Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements Research Articles

SEVERITY OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER AMONG HYPERTENSIVE AND NORMOTENSIVE UKRAINIAN REFUGEE WOMEN IN DIFFERENT LIVING CONDITIONS

Objective: The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has led to the exposure of a substantial number of residents to traumatic events and significant stress. A considerable portion of the Ukrainian population, particularly women and children, has sought refuge outside the country to evade the war's impact. Among the Ukrainian refugees in Poland, varying living conditions prevail, potentially influencing the intensity of their stress levels. This study aims to investigate the potential association between living conditions (within or outside dormitories) and the severity of emotional distress and post-traumatic stress disorders (PTSD) in Ukrainian women seeking asylum in Poland. Design and method: The study included 98 refugee women living in dormitories and 52 refugees renting apartments in Sopot, Poland. Relevant demographic and clinical data were obtained. Blood pressure (BP) was measured using validated oscillometric devices. Furthermore, subjects filled validated questionnaires for depression, stress and anxiety (DASS) and PTSD (PCL-5). Subjects with and without hypertension were compared for both general and psychological characteristics. Results: There were no significant differences in BP levels and the percentage of normotensive and hypertensive patients between two groups. Nevertheless, compared to subjects living in dormitories, refugees leasing apartments exhibited significantly higher DASS scores (30.6±15.7 vs. 19.9±13.4, p<0.0001). This group also included a higher proportion of women with moderate to severe scores for depression (65 vs 32%, p<0.0001), anxiety (83 vs 53%, p<0.001), and stress (69 vs 40%, p<0.0001). Furthermore, refugees renting apartments scored higher for PTSD score (33.5±14.7 vs 21.6±14.1, p<0.0001) particularly regarding intrusion (cluster B, p=0.002), negative alteration in cognition (cluster D, p=0.01) and hyper-arousal (cluster E, p=0.0001) dimensions, and a higher proportion met the criteria of PTSD (60 vs 27%, p<0.0001). Conclusions: Refugees residing in leased apartments exhibited comparable rates of hypertension but demonstrated heightened emotional distress and PTSD compared to their counterparts in dormitories. These differences may reflect the positive impact of social support and cohabitation with individuals who share similar traumatic experiences. Further investigations will include in-depth cardiovascular assessment, 24-hour ambulatory BP measurement, reassessment of stress/PTSD questionnaires, and psychiatric consultation.

Atrial Fibrillation Screening During Routine Automated Office, Home, and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often asymptomatic and undiagnosed. As AF and hypertension often coexist, opportunistic AF detection during routine automated blood pressure (BP) measurement appears to be an attractive screening method. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify studies assessing the diagnostic test accuracy of office, home, or 24-hour ambulatory BP measuring devices with AF detection algorithms versus reference electrocardiography. Analyses were performed per participant (AF status based on several BP readings; most office/home devices) or per reading (AF status based on individual readings; all ambulatory devices). A meta-analysis stratified by device type (office/home/ambulatory) was conducted to calculate pooled measures of diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity/meta-regression analyses were also performed. Among 3096 records initially retrieved, 23 diagnostic test accuracy studies were included. Data derived from 11 093 individuals (weighted age 69 years, males 56%, hypertensives 79%, diabetics 24%, and AF prevalence 17%) indicated a pooled sensitivity 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99), specificity 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95), and accuracy 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.95), with generally consistent results using office, home, or ambulatory BP devices (slightly lower specificity with the latter). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.60-0.80) and 0.99 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00), respectively. Sensitivity analyses indicated lower specificity in studies implementing reading versus participant analyses. Most studies presented a low risk of bias and minor applicability concerns. There is considerable and consistent evidence suggesting high diagnostic accuracy of AF detection algorithms implemented in automated BP monitors during routine BP measurements in and out of the office. AF diagnosis requires verification (electrocardiography) before treatment is administered.

Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Their Effects on Cardiometabolic Health: An 8-Week Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Plant-Based Meat Analogs With Their Corresponding Animal-Based Foods

BackgroundWith the growing popularity of plant-based meat analogs (PBMAs), an investigation of their effects on health is warranted in an Asian population. ObjectivesThis research investigated the impact of consuming an omnivorous animal-based meat diet (ABMD) compared with a PBMAs diet (PBMD) on cardiometabolic health among adults with elevated risk of diabetes in Singapore. MethodsIn an 8-wk parallel design randomized controlled trial, participants (n = 89) were instructed to substitute habitual protein-rich foods with fixed quantities of either PBMAs (n = 44) or their corresponding animal-based meats (n = 45; 2.5 servings/d), maintaining intake of other dietary components. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol served as primary outcome, whereas secondary outcomes included other cardiometabolic disease-related risk factors (e.g. glucose and fructosamine), dietary data, and within a subpopulation, ambulatory blood pressure measurements (n = 40) at baseline and postintervention, as well as a 14-d continuous glucose monitor (glucose homeostasis-related outcomes; n = 37). ResultsData from 82 participants (ABMD: 42 and PBMD: 40) were examined. Using linear mixed-effects model, there were significant interaction (time × treatment) effects for dietary trans-fat (increased in ABMD), dietary fiber, sodium, and potassium (all increased in PBMD; P-interaction <0.001). There were no significant effects on the lipid-lipoprotein profile, including LDL cholesterol. Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was lower in the PBMD group (P-interaction=0.041), although the nocturnal DBP dip markedly increased in ABMD (+3.2% mean) and was reduced in PBMD (-2.6%; P-interaction=0.017). Fructosamine (P time=0.035) and homeostatic model assessment for β-cell function were improved at week 8 (P time=0.006) in both groups. Glycemic homeostasis was better regulated in the ABMD than PBMD groups as evidenced by interstitial glucose time in range (ABMD median: 94.1% (Q1:87.2%, Q3:96.7%); PBMD: 86.5% (81.7%, 89.4%); P = 0.041). The intervention had no significant effect on the other outcomes examined. ConclusionsAn 8-wk PBMA diet did not show widespread cardiometabolic health benefits compared with a corresponding meat based diet. Nutritional quality is a key factor to be considered for next generation PBMAs.This trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/as NCT05446753.

Non-dipping blood pressure pattern is associated with cardiovascular events in a 21-year follow-up study.

Non-dipping blood pressure (BP) pattern is a predictor for cardiovascular (CV) events and mortality. We evaluated dipping status change and its association with incidence of non-fatal CV events in middle-aged subjects. The OPERA study was carried out during the years 1991-1993, with a follow-up study 21.7 years later. In this study, we included 452 participants with 24-h ambulatory BP measurements (ABPM) available in both surveys. The study population was divided into four groups according to the dipping pattern change: dipping-dipping (n = 152/33.6%), dipping-non-dipping (n = 198/43.8%), non-dipping-dipping (n = 20/4.4%), and non-dipping-non-dipping (n = 82/18.1%). Sixty-five participants experienced a CV event (14.4%) during the 21.7 (SD 0.8) years of follow-up. The incidence of events was highest (28%) in the non-dipping-non-dipping group, and lowest (6.6%) in the dipping-dipping group (p < 0.001). In Cox regression analyses the covariates were age, sex, total cholesterol, hypertension and use of antihypertensive medication, systolic office BP and ambulatory mean or nighttime systolic BP, as well as the change in the variables during the follow-up period. After adjustments, the association of the non-dipping-non-dipping pattern with CV events compared with the dipping-dipping pattern remained significant (HR 4.01; 95% CI 1.89-8.67, p < 0.001). In summary, non-dipping-non-dipping pattern was associated with non-fatal CV events in the long term, and the effect was independent of the conventional risk factors including office and ambulatory BP levels.

Associations of Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurements With High-Sensitivity Troponin and Natriuretic Peptide Levels in SPRINT.

Nighttime blood pressure (BP) has greater prognostic importance for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than daytime BP, but less is known about nighttime and daytime BP associations with measures of subclinical CVD. Among 897 Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial Study (SPRINT) participants with 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring obtained near the 27-month study visit, 849 (95%) had N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) measured at the 24-month study visit. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the associations of nighttime and daytime BP with cardiac biomarker levels. The mean age was 69 ± 12 years, 28% were African American, and mean nighttime and daytime SBP were 121 ± 16 mm Hg and 132 ± 14 mm Hg, respectively. In multivariable models, compared with the lowest tertile of nighttime systolic BP, the highest tertile was associated with 48% higher NT-proBNP levels (adjusted geometric mean ratio [GMR] = 1.48, 95% CI: 1.22, 1.79), and 19% higher hs-cTnT levels (adjusted GMR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.32). In contrast, the highest vs. lowest tertile of daytime systolic BP was not associated with NT-proBNP (adjusted GMR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.88, 1.34), but was associated with 16% higher hs-cTnT levels (adjusted GMR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.30). Similar results were observed using diastolic BP. In SPRINT, both higher nighttime and daytime BP were independently associated with higher hs-cTnT levels, but only higher nighttime BP was associated with higher NT-proBNP levels.

Office or home versus 24-h blood pressure measurement in stable kidney transplant recipients.

The aim of this study was to quantify hypertension control and evaluate concordance between all commonly available blood pressure (BP) modalities in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). For this prospective cross-sectional study, 89 stable KTRs were recruited at the Charité Transplant Outpatient Clinic. For each study participant office [manual office BP (MOBP) and automated office BP (AOBP)], 7-day home (HBPM) and 24-hour ambulatory BP (24h-ABPM) measurements were performed. 80 of the 89 patients recruited had sufficient BP recordings. The mean BP for MOBP, AOBP, HBPM and 24h-ABPM was 129/73, 126/71, 131/85 and 130/81mmHg, respectively. Uncontrolled hypertension, as defined by 24h-ABPM (mean ≥130/80mmHg), was present in 53 (66%) patients. MOBP, AOBP and HBPM classified 19 (24%), 22 (28%) and 41 (51%) patients, respectively, as 'uncontrolled hypertensive'. The Bland-Altman plot showed good agreement between systolic MOBP, AOBP, HBPM and daytime-ABPM (mean bias: -1±13mmHg, -4±13mmHg, 1±10mmHg, respectively). Uncontrolled night-time hypertension was present in 74 (93%) KTRs, with 71 (89%) patients showing a non-physiological dipping pattern. Moderate positive correlation between daytime-ABPM/HBPM and night-time-ABPM (Pearson correlation coefficients: 0.62-0.73), followed by MOBP/AOBP (Pearson correlation coefficients: 0.49-0.59) was noted. Estimated eGFR and proteinuria displayed weak correlation with 24h-, daytime- and night-time-ABPM (absolute values of Pearson correlation coefficients: 0.04-0.41). No robust association with either 24h-, daytime- or night-time-ABPM was observed for volume status exams. Masked hypertension is highly prevalent in KTRs, especially due to high rates of uncontrolled night-time hypertension. HBPM shows the narrowest limits of agreement with daytime-ABPM. Daytime-ABPM and HBPM show the highest, albeit clinically insufficient, correlation with night-time-ABPM. Systematic integration of 24h-ABPM into clinical practice, as proposed by the 2023 ESH guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension, should not be withheld for the KTR population. Clinical trials evaluating the treatment of hypertension in KTRs are urgently needed.

A Survey on Blood Pressure Measurement Technologies: Addressing Potential Sources of Bias.

Regular blood pressure (BP) monitoring in clinical and ambulatory settings plays a crucial role in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and management of cardiovascular diseases. Recently, the widespread adoption of ambulatory BP measurement devices has been predominantly driven by the increased prevalence of hypertension and its associated risks and clinical conditions. Recent guidelines advocate for regular BP monitoring as part of regular clinical visits or even at home. This increased utilization of BP measurement technologies has raised significant concerns regarding the accuracy of reported BP values across settings. In this survey, which focuses mainly on cuff-based BP monitoring technologies, we highlight how BP measurements can demonstrate substantial biases and variances due to factors such as measurement and device errors, demographics, and body habitus. With these inherent biases, the development of a new generation of cuff-based BP devices that use artificial intelligence (AI) has significant potential. We present future avenues where AI-assisted technologies can leverage the extensive clinical literature on BP-related studies together with the large collections of BP records available in electronic health records. These resources can be combined with machine learning approaches, including deep learning and Bayesian inference, to remove BP measurement biases and provide individualized BP-related cardiovascular risk indexes.

Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index as a Marker of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Treated Hypertensives: Findings From the Pamela Study.

Findings regarding the association between Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) and cardiac hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD), such as left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) assessed by echocardiography, in elderly hypertensive patients are scanty. We sought to investigate this issue in the hypertensive fraction of the general population treated with anti-hypertensive drugs enrolled in the Pressioni Monitorate E Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study. The study included 239 out of 562 participants who attended the second and third surveys of the PAMELA study performed after 10 and 25 years from the initial evaluation. Data collection included medical history, anthropometric parameters, office, home, ambulatory blood pressure (BP), blood examinations, echocardiography, and CAVI measurements. In the whole study sample (age 69 ± 9 years, 54% males), CAVI was positively correlated with age, office, home, ambulatory systolic BP, LV mass (LVM) index, and negatively associated with body mass index (BMI). In multivariate analysis, CAVI was associated with the LVM index (P < 0.05) independently of major confounders. The participants with LVH exhibited significantly higher CAVI (10.6 ± 2.8 vs. 9.2 ± 1.8 m/s P < 0.001), larger left atrial diameter, and lower LV ejection fraction values than their counterparts without it. The CAVI value of 9.4 m/s was the best cut-off for prediction of LVH in the whole sample. Our study provides new evidence of an independent association between CAVI and LVH in treated elderly hypertensive patients and suggests that the use of this metric of arterial stiffness could not only be used to evaluate vascular damage but also to stratify the risk of LVH.

Validation of the Raycome model M2 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the Raycome model M2 oscillometric upper-arm blood pressure (BP) monitor developed for ambulatory BP measurement in the general population according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) at rest and during dynamic exercise. Subjects were recruited to fulfill the age, gender, BP and cuff distribution criteria of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard in the general population using the same arm sequential BP measurement method. Three cuffs of the test device were used for arm circumference 18-22 cm (small), 22-32 cm (medium) and 32-42 cm (large). For the general validation study, 106 subjects were recruited and 85 were analyzed. For validation criterion 1, the mean ± SD of the differences between the test device and reference BP readings was 0.5 ± 6.2/-0.2 ± 5.1 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). For criterion 2, the SD of the mean BP differences between the test device and reference BP per subject was 5.23/4.50 mmHg (systolic/diastolic). In the ambulatory validation study ( N = 35), the mean difference was 0.4 ± 5.9/-1.1 ± 5.8 mmHg. The Raycome model M2 performed well against the standard in both the general and ambulatory validations and the Bland-Altman plots did not show any systematic variation in the error. These data show that the Raycome model M2 monitor meets the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) and in the ambulatory setting, indicating its suitability for measuring BP in the general population.

The role of wearable home blood pressure monitoring in detecting out-of-office control status

Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and home blood pressure (HBP) monitoring is currently recommended for management of hypertension. Nonetheless, traditional HBP protocols could overlook diurnal fluctuations, which could also be linked with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. In this observational study, we studied among a group of treated hypertensive patients (N = 62, age: 52.4 ± 10.4 years) by using out-of-office ABP and wearable HBP. They received one session of 24-h ABP measurement with an oscillometric upper-arm monitor, and totally three sessions of 7-day/6-time-daily wearable HBP measurement separated in each month with HeartGuide. Controlled hypertension is defined as an average BP <130/80 mmHg for both daytime ABP and HBP. There was substantial reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC 0.883–0.911) and good reproducibility (Cohen’s kappa = 0.600) for wearable HBP measurement, especially before breakfast and after dinner. Among all patients, 27.4% had both uncontrolled HBP and ABP, 30.6% had uncontrolled HBP only, while 6.5% had uncontrolled ABP only. Female gender and increased numbers of anti-hypertensive agents are correlated with controlled hypertension. Patients with uncontrolled hypertension had a significantly higher maximal daytime blood pressure, which was previously signified as an imperial marker for cardiovascular risk. In conclusion, wearable HBP monitoring in accordance with a dedicated daily-living schedule results in good reliability and reproducibility. Patients with an uncontrolled wearable HBP should benefit from repeated HBP or ABP measurement for risk stratification.

Using 15-Minute Serial Blood Pressures as an Alternative to Measuring a Single Blood Pressure.

Thirty-minute office blood pressure (OBP-30) is an alternative to ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement, yet is impractical to implement. This study aimed to determine whether unattended BP readings over 15 minutes would result in a similar probability of obtaining a BP of <140/90. Sixty-seven adults self-described as having high BP were analyzed. BP was measured at baseline and every 5 minutes for 15 minutes with the initial reading compared to the average of the last three readings (OBP-15). Compared to baseline, there was a decline in both average systolic (4.2 points) and diastolic (2.8 points) BP. The probability of BP control predicted by multivariate model was 71.6% at baseline and 78.0% using OBP-15 (p=0.011). The increase in BP control from initial to OBP-15 measurement was significant for indigenous or persons of color compared to whites, and men compared to women. OBP-15 is convenient and results in lower BP readings and higher probability of BP control compared to the initial reading.

Prognostic value of home versus ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcome studies.

Ambulatory (ABP) and self-home blood pressure (HBP) measurements are known to be superior to office blood pressure (OBP) measurements in predicting cardiovascular events. Whether ABP has superior prognostic ability than HBP, or the reverse, has not been adequately investigated. A systematic literature search was conducted to identify outcome studies investigating HBP and ABP in the same population. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the pooled measure of risk regarding the primary endpoint of each study for each method. Primary analysis included the comparison of pooled estimates of HBP versus 24 h ABP. Among 2587 articles retrieved, 6 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of five studies ( n = 4439, weighted age 57 years, men 52%, hypertension 68%, diabetes 15%, cardiovascular disease 11%) indicated pooled hazard ratio per 10 mmHg increase in systolic HBP 1.36 (95% CI 1.23-1.50) and in 24 h ABP 1.38 (1.22-1.57) for the primary endpoint of each study ( z -test P = NS). Meta-analysis of five studies ( n = 4497, weighted age 58 years, men 51%, hypertension 65%, diabetes 15%, cardiovascular disease 9%) indicated pooled hazard ratio per 10 mmHg increase in systolic HBP 1.29 (1.14-1.47), daytime ABP 1.30 (1.15-1.46) and nighttime ABP 1.31 (1.14-1.50) ( z -test, P = NS). Data for DBP were similar. All studies were deemed to have low risk of bias. In studies comparing all the three methods, OBP provided the lowest hazard ratio. This meta-analysis of the available prospective outcome studies suggested that HBP and ABP have similar ability in predicting outcome and superior to OBP.

The Effect of "Unclassified" Blood Pressure Phenotypes on Left Ventricular Hypertrophy.

We aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the "unclassified" blood pressure phenotypes on left ventricular hypertrophy in children. All children evaluated with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the pediatric nephrology department between October 2018 and January 2021 were included in the study. Prehypertension, normotensive, white coat hypertension, masked hypertension, ambulatory hypertension groups and 2 other groups including increased blood pressure load, normal ambulatory blood pressure measurements, but normal (unclassified group 1) or high (unclassified group 2) office blood pressure measurements were defined according to the American Heart Association 2014 statement. Left ventricular mass index, left ventricular mass index/95 percentile values, and left ventricular hypertrophy ratios were compared between the groups separately to establish the influence of the unclassified cases. A total of 497 children were included. There were 52 cases in normotensive, 47 cases in unclassified group 1, 50 cases in masked hypertension, 79 cases in white coat hypertension, 104 cases in unclassified group 2, and 165 cases in the ambulatory hypertension group. Left ventricular mass index/95 percentile and left ventricular hypertrophy in masked hypertension were significantly higher than normotensive but similar between normotensive and unclassified group 1 groups. Left ventricular hypertrophy was significantly higher in the ambulatory hypertension group compared to white coat hypertension, and similar between white coat hypertension and unclassified group 2 groups. Independent of age, we have found that interpretation of blood pressure load not only has a limited predictable effect on left ventricular hypertrophy but also causes a large group of patients to be unclassified. Cite this article as: Kasap-Demir B, Başaran C, Demircan T, et al. The effect of "unclassified" blood pressure phenotypes on left ventricular hypertrophy. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2024;59(1):43-48.

Blood pressure measurements for diagnosing hypertension in primary care: room for improvement

BackgroundIn the adult population, about 50% have hypertension, a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and subsequent premature death. Little is known about the quality of the methods used to diagnose hypertension in primary care.ObjectivesThe objective was to assess the frequency of use of recognized methods to establish a diagnosis of hypertension, and specifically for OBPM, whether three distinct measurements were taken, and how correctly the blood pressure levels were interpreted.MethodsA retrospective population-based cohort study using electronic medical records of patients aged between 40 and 70 years, who visited their general practitioner (GP) with a new-onset of hypertension in the years 2012, 2016, 2019, and 2020. A visual chart review of the electronic medical records was used to assess the methods employed to diagnose hypertension in a random sample of 500 patients. The blood pressure measurement method was considered complete if three or more valid office blood pressure measurements (OBPM) were performed, or home-based blood pressure measurements (HBPM), the office- based 30-minute method (OBP30), or 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurements (24 H-ABPM) were used.ResultsIn all study years, OBPM was the most frequently used method to diagnose new-onset hypertension in patients. The OBP-30 method was used in 0.4% (2012), 4.2% (2016), 10.6% (2019), and 9.8% (2020) of patients respectively, 24 H-ABPM in 16.0%, 22.2%, 17.2%, and 19.0% of patients and HBPM measurements in 5.4%, 8.4%, 7.6%, and 7.8% of patients, respectively. A diagnosis of hypertension based on only one or two office measurements occurred in 85.2% (2012), 87.9% (2016), 94.4% (2019), and 96.8% (2020) of all patients with OBPM. In cases of incomplete measurement and incorrect interpretation, medication was still started in 64% of cases in 2012, 56% (2016), 60% (2019), and 73% (2020).ConclusionOBPM is still the most often used method to diagnose hypertension in primary care. The diagnosis was often incomplete or misinterpreted using incorrect cut-off levels. A small improvement occurred between 2012 and 2016 but no further progress was seen in 2019 or 2020. If hypertension is inappropriately diagnosed, it may result in under treatment or in prolonged, unnecessary treatment of patients. There is room for improvement in the general practice setting.

Robust Feature Selection for BP Estimation in Multiple Populations: Towards Cuffless Ambulatory BP Monitoring.

Current blood pressure (BP) estimation methods have not achieved an accurate and adaptable approach for ambulatory diagnosis and monitoring applications of populations at risk of cardiovascular disease, generally due to a limited sample size. This paper introduces an algorithm for BP estimation solely reliant on photoplethysmography (PPG) signals and demographic features. It automatically obtains signal features and employs the Markov Blanket (MB) feature selection to discern informative and transmissible features, achieving a robust space adaptable to the population shift. This approach was validated with the Aurora-BP database, compromising ambulatory wearable cuffless BP measurements for over 500 individuals. After evaluating several machine-learning regression methods, Gradient Boosting emerged as the most effective. According to the MB feature selection, temporal, frequency, and demographic features ranked highest in importance, while statistical ones were deemed non-significant. A comparative assessment of a generic model (trained on unclassified BP data) and specialized models (tailored to each distinct BP population), demonstrated a consistent superiority of our proposed MB feature space with a mean absolute error of [Formula: see text] for systolic BP and [Formula: see text] for diastolic BP on the whole dataset. Moreover, we present a first comparison of in-clinic vs. ambulatory models, with performance significantly lower for the latter with a drop of [Formula: see text] in systolic ( ) and [Formula: see text] for diastolic ( ) estimation errors. This work contributes to the resilient understanding of BP estimation algorithms from PPG signals, providing causal features in the signal and quantifying the disparities between ambulatory and in-clinic measurements.

Blood Pressure Regulation and Hypertension in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome: A Historical Perspective.

In obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), an underlying disease of secondary hypertension, repeated episodes of asphyxia due to obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), followed by arousal, lead to various cardiovascular consequences. Using a canine model of OSAS, it was found that a single load of OSA caused an abrupt increase in blood pressure (BP) (Apnea Surge in seconds), while multiple OSA episodes occurring nightly for 1-3 months led to a sustained elevation of BP during both nighttime and daytime. Epidemiological studies on 24-hour ambulatory BP measurements revealed that some hypertensive patients experienced elevated BP in the early morning (Morning Surge), which could be intensified by OSAS. The resonance of Apnea Surge in seconds and Morning Surge increases the risk of organ damage, triggers the cardiovascular events, and adversely affects the prognosis of hypertensive patients with OSAS.For ameliorating these risks, OSA should be treated with positive airway pressure properly.

Treatment of arterial hypertension in patients with severe obesity

IntroductionObesity is one of the most important cardiovascular risk factors for mortality. It increases the risk of developing hypertension and influences the response to antihypertensive drugs. Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) is a tool for a detailed analysis of mean blood pressure values and assessing the blood pressure (BP) profile during the night with the daily values and optimal treatment determination.AimThe study aimed to evaluation the type of antihypertensive drugs and control assessment of hypertension based on ABPM in patients with severe obesity.Material and methodsThe study group consisted of 129 overweight and obese patients (group 1: BMI &lt; 40 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;; group 2: BMI ≥ 40 kg/m&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt;).They were interviewed, taking into account the antihypertensive drugs taken. We divided drugs into 5 groups: beta-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) / angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB), diuretics, calcium channel blockers and others. Mean systolic BP and diastolic BP from the day, day and night, mean heart rate from day to day was assessed based on ABPM.Results and discussionThe most frequently administered drugs in both groups were ACE-I/ARB. The second most often taken drug was β-blocker and diuretics. Group 1 was significantly older than group 2. Based on the analysis, HR level was significantly dependent on age, BMI, and diabetes. The systolic BP and diastolic BP level was dependent on age and sex.ConclusionsOnly a combination of individually designed pharmacological therapy with personalized dietary interventions, regular exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy, and bariatric interventions, when needed, could guarantee the final success. ABPM should be used routinely in every patients to control assessment of hypertension.

Seasonal effects on blood pressure variability in treated hypertensive patients assessed by office, home, and ambulatory measurements.

This study investigated the seasonal effect on blood pressure (BP) variability. Patients on stable antihypertensive drug treatment were assessed with office (OBP), home (HBP), and ambulatory BP (ABP) measurements in winter, next summer, and in next winter. Fifty-eight participants with full data for winter and summer were analyzed (mean age 65.2 ± 7.9 [SD], 64% males). OBP, HBP and ABP (24-h; daytime) were lower in summer than in winter (P < 0.01), whereas nighttime ABP was unchanged (p = NS). Standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV) and average real variability (ARV) for systolic OBP were higher in winter than summer (p < 0.01/ < 0.05/ < 0.01, respectively). These indices for HBP and ABP measurements did not differ in winter and summer (p = NS). Forty participants had complete data for winter-summer-next winter and HBP/ABP variability indices did not differ for both winters versus summer. These preliminary data suggest that BP variability is unaffected by seasonal changes in contrast to average BP levels.

Features of the arterial hypertension course and arterial stiffness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis who get infected COVID-19

Objective: to evaluate the features of development and course of arterial hypertension (AH) and changes in vascular stiffness in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) who underwent COVID-19. Materials and methods: 60 patients with a reliable diagnosis of AS were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the presence of COVID - 19 in anamnesis. The main group consisted of 30 patients with AS who had suffered COVID-19 of varying severity during the previous 12 months. The comparison group consisted of 30 patients with AS who had no laboratory and clinically confirmed COVID-19 infection within the last year. Patients were interviewed regarding the severity of their previous coronavirus infection and persisting symptoms in the post-COVID-19 period. AS activity was evaluated by ASDAS (CRB, BASDAI-index). BP measurement and study of arterial stiffness parameters by oscillographic method, evaluation of the results of ambulatory BP measurement were performed. Results: 6 (20%) patients had BP destabilization at the outpatient stage during home BP measurement early after COVID-19. After 12 months, BP elevation persisted in only 2 (7%) patients, the rest had BP stabilization with withdrawal of antihypertensive drugs. No correlation between BP level, arterial stiffness and AS activity was found. There was a weak inverse correlation between the severity of coronavirus infection and the level of systolic blood pressure, between age and pulse wave velocity. No significant differences in systolic, diastolic blood pressure, pulse wave velocity, aortic augmentation index were found in patients with AS with and without coronavirus infection. In the main group, 1 fatal outcome due to the development of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction 6 months after COVID-19 was recorded, and no adverse cardiovascular events were registered among patients in the comparison group. Conclusion: it was hypothesized that patients with AS who underwent COVID-19 would be more likely to show BP elevation than those who did not undergo COVID-19. It was found that early after COVID-19 (first three months) a reversible increase in BP without significant changes in arterial stiffness is possible. However, no significant differences in the frequency of BP elevation, BP level, and arterial stiffness were found in patients with AS and COVID-19 or without COVID-19 in anamnesis.

Simultaneous 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement on both arms: a consideration for improving hypertension management.

Arterial hypertension is one of the common treatment goals in today's medicine. 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) performed by oscillometric cuff-based devices is considered as the gold standard in hypertension diagnostics. This study aims at examining the measurement accuracy of a widely used, ABPM device. Fifty-two young and healthy participants underwent simultaneous 24-h ABPM on the left and the right upper arm using two Boso/A&D TM-2430 oscillometric cuff-based devices. Pressure curves of the cuffs, as well as hydrostatic pressure difference between the cuffs were recorded. The mean differences between both simultaneous measurements were 1.16 mmHg with limits of agreement of 36.23 mmHg for SBP and 1.32 mmHg with limits of agreement of 32.65 mmHg for DBP. Excluding measurements where the pressure curves were disturbed and correcting for hydrostatic pressure difference between the cuffs, reduced the measurement error. However, limits of agreement remained around 20 mmHg. There were large differences in hypertension grading and dipping pattern classification between simultaneous measurements on the left and right arm. The cuff-based ABPM device reveals notable measurement uncertainties, influencing hypertension grading, dipping pattern classification and blood pressure variability. These effects are attributed in part to disturbances during cuff deflation and hydrostatic influences. Nonetheless, ABPM has shown its clinical values in several studies, while this study underscores its still unlocked potential to improve hypertension management.