanced technique for excision of early rectal cancers. Robotic TAMIS (r-TAMIS) has been introduced as technical improvement and potential alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME) in early rectal cancers and in frail patients. This study reports the perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of r-TAMIS for local excision of early-stage rectal cancers.MethodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively collected r-TAMIS database (July 2021–July 2023). Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated.ResultsTwenty patients were included. Median age and body mass index were 69.5 (62.0–77.7) years and 31.0 (21.0–36.5) kg/m2. Male sex was prevalent (n = 12, 60.0%). ASA III accounted for 66.7%. Median distance from anal verge was 7.5 (5.0–11.7) cm. Median operation time was 90.0 (60.0–112.5) minutes. Blood loss was minimal. There were no conversions. Median postoperative stay was 2.0 (1.0–3.0) days. Minor and major complication rates were 25.0% and 0%, respectively. Seventeen (85.0%) patients had an adenocarcinoma whilst three patients had an adenoma. R0 rate was 90.0%. Most tumours were pT1 (55.0%), followed by pT2 (25.0%). One patient (5.0%) had a pT3 tumour. Specimen and tumour maximal median diameter were 51.0 (41.0–62.0) mm and 21.5 (17.2–42.0) mm, respectively. Median specimen area was 193.1 (134.3–323.3) cm2. Median follow-up was 15.5 (10.0–24.0) months. One patient developed local recurrence (5.0%).Conclusionsr-TAMIS, with strict postoperative surveillance, is a safe and feasible approach for local excision of early rectal cancer and may have a role in surgically unfit and elderly patients who refuse or cannot undergo TME surgery. Future prospective multicentre large-scale studies are needed to report the long-term oncological outcomes.