Amblyogenic Risk Factors Research Articles

Prevalence of Amblyogenic Risk Factors Among School Children in India Using the Spot Vision Screener.

Amblyopia is a common cause of preventable visual impairment in children, affecting 1% to 6% globally. This study assesses amblyopia prevalence and risk factors among school children in rural Telangana, India, using the Spot Vision Screener (Welch Allyn, Inc., Skaneateles Falls, New York, USA), a portable, noninvasive device recommended for automated vision screening. A cross-sectional study was conducted on 714 schoolchildren aged 5-10 years. Screening was performed using the Spot Vision Screener, evaluating refractive errors, ocular alignment, and other amblyopia risk factors. Children identified with potential amblyogenic factors were referred for comprehensive ophthalmological evaluation to confirm diagnosis. Out of 714 children screened, 84 were referred by the Spot Vision Screener for further evaluation. Subsequent examination by ophthalmologists confirmed amblyopia in 65 children, resulting in a prevalence of 9.10%. Myopic refractive error was the most prevalent (69.23%), followed by astigmatism (21.53%) and hypermetropia (9.23%) among amblyopia cases. The Spot Vision Screener proved to be a reliable tool for identifying amblyopia risk factors in school children, facilitating early detection and referral for appropriate management. This study underscores the importance of implementing effective vision screening programs in rural settings to mitigate preventable childhood blindness.

Preschool Vision Screening: Prevalence and Associated Factors of Amblyopia among School Going Children in Dhaka City

Background: Amblyopia is a decrease in best-corrected visual acuity in one or both eyes due to form deficiency or abnormal binocular interaction. It affects infancy and adulthood for the individual and society as a whole. Amblyopia affects academic success, career choice, visuomotor skills, social interaction, psychological development, and economic participation. Unilateral amblyopia increases the likelihood of bilateral vision loss. Ocular media opacity, strabismus, anisometropia, hypermetropia, astigmatism, myopia, and blepharoptosis are risk factors for amblyopia. Ocular screening programs in young children, primarily preschoolers, may detect amblyopia and amblyogenic risk factors like as strabismus, refractive errors, and media opacities early. It prevents and treats amblyopia. It helps children's emotional growth. Diagnosis and treatment of amblyopia at a younger age may result in a better and more stable final VA because to shorter treatment durations, faster VA improvement, and greater treatment adherence. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine Preschool vision screening, prevalence and associated factors of amblyopia among school going children in Dhaka city. Methods and Material: Between January 1 and June 30, 2022, a cross-sectional survey of a community of Dhaka city residents in the school age range was carried out. Through interviews and physical exams, data were gathered using a pretested structured questionnaire and checklist. Using SPSS 23, descriptive and inferential analysis was performed, and variables with a p value of less than 0.2 were included into multivariate logistic regression. In the multivariable binary logistic regression, significant predictors were defined as variables with a p value of < 0.05. Result: Majority of the student are of 4-5 years age, among the participant 50.8% were male and 45.8% were female. Study showed that majority of the family has 1-2 (49.5%) and 3-4 (45.3%) children. Majority of the mother .......

Amblyogenic risk factors and validity of vision screening using spot-screener among kindergarten children in Qassim region, Saudi Arabia.

The purpose of the study was to present the outcomes of vision and amblyogenic risk factor (ARF) screening in kindergarten children in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. In this cross-sectional study, an optometrist conducted first-level screening in a kindergarten using a spot screener (Welch Allyn) in 2023. Refractive status and ocular alignment were evaluated. The visual acuity of each eye was measured. Those who failed the first screening or had impaired vision were re-evaluated at the second level of screening by an optometrist and pediatric ophthalmologist. Those who failed the screening in Kindergarten were referred to a pediatric ophthalmology clinic for confirmation and management (third level of screening). We screened 222 children (mean age: 5.9 ± 0.4 years, 111 boys). A total of 59 (26.6%) children failed the spot vision screening test. A vision screening test by an optometrist identified 58 (26.1%) children with impaired vision. Refractive errors (REs) for children who failed the spot screener included hyperopia in 4 (6.7%) children, high myopia (>6.00 D) in 2 (3.4%) children, and astigmatism in 53 (89.83%) children. Compared to the evaluation by optometrists and pediatric ophthalmologists at KGs, spot screening had 0.845 sensitivity and 0.939 specificity. Validity parameters differed for RE, vision impairment, amblyopia, and strabismus. Seventy-one (31.98%) children were referred for third-level screening, but only 32 (44.4%) children attended, and among them, the prevalence of amblyopia was 25%. The high prevalence of amblyopia and undetected ARFs necessitate establishing annual vision screening among 3- to 5-year-old children in the study area.

Subnormal visual acuity after compliant amblyopia therapy: residual/refractory amblyopia or co-existing pathology? - a retrospective analysis

ABSTRACT Purpose: To assess the prevalence of alternate etiology/co-existing pathology among patients with amblyopia, and to characterize factors contributing to over-diagnosis of amblyopia. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of children (from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2019) who were initially diagnosed as “amblyopia” but later an alternate diagnosis for subnormal vision was established. Patients who had a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of ≤20/32 (0.2 logMAR) after compliant amblyopia therapy were divided into 2 groups: those with refractory amblyopia (BCVA improvement from baseline <1 logMAR line) and residual amblyopia (BCVA improvement from baseline >1 logMAR line). Data was collected for presence/absence of amblyogenic risk factors, history, ocular examination, and investigations leading to the final alternate diagnosis. We analyzed the factors that contributed to the initial over-diagnosis of amblyopia using the diagnostic error evaluation and research (DEER) taxonomy tool. Results: During the study period, 508 children with an initial diagnosis of amblyopia met the study criteria. Among these 508 children, 466 were diagnosed to have amblyopia alone, while 26 children (5.1%, median age: 7 years, 17 boys: 9 girls) were revised to have an alternate diagnosis/co-existing pathology. These 26 patients comprised of 2 groups: children referred to us as amblyopia but rediagnosed to have an alternate diagnosis; and a second subset, initially diagnosed by us to have amblyopia, but later found to have alternate diagnosis/co-existing pathology. Subclinical optic neuritis (50%, 13 children), and occult macular dystrophy (OMD) (38.4%, 10 children) were the most frequent alternative diagnoses. Children with ametropic amblyopia (8/26, 30.7%) were most frequently misdiagnosed. Risk factors that led to an initial diagnosis of amblyopia were: high refractive error and heterotropia in 7 patients each (26.9%), anisometropia in 12 (46.1%), and prior pediatric cataract surgery in 4(15.3%). No improvement in BCVA in 21/26 (80.7%) children led to suspicion of co-existing etiology. Other clues were optic disc pallor (11), subnormal color vision (7), history of parental consanguinity in 7, and preceding febrile illness/rhinitis in 1 child. The DEER taxonomy tool suggested that the most common reasons for diagnostic errors were over-emphasis on amblyopia. Conclusion: Our study suggests that 5% of children diagnosed with amblyopia might have co-existing/alternate etiology. Most common co-existing etiologies were subclinical optic neuropathy, and OMD. No improvement in BCVA, subtle history and examination findings prompted further workup. Not considering co-existing etiologies was the most common reason for an initial overdiagnosis of amblyopia.

Amblyopia treatment outcomes in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders

To compare amblyopia treatment outcomes between patients with neurodevelopmental disorders and their typically developing peers. Of 2,311 patients diagnosed with amblyopia between 2010 and 2014 at Boston Children's Hospital, 460 met inclusion criteria (age 2-12 with anisometropic, strabismic, or mixed amblyopia [interocular difference (IOD) ≥2 lines]). Treatment and visual outcomes were analyzed according to neurodevelopmental status: neurodevelopmental delay (DD) versus typical development (TD). The DD group (n = 54) and TD group (n = 406) were similar in demographics, amblyogenic risk factors, baseline visual measures, prescribed therapy, and adherence (P ≥ 0.10). Between-visit follow-up time was longer for the DD group (0.65 [0.42- 0.97] years) than for the TD group (0.5 [0.36-0.82] years; P = 0.023). IOD improved similarly in each group by the last visit (DD, -0.15 logMAR [-0.31 to -0.02]; TD, -0.2 logMAR [-0.38 to -0.1]; P= 0.09). Each group reached amblyopia resolution by the last visit at similar frequencies (DD, 23/54 [43%]; TD, 211/406 [52%]; P > 0.2). DD diagnosis did not independently influence amblyopia resolution (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.53-1.12; P = 0.17), but each additional month of interval time between follow-up visits reduced the likelihood of resolution by 2.7% (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.51-0.87; P = 0.003). Patients with DD and those with TD responded similarly to amblyopia therapy; however, follow-up intervals were longer in patients with DD and correlated with the likelihood of persistent amblyopia, suggesting that greater efforts at assuring follow-up may benefit patients with DD.

Ophthalmic care of adults born preterm and full-term-results from the Gutenberg Prematurity Eye Study (GPES) : Premature birth and ophthalmological care

Prematurity and the presence of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) increase the risk for the occurrence of amblyogenic risk factors in childhood and adolescence. The aim of the present study was to evaluate ocular morbidities and the ophthalmological care of former preterm and full-term persons in adulthood. The Gutenberg prematurity eye study (GPES) is aretrospective cohort study with aprospective ophthalmological examination of individuals formerly born preterm and full term between 1969 and 2002 (now aged 18-52years). All participants underwent adetailed ophthalmological examination and were asked about the frequency of ophthalmological care. Participants were grouped into those with normal gestational age (GA) ≥ 37 weeks (control group), preterm individuals without ROP and GA 33-36 weeks (group2), GA 29-32 weeks (group3), GA ≤ 28weeks (group4), and those with ROP without treatment (group5) and with ROP with treatment (group6). All participants were asked if they had an ophthalmological examination within the last 12months. In total, data from 140 term and 310 preterm adults were included in the present study. Strabismus was present in 2.1 % (3/140), 6.6 % (9/137), 17.4 % (16/92), 11.1 % (2/18), 27.1 % (13/48) and 60 % (9/15) in groups1-6, respectively. The proportion of subjects with an ophthalmological examination within the last 12months was highest in the groups of extremely preterm persons with and without ROP compared with the control group. Overall, 33.3 % (1/3) of the term and 57.1 % (28/49) of the preterm subjects with strabismus and 0 % (0/3) of the term and 46.9 % (15/32) of the preterm individuals with amblyopia had an ophthalmological examination within the past 12months. Extremely preterm adults with and without postnatal ROP showed the highest rate of eye diseases as well as the highest rate of ophthalmological check-ups within the last 12months. This suggests that extremely preterm adults particularly with the occurrence of postnatal ROP perceive more frequent ophthalmological check-ups throughout their lives.

Performance of the Spot Vision Screener in children with Down syndrome and other special needs

Amblyopia is a common cause of monocular blindness and disproportionally affects developmentally delayed children. Photoscreeners have been suggested as a method to detect amblyogenic risk factors (ARF) in children with developmental disabilities who may not be amenable to traditional vision screening methods The Spot Vision Screener is a commonly used photoscreener for detecting ARF and has shown excellent sensitivity and accuracy in the general pediatric population. Spot’s performance in children with Down syndrome and other special needs is not as well substantiated.

Diagnostic Performance of Spot Photoscreener in Detecting Amblyogenic Risk Factors in Korean Children

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of spot vision screener in detecting refractive errors as amblyogenic risk factor in preschool Korean children.Methods: This prospective study included 51 children aged between 3 to 6 who underwent complete ophthalmologic evaluation including measurement of refraction using Spot&lt;sup&gt;TM&lt;/sup&gt; Vision Screener (VS100S-2, Welch Allyn Inc., Skaneateles Falls, NY; version 3.0.02.32) and an autorefractometer before and after cycloplegia. The sensitivity and specificity of Spot photoscreening for the detection of amblyogenic risk factors were calculated. We compared the outcome measures of refractive error using spot vision screener and the autorefractometer of non-cycloplegics and cycloplegics.Results: For detection of amblyogenic risk factor by refractive errors, spot vision screener had 90.5% sensitivity, 44.4% specificity, 88.4% positive predictive value and 50.0% negative predictive value. There was a significant difference between non-cycloplegic photoscreening and cycloplegic autorefraction (mean +0.86 diopter [D], &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001), which was more prominent in hyperopic eyes (+2.71 ± 1.17 vs. +5.00 ± 1.39 D, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; &lt; 0.001) compared with myopic eyes (-2.51 ± 1.41 D vs. -2.58 ± 1.32 D, &lt;i&gt;p&lt;/i&gt; = 0.599).Conclusions: Spot vision screener can help to detect vision issues quickly and easily in young children. Spot vision screener achieved acceptable sensitivity and positive predictive value in Korean preschool aged children, supporting the use of automated vision screening.

Canon CP-TX1 camera - As a screening tool for amblyogenic risk factors.

Purpose:To evaluate the Canon CP-TX1 camera as a screening tool for ARFs in a pediatric population and estimate the prevalence of ARFs.Methods:In a pediatric outpatient space, largely in the immunization clinic, after obtaining parental consent, we encouraged children to be photographed from a distance of 5 feet in a dim room by using a CP-TX1 camera with the red-eye reduction feature off. Based on the captured red reflex, children were labeled as normal (symmetrical red reflexes in the two eyes, with no visible crescents); all others were considered as abnormal or positive for ARFs. All photographed children were assessed by an optometrist/refractionist for VA by age-appropriate methods. Data were entered into a 2 × 2 contingency table on statpages.org, and diagnostic indices were calculated with 95%CI.Results:With a sample of 262 children, we obtained a sensitivity of 0.82, a specificity of 0.98, a positive predictive value of 0.92, a negative predictive value of 0.94, a positive likelihood ratio of 41.06, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.17, and a prevalence of 0.24 for ARFsConclusion:CP-TX1 performed well as a screening tool to identify ARFs in children. Placing such a camera in an immunization clinic offers a chance to identify children with ARFs at a time when amblyopia is eminently reversible.

Commentary: Smart click for amblyogenic risk factor screening.

Commentary: Smart click for amblyogenic risk factor screening.

Anisometropia and refractive status in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction—a prospective observational study

To assess the refractive status and anisometropia in children with unilateral and bilateral congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO). Consecutive children newly diagnosed with CNLDO were prospectively enrolled from November 2017 to May 2019. A complete ophthalmic evaluation including cycloplegic refraction was performed followed by appropriate intervention. Patients were followed for 6 months, and cycloplegic refraction was performed at each visit. The final refractive error was defined as the refractive error obtained from the most recent visit. Amblyogenic risk factors were assessed based on 2013 referral criteria of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS). A total of 308 patients with CNLDO were enrolled: 205 (67%) unilateral cases and 103 (33%) bilateral cases. In unilateral cases, the affected eye and unaffected fellow eye showed statistically significant difference in terms of sphere (P < 0.001), cylinder (P = 0.019), and spherical equivalent (P < 0.001); there was no interocular difference in bilateral cases (P > 0.05). Anisometropia was more prevalent in unilateral cases than in bilateral cases (11.2% vs 1.9%; P = 0.005). Based on the 2013 AAPOS referral criteria, 3.9% of the unilateral and 3.9% of bilateral cases exhibited amblyogenic risk factors. Later age of presentation was associated with higher rate of anisometropia (53.8% in the age group >48 months). In our study cohort, unilateral CNLDO was associated with a higher prevalence of anisometropia compared with bilateral CNLDO. The affected eye in unilateral CNLDO had higher prevalence of refractive error.

Prevalence of Visual Disorders among Urban Palestinian Preschool Children

Background: Childhood blindness is a major public health concern since 40% of visual disorders that can cause blindness among children are preventable. Vision screening programs among preschool children have been implemented in several countries as a tool for early detection and intervention of visual disorders. In Palestine, there is a lack of scientific data on the prevalence of visual disorders among children. In addition, vision-screening programs that are currently implemented are neither validated nor effective. Objective: Using validated vision screening protocols, a cross-sectional study is conducted to determine the prevalence of visual disorders among urban Palestinian preschool children between the ages of 3 to 5 years in Nablus city. Methods: All children attending eight preschools selected using single-stage cluster sampling technique, underwent a validated vision screening administered by trained eye care professionals. The screening protocol was based on a combination of clinical assessment adopted from the Modified Clinical Technique and the Vision in Preschoolers studies, including assessment of visual acuity, ocular alignment, depth perception, color vision, non-cycloplegic retinoscopy, and ocular health. A pass-fail criterion was used to refer all children who did not attend the vision screening for comprehensive eye examination, including cycloplegic retinoscopy and a dilated fundus exam. A chi-squared test was used to determine any association between visual disorders and their independent risk factors. Results: A total number of 764 children underwent vision screening. Out of the 290 children who did not attend the vision screening, 127 children responded to the referral call for comprehensive eye examinations. Refractive error was the most prevalent visual disorder with a prevalence of (29.37%), followed by amblyopia (4.10%), color vision deficiency (1.24%), strabismus (1.24%), and ocular health abnormalities (0.70%). There was no age (p=0.35) and gender (p=0.32) variation in children having refractive errors. Anisometropia was the leading cause for amblyopia (1.32%, n=7), followed by significant refractive error (1.13%, n=6) and strabismus (0.37%, n=2). Conclusion: Refractive error was the most prevalent visual disorder affecting Palestinian preschoolers in Nablus. Anisometropia and significant refractive errors were found to be the major causes of amblyopia. Effective nationwide preschool vision screening programs should be implemented in Palestine to screen amblyogenic risk factors.

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.

Binocular versus standard occlusion or blurring treatment for unilateral amblyopia in children aged three to eight years.

Can photoscreening effectively detect amblyogenic risk factors in children with neurodevelopmental disability?

Purpose:To analyze whether photoscreening can effectively detect amblyogenic risk factors in children with neurodevelopmental disability.Methods:A prospective study of 52 children attending a special school for children with neurodevelopmental disability from December 2017 to May 2018. All were initially tested with a photoscreening device: Welch Allyn® Spot® Vision Screener: model VS100 (Spot®) and further evaluated at a later date by a pediatric ophthalmologist, with a complete ocular evaluation including squint assessment, cycloplegic retinoscopy, and dilated fundus examination. The key parameters studied were demographic features, type of neurodevelopmental disability, refraction, ocular alignment, media clarity, any other ocular morbidity, and time taken for examination. The presence of amblyogenic risk factors (ARF) was analyzed as per the 2013 guidelines of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.Results:The mean age was 10.5 years (range: 1–17.5 years). Males (73.1%) outnumbered females (26.9%). The most common neurodevelopmental disability was cerebral palsy. Simple myopic astigmatism was the most common type of refractive error. Presence of ARF in our study was 73.1%. The sensitivity and specificity of photoscreening in detecting ARF were 96.5% and 63.61%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 80% and negative predictive value of 92.31%. The predictive ability of photoscreening was 79.9% as per the area under curve. The average time taken for photoscreening was less than 60 s.Conclusion:Photoscreening can detect ARF with high sensitivity and reasonable specificity and is a handy, useful, and time-saving tool in screening children with neurodevelopmental disability.

The positive predictive value of photoscreening devices for amblyogenic conditions

To determine the positive predictive value (PPV) of four photoscreening devices in detecting amblyogenic risk factors (ARFs). This is a retrospective cohort study of 1,200 failed vision screenings (FVS) referred to a pediatric eye care practice from general pediatric practices over a 5-year period. Comprehensive eye examinations and cycloplegic refractions were performed. Examination findings and FVS parameters were collected through chart review after completion of visits. Inclusion criteria were age 1-8 years, eye examination within 3 months of initial FVS, and availability of FVS and visit documentation. A total of 689 patients met inclusion criteria and were included in final analysis. The PPVs were 64.3% (95% CI, 62.73-65.81) for iScreen (n = 455), 26.8% (95% CI, 26.32-27.25) for Spot (n = 113), 18.9% (95% CI, 17.95-19.92) for Plusoptix (n = 38), and 18.5% (95% CI, 17.86-19.19) for GoCheck Kids (n = 55). For comparison, patients referred for failed Titmus tests were also analyzed. The PPV for Titmus testing was 39.3% (95% CI, 36.65-41.99; n = 28). The only screening device with a PPV >50% was the iScreen. PPV is a useful metric, because it enables referring providers to guide patients on a post-screening plan and to choose devices that minimize over-referral. Device PPV in the general pediatric population can be markedly different from device PPV in already existing pediatric eye care populations due to inherently different prevalence of ARFs. The iScreen also detected conditions such as cataracts, anisocoria, eyelid abnormalities, esotropia, exotropia, hypertropia, and amblyogenic astigmatism.

Community based vision screening in preschool children; performance of the Spot Vision Screener and optotype testing

ABSTRACT Background Children’s vision screening children commonly uses optotype-based visual acuity or instrument-based methods measuring amblyogenic risk factors (ARFs). Objective To compare the performance of the Spot Vision Screener (SVS) (PediaVision, Welch Allyn, NY) and a nurse-administered visual acuity screen (NVAS) in identifying ARFs and decreased visual acuity. Methods A prospective, cross-sectional population-based study of preschool children in South-East Queensland, Australia. Eligible participants had both forms of screening by trained community nurses. All children with an abnormal result by either method as well as a cohort of randomly selected children who passed both assessments were assessed at a tertiary paediatric ophthalmology clinic. Results Over a 10 month period, 2237 children (mean age; 64.4 ± 4.0 months) were screened from 38 schools. 6.4% of children failed SVS and 8.3% failed NVAS (with 3.8% overlap, failing both). The positive predictive value (PPV) in identifying either ARFs and/or reduced VA for the SVS and NVAS was 70.4% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 61.6%–78.2%) and 60.5% (95% CI: 52.6%–67.9%) respectively. Highest PPV to detect either ARFs and/or reduced VA was achieved by a ‘hybrid’ method by combining failed NVAS and failed SVS: 91.0% (95% CI: 82.4 to 96.3) but this would risk children with sight impairment being missed in the community. Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study providing detailed comparative measures of diagnostic accuracy for NVAS and SVS in preschool children. One in ten preschool children failed one or both screens. A number of children who required ophthalmic intervention were missed if only one screening method was utilized.

Etiology and Outcomes of Acquired Pediatric Sixth Nerve Palsies.

Acquired sixth nerve (CN6) palsies in children may be benign or associated with an underlying neurologic condition. In children who presented with isolated (no associated neurologic or ophthalmic symptoms or signs) CN6 palsies, the rate of newly diagnosed neurologic disorders (such as tumors) is unclear. Moreover, the factors associated with spontaneous resolution and amblyopia in children with acquired CN6 palsies are unknown. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all children younger than 18 years diagnosed with CN6 palsy at our institution from 2010 to 2020. We recorded ophthalmologic and neurologic history and examination findings, neuroimaging results, etiology of CN6 palsy, and outcomes including spontaneous resolution and amblyopia. We assessed etiologies of isolated and nonisolated CN6 palsies as well as frequency and factors associated with spontaneous resolution and amblyopia (in children ≤7 years). One hundred seventy-two children met inclusion criteria. Twenty CN6 palsies (12%) were isolated at presentation. Most isolated cases were presumed postviral or postvaccination (50%) or idiopathic (30%), but 2 cases (10%) were associated with newly diagnosed tumors. Spontaneous resolution occurred in 59% of CN6 palsies at a median of 12.3 weeks and was associated with older age (P = 0.03) and nontumor etiology (P = 0.006). Amblyopia developed in 18% of children at risk, exclusively in those with anisometropia, pre-existing strabismus, or younger than 12 months. Our findings and chart reviews suggest that approximately 10% of isolated acquired pediatric CN6 palsies are associated with a newly diagnosed brain tumor. This risk must be discussed with parents when considering immediate vs delayed neuroimaging. In addition, infants and children ≤7 years with secondary amblyogenic risk factors (anisometropia or pre-existing strabismus) require close follow-up to monitor and treat amblyopia.

Ophthalmic features of craniosynostosis: A Malaysian experience.

This study aims to collect local Malaysian data regarding the ophthalmic features and complications in craniosynostosis patients who attended the Combined Craniofacial Clinic (CFC) in University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC). Retrospective study of medical notes of craniosynostosis patients who attended the CFC in UMMC from 2014 to December 2020. Out of 37 patients, 29 had syndromic craniosynostosis, and 8 had non-syndromic craniosynostosis. Visual impairment was present in 32.1% of patients. Causes for visual impairment were as follows - amblyopia (25.0%), exposure keratopathy (3.6%), and optic atrophy (3.6%). Hypermetropia and myopia were each seen in 20.6% of patients. Astigmatism was seen in 47.1% of patients, and 29.1% had anisometropia. Proptosis was present in 78.6% and lagophthalmos in 53.3% of patients. Strabismus in primary position occurred in 51.7% of patients. Thirty-one percent of the patients had exposure keratopathy. Optic disc atrophy was seen in 13.7% of patients, and 8.3% had optic disc swelling. Optic disc swelling was resolved in all patients who underwent craniofacial surgery. Our experience in Malaysia was consistent with previously reported data on ophthalmic features of craniosynostosis patients. Additionally, we found that non-syndromic craniosynostosis patients are also at risk of ocular complications just as much as syndromic patients. Appropriate treatment of amblyogenic risk factors, ocular complications, and timely detection of papilledema, and prompt surgical intervention are crucial in preserving long-term visual function in these patients.

Visual outcomes in children with syndromic craniosynostosis: a review of 165 cases.

To determine visual outcomes and prevalence of amblyogenic risk factors in children with Apert, Crouzon, Pfeiffer and Saethre-Chotzen syndromes. We conducted a single-centre, retrospective chart review of patients assessed at our unit between October 2000 and May 2017. Our outcome measures were as follows: ageat first and last examination, refraction, horizontal ocular alignment, alphabet pattern deviations, anterior segment appearance, fundus examination findings, visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and genetics. The study's primary endpoint was the proportion of children achieving best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥ 6/12 in the better eye at final visit, as per UK driving standards. 165 patients were included in this study. Breakdown of diagnoses was as follows: Crouzon (n = 60), Apert (n = 57), Pfeiffer (n = 14) and Saethre-Chotzen (n = 34). 98 patients were male. Of 133 patients with full BCVA data available, 76.7% achieved BCVA ≥ 6/12 in the better eye. Of 122 patients, anisometropia >1.00 dioptre sphere (DS) affected 18.9% and astigmatism ≥1.00DS in at least one eye affected 67.2%. Of 246 eyes, 48.4% had oblique astigmatism. Of 165 patients, 60 had exotropia and 12 had esotropia. 48 of 99 patients demonstrated 'V' pattern. On multivariable logistic regression, nystagmus (p = 0.009) and ON involvement (p = 0.001) were associated with decreased vision in the worse eye. Normal VEPs were associated with better BCVA (p = 0.036). There was a high prevalence of amblyogenic factors, however, the majority achieved BCVA ≥ 6/12 in their better eye. Optic neuropathy and nystagmus had the most significant impact on vision. VEPs can help the in overall assessment of visual function.

Identification of amblyogenic risk factors with the Brückner reflex test using the low-cost Arclight direct ophthalmoscope.

The Arclight is a novel, low-cost, solar-powered direct ophthalmoscope developed for low resource settings as an alternative to more expensive, conventional devices. The Brückner reflex test (BRT) is a quick and effective means to screen for eye disease and amblyogenic risk factors. This test is however rarely performed in low resource settings due to the lack of access to ophthalmoscopes and trained health care workers. Our aim was to establish the sensitivity and specificity of the BRT when performed by a non-expert using an Arclight and compare to an expert as well as the results of a full clinic workup. In this prospective, blinded study, 64 patients referred to a paediatric ophthalmology clinic had the BRT performed by a 'non-expert' observer (medical student) then an 'expert' observer (consultant ophthalmologist). These results were then compared against the 'gold standard' outcomes of a full clinical workup. BRT screening by the expert observer led to a sensitivity of 75.0% [95% CI: 57.9-86.8%] and a specificity of 90.6% [95% CI: 75.8-96.8%] in picking up media opacity, strabismus, refractive error or a combination of the above. For the non-expert, the sensitivity and specificity were 71.9% [95% CI: 54.6-84.4%] and 84.4% [95% CI: 68.3-93.1%], respectively. The Arclight can be effectively used to perform the BRT and identify eye disease and common amblyogenic risk factors. Even when performed by a non-expert the results are highly specific and moderately sensitive. This study consequently offers support for the use of this low-cost ophthalmoscope in the expansion of eye screening by health care workers in low resource settings.