Amount Of Ion Release Research Articles

Nickel ion release from dental alloys in two different mouthwashes.

Background. Mouthwashes are widely used as adjuncts to mechanical oral hygiene procedures. Nonetheless, there is little information regarding the effect of various mouthwashes on the amount of ions released from the nickel-chromium (Ni‒Cr) alloys used in the fabrication of fixed prostheses. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of two types of mouthwash on the release of Ni ions from dental alloys. Methods. Forty-two disk-shaped specimens were prepared with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 2 mm. Two mouthwashes were examined in this study: Oral B and Listerine. A control group was also considered using distilled water. Each Ni‒Cr disk was immersed in the mouthwashes and distilled water in polypropylene test tubes, and then incubated at 37°C to simulate the oral temperature. After 45 days of incubation, the samples were tested for Ni ions using inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Data were analyzed using ANOVA. Results. In the Halita group subjects exhibited 2.04±0.65 reduction in OLS. OLS reduction in the chlorhexidine group was 1.95±0.74. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion. As the results indicated, the amount of ion release was within the safe limits in the two experimental groups. However, it is recommended that prescribe Listerine mouthwash should not be prescribed for the patients with a history of Ni allergy.

Evaluation of Ion Release from Four Dental Sealants.

The purpose of this study was to determine the ion release from four commercially available pit-and-fissure sealants [3M Clinpro, 3M Concise™, BeautiSealant (BS), and GI FX-II)]. With each brand, 18 specimens were prepared. Their fluoride release in de-ionized water was measured by fluoride electrode, while the release of silicate (Si), aluminum (Al), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), strontium (Sr), and phosphorus (P) was measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28. The result showed that fluoride was not released from 3M Concise™. GI FX-II displayed the largest fluoride release, which, however, dropped rapidly on day 3. 3M Clinpro exhibited less fluoride release than GI FX-II and BS did. At any time during the 28-day experimental period, GI FX-II released more Na than the other sealants (P<0.001). BS ranked the second in Na release, and a small amount of Na ions was released from the 3M Clinpro and 3M Concise™ samples. Al ions were only detected from BS and GI FX-II, but not from the 3M Clinpro and 3M Concise™. Additionally GI FX-II had the largest Si release among the four brands at any time during the experimental period (P<0.001). Ca ions were detected from 3M Clinpro and 3M Concise™, but not from GI FX-II. BS released more Sr than the other sealants at any time during the experimental period (P<0.001). All the samples released similar amounts of P continuously during these 28 days. In conclusion, based on the type and the amount of ion release, BS is the best pit-and-fissure sealant among the four brands.

Release of nickel and chromium ions from orthodontic wires following the use of teeth whitening mouthwashes

BackgroundCorrosion resistance is an important requirement for orthodontic appliances. Nickel and chromium may be released from orthodontic wires and can cause allergic reactions and cytotoxicity when patients use various mouthwashes to whiten their teeth. Our study aimed to assess the release of nickel and chromium ions from nickel titanium (NiTi) and stainless steel (SS) orthodontic wires following the use of four common mouthwashes available on the market.MethodsThis in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 120 orthodontic appliances for one maxillary quadrant including five brackets, one band and half of the required length of SS, and NiTi wires. The samples were immersed in Oral B, Oral B 3D White Luxe, Listerine, and Listerine Advance White for 1, 6, 24, and 168 h. The samples immersed in distilled water served as the control group. Atomic absorption spectroscopy served to quantify the amount of released ions.ResultsNickel ions were released from both wires at all time-points; the highest amount was in Listerine and the lowest in Oral B mouthwashes. The remaining two solutions were in-between this range. The process of release of chromium from the SS wire was the same as that of nickel. However, the release trend in NiTi wires was not uniform.ConclusionsListerine caused the highest release of ions. Listerine Advance White, Oral B 3D White Luxe, and distilled water were the same in terms of ion release. Oral B showed the lowest amount of ion release.

In vitro investigation of aluminum and fluoride release from compomers, conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements: A standardized approach

The amount of fluoride release from dental cements necessary for an anticariogenic effect is not established; moreover, the possible toxic effects due to high fluoride and aluminum release are not well known and the results are still controversial. The aim of our study was to evaluate fluoride (F) and aluminum (Al) release from dental cements using a 'standardized approach' according to the end-use of the materials, i.e. biocompatibility testing. Two polyacid-modified resin composites of recent application, commonly called compomers (Dyract® and Dyract Cem®), were compared with two conventional acid-based (Fuji I™, Ketac-Cem®) and two resin-modified (Vitremer™, Vitrebond™) glass-ionomer cements (GICs). All types of cement are used in dentistry and are commercially available. Extracts of the cements into minimum essential medium, after setting over a 1-h (group A) and 1-week (group B) period, were performed. The extraction conditions were rigorously standardized. Mean values +/- standard deviation of F- and Al-levels in such extracts were measured and were expressed as μg g-1 (micrograms of ions per gram of cement). A great difference in the amount of ion release, both F and Al, was shown among the tested materials. The GICs, as well as Ketac-Cem®, released more F and Al than the compomers. All of the materials released the greatest proportion of ions when the extraction was performed in the first hour after mixing (group A). Al- and F-values showed a highly significant positive correlation, independently from the curing time. We conclude that the biological assessment of dental cements can be performed only if a preevaluation of the leachables is obtained by applying a standardized protocol which allows a useful comparison between the different materials.