American Heart Association Scientific Statement Research Articles

Management of Patients at Risk for and With Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Despite the many advances in cardiovascular medicine, decisions concerning the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombus often remain challenging. There are only limited organizational guideline recommendations with regard to LV thrombus. Furthermore, management issues in current practice are increasingly complex, including concerns about adding oral anticoagulant therapy to dual antiplatelet therapy, the availability of direct oral anticoagulants as a potential alternative option to traditional vitamin K antagonists, and the use of diagnostic modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, which has greater sensitivity for LV thrombus detection than echocardiography. Therefore, this American Heart Association scientific statement was commissioned with the goals of addressing 8 key clinical management questions related to LV thrombus, including the prevention and treatment after myocardial infarction, prevention and treatment in dilated cardiomyopathy, management of mural (laminated) thrombus, imaging of LV thrombus, direct oral anticoagulants as an alternative to warfarin, treatments other than oral anticoagulants for LV thrombus (eg, dual antiplatelet therapy, fibrinolysis, surgical excision), and the approach to persistent LV thrombus despite anticoagulation therapy. Practical management suggestions in the form of text, tables, and flow diagrams based on careful and critical review of actual study data as formulated by this multidisciplinary writing committee are given.

Evaluation of telephone-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation recommendations for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Aim of the studyWhile out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is associated with poor survival, early bystander CPR (B-CPR) and telephone CPR (T-CPR) improves survival from OHCA. American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Statements outline recommendations for T-CPR. We assessed these recommendations and hypothesized that meeting performance standards is associated with increased likelihood of survival. Additional variables were analyzed to identify future performance measurements. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of non-traumatic, adult, OHCA using the Singapore Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study. The primary outcome was likelihood of survival; secondary outcomes were pre-hospital Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) and B-CPR. ResultsFrom 2012 to 2016, 2,574 arrests met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 68 ± 15; of 2,574, 1,125 (44%) received T-CPR with 5% (135/2574) survival. T-CPR cases that met the Lerner et al. performance metrics analyzed, demonstrated no statistically significant association with survival. Cases which met the Kurz et al. criteria, “Time for Dispatch to Recognize Need for CPR” and “Time to First Compression,” had adjusted odds ratios of survival of 1.01 (95% CI:1.00, 1.02; p = <0.01) and 0.99 (95% CI:0.99, 0.99; p = <0.01), respectively. Identified barriers to CPR decreased the odds of T-CPR and B-CPR being performed. Patients with prehospital ROSC had higher odds of B-CPR being performed. EMS response time < 8 minutes was associated with increased survival among patients receiving T-CPR. ConclusionAHA scientific statements on T-CPR programs serve as ideal starting points for increasing the quality of T-CPR systems and patient outcomes. More work is needed to identify other system performance measures.

Psychological Outcomes and Interventions for Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Although resilience and high quality of life are demonstrated by many individuals with congenital heart disease, a range of significant psychological challenges exists across the life span for this growing patient population. Psychiatric disorders represent the most common comorbidity among people with congenital heart disease. Clinicians are becoming increasingly aware of the magnitude of this problem and its interplay with patients' physical health, and many seek guidance and resources to improve emotional, behavioral' and social outcomes. This American Heart Association scientific statement summarizes the psychological outcomes of patients with congenital heart disease across the life span and reviews age-appropriate mental health interventions, including psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. Data from studies on psychotherapeutic, educational' and pharmacological interventions for this population are scarce but promising. Models for the integration of mental health professionals within both pediatric and adult congenital heart disease care teams exist and have shown benefit. Despite strong advocacy by patients, families' and health care professionals, however, initiatives have been slow to move forward in the clinical setting. It is the goal of this scientific statement to serve as a catalyst to spur efforts for large-scale research studies examining psychological experiences, outcomes, and interventions tailored to this population and for integrating mental health professionals within congenital heart disease interdisciplinary teams to implement a care model that offers patients the best possible quality of life.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Children and Adolescents: 2022 Update: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents has markedly increased since publication of the last American Heart Association scientific statement on pediatric ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in 2014. In addition, there has also been significant expansion of the evidence base for use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the pediatric population, including new data linking ambulatory blood pressure levels with the development of blood pressure-related target organ damage. Last, additional data have recently been published that enable simplification of the classification of pediatric ambulatory monitoring studies. This scientific statement presents a succinct review of this new evidence, guidance on optimal application of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the clinical setting, and an updated classification scheme for the interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children and adolescents. We also highlight areas of uncertainty where additional research is needed.

2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Abstract EP57: A Non-exercise Prediction Of Cardiorespiratory Fitness For Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Data From The Fitness Registry And The Importance Of Exercise International Database (FRIEND)

Introduction: The importance of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) for stratifying mortality risk and guiding clinical care in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well-established. An American Heart Association Scientific Statement suggests routine clinical assessment of CRF using non-exercise prediction equations when direct assessment from a cardiopulmonary exercise test is not feasible. However, current prediction equations have been created from cohorts of apparently healthy individuals. Hypothesis: A CVD-specific non-exercise equation would have higher accuracy for predicting CRF compared to an equation developed from a cohort without known CVD. Methods: Participants from the Fitness Registry and Importance of Exercise International Database (FRIEND) with a diagnosis of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), myocardial infarction (MI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or heart failure (HF) who performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test were studied (83% [10,417 of 12,578] male; age 62.7 ± 10.3 years). The cohort (12,578 tests; 49% [6,190] treadmill tests) was split into development (10,062) and validation (2,516) groups. The prediction equation was developed using multiple regression analysis and comparisons were made with a CRF prediction equation developed on an apparently healthy cohort using FRIEND. Results: Age, sex, height, body mass, exercise mode, and CVD diagnosis were all significant predictors of CRF. The regression equation was: CRF (mL/kg/min) = 17.03 – (0.21 * age [years]) + (3.60 * sex [male = 1; female = 0]) + (0.12 * height [cm]) – (0.11 * body mass [kg]) + (3.75 * mode [treadmill = 1; cycle = 0]) – (2.40 * CABG [yes = 1, no = 0]) – (0.29 * MI [yes = 1, no = 0]) + (0.75 * PCI [yes = 1, no = 0]) – (3.90 * HF [yes = 1, no = 0]) (adjusted R 2 = 0.42, SEE = 4.74 mL/kg/min). When compared to measured CRF in the validation group (19.6 ± 6.2 mL/kg/min), predicted CRF was similar for the CVD equation (19.8 ± 4.1 mL/kg/min [101%]) and higher for the healthy cohort equation (28.2 ± 7.0 mL/kg/min [144%]; P &lt;0.05). Significant Pearson correlations were found when using either prediction equation although the correlation when using the CVD equation was higher (r = 0.65) than that for the healthy cohort equation (r = 0.48, P &lt;0.05). Differences between equations were also observed for root mean square error (4.7 and 10.9 mL/kg/min for the CVD and healthy cohort equations, respectively). Conclusions: As hypothesized, the CVD-specific non-exercise equation was a better predictor of CRF in a cohort of individuals with CVD. The new equation for individuals with CVD provided a lower mean error between measured and predicted CRF than an equation developed from an apparently healthy cohort. Thus, population specific equations are needed for predicting CRF; however, the error associated with non-exercise prediction equations suggests CRF should be directly measured whenever feasible.

Update on cardiogenic shock: The evolving landscape of a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach.

The American Heart Association scientific statement on cardiogenic shock and the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative have provided the impetus to advance knowledge and development of national guidelines for cardiogenic shock. We evaluate the current state of knowledge surrounding cardiogenic shock and limitations to the development of national guidelines.

Comprehensive Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in patients with diabetes. Cardiovascular disease in diabetes is multifactorial, and control of the cardiovascular risk factors leads to substantial reductions in cardiovascular events. The 2015 American Heart Association and American Diabetes Association scientific statement, "Update on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Light of Recent Evidence," highlighted the importance of modifying various risk factors responsible for cardiovascular disease in diabetes. At the time, there was limited evidence to suggest that glucose-lowering medications reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. At present, several large randomized controlled trials with newer antihyperglycemic agents have been completed, demonstrating cardiovascular safety and reduction in cardiovascular outcomes, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure. This AHA scientific statement update focuses on (1) the evidence and clinical utility of newer antihyperglycemic agents in improving glycemic control and reducing cardiovascular events in diabetes; (2) the impact of blood pressure control on cardiovascular events in diabetes; and (3) the role of newer lipid-lowering therapies in comprehensive cardiovascular risk management in adults with diabetes. This scientific statement addresses the continued importance of lifestyle interventions, pharmacological therapy, and surgical interventions to curb the epidemic of obesity and metabolic syndrome, important precursors of prediabetes, diabetes, and comorbid cardiovascular disease. Last, this scientific statement explores the critical importance of the social determinants of health and health equity in the continuum of care in diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

A Foot Soldier in Cardiac Metabolism: A Conversation With Heinrich Taegtmeyer, MD, DPhil.

A Foot Soldier in Cardiac Metabolism: A Conversation With Heinrich Taegtmeyer, MD, DPhil.

Clinical Implications for Exercise at Altitude Among Individuals With Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

An increasing number of individuals travel to mountainous environments for work and pleasure. However, oxygen availability declines at altitude, and hypoxic environments place unique stressors on the cardiovascular system. These stressors may be exacerbated by exercise at altitude, because exercise increases oxygen demand in an environment that is already relatively oxygen deplete compared with sea‐level conditions. Furthermore, the prevalence of cardiovascular disease, as well as diseases such as hypertension, heart failure, and lung disease, is high among individuals living in the United States. As such, patients who are at risk of or who have established cardiovascular disease may be at an increased risk of adverse events when sojourning to these mountainous locations. However, these risks may be minimized by appropriate pretravel assessments and planning through shared decision‐making between patients and their managing clinicians. This American Heart Association scientific statement provides a concise, yet comprehensive overview of the physiologic responses to exercise in hypoxic locations, as well as important considerations for minimizing the risk of adverse cardiovascular events during mountainous excursions.

Visual Diagnosis: Abnormal Behavior in a 2-month-old Boy.

Visual Diagnosis: Abnormal Behavior in a 2-month-old Boy.

Assessing and Addressing Cardiovascular Health in People Who Are Transgender and Gender Diverse: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

There is growing evidence that people who are transgender and gender diverse (TGD) are impacted by disparities across a variety of cardiovascular risk factors compared with their peers who are cisgender. Prior literature has characterized disparities in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as a result of a higher prevalence of health risk behaviors. Mounting research has revealed that cardiovascular risk factors at the individual level likely do not fully account for increased risk in cardiovascular health disparities among people who are TGD. Excess cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is hypothesized to be driven in part by psychosocial stressors across the lifespan at multiple levels, including structural violence (eg, discrimination, affordable housing, access to health care). This American Heart Association scientific statement reviews the existing literature on the cardiovascular health of people who are TGD. When applicable, the effects of gender-affirming hormone use on individual cardiovascular risk factors are also reviewed. Informed by a conceptual model building on minority stress theory, this statement identifies research gaps and provides suggestions for improving cardiovascular research and clinical care for people who are TGD, including the role of resilience-promoting factors. Advancing the cardiovascular health of people who are TGD requires a multifaceted approach that integrates best practices into research, health promotion, and cardiovascular care for this understudied population.

Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are increasing in prevalence worldwide. Atrial fibrillation can precipitate and can be a consequence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and cardiomyopathy. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure, when present together, are associated with worse outcomes. Together, these 2 conditions increase the risk of stroke, requiring oral anticoagulation in many or left atrial appendage closure in some. Medical management for rate and rhythm control of atrial fibrillation in heart failure remain hampered by variable success, intolerance, and adverse effects. In multiple randomized clinical trials in recent years, catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction has shown superiority in improving survival, quality of life, and ventricular function and reducing heart failure hospitalizations compared with antiarrhythmic drugs and rate control therapies. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in management toward nonpharmacological rhythm control of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The primary objective of this American Heart Association scientific statement is to review the available evidence on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation in relation to heart failure and to provide guidance on the latest advances in pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The writing committee's consensus on the implications for clinical practice, gaps in knowledge, and directions for future research are highlighted.

Improving outcomes in opioid-associated cardiac arrest

Improving outcomes in opioid-associated cardiac arrest

Perioperative Implications of the 2020 American Heart Association Scientific Statement on Drug-Induced Arrhythmias—A Focused Review

The recently released American Heart Association (AHA) scientific statement on drug-induced arrhythmias discussed medications commonly associated with bradycardia, supraventricular tachycardias, and ventricular arrhythmias. The foundational data for this statement were collected from general outpatient and inpatient populations. Patients undergoing surgical and minimally invasive treatments are a unique subgroup, because they may experience hemodynamic changes associated with anesthesia and their procedure, receive multiple drug combinations not given in either inpatient or outpatient settings, or experience postprocedural inflammatory syndromes. Accordingly, the generalizability of the AHA scientific statement to this perioperative population is unclear. This focused review highlights important aspects of the new AHA scientific statement and their application to the perioperative setting. The authors review medications frequently encountered and given by anesthesiologists and their risk of drug-induced arrhythmias and discuss common anesthetic and adjunctive medications and their associated risks of bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, torsades de pointes, and drug-induced Brugada syndrome. In many instances, the risk of arrhythmia reported by the AHA scientific statement in the general population appeared to be higher than found in perioperative arenas. Furthermore, the authors discuss the arrhythmia risk of additional medications commonly ordered or administered by anesthesiologists that are not included in the AHA scientific statement. As patient and procedural complexity increases and novel anesthetic combinations propagate, further research and observational studies will be required to delineate further perioperative risks for drug-induced arrhythmia.

A Primary Care Agenda for Brain Health: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

A healthy brain is critical for living a longer and fuller life. The projected aging of the population, however, raises new challenges in maintaining quality of life. As we age, there is increasing compromise of neuronal activity that affects functions such as cognition, also making the brain vulnerable to disease. Once pathology-induced decline begins, few therapeutic options are available. Prevention is therefore paramount, and primary care can play a critical role. The purpose of this American Heart Association scientific statement is to provide an up-to-date summary for primary care providers in the assessment and modification of risk factors at the individual level that maintain brain health and prevent cognitive impairment. Building on the 2017 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association presidential advisory on defining brain health that included "Life's Simple 7," we describe here modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline, including depression, hypertension, physical inactivity, diabetes, obesity, hyperlipidemia, poor diet, smoking, social isolation, excessive alcohol use, sleep disorders, and hearing loss. These risk factors include behaviors, conditions, and lifestyles that can emerge before adulthood and can be routinely identified and managed by primary care clinicians.

Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation (CORE) Exercise Prescription and Programming: A PRACTICAL GUIDE.

Patients with cancer almost universally report diminished health-related quality of life. Many patients experience persistent fatigue and most have below-average exercise capacities. Despite the publication of exercise guidelines for cancer survivors that encourage physical activity, few patients exercise on a regular basis. Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of death in early-stage malignancies. Exercise training has been demonstrated to decrease cardiovascular events in patients with cancer. In addition, regular exercise improves exercise capacity, reduces fatigue, and improves quality of life in cancer survivors. A 2019 American Heart Association scientific statement, endorsed by the American Cancer Society, provided a framework and rationale for partnering with existing multidimensional, interdisciplinary outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programs to provide supervised exercise training and risk factor control services for patients with cancer and cancer survivors: cardio-oncology rehabilitation. In addition, the American College of Sports Medicine has published recommendations for cancer exercise training. This article provides practical suggestions for incorporating patients with cancer into cardiac rehabilitation and for patient-specific exercise prescription. Illustrative patient case examples are provided.

Is Developmental Screening Enough in High-Risk Populations?

In this issue of Pediatrics, Sananes et al1 leverage the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial to describe developmental and behavioral concerns in a cohort of children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and related single right ventricle conditions. The Pediatric Heart Network recognized the importance of conducting developmental screening as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)2,3 in this population at high risk for neurodevelopmental concerns.The researchers evaluate how well a diagnostic developmental evaluation at 14 months of age, with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II,4 and developmental screening at 3, 4, and 5 years of age, with the Ages & Stages Questionnaire (ASQ),5 predicted the outcome of “developmental functioning” as measured by the Adaptive Score on the Behavior Assessment System for Children-2 (BASC-2)6 at 6 years of age.There were some correlations between early developmental evaluations and later outcomes at age 6 years, such as a “failure” (scoring 2 SDs below the mean) on the Psychomotor Developmental Index of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II at age 14 months having a relatively good sensitivity (0.79) to identify lower adaptive skills at 6 years of age. In general, however, researchers in this study found that scores on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II at 14 months had a low positive predictive value for the BASC-2 Adaptive Scores at age 6 years. Some domains of the ASQ, including the personal-social, problem-solving, and communication scales, were correlated with 6-year-old BASC-2 Adaptive Scores, with “fail” ratings for problem-solving and personal-social domains at age 4 to 5 years having PPVs ranging from 75 to 93. Additionally, rates of parent-reported behavior problems on the BASC-2 were significantly higher at age 6 than at younger ages.It is helpful to understand specific domains and tasks that assessment tools measure. The BASC-2 is a broad-based behavioral rating scale and measures different constructs than the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II and ASQ and differs from other measures of adaptive functioning.A signature developmental profile described in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) involves a “low severity, high prevalence” pattern of deficits.7 Thus, children may have mild deficits across numerous domains of development and behavior that subsequently culminate in impairments in day-to-day functioning. More subtle challenges in attention regulation and executive functioning are common in children with CHD and may not present functional impact until school-age. These concepts underscore the importance of in depth, multidisciplinary diagnostic evaluations at critical time points in development as recommended in the AAP-approved American Heart Association scientific statement on neurodevelopmental evaluation and treatment7 and guidelines for incorporating formal neurodevelopmental follow-up programs into cardiac care.8 Targeted neurodevelopmental evaluations should be conducted in addition to ongoing AAP-recommended developmental screening and surveillance for all children.2,3In this study, it was reassuring that more than three-quarters of children who passed the ASQ screening at younger ages subsequently scored within the average range on BASC-2 at age 6 years. Authors of this study raise important issues about developmental screening, surveillance, and evaluation in children with CHD as well as other high-risk pediatric populations, including those with conditions and risk factors associated with neurologic injury and developmental delay or disability). These issues include the following:The work of Sananes et al1 has implications for pediatric and surgical specialties. Implementing developmental screening within populations known to be at high risk can serve as a touchpoint to discuss developmental implications of chronic diseases as well as offer hope and support. When children have been diagnosed with developmental delays or are known to be at risk for delays, a proactive developmental support approach is important. A blended approach including developmental surveillance, screening, and diagnostic evaluations is logical. Unlike with many medical conditions, a named diagnosis is not required for a child to access and benefit from developmental interventions such as physical, occupational, and speech-language therapy and Part C Early Intervention programming.

Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

As clinicians delivering health care, we are very good at treating disease but often not as good at treating the person. The focus of our attention has been on the specific physical condition rather than the patient as a whole. Less attention has been given to psychological health and how that can contribute to physical health and disease. However, there is now an increasing appreciation of how psychological health can contribute not only in a negative way to cardiovascular disease (CVD) but also in a positive way to better cardiovascular health and reduced cardiovascular risk. This American Heart Association scientific statement was commissioned to evaluate, synthesize, and summarize for the health care community knowledge to date on the relationship between psychological health and cardiovascular health and disease and to suggest simple steps to screen for, and ultimately improve, the psychological health of patients with and at risk for CVD. Based on current study data, the following statements can be made: There are good data showing clear associations between psychological health and CVD and risk; there is increasing evidence that psychological health may be causally linked to biological processes and behaviors that contribute to and cause CVD; the preponderance of data suggest that interventions to improve psychological health can have a beneficial impact on cardiovascular health; simple screening measures can be used by health care providers for patients with or at risk for CVD to assess psychological health status; and consideration of psychological health is advisable in the evaluation and management of patients with or at risk for CVD.

Abstract 228: Evaluation of Telephone-Assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance Recommendations for Out-Of-Hospital Sudden Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Telephone-assisted CPR (T-CPR) may improve bystander CPR (B-CPR) rates and survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). The American Heart Association (AHA) has specified performance measures to ensure rapid provision of T-CPR instructions. Few studies have examined whether these individual T-CPR recommendations are associated with SCA outcomes. Objectives: We sought to assess whether the 2012 AHA Scientific Statement’s T-CPR evaluation metrics are associated with increased B-CPR and survival from SCA. We hypothesized that recognition of arrest and compliance with the T-CPR protocol will result in increased likelihood of B-CPR. Methods: We conducted a retrospective assessment of non-traumatic SCAs from the Singapore T-CPR Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcomes Study. We modeled the likelihood of receipt of B-CPR and survival to hospital discharge controlling for potential confounders. Exposure variables were identified from the Scientific Statement including adherence to T-CPR algorithms, dispatcher recognition of need for CPR, barriers to CPR (yes/no), and time intervals. Results: From 7/2012-2016, the Singapore T-CPR registry contained 3,224 adjudicated SCA events. Mean age was 67±19, 62% of the patients were male, and 87% of the arrests occurred in the home; of these arrests, 75% received T-CPR and 4% survived to hospital discharge. Compliance with the T-CPR protocol algorithm was not associated with an increased likelihood of B-CPR and survival (p=ns, both). Dispatcher recognition of the need for CPR was associated with a 24.9 (12.9-47.9) increased likelihood of B-CPR p&lt;0.01, but was not associated with survival (OR: 1.77(0.37-8.45)). Recognized barriers to CPR were associated with a lower likelihood of B-CPR and survival (p&lt;0.05, both). B-CPR was associated with a 2.40 (1.04-5.45) increased likelihood of survival (p=0.04). Call time to dispatch of EMS of &lt;2 min was associated with a 1.33 (1.07-1.67) p=0.01 increased likelihood of receipt of B-CPR. Conclusion: Rapid dispatch of EMS (&lt;2 min) and successful recognition of need for CPR increased the likelihood of B-CPR. B-CPR was associated with a two-fold increased likelihood of survival. Future work should consider refining T-CPR evaluation metrics using a data driven approach.