: Various guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cow's milk allergy (CMA) have been pu- blished. : This study aimed to compare voting outcomes of experts from Mexico, the Middle East, and the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) on statements regarding CMA. : The 3 expert groups voted on the same 10 state- ments. Each participant voted anonymously using a score of 0-9 (≥6 meant agreement; <5 reflected disagreement). If <75% of the participants agreed with the statement, it was rejected. None of the groups was aware of the voting outcomes of another group. : There was broad consensus amongst the 3 groups. Agreement was reached that infant colic as a sin- gle manifestation is not suggestive of CMA. All groups confirmed that an extensively hydrolysed formula is the preferred elimination diet in mild/moderate CMA cases; however, hydrolysed rice formula is an alternative. Amino acid-based formulas should be reserved for infants with severe symptoms. The discrepancy in voting outcomes re- garding soy formulas highlights the differences in opinions. Two of 13 ESPGHAN experts (15%), 1 of 14 Middle East experts (7%), and 6 of 26 Mexican experts (23%) disagreed with the statement that soy formula should not be the first choice for the diagnostic elimination diet but can be considered in some cases for economic, cultural, and pala- tability reasons. All of the ESPGHAN and Mexican ex- perts agreed that there was no added value of probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics to the efficacy of elimination diets on CMA, whereas 3 of 14 Middle East experts (21%) deter- mined that there was sufficient evidence. : Although all statements were accepted by the 3 groups, there were relevant differences illustrating va- riations according to geography, culture, cost, and formula availability. These findings emphasize the need for region-specific guidelines.
Read full abstract