The recognition of a predator through perception of olfactory cues is a widespread phenomenon among mammalian species (Stoddart, 1980a). The influences of predator odors on prey behavior include reduced feeding by deer (Odocoileus) when exposed to fecal odors (Melchiors and Leslie, 1985; Muller-Schwarze, 1972, 1983; Sullivan et al., 1985b), cautious behavior of ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) to predatory snake odor (Henessy and Owings, 1978), and reduced capture of short-tailed voles (Microtus agrestis) exposed to weasel odor (Stoddart, 1976, 1980b, 1982). Sullivan et al. (1985a) reported that feeding behavior of snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus) was suppressed by the urine and anal gland secretions of several predators (Mustelidae). The purposes of this study were to: 1) describe an odor-elicited behavioral interaction between a wolverine (Gulo gulo) and a population of snowshoe hares; and 2) assess the influence of wolverine urine on feeding behavior of hares in a) pen and b) field situations. The original stimulus for this investigation arose from a wolverine attack on hares in live-traps during the final night of a monitoring session (October 1980) on a 9-ha checkerboard trapping grid (100 trap stations located at 30-m intervals with one trap at every other station). This grid was located in a young stand of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) near Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. The wolverine could not remove hares from the cage traps (23 by 23 by 80 cm, Tomahawk Live Trap Co.) but consumed whatever body parts that could be reached. Only traps on one-half (left side) of the 9-ha grid were disturbed. Traps were not cleaned nor moved from their original locations. The presence of a wolverine on the grid, and in the general area, was independently confirmed by tracks and capture of the animal by the local fur trapper. The numbers of hares captured on the left/right halves of the grid prior to the wolverine attack were 21 and 20 in August and 24 and 29 in October, and after the wolverine attack were 0 and 14 in December and 24 and 31 in February. No hares were captured on the wolverine side of the grid during the December trapping session even though tracks in freshly-fallen snow indicated that hares were present. However, snowshoe hares entered traps and were captured on the other ('control') half of the grid. The strength of this avoidance response declined by the February trapping session when comparable numbers of hares were captured on both halves of the grid. There was 15 cm of snow on the ground and overnight low temperatures averaged -250C during the 3-night December trapping session. Therefore, the stimulus causing hares to avoid wolverine-attacked traps was presumably associated with the traps themselves rather than some object in the natural environment which would have been covered by snow. Thus, the traps were possibly marked as territorial or food cache sites by wolverine anal gland secretion, urine, or feces (see Haglund, 1966; Koehler et al., 1980; Pulliainen and Ovaskainen, 1975). If this was the case, one or more odors persisted for 8 weeks from October to December. An alternative explanation was the presence of hare blood on the traps which might have caused the negative response. To determine the effect of the anal gland secretion, urine, and feces of wolverine on the feeding (consumption of willow, Salix spp., browse) behavior of snowshoe hares, a series of pen bioassays was conducted by Sullivan et al. (1985a). Results of these controlled experiments indicated that fecal odor was not effective, anal gland secretion was marginally effective, and urine odor was highly effective in suppressing feeding by hares. Thus, pen and field bioassays designed to assess the effect of wolverine urine odor on consumption of lodgepole pine seedlings (a highly preferred food during spring and autumn) by hares was initiated. In addition, pen bioassays were conducted to assess the effect of a) hare blood and b) black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) urine (sympatric non-predator species) on feeding by hares. Pen bioassays were conducted at the Applied Mammal Research Institute, Langley, British Columbia.
Read full abstract