Amplitude Of Postural Tremor Research Articles

Accelerometric Classification of Resting and Postural Tremor Amplitude.

Clinical rating scales for tremors have significant limitations due to low resolution, high rater dependency, and lack of applicability in outpatient settings. Reliable, quantitative approaches for assessing tremor severity are warranted, especially evaluating treatment effects, e.g., of deep brain stimulation (DBS). We aimed to investigate how different accelerometry metrics can objectively classify tremor amplitude of Essential Tremor (ET) and tremor in Parkinson's Disease (PD). We assessed 860 resting and postural tremor trials in 16 patients with ET and 25 patients with PD under different DBS settings. Clinical ratings were compared to different metrics, based on either spectral components in the tremorband or pure acceleration, derived from simultaneous triaxial accelerometry captured at the index finger and wrist. Nonlinear regression was applied to a training dataset to determine the relationship between accelerometry and clinical ratings, which was then evaluated in a holdout dataset. All of the investigated accelerometry metrics could predict clinical tremor ratings with a high concordance (>70%) and substantial interrater reliability (Cohen's weighted Kappa > 0.7) in out-of-sample data. Finger-worn accelerometry performed slightly better than wrist-worn accelerometry. We conclude that triaxial accelerometry reliably quantifies resting and postural tremor amplitude in ET and PD patients. A full release of our dataset and software allows for implementation, development, training, and validation of novel methods.

Cerebellar Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Essential Tremor Patients with Thalamic Stimulation: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Essential tremor (ET) is a disabling condition resulting from a dysfunction of cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuitry. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) or lesion of the ventral-intermediate thalamic nucleus (VIM) is an effective treatment for severe ET. Transcranial cerebellar brain stimulation has recently emerged as a non-invasive potential therapeutic option. Here, we aim to investigate the effects of high-frequency non-invasive cerebellar transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in severe ET patients already operated for VIM-DBS. Eleven ET patients with VIM-DBS, and 10 ET patients without VIM-DBS and matched for tremor severity, were included in this double-blind proof-of-concept controlled study. All patients received unilateral cerebellar sham-tACS and active-tACS for 10min. Tremor severity was blindly assessed at baseline, without VIM-DBS, during sham-tACS, during and at 0, 20, 40min after active-tACS, using kinetic recordings during holding posture and action ('nose-to-target') task and videorecorded Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) clinical scales. In the VIM-DBS group, active-tACS significantly improved both postural and action tremor amplitude and clinical (FTM scales) severity, relative to baseline, whereas sham-tACS did not, with a predominant effect for the ipsilateral arm. Tremor amplitude and clinical severity were also not significantly different between ON VIM-DBS and active-tACS conditions. In the non-VIM-DBS group, we also observed significant improvements in ipsilateral action tremor amplitude, and clinical severity after cerebellar active-tACS, with a trend for improved postural tremor amplitude. In non-VIM-DBS group, sham- active-tACS also decreased clinical scores. These data support the safety and potential efficacy of high-frequency cerebellar-tACS to reduce ET amplitude and severity.

Design and Simulation of a Passive Absorber to Reduce Measured Postural Tremor Signal.

Tremor is a semirhythmic oscillatory movement of a body part caused by alternating simultaneous contractions of an antagonistic muscle group. Medical and surgical treatments used to reduce the symptoms of involuntary tremor can cause negative side effects. This study examined the ability of passive vibration absorbers in reducing the amplitude of postural tremor (PT). Inertial measurement unit (IMU) was used to record PT signals at the forearm and hand of a patient. IMU signal was used to excite an upper limb modeled to represent the flexion-extension vibrational motion at the joints. Equations of motion were solved numerically to obtain a response that fits the measured tremor signal. Passive tuned mass damper (TMD) was modeled as a cantilever beam and a screw placed along its length, at a position reflecting its operational frequency. Natural frequency of the TMD was derived for different mass positions and validated numerically and experimentally. Modal damping ratio of the TMD, for each mass position, was also estimated. Mass position and damping coefficient of the TMD were optimized depending on the minimization in the power spectral density (PSD) of angular displacement amplitude at the wrist joint. Optimized three-TMD system of 28.64 g total effective mass with the estimated modal damping ratio reduced 83.1% of the PSD of the angular displacement amplitude. This study showed the performance ability of a lightweight passive absorber in controlling the involuntary tremor of a system excited by the measured tremor signal of a patient.

Distractibility predicts favourable response of functional tremor to transcranial magnetic stimulation: An electrophysiological study

BackgroundGeneration of functional tremor relies on the structures involved in the control of voluntary movements. The clinical diagnosis is based on the presence of “positive signs”, which are expression of cognitive and motor distractibility and reflect functional tremor dependence on explicit motor control. In patients who manifest less distractibility, habitual (implicit) control may be of greater significance. Habitual behaviours are inflexible and difficult to eradicate. ObjectivesTo investigate if motor and cognitive distractibility predicts response to treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Methods21 patients with functional tremor underwent 5-day repeated sessions of continuous theta burst stimulation over primary motor cortex. A battery of tests to provoke positive signs was performed during accelerometry recordings and the total functional tremor accelerometry score was calculated for each patient. Response to treatment was measured as change in tremor amplitude, expressed as total power of the spectra between 1 and 30 Hz. ResultsOn the group level, cTBS significantly changed postural tremor amplitude (Z = −1.9; p = 0.05), with the median decrease of 40%, IQR (−90-(+24)). There was a positive correlation between the functional tremor accelerometry score and reduction of postural tremor amplitude with treatment (rs = −0.75, p < 10−3). Responders had higher functional tremor accelerometry scores compared to non-responders (p = 0.001). The total functional tremor accelerometry score was a significant predictor of treatment response (OR = 2.8, p = 0.03; 95% CI 1.1; 7.2). ConclusionsPatients who are more distractible are better candidates for treatment with transcranial magnetic stimulation. The likely explanation is the between-subjects differences on the reliance of functional tremor generation on explicit vs. implicit motor network.

Clinical Characteristics and Electrophysiological Biomarkers of Parkinson's Disease Developed From Essential Tremor.

Background and Objective: Parkinson's disease developed from essential tremor (ET-PD) is a distinct clinical syndrome that is different from essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD). There is currently a lack of research on ET-PD. Tremor characteristics (amplitude and frequency) are primary quantitative indexes for diagnosing and monitoring of tremors. In this study, we aimed to explore specific clinical and electrophysiological biomarkers for the identification of ET-PD.Methods: The study included patients with ET-PD (n = 22), ET (n = 42), and tremor-dominant PD (t-PD, n = 47). We collected demographic data, clinical characteristics (including motor and non-motor symptoms), and tremor analysis. The frequency, amplitude, contracting patterns of resting tremor and postural tremor were collected. The analysis of ET-PD and ET/t-PD was compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the electrophysiological features in distinguishing ET-PD from ET or t-PD.Results: Compared with ET, hyposmia, bradykinesia, rigidity, postural abnormality, and resting tremor were more common in the ET-PD group (P = 0.01, 0.003, 0.001, 0.001, 0.019, respectively). The postural tremor frequencies of the head, upper limbs, and lower limbs were significantly lower in the ET-PD than in the ET (P = 0.007, 0.003, 0.035, respectively), which were the most appropriate variables for distinguishing ET-PD from ET (AUC: 0.775, 0.727, and 0.701, respectively). Compared with t-PD, bradykinesia, rigidity, postural abnormality (both P < 0.001), and resting tremor (P = 0.024) were less common in the ET-PD. The postural tremor amplitudes of the head and upper limbs were significantly higher in the ET-PD than in the t-PD (P = 0.022, 0.001, respectively), which were the most appropriate variables for distinguishing ET-PD from t-PD (AUC: 0.793 and 0.716).Conclusions: Hyposmia and electrophysiological biomarkers (postural tremor frequencies and amplitudes) help early recognition of ET-PD.

Effect of eccentric-based rehabilitation on hand tremor intensity in Parkinson disease.

Hand tremor is a disturbing yet sometimes resistant symptom in persons with Parkinson disease (PD). Although many exercise regimens for these people have gained attention in recent years, the effect of resistance training and especially eccentric training on parkinsonian tremor is still uncertain. This study was conducted to investigate the precise effect of upper limb eccentric training on hand tremor in PD. In this randomized controlled trial, a consecutive sample of 21 persons with PD recruited from general hospitals went through 6 weeks of upper limb pure eccentric training as the intervention group (n = 11) or no additional exercise during this period as the control group (n = 10). Resting and postural tremor amplitudes were measured with the cellphone-based accelerometer. Comparing hand tremor amplitudes before and after the trial showed a significant reduction in resting tremor amplitude in the intervention group after exercise sessions (p < 0.05) while detecting no changes in the control group during 6 weeks of study. Meanwhile, postural tremor amplitude remained unchanged in both groups.

Latency of re-emergent tremor in Parkinson's disease is influenced by levodopa

IntroductionRe-emergent tremor (RET) is a common form of postural tremor observed in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Recent studies have shown that administration of levodopa decreases RET amplitude. However, drug effects on tremor pause duration are less clear. MethodsWe performed a prospective observational study in PD patients with RET, subjected to acute levodopa challenge. Tremor activity was measured during OFF and ON states both clinically, as well as by using accelerometers taped to the back of both hands. Correlation between RET amplitude and pause duration, as well with MDS-UPDRS scores were investigated. The slope of gradual increase of postural tremor after the pause was also measured in the OFF and ON states. ResultsSignificant inverse correlation between tremor amplitude and RET pause duration was observed in OFF (rs = −0.474, p = 0.030) and ON (rs = −0.569, p = 0.006) states. Levodopa reduced tremor amplitude (26%, p = 0.004) dampening slope gradient (22%, p = 0.029). Tremor pause duration also showed inverse correlation with postural tremor amplitude measured by MDS-UPDRS in OFF (rs = −0.311, p = 0.048) and ON (rs = −0.503, p = 0.020) states, as well as with total MDS-UPDRS Part III score (rs = −0.295, p = 0.009). Finally, accelerometric analysis proved to be more sensitive than visual inspection for detecting tremor pauses. ConclusionOur results suggest RET pause duration is amplitude related, since levodopa-induced amplitude decrease led to pause prolongation, associated with decreased tremor intensity and slope gradient dampening.

Tremor analysis separates Parkinson's disease and dopamine receptor blockers induced parkinsonism.

Parkinson's disease, the most common cause of parkinsonism is often difficult to distinguish from its second most common etiology due to exposure to dopamine receptor blocking agents such as antiemetics and neuroleptics. Dual axis accelerometry was used to quantify tremor in 158 patients with parkinsonism; 62 had Parkinson's disease and 96 were clinically diagnosed with dopamine receptor blocking agent-induced parkinsonism. Tremor was measured while subjects rested arms (resting tremor), outstretched arms in front (postural tremor), and reached a target (kinetic tremor). Cycle-by-cycle analysis was performed to measure cycle duration, oscillation amplitude, and inter-cycle variations in the frequency. Patients with dopamine receptor blocker induced parkinsonism had lower resting and postural tremor amplitude. There was a substantial increase of kinetic tremor amplitude in both disorders. Postural and resting tremor in subjects with dopamine receptor blocking agent-induced parkinsonism was prominent in the abduction-adduction plane. In contrast, the Parkinson's disease tremor had equal amplitude in all three planes of motion. Tremor frequency was comparable in both groups. Remarkable variability in the width of the oscillatory cycles suggested irregularity in the oscillatory waveforms in both subtypes of parkinsonism. Quantitative tremor analysis can distinguish Parkinson's disease from dopamine receptor blocking agent-induced parkinsonism.

Heterogeneity of Monosymptomatic Resting Tremor in a Prospective Study: Clinical Features, Electrophysiological Test, and Dopamine Transporter Positron Emission Tomography.

Background:The relationship between monosymptomatic resting tremor (mRT) and Parkinson's disease (PD) remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to assess the function of presynaptic dopaminergic neurons in patients with mRT by dopamine transporter positron emission tomography (DAT-PET) and to evaluate the utility of clinical features or electrophysiological studies in differential diagnosis.Methods:Thirty-three consecutive patients with mRT were enrolled prospectively. The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and electromyography were tested before DAT-PET. Striatal asymmetry index (SAI) was calculated, and a normal DAT-PET was defined as a SAI of <15%. Scans without evidence of dopaminergic deficits (SWEDDs) were diagnosed in patients with a subsequent normal DAT-PET and structural magnetic resonance imaging.Results:Twenty-eight mRT patients with a significant reduction in uptake of DAT binding in the striatum were diagnosed with PD, while the remained 5 with a normal DAT-PET scan were SWEDDs. As for UPRDS, the dressing and hygiene score, walking in motor experiences of daily living (Part II) and motor examination (Part III) were significant different between two groups (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Bilateral tremor was more frequent in the SWEDDs group (P < 0.05). The frequency of resting tremor and the amplitude of postural tremor tend to be higher in the SWEDDs group (P = 0.08 and P = 0.05, respectively).Conclusions:mRT is heterogeneous in presynaptic nigrostriatal dopaminergic degeneration, which can be determined by DAT-PET brain imaging. Clinical and electrophysiological features may provide clues to distinguish PD from SWEDDs.

The nature of tremor circuits in parkinsonian and essential tremor

Tremor is a cardinal feature of Parkinson's disease and essential tremor, the two most common movement disorders. Yet, the mechanisms underlying tremor generation remain largely unknown. We hypothesized that driving deep brain stimulation electrodes at a frequency closely matching the patient's own tremor frequency should interact with neural activity responsible for tremor, and that the effect of stimulation on tremor should reveal the role of different deep brain stimulation targets in tremor generation. Moreover, tremor responses to stimulation might reveal pathophysiological differences between parkinsonian and essential tremor circuits. Accordingly, we stimulated 15 patients with Parkinson's disease with either thalamic or subthalamic electrodes (13 male and two female patients, age: 50-77 years) and 10 patients with essential tremor with thalamic electrodes (nine male and one female patients, age: 34-74 years). Stimulation at near-to tremor frequency entrained tremor in all three patient groups (ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease, P=0.0078, subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease, P=0.0312; ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in essential tremor, P=0.0137; two-tailed paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests). However, only ventrolateral thalamic stimulation in essential tremor modulated postural tremor amplitude according to the timing of stimulation pulses with respect to the tremor cycle (e.g. P=0.0002 for tremor amplification, two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test). Parkinsonian rest and essential postural tremor severity (i.e. tremor amplitude) differed in their relative tolerance to spontaneous changes in tremor frequency when stimulation was not applied. Specifically, the amplitude of parkinsonian rest tremor remained unchanged despite spontaneous changes in tremor frequency, whereas that of essential postural tremor reduced when tremor frequency departed from median values. Based on these results we conclude that parkinsonian rest tremor is driven by a neural network, which includes the subthalamic nucleus and ventrolateral thalamus and has broad frequency-amplitude tolerance. We propose that it is this tolerance to changes in tremor frequency that dictates that parkinsonian rest tremor may be significantly entrained by low frequency stimulation without stimulation timing-dependent amplitude modulation. In contrast, the circuit influenced by low frequency thalamic stimulation in essential tremor has a narrower frequency-amplitude tolerance so that tremor entrainment through extrinsic driving is necessarily accompanied by amplitude modulation. Such differences in parkinsonian rest and essential tremor will be important in selecting future strategies for closed loop deep brain stimulation for tremor control.

Effects of low-frequency thalamic deep brain stimulation in essential tremor patients

BackgroundEssential tremor (ET) patients may present with postural and/or intentional tremor. But despite high-frequency thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) effectively suppressing both, the emergence of intentional tremor has been attributed to a higher extent to cerebellar dysfunction. Therefore, we hypothesized thalamic 10Hz-stimulation, which is known to worsen motor functions, having more impact on intentional tremor than on postural tremor. MethodsIn sixteen ET-patients with bilateral thalamic-DBS, tremor rating scale (TRS) and ultrasound-based tremor-amplitude measurements were analyzed by sequentially applying three DBS-settings in a randomized order: i) low-frequency stimulation (LFS), ii) DBS being turned off (DBS-OFF) and iii) high-frequency stimulation (HFS). Repeated measures analyses of variance for TRS and for the quotients of tremor-amplitudes during DBS-OFF and LFS for intentional (qint) and postural tasks (qpost) were calculated. Finally, electrode localization and the abovementioned quotients were put into relation by Pearson's correlation coefficient. ResultsHFS reduced TRS significantly compared to DBS-OFF and LFS (ps<.001), while the latter two also differed significantly with TRS being the worst during LFS (p<.05). Additionally, intentional tremor-amplitude appeared to be strongly influenced by LFS than postural tremor-amplitude (p<.05). Furthermore, a lower placement of the electrodes caused worse intentional tremor-amplitude during LFS (r=.517, p>.05), while postural tremor-amplitude was unrelated to electrode localization (ps<.05). ConclusionsDuring LFS in ET-patients, there is a more severe exacerbation of intentional tremor compared to postural tremor. Possibly, there are two different mechanisms responsible for both tremor entities, making more refined stimulation regimes feasible in the future.

Low dosage promethazine and loratadine negatively affect neuromotor function

ObjectivesDetermine how the sedating antihistamine promethazine and non-sedating antihistamine loratadine at a dose of 10mg influence voluntary and involuntary motor processes in the hours following ingestion and the morning after ingestion. MethodsEight healthy young adults were recruited into a human double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study. Neuromotor function was examined using a battery of controlled reaction time, postural tremor, and heart rate variability measures. Neuromotor function was assessed 4 times for each of the promethazine, loratadine and placebo interventions; pre-ingestion, 1h post-ingestion, 2h post-ingestion, and the following day. ResultsSelf-perceived levels of drowsiness increased only after ingestion of promethazine. However, both antihistamines had negative effects on simple reaction time, choice reaction time, the RMS and peak power amplitude of postural tremor, and autonomic cardiac regulation. ConclusionsThe presence of selective neuromotor deficits following ingestion of promethazine and loratadine suggest that sedating and non-sedating antihistamines alter neuromotor function. It is possible that the H1 antagonists used in this study have antimuscarinic effects, which may impact on the central dopaminergic system that plays a role in modulating several CNS processes associated with movement. SignificanceAntihistamines are one of the most commonly procured over-the-counter medications. The current study suggests that taking non-sedating antihistamines to avoid the adverse drug reaction of drowsiness may not avoid unwanted motor control side-effects.

Strength and Coordination Training Are Both Effective in Reducing the Postural Tremor Amplitude of Older Adults

The current study investigated the effect of 2 different types of unilateral resistance training on the postural tremor output of 19 neurologically healthy men age 70-80 yr. The strength- (n = 7) and coordination-training (n = 7) groups trained twice a week for 6 wk, performing dumbbell biceps curls, wrist flexions, and wrist extensions, while the control group (n = 5) maintained their normal activities. Changes in index-finger tremor (RMS amplitude, peak, and proportional power) and upper limb muscle coactivation were assessed during 4 postural conditions that were performed separately with the trained and untrained limbs. The 2 training groups experienced significantly greater reductions in mean RMS tremor amplitude, peak, and proportional tremor power 8-12 Hz and upper limb muscle coactivation, as well as greater increases in strength, than the control group. These results further demonstrate the benefits of resistance training for improving function in older adults.

The effect of inertial loading on wrist postural tremor in essential tremor

Determine the effect of inertial loading on the strength of motor unit entrainment and the synergistic/competitive interaction between central and mechanical reflex tremor components in subjects with essential tremor (ET). Twenty-three subjects with ET and 22 controls held their hand in an outstretched position while supporting sub-maximal loads (no-load, 5%, 15% and 25% 1-repetition maximum). Hand postural tremor and wrist extensor neuromuscular activity were recorded. Inertial loading resulted in a reduction in postural tremor in all ET subjects. The largest reduction in tremor amplitude occurred between 5% and 15% loads, which was associated with spectral separation of the mechanical reflex and central tremor components in a large number of ET subjects. Despite an increase in overall neuromuscular activity with inertial loading, EMG tremor spectral power did not increase with loading. The effect of inertial loading on postural tremor amplitude appears to be mediated in large part by its effect on the interaction between mechanical reflex and central tremor components. Also, ET is associated with a constant absolute level of motor unit entrainment. The amplitude of postural tremor is dependent on both central and peripheral factors, with proportionally greater motor unit entrainment occurring at low contraction intensities.

Atypical task-invariant organization of multi-segment tremors in patients with Parkinson’s disease during manual tracking

The objective of the study was to investigate the interplay between involuntary tremulous activities and task performance under volitional control for patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) during position tracking. A volunteer sample of nine untreated patients and nine age-matched healthy subjects participated in this study. They performed a sinusoidal tracking maneuver with a shoulder and a static pointing task; meanwhile, a position trace of the index and accelerometer data in the upper limb were recorded to characterize tracking performance and postural–kinetic tremors. In reference to postural tremor, the kinetic tremor of control subjects during tracking was considerably modulated, leading to a lower regularity and greater spectral deviation. In contrast, patients with PD demonstrated greater postural and kinetic tremors than control subjects, and tremulous movements of the patients were comparatively task-invariant. The prominent coherence peak, which occurred at 8–12 Hz in control subjects, was atypically presented at 5–8 Hz for PD patients with poorer tracking performance. Functionally, congruency of position tracking was related to amplitude of kinetic tremor after subtracting from amplitude of postural tremor. In conclusion, task-dependent organization of tremulous movements was impaired in patients with PD. The inferior tracking performance of the patients correlated implicitly with kinetic tremor, signifying some sharing of neural substrates for manual tracking and tremor generation.

Computerized Tremor Analysis of Valproate‐induced Tremor: A Comparative Study of Controlled‐release versus Conventional Valproate

Valproate (VPA) induces postural tremor in 6-45% of patients. The characteristics of VPA-induced tremor have not yet been quantitatively assessed, and it is not known whether tremor prevalence or severity is affected by VPA formulation (controlled-release CR-VPA vs. conventional VPA). The aim of this study was quantitatively to assess tremor in epilepsy patients receiving VPA and to compare the effects of two VPA formulations (CR-VPA vs. VPA) on tremor severity. In a prospective study, 18 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed focal or generalized epilepsy were assigned to receive alternately either VPA (n=10) or CR-VPA (n=8) monotherapy. Computerized tremor analysis was performed at baseline 1 day before initiating VPA treatment and repeated after a seizure-free period of >or=8 weeks, during which VPA doses had remained stable. Rest and postural tremor were recorded by accelerometry, and surface electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded from the wrist flexors and extensors. At baseline, the two groups had similar postural tremor amplitudes. At follow-up, the CR-VPA group had remained at the same level, whereas VPA subjects exhibited a significant increase in tremor amplitudes (p<0.05) despite comparable VPA doses and comparable plasma VPA concentrations at the time of tremor testing. This is the first study to assess quantitatively VPA-induced tremor by standardized tremor analysis. These results suggest that CR-VPA may cause less tremorigenic activity as compared with standard VPA. The mechanisms underlying this difference are unclear but may include greater peak-trough variation with VPA than with CR-VPA.

Effects of vision and arm position on amplitude of arm postural tremor in patients with multiple sclerosis

Feys P, Helsen WF, Liu X, Lavrysen A, Nuttin B, Ketelaer P. Effects of vision and arm position on amplitude of arm postural tremor in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1031–3. Objectives To quantify the effects of vision and arm position on arm postural tremor, comparisons were made between flexed and extended arm positions performed with the eyes open and closed. Design Case-control study. Setting National multiple sclerosis (MS) center in Belgium. Participants Sixteen patients (32 arms) with MS who had intention tremor and 16 healthy controls (32 arms). Interventions Not applicable. Main outcome measure The amplitude of postural tremor was assessed by a magnetic position sensor attached to the index finger. Results The amplitude of postural tremor was not influenced by changes in visual condition or different arm positions. Both healthy controls and MS patients made more directional changes in the flexed, compared with the extended arm position. Conclusions The amplitude of the arm postural tremor in MS is independent of vision and arm position. Selecting 1 arm position is sufficient to assess postural tremor amplitude.

Sensitivity and specificity of a portable system measuring postural tremor.

A portable, accelerometric system measuring tremor was evaluated. That is, the validity and consistency of measurements as well as its ability to discriminate pathologic from physiological tremor were investigated. Control subjects and patients with Parkinson's disease were tested with this portable system and with an independent system that gave precise displacement data using lasers. It was found that amplitude of postural tremor as measured by the two systems differed significantly, but further investigation revealed that this difference was due 1) to the difference between amplitude of acceleration and amplitude of displacement, and 2) to changes in tremor over the time between tests, rather than to any inaccuracy or unreliability in the portable system. The other characteristics of tremor reported by the portable system were also valid and reasonably reliable in test-retest experiments, with the exception of the "harmonic index," which proved less stable. Most of the reported characteristics were distributed differently for the control group and for the patients with Parkinson's disease, but the large overlaps between distributions would make diagnosis difficult when tremor is not very pronounced. These results suggest that until better discriminating measures of tremor are available, tremor tests should be repeated and combined with other tests of motor function.

The tremometer: a convenient device to measure postural tremor from lithium and other causes

Tremor resists quantification of the ordinary level of clinical observation, where an objective record of tremor severity is desirable to evaluate patients' statements about effects of medication or pathophysiological states. The tremometer is an easily made device that measures amplitude of postural tremor in any radial direction by a graded series of round holes in which a probe is held and contact (which closes a circuit with an indicator light) is avoided. The observation of various types and features of tremor may be aided by the tremometer.

Tremors in early Parkinson's disease.

We examined 50 untreated parkinsonian patients with a complaint of tremor for the presence of a resting, postural, or kinetic tremor. Tremors were recorded by an accelerometer to determine amplitude and frequency. A postural tremor was present in 92% and a resting tremor in 76%. The amplitude of postural tremor was greater than resting tremor in 50%, the same in 25%, and less in 25%. The average tremor frequency of resting and postural tremor was not significantly different. Carbidopa/levodopa reduced testing tremor in 58% and postural tremor in 46% of patients. The dopamine agonist naxoglide (PHNO) reduced resting tremor in 77% and postural tremor in 70% of patients. Postural tremor was not worsened by either drug. It is concluded that tremors in both the resting and postural positions are an integral part of the symptoms of Parkinson's disease and that both tremors have a similar frequency and pharmacological responsiveness in the early phases of the disease.