AbstractConformational energy computations were carried out on collagenlike triple‐stranded conformations of several poly(tripeptide)s with the general structure CH3CO(GlyXY)3NHCH3. The sequences considered had various amino acid residues in position X or Y of the central tripeptide, with either Pro or Ala as a neighbor, i.e., Gly‐X‐Pro, Gly‐X‐Ala, Gly‐Pro‐Y, and Gly‐Ala‐Y. Minimum‐energy conformations were computed for the side chains, and their distributions were compared for the four sequences. The residues used were Abu (= α‐aminobutyric acid), Leu, Phe, Ser, Asp, Asn, Val, Ile, and Thr. The conformational energy of a Ch2CH3 side chain in Abu was mapped as a function of the dihedral angle χ1. Intrastrand interactions with neighboring residues do not affect the conformations of a side chain in position Y, and they have a minor effect on it in the X‐Ala sequence, but they strongly restrict the conformational freedom of the side chain in the X‐Pro sequence. Conversely, interstrand interactions do not affect side chains in position X, but they strongly restrict the conformational freedom of a side chain in position Y if there is a nearby Pro residue in a neighboring strand. Hydrogen bonds with the backbone can be formed in some conformations of long polar side chains, such as Asp, Asn, or Gln. All amino acid residues can be accommodated in collagen. Because of the interactions mentioned above, steric and energetic constraints can be correlated with observed preferences of certain amino acids for positions X or Y in collagen. Hence, these preferences may be explained, in part, in terms of differences in the conformational freedom of the side chains in the triple‐stranded structure.