CBE—Life Sciences EducationVol. 12, No. 4 Letters to the EditorFree AccessPULSE Vision & Change RubricsKaren M. Aguirre, Teresa C. Balser, Thomas Jack, Katherine E. Marley, Kathryn G. Miller, Marcy P. Osgood, Pamela A. Pape-Lindstrom, and Sandra L. RomanoKaren M. Aguirre*Department of Biology, Coastal Carolina University, Conway, SC 29528Search for more papers by this author, Teresa C. BalserSoil and Water Science Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611Search for more papers by this author, Thomas JackAddress correspondence to: Thomas Jack (E-mail Address: [email protected]).Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755Search for more papers by this author, Katherine E. MarleyDepartment of Biology, Doane College, Crete, NE 68333Search for more papers by this author, Kathryn G. MillerDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130Search for more papers by this author, Marcy P. OsgoodDepartment of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131Search for more papers by this author, Pamela A. Pape-LindstromBiology Department, Everett Community College, Everett, WA 98201Search for more papers by this author, and Sandra L. RomanoDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of the Virgin Islands, St. Thomas, VI 00802Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:13 Oct 2017https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.13-09-0183AboutSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Dear Editor:We want to inform CBE—Life Sciences Education readers about the release of the first version of the Partnership for Undergraduate Life Sciences Education (PULSE) Vision & Change Rubrics (available at the PULSE Community website: www.pulsecommunity.org). These rubrics were written and assembled by the PULSE Vision & Change Leadership Fellows to help stimulate the widespread adoption of the principles outlined in the 2011 National Academy of Sciences report Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action (American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS], 2011). Initially, these rubrics can be utilized for departmental self-assessment. In the longer term, the rubrics are intended serve as the basis of a tiered certification program for life sciences departments based on Vision and Change principles.In 2006, the National Science Foundation (NSF) initiated a multi-year conversation with the undergraduate life sciences community, with assistance from the AAAS. That conversation, cosponsored by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIH/NIGMS) and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), resulted in the release of the Vision and Change report in 2011 (AAAS, 2011). Among the recommendations in the Vision and Change report was recognition that a 21st-century education requires modifications of faculty incentive systems, academic departmental support, how curricular decisions are determined, and biology education pedagogy. In 2012, the NSF, NIH/NIGMS, and HHMI founded the Partnership for Undergraduate Life Sciences Education, or PULSE, to catalyze implementation of Vision and Change principles across all institutions of higher education. The PULSE community, open to all life sciences educators, now hosts more than 1000 members. Forty Vision and Change Leadership Fellows selected from among biologists with leadership roles at institutions of higher education of all types were charged with developing strategies to promote systemic changes in life sciences education.The PULSE initiative is intended to catalyze change at the departmental and institutional levels by initiating and implementing new strategies to assist departments and institutions to move toward a shared vision and effect curricular transformation (Manning, 2013). Decisions regarding curriculum, hiring, teaching assignments, faculty evaluations, mentoring, and faculty development are typically made at the department level. Thus, a concerted effort at this level is needed to overcome the widespread resistance to change (Savkar and Lokere, 2010; Anderson et al., 2011). During the past year, the 40 PULSE Leadership Fellows have designed and begun to implement several initiatives to facilitate educational transformation in life sciences departments. One of these initiatives, the PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, is described briefly here.The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics articulate fundamental criteria for evaluating the level and degree of departmental adoption of the principles of Vision and Change. These rubrics assess department or program alignment with Vision and Change recommendations in five broad areas: curriculum alignment, assessment, faculty practice/faculty support, infrastructure, and climate for change. Each rubric has several categories with multiple criteria to be assessed (see Figure 1 for a sample rubric). The rubric descriptors designate different levels of implementation of Vision and Change principles from first steps to full departmental transformation. The set of rubrics has been designed for flexible use by undergraduate life sciences departments at a broad range of institution types including 2-yr colleges, 4-yr liberal arts institutions, regional comprehensive institutions, and research institutions.Figure 1. Sample from the PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics. The rubrics are organized with separate criteria listed on the left, with levels of achievement across the top, from zero (no achievement) to four (exemplary achievement). In total, 69 separate criteria are assessed in five broad categories: curriculum alignment, assessment, faculty practice/faculty support, infrastructure, and climate for change.We expect that the PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics will be used for a variety of purposes, including departmental self-assessment, engagement of senior academic administrators, and as the basis for a departmental certification program. Initially, the rubrics can provide a structure and “road map” for departmental reflection regarding a host of topics relevant to implementation of Vision and Change recommendations. A goal of the rubrics is to provide a basic framework of expectations, such that evidence of adoption of Vision and Change principles can be gathered and self-assessed by departments and a road map for continued transformation can be charted. We anticipate that the rubrics themselves can serve as an assessment tool to examine how changes in departmental practices over time affect student outcomes. Longer term, we intend the rubrics to serve as the basis for a tiered certification program for undergraduate life sciences departments that have adopted some or all of the principles outlined in the Vision and Change report. Certification will serve both to reward departments that have made substantial progress in implementing Vision and Change, and to incentivize departments that have been slow to adopt these changes.An underlying assumption of the PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics is that higher scores resulting from excellent/exemplar level of achievement will result in better student outcomes. At present, this is only a hypothesis, and we and others who use the rubrics will gather data to test this hypothesis. This evidence will guide future revisions of the PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, to ensure that they reflect the criteria that “really matter” to improve student learning.We are very interested in receiving feedback from the biology education community. This is most easily done via the PULSE Community website or by contacting one of the authors directly. During the past year of development, we have done our best to include the most relevant criteria for capturing and recognizing departmental efforts, but it is likely we have omitted key items or areas. We are depending on the community to provide feedback so as to make the rubrics as effective as possible. We anticipate that the rubrics will be revised over the next year, and we expect them to evolve in future years based on evidence of their effectiveness and changing standards of knowledge and practice in undergraduate life sciences education.MATERIALS FOR DEPARTMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ONGOING REFORMThe PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics are available for download from the PULSE Community website: www.pulsecommunity.org.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe thank Ellen Goldey and Judy Awong-Taylor for comments and discussions. The work of the PULSE Vision & Change Leadership Fellows has been supported by a joint effort of the NSF, NIH/NIGMS, and HHMI. Specifically, work to develop the PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics was supported by NSF grants DBI-1350120 and DBI-1323223.REFERENCES American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, Washington, DC. Google Scholar Anderson WA, et al. (2011). Changing the culture of science education at research universities. Science 331, 152-153. Medline, Google Scholar Manning K (2013). Organizational Theory in Higher Education, New York: Routledge. Google Scholar Savkar V, Lokere J (2010). Time to Decide: The Ambivalence of the World of Science toward Education, Cambridge, MA: Nature Education. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byTensions between depth and breadth: an exploratory investigation of chemistry assistant professors’ perspectives on content coverage1 January 2023 | Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol. 24, No. 2The PULSE Diversity Equity and Inclusion (DEI) Rubric: a Tool To Help Assess Departmental DEI EffortsJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol. 23, No. 3Development of the biotic impacts of climate change core concepts (BIC 4 ) framework29 April 2022 | Environmental Education Research, Vol. 28, No. 8Teaching Successful Student Collaboration Within the Context of Biological Experimentation12 May 2022PLOS ONE, Vol. 17, No. 7Professional skills for physiology majors: defining and refiningAdvances in Physiology Education, Vol. 44, No. 4Putting the guidelines to work: moving from undergraduate physiology curricular guidelines to program development and improvementAdvances in Physiology Education, Vol. 44, No. 4Resources for Teaching and Assessing the Vision and Change Biology Core ConceptsJanet L. Branchaw, Pamela A. Pape-Lindstrom, Kimberly D. Tanner, Sarah A. Bissonnette, Tawnya L. Cary, Brian A. Couch, Alison J. Crowe, Jenny K. Knight, Katharine Semsar, Julia I. Smith, Michelle K. Smith, Mindi M. Summers, Caroline J. Wienhold, Christian D. Wright, and Sara E. BrownellCynthia Brame, Monitoring Editor1 May 2020 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 19, No. 2A qualitative analysis to identify the elements that support department level change in the life sciences: The PULSE Vision & Change Recognition Program30 May 2019 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 14, No. 5Experiential Trips to Help Appalachian Students Persist toward Primary Degrees in the SciencesJournal of Appalachian Studies, Vol. 25, No. 1GenBio-MAPS: A Programmatic Assessment to Measure Student Understanding of Vision and Change Core Concepts across General Biology ProgramsBrian A. Couch, Christian D. Wright, Scott Freeman, Jennifer K. Knight, Katharine Semsar, Michelle K. Smith, Mindi M. Summers, Yi Zheng, Alison J. Crowe, and Sara E. BrownellJohn Coley, Monitoring Editor25 January 2019 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 18, No. 1The Graph Rubric: Development of a Teaching, Learning, and Research ToolAakanksha Angra and Stephanie M. GardnerJennifer Knight, Monitoring Editor29 November 2018 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 17, No. 4Active Learning in Flipped Life Science Courses Promotes Development of Critical Thinking SkillsMelanie L. Styers,Peter A. Van Zandt,, and Katherine L. HaydenErin L. Dolan, Monitoring Editor24 July 2018 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 17, No. 3Reading Quizzes Improve Exam Scores for Community College StudentsPamela Pape-Lindstrom,Sarah Eddy, and Scott FreemanJeff Schinske,, Monitoring Editor11 May 2018 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 17, No. 2Collectively Improving Our Teaching: Attempting Biology Department–wide Professional Development in Scientific TeachingMelinda T. Owens,Gloriana Trujillo,Shannon B. Seidel,Colin D. Harrison,Katherine M. Farrar,Hilary P. Benton,J. R. Blair,Katharyn E. Boyer,Jennifer L. Breckler,Laura W. Burrus,Dana T. Byrd,Natalia Caporale,Edward J. Carpenter,Yee-Hung M. Chan,Joseph C. Chen,Lily Chen,Linda H. Chen,Diana S. Chu,William P. Cochlan,Robyn J. Crook,Karen D. Crow,José R. de la Torre,Wilfred F. Denetclaw,Lynne M. Dowdy,Darleen Franklin,Megumi Fuse,Michael A. Goldman,Brinda Govindan,Michael Green,Holly E. Harris,Zheng-Hui He,Stephen B. Ingalls,Peter Ingmire,Amber R. B. Johnson,Jonathan D. Knight,Gretchen LeBuhn,Terrye L. Light,Candace Low,Lance Lund,Leticia M. Márquez-Magaña,Vanessa C. Miller-Sims,Christopher A. Moffatt,Heather Murdock,Gloria L. Nusse,V. Thomas Parker,Sally G. Pasion,Robert Patterson,Pleuni S. Pennings,Julio C. Ramirez,Robert M. Ramirez,Blake Riggs,Rori V. Rohlfs,Joseph M. Romeo,Barry S. Rothman,Scott W. Roy,Tatiane Russo-Tait,Ravinder N. M. Sehgal,Kevin A. Simonin,Greg S. Spicer,Jonathon H. Stillman,Andrea Swei,Leslie C. Tempe,Vance T. Vredenburg,Steven L. Weinstein,Andrew G. Zink,Loretta A. Kelley,Carmen R. Domingo, and Kimberly D. TannerC. Gary Reiness, Monitoring Editor22 March 2018 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 17, No. 1How do undergraduate STEM mentors reflect upon their mentoring experiences in an outreach program engaging K-8 youth?10 February 2017 | International Journal of STEM Education, Vol. 4, No. 1Conceptual Elements: A Detailed Framework to Support and Assess Student Learning of Biology Core ConceptsTawnya Cary, and Janet BranchawMichèle Shuster, Monitoring Editor13 October 2017 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 16, No. 2The PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics, Version 1.0: A Valid and Equitable Tool to Measure Transformation of Life Sciences Departments at All Institution TypesLoretta Brancaccio-Taras, Pamela Pape-Lindstrom, Marcy Peteroy-Kelly, Karen Aguirre, Judy Awong-Taylor, Teri Balser, Michael J. Cahill, Regina F. Frey, Thomas Jack, Michael Kelrick, Kate Marley, Kathryn G. Miller, Marcy Osgood, Sandra Romano, J. Akif Uzman, and Jiuqing ZhaoDebra Tomanek, Monitoring Editor13 October 2017 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 15, No. 4PULSE Pilot Certification ResultsJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol. 16, No. 2The ASM Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Microbiology: A Case Study of the Advocacy Role of Societies in Reform EffortsJournal of Microbiology & Biology Education, Vol. 16, No. 1Scientific Teaching: Defining a Taxonomy of Observable PracticesBrian A. Couch, Tanya L. Brown, Tyler J. Schelpat, Mark J. Graham, and Jennifer K. KnightMichèle Shuster, Monitoring Editor13 October 2017 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 14, No. 1Feedback about Teaching in Higher Ed: Neglected Opportunities to Promote ChangeCara Gormally, Mara Evans, and Peggy BrickmanDiane K. O'Dowd, Monitoring Editor13 October 2017 | CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 13, No. 2 Vol. 12, No. 4 December 01, 2013577-723 Metrics Downloads & Citations Downloads: 382Citations: 22 History Information© 2013 K. M. Aguirre et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2013 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0).ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe thank Ellen Goldey and Judy Awong-Taylor for comments and discussions. The work of the PULSE Vision & Change Leadership Fellows has been supported by a joint effort of the NSF, NIH/NIGMS, and HHMI. Specifically, work to develop the PULSE Vision & Change Rubrics was supported by NSF grants DBI-1350120 and DBI-1323223.PDF download