Abstract Introduction: Patient Navigators (PNs) have have proven to be effective along the cancer care continuum. However, emerging data suggest that the scope of patient navigation should be expanded to include other contexts such as the recruitment of racial/ethnic minorities for cancer clinical trials. Because the processes of recruitment and retention are often linked, the same barriers hindering minority recruitment often hinder minority retention. The potential benefits of studying generalizability and statistical power for subgroup analyses may be lost with disproportionately high attrition among the enrolled minorities. The dual focus of the training curriculum on both recruitment and retention distinguishes it from the few previous efforts focused on the traditional PN model for minority recruitment in clinical trials and genomic research studies. Methods: A two-phased navigator training program was implemented. Components of the training program was adapted in collaboration, with the Joint Cancer Advisory Council and Bioethics Co-Leaders, from the existing UAB IMPACT Patient Navigation Training Curriculum. A systematic literature review will be conducted to identify the most salient genomic educational and resource needs and concerns of AAs and Hispanic populations regarding participation in genomic-focused research and clinical trials. These findings informed the adaptation of the training curriculum based on principles of adult education. Results: We conducted a joint training for the Clinical Trials and Genomic Navigators at each Partnership institution (MSM, TU, UAB) for the proposed project. The Co-Leaders from the Partnership Outreach Cores, the Bioethics Shared Resource, and the Joint Cancer Advisory Council planned and assigned responsibilities and dates for completion of the training activities. The initial training was the GW Navigator On-line Training Program. A supplemental training was held at one of the partnering sites, a safety-net hospital (Grady Cancer Center for Excellence). The in-person training featured an overview presentation on Genetic Risk Assessment in Oncology by a licensed genetic counselor, followed by a case study approach to enrollment and the implementation of a research study with training materials such as tablets provided by the training conductors. An evaluation was completed by the team for training conductors. The third training was held at Tuskegee University and ttopics included the importance of consent training. For this presentation, we will present the qualitative and quantitative findings. Conclusions: The training outcomes were standardized and included input from the Bioethics Co-Leaders and JCAR members. We measured changes over time (pre vs. posttest) in: 1) knowledge and skills of clinical trials and genomic research; 2) ability to identify barriers and solutions to participation in research, 3) ability to implement the two toolkits, and 4) level of ease in identifying open protocol research studies and clinical trials. Citation Format: Osato Eke, Makeeta Rayton, Teresa Hall, Lleana Barrios-Zermeno, Jennier Culbertson, Angela Morris, Vivian Carter, Yu-Mei Schoenberger, Victoria Churchill, Desiree Rivers, Stephen Sodeke, Mohamed Mubasher, Roland Matthews, Brian Rivers. Evaluation of a navigator training program to increase clinical trials and genomic research participation among adult African Americans and Hispanics residing in the Southern United States [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr B119.