Ambulatory Services Research Articles

Design and validation of indicators for the comprehensive measurement of quality of care for type 2 diabetes and acute respiratory infections in ambulatory health services

Abstract Developing ambulatory health services (AHS) of optimal quality is a pending issue for many health systems at a global level, especially in middle- and low-income countries. An effective health response requires indicators to measure the quality of care that are context-specific and feasible for routine monitoring. This paper aimed to design and validate indicators for assessing the technical and interpersonal quality dimensions for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and acute respiratory infections (ARI) care in AHS. The study was conducted in two stages. First, technical and user-centered-based indicators of quality of care for T2D and ARI care were designed following international recommendations, mainly from the American Diabetes Association standards and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines. We then assessed the validity, reliability, relevance, and feasibility of the proposed indicators implementing the modified Delphi technique. A panel of 17 medical experts from five countries scored the indicators using two electronic questionnaires, one for each reason for consultation selected, sent by email in two sequential rounds of rating. We defined the levels of consensus according to the overall median for each performance category, which was established as the threshold. Selected indicators included those with scores equal to or higher than the threshold. We designed 36 T2D indicators, of which 16 were validated for measuring the detection of risks and complications, glycemic control, pharmacological treatment, and patient-centered care. Out of the 22 indicators designed for ARI, we validated 10 for diagnosis, appropriate prescription of antimicrobials, and patient-centered care. The validated indicators showed consistency for the dimensions analyzed. Hence, they proved to be a potentially reliable and valuable tool for monitoring the performance of the various T2D and ARI care processes in AHS. Further research will be needed to verify the applicability of the validated indicators in routine clinical practice.

Piloting patient-reported outcome measures for evaluation of the Irish Chronic Disease Programme

Abstract Background The Irish National Integrated Care Programme for Chronic Disease (ICPCD) aims to deliver end-to-end, patient-centred care across three clinical programmes; Heart, Respiratory and Diabetes. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a means of objectively measuring changes in patients’ subjectively-perceived health status over time in response to services. As such, PROMs facilitate service monitoring and evaluation and are an important tool for the ICPCD to ensure optimal, patient-centred, value-based healthcare delivery. Methods To select the most appropriate PROMs instrument for use across ICPCD, comprehensive literature review was undertaken followed by key stakeholder consultation in winter 2022. Following consideration against a set of pre-determined criteria the EQ-5D-5L, a well-validated, reliable PROMs instrument, was selected as the most appropriate PROMs instrument for use. Study design involved pilot implementation of EQ-5D-5L in one ICPCD ambulatory care hub service followed by mixed methods evaluation of staff experience of the pilot. Results The pilot was conducted from April to June 2023 among a socio-demographically diverse sample of patients attending their first and last episode of care with the ICPCD diabetic patient education service in Galway. Following service attendance there was a significant aggregate improvement in self-reported overall health rating but no significant change in self-reported mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort or anxiety/depression. Predominant staff concerns included staff and patient burden and the need for adequate staff resourcing and information technology support. Conclusions In conjunction with key national stakeholders findings from the pilot will be used to support the development of a PROMs implementation plan at scale for adoption across all ICPCD services. Ultimately national implementation will support the ongoing delivery of high quality patient-centred care within ICPCD services. Key messages • PROMs facilitate service evaluation and are an important tool for the Irish National Integrated Care Programme for Chronic Disease (ICPCD) to ensure optimal patient-centred healthcare delivery. • This pilot will support PROMs implementation at scale across ICPCD services and ultimately reinforce the ongoing delivery of high-quality, value-based, integrated healthcare.

Effects of restrictive asylum-seeker healthcare policies: systematic review of evidence from Germany

Abstract Background Asylum-seekers’ entitlements to healthcare vary within and across European countries, over time, and between different nationalities. Within Germany, healthcare policies for asylum-seekers range from restrictions of both scope and access to healthcare to full health entitlements, depending on a person's legal status, duration of stay, country of origin, and place of residence. We seized these variations to study the effects of restrictive vs. inclusive healthcare policies on health status, health system outcomes (incl. health equity), healthcare provision, healthcare utilization, and efficiency. Methods We conducted a systematic review in five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, LIVIVO, Google Scholar) to identify and analyse empirical studies on the effects of healthcare policies for asylum-seekers in Germany. Out of 1159 initial hits, 66 records were assessed for quality and included in the narrative synthesis. Results The synthesised evidence shows that more inclusive policies facilitate needs-based health care utilization, incl. broader utilization of ambulatory services and lower use of emergency services. They reduce complexity, fragmentation and bureaucracy for healthcare users and providers by simplifying authorisation and reimbursement. Evidence suggests that inclusive policies contribute to better subjective and mental health among asylum-seekers. We found no evidence for access restrictions being associated with cost savings or other health system benefits. Conclusions Restrictive healthcare policies are often justified with the need to protect fiscal resources and health systems. Yet, evidence from Germany shows that more inclusive healthcare policies for asylum-seekers hold benefits in terms of health system outcomes, while not entailing higher costs. Inclusive policies are thus not only normatively preferable to restrictive policy options; they also yield better performance from a health systems perspective. Key messages • Germany is a pertinent test-case for analyzing the effects of restrictive vs. inclusive healthcare policies for asylum-seekers. • Inclusive healthcare policies hold benefits in terms of health outcomes and health system performance, while restrictions fail to show advantages in fiscal or other domains of performance.

Behavioural economic interventions to reduce health care appointment non-attendance: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundAppointment non-attendance – often referred to as “missed appointments”, “patient no-show”, or “did not attend (DNA)” – causes volatility in health systems around the world. Of the different approaches that can be adopted to reduce patient non-attendance, behavioural economics-oriented mechanisms (i.e., psychological, cognitive, emotional, and social factors that may impact individual decisions) are reasoned to be better suited in such contexts – where the need is to persuade, nudge, and/ or incentivize patients to honour their scheduled appointment. The aim of this systematic literature review is to identify and summarize the published evidence on the use and effectiveness of behavioural economic interventions to reduce no-shows for health care appointments.MethodsWe systematically searched four databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) for published and grey literature on behavioural economic strategies to reduce no-shows for health care appointments. Eligible studies met four criteria for inclusion; they were (1) available in English, Spanish, or French, (2) assessed behavioural economics interventions, (3) objectively measured a behavioural outcome (as opposed to attitudes or preferences), and (4) used a randomized and controlled or quasi-experimental study design.ResultsOur initial search of the five databases identified 1,225 articles. After screening studies for inclusion criteria and assessing risk of bias, 61 studies were included in our final analysis. Data was extracted using a predefined 19-item extraction matrix. All studies assessed ambulatory or outpatient care services, although a variety of hospital departments or appointment types. The most common behaviour change intervention assessed was the use of reminders (n = 56). Results were mixed regarding the most effective methods of delivering reminders. There is significant evidence supporting the effectiveness of reminders (either by SMS, telephone, or mail) across various settings. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding alternative interventions and efforts to address other heuristics, leaving a majority of behavioural economic approaches unused and unassessed.ConclusionThe studies in our review reflect a lack of diversity in intervention approaches but point to the effectiveness of reminder systems in reducing no-show rates across a variety of medical departments. We recommend future studies to test alternative behavioural economic interventions that have not been used, tested, and/or published before.

Health System Responsiveness in the Primary Health in a Developing Country: Expectations and Experiences of Clients

Background: Healthcare responsiveness is an essential goal of health systems. Responsiveness focuses on the nonclinical aspects of healthcare and measures individuals; experiences. There is little knowledge about responsiveness in primary care; most responsiveness studies have focused on inpatient services. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the responsiveness of primary care in the Urmia District Health Network in northwestern Iran. Methods: Data collection was conducted at urban health centers. The data presented are from a single observational research project. Results: Two hundred forty regular clients were interviewed in selected urban health centers in the Urmia district health network. The mean total response score was satisfactory. Full access and easy receipt of services without discrimination were important and noteworthy results for responsiveness. Regarding respondents, expectations, dignity, and prompt attention were the most important domains, while provider choice and social support were the least important. The results showed no statistically significant differences between the mean responsiveness scores for ambulatory care and hospital services. Conclusion: Improvements in responsiveness domains increase convergence and alignment between clients' expectations and health system performance. In this context, dignity and prompt attention are essential.

An evaluation of three validated comorbidity indices to predict short-term postoperative outcomes after prosthetic urologic surgery.

Commonly used comorbidity indices include the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Elixhauser/Van Walraven Index (VWI), and modified frailty index (mFI). This study evaluates whether these indices predict postoperative readmissions and complications after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) and artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement. We identified adult males who underwent IPP or AUS placement using the State Inpatient and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases for Florida (2010-2015) and California (2010-2011). CCI, VWI, and mFI scores were calculated for each patient. We extracted 30-day emergency department services, 30-day readmissions, 90-day device complications (e.g., removal, replacement, or infection), and 90-day postoperative complications (excluding device complications). Receiver-operating characteristic curves were constructed and areas under the curve (AUC) were compared between the indices using the VWI as the reference model. We considered an AUC < 0.7 to represent poor predictive power. We identified 4242 IPP and 1190 AUS patients. All three indices had AUCs and 95% confidence intervals less than 0.70 for all outcomes following IPP and AUS placement making these indices poor predictors for postoperative outcomes. There were no significant differences in predicting 90-day postoperative complications between the VWI (AUC = 0.59, 95% CI [0.54-0.63]), CCI (AUC = 0.59, 95% CI [0.54-0.63], p = 0.99), and mFI (AUC = 0.60, 95% CI [0.55-0.66], p = 0.53) for IPPs and VWI (AUC = 0.54, 95% CI [0.47-0.61]), CCI (AUC = 0.50, 95% CI [0.43-0.57], p = 0.30), and mFI (AUC = 0.52, 95% CI [0.43-0.60], p = 0.56) for AUS placements. All three comorbidity indices were poor predictors of readmissions and complications following urologic prosthetic surgeries. A better comorbidity index is needed for risk-stratification of patients undergoing these surgeries.

What is the existing evidence base for adult medical same day emergency care in UK NHS hospitals? A scoping review protocol

ObjectivesSame day emergency care (SDEC) is a new model of care, which has emerged over the past 5 years, building on prior ambulatory care services. The National Health Service (NHS)...

ThTP8.7 Streamlining ambulatory management of emergency general surgery

Abstract Aims There is a trend to increase ambulatory management of general surgical patients, both improve the experience and outcomes for patients, as well as reduce need for inpatient beds. Prior to 2019, our trust had no ambulatory service; during 2019 a clinic was opened, which was located remotely from the admissions ward, and as a result we were unable to direct the majority of patients to the clinic to support ambulatory management. We sought to assess the benefit of the clinic, and to co-locate the ward and ambulatory triage clinic to increase access of ambulatory management. Methods Admission rates were assessed before and after the ability to run virtually all patients through the ambulatory ‘triage’ clinic before making a decision to discharge or admit. Data have been used from electronical hospital systems. Results In 2019 the average number of patients reviewed was 18, with a 81% admission rate. Practice was variable during the COVID pandemic, once things stabilised in 2022, 25 patients were reviewed between clinic and the ward daily, with 16.2(65%) admission rate. The move of the ward and the clinic in 2022 did not change the total number of clinical contacts a day (25), however there is a reduction in the average percentage of patients staying overnight to 13.5(54%). Conclusions We have demonstrated that we can reduce the number of inpatient stays and reduce the length of stay of patients. The same day discharge rate was improved by allowing the majority of patients to be reviewed in the clinic, before a decision regarding admission was made.

Inpatient vs outpatient arthroplasty: A in-state database analysis of 90-day complications

IntroductionAn increase in the number of policy initiatives, such as alternative payment models, have prompted healthcare providers to examine health-care expenditures while seeking to improve quality of care. Performing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the outpatient setting is an attractive option in driving costs down and providing psychological benefits to patients. Concerns regarding the safety and effectiveness of same-day discharge protocols warrants further investigation, especially on the state level. Due to the lack of consensus, we aimed to compare: (1) risk factors for outpatient arthroplasty and (2) incidences of postoperative complications between inpatient vs outpatient arthroplasty using an in-state database. MethodsPatients who underwent total knee or hip arthroplasty between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 were identified. Data was drawn from the Maryland State Inpatient Database (SID) and Maryland State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD). A total of 7817 patients had TJA within this time. Patients were divided into inpatient arthroplasty (n = 1429) and outpatient arthroplasty (n = 6338). Demographic variables, medical comorbidities, and 90-day complication rates were compared between inpatient and outpatient procedures. Additional independent variables included: marital status, primary language, race, and median household income. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for complications following TJA after controlling for risk factors and patient comorbidities. ResultsArthroplasty in the outpatient setting were more likely to be married (61.3% vs. 51.2%, p < 0.001), white (75.5% vs. 60.9%, <0.001), speak English as primary language (98.7% vs. 88.6%, p < 0.001), and have lower rates of diabetes (4.8% vs. 9.7%, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (16.3% vs. 21.8%, p < 0.001), and obesity (30.0% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) compared to arthroplasty in the inpatient setting, respectively. There were lower incidences of acute kidney injury (0.2 vs. 0.8%, p < 0.001) and infection (0.3% vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001) in the outpatient cohort compared to the inpatient cohort, respectively. Inpatient arthroplasty (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.98, 95% CI 1.30–3.02, p = 0.002) and hypertension (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.23–3.64, p = 0.007) were independent risk factors for total complications following TJA. ConclusionArthroplasty in the outpatient setting showed fewer complications than compared to patients in the inpatient setting. Although multiple factors should guide the decision for arthroplasty, outpatient arthroplasty may be a safe option for select, healthier patients without the increased burden of increased complications.

Pharmacist ambulatory pain services for a chronic non‐cancer pain clinic: a descriptive study

AbstractBackgroundPatients presenting to specialist pain clinics are often prescribed complex and high‐risk analgesic regimens. In this setting, pharmacists can help identify at risk patients and provide valuable clinical input to improve patient outcomes.AimTo evaluate the role of a clinical pharmacist in improving the triage, assessment and management of patients presenting to ambulatory pain clinics.MethodThis descriptive study enrolled patients from two chronic noncancer pain clinics from July to December 2021. A new clinical pharmacist service was devised, which operated as telehealth one day per week. The pharmacist was responsible for accepting referrals, triaging based on clinic criteria and updating them with prescription risk factors, in line with SafeScript's traffic light system. Pharmacist clinical services included completion of medication histories, drug dose interventions and patient education. This project received departmental ethical approval from the Eastern Health Office of Research and Ethics prior to commencement (Approval No: QA21‐068).ResultsThe pharmacist assessed 253 patients and identified prescription risk factors for 68 patients; of which 11 (16%) had received opioids from ≥4 prescribers, 10 (15%) were issued a monitored prescription from ≥4 pharmacies, seven (10%) were on high‐risk drug combinations, 25 (37%) had an Oral Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (OMEDD) of 50–100 mg, and 26 (38%) with OMEDD &gt;100 mg. The pharmacist completed 67 medication histories and provided 22 accepted drug intervention recommendations to clinic physicians, including seven recommendations for dose adjustments, six to cease a medicine and nine to start a new medicine.ConclusionThe pharmacist incorporated SafeScript in the clinics' triage processes and provided valuable clinical interventions complementing the care provided by the pain physicians and the allied health staff.

Quality assuring an outsourced ambulatory electrocardiogram pathway

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction The rising demand for arrhythmia care has led to the use of outsourced ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) pathways to maintain timely service delivery and meet diagnostic targets. Since COVID-19, our ambulatory ECG service operates primarily through external third-party providers, using the remote (postal) model, where monitors are dispatched to patients for self-application. This pathway was activated to comply with social distancing restrictions and has now been integrated into our diagnostic model of care. A quality assurance (QA) process was introduced to ensure compliance with our internal ECG reporting practice and escalation protocols. Purpose To quality assure our outsourced ambulatory ECG reports and pathways against internal practices and protocols. Methods We audited our QA records on outsourced services from 1st January 2022 - 31st December 2022. During this period, a total of 4317 patients were provided with an ambulatory ECG monitor via the remote service. We conducted regular (~every 2-3 months) retrospective random sampling of ambulatory ECG reports (~10%) for inclusion in QA. Our QA framework consists of a series of quality and consistency checks related to clinical information, report content, and adherence to escalation protocols (table 1). QA reports are fed back to our providers at quarterly meetings to ensure improved service quality. To obtain the requisite data, a variety of sources were cross-referenced. These included our QA reports, outsourced databases, third-party provider platforms, and our patient information system. Results Over a 12-month period, a total of 459 reports were quality assured. Ambulatory ECG reports were checked for clinical information, report content, supporting ECG evidence and amendment requests (table 1). A compliance rate of 99% was achieved. There were few cases (1%) where a request was made to the provider to amend the report or include additional information, namely ECG strips to clarify the findings. We also quality checked compliance to our escalation protocols: appropriate RAG (red, amber, green) rating and action, timely notification to clinicians, and adequate documentation. The reviewed ambulatory ECG reports were RAG rated as: Red 23 (5%), Amber 189 (40%), Green-Amber 142 (30%), Green 117 (25%). These were carried out with 99% accuracy. Activation of the appropriate escalation protocols and timely clinician notification achieved 100% compliance, including 23 red-flagged reports requiring immediate action. Conclusion The outsourced ambulatory ECG pathway had a very high rate of compliance with internal ECG reporting practice and escalation protocols. Our QA framework ensures we work in collaboration with our external partners to continually provide high-quality ECG diagnostics. We believe undertaking internal quality checks is a vital part of using outsourced service providers.

Ambulatory Orbital Fracture Repair: An Analysis of ER Visits After Surgery From a Multistate Study.

To determine the 30-day postoperative emergency room (ER) visit rate following ambulatory orbital fracture repair with same-day discharge, and the causes and risk factors associated with ER visit. Database study. State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD) and State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) for California, New York, and Florida for 2011. We identified orbital fracture repair procedures among adults from the SASD, which was linked to the SEDD to identify the incidence and causes of ER visits within 30 days. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the factors associated with ER visit. Among 762 patients, the 30-day postoperative ER visit rate was 4.5%. Most ER visits (58.9%) occurred during the first week after surgery. The most common reasons for ER visits were related to pain, swelling, headache, dizziness, and fatigue (29.4%), followed by ophthalmologic etiologies including visual disturbances and infection of the eye (14.7%). There was no case of retrobulbar hematoma. In the multivariate analysis, patients living in Florida were at a significantly higher risk for ER visit compared to those in California (odds ratio: 4.48 [1.43-14.10], p = .010). Ambulatory orbital fracture repair appears to be safe. Common reasons for ER visit included pain, swelling, and ophthalmic symptoms. An increased risk for ER visit was seen with certain geographic regions but not with medical comorbidities or concurrent facial fractures or procedures.

Using the National Mental Health Service Planning Framework to inform integrated regional planning: a case study in Tasmania, Australia

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to demonstrate the application of a needs-based mental health service planning model in Tasmania, Australia to identify indicative directions for future service development that ensure the equitable provision of mental health services across the State.MethodsThe activity and capacity of Tasmania’s 2018–19 mental health services were compared to estimates of required care by: (1) generating estimates of required care using the National Mental Health Service Planning Framework (NMHSPF); (2) collating administrative mental health services data; (3) aligning administrative data to the NMHSPF; and (4) comparing aligned administrative data and NMHSPF estimates to identify priority areas for service development. Findings were contextualised using information about service location, population demographics, and upcoming service development.ResultsBed-based services capacity reached 85% of the NMHSPF estimate. However, access to certain bed types was inequitable across regional areas. Access to jurisdictional clinical ambulatory team-based services was lowest in the South, while overall full-time equivalent staff capacity reached 58% of the NMHSPF estimate. Access to Primary Health Tasmania (PHT) primary care services was highest in the North West; access to Medicare services was highest in the South. Collectively, activity across primary care (PHT, headspace and Medicare) reached 43% of the NMHSPF estimate. Over half of Community Managed Mental Health Support Services were state-wide services.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the application of a needs-based planning model for mental health services. Findings revealed service priority areas across Tasmania and highlight considerations for needs-based planning.

Retrospective evaluation of the causes and distribution of lameness in beef and dairy cattle evaluated by ambulatory and in-house clinical services at a North American veterinary teaching hospital.

To describe the causes and distribution of lameness in beef and dairy cattle presenting to either a primary care ambulatory or in-house clinical service at a veterinary teaching hospital. This retrospective clinical case study was conducted by reviewing hospital admissions of beef and dairy cattle seen by in-house or ambulatory clinicians at a veterinary teaching hospital from 2001 to 2021. Final diagnosis was recorded and, when available, the affected limb, whether a lesion was localized to the digit, and the affected claw were also recorded. Data were stratified by location of initial evaluation (ambulatory vs in hospital), period of presentation, production class, age, sex, and whether the final diagnosis was infectious or noninfectious. Overall, 2,220 animals met criteria for inclusion in the study. The most common diagnoses were noninfectious in nature and affected a hind limb more often than a forelimb. More than 82% of all cattle had lameness localized to the digit, with the lateral claw being affected more than 80% of the time. Lameness is an important concern from both a humane and economic standpoint. The results of this study will help with the diagnosis and prevention of lameness in beef and dairy cattle of different ages and production classes.

Poster 362: Identifying Racial Disparity in Utilization and Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy using Machine Learning

Objectives: Background: Arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment of femoroacetabular pathology has been increasingly used in the past thirty years with interventions resulting in improved hip function and ultimate delay of hip arthroplasty in a minimally invasive manner. Unfortunately, previous investigations have observed decreased rates of access, utilization of, and outcomes following orthopedic interventions such as hip arthroplasty in underrepresented patients. The purpose of this study is to examine racial differences in procedural rates, outcomes, and complications in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Methods: The State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD) and State Emergency Department Database (SEDD) of New York were queried for patients undergoing hip arthroscopy from 2011 to 2017. The primary outcomes investigated were utilization over time, total charges billed per encounter, 90-day emergency department visits, and revision hip arthroscopy. Patients were stratified into White and non-White race, and intergroup differences were evaluated with descriptive statistics. Subgroup analysis was performed with linear mixed-effects models to identify significant interactions between race and individual variables that contributed to any differences in the outcomes of interest. Temporal trends in utilization of hip arthroscopy and concomitant procedures between the two groups were analyzed with Poisson regression modeling. Finally, targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) was performed to provide nonparametric estimates of the specific differences in the outcomes studied using machine learning ensembles while controlling for patient risk factors. Results: A total of 9,745 patients underwent hip arthroscopy during the study period, with 1,081 patients of non-White race (11.9%). Results of Poisson regression demonstrated an annual increase of 1.11 in the incidence rate of hip arthroscopy among White patients, compared to 1.03 for non-White patients (p&lt;0.001), with this disparity projected to increase by 2040. Based on TMLE utilizing an ensemble of machine learning models, non-White patients were significantly more likely to incur higher costs (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.24-1.37, p&lt;0.001) and visit the emergency department within 90-days (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.18, p=0.05), but had negligible differences in reoperation rates at 90 days to 2 years (OR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.78-1.63, p=0.53). Subgroup analysis identified higher likelihood for 90-day emergency department admissions among non-White patients compared to White patients, which were significantly compounded by Medicare insurance (OR: 2.95, 95% CI 1.46-5.95, p=0.002), median income in the lowest quartile (OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.2-2.61, p=0.012), and residence in low-income neighborhoods (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.31-3.2, p=0.006). Subgroup analysis for charges billed and reoperation did not identify significant findings. Conclusions: Hip arthroscopy remains an increasingly utilized surgical technique for the treatment of a myriad of hip disorders. Unfortunately, racial disparities exist and are worsening over time. Irrespective of insurance status, non-white patients undergo hip arthroscopy at a lower rate, incur higher costs, and more frequently experience unexpected returns to the emergency department. Improved initiatives to improve the disparity in access to and outcomes following hip arthroscopy must be addressed to further its utility for all patients.

An evaluation of outpatient pediatric asthma prescribing patterns in the United States

Pediatric asthma is often under-diagnosed and under-treated, resulting in a lack of concentration, difficulty sleeping, and tiredness. The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines recommended that children should be prescribed maintenance inhalers along with rescue inhalers. Concurrent use of rescue and maintenance inhalers were considered appropriate use for this study. The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing patterns against various patient and prescriber demographic factors. A total of 2,264 patients meeting the inclusion criteria for ICD 10 codes, J45.20 - J45.52 and age less than 18 were extracted from the 2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), which captures ambulatory services offered in physicians’ offices directly engaged in patient care. This data is collected by the National Center of Health Statistics (NCHS), a division of the CDC. The data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, two-tailed t-tests, and ANOVA with an alpha significance level at 0.05. The majority of the pediatric patient population was in the age range of 17-18 years old. Overall, more patients were prescribed inappropriately (68.3%) as compared to appropriate prescribing (31.7%). Inappropriate prescribing was seen more for patients with Medicaid (24.8%) and self-payment (38.2%) as compared to other types of payment (p= 0.052). General practice/ family physicians (35.1%) and nurse practitioners (20.9%) prescribed more inappropriately as compared to other prescribers. (p= 0.001). Patients from the Southern region of the U.S. were prescribed more inappropriately compared to the other regions in the U.S. (p= 0.205). This study concluded that a significant number of pediatric asthma patients across all demographics were not appropriately prescribed inhalers, thus not adhering to GINA guidelines. Appropriate prescribing and adhering to guidelines would prevent morbidity, mortality and improve the patient's quality of life, thereby saving healthcare costs.

Practice Patterns in the Operative Management of Pediatric Thyroid Disease Across Surgical Specializations

BackgroundMultiple surgical specializations are involved in the operative management of pediatric thyroid disease, but current practice patterns remain unknown. The objective of this study was to examine current practice patterns in the operative management of pediatric thyroid disease, specifically comparing practices across different surgical specializations including pediatric surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, general surgery, adult otolaryngology, and endocrine-focused general surgery. MethodsChildren 0-18 years-old undergoing thyroid surgery from 2015 to 2019 were identified using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases across 6 states. Surgeon specialization was determined for all included surgeons. Patient and hospital characteristics were compared across surgical specializations. Clinical outcomes including hypocalcemia/hypoparathyroidism, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hematoma, and wound infection were assessed. ResultsA total of 1241 pediatric thyroidectomies performed by 363 surgeons were included. Procedures were most frequently performed by pediatric surgeons (34.9%). Only 7.2% of procedures were performed by adult general surgeons. There were statistically significant differences in patient age, sociodemographics, surgical indications, and type of procedure performed between specializations (p < 0.05). Endocrine-focused general surgeons had the highest average annual thyroid procedure volume with 78.2 cases/year, and pediatric surgeons and pediatric otolaryngologists had the lowest volumes with 0.7 and 0.6 cases/year, respectively. Overall complication rates were low. ConclusionsOperative management of pediatric thyroid disease was most frequently performed by pediatric surgery. Pediatric specializations are more likely to operate on low-income, minority children with public insurance and patients with Graves’ disease. Overall complications were low. Level of EvidenceIII.

Clinical effectiveness of rehabilitation in ambulatory care for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19: a systematic review

BackgroundLingering symptoms after acute COVID-19 present a major challenge to ambulatory care services. Since there are reservations regarding their optimal management, we aimed to collate all available evidence on the effects of rehabilitation treatments applicable in ambulatory care for these patients.MethodsOn 9 May 2022, we systematically searched articles in COVID-19 collections, Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycArticles, PEDro, and EuropePMC. References were eligible if they reported on the clinical effectiveness of a rehabilitation therapy applicable in ambulatory care for adult patients with persisting symptoms continuing 4 weeks after the onset of COVID-19. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the CASP cohort study checklist and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Summary of Findings tables were constructed and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework.ResultsWe included 38 studies comprising 2,790 participants. Physical training and breathing exercises may reduce fatigue, dyspnoea, and chest pain and may improve physical capacity and quality of life, but the evidence is very weak (based on 6 RCTs and 12 cohort studies). The evidence underpinning the effect of nutritional supplements on fatigue, dyspnoea, muscle pain, sensory function, psychological well-being, quality of life, and functional capacity is very poor (based on 4 RCTs). Also, the evidence-base is very weak about the effect of olfactory training on sensory function and quality of life (based on 4 RCTs and 3 cohort studies). Multidisciplinary treatment may have beneficial effects on fatigue, dyspnoea, physical capacity, pulmonary function, quality of life, return to daily life activities, and functional capacity, but the evidence is very weak (based on 5 cohort studies). The certainty of evidence is very low due to study limitations, inconsistency, indirectness, and imprecision.ConclusionsPhysical training, breathing exercises, olfactory training and multidisciplinary treatment can be effective rehabilitation therapies for patients with persisting symptoms after COVID-19, still with high uncertainty regarding these effects. These findings can guide ambulatory care practitioners to treat these patients and should be incorporated in clinical practice guidelines. High-quality studies are needed to confirm our hypotheses and should report on adverse events.

A study analyzing outcomes after bariatric surgery by primary language.

Communication is key to success in bariatric surgery. This study aims to understand how outcomes after bariatric surgery differ between patients with a non-English primary language and those with English as their primary language. This retrospective, observational cohort study of bariatric surgery patients age ≥ 18years utilized the Michigan, Maryland, and New Jersey State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases, 2016 to 2018. Patients were classified by primary spoken language: English and non-English. Primary outcome was complications. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and cost, with cost calculated using cost-to-charge ratios provided by Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project and reported in 2019 United States dollars. Multivariable regression models (logistic, Poisson, and quantile) were used to examine associations between primary language and outcomes. Given the uneven distribution of race by primary language, interaction terms were used to examine conditional effects of race. Among 69,749 bariatric surgery patients, 2811 (4.2%) spoke a non-English primary language. Covariates, notably race distribution, and unadjusted outcomes differed significantly by primary language. However, after adjustment, non-English primary language was not associated with significantly increased odds of complications (odds ratio 1.24, p = 0.389), significantly different LOS (-0.02days, p = 0.677), nor significantly different mean healthcare costs (-$265, p = 0.309). There were no significant conditional effects of race seen among outcomes. Though non-English primary language was associated with a significantly different distribution of observable characteristics (including race, income quartile, and insurance type), after adjustment, non-English primary language was not associated with significant differential risk of adverse outcomes after bariatric surgery, and there were no significant conditional effects of race. As such, this study suggests that disparities in bariatric surgery by primary spoken language more likely related to access to care, or the pre- and post-hospital care continuum, rather than index hospitalization after surgery.

Quality of pain management in patients with cancer in the outpatient setting.

12106 Background: Pain represents a common health issue among patients with cancer. Uncontrolled pain significantly impairs the quality of life, resulting in increased healthcare utilization and costs. We examined the patterns of pain medication prescriptions among patients with cancer pain in the outpatient setting. Methods: We used the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS), an annually administered survey designed to collect data regarding the use of ambulatory medical services from office-based physicians in the United States. We analyzed NAMCS data from 2005 to 2019 for all types of cancers visits. The primary outcome was prescription of pain medications among patients with cancer pain. We performed multivariate logistic regression to identify factors associated with opioid and non-opioid prescription among patients with cancer pain. Results: We captured a total of 520.8 million outpatient visits from 2005-2019. Breast cancer (18.7%) followed by cancer of the male genital tract (11.0%) represented the highest proportion of patient visits. 4.8% of cancer patients reported pain. Majority (60%) complaining of pain did not receive any pain medications. 14.9% received opioids and 25.1% received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, or adjuvant pain medications. The odds of receiving opioids were 3.4 times higher among 45-65 years vs patients over 75 years. African-Americans had 84% higher odds of receiving opioid prescription compared to white patients. The odds of receiving opioids were 61% lower for privately insured vs patients on Medicare. Patients visiting oncologic care had 2.1 times higher odds of receiving opioids compared to primary care (Table). Conclusions: This is one of the largest drug utilization studies among patients with cancer in outpatient setting, covering half a billion patient visits. A significant proportion of outpatients with cancer who reported pain did not receive a prescription for analgesics suggesting a possibility of undertreatment of pain. Within the limitation of this dataset, undertreatment of pain in outpatients with cancer remains a major unmet patient need. [Table: see text]