American College Of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Research Articles

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Surge on Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Study.

The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, including surgical care. While many studies examined the effect of the pandemic on different patient outcomes, there are none to date examining the impact of the pandemic surge on surgical outcomes. Our aim is to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 surges on surgical outcomes using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. A single-center retrospective analysis of 7436 patients who underwent surgery between February 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Patients were divided into those who underwent surgery during the surge of the pandemic (n = 1217) or outside that period (n = 6219). Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and morbidity. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality, operation time, transfusion, reoperation, and specific postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used in our analysis. All analyses were conducted using the software "R" version 4.2.1. Statistical significance was set at α = .05 level. After adjusting for confounders, we found no significant difference in 30-day mortality and morbidity (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: .89-1.226, P = .5173) or 30-day mortality only (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: .788-2.14, P = .1364) between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes. Sensitivity analyses yielded similar results to the multivariable logistic regression. We found no evidence of increased 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery during the COVID-19 surges compared to those undergoing surgery outside that period. Our results suggest that surgical care was maintained despite the challenges of the pandemic surges.

Sex-Stratified Predictors of Prolonged Operative Time and Hospital Admission in Outpatient Parathyroidectomy.

Our retrospective database study investigatessex-stratified predictors of prolonged operative time (POT) and hospital admission following parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). The 2016 to 2018 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried for patients with PHPT undergoing parathyroidectomy. Cases analyzed were all outpatient status, arrived from home, coded as non-emergent, and elective. POT was defined by the 75th percentile. Hospital admission was defined as LOS 1day. Univariate and multivariable binary logistic regressions were utilized. Of 7442 cases satisfying inclusion criteria, the majority were female (78.0%) and White (78.5%). Median OT (IQR) for females and males was 77 (58-108) and 81 (61-109) minutes, respectively (P = 0.003). 1965 (33.9%) females and 529 (32.3%) males required hospital admission. Independent predictors of POT included ASA class III/IV (aOR 1.342, 95% CI 1.007-1.788) and obesity (aOR 1.427, 95% CI 1.095-1.860) for males (P < 0.05). Independent predictors of hospital admission included age (aOR 1.008, 95% CI 1.002-1.014), ASA class III/IV (aOR 1.490, 95% CI 1.301-1.706), obesity (aOR 1.309, 95% CI 1.151-1.489), dyspnea (aOR 1.394, 95% CI 1.041-1.865), chronic steroid use (aOR 1.674, 95% CI 1.193-2.351), and COPD (aOR 1.534, 95% CI 1.048-2.245) for females (P < 0.05); and ASA class III/IV (aOR 1.931, 95% CI 1.483-2.516) and bleeding disorder (aOR 2.752, 95% CI 1.443-5.247) for males (P < 0.005). In conclusion,predictors of POT and hospital admission following parathyroidectomy for PHPT differed by patient sex. Identifying patients at risk for POT and hospital admission may optimize healthcare resourceutilization. Level of Evidence: IV. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04444-3.

Comparison of the Acute Postoperative Complications Between Isolated Talonavicular Versus Talonavicular and Subtalar (Double) Arthrodesis in Flatfoot Deformity.

Both isolated talonavicular arthrodesis and talonavicular and subtalar (such as double) arthrodesis can be effective treatments for adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) with good success rates, but double arthrodesis has become more commonly performed in recent years. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether isolated talonavicular versus talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis led to significantly different 30-day postoperative complication rates in patients with AAFD. We performed a retrospective review to identify a large cohort of adult patients with the diagnosis of AAFD or posterior tibial tendon deformity (PTTD) who underwent isolated talonavicular or talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis between 2006 and 2020 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). To investigate whether there was a difference in complication rate between the 2 surgical cohorts, we estimated logistic regression models and log-binomial models on each of the outcomes while also adjusting for sex and age. We found that there was no significant difference in the rate of major complications (P = .567) or readmissions (P = .567) between patients who underwent isolated talonavicular versus talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis for AAFD. However, there was a significantly higher rate of minor complications in patients who underwent isolated talonavicular arthrodesis when compared with patients who underwent talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis (P = .009). This study found that there was no increased risk of 30-day postoperative complications or readmissions with talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis when compared with isolated talonavicular arthrodesis for AAFD. In addition, there was no increased risk of major complications for talonavicular and subtalar arthrodesis when compared with isolated talonavicular arthrodesis, and isolated talonavicular arthrodesis actually carried a higher risk of minor complications for this surgical cohort. This may provide valuable information for surgeons considering surgical treatment for a particular case of AAFD. Level III.

Improving Statewide Post-Operative Sepsis Performance Measurement Using Hospital Risk Adjustment Within a Surgical Collaborative.

Background: The Georgia Quality Improvement Program (GQIP) surgical collaborative participating hospitals have shown consistently poor performance in the post-operative sepsis category of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data as compared with national benchmarks. We aimed to compare crude versus risk-adjusted post-operative sepsis rankings to determine high and low performers amongst GQIP hospitals. Patients and Methods: The cohort included intra-abdominal general surgery patients across 10 collaborative hospitals from 2015 to 2020. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) sepsis definition was used among all hospitals for case abstraction and NSQIP data were utilized to train and validate a multivariable risk-adjustment model with post-operative sepsis as the outcome. This model was used to rank GQIP hospitals by risk-adjusted post-operative sepsis rates. Rankings between crude and risk-adjusted post-operative sepsis rankings were compared ordinally and for changes in tertile. Results: The study included 20,314 patients with 595 cases of post-operative sepsis. Crude 30-day post-operative sepsis risk among hospitals ranged from 0.81 to 5.11. When applying the risk-adjustment model which included: age, American Society of Anesthesiology class, case complexity, pre-operative pneumonia/urinary tract infection/surgical site infection, admission status, and wound class, nine of 10 hospitals were re-ranked and four hospitals changed performance tertiles. Conclusions: Inter-collaborative risk-adjusted post-operative sepsis rankings are important to present. These metrics benchmark collaborating hospitals, which facilitates best practice exchange from high to low performers.

Preoperative Chronic Steroid Use is Associated with Increased Incidence of Postoperative Mortality and Limb Loss following Peripheral Arterial Bypass Surgery for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

Steroids are a commonly prescribed medication in the United States and have been associated with poor surgical and treatment outcomes. The objective of this study is to assess the relationship between chronic steroid use and surgical outcomes of femoropopliteal and femoral-distal bypasses in patients suffering from chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). All adult patients undergoing femoropopliteal and femoral-distal bypasses with single segment autologous vein with an indication of CLTI in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) between 2012 and 2021 were stratified between chronic preoperative steroid use (Group I) and no preoperative use (Group II). Primary outcomes of the study included 30-day mortality, amputation, and combined outcome of mortality and/or limb loss. Secondary outcomes included specific bypass related, cardiovascular, respiratory and renal outcomes. A total of 8,324 patients (66.8% Male, 33.2% Females) underwent peripheral arterial bypass operations for the indication of chronic limb threatening ischemia. The median age was 68 years. Group I included 408 patients (4.9%) and Group II included 7,916 patients (95.1%). As compared to patients in Group II, those in Group I were more likely to be females (Group I: 42.2% vs. Group II: 32.8%), more likely to have co-existing COPD (Group I: 20.6% vs. Group II: 11.8%), less likely to be diabetic (Group I: 45.9% vs. Group II: 48%), less likely to be smokers (Group I: 30.6% vs. Group II: 45.4%) and more likely to be in ASA III or IV Classes (Group I: 98% vs. Group II: 96.5%) (all p<0.05). Primary outcomes were as follows: 30-day mortality (Group I: 3.3% vs. Group II: 1.7%), amputation (Group I: 5.9% vs. Group II: 2.8%), 30-day mortality and/or amputation (Group I: 9.1% vs. Group II: 4.5%) (all p<0.05). Among secondary outcomes, the following were found to be statistically significant: untreated loss of patency (Group I: 4.2% vs. Group II: 1.7%), significant bleeding (Group I: 26.2% Vs. Group II: 16.5%), wound infection/complication (Group I: 18.6% vs. Group II: 15%), and return to OR (Group I: 21.8% vs. Group II: 16.7%) (all p<0.05). As compared to patients with an indication of tissue loss (Rutherford's class V and VI), patients in Group I with an indication of rest pain (Rutherford's class IV) were more likely to experience 30-day mortality, major amputation and a composite of mortality and amputation. Risk adjusted analysis showed that chronic steroid use has a statistically significant effect on 30-day mortality (AOR 1.7, p=0.05), amputation (AOR 2.05, p<0.001), composite outcomes of mortality and amputation (AOR 1.959, p<0.001), untreated loss of patency (AOR 2.31, p=0.002), bleeding (AOR 1.33, p<0.011) and unplanned return to the OR (AOR 1.36, p=0.014). Chronic steroid use in patients undergoing femoropopliteal or femoral-distal bypass is associated with a higher risk of 30-day mortality, major amputation, readmission, bleeding, return to operating room, and untreated loss of patency. No significant difference in outcomes were appreciated in patients with chronic steroid use and with Rutherford class V or VI disease (tissue loss), suggesting that the effects of steroids may be less prominent in those with the most advanced peripheral arterial disease. These findings may aid physicians with risk stratification and preoperative discussions regarding open revascularization in patients receiving chronic steroid therapy. More studies including randomized trials are needed to guide perioperative management of steroids in this cohort.

Deadliness of Traumatic Subdural Hematomas in the First Quarter of the Year: A Measurement by the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP).

Background Traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH) is a surgical emergency and has been associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, it is not known whether mortality from ASDH occurs more frequently in a particular season. Methodology We queried the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) from 2016 to 2019. They were identified in the NSQIP using the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) code S06.5 to capture all admissions with a primary diagnosis of traumatic subdural hematoma. Mortality rates were reviewed per season, defined as three consecutive months in the year. Demographics such as age, race, ethnicity, height, and weight were reviewed. Comorbidities such as diabetes, risk factors, including smoking history, and hospitalization characteristics, such as admission year, operation year, and inpatient/outpatient treatment type, were also reviewed. Results A total of 1,656 patients were included in this study. The mean age of all participants was 70.6 years, with 37% (604/1,656) being female. The mortality rate was highest in January, February, and March at 24.5% (104/425, P= 0.045) of admitted patients compared to mortality rates of 18.8% (70/373) in April to June, 18.4% (81/441) in July to September, and 17.5% (73/417) in October to December. Conclusions Mortality is significantly greater during the winter months of January, February, and March among patients with ASDH. Despite better survival rates of ASDH over the past two decades, postoperative mortality rates still remain high.

The frailty-driven predictive model for failure to rescue among patients who experienced a major complication following cervical decompression and fusion: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of 3,632 cases (2011–2020)

BACKGROUND CONTEXTPreoperative risk stratification for patients considering cervical decompression and fusion (CDF) relies on established independent risk factors to predict the probability of complications and outcomes in order to help guide pre and perioperative decision-making. PURPOSEThis study aims to determine frailty's impact on failure to rescue (FTR), or when a mortality occurs within 30 days following a major complication. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGCross-sectional retrospective analysis of retrospective and nationally-representative data. PATIENT SAMPLEThe American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all CDF cases from 2011-2020. OUTCOME MEASURESCDF patients who experienced a major complication were identified and FTR was calculated as death or hospice disposition within 30 days of a major complication. METHODSFrailty was measured by the Risk Analysis Index-Revised (RAI-Rev). Baseline patient demographics and characteristics were compared for all FTR patients. Significant factors were assessed by univariate and multivariable regression for the development of a frailty-driven predictive model for FTR. The discriminative ability of the predictive model was assessed using a receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTSThere were 3632 CDF patients who suffered a major complication and 7.6% (277 patients) subsequently expired or dispositioned to hospice, the definition of FTR. Independent predictors of FTR were nonelective surgery, frailty, preoperative intubation, thrombosis or embolic complication, unplanned intubation, on ventilator for >48 hours, cardiac arrest, and septic shock. Frailty, and a combination of preoperative and postoperative risk factors in a predictive model for FTR, achieved outstanding discriminatory accuracy (C-statistic = 0.901, CI: 0.883–0.919). CONCLUSIONPreoperative and postoperative risk factors, combined with frailty, yield a highly accurate predictive model for FTR in CDF patients. Our model may guide surgical management and/or prognostication regarding the likelihood of FTR after a major complication postoperatively with CDF patients. Future studies may determine the predictive ability of this model in other neurosurgical patient populations.

Predictors and outcomes of same day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

ObjectiveTo assess trends over time of same day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy in oncology, identify perioperative factors influencing same day discharge, and evaluate 30 day postoperative morbidity.MethodsA retrospective cohort...

Nationally Representative Trends in Incidence of Procedures Done Concomitantly With Primary and Revision Total Ankle From 2012 to 2020

Background As new literature emerges and practice patterns fluctuate, there is a significant potential for variation with regard to adjunctive procedures performed with primary total ankle arthroplasty (pTAA) and revision total ankle arthroplasty (rTAA). Our study aims to evaluate yearly trends in the incidence of concomitant procedures and compare the incidence of adjunctive procedures between pTAA and rTAA. Methods The 2012-2020 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried for all pTAA and rTAA. The number of concurrent procedures was compared between pTAA and rTAA and compared across years available in the most current version of the NSQIP database (2012-2020). Results Patients undergoing pTAA had a higher mean age than patients undergoing rTAA (64 vs 61 years; P &lt; .001), and patients undergoing rTAA had higher wound class (P &lt; .001), indicating higher levels of contamination. Concurrent procedures were performed significantly less frequently with pTAA than rTAA (mean procedures 0.82 vs 1.30; P &lt; .001). Removal of deep implants was more commonly coded with rTAA than pTAA (9.0% vs 17.7%; P &lt; .001). Gastrocnemius recession was more frequently performed with pTAA than rTAA (10.4% vs 3.0%; P = .001). Conclusion As pTAA and rTAA increase in incidence throughout the United States, there is increased importance on furthering our understanding of these procedures. This study provides a nationally representative analysis of adjunctive procedures with pTAA and rTAA from 2012 to 2020. Generally, more adjunctive procedures are performed with rTAA versus pTAA, confirming the high complexity of rTAA. Levels of Evidence: Level III

Racial disparities in surgical outcomes after mastectomy in 223000 female breast cancer patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Breast cancer mortality and treatment differ across racial groups. It remains unclear whether such disparities are also reflected in perioperative outcomes of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy. The authors reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2008-2021) to identify female patients who underwent mastectomy for oncological purposes. The outcomes were stratified by five racial groups (white, Black/African American, Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) and included 30-day mortality, reoperation, readmission, surgical and medical complications, and non-home discharge. The study population included 222947 patients, 68% ( n =151522) of whom were white, 11% ( n =23987) Black/African American, 5% ( n =11217) Asian, 0.5% ( n =1198) American Indian/Alaska Native, and 0.5% ( n =1018) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. While 136690 (61%) patients underwent partial mastectomy, 54490 (24%) and 31767 (14%) women received simple and radical mastectomy, respectively. Overall, adverse events occurred in 17222 (7.7%) patients, the largest portion of which were surgical complications ( n =7246; 3.3%). Multivariable analysis revealed that being of Asian race was protective against perioperative complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.71; P <0.001], whereas American Indian/Alaska Native women were most vulnerable to the complication occurrence (OR=1.41; P <0.001). Black/African American patients had a significantly lower risk of medical (OR=0.59; P <0.001) and surgical complications (OR=0.60; P <0.001) after partial and radical mastectomy, respectively, their likelihood of readmission (OR=1.14; P =0.045) following partial mastectomy was significantly increased. The authors identified American Indian/Alaska Native women as particularly vulnerable to complications following mastectomy. Asian patients experienced the lowest rate of complications in the perioperative period. The authors' analyses revealed comparable confounder-adjusted outcomes following partial and complete mastectomy between Black and white races. Their findings call for care equalization in the field of breast cancer surgery.

Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Outcomes in Diverticular Disease Undergoing Elective Colectomy—A Retrospective Cohort Study from the ACS-NSQIP Database

Recommendations for elective colectomies after recovery from uncomplicated acute diverticulitis should be individualized. The kinds of associated risk factors that should be considered for this approach remain undetermined. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative outcomes in patients with diverticular disease after receiving an elective colectomy. This is a retrospective study using the multi-institutional, nationally validated database of the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). The patients who were diagnosed with diverticular disease and received an elective colectomy were included in our risk factor analyses. Postoperative mortality, morbidity, and overall complications were measured. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to demonstrate the risk factors. We analyzed 30,468 patients with diverticular disease, 67% of whom received an elective colectomy. The rate of 30-day mortality was 0.2%, and superficial surgical site infection was the most common postoperative morbidity (7.2%) in the elective colectomies. The independent risk factors associated with overall complications were age ≥ 75, BMI ≥ 30, smoking status, dyspnea, hypertension, current kidney dialysis, chronic steroid use, ASA III, and open colectomy. In laparoscopic colectomy, 67.5% of the elective colectomies, the associated risk factors associated with overall complications still included age ≥ 75, smoking, hypertension, chronic steroid use, and ASA III. Identification of patient-specific risk factors may inform the decision-making process for elective colectomy and reduce the postoperative complications after mitigation of those risk factors.

Are There Racial Differences in the Rate of Surgical Site Infection Based on Surgical Subspecialty?

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common, morbid post-operative complication. We hypothesized the presence of racial differences in SSI rates, comparing black/African American (BAA) to white non-Hispanic (WNH) patients. Patients and Methods: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2017), BAA and WNH surgery patients across 10 surgical specialties were identified: general surgery (GS), vascular surgery (VS), cardiac surgery (CS), thoracic surgery (TS), orthopedics (OS), neurosurgery (NS), urology (US), otolaryngology (ENT), plastic surgery (PS), and gynecology (GYN). The primary outcome was SSI rate (superficial, deep incisional, or organ/space). The secondary outcome was rate of non-surgical infection. Pearson χ2 and Fisher exact tests were used to test group differences of categorical variables. Continuous variables were tested with the Student t-test, or Mann-Whitney U test, with statistical significance set at a value of p < 0.05. Multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to analyze the association between race/ethnicity and the infection outcomes. Results: A total of 740,144 patients were included: 99,425 (13.4%) BAA and 640,749 (86.6%) WNH, distributed as follows; 32,2976 GS, 17,6175 OS, 44,383 VS, 2,227 CS, 9,645 TS, 42,298 NS, 42,726 US, 18,518 ENT, 20,709 PS, and 60,517 GYN cases. Surgical site infection rates were higher among WNH in GS (4.4% vs. 4.1%; p = 0.003) and TS (3.1% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.015); lower in VS (3.2% vs. 4.4%; p < 0.001), OS (1.2% vs.1.6%; p < 0.001), and GYN (2.4% vs. 3%; p < 0.001); and similar between WNH and BAA in ENT (1.8% vs 1.8%; p = 0.76), and US (1.9% vs. 1.9%; p = 0.90). Non-surgical infection was higher in BAA in NS (3.2% vs. 2.5%; p = 0.003), and higher in WNH in GYN (2.6% vs. 2%; p < 0.001), OS (1.7% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.001), US (4.4% vs. 3.6%; p = 0.014), and VS (3.4% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Variation exists in SSI rates between WNH and BAA patients among surgical subspecialties. Further research is required to understand these differences and address racial disparities in outcomes.

Parathyroidectomy outcomes for Asians in the United States: Implications for resident surgical education

IntroductionOutcomes for Asian patients in the United States are often overlooked in the surgical literature. Surgical education includes little emphasis on reporting outcomes for Asian patients in the United States. Our null hypothesis (H0) is that there is no difference in surgical complications following parathyroid surgery between Asians and all other ethnicities in the United States. Our alternate hypothesis (H1) is that Asians have more incidences of certain complications (possibly due to culture and language barriers). MethodsData from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried for parathyroidectomy and patient race. Complications within 30 days of surgery were extracted. ResultsAmong, White, Black, Asian, Pacific Islanders, Native Americans, and Hispanic patients of the United States the Asians (p = 0.018) and Blacks (p = 0.003) had increased operative time for parathyroid surgery compared to other groups. Hispanics had the most surgical complications (p = 0.025). Blacks had statistically significant longer hospital stay (p < 0.0001). Discussion/conclusionUnited States Asian patient data is not typically analyzed separately for complications. We found that in the United States Asians have increased operative time for parathyroidectomy. Future studies of healthcare inequities should include analysis of data for Asian surgical data in the United States as this may help prevent future surgical complications.

Postoperative Discharge Destination Impacts 30-Day Outcomes: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Multi-Specialty Surgical Cohort Analysis.

Surgical patients can be discharged to a variety of facilities which vary widely in intensity of care. Postoperative readmissions have been found to be more strongly associated with post-discharge events than pre-discharge complications, indicating the importance of discharge destination. We sought to evaluate the association between discharge destination and 30-day outcomes. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Patients were dichotomized based on discharge destination: home versus non-home. The main outcome of interest was 30-day unplanned readmission. The secondary outcomes included post-discharge pulmonary, infectious, thromboembolic, and bleeding complications, as well as death. In this cohort study of over 1.5 million patients undergoing common surgical procedures across eight surgical specialties, we found non-home discharge to be associated with adverse 30-day post-operative outcomes, namely, unplanned readmissions, post-discharge pulmonary, infectious, thromboembolic, and bleeding complications, as well as death. Non-home discharge is associated with worse 30-day outcomes among patients undergoing common surgical procedures. Patients and caregivers should be counseled regarding discharge destination, as non-home discharge is associated with adverse post-operative outcomes.

Foot and Ankle Surgery Postoperative Complications with Regional vs General Anesthesia

Category: Trauma; Other Introduction/Purpose: Regional anesthesia has been increasingly used within orthopaedic surgery. It has been found to decrease opioid use and consumption and has been associated with decreased blood loss and clot formation in some lower extremity surgeries – specifically hip and knee arthroplasty surgery. General anesthesia is not without risks including malignant hyperthermia, laryngeal edema, vocal cord trauma, and delirium. This has led to increased utilization of regional anesthesia in foot and ankle surgery. However, there is a paucity of research that compares the postoperative outcomes in patients treated with regional compared to general anesthesia in these surgeries. We hypothesize the use of regional anesthesia in foot and ankle surgery leads to fewer short-term postoperative complications compared to general anesthesia. Methods: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried from 2006-2018 to identify patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for all foot and ankle surgery were utilized to determine which participants to include in the analysis. The cohort was divided into patients who received regional anesthesia versus those who received general anesthesia, and comparisons were made on demographic characteristics, and comorbidities, using chi-squared and t-test analyses. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify whether lack of regional anesthesia was an independent risk factor for infection, minor postoperative complications, and major postoperative complications. Major postoperative complications included any complication that had a long-term effect on someone’s life or led to reoperation, while minor postoperative complications included any event that needed medical intervention but did not impact a person’s health long-term. Results: Using the ACS-NSQIP database and CPT codes, there were 12,764 participants for regional anesthesia and 73,481 participants who had general anesthesia. Utilizing logistic regression, this study found that the absence of regional anesthesia was independently associated with an increased risk for minor complications in foot and ankle surgery (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.34, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.25-1.44], p=0.00). The absence of regional anesthesia was not associated with increased risk of major complications in foot and ankle surgery (OR 1.04, CI [0.96-1.12], p=0.32). Patients who received regional anesthesia were older and had more comorbidities than those without regional anesthesia used which may be a reason for the findings for major complications. Conclusion: Regional anesthesia independently reduced the risk of minor postoperative complications up to 30-days following foot and ankle surgery in this study. Patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery may benefit from augmenting their anesthetic plan with regional anesthesia.

Body Mass Index is a Predictor of Discharge to a Post-Acute Care Facility Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: The utilization of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) continues to increase, and identifying preoperative factors that influence postoperative outcomes after TAA may be valuable. The use of post-acute care (PAC) facilities has also grown substantially, and discharge to a PAC facility can increase patient morbidity and postoperative costs. The purpose of this study is to define the effect of BMI on discharge to a PAC facility and hospital length of stay (LOS) following TAA. Methods: We performed a retrospective review to identify a large cohort of adult patients who underwent TAA between 2006 - 2020 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Using overweight patients as the reference BMI group, we estimated a sex- and age- adjusted log-binomial regression model on BMI categories to estimate risk ratios to analyze the association between BMI and risk of being discharged to a PAC facility and/or hospital LOS. Results: Relative to overweight patients, obese patients had 1.47 times the risk (P=0.008), and morbidly obese patients had 2.26 times risk (P &lt; 0.001) of being discharged to a PAC facility after TAA. Males had 0.47 times the risk of females (P &lt; 0.001), and for each year older, patients had 1.07 times the risk (P &lt; 0.001) of being discharged to a PAC facility. There was no difference in hospital LOS for underweight patients, but healthy weight patients stayed an additional 0.29 days (P=0.004), obese patients stayed an additional 0.18 days (P=0.010), and morbidly obese patients stayed an additional 0.34 days (P=0.006). Males stayed 0.30 fewer hospital days than females (P &lt; 0.001), and for each year older, patients stayed 0.011 days longer (P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion: This study found that women and patients who are obese and morbidly obese have a greater LOS and chance to be discharged to a PAC facility. Increasing age is also associated with an increase in LOS and discharge to a PAC. These may be important factors when discussing the postoperative plan with patients prior to TAA.

A Self-Sustaining Antibiotic Prophylaxis Program to Reduce Surgical Site Infections.

Background: Our multi-institutional healthcare system had a higher-than-expected surgical site infection (SSI) rate. We aimed to improve our peri-operative antibiotic administration process. Gap analysis identified three opportunities for process improvement: standardized antibiotic selection, standardized second-line antibiotic agents for patients with allergies, and feedback regarding antibiotic administration compliance. Hypothesis: Implementation of a multifaceted quality improvement initiative including a near-real-time pre-operative antibiotic compliance feedback tool will improve compliance with antibiotic administration protocols, subsequently lowering SSI rate. Methods: A compliance feedback tool designed to provide monthly reports to all anesthesia and surgical personnel was implemented at two facilities, in September 2017 and December 2018. Internal case data were tracked for antibiotic compliance through June 2021, and these data were merged with American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) data at the case level to provide process and outcome measures for SSIs. Implementation success was evaluated by comparing protocol compliance and risk-adjusted rates of superficial and deep SSI before and after the quality improvement implementation. Results: A total of 20,385 patients were included in this study; 11,548 patients in the pre-implementation and 8,837 in the post-implementation groups. Baseline patient and operative characteristics were similar between groups, except the post-implementation group had a higher median expected SSI rate (2.2% vs. 1.6%). Post-implementation, antibiotic protocol compliance increased from 86.3% to 97.6%, and superficial and deep SSIs decreased from 2.8% to 1.9% (p < 0.001). The odds of superficial and deep SSI in patients in the post-implementation group was 0.69 (0.57, 0.83) times the odds of superficial and deep SSI in pre-implementation patients while adjusting for age, gender, diabetes mellitus, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) classification, wound class, smoking, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Observed-to-expected ratios of superficial and deep SSI decreased from 0.82 to 0.48 after the intervention. Conclusions: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis standardization and providing near-real-time individualized feedback resulted in sustained improvement in peri-operative antibiotic compliance rates and reduced superficial and deep SSIs.

Effect of BMI on Acute Postoperative Complications following Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA)

Category: Ankle Introduction/Purpose: Total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is an effective treatment for various ankle pathologies, but some concern remains for the relatively high associated complication and failure rates relative to major joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Patient body mass index (BMI) is a modifiable and potentially important preoperative variable when evaluating postoperative complications. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of BMI on the acute postoperative complication rate after TAA. Methods: We performed a retrospective review to identify a large cohort of adult patients who underwent TAA between 2006 - 2020 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Using overweight patients as the reference BMI group, we estimated log-binomial models to estimate risk ratios on outcomes, while also adjusting for sex and age, in order to investigate whether there was a significant difference in complication rate between the BMI groups. Results: We found that, relative to overweight patients, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of acute complications for underweight (p-value=0.062), healthy weight (p-value=0.800), obese (p-value=0.993), or morbidly obese (p- value=0.781) patients who underwent TAA. There was also no statistically significant difference in the risk of acute complications based on age (p-value=0.876) or sex (p-value=0.696) for TAA. Additionally, there was no significant difference between the BMI groups when comparing how many patients had a complication out of the total number of patients in their respective BMI group for either major complications (p-value=0.9835) or minor complications (p-value=0.0578). Conclusion: We found that BMI, age, and sex did not lead to a statistically significant difference in the risk of complications, even when stratified by major vs minor complications, within 30 days postoperatively for TAA.

Preoperative Prediction of Postoperative Infections Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record Data.

To estimate preoperative risk of postoperative infections using structured electronic health record (EHR) data. Surveillance and reporting of postoperative infections is primarily done through costly, labor-intensive manual chart reviews on a small sample of patients. Automated methods using statistical models applied to postoperative EHR data have shown promise to augment manual review as they can cover all operations in a timely manner. However, there are no specific models for risk-adjusting infectious complication rates using EHR data. Preoperative EHR data from 30,639 patients (2013-2019) were linked to the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program preoperative data and postoperative infection outcomes data from 5 hospitals in the University of Colorado Health System. EHR data included diagnoses, procedures, operative variables, patient characteristics, and medications. Lasso and the knockoff filter were used to perform controlled variable selection. Outcomes included surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, sepsis/septic shock, and pneumonia up to 30 days postoperatively. Among >15,000 candidate predictors, 7 were chosen for the surgical site infection model and 6 for each of the urinary tract infection, sepsis, and pneumonia models. Important variables included preoperative presence of the specific outcome, wound classification, comorbidities, and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for each model ranged from 0.73 to 0.89. Parsimonious preoperative models for predicting postoperative infection risk using EHR data were developed and showed comparable performance to existing American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program risk models that use manual chart review. These models can be used to estimate risk-adjusted postoperative infection rates applied to large volumes of EHR data in a timely manner.

The Anterior Versus Posterior Approach for Interbody Fusion in Patients Who Are Classified as Obese: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 9,021 Patients From a National Database.

Introduction Lumbar spine interbody fusions have been performed to relieve back pain and improve stability due to various underlying pathologies.Anterior interbody fusion and posterior interbody fusion approaches are two main approaches that are classically compared.In an attempt to compare these two approaches to the spine, large retrospective national database reviews have been performed to compare and predict 30-day postoperative outcomes; however, they have conflicting findings.Obesity, defined as having a body mass index (BMI) over 30kg/m2, may also contribute to the extent of spine pathology and isassociated withincreased rates of postoperative complications. Complication rates in patients who are obese have yet to be thoroughly investigated using a large national database.Our present investigation aims to make this comparison using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database.The goal of the present study is to utilize a nationwide prospective database to determine short-term differences in postoperative outcomes between posterior and anterior lumbar fusion in patients with obesity and relate these findings to previous studies in the general population. Methods A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 9,021 patientdata from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2015 to 2019 who underwent an elective, single-level fusion via anterior or posterior surgical approach. This database captures over 150 clinical variables on individual patient cases, including demographic data, preoperative risk factors and laboratory values, intraoperative data, and significant events up to postoperative day 30. All outcome measures were included in this analysis with special attentionto rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), prolonged length of stay (LOS), reoperation, and operation time. Results Multivariable analysis controlling for age, BMI, sex, race, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and selected comorbidities with P < 0.05 demonstrated that the anterior approach was an independent predictor for all significant outcomes except prolonged length of stay. Compared to the posterior approach, the anterior approach had a shorter total operation time (B = -13.257, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-17.522, -8.992], P< 0.001), higher odds of deep vein thrombosis (odds ratio (OR) = 2.210, 95% CI [1.211, 4.033], P= 0.010), and higher odds of pulmonary embolism (OR = 2.679, 95% CI [1.311, 5.477], P= 0.007) and was protective against unplanned reoperation (OR = 0.702, 95% CI [0.548, 0.898],P= 0.005). Conclusions The obese population makes up a large and growing demographic of those undergoing spine surgery, and as such, it is pertinent to investigate the differences, advantages, and disadvantages of lumbar fusion approaches in this group. While anterior approachesmaybe protective of longer operation time and unplanned reoperation, this benefit may not be clinically significant when considering an increased risk of DVT and PE. Given the short-term nature of this dataset and the limitations inherent in large de-identified retrospective database studies, these findings are interpreted with caution. Longer-term follow-up studies accounting for confounding variables with spine-centered outcomes will be necessary to further elucidate these nuances.