Reflecting:Two Decades of portal Editorials and Accomplishments Ellysa Stern Cahoy (bio) As portal's new editor (as of January 2023), I am finding inspiration in reflection as I excavate our journal's rich history to uncover future possibilities. Reading portal's past editorials (published in each issue since the journal's inception in 2001) is a fascinating way to better understand not only portal's successful trajectory over the past two-plus decades, but also the issues and challenges our profession as a whole has faced and largely conquered. Widely recognized as the father of reflective practice, the philosopher and educator John Dewey wrote, "Reflective thinking is always more or less troublesome because it involves overcoming the inertia that inclines one to accept suggestions at their face value; it involves willingness to endure a condition of mental unrest."1 A more recent researcher on the power of reflection, Carol Rodgers, defined the act of reflection itself as "a meaning-making process that moves a learner from one experience into the next with deeper understanding of its relationships with and connections to other experiences and ideas." She asserts that reflection should happen in interaction with others and that it requires an attitude attuned to personal and professional growth and change.2 The "mental unrest" and "meaning making" that Dewey and Rodgers describe is at the heart of all academic work. With engaged students, learning is almost always uncomfortable, because it involves internal challenge and personal growth. The act of reflection, a partner in the learning process, is ideally incorporated throughout all phases of a creative, intellectual process, including the production of scholarly work. As I explored two decades of portal editorials, I saw multiple instances of reflection and "meaning making"—librarians confronting tough issues in our profession and looking toward creative solutions, as well as the "mental unrest" that comes when one is within a problem and the solution, while ahead, is not yet in sight. Our journal's first editorial, "Through portal," written by inaugural managing editor Gloriana St. Clair, does not mention the "mental unrest" and the coalescing event behind portal's founding—the 1999 purchase of the Journal of Academic Librarianship's publisher by Elsevier, resulting in higher subscription costs and an imperative for LIS [End Page 223] researchers to assume leadership in scholarly publishing.3 She does, however, identify three core objectives for the nascent publication: • To offer an affordable alternative to serials that have gone up an average of 9 percent a year while the consumer price index increased only 3.3 percent; • To provide a more inviting, constructive, and productive environment for authors; • To model a scholarly communications system as outlined in recent pronouncements from the Association of American Universities (AAU) and the Create Change initiative.4 These imperatives persist today. EBSCO's recently released 2022 Serials Price Projection Report indicates that for research and academic libraries, journal prices have increased more than 18 percent over the past four years (2018–2022).5 Open access research publishing is growing and provides alternatives, but deep challenges remain. St. Clair also discusses her initiation of portal's mentoring program, which was originally designed to provide intensive support from "the moment (authors) decide to engage in research to the moment when they elect to submit the finished product either to portal or to some other journal."6 Individual mentoring was provided by seasoned librarians active in the American Library Association's Library Administration and Management Association Research Committee and the Library Research Round Table. Executive editor Charles Lowry, also a portal founding editor, described the impact of the mentoring program in 2004 as "advanc(ing) a new idea that a manuscript may be raw, but if it contains the core of good research the author deserves more than a rejection. Thus we extend mentoring to help develop good ideas and good research into viable publishable articles."7 portal's mentoring program flourishes to the present day in the form of our Editorial Board's double-blind peer review of refereed articles. When an article is submitted to portal for peer-reviewed consideration, the conversation begins. Each reviewer provides unique and developmental feedback on an article under consideration...
Read full abstract