Ideally, [jazz] listener listened intently enough join improviser's trance. That was understood as listener's job, listener's act of creation. This made possible a depth of thought.... indefinite personality of narrator in Toni Morrison's novel, Jazz, invokes two of author's central concerns in creation of African American literature. On one hand, through both indeterminacy and self-questioning of narrative I, she compels her readers, whatever their ethnic background, engage in a thorough self-exploration, or, in her own words, to examine centers of self and ... compare those centers with `raceless' ones with which we are, all of us, most familiar (Morrison qtd. in Hulbert 46). On other hand, narrating voice's indeterminacy enacts in a most forceful way novelist's notion of African American modernity. Morrison once observed ... [that] `a modernity which overturns pre-war definitions ushers in Jazz Age (an age defined by Afro-American art and culture), and requires new kinds of intelligences define oneself.' Efforts shape identity became newly `complex, contradictory, evasive, independent, liquid' (Hulbert 46). Morrison's way of encouraging us on this difficult quest, then, is invite us write novel with her as we are reading it, (re-)create novel, and by same token (re-)shape ourselves. In that sense, she offers reader opportunity become protagonist of his/her version of Jazz. To a large extent, this invitation arises from spaces that both direct reference jazz music and slipperiness of narrator's identity and personality open for readers. very title vividly evokes in our mind fluid, hybrid musical form which evolved primarily in urban African American communities. This polyrhythmic music is characterized by its extensive use of improvisation and call-and-response patterns in connection with audience participation. As for Jazz's storyteller, he/she keeps his/her identity veiled in mystery throughout book, since he/she never names him/herself. In fact, as soon as we touch our copy of novel and turn first two leaves, we find ourselves confronted with question of first person narrator's identity. Indeed, epigraph itself rings out with a self-definition of an unnamed subject: am name of sound and sound of name. am sign of letter and designation of division. reader's only, tenuous clue is that these four lines come from Nag Hammadi, more precisely, from fundamentally paradoxical, anonymous self-proclamation known as The Thunder, Perfect Mind. And as our hands keep turning pages beginning of story, narrative voice softly calls out us: Sth, know that (1). Such an opening sentence instantaneously establishes orality and aurality of novel. Moreover, it activates a sense of immediacy: narrator is addressing someone who is looking at same scene as he/she is, in a tone of gossipy friendliness between speaker and reader who thus turns listener and eyewitness. As we begin wonder about nature of relationship between Jazz's storyteller and epigraph's I, we note that even gender of narrator is open discussion. Several reviewers have claimed or implied that narrative voice is that of a woman given gossipy quality of novel. However, this appears be first a misconception due those critics' forgetting that numerous story-tellers in both African and African American oral traditions have been male. Furthermore, whereas Ann Hulbert assumes without further ado that the novel's garrulous narrative `I' is appropriating I of epigraph (46), many reviewers actually express astonishment or puzzlement at difficulty they have in identifying narrator. …
Read full abstract